x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #271 - usmcoorah (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Ahh...Intolerance. Regardless if you like it or not, its what makes the world go round.
User avatar #281 to #273 - thatguywhohasbacon (02/04/2013) [-]
Just gonna blast more holes in this sinking ship huh?
User avatar #237 - neoexdeath ONLINE (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Keep in mind the rules handed down where for that specific time and place. Societies evolve over time, and I'm pretty damn sure someone who came up with so many good ideas (Hey, you've gotta admit, if nothing else, this Jesus dude really made a good effort at improving peoples lives) would know that, regardless of if he's divine or not. TLDR: If it involves being a dick, don't do it, because while that may contradict some of the older stuff, it follows the overarching concept. Loving your fellow man, trying to be a better person, and leaving the world a better place then when you came into it.

Now, has for the Old Testament stuff...A lot of that **** was required just to get by. These people basically had the level of civilization of mud huts and farming. Too many people go gay? Lower birth rate, and not enough people to work the farms. Murder everybody? Same thing. Stealing? Leads to scarcity and death, and pissed off farmers pitchforking your ass, which leads to the aforementioned starvation deal from lack of farmers. There was a time and place, in the brutal past, that such laws where required...but we've evolved since then.
#199 - infinitereaper ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
Oh, oh these posts.
#167 - tommygunntyler (02/04/2013) [+] (4 replies)
anyone else think of this guy or this show?
User avatar #155 - richardastley (02/04/2013) [-]
What does the Bible say about a couple dudes holding hands? As far as I know, that Old Testament verse is about sex between men, and there's a lot of other **** in the Old Testament that Christians ignore. A minority of them just got a little picky with them and a few others agreed with them without thinking about it.
User avatar #149 - Juigiknows ONLINE (02/04/2013) [-]
"But the first testiment!!"

"21:7-11"

"When jesus said..."

Can we just stop refering to that book, love one another, and just carrry on without the hate? For **** sakes people. Shut up. Thanks.


#93 - mrsugoiman **User deleted account** (02/04/2013) [-]
And so, the internet discuses religion
And so, the internet discuses religion
0
#221 - whysodamnserious **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#203 - fefe (02/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
maybe that section of the bible meant to literally lie next to and had nothing to do with sex? wouldn't that be funny.
#200 - sirbustyabals (02/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#198 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
NEITHER

thebritishguy what are you, some sort of dumbass? Read the book you are criticizing first.
#171 - cowboypony (02/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
gay wannabe cowboy faggots. Everytime I wear my cowboy hat it's always "lolol u luk lyk ur from broekbak mntn lolololol."

I'd rather have slavery, it was better than this reverse racist society we live in today by a long shot.
#189 to #171 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
no one wants you whine you ******* brony
#122 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
******* ******* using black people as an example of slaves ******* RASIST!!!
#109 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
the bible never even mentions cowboys
User avatar #84 - heretofuckshitup (02/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
The first slave owner was actually a pope and the concept really didn't fly off till a hundred years later. then slaves became super common
#87 to #86 - fefe (02/04/2013) [-]
Pretty sure people had slaves long before Christianity came about.
User avatar #83 - azraelthemage (02/04/2013) [-]
There actually was slavery in the bible. Homosexuality isn't on the other hand.
-1
#45 - lyraateit **User deleted account** Comment deleted by thebritishguy [+] (3 replies)
0
#50 to #45 - thebritishguy Comment deleted by thebritishguy [-]
0
#40 - whitemager **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
#29 - fefe (02/03/2013) [-]
Neither
#3 - fefe (02/03/2013) [-]
Now, i'm fairly certain that the exodus phrase was regarding how the Egyptians treated the Jewish slaves. Egypt is what you may refer to as an "antagonist" in exodus
 Friends (0)