Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#488 - DutchBlood (03/09/2013) [-]
America got RDJ. North Korea will never win.
America got RDJ. North Korea will never win.
#521 to #488 - senoldlx (03/09/2013) [-]
true words of wisdom
true words of wisdom
#206 - theelderscrolls (03/09/2013) [-]
Go ahead. Throw a few nukes at us. We ******* DARE you.
#210 to #206 - nitsuan (03/09/2013) [-]
"How 'bout a relief package, eh America?"

And then the cycle continues!
#89 - ridiculiculous (03/09/2013) [-]
Don't know why there is hate on the U.S.A, think about ALL the porn you wouldn't have!
#485 - vynillabear (03/09/2013) [-]
alright I have a genuine question. I know I'm probably uninformed but can't we shoot down nukes now? Isn't there that whole Patriot missile interceptor system thing?
User avatar #498 to #485 - UberAndrew (03/09/2013) [-]
I'm fairly sure we can.
I don't think there's too much fear of a nuke actually hitting us.
#519 to #498 - vynillabear (03/09/2013) [-]
yea thats what I assumed, so why do North Korea's nuclear weapons frighten us so much?
User avatar #522 to #519 - UberAndrew (03/09/2013) [-]
In actuality there isn't too much actual fear of a nuclear strike doing us any harm, but it's pretty much guaranteed that there will be war if they attempt a nuke strike, and whether we win or lose war is always messy.
#523 to #522 - vynillabear (03/09/2013) [-]
true true, I never looked at it from that way before. Thanks for your insight. Here's an irrelevant gif for your troubles.
true true, I never looked at it from that way before. Thanks for your insight. Here's an irrelevant gif for your troubles.
User avatar #541 to #523 - warlike (03/09/2013) [-]
We're not so much worried it'll hit us, we're worried for South Korea, Japan, and all the other countries in striking range.
#372 - rollcore (03/09/2013) [-]
**rollcore rolled a random image posted in comment #9 at Jesus Christ **
**rollcore rolled a random image posted in comment #9 at Jesus Christ **
#366 - felixjarl ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
User avatar #332 - Keoul (03/09/2013) [-]
Nukes didn't work so now N.Korea will hit America where it hurts...
With Piracy...
#215 - responsibletim (03/09/2013) [-]
I ******* lost my **** at the last panel for some reason.
#218 to #215 - John Cena (03/09/2013) [-]
that's because it's like the punchline of a joke... It's supposed to make you laugh
User avatar #88 - flipkore (03/09/2013) [-]
Can't tell if he's saying come at me bro or asking for a hug
#69 - ninjamyles **User deleted account** (03/08/2013) [-]
i may be be wrong so don't quote me on this, but im sure north Korea has nuclear weapons, and if even one of them hit the US it would magilly **** it (and the rest of the world,) up.
User avatar #148 to #69 - szymonf (03/09/2013) [-]
NK does not have nuclear weapons, yet.
User avatar #75 to #69 - reddeadtroll (03/08/2013) [-]
Not really, North Korea's Nuclear program is actually kinda pathetic considering the reputation they have.
User avatar #76 to #75 - ninjamyles **User deleted account** (03/08/2013) [-]
oh, well still, any nuclear weapon still has a potential for large scale destruction. and really all it takes is one good/lucky shot on a military base housing a powerful nuclear weapon and you have a giant chain nuclear reaction
User avatar #78 to #76 - reddeadtroll (03/08/2013) [-]
Oh i'm definitely not saying that they're harmless, i'm just saying in comparison with the rest of the world (U.S. included) they don't really have ALL the firepower that they like to pretend they do.
#84 to #78 - thefatmenace (03/08/2013) [-]
The U.S. and South Koreans (I'm not sure who else FOR SURE is watching them) is watching every single inch of North Korea the whole time. If so much as somebody sneezes over the border, we're there to toss over a tissue. They're definently not harmless, but if they ever make a move against us or the South Koreans, then we have the military might to destroy them AND stop the nuke before it even crosses the ocean.
User avatar #95 to #69 - rafeky (03/09/2013) [-]
Well I'm amusing -so i may be wrong- that the US has a state of the art detection thingy that would be able to catch the missile before it made to there.
User avatar #122 to #95 - andriod (03/09/2013) [-]
True. We have the ability to know at any moment when a missile of any kind is launched and can send intercept missiles to match its trajectory.

