Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Big-ass guns' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (187)
[ 187 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#152 - naomemisora
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#150 - garymotherfinoak
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#140 - Kazseppi
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
My crew had a re-enlistment on the USS Wisconsin once, I couldn't go because it was on my duty day though, still want to check out a good old BB.
#139 - virtigo
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
"Here, have some liberty."
#124 - rainbowrising
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
This doesn't seem to be a very effective propulsion system
#115 - sweetellie
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Well, Why not?
Well, Why not?
#99 - DoktorHax
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
interesting fact; if you were on deck at that point, you would be a sack of mush, and no longer on that deck, seeing as you would have been sucked right of of it. dunno how far you would go, but certainly in excess of 100 meters.
#96 - Lambda
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
See that spot over there? **** it and everything near it.
#95 - jakesterify
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#91 - cheifadvisoryuri
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Ha! I call that Shark bait!
#73 - ekiouja
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
Because FREEDOM that's why. 'Murica
#49 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
Here's my philosophy about tanks:
If it can still move, you need more armor and a bigger gun.
If it can't move, you need a bigger engine, more armor and a bigger gun.
#100 to #49 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
SO YOU ALWAYS NEED A BIGGER EVERYTHING !??!?!??!

ITS A BLACK HOLE
#42 - sammyjankiis
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
#39 - anon
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
DEMOCRACY, BIATCH
#36 - fantomen
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
50,000 tons of WWII era kick-ass!
#14 - ccamp
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
to the title
#11 - Nihem
Reply 0
(01/27/2013) [-]
I ****** love the navy
#63 - shirooo
Reply -1
(01/27/2013) [-]
and everything changed when the fire nation attacked
#85 - nasesse
Reply -2
(01/27/2013) [-]
**nasesse rolled a random image posted in comment #211908 at Friendly **
no, this is why