Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
37 comments displayed.
#282 - erdbeerbaum
Reply -2
(02/04/2013) [-]
#284 to #282 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply -1
(02/04/2013) [-]
"That servant who knows his master's will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows." - Jesus (Luke 12:47)
#283 to #282 - thebritishguy [OP]
0
Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
#279 - nyehsquidward
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Both
#278 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/04/2013) [-]
Well, just to be a troll and a cynical bastard, even though it was a "lifestyle" in an archaic society, slavery actually GOT **** DONE!

Now what has homosexuality brought us? Elton dressed up in a Donald Duck suit on stage? Yeeaaaah... I'll pass.

inb4 "YOU HOMOPHOBIC FAGGET" (huehuehue), I have absolutely nothing against gays, Freddie Mercury and Rob Halford are 2 of my favorite musicians.
#280 to #278 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
how dare you say you are not homophobic if you have no problem with the bible condemning the genocide of gay people. Also imagine if someone in your family, like your sister or mother, was a slave and you could never see them again and didn't know what was happening to they, they could even be raped and tortured! would you still tell me that slavery is necessary! re evaluate your life man
#286 to #280 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE
Reply -2
(02/04/2013) [-]
- I never said I don't have any problems with the Bible (or any other religious book)
- I didn't ever said I agree with slavery
- I didn't ever said that slavery is necessary
- You obviously missed the point of my post
#288 to #286 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
what was your point then?
#275 - awesometwenty
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Actually that was Laviticus which is the older half of the bible and the laws their were wiped out with the coming of Jesus but than its also in the new half that being gay is wrong so really to the bible being gay is wrong slavery is a matter of opinion to Christians which most see as wrong
#229 - goldenglimmer
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Man, you Atheists sure are busy this week.
#233 to #229 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
I don't know why it is this week, I'm doing it because they are trying to make gay marriage illegal in the U.K and that's sparked me off
#221 - whysodamnserious **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#222 to #221 - walcorn
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Hot
#203 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
maybe that section of the bible meant to literally lie next to and had nothing to do with sex? wouldn't that be funny.
#210 to #203 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Except that makes absolutely no ******* sense, and the bible also mentions how gays won't go to heaven. Yeah, twist this **** all you want, friend.
#258 to #210 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
I was joking..... like wouldn't it be funny if the whole christian anti gay thing was due to a translation error when they translated the bible from hebrew, to ancient greek to latin then to english. some people have no sense of humour
#198 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
NEITHER

thebritishguy what are you, some sort of dumbass? Read the book you are criticizing first.
#190 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
niether, slaves back then werent as slaves are today. it was more like master and servant, those born wealthy, and those who had to work for money. the slavery tht came to be know by us today is much more racist and cruel.
#228 to #190 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
anon won't hear this but I'll write it for the rest of you, that is what slavery was like for people from Israel but it said to take them from other countries and they would have been treated badly
#187 - vegetatheprince
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.   
   
Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
It's not like the bible was written only about not allowing gays. There was maybe, 1 or 2 lines on it. They also said don't get tattoos, but people do that without thought.

Aa for slavery, it was also a book written thousands of years ago, so yea, its a bit behind the times.
#216 to #187 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
So people can only follow 1 part of the bible and ignore the other parts?
#231 to #187 - thebritishguy [OP]
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
no there isn't there 29 separate accounts were the bible is homophobic
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/gay/long.htm
#173 - captainspankmonkey
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Why are we still argueing about these things?
Some people believe in the Bible, others don't. Get fricking over it. Co-existence is a overlooked option.
Oh wait, this is the internet, where people do not know what "reasoning" is.
#171 - cowboypony
Reply -7
(02/04/2013) [-]
gay wannabe cowboy faggots. Everytime I wear my cowboy hat it's always "lolol u luk lyk ur from broekbak mntn lolololol."

I'd rather have slavery, it was better than this reverse racist society we live in today by a long shot.
#189 to #171 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
no one wants you whine you ******* brony
#122 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
******* ******* using black people as an example of slaves ******* RASIST!!!
#84 - heretofuckshitup
Reply -3
(02/04/2013) [-]
The first slave owner was actually a pope and the concept really didn't fly off till a hundred years later. then slaves became super common
#86 to #84 - heretofuckshitup
Reply -2
(02/04/2013) [-]
also it was a gift, he didn't ask for a slave and i'm sure this slave was treated somewhat better. more like an indentured servant than a slave i believe
#87 to #86 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure people had slaves long before Christianity came about.
#97 to #87 - heretofuckshitup
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
i was referring to black slaves.
#83 - azraelthemage
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
There actually was slavery in the bible. Homosexuality isn't on the other hand.
#81 - fucksalts
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Thanks for seeing that on It's Always Sunny.
#63 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
Not an athiest or a christian here, but OP's personal opinions aside; the bible was completely okay with slaves and I believe there's actually a bit where it talks about how much they should cost.
#75 to #63 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
I'm not sure why I got thumbed down. I was just stating a fact. I guess neither those nor opinions are welcome on FJ
#60 - anon
Reply 0
(02/04/2013) [-]
gays suck, slaves ****
(things up if they're free)
#29 - anon
Reply 0
(02/03/2013) [-]
Neither
#277 - reican
Reply -1
(02/04/2013) [-]
well we can agree with that many who wrote the bible was arrogant, intolerant and greedy *****.