Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#191 - xxabbiexx
Reply +3
(01/31/2013) [-]
Aladdin: He didn't want to keep the genie to become a prince again, he didn't think he could pull it off by himself, and wanted to keep his last wish just in case something went wrong and he needed it. and He didn't worry about marrying Jasmine, he worried about lying to her for the rest of their life and her finding out and hating him for it.
Aladdin: He didn't want to keep the genie to become a prince again, he didn't think he could pull it off by himself, and wanted to keep his last wish just in case something went wrong and he needed it. and He didn't worry about marrying Jasmine, he worried about lying to her for the rest of their life and her finding out and hating him for it.
#97 - conordalymcr
Reply +3
(01/30/2013) [-]
You can't use the time-turner to go back in time and alter things in the past.
Did you read the book?
#136 to #97 - coolchalkyxxx
Reply -2
(01/30/2013) [-]
Cough* Buckbeak. *cough
#185 to #136 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Buckbeak never died *******. In the movie when it shows the axeman swinging his axe down and crows flying away, he's actually splitting a big ol' pumpkin.
#159 to #136 - anon
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
Buckbeak never died?
#411 - stopeatingshit
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
goodbye childhood...
#404 - rplix
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
The Harry Potter one was pretty interesting.
#406 to #404 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
its only a plot hole in the movies
in the book rowling explains it away i believe in five, the attack on the ministry destroyed all the timeclocks
#425 to #404 - stanleys
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
I think the reason that they dont use time turners for large past events is because they only work one way, so say if you used it to go back 2 months, you would be stuck in that time hiding until your future self goes to the past
#322 - bionicsheep
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
didn't they say that they destroyed the timeturners in the harry potter books? i havent read them in a while, so i could be mistaken
#266 - richardastley
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
The Santa Clause one always annoyed the **** out of me. It happens in every "Kids should believe in Santa" movie. It's ******* retarded.
#263 - robotzombie
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
BTTF: Marty actually ****** his mom and leaves, she keeps it a secret but doesnt wanna be stuck with fatherless child so she marries his "dad"
#259 - deadmuerto
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
anyone?
#262 to #259 - jerrywolf
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
That was a really bad movie.
#228 - guidoforlife
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
you shut your whore mouth about Air Bud!!!
#215 - Cambro
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
#10: A. Deaths are fixed points in time and B. It creates paradoxes that makes preventing the death from happening unpredictable anyway.
If you really want a Harry Potter plot hole, there is this one: Hermione had a purse that was bottomless and weightless no matter how much was stored inside of it. At the beginning of the deathly hallows, she could have stowed Harry away and travel without any issue. George didn't have to lose his ear and Mad Eye didn't have to die.
#221 to #215 - Shitthatscrazy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
Logic Hole: if the purse is bottomless then how the **** can she find harrry before he dies of thirst or hunger. If you say your wrong about it being bottomless then how will harry surive being in there with all this other stuff flying around and killing him?
#232 to #221 - seajayjoonyo
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
He worded it wrong. It's not bottomless, it's just an undetectable expansion charm, making the purse larger than normal, but not huge. Hermione can still reach the bottom of her purse.
#233 to #232 - Shitthatscrazy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
that only answers half my point
#237 to #233 - seajayjoonyo
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It should have answered your entire point. It's not a really HUGE purse. Harry couldn't fit inside it, therefore couldn't die in it if he couldn't get in it in the first place.
#241 to #237 - Shitthatscrazy
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
#198 - kinglobster
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
Number 1: He doesn't want to blow his cover as a Space Ranger. The natives to the planet (humans) are very big compared to him and they could easily kill him if they ever found out he was invading Earth. The toys are more on his level, so he interacts with them.
#182 - astronautjezus
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
They are movies, what did you expect?
#178 - agitatedscientist
Reply +2
(01/31/2013) [-]
There are two schools of thought concerning time travel. The more traditional approach would be that when a time traveler goes back, he can change the events of history. In this version of time travel, there never was a time traveler anywhere in history until the first one moved from his own time period. This would be exemplified in Back to the Future.

The second theory would be that the events of time cannot be changed. The time traveler tries to prevent or cause something, but inadvertently causes history to repeat itself in the exact same manner or fails to change anything at all. The time traveler was always present at this point in time, as well as their starting point.

The Time Turner is based on the second theory. Buckbeak was saved the first time around, but they had to go back in time to be there. The Potter's deaths were in itself proof that no one used a time turner to save them, or no one succeeded in saving them when they did use the time turner. Therefor, it would be useless to try to use the time turner to save them, as it would be theoretically impossible, even with magic.

