x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #259 - cubanwhiteman (01/27/2013) [-]
That post was pretty gay, OP.

Nice job.
#200 - theflippedbird (01/27/2013) [-]
< Is not amused
#218 - cometfire (01/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#166 - EllieMuffin (01/27/2013) [-]
People just make me happy sometimes.
People just make me happy sometimes.
User avatar #50 - laspussy (01/27/2013) [-]
lots of gay posts on the front page today
#105 to #50 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
Business as usual.
#373 - HARMONYHARMONY (01/27/2013) [-]
>Funnyjunk to bronies: "UR ALL gay FAGS"
>Funnyjunk to gay people: "You're all honorable."
Wat
#325 - leebobo (01/27/2013) [-]
**leebobo rolled a random image posted in comment #454968 at Anime & Manga ** mfw im a gay african
#265 - spanishninja ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #250 - alseides (01/27/2013) [-]
that white woman
#232 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
Eww sick, cant fag's go back to hiding in the closet. man i hate gays
User avatar #237 to #232 - donekilledyou (01/27/2013) [-]
Boy you trolled us hard there!
#109 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
I hate gay people cause they are all creepy and disgusting. We should have a holocaust for gay people! :D
#116 to #109 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
I actually totally agree with that comment. I hate gay guy's weird voices and all the lesbians are just fat and ugly. The world would be a much better place if there wasn't all these gross homosexuals running around making us puke with their gayness and such... I vote for a gay Holocaust too!!!
User avatar #127 to #116 - Accidentalninja (01/27/2013) [-]
probably samefag
#142 to #109 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
Yeah, the flamboyantly open gays wearing pink cloths and painting rainbows get on my nerves. But nothing against their sexuality.
#110 to #109 - thedeadlypajamas (01/27/2013) [-]
You're trying to get red thumbs, aren'tcha?
-2
#122 to #110 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#95 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
Africa has enough aids already.

Thank god the penalty is death.

******* bubonic butt blasters.
User avatar #111 to #97 - ilovesalad (01/27/2013) [-]
Africa has enough aids already.

Thank god the penalty is death.

