Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#404 - rplix
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
The Harry Potter one was pretty interesting.
#406 to #404 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
its only a plot hole in the movies
in the book rowling explains it away i believe in five, the attack on the ministry destroyed all the timeclocks
#425 to #404 - stanleys
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
I think the reason that they dont use time turners for large past events is because they only work one way, so say if you used it to go back 2 months, you would be stuck in that time hiding until your future self goes to the past
#322 - bionicsheep
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
didn't they say that they destroyed the timeturners in the harry potter books? i havent read them in a while, so i could be mistaken
#259 - deadmuerto
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
anyone?
#262 to #259 - jerrywolf
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
That was a really bad movie.
#178 - agitatedscientist
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
There are two schools of thought concerning time travel. The more traditional approach would be that when a time traveler goes back, he can change the events of history. In this version of time travel, there never was a time traveler anywhere in history until the first one moved from his own time period. This would be exemplified in Back to the Future.

The second theory would be that the events of time cannot be changed. The time traveler tries to prevent or cause something, but inadvertently causes history to repeat itself in the exact same manner or fails to change anything at all. The time traveler was always present at this point in time, as well as their starting point.

The Time Turner is based on the second theory. Buckbeak was saved the first time around, but they had to go back in time to be there. The Potter's deaths were in itself proof that no one used a time turner to save them, or no one succeeded in saving them when they did use the time turner. Therefor, it would be useless to try to use the time turner to save them, as it would be theoretically impossible, even with magic.

There is a reason they let a young student use the thing. In all reality it's just a toy.
#183 to #178 - churrundo
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
it's one is travling through the fifth dimension, the other is traveling in the fourth
#129 - KungFuZerO
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
I always thought the T-rex pushed them off a cliff that was on the opposite side of the road as the T-rex enclosure. because i dont think think the camera ever shows that side, since its always focused on the rex.
#181 to #129 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It's shown when the balding guy runs into the little restroom on the other side of the road. The T-Rext proceeds to smash le bathroom and eat him. The more you know!
#472 - plaruti
Reply +1
(02/05/2013) [-]
Ok Jaffar undid Aladin's wish when he got his power!

you dont remember that scene in the castle? sheesh
#461 - ilovedidyoupiggy
Reply +1
(02/01/2013) [-]
watchin jurassic park while seeing this
#430 - stonerjesus
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Seriously? Don't you idiots know a T-Rex is capable of limited levitation? How do you think they got around that whole "I have a big head and tiny arms" spiel? Levitation, man. ******* dinosaurs, and their black magic faggotry
#326 - rhblink
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
the harry potter one is explained. if u actually read the books you'd know that all the time turners got destroyed in the 5th book
#291 - Tyranitar
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
If you watched Prisoner of Azkaban, you would know that the timeline already takes time travel into consideration. Everything, including running off with Buckbeak and Harry rescuing himself and Sirius from Dementors, had already occurred in the timeline before they traveled back. All the time-turner does is actually allow them to go back and ensure the events take place (and since they did occur in the past, that means they WILL choose to go back and cause it at some point).
#290 - berrypie **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#324 to #290 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
So his tactics for dealing with enemies that can obviously defeat him is to stand still? He did it on key with everybody else, nobody told him to do it, he didn't hide behind a wall, but stood still out in the open. If he thought he wasn't a toy, and instead a space ranger, why would he just stay still? He doesn't stay still when he sees Zurg. If every time a soldier saw an enemy, he stayed still in open sight, he would be ******* dead. The **** Buzz?
#275 - kokanium **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#268 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
As for the jurassic park one, the T rex entered on the Goat side, which was level ground, then pushed the car toward the other side with the wall. It's not the same side.
#201 - mrdarp
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
@#8: If you think about it for a minute, it is ALWAYS "after midnight". Gif not related.
@#8: If you think about it for a minute, it is ALWAYS "after midnight". Gif not related.
#195 - lillpip
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Dear SonicTeam.

HA! Told you it'd get front page.
You owe me a beer.
#462 to #195 - SonicTeam [OP]
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
You drink?
#463 to #462 - lillpip
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Occasionally.
#466 to #463 - SonicTeam [OP]
Reply +1
(02/05/2013) [-]
I did not know that.
#467 to #466 - lillpip
Reply 0
(02/05/2013) [-]
Now you know.
#468 to #467 - SonicTeam [OP]
Reply +1
(02/05/2013) [-]
It's cool. I only drink socially.
#469 to #468 - lillpip
Reply 0
(02/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, I really don't drink too much. Only a beer or so whenever I'm watching TV, or reading or something.
#470 to #469 - SonicTeam [OP]
Reply +1
(02/05/2013) [-]
I drink when I go out to the casinos. I start off with a Spicy Bloody Mary, then 2 Bud Light Limes, then another Bloody Mary. XD
#471 to #470 - lillpip
Reply 0
(02/05/2013) [-]
Lol, I only ever drink Blue Moon, not a huge fan of alcohol in general, but I do like that.

I've tried a Bloody Mary, but I'm not a huge fan of tomatoes, so eh.
#473 to #471 - SonicTeam [OP]
Reply +1
(02/05/2013) [-]
Everyone has their tastes. :3
#144 - tanglenose
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure that I wouldn't remember that much about a kid I only knew for a week for thirty years.
#148 to #144 - eros **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#139 - supersnake
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
martys mum...
martys mum...
#128 - galahads
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
For the Waterworld one, wasn't it the writing that was valuable, not just the paper, granted paper was most likely rare, but the writing is what was used to translate the tattoo, making it the valuable part =D
#133 to #128 - coolchalkyxxx
Reply -1
(01/30/2013) [-]
No paper meant trees, trees meant land. That's why paper was so valuable.
#149 to #128 - eros **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#100 - jimmdean
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
So. *******. Tired. Of. Explaining. The. Time-Turner
#91 - therealwaynebrady
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
the gremlin one is kind of a stretch
#143 to #91 - aiicii
Reply -2
(01/30/2013) [-]
but it does work without the "somewhere" part
#161 to #143 - therealwaynebrady
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
it's still just a rat loophole. The whole point was that you couldn't feed the at night, the other posts are actually plotholes, this one was just sort of twisting the words that they said in the movie
#169 to #161 - aiicii
Reply -2
(01/30/2013) [-]
midnight is considered to be at 0:00 so there is no loophole. if the point they were trying to get across was to not feed it at night, why did they say not to feed it after midnight? people should say what they mean so others wouldn't think that they mean what they say.