There is a reason they let a young student use the thing. In all reality it's just a toy.
#183 to #178 - churrundo
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
it's one is travling through the fifth dimension, the other is traveling in the fourth
#154 - leveltwowizard
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
If midnight is the beginning of each day, then wouldn't it be after midnight all the time?
#147 - alekksandar
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
because t-rex is awesome and he can do whatever the **** he wants
#129 - KungFuZerO
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
I always thought the T-rex pushed them off a cliff that was on the opposite side of the road as the T-rex enclosure. because i dont think think the camera ever shows that side, since its always focused on the rex.
#181 to #129 - anon
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
It's shown when the balding guy runs into the little restroom on the other side of the road. The T-Rext proceeds to smash le bathroom and eat him. The more you know!
#104 - solarisofcelestia
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
That one about Air Bud reminded me of the football themed movie. That dog got tackled and probably broke a rib. I didn't like dogs back then the way I do now.
#119 to #104 - spoonandfork
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**spoonandfork rolled a random image posted in comment #2724710 at FJ RPG **
#123 to #104 - princeofbrokensoul
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**princeofbrokensoul rolled a random image posted in comment #460634 at Anime & Manga **
#124 to #104 - grenadeshrapnel
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**grenadeshrapnel rolled a random image posted in comment #477314 at Anime & Manga **
#125 to #124 - grenadeshrapnel
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#130 to #104 - tkdftw
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**tkdftw rolled a random image posted in comment #2598467 at FJ RPG **
#141 to #104 - pwnagraphy
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**pwnagraphy rolled a random image posted in comment #5 at Cali **
#150 to #104 - inuar
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**inuar rolled a random image posted in comment #350396 at Friendly ** ok
#164 to #104 - superbla
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**superbla rolled a random image posted in comment #244 at More Badass Than You. **
#174 to #104 - lolercoasters
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
**lolercoasters rolled a random image posted in comment #178 at /thread **
#180 to #104 - youngchief
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
**youngchief rolled a random image posted in comment #186299 at Friendly **
#295 to #104 - GOTTACATCHEMALL
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
This image has expired
**GOTTACATCHEMALL rolled a random image posted in comment #244421 at Friendly **
#296 to #295 - GOTTACATCHEMALL
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#115 to #104 - weinerdick
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
**weinerdick rolled a random image posted in comment #201421 at Pokemon **
**weinerdick rolled a random image posted in comment #201421 at Pokemon **
#117 to #104 - thedarkassassin
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
**thedarkassassin rolled a random image posted in comment #2677669 at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic **
#131 to #104 - icecreamonnips
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
**icecreamonnips rolled a random image posted in comment #158 at Share your ride or Hitler. **
#142 to #104 - daerkxp
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
**daerkxp rolled a random image posted in comment #192270 at Friendly **
#135 to #104 - Striken
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
**Striken rolled a random image posted in comment #248 at Life Hacks (this ones really long) **
#137 to #135 - Striken
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
YES
#90 - seniorpokeman
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
Waterworld #3:
1. maybe the cigarettes were the reason it was valuable? Because they could use it to make more cigarettes? Or maybe the cigarette paper was too thin to be valuable, like how 24k jewelry is ******** of cash, but 10k is near nothing.
2. all of the water is saltwater, meaning that all freshwater sources on the planet have been eliminated. The only way they can get water is to:
-collect it after a storm
-recycle urine
-drink animal blood
#92 to #90 - seniorpokeman
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
****, sorry, I thought the second one said thirsty. But maybe because they don't like being in the water. They usually prefer to be on the ****. That's a good question, though.
#63 - deusexmachinase
Reply +1
(01/30/2013) [-]
In Harry, Potter Hermione returns the time turner to McGonagall. Also, You aren't allowed be seen for some weird reason...

Waddya gonna do?
#79 to #63 - anon
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
I believe the reason Rowling gives is that people who either see them self or people who see the same person twice at the same time either stand the risk of killing the future version or going insane from the encounter. It isn't well explained in the movie, but it is in the third book. Don't quote me exactly on it.
#87 to #79 - wickedtruth **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 to #87 - anon
Reply 0
(01/30/2013) [-]
at the time he got along with the ministry. He didn't start to fight with them untill the end of the fourth book.
#167 to #103 - wickedtruth **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #63 - deusexmachinase
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
... Put the comma in a wrong place.
#60 - gutimberg
Reply +2
(01/30/2013) [-]
They didn't change **** in Harry Potter