x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#526 - strawberryfields (03/09/2013) [-]
1.What the **** did you just ******* say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the **** out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my ******* words. You think you can get away with saying that **** to me over the Internet? Think again, ****** . As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're ******* dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little **** . If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your ******* tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will **** fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're ******* dead, kiddo.
#174 - vizz ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
Then the Us realised that missile was filled with smallpox
User avatar #200 to #174 - ivoryhammer (03/09/2013) [-]
A disease that has a cure that is readily available in almost every first world country? Jesus Christ how horrifying.
User avatar #251 to #200 - vizz ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
What about super strains developed in bio warfare labs that have an immunity to current cures?
User avatar #98 - fukkendragonite (03/09/2013) [-]
>implying China wouldn't help North Korea out
0
#160 to #98 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#192 to #98 - Rascal (03/09/2013) [-]
Of coarse it depends on circumstance but you're right if for no other reason (and there are other reasons) than China doesn't want America to have a military foothold connecting them directly by land.
#162 to #98 - rprzombie (03/09/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Go learn politics.
User avatar #104 to #98 - gcloud (03/09/2013) [-]
they wont...
User avatar #155 to #98 - smittywrbmnjnsn (03/09/2013) [-]
>Implying China hasn't already stated that they will not side against America
User avatar #116 to #98 - sphincterface (03/09/2013) [-]
China wouldn't. China is a part of the United Nations Security Council. It's practically their job to avoid nuclear war. And North Korea has been pissing them off. Plus we owe tons of money to China anyways.
User avatar #132 to #98 - defender (03/09/2013) [-]
implying that china would side with a **** poor country
User avatar #100 to #98 - szymonf (03/09/2013) [-]
China is getting annoyed by North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons. China didn't even try to block the new UN sanctions.
User avatar #117 to #100 - xxbutthurtxx (03/09/2013) [-]
They didn't blocked the UN sanctions but they also didn't agree with them.
They pleaded for lower sanctions.
User avatar #146 to #117 - szymonf (03/09/2013) [-]
You are right, but that doesn't mean that they are not worried with what NK is doing.
User avatar #149 to #146 - xxbutthurtxx (03/09/2013) [-]
Yes, China is still annoyed by North Korea. They prefer peace in east Asia and want to profit from their relations to the western economy.
User avatar #151 to #149 - szymonf (03/09/2013) [-]
You are completely correct.
User avatar #105 to #100 - fukkendragonite (03/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, because they don't want war. They know that if it kicks off, they'll end up having to support them. They'd rather avoid conflict.

However if conflict happens....
User avatar #144 to #105 - szymonf (03/09/2013) [-]
If conflict were to happen then China would most likely not interfere with military aggression. They would stand to lose too much economically and they would most likely lose legitimacy and leverage in their territorial disputes.
User avatar #106 to #105 - drfreeman (03/09/2013) [-]
Then they lose all the money we owe them and we'd lose over half our debt
User avatar #127 to #105 - redthumbmaster (03/09/2013) [-]
There are already rumors of assassination planning on Kim Jong-un from China.
User avatar #121 to #105 - srskate (03/09/2013) [-]
China is actually in a bit of trouble if the war happens. NK has short range missile capabilities.
User avatar #141 to #121 - kingrayne ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
also if a trade embargo happens, China's economy would collapse rapidly.
#5 - pallypal (03/08/2013) [-]
Aha. It's funny because America thinks its the head of the world.
User avatar #10 to #5 - underporches (03/08/2013) [-]
How is that why it's funny?
#13 to #10 - pallypal (03/08/2013) [-]
It's not.

This is not funny, it's sad.
User avatar #19 to #5 - sockprague (03/08/2013) [-]
In some ways we are. One of the very few ways is war. Sun Tzu may have created the art of war, but America has perfected it.
User avatar #585 - rocksteady (03/10/2013) [-]
This is the most retarded ethnocentric post I have seen.

You do realize if North Korea launches nukes at America it would be devastating right.
User avatar #591 to #585 - ekiouja (04/15/2013) [-]
Their farthest reaching missile wouldn't hit the far side of japan, let alone the states.
User avatar #592 to #591 - rocksteady (04/19/2013) [-]
You can drop a missile from a plane.

