x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#282 - erdbeerbaum (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
0
#283 to #282 - thebritishguy Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
#279 - nyehsquidward (02/04/2013) [-]
Both
User avatar #278 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Well, just to be a troll and a cynical bastard, even though it was a "lifestyle" in an archaic society, slavery actually GOT **** DONE!

Now what has homosexuality brought us? Elton dressed up in a Donald Duck suit on stage? Yeeaaaah... I'll pass.

inb4 "YOU HOMOPHOBIC FAGGET" (huehuehue), I have absolutely nothing against gays, Freddie Mercury and Rob Halford are 2 of my favorite musicians.
User avatar #280 to #278 - thebritishguy (02/04/2013) [-]
how dare you say you are not homophobic if you have no problem with the bible condemning the genocide of gay people. Also imagine if someone in your family, like your sister or mother, was a slave and you could never see them again and didn't know what was happening to they, they could even be raped and tortured! would you still tell me that slavery is necessary! re evaluate your life man
User avatar #229 - goldenglimmer (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Man, you Atheists sure are busy this week.
0
#221 - whysodamnserious **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#203 - fefe (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
maybe that section of the bible meant to literally lie next to and had nothing to do with sex? wouldn't that be funny.
#198 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
NEITHER

thebritishguy what are you, some sort of dumbass? Read the book you are criticizing first.
#190 - fefe (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
niether, slaves back then werent as slaves are today. it was more like master and servant, those born wealthy, and those who had to work for money. the slavery tht came to be know by us today is much more racist and cruel.
#187 - vegetatheprince (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.   
   
Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.

Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
User avatar #173 - captainspankmonkey (02/04/2013) [-]
Why are we still argueing about these things?
Some people believe in the Bible, others don't. Get fricking over it. Co-existence is a overlooked option.
Oh wait, this is the internet, where people do not know what "reasoning" is.
#122 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
******* ******* using black people as an example of slaves ******* RASIST!!!
User avatar #84 - heretofuckshitup (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The first slave owner was actually a pope and the concept really didn't fly off till a hundred years later. then slaves became super common
#87 to #86 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure people had slaves long before Christianity came about.
User avatar #83 - azraelthemage (02/04/2013) [-]
There actually was slavery in the bible. Homosexuality isn't on the other hand.
#81 - fucksalts (02/04/2013) [-]
Thanks for seeing that on It's Always Sunny.
#63 - fefe (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Not an athiest or a christian here, but OP's personal opinions aside; the bible was completely okay with slaves and I believe there's actually a bit where it talks about how much they should cost.
#60 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
gays suck, slaves ****
(things up if they're free)
0
#40 - whitemager **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #39 - MCPO (02/04/2013) [-]
Why can't we just have them both?
#29 - fefe (02/03/2013) [-]
Neither
#230 - terrorrizor (02/04/2013) [-]
Why is this on Front Page?
 Friends (0)