I believe Israel has the similar technology protecting them as well.
#126 to #122 - rfcoke (03/09/2013) [-]
I think you are talking about the Iron Dome over Israel, right? Destroys most of the missiles coming at them before they get close enough to do damage.
User avatar #549 to #126 - andriod (03/09/2013) [-]
correct. I couldnt remember what they called it. thanks
User avatar #131 to #69 - sirbutterballs (03/09/2013) [-]
They have Nukes but we have anti-missile missiles (ironic I know) and NK most likely doesn't have long range missiles.
User avatar #133 to #131 - defender (03/09/2013) [-]
Their longest range missile barely reaches the north part of Australia
User avatar #134 to #133 - sirbutterballs (03/09/2013) [-]
So yeah. We'll be alright.
#242 to #69 - John Cena (03/09/2013) [-]
Even if NK did they wont be able to make them anymore anyway lol the UN sanctioned the **** out of them since his last statement of putting washington dc in a "sea of flames". Also NK is pretty pathetic in military might. In fact the US doesn't even need nukes to **** them over. They could just send regular bombers and they'd be gone. I really think you underestimate US's techonological might power and ******* money put into it is insane compared to any other country lol... NK has disciplined soldiers but um... yea they can't fit a nuke war head on a missile yet let alone produce nukes.
User avatar #124 to #69 - RageRambo ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
If NK launches a missile. They'll start a war with the whales and somehow manage to lose.
#150 to #69 - alphadolan (03/09/2013) [-]