I even think... oh yes that's right, it's been done before in every major war.
#534 - Rascal (03/09/2013) [-]
Goodbye funny junk after seeing so many ******* reposts I'm off to 4chan hopefully sometime I might be back when you sort you'r **** together thanks goodbye
#515 - Rascal (03/09/2013) [-]
I love america, sometimes the patriotism gets out of hand but that's probably the media putting you in the spotlight a bit much, only picking the bad things and such... I'd love to live in america my perception is my accent would get me dem bitchez[
User avatar #533 to #515 - icametocomment (03/09/2013) [-]
Well, our government is currently being a lazy bunch of squabbling fags who couldn't agree on which way to run if a train was coming at them, but hey, we've got free speech and no dictators.

As for your accent, it depends on where you're from.
User avatar #500 - UberAndrew (03/09/2013) [-]
I doubt North Korea would actually start anything, they'd have to realize they'd be starting a war they couldn't win.
Even though the world likes to joke about America they are not someone you want to go to war with, the 'war' wouldn't take very long at all.
#517 to #500 - Rascal (03/09/2013) [-]
Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.......
I disagree ^
your record of meddling is quite impressive though, WWI WWII etc.
America would kick N.Korea's ass though, yes.
User avatar #539 to #517 - warlike (03/09/2013) [-]
Stupid anon, America won the war in Iraq. They killed Saddam and set up a new gov. Win.

And as for meddling, without our support in WWI or WWII, there would've been a very slim chance of the Allies winning.
#499 - juha (03/09/2013) [-]
deal with it
User avatar #452 - jimboismynameo (03/09/2013) [-]
the real problem is not N.Korea itself.....but all its big friends....like China and Russia

take those two out of the equation and storming N.Korea would not be such a big deal
#478 to #452 - Rascal (03/09/2013) [-]
China and Russia will only help if we attack first. They're only allied for defence not offence. If they start **** first, they wont help them.
0
#375 - superniggermonkey has deleted their comment [-]
0
#374 - craazhy has deleted their comment [-]
0
#371 - threeeighteen has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #349 - cycloneclone (03/09/2013) [-]
In 10 million years some sort of intelligent life of some sort will find the artifacts of 8 billion humans and see that they all went extinct due to some sort of nuclear war that went on the that the World had gotten to a point where they hated each other so much that they killed each other. How in the hell did they **** up that bad?
User avatar #325 - johnnyiscool (03/09/2013) [-]
I doubt that joke of a country will get that far.
User avatar #216 - AnomynousUser ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
The problem isn't North Korea, it's China...
User avatar #271 to #216 - Crusader (03/09/2013) [-]
You mean the guys that are basically "Yeah, sit down Korea, I like you, but not that much" and are trying to cut off ties?
User avatar #304 to #216 - goodguygary (03/09/2013) [-]
not really, i mean, go to any store and look at where most of the stuff was made.
User avatar #209 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
then china
#219 to #209 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
That's a good point. Although, I think that China agrees with America on the trade sanctions (what caused N.K to threaten nukes). As long as China agrees with America, It won't happen, or it would be REALLY REALLY STUPID if N.K did. And here's why.
China is right above N.K, South Korea is right below. While Chinese troops move in from the North, American troops along with South Korean troops could move in from the south. North Korea would basically be CORNERED and would either have to surrender to whatever the **** terms the "allies" made, or have the country name of North Korea completely gone, and renamed something more democratic.
Also, during the Korean War, China was the only country stopping U.S forces from pushing N.K back further. That bright idea was the idea of General MacArthur's, but President Eisenhower declined claiming it would start a World War 3 if we got into China from N.K. Also, MacArthur was eventually fired because of that too.
User avatar #233 to #219 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i am enlightened, thank you.
#234 to #233 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
No one ever wants to debate International Relations / Foreign Affairs with me.
#249 to #234 - anaklusmos (03/09/2013) [-]
Do you think that this BS with North Korea is actually a big deal? I mean they threatened us sure but I think the media is throwing the whole thing out of proportion. They don't have the missiles capable of carrying out their threat and if they did (which would suck since I live in DC) the repercussions would be infinitely worse for them. We're not Japan, we've been prepared for a Nuclear war for years. We'd wipe NK off the map.
#259 to #249 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
They don't have the missiles to travel from N.K to Washington D.C, that's true. But what's stopping them from getting a Destroyer Naval ship, load a couple nukes on there and getting 90 miles or so off the U.S coastline? I'm sure that America would sink the Destroyer before anything could happen but it's probably a legit threat. Also, America doesn't know for sure if N.K has ICBM"s or not, we sure think they don't but, there might be underground launch facilities in N.K that drones can't fly over. America is unsure of the threat they actually pose, it's probably not big, but it might be
User avatar #236 to #234 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i would, but i dont know much about NK, anyway when do you think the war with NK start will if their even is one.
#243 to #236 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Well, I think China would have to be against us for N.K even to consider launching their toys at us. China isn't going to want to go into a direct conflict/war with America since we import a lot of goods from China. It would damage their economy too much. With that being said, I think that it's a very very small chance of Kim Jung launching his nukes at the U.S. Although, he might do something to S.K (like launch a nuke) but that would still be really really risky because the U.S would have troops to S.K within days to back them and with S.K/American troops along with China pushing from the North down, N.K would be kinda squeezed in the middle.

