Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'fix'd' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (396)
[ 396 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#284 - elitejerkz
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
Game of Thrones is best story.
#318 to #284 - Rellik
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#307 to #284 - kingbulbasaur
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
Game of Thrones is best porn with story*.
Seriously though, **** that series. From the first book, you can already tell what's going to happen later on but they choose to drag it out for a couple books.
#324 to #307 - gothdino
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
To bad no one picks bulbasaur.
#420 to #324 - kingbulbasaur
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Red picked Bulbasaur.
#280 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
no star wars...
#282 to #280 - jokeface
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#279 - weirddark ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
#276 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
you forgot to also blank out the hunger games but what ever.
#269 - krome
Reply +4
(02/01/2013) [-]
I'm not sure why, but I got feels.
#273 to #269 - rutgers
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
same here
#262 - bersrker
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
What about me? Couldn't you put me in the pic?
What about me? Couldn't you put me in the pic?
#281 to #262 - TehFunnyMan
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
Doctor who?
Doctor who?
#259 - scotfighterz
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
For me it's LOST... "See ya in another life brotha"
#258 - scorcho
Reply +5
(02/01/2013) [-]
of all those, only lotr will be remembered throughout the centuries. the rest of them are "just movies".
#322 to #258 - kerfufflemachtwo
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
No, Harry Potter and Narnia will be remembered for a long time as well. Maybe not as long as LOTR, but they'll be around.

I do see Pirates going away in the near future. And I can't really say for certain what will happen with Hunger Games.
#264 to #258 - pariahlol
Reply +5
(02/01/2013) [-]
Harry Potter will be remembered, and The Chronicles of Narnia shall live on in book form, which in turn shall keep the movies remembered. Secondly, depending on how the rest of the series transfers to movies, I could see the hunger games going somewhere.
#252 - soggytomatoe
Reply +28
(02/01/2013) [-]
MFW Hunger games is compared to these works of art
#265 to #252 - flawns
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
MFW Hunger games is compared to these works of art
MFW Hunger games is compared to these works of art
#261 to #252 - pariahlol
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
How about, you eat a dick?
How about, you eat a dick?
#283 to #261 - soggytomatoe
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Eating a penis would be cannibalism. I am not a cannibal. I can suck a dick if that's what your implying. But I most certainly not eat a male penis.
#285 to #283 - pariahlol
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
well, do as you please, seeing as you were apparently referring to the movie, and I was referring to the book, as the picture says stories.
#248 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Not sure why this has so many thumbs. The original picture didn't have the Hunger Games or Twatlight on it. It did have Star Wars doe and something else that I can't seem to remember.
#247 - ferrettamer ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
I forget most of the Pirates of the Caribbean, most of LotR and all of the chronicles of Narnia. I only remember Harry Potter because I read it a year ago, and the Hunger Games because I read it like 1.5 years ago and watched the movie like 6 months ago (though, I don't think I'll forget the Hunger Games).
#246 - racrox
Reply +5
(02/01/2013) [-]
MFW the only one I like was Pirates... now before you all crucify me, the fantasy genre just isn't my genre, I prefer sci-fi or just hilarious adventure like Pirates. and as for Hunger Games... well, crucify for that all you want, cause that's just bad, even I know it shouldn't be among those titans.
MFW the only one I like was Pirates... now before you all crucify me, the fantasy genre just isn't my genre, I prefer sci-fi or just hilarious adventure like Pirates. and as for Hunger Games... well, crucify for that all you want, cause that's just bad, even I know it shouldn't be among those titans.
#274 to #246 - alexthebest
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
I respectfully disagree, but thumbs up for polite response backed by reasonable explanations.
#244 - therulethirtyfour
Reply -9
(02/01/2013) [-]
>harry potter is about a whiny bitch oprphan
>hunger games is about a whiny bitch half-orphan
>pirates is eh
>walking, walking, walking
>narnia is eh
>twilight is about a whiny bitch half-orphan

Sorry, but I've read all of the above and frankly none of them really stuck with me.

>inb4 red thumb ********* from all of the respective fans
>inb4 what does stick with me
-Hitchhikers Guide, Shakespeare's Comedies/Tragedies (**** the history plays), Bradbury, King's Dark Tower
#305 to #244 - tenthdivine
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
>therulethirtyfour is a whiny bitch orphan that thinks he's cool and edgy for hating what most people love and not caring about red thumbs

Kill yourself, please.
#429 to #305 - therulethirtyfour
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Since when did having an opinion become edgy? I don't like a few popular book/movie series. I do enjoy other popular series.

