x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#221 - jitterz (02/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#205 - mikoli (02/04/2013) [-]
What Pokemon will look like never.
#145 - fizzor (02/04/2013) [-]
That looks mighty fine. I'd buy that 			****		.
That looks mighty fine. I'd buy that **** .
User avatar #142 - sasa (02/04/2013) [-]
Achieved with CryEngine 3 :D ?
#139 - themilk (02/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#67 - donmegamuffin (02/04/2013) [-]
I'm certain this was done using UDK...
#31 - Plagus (02/04/2013) [-]
mfw
mfw
#15 - speedyonbiscuit (02/04/2013) [-]
That is not at all what it will look like, it's a made by a fan with the unreal engine.   
   
Soooo, this will only happen if gamefreak starts using the unreal engine
That is not at all what it will look like, it's a made by a fan with the unreal engine.

Soooo, this will only happen if gamefreak starts using the unreal engine
+1
#233 - jtdoggs **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #210 - angeloidsforte (02/04/2013) [-]
If i am correct then this was done in UDK. Considering the background.
User avatar #215 to #210 - imalex (02/04/2013) [-]
far cry 3
User avatar #91 - dreamthrow (02/04/2013) [-]
Achieved with CryEngine 3
#86 - Animeandcoffee (02/04/2013) [-]
This is what 10 years did for graphics, and at the exponential rate of growth we've followed in the last 20 years with video games, I don't know that we can really imagine how amazing graphics will be by then.
#89 to #86 - mctrollston (02/04/2013) [-]
By then I think video games will be a hell of a lot more interactive too.
#101 to #86 - jinkazama (02/04/2013) [-]
They won't improve much past what we have already. Video games cost money to make. Way more than they used to. And a lot of games don't even break even. See darksiders 2. Awesome game. Tons of sales. They actually made a loss on it. Unfortunate but true.
#105 to #101 - Animeandcoffee (02/04/2013) [-]
I strongly believe costs will go down, a positive side effect of the very unfortunate education bubble, highly skilled and qualified people will be working for much less.
#82 - matthlord (02/04/2013) [-]
Mfw I notice this was made in UDK.
+1
#66 - kanade **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44 - whycanticaps (02/04/2013) [-]
Medieval RPG based in the world of Pokemon? I'd play that
#191 - anon (02/04/2013) [-]
We could have Pokemon look like that right now. This is how ' ******* games will look in 10 years. Nintendo just sucks,
User avatar #204 to #191 - sketchE (02/04/2013) [-]
nintendo has never focused on graphics. theyve always been about the games. they kind of snubbed hardcore gamers with the wii but it still had some great games on it like brawl. the WII U although dorky shows they care about the gamers and are trying to make up for lost time.
User avatar #164 - dapape (02/04/2013) [-]
If it takes till im 31 for pokemon to look like that I might as well just end my life now
User avatar #167 to #164 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
You're never too old to play games, mate. So long as you don't let them get in the way of your responsibilities, but that should be the case at every age.

Source: a 43-year old who enjoys games.
User avatar #169 to #167 - dapape (02/04/2013) [-]
I was actually trying to reference the fact that the content would probably look like **** in ten years
User avatar #171 to #169 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
Ah, I see. Well that's a bit optimistic of you... Technology in terms of graphics can't improve forever. We're probably already close to the best we can get in terms of video cards and displays, etc. We can do things that are technically better but we simply won't notice the difference past a certain point. So probably development in terms of graphics will slow down noticeably soon.
User avatar #174 to #171 - dapape (02/04/2013) [-]
We'll see... I just remember playing Ocarina of Time, seeing those graphics for the first time and being like "Dayyum, this is as good as it gets."
User avatar #175 to #174 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
That's what I felt like playing Far Cry. (The original Far Cry, which by the way still is an amazing game.)
User avatar #176 to #175 - dapape (02/04/2013) [-]
Ohohoho... Maybe in terms of looking real nice, but... I wont say anything else... :)
User avatar #178 to #176 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
To each their own opinions, hah. I strongly dislike games that others think are fantastic, and occasionally like games which somehow completely fall by the wayside.
#177 to #171 - admiralaverage (02/04/2013) [-]
I disagree, there's an incredible amount of detail that games miss out on that could make games look better, and graphics cards and displays can always get better
User avatar #179 to #177 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
They can get better, but at some point, we stop noticing the difference. Right now, for example, I play Borderlands 2. I have a very decent machine, so I can run 16x rendering (I think that's the term... right?) But when I set it to 8x rendering there's almost no difference whatsoever on screen. Maybe one object in the distance is just a tiny bit blurrier than before.
#182 to #179 - admiralaverage (02/04/2013) [-]
anisotropic filtering I think you mean.
the thing about borderlands is it's an art style, you don't need to make art have higher graphics than that. Physx on that game can need a reasonable computer to run.
Shadow effects and lighting in games are getting better all the time, displays that give better refresh rates, higher contrast among other things.
User avatar #185 to #182 - Hreidmar (02/04/2013) [-]
I suppose so. I'll admit I'm very shaky on the technicalities of computers, it's just not my area. Just from personal experience in terms of games and videos, I don't see as much difference in the higher end of the performance scale. I don't see much difference between videos rendered at 1020P and 780P, for example. And from the little I've read on the subject, that's a function of the human eye. At some point, there are just too many details for us to process.
#188 to #185 - admiralaverage (02/04/2013) [-]
I guess the way I'd look at is, if I look out of my window and say look at the park, never in a game have I seen anything that comes close to the depth and detail that you can see outside.
Trees often look flat in games or the leaves look like little black dots of outlines because they screen doesn't have enough pixels to show them properly.
#122 - Pompano (02/04/2013) [-]




They're getting there with the new games coming out in October.
#123 to #122 - Pompano (02/04/2013) [-]




Shot of the gameplay.
#131 to #123 - draukenkind (02/04/2013) [-]
pretty nice
User avatar #219 - anbieter ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
******** , it's a Project in the Unreal Engine 3
#234 to #219 - tyraxio (02/04/2013) [-]
Oh really? I thought OP build a time machine and moved himself 10 years forward in time (brought his laptop, of course) and went to the local GameShop (because GameStop just didn't really sound clingy after the massive "Stopper" incident in 2017) where he bought the newest Pokémon game, which just so happened to not require that high recommendations, took a screenshot, travelled back in time and posted it on Funnyjunk for thumbs.
Oh really? I thought OP build a time machine and moved himself 10 years forward in time (brought his laptop, of course) and went to the local GameShop (because GameStop just didn't really sound clingy after the massive "Stopper" incident in 2017) where he bought the newest Pokémon game, which just so happened to not require that high recommendations, took a screenshot, travelled back in time and posted it on Funnyjunk for thumbs.
#226 to #219 - notstill (02/04/2013) [-]
No **** sherlock
User avatar #87 - markowuzhere (02/04/2013) [-]
in 10 years nobody will care about them
User avatar #88 to #87 - anonymoose (02/04/2013) [-]
People still care about pacman, why not pokemon. It's already survived a decade and a half.
User avatar #126 to #87 - Marker ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
In 10 minutes nobody will care about you.
#144 to #87 - distor (02/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#119 to #87 - lamaswithhats (02/04/2013) [-]
TAKE THAT BACK!
TAKE THAT BACK!
 Friends (0)