User avatar #466 - wizlock (03/09/2013) [-]
China supports north korea, and you probably know that china is one ************ you don't want to **** with
User avatar #491 to #466 - zakaizer (03/09/2013) [-]
Actually, since N.Korea started this whole 'Break the peace treaty' malarkey, China and Russia (Both former allies) have now turned their backs on them, and are siding with the UN... Kim hasn't got a chance.
#269 - John Cena (03/09/2013) [-]
Ya know, you guys sure do seem awfully arrogant about the little guy. Be careful, that arrogance could be your undoing.
#312 to #269 - comanderspy (03/09/2013) [-]
i dont know why you guys are thumbing him down, are you afraid of the truth? i mean, if they bomb L.A. the U.S. is ****** . L.A. is a major economic city and how the economy is right now, it could send the us to the ******* , just one city.
User avatar #351 to #312 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
oh gawd that ******* typo......
User avatar #359 to #358 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
in the pic it says cons D I Er instead of consider
#360 to #359 - comanderspy (03/09/2013) [-]
lol sorry, the pic isnt mine
User avatar #362 to #360 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
I understand, but it still gets me every time i see it.
#273 to #269 - John Cena (03/09/2013) [-]
Get buttmad about it all you want. A threat, no matter how small and seemingly weak, should be written off. That attitude has killed far too many.
#279 to #269 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
A few bombs could wipe out their entire country. It's tiny, it wouldn't be a contest.
User avatar #285 to #279 - Endofzeeworld (03/09/2013) [-]
You ever heard of the Vietnam or even Korean wars? They were some pretty big contests.
#286 to #285 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
We've came a long way in technology since then, it's a whole new ball game. They're directly threatening us.
User avatar #290 to #286 - Endofzeeworld (03/09/2013) [-]
>Implying america is the only country with any technological advancements.
#292 to #290 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
>Implying ******* North Korea the most secluded country in all of the world is going to have anywhere near the technological advancements as the US. It's a **** hole.
#334 to #292 - yuukiii (03/09/2013) [-]
because they are tiny and not much is heard from them due to very very strict law regarding what outsiders can know, there is a big chance the people who live in Cali (like myself) and the other western states to be hit by nukes. you can never really know what goes on until its too late.
also america is too stupid as a whole and think we are untouchable. * cough9/11cough*
#335 to #334 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
You think we won't see an attack coming from NK now?
User avatar #336 to #335 - yuukiii (03/09/2013) [-]
no, no i think we do. we just dont know when or where.
its kinda like playing the waiting game.
#354 to #336 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
And you don't think the Us has surveillance over the country the size of what, Montana?
User avatar #550 to #354 - yuukiii (03/09/2013) [-]
maybe spy's (not very likely) but actual cameras or some thing wont be able to go inside that country. the cameras from space yes but again they are not that good. if we were to send unman drones to take better pics or video N. Korea has their right to shoot them down. you have to think about it this way:
anything that is considered a threat to us, is a threat to any country no matter how bad other people make them to be.
(omg) nukes are being tested . so? nukes are being tested and built in many places including the u.s (maybe not the testing part) point is, like many place in the world no one wants to be pushed around and therefore they must put on a show to say "hey dont mess with me i can hurt you"
#558 to #550 - fingapopyabuttho (03/09/2013) [-]
And you think they care if they shoot their drone down? You're ignorant if you don't think we'll be ready for whatever they try to throw at us. Especially now that they've threatened us. At the end of the day, NK has a limited amount of time before it's taken out of existence.
User avatar #566 to #558 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
you are mistaken and sound very angry at the same time.
i never said that we were not ready or anything. and to call someone ignorant just because they do not mention that "we are ready for what they throw at us" really just makes you sound like a "trigger happy" idiot. in a perfect world none of this would be happening but oh well a threat is nothing if there is nothing to back it up. and yea they may or may not have the means to do much damage.
#567 to #566 - fingapopyabuttho (03/10/2013) [-]
There's nothing trigger happy about striking back against someone attacking you, I'm done with this.
User avatar #568 to #567 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
it does when no one was attacking you in the first place ;)
#569 to #568 - fingapopyabuttho (03/10/2013) [-]
I sound trigger happy about firing back at someone who is attacking us?
User avatar #570 to #569 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
who ISN'T attacking us.
unless they actually do something they are no real harm. think of it this way "they are talking **** , now if they throw the first punch then you have the right to kick their ass"
this is what most parents tell their kids when something happens at school. BUT like so many people today "you talking **** about me ima go over there and kick your ass to make you stop" which in the end leads to more problems.
#571 to #570 - fingapopyabuttho (03/10/2013) [-]
What the **** are you going on about? I said unless they attack us in the first place.
User avatar #572 to #571 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
trust me you didn't
plus saying "its only a matter of time before they are wipe out" or some ******** is actually quite mean.
becoming Hitler are we?
just because someone is doing something doesn't mean the rest of their people have to suffer. and this isn't going towards you personally i just hate how people say stupid ******** like that. its like saying "Bush ****** us over, no matter we'll just kill him and his family and the people who were in charge with him and the people who voted for him hell we'll just kill everyone that would fix everything"
#587 to #572 - fingapopyabuttho (03/11/2013) [-]
I can't reply to your comments so I'm done.
#575 to #572 - fingapopyabuttho (03/10/2013) [-]
I liked bush by the way, it's being as ignorant as saying we shouldn't of attacked when 9/11 happened, we should've just let it go. Moron.
User avatar #582 to #575 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
he ****** us over by still following his dad long before 9/11 happen.
yea they had oil but what the hell is the point of going to war (not 9/11)?
if you know ur history you would know this **** started in the late 80's early 90's
9/11 was just the push or excuse they needed to start that stupid war.
this is why he ****** us over, yea we are okay-ish now but now its "Obama's fault"
people are stupid, people who follow are even more so.
you may like bush but he was a puppet not a leader.
#573 to #572 - fingapopyabuttho (03/10/2013) [-]
I love how you're spitting out paragraphs and telling me what I said when I know what I said. Shut the hell up.
User avatar #574 to #573 - yuukiii (03/10/2013) [-]
you first my dear
User avatar #314 to #292 - comanderspy (03/09/2013) [-]
>implying china isnt going to give a ****
User avatar #361 to #314 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
they really won't. North Korea keeps lying about **** and breaking promises and treaties.
User avatar #338 to #292 - Endofzeeworld (03/09/2013) [-]
But they get all their support from where? That's right, kids! The People's Republic of China, the industrial superpower of the 21st Century!
#344 to #269 - John Cena (03/09/2013) [-]
It's essentially common knowledge that America has the most dominant military power over the world. Korea, sure, they're up there definitely but hold no real threat to America. Korea makes no comparison to the amount of money, resources and time they spend on their militia. I would undoubtedly say Korea would be the first to make an attack, but that's because they're quite sadistic. If they try anything, they're gone. End of.
User avatar #551 to #344 - yuukiii (03/09/2013) [-]
keep in mind that if that whole country is bombed what about its people who are innocent? plus knowing america and their "trigger happy" military N.Korea and S.Korea are the same ****** thing. if you want to make a country defenseless get rid of their military bases not their ****** people
User avatar #230 - TheReich (03/09/2013) [-]
"Trot Trot Trot. BOK"

Is that some weird ass North Korean language **** ?
User avatar #253 to #230 - lazysuzan (03/09/2013) [-]
The **** , are you joking.