You have me on the red thumbs part. I seriously don't care.
#260 to #244 - ayero
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
You read the Lord of the Rings and you got... Walking?...
#255 to #244 - TuccessfulSroll
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
Back it up, when did Harry ever complain? Last I checked, he lived under the stairs and was content to be alive. I understand you don't like the story, but I have to ask.
#238 - mkchillin
Reply +15
(02/01/2013) [-]
I guess I'm the only one who cherishes the Star War films...
#291 to #238 - asleepyplatypus
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Maybe put Star Wars in last frame?
#266 to #238 - rockerrocksixty
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
don't worry, we're all a little peeved starwars wasn't in there
#235 - Sinless
Reply +3
(02/01/2013) [-]
The Hunger Games were very terrible books.

You could tell that the author was shocked the first book became successful, and ran out of ways to continue the story by the third book. First book, okay lets get a bunch of kids together and kill them. Second book, uhhh okay I guess we can throw them back in to kill eachother again. Third book, I guess we can't really do it a third time let's just throw them into the capitol city which is set up with traps just like the arena was.

Spoiler Alert
And let's just randomly kill off a main character by having her throw herself into a dangerous situation with absolutely no back story of how she got there.
#242 to #235 - racrox
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#234 - BmanX ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
Pirates feels like the odd one out here. Only one not based on a book. It's based on a friggin amusement park ride! Still, damn fine films, IMO.
#237 to #234 - bababad
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
They were OK, though i doubt that they will be remembered 10 years from now. Though I  CERTAINLY doubt people will remember Hunger Games, for those that don't believe me google the movie Battle Royale.
They were OK, though i doubt that they will be remembered 10 years from now. Though I CERTAINLY doubt people will remember Hunger Games, for those that don't believe me google the movie Battle Royale.
#241 to #237 - BmanX ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Probably true for most, but I think I'll remember them. It's one of my favourite series of film. And the difference with Battle Royale is that if you're not into Japanese films, it's not gonna appeal to you. Plus, it doesn't have Jennifer Lawrence. That's always a plus.
#243 to #241 - bababad
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I suppose, but eye candy always hardens...and when it does only the old enjoy it....in retrospect i doubt ill remember the narnia movies either...but i still cherish the books.
#312 to #243 - BmanX ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I never watched the Narnia movies. The only reason I want to is because Liam Neeson voices Aslan. Otherwise, I don't really care for them.
#230 - awalkingdisaster **User deleted account**
+14
has deleted their comment [-]
#231 to #230 - anon
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
>narnia
no
#236 to #231 - tocoolforyouinajar
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I rather liked Narnia. But only the first book, the others were sucky and badly put together
I rather liked Narnia. But only the first book, the others were sucky and badly put together
#249 to #236 - churrundo
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
You did not say that about the Narnia books.
#232 to #231 - awalkingdisaster **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#225 - TehFunnyMan
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
But it does stay with us.

Like herpes.

In fact herpes has a Twilight poster up on its wall, because one day it aspires to be as clingy as Twilight.
#239 to #225 - derpybestpony
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
a thumb for you good sir
#224 - illusiveman
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Nope, none of them stayed.
#223 - shredmaster
Reply +12
(02/01/2013) [-]
Hunger Games lumped in with Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings? Lord of the ******* Rings?

I'm sorry, but no. I question whether Harry Potter can stand up to LOTR, let alone the ******* Hunger Games. Hit me with red thumbs, go.
#263 to #223 - ayero
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
At least, at the very least they didn't include Eragon/Inheritance.
#417 to #263 - shredmaster
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
You mean Lord of the Wheel of Star Potter?
#419 to #417 - ayero
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Exactly! If you write a plot description, you end up with Star Wars, and if you do a spread sheet of the names, you get Lord of the Rings and Wheel of Time -_- Not to mention the plot inconsistencies.... It's what happens when a 15 year old tries to write 4 books over a span of some 8 years, then publish them all separately.
#428 to #419 - shredmaster
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Personally, I think that whenever he writes anything for the Inheritance series, he opens four books: LOTR, Star Wars, Wheel of Time, and Harry Potter. Then he skims through all of them, smashes ideas together, and sells a billion copies.
#227 to #223 - theism ONLINE
Reply +6
(02/01/2013) [-]
The Hunger Games were honestly horrible books.
#250 to #227 - roflnaut
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
The characters were as flat as Kansas, and the main character was bland as ****.
I regret reading them.
#229 to #227 - shredmaster
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
To be fair, I've never read all of them, just some of the first one, but I don't think I need to read all of them to know they they're not classics, especially not on the level of Lord of the Rings.
#226 to #223 - HeeroYuy
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Agreed.