Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#282 - erdbeerbaum (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
0
#283 to #282 - thebritishguy Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
#279 - nyehsquidward (02/04/2013) [-]
Both
#275 - awesometwenty (02/04/2013) [-]
Actually that was Laviticus which is the older half of the bible and the laws their were wiped out with the coming of Jesus but than its also in the new half that being gay is wrong so really to the bible being gay is wrong slavery is a matter of opinion to Christians which most see as wrong
User avatar #229 - goldenglimmer (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Man, you Atheists sure are busy this week.
#203 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
maybe that section of the bible meant to literally lie next to and had nothing to do with sex? wouldn't that be funny.
#198 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [-]
NEITHER

thebritishguy what are you, some sort of dumbass? Read the book you are criticizing first.
#190 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
niether, slaves back then werent as slaves are today. it was more like master and servant, those born wealthy, and those who had to work for money. the slavery tht came to be know by us today is much more racist and cruel.
#187 - vegetatheprince (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.   
   
Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.

Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
#185 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [-]
Would just like to mention: Just because it's in the Bible doesn't mean the Bible is condoning it. The point of the Bible is to reveal human nature: The good, the bad, and the ugly. It shows the bad parts of humanity and the good and it also shows what life was like AT THAT TIME. Just because it's talking about slavery like the above, does not mean that's God's law or that it's what God wants. RESEARCH THE CONTEXT of the passage. Was it a law/rule of the certain area of the world? Was it a general law/rule? WHO said it?

As you may or may not know. There are believes of God in the Bible and there are NON-believers as well. There are rulers and rebels and hookers and eunuchs and so on.

Also: Old testament is old. Move on.
User avatar #174 - Soilwork (02/04/2013) [-]
"No one gives a flying **** ."

-Jesus Christ yesterday 12:30 pm
User avatar #94 - rhiaanor (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
prettyflyforaderp look at what you ahve started.
User avatar #84 - heretofuckshitup (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The first slave owner was actually a pope and the concept really didn't fly off till a hundred years later. then slaves became super common
#87 to #86 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure people had slaves long before Christianity came about.
User avatar #83 - azraelthemage (02/04/2013) [-]
There actually was slavery in the bible. Homosexuality isn't on the other hand.
#81 - fucksalts (02/04/2013) [-]
Thanks for seeing that on It's Always Sunny.
#78 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [-]
*roll image*
#60 - anonymous (02/04/2013) [-]
gays suck, slaves ****
(things up if they're free)
User avatar #39 - MCPO (02/04/2013) [-]
Why can't we just have them both?
#29 - anonymous (02/03/2013) [-]
Neither
#3 - anonymous (02/03/2013) [-]
Now, i'm fairly certain that the exodus phrase was regarding how the Egyptians treated the Jewish slaves. Egypt is what you may refer to as an "antagonist" in exodus
User avatar #277 - reican (02/04/2013) [-]
well we can agree with that many who wrote the bible was arrogant, intolerant and greedy ***** .
 Friends (0)