Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#435 - durkadurka ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
The problem here is that we need to find a way to fix this that will make everyone (or as many as possible) happy. People want gays to have the same benefits and legal status as married couples, and people also want to keep the definition of marriage the same.

So perhaps we could remove government recognition of marriage altogether; We'd use a different term, it'd apply to everyone, and would treat everyone equally under the law. Marriage could then be a term/title of a purely religious nature (it'd have no legal benefits/recognition).

The only thing I really care about in this whole issue is for people to come together and be reasonable. It's time to end the "us vs. them" mentality.
#395 - goldpawn
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Its happeneing again!
Its happeneing again!
#391 - thebritishguy
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
it's just really annoying how selective it is, the bible also supports slavery and yet the Christians are against it and when it comes to gay marriage they support it
#364 - UberAndrew
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
The whole problem with it is that marriage is religious in origin and in that same religion it's considered wrong to be gay, so in christian eyes it's blasphemous against their religion.

But marriage has long evolved from being only a religious ceremony, and is more of a common staple of modern society. But even though we're promised separation of state and church most of the people in charge of things are religious and have religious views, often threatening equal human rights.

Just give it a few more years, gay marriage will be legal in every state soon enough. Remember when black people weren't allowed in the same bathrooms as white people? Remember when women couldn't vote? Human rights change for the better over time.
#389 to #364 - fogglebeast
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Actually, marriage pre-dates religion (or at least as far as I know, definitely Christianity). It was formerly a ceremony that basically gave away a familiy's daughter for another man to own (the wedding ring a symbol of her being owned by the man). Now, from this, I assume that the reason gay marriage isn't traditional is that a man wouldn't own a man in this way back then, and so gay marriage was unheard of.   
   
But aside from all this, I'd say that I disagree with it anyway; not just gay marriage, but marriage as a whole.   
   
Though it certainly has changed from what it used to be, I'd say that marriage lacks trust between the married. Seriously - it's promising that you won't run off with anyone else, and to make sure you keep that promise, the government gets involved and creates a whole contract to follow. Can't couples just trust each other? And to make matters worse, it costs money to get married - its as though our whole system of love and trust is based on government contracts and money.
Actually, marriage pre-dates religion (or at least as far as I know, definitely Christianity). It was formerly a ceremony that basically gave away a familiy's daughter for another man to own (the wedding ring a symbol of her being owned by the man). Now, from this, I assume that the reason gay marriage isn't traditional is that a man wouldn't own a man in this way back then, and so gay marriage was unheard of.

But aside from all this, I'd say that I disagree with it anyway; not just gay marriage, but marriage as a whole.

Though it certainly has changed from what it used to be, I'd say that marriage lacks trust between the married. Seriously - it's promising that you won't run off with anyone else, and to make sure you keep that promise, the government gets involved and creates a whole contract to follow. Can't couples just trust each other? And to make matters worse, it costs money to get married - its as though our whole system of love and trust is based on government contracts and money.
#355 - alexjonez
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#357 to #355 - dildoes
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
He never uses his account, but there are some people with related usernames that do.
#345 - greensky
Reply -6
(03/28/2013) [-]
What's with all that gay marriage content recently? I'm sick of it and it disgusts me so stop.
Just
stop
#360 to #345 - revorce
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
How does it disgust you?
#344 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
not even close to the same thing
#343 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Dont deny child's rights for your ******** pleasure. Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother. The issue is the right of children to have a mother and a father who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by people who do not want to get married to someone of the complementary sex but rather who want access to children.
One Mama, One Papa, True Parents You should learn this from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
#398 to #343 - someponynew
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
bro. That's implying that EVERY couple EVER had children... I've known pleanty of families who don't and never will have children...
#341 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjDPGkv1R6E

this is how you gotta deal with fags.
#310 - croski
Reply -10
(03/28/2013) [-]
Actually, the women has a right as an owner to do that. If this is somewhere in the USA I don't see a problem, because its a country where you have a right to shoot at trespassers.

And the gay marriage part shall not receive my comment.
#322 to #310 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
unless it's private property, she has no say as to who can park on a public street ... and as for gay marriage, your a phaggut
#278 - alucardshellhound
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
**alucardshellhound rolled a random image posted in comment #558218 at Anime & Manga - anime shows, anime games, anime art, manga **
#177 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
I personally prefer pancakes over waffles.
#388 to #177 - eddymolly
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Me to, especially if they are covered in syrup and fruit
#167 - gagging **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#157 - valabigballs
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#147 - jaketasticness
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#152 to #147 - terrorrizor
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
**terrorrizor rolled a random image posted in comment #89 at Who? ** mfw the syntax of that meme
**terrorrizor rolled a random image posted in comment #89 at Who? ** mfw the syntax of that meme
#141 - Dwarf
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
**Dwarf rolled a random image posted in comment #3555067 at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** I'm against gay marriage, and I think it's because of pricks like this. **** you Charlie.
#129 - robinwilliamson ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Honestly, there's no logical reason homosexuality should exist, it's only found in essentially anti-evolutionary situations.
1) A DNA accident in the womb cause unnecessary levels of the wrong hormones
2) Giving up on women
3) Believing that their curiosity stage in adolescence is "who they are"
and maybe a few other points.
If there was a god, he wouldn't have any reason to make that DNA accident a possibility, though this is rethinking the entire situation of the human race, still.
Bi-curiosity? Reasonable. But homosexuality is only accepted because it happens.
#132 to #129 - swagbot
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
I don't get the "curiosity" stage everyone talks about.

I only started thinking about girls more...
#85 - flamingpie
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
Unless ya know.... you're gay
#53 - carneymaster
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
she probably lived in that house, and something bad happend, her husband died there or something. She cant bring herself to sell the house for some reason. but she also cant live there for the same reason probably. Unless she is just crazy. Does she rent it out? If not shes either crazy or sentimental and is now a cranky old lady.
#34 - jakuhlope
Reply -4
(03/28/2013) [-]
I'm pro-straight marriage. I'm also pro-opinion. If someone wants to dislike gay marriage, they can. Honestly, as someone who has been in school around about 30-40 gays, I can tell you all first hand that all but two are attention whores or can't get a relationship with someone of the opposite gender, so they say they're gay, hold hands with some other "gay" person and yell at anyone who isn't gay. To those two, and actual gay people everywhere: good on you. For example: NPH is gay, but Perez Hilton is a massive flaming faggot who would best service humanity by being dead.
But seriously, if you want to be gay, be gay. If you think you're equal, and deserve equal rights, then act like it and quit parading around.
DISCLAIMER: EXAGGERATIONS
What if I ran around the streets screaming like Duke Nukem and slapping every girl I see on the ass because it's my right as a straight male to do so?
"FASCIST PIG!"
"MISOGYNIST!"
But if it's done for homosexuality:
"That's ok I guess, he/she's just expressing his right to love a person of the same gender."
Hooray for straight people. Hooray for actual gay people. Just quit your bitchin' and the problem will solve itself.
Rant over, and thank you for your time.
#35 to #34 - anon
Reply 0
(03/28/2013) [-]
you have no idea what you're talking about. this isn't a goddamn pro-opinion issue. people are being denied rights.
#45 to #35 - jakuhlope
Reply -2
(03/28/2013) [-]
By whom?