x
FJ should now work well with mobile. Try it out on your mobile/tablet browser!
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#282 - erdbeerbaum (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
0
#283 to #282 - thebritishguy Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
User avatar #278 - tkfourtwoone (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Well, just to be a troll and a cynical bastard, even though it was a "lifestyle" in an archaic society, slavery actually GOT **** DONE!

Now what has homosexuality brought us? Elton dressed up in a Donald Duck suit on stage? Yeeaaaah... I'll pass.

inb4 "YOU HOMOPHOBIC FAGGET" (huehuehue), I have absolutely nothing against gays, Freddie Mercury and Rob Halford are 2 of my favorite musicians.
User avatar #280 to #278 - thebritishguy (02/04/2013) [-]
how dare you say you are not homophobic if you have no problem with the bible condemning the genocide of gay people. Also imagine if someone in your family, like your sister or mother, was a slave and you could never see them again and didn't know what was happening to they, they could even be raped and tortured! would you still tell me that slavery is necessary! re evaluate your life man
#275 - awesometwenty (02/04/2013) [-]
Actually that was Laviticus which is the older half of the bible and the laws their were wiped out with the coming of Jesus but than its also in the new half that being gay is wrong so really to the bible being gay is wrong slavery is a matter of opinion to Christians which most see as wrong
User avatar #229 - goldenglimmer (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Man, you Atheists sure are busy this week.
0
#221 - whysodamnserious **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#187 - vegetatheprince (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.   
   
Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.

Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
#185 - anonexplains (02/04/2013) [-]
Would just like to mention: Just because it's in the Bible doesn't mean the Bible is condoning it. The point of the Bible is to reveal human nature: The good, the bad, and the ugly. It shows the bad parts of humanity and the good and it also shows what life was like AT THAT TIME. Just because it's talking about slavery like the above, does not mean that's God's law or that it's what God wants. RESEARCH THE CONTEXT of the passage. Was it a law/rule of the certain area of the world? Was it a general law/rule? WHO said it?

As you may or may not know. There are believes of God in the Bible and there are NON-believers as well. There are rulers and rebels and hookers and eunuchs and so on.

Also: Old testament is old. Move on.
User avatar #174 - Soilwork (02/04/2013) [-]
"No one gives a flying **** ."

-Jesus Christ yesterday 12:30 pm
User avatar #173 - captainspankmonkey ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
Why are we still argueing about these things?
Some people believe in the Bible, others don't. Get fricking over it. Co-existence is a overlooked option.
Oh wait, this is the internet, where people do not know what "reasoning" is.
User avatar #94 - rhiaanor ONLINE (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
prettyflyforaderp look at what you ahve started.
User avatar #84 - heretofuckshitup (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The first slave owner was actually a pope and the concept really didn't fly off till a hundred years later. then slaves became super common
#87 to #86 - anonexplains (02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure people had slaves long before Christianity came about.
User avatar #83 - azraelthemage (02/04/2013) [-]
There actually was slavery in the bible. Homosexuality isn't on the other hand.
#81 - fucksalts (02/04/2013) [-]
Thanks for seeing that on It's Always Sunny.
#78 - anonexplains (02/04/2013) [-]
*roll image*
-1
#45 - lyraateit **User deleted account** Comment deleted by thebritishguy [+] (3 replies)
0
#51 to #45 - thebritishguy Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
0
#40 - whitemager **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #39 - MCPO (02/04/2013) [-]
Why can't we just have them both?
#29 - anonexplains (02/03/2013) [-]
Neither
#3 - anonexplains (02/03/2013) [-]
Now, i'm fairly certain that the exodus phrase was regarding how the Egyptians treated the Jewish slaves. Egypt is what you may refer to as an "antagonist" in exodus
#230 - terrorrizor (02/04/2013) [-]
Why is this on Front Page?
 Friends (0)