******* bubonic butt blasters.
+2
#125 to #111 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#36 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
The constitutionality of DOMA and Prop 8 are going to be debated in the Supreme Court this year. It's about ******* time too...goodness.
#55 to #36 - verby ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
pretty sure prop 8 was already banhammered
User avatar #226 - kookiefrankus (01/27/2013) [-]
Have nothing against gays but when did they prove that their is no choice... can someone give me sauce for that?
#254 to #226 - penetractor (01/27/2013) [-]
yea sexual orientation is genetic. and yes its probably a recessive gene and yes homosexuals can have children, they just dont like making them
yea sexual orientation is genetic. and yes its probably a recessive gene and yes homosexuals can have children, they just dont like making them
#229 to #226 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
I heard there have been brain scans of both heterosexual and homosexual people and there were some differences in the areas related.
User avatar #231 to #229 - kookiefrankus (01/27/2013) [-]
Well that makes sense then.
User avatar #234 to #231 - processfailed ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
All people start out as females in the womb, including female sexual preferences ( i.e. liking men). Then, hormones kick in to instruct the fetus to become male. This however does not affect the brain, for that we have androgen receptors and androgen hormones. The receptors and hormones need to activate within a set time or else the brain remains unaltered. Sometimes, either the receptors do not activate or the hormones are not generated therefore making the brain unaltered (liking men). Occasionally the brain will absorb only a limited number of hormones (making people bisexual). If the receptors activate at the right time and androgen hormones are released at the right time, we end up as straight guys... This is a simplified version but basically what happens to make people gay.... hope it helps. Essentially, im saying it definitely isn't a choice.
User avatar #241 to #234 - kookiefrankus (01/27/2013) [-]
And I have my answer from a genius. Thank you.
User avatar #246 to #241 - processfailed ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
You are very welcome... and I only have an IQ of 120.. MENSA dictates genius is at 130. But thanks anyways
User avatar #248 to #234 - psychoticdesires (01/27/2013) [-]
If this is what makes males like males, what affects females to only like females?
User avatar #252 to #248 - processfailed ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
Its the same but in reverse, the hormones that turn the body male never activate but the androgen hormones still activate. Of course, there are various levels of it but that is basically what happens.
#236 to #234 - Rascal (01/27/2013) [-]
So they are pretty much Geneticly ****** up in the head and that is why they like men on men and women on women. So now i can call them Genetic freaks of nature.
User avatar #245 to #236 - kookiefrankus (01/27/2013) [-]
Your mother stopped putting out recently, didn't she? Don't take your sexual frustration out on others.
#240 to #236 - thiseffinguy (01/27/2013) [-]
STOP FLAAAAAAAAAAAAMING
STOP FLAAAAAAAAAAAAMING
User avatar #239 to #236 - processfailed ONLINE (01/27/2013) [-]
Well, technically you ************ are the "default" if anything, we straight people are the freaks.... but youre anon so i will just accept that you are a pussy bitch that is scared. I accept your apology.
User avatar #273 to #239 - Stan Marsh (01/27/2013) [-]
Females liking females is caused by some magical wizard somewhere in the universe who wants us to be happy
0
#238 to #236 - processfailed has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #274 to #226 - setittowumbo (01/27/2013) [-]
What I believe is that it develops over time. Your sexuality is like your growth. As you get older things change. For some it takes a bit longer to know what your sexuality is causing them to be sexually confused. It was this way for me when I was younger. This is just a theory though.
User avatar #4 - anonymousattorney (01/26/2013) [-]
Uh...marriage isn't a right. It's an agreement of consent between two people. Anyone who says otherwise is ************ you.
#6 to #4 - Rascal (01/26/2013) [-]
what does marriage and homosexuality have to do with each other in this content, he was sentenced to death because he was gay, not because he wanted to marry a guy (probably did but not the reason) or at least not what the content tells us,
User avatar #8 to #4 - KayRed (01/26/2013) [-]
Anon is right, they are fighting for the right to live. So stop trying to start **** .
User avatar #15 to #4 - rhetoricalfunny (01/26/2013) [-]
Human Right #16
The right to marriage and family (By choice & consent)
User avatar #379 to #15 - anonymousattorney (01/27/2013) [-]
Wait....now, from my understanding, rights should be reserved exclusively to the individual. Something like marriage isn't a right; it's, as I said before, an agreement between two individuals. Now, as I said before, that anyone who said otherwise is ************ you....well, it appears that whichever group decided to make these list of human rights (The United Nations, if I'm not mistaken) is, well....lying to your face, under the assumption of...Well, I'm not entirely sure, as I haven't actually looked up these so-called "Human Rights". I'm assuming, of course, that they're some list of rights that a group of nations have agreed to uphold, whether or not they actually are legitimate rights (an right, as I mentioned before, was something that only and individual could possess. Groups of people should never have group-specific rights that only apply to them.) Now, don't get me wrong; I'm not saying that the idea that two people should be able to love whomever they choose is wrong. Love is something that no person, no law, can define or constrict. However, I'm only saying that marriage doesn't count as a right, and should never count as one, mainly because of the fact that rights can be revoked by government.
User avatar #391 to #379 - rhetoricalfunny (01/28/2013) [-]
Most countries don't give a **** about human rights, but they're pretty much the rights that is agreed everyone deserves.

With that being said the right to marriage implies that if to people do in fact want to marry each other, with said benefits and the rights that come with being married (varies by country etc.) They should be allowed to. Regardless of anything else. Including gender.

This also means that one has the right not to marry if it is an arranged marriage, and they cannot be disallowed to marry.

Now weather or not a right can be revoked is rather insignificant because theoretically a right is a right and cannot be revoked. (of course this isn't how it works out.)

Now when it comes to marriage being a right. I have the right to marry, and receive all the benefits of such within my are (country, state, city etc.) If the concept of marriage happens to not exist where I live then I am still allowed to.

Basically whatever the **** constitutes as marriage where you live, you're allowed it, by choice, to whoever the **** you want.
User avatar #20 to #4 - coolcalx (01/26/2013) [-]
in the US and most other countries, marriage comes with many legal and financial rights and benefits.

the Government Accountability Office in the US recognizes 1,138 rights and benefits of marriage.


let me know if I'm completely misunderstanding what you said
User avatar #377 to #20 - anonymousattorney (01/27/2013) [-]
So, wait; why is the government involved in an agreement between two individuals in the first place, let alone an agreement that said two individuals will love and care for one another until death? And on the topic of rights; why would someone ever think that giving a particular group of people unique rights was a good idea? Because, from my understanding, rights are exclusively reserved for individuals only. So, please, correct me if I'm wrong here, but, from my understanding of what you've just told me, people who are married have more rights than those who are single.
User avatar #378 to #377 - coolcalx (01/27/2013) [-]
because a marriage is a legal contract.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_and_responsibilities_of_marriages_in_the_United_States

a lot of them are family rights, as in, rights you both share together

and no, corporations have specific rights, because they're treated as a single entity, just like a married couple is considered a single entitiy
 Friends (0)