Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#63 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
The only thing jpg is good for is people with slow internets
#61 - captainwow
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Jesus Christ, FJ will bitch about anything.
#62 to #61 - vilememory
Reply +9
(01/31/2013) [-]
How dare you bring up the fact that we will bitch about anything! That makes me so mad, I'm not only going to bitch about it! But I'm going to make a channel about it as well! I'll call it the bitching about stuff channel!
#66 to #62 - Xyhpon
Reply +4
(01/31/2013) [-]
How dare you bitch about him bitching about us bitching! That very comment makes me so angry I'm going to upload content about people bitching about other people bitching that we bitch!
#75 to #66 - josephkirk
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
stop bitching about his bitching for bitching about us bitching
#53 - megazman
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
So im not much of a computer guy other than the hours i spend looking at silly cats on the internet, could someone explain the differences and/or pros and cons of PNG and JPEG?   
have a Spiderman for your trouble
So im not much of a computer guy other than the hours i spend looking at silly cats on the internet, could someone explain the differences and/or pros and cons of PNG and JPEG?
have a Spiderman for your trouble
#56 to #53 - lip
Reply -1
(01/31/2013) [-]
The side of the guy arguing for .png is saved to look like a .png file...
Smooth and crisp.

Where as the .jpg guy looks like it was saved as a .jpg...
blurry and lossey
#54 to #53 - lyiat
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Without going into massive details, typically PNG have much higher resolutions and are of higher quality., while JPEGs are smaller and take up less memory.
#76 to #54 - mcfunkdaddy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
wrong for the most part.
#69 to #54 - lateday
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
But why?
#52 - orostheavengerx
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Sooo, does bitmap have any useful purpose?
#59 to #52 - redeadhunter
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
In indie games (going mostly by SCP Containment Breach here), it tends to be what the programmers use to define textures.
#47 - timbalisto
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
For some reason this reminded me of the argument between PC and Mac.
#48 to #47 - generic
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
kinda, but this one has easier accessed evidence.
#50 to #48 - timbalisto
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
That's a good point. I guess one will never be completely better, just different. Oh ****, my name is blue now, I wonder when that happened.
#51 to #50 - generic
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
been on fj for like over a year or something.
#46 - fiddyone
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I was thought that - JPEG is better for more colours (For example: Camera images) and PNG's are better for less colours, also take less space most of the time, which is helpful in web design
#82 to #46 - mcfunkdaddy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
nah.
#42 - Temperance
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Let's not forget PNG's incredible ability to keep an image's transparency. ******* JPEG just makes it white.
#37 - mikemont
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
I never save anything in any format but the default.
#39 to #37 - thepalmtoptiger
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
That's fine when you're just uploading random **** to the internet, but when you're using GIMP or Photoshop then it is kind of a big deal because you want to retain your layers.
#40 to #39 - mikemont
Reply -7
(01/31/2013) [-]
#43 to #40 - thepalmtoptiger
Reply +3
(01/31/2013) [-]
One day you'll use a more advanced image processor and you'll look back on this day and think "What an asshole, the default format for this program saves everything anyway!"
#36 - Zaivia
Reply +4
(01/31/2013) [-]
PNGs just look so much cleaner.
#84 to #36 - mcfunkdaddy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
arghghhg my bandwidth
#49 to #36 - generic
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It's more than a look.
#35 - superacecar **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#32 - smokedmeatlog
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Why would you ever use .jpg than?
#38 to #32 - noschool
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
A JPG is a lossy compressed file format this makes it useful for storing photographs at a smaller size than other formats JPGs are a common choice for use on the Web because it is compressed while PNGs are for line art, text-heavy images, and images with few colors.
#29 - fourthusername
Reply +26
(01/31/2013) [-]
long live full HD 1080p
#149 to #29 - trojanmannn
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
the irony is that your picture is a PNG
#41 to #29 - wearethefunny
Reply +8
(01/31/2013) [-]
#25 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
if people saved their jpegs at highest quality there wouldn't be any problems
#44 to #25 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Only Photoshop has a quality option for jpegs.
#186 to #44 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
So does GIMP, Blender, After Effects, Flash, and a lot of other graphics programs. I can only think of MS Paint as a widely used image program that doesn't have that option.
#187 to #186 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Ok, GIMP is just a wannabe Photoshop and Blender, After Effects and Flash aren't even the same cathegory of software (added to which that the latter two are also produced by Adobe and often packaged together with Photoshop).
For commonly used image editing software that don't have it, there's Paint.Net, Paint Tool SAI, Picaza, Paintshop Pro and countless others.
#190 to #187 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
All the programs I listed are very widely used and specialize in different types of images, for example Blender is primarily 3D whereas Flash is used for vexel and cartoon graphics. GIMP is only modeled after Photoshop because the latter defined the industry; GIMP is damn good at what it does and it's open source to boot.