Trot is an onomatopoeia, implies stimulus of sound.

No idea what the **** ''BOK'' is...
User avatar #257 to #253 - Mecryte (03/09/2013) [-]
The sound of a hollow missile ricocheting off of giant steel toed combat boots.
User avatar #261 to #257 - lazysuzan (03/09/2013) [-]
Well said
#254 to #253 - TheReich (03/09/2013) [-]
Yes... Yes I was joking.

#260 to #254 - lazysuzan (03/09/2013) [-]
Oh lordy, I am so sorry.   
Obey the Reich
Oh lordy, I am so sorry.

Obey the Reich
#263 to #260 - TheReich (03/09/2013) [-]
It's k. I still love you.
It's k. I still love you.
#265 to #263 - lazysuzan (03/09/2013) [-]
luv u 2 <3
luv u 2 <3
#266 to #265 - TheReich (03/09/2013) [-]
#267 to #266 - lazysuzan (03/09/2013) [-]
I D K ... you want more?
I D K ... you want more?
User avatar #209 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
then china
#219 to #209 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
That's a good point. Although, I think that China agrees with America on the trade sanctions (what caused N.K to threaten nukes). As long as China agrees with America, It won't happen, or it would be REALLY REALLY STUPID if N.K did. And here's why.
China is right above N.K, South Korea is right below. While Chinese troops move in from the North, American troops along with South Korean troops could move in from the south. North Korea would basically be CORNERED and would either have to surrender to whatever the **** terms the "allies" made, or have the country name of North Korea completely gone, and renamed something more democratic.
Also, during the Korean War, China was the only country stopping U.S forces from pushing N.K back further. That bright idea was the idea of General MacArthur's, but President Eisenhower declined claiming it would start a World War 3 if we got into China from N.K. Also, MacArthur was eventually fired because of that too.
User avatar #233 to #219 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i am enlightened, thank you.
#234 to #233 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
No one ever wants to debate International Relations / Foreign Affairs with me.
#249 to #234 - anaklusmos (03/09/2013) [-]
Do you think that this BS with North Korea is actually a big deal? I mean they threatened us sure but I think the media is throwing the whole thing out of proportion. They don't have the missiles capable of carrying out their threat and if they did (which would suck since I live in DC) the repercussions would be infinitely worse for them. We're not Japan, we've been prepared for a Nuclear war for years. We'd wipe NK off the map.
#259 to #249 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
They don't have the missiles to travel from N.K to Washington D.C, that's true. But what's stopping them from getting a Destroyer Naval ship, load a couple nukes on there and getting 90 miles or so off the U.S coastline? I'm sure that America would sink the Destroyer before anything could happen but it's probably a legit threat. Also, America doesn't know for sure if N.K has ICBM"s or not, we sure think they don't but, there might be underground launch facilities in N.K that drones can't fly over. America is unsure of the threat they actually pose, it's probably not big, but it might be
User avatar #236 to #234 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i would, but i dont know much about NK, anyway when do you think the war with NK start will if their even is one.
#243 to #236 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Well, I think China would have to be against us for N.K even to consider launching their toys at us. China isn't going to want to go into a direct conflict/war with America since we import a lot of goods from China. It would damage their economy too much. With that being said, I think that it's a very very small chance of Kim Jung launching his nukes at the U.S. Although, he might do something to S.K (like launch a nuke) but that would still be really really risky because the U.S would have troops to S.K within days to back them and with S.K/American troops along with China pushing from the North down, N.K would be kinda squeezed in the middle.

Maybe N.K might sign a treaty with Iran and then with a couple hundred thousand more troops than America and two countries with growing developmental capabilities for Nuclear weapons. Iran (since it would be closer) would launch one at America, while N.K launches a nuke at S.K. That might be a possible scenario to me i would think.
User avatar #255 to #243 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
You'd assume China wouldnt go to war with the U.S but i feel since we are moving into syria China and Russia wouldnt mind joining North Korea
#264 to #255 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
If China and Russia joined N.K, that would be World War III. Also, the Axis powers (China, Russia, N.K) would easily out number U.S troops by a few million. The U.S homeland would very likely to be invaded, we would get a few nukes thrown our way, The U.S would throw some of their nukes. One world power simply cannot take two world powers along with more allies. It'd be over before it even started. Keep in mind that N.K doesn't have ICBM"s but both China and Russia do.
User avatar #268 to #264 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
Im guessing if the whole WWIII were to happen we would have to have help so we'd call upon Britain and Canada would help us get rid of the invaders. We'd probably back out of South Korea and let them deal with north while Britain and the U.S go to war with Russia and China
#274 to #268 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Britain would be a vital allie if U.S had gotten into World War III. It is a really scary thought knowing all of this can potentially happen and all the countries (U.S, G.B, China, Russia) all have nuclear capabilities. The only thing that could even have a slight chance of saving the entire world from total destruction would be the world leaders come together, get their **** together, and disassemble all of their nukes.
China launches one at D.C, America, Russia launches one in a big city along the west coast. Russian + Chinese troops move in to invade our homeland they would need to secure a small portion of our homeland (probably one of the nuke areas) G.B along with American troops would back the Axis troops out of their secure area after (probably months of fighting) with jets and tanks rolling in.