Maybe N.K might sign a treaty with Iran and then with a couple hundred thousand more troops than America and two countries with growing developmental capabilities for Nuclear weapons. Iran (since it would be closer) would launch one at America, while N.K launches a nuke at S.K. That might be a possible scenario to me i would think.
User avatar #255 to #243 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
You'd assume China wouldnt go to war with the U.S but i feel since we are moving into syria China and Russia wouldnt mind joining North Korea
#264 to #255 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
If China and Russia joined N.K, that would be World War III. Also, the Axis powers (China, Russia, N.K) would easily out number U.S troops by a few million. The U.S homeland would very likely to be invaded, we would get a few nukes thrown our way, The U.S would throw some of their nukes. One world power simply cannot take two world powers along with more allies. It'd be over before it even started. Keep in mind that N.K doesn't have ICBM"s but both China and Russia do.
User avatar #268 to #264 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
Im guessing if the whole WWIII were to happen we would have to have help so we'd call upon Britain and Canada would help us get rid of the invaders. We'd probably back out of South Korea and let them deal with north while Britain and the U.S go to war with Russia and China
#274 to #268 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Britain would be a vital allie if U.S had gotten into World War III. It is a really scary thought knowing all of this can potentially happen and all the countries (U.S, G.B, China, Russia) all have nuclear capabilities. The only thing that could even have a slight chance of saving the entire world from total destruction would be the world leaders come together, get their **** together, and disassemble all of their nukes.
China launches one at D.C, America, Russia launches one in a big city along the west coast. Russian + Chinese troops move in to invade our homeland they would need to secure a small portion of our homeland (probably one of the nuke areas) G.B along with American troops would back the Axis troops out of their secure area after (probably months of fighting) with jets and tanks rolling in.

To me, it would be like "My toy is bigger than yours game" where the world power with the biggest and baddest toy wins. If you think about it, there's more countries that are against the U.S or Communist than there are with the U,S.
Let's say G.B acts as 4 regular countries, there's probably 16 countries that would be against the U.S.

User avatar #277 to #274 - agonizingkingjake (03/09/2013) [-]
I know thats the scary part and if it happens itd be the nuclear fallout that would probably leave the human race extinct. But i think the "upcoming civil war" in the U.S would also cause a cease in fighting
#559 to #277 - tyroneisanigger (03/09/2013) [-]
Upcoming Civil war? Go on?
User avatar #581 to #559 - agonizingkingjake (03/10/2013) [-]
Well with the upcoming economic collapse and the government trying to take guns its just a matter of time before a civil war occurs
couple links if you wanna read up
www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/were-now-one-step-closer-to-america-coming-civil-war/
americanlivewire.com/will-there-be-a-civil-war-2013/
User avatar #256 to #243 - agooodname (03/09/2013) [-]
i see what your saying, china wouldnt likely attack us because we owe them tons of money any they cant collect their money once they attack us. As for NK once their country starts to crumble which it will eventually i think its very likely that they launch what nukes they have at SK and invade SK again. then we get involved, its the Korean war all over again.
User avatar #166 - ChocolateWaffles (03/09/2013) [-]
Wait a second, I swear I recognize this artwork from somewhe-
COLLECTED CURIOS HOLY ****
User avatar #161 - dagreatmax (03/09/2013) [-]
Can someone with mad photoshop skills change the mini nuke for TPB and make it go in the leg. I'm bad at photoshopping
 Friends (0)