As for those programs you listed, from what I've seen SAI does in fact have quality settings. Painshop Pro has compression levels, which is essentially the same feature inverted. As for those other two, I must have the wrong link because You need to login to view this link appears to be a website about studio paint, and Picasa is pretty much instagram for the PC so I don't doubt it's light on features.
#191 to #190 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link is the name of the software, the reason for the suffix is because it's part of the You need to login to view this link framework, it's actually downloaded at getpaint.net
#192 to #191 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
This appears to have a jpeg quality feature as well.
#193 to #192 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Wrong, that "Dithering" or whatever thing is there to lower quality, and it works for any format. You can't use it to improve jpeg quality, the highest setting is equivalent to a standard quality.
#205 to #193 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
I think we may be thinking of different functions.

(these are in fact the save settings for jpeg format)
#208 to #205 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Never noticed. Must be because I always use .png.
#209 to #208 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
Yep, you, uh... you've got me there, I guess.
#210 to #209 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
No, no, you were the one that got me. You were right after all, I just said why I was mistaken.
#213 to #210 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Alright, sorry, it just looked like you were being antagonistic there.
#214 to #213 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
And now you're apologizing for trying to hand me your victory. Have some pride, man, this was your victory.
#215 to #214 - pseudobob **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Well I don't want to rub it in your face, and it's not like I'm suddenly right in the end. I was always right :) hue hue hue anyway to be honest I've got to hand it to you, admitting defeat is not something I am usually able to do. When someone else does it I'm obligated to give them some respect, being a better man and all. Although not necessarily the correct man!

I hope you aren't leaving this with any sour feelings. If there's one thing we should always be neutral on, it's computers.
#216 to #215 - TheMather ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Of course not, I'll readily accept my defeat. It was my own fault for talking about something I hadn't completely familiarized myself with.
#24 - furdabip
Reply +3
(01/31/2013) [-]
#23 - herpesboy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
battle field forced me to make my logo for my server in jpeg. =(
#22 - scarasm
Reply +25
(01/31/2013) [-]
**** yeah PNG!!!!
#30 to #22 - kiratheunholy
Reply +81
(01/31/2013) [-]
#128 to #30 - funnyjunknsfwsecti
Reply +7
(01/31/2013) [-]
(Psst: It's the flag of Papua New Guinea.)
#141 to #128 - greenmurderer
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
oh, that's clever
#18 - blasthardcheese
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I got marked down on ICT coursework because I used PNGs instead of **** quality JPEGs.
#16 - nazidinosaur
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
... TIFF all the way
#15 - thechosentroll
Reply +14
(01/31/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I preffer PNG files because they let me make **** like this. Mouse over the comment.
#28 to #15 - workitout
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
Or this.
#34 to #28 - galkawhm
Reply +3
(01/31/2013) [-]
Or maybe this?   
   
(Oh wait, this is a gif)
Or maybe this?

(Oh wait, this is a gif)
#33 to #28 - mcatheistnuggets
Reply +4
(01/31/2013) [-]
or this.
#45 to #33 - evilpapagali
Reply +4
(01/31/2013) [-]
Or this.
#12 - anon
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
You can't tage png images in your picture library.