To me, it would be like "My toy is bigger than yours game" where the world power with the biggest and baddest toy wins. If you think about it, there's more countries that are against the U.S or Communist than there are with the U,S.
Let's say G.B acts as 4 regular countries, there's probably 16 countries that would be against the U.S.

User avatar #277 to #274 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
I know thats the scary part and if it happens itd be the nuclear fallout that would probably leave the human race extinct. But i think the "upcoming civil war" in the U.S would also cause a cease in fighting
#559 to #277 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Upcoming Civil war? Go on?
User avatar #581 to #559 - agonizingkingjake (03/10/2013) [-]
Well with the upcoming economic collapse and the government trying to take guns its just a matter of time before a civil war occurs
couple links if you wanna read up
User avatar #256 to #243 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i see what your saying, china wouldnt likely attack us because we owe them tons of money any they cant collect their money once they attack us. As for NK once their country starts to crumble which it will eventually i think its very likely that they launch what nukes they have at SK and invade SK again. then we get involved, its the Korean war all over again.
User avatar #79 - frichein ONLINE (03/08/2013) [-]
Did you guys see the video they sent out recently? I hope someone can recognize the music they used.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQUSTrtJS3U ***heres music

www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/02/20/north-korea-releases-another-propaganda-video-this-one-with-obama-in-flames/ *** heres a second source.
User avatar #80 to #79 - lazylazarus (03/08/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3EOibiVzq4 it tells you in the source the music they used but here you go
User avatar #85 to #79 - mjdjoy (03/09/2013) [-]
That videos music sounds like part of the Skyrim Theme...
User avatar #143 to #85 - kingrayne (03/09/2013) [-]
not skyrim
User avatar #152 to #143 - mjdjoy (03/09/2013) [-]
True, sorry. I've just been playing Skyirm non stop for a while.
#99 to #79 - Kanoah ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
#175 to #120 - Kanoah ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
Oh the memories...
Oh the memories...
User avatar #41 - dmagen (03/08/2013) [-]
you do know that in about 2-3 years they will be able to target anywhere in west america with a nuke right?
even if they will get obliterated later, they will still kill a lot of people (I'm not from the US btw)
#62 to #41 - John Cena (03/08/2013) [-]
And you do realize the US has a very powerful anti-missile defense system right? The US is capable of seeing a missile fired as soon as it leaves the ground.
#82 to #41 - Azz (03/08/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, but given NK's track record, I'm highly doubtful...
User avatar #97 to #41 - Onemanretardpack (03/09/2013) [-]
How that would go down:
>NK launches their nukes
>Nukes blow up 200 feet after liftoff
>Entire major cities are blown off the map
>USA is blamed for the whole thing, saying that they instigated the missile launch somehow
User avatar #114 to #97 - andriod (03/09/2013) [-]
Or we sabotage it and get yelled at for overstepping our authority.
User avatar #156 to #114 - Onemanretardpack (03/09/2013) [-]
We don't have to sabotage **** , did you see their last military parade? They towed their nukes with goddamn tractors. Not to mention their nukes are the most inefective pieces of **** every created. They only use like 3% of their fissionable materials on detonation
User avatar #548 to #156 - dmagen (03/09/2013) [-]
listen I don;t want to make you afraid or anything like it, but you have to realize that no matter how stupid they are they still will have the capability to do it in 2 years. sure there will be tons of ways to prevent it, but still you can't take it lightly when a country who has nukes says they want to lunch one on you.
my country is also in a similar (but meanwhile less worse) situation (I'm from Israel, it that doesn't explain it I will be happy to).
 Friends (0)