Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#487 - lordnerevar ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/23/2013) [-]
When Marriage really IS one man and one woman forever, then I will take these arguments seriously. Outlaw divorce and abide by your own arguments and we'll talk. Who the **** really cares if two men or women marry each other? It's none of our damn business. OP is using Godmode hax, because this is right.
When Marriage really IS one man and one woman forever, then I will take these arguments seriously. Outlaw divorce and abide by your own arguments and we'll talk. Who the **** really cares if two men or women marry each other? It's none of our damn business. OP is using Godmode hax, because this is right.
#417 - greenpyro
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I'm so glad racial mixing is accepted normally. I mean I know integration is still a problem in many places including the western world, but now I can completely see gay marriage being a normal thing a few decades from now. People don't like change or something challenging their beliefs, but marriage is now becoming more of a religious/moral issue that I feel that will end up being available for everyone regardless of sexual orientation.
pic unrelated :P
#501 to #417 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I truly respect you for stating your beliefs so proudly.
though i don't believe in interracial (more as a preference reason) you are spot on. if only more people were so rationally worded instead of "OMG INSENSITIVE MORON, YOUSHOULN'TBEALIVE!!!!!*&$#(STUPID REDNECK COUSIN ******"
I personally think that marriage is kind of redundant.
#505 to #501 - greenpyro
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Well I'm a straight latin guy so I'm all for interracial (as an immigrant I'm the first in my family to date a girl outside of my ethnicity, and of course my race). Marriage started out as a religious practice, thats has lasted thousands of yours, but in our age things are drastically changing, so I do seem as equal marriage as possible. Btw I'm probably older than 65% of FJ users which is why I'm a bit more mature than just sayin OMG blah blah. haha. Btw how come you commented on this? This content past a while ago
#507 to #505 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
interesting to find someone who can actually read what they are typing.
#388 - disiprine
Reply -12
(01/21/2013) [-]
The reality of this situation is that the gays aren`t marrying for `love` they are marrying for financial benefits such as lower expenses per person and cross-employer health plans, not that they don`t deserve this, but marriage is not a right to have for everyone, it is a privilege, a privilege subjugated by christian and catholic law which BLATANTLY STATES that marriage is between man and woman only. If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it.
#445 to #388 - rotinaj
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#458 to #445 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
>atheist religions
son what the actual ****.
#391 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage existed before the bible. Its not purely christian so they dont own the rights to it. Plus religious law and governmental law SHOULD NOT apply to each other. Religion has no place in politics.
#394 to #391 - disiprine
Reply -4
(01/21/2013) [-]
Implying marriage is politics, implying marriage before religion.
#406 to #394 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
There were religions and marriages before Christianity dumbass. I'm talking about its up to the government to pass same sex laws i.e. POLITICS so religion has no right to say it shouldnt be passed. If marriage is only Christian how the **** did the ancient Egyptians and non-Christian countries marry for many years before the bible?
#413 to #406 - disiprine
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Ancient Egypt and non-christian countries married under theeir own religion, obviously. Marriage is all under religious affairs, I thought I made that clear.
#410 to #406 - disiprine
Reply -2
(01/21/2013) [-]
Holy **** it`s like talking to Bill O`Reilly faggot version, first of all, get an account, second of all, please read, third, I never said there weren`t religions before christianity, fourth I said if there was a religion where gays can marry they should, please read before rebutting to refrain from looking like an ass.
#416 to #410 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
1) Dont rage because Im anon just because you cant form a legit argument
2) Im not gay Im just not an arrogant **** like you. I'm throwing legit arguments at you and you have no reputable come backs.
3) You said " implying marriage before religion" saying that marriages cant have existed before it. Which it did. So.. yeah you are a hypocrite and clearly dont read before you post.
Why should there be a religion where they should marry? Why not atheism WHICH I DID MENTION! There are Christians who accept gay marriage, atheists which accept it, muslims, jews etc. Just because YOU dont doesnt mean others dont.
Religion has no place in this. So dont ******* mention it. Its up to the government NOT religion. So it has no legit place in this argument.
Me read? Yeh... I just proved what an idiot you are. I had to repeat all my points here because you clearly are too stupid to have seen them.
#430 to #416 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Also I don't see you providing back-up for saying that marriage existed before religion, which it didn't, atheists can't be reverends who marry, and religon has everything to do with marriage, you saying it being under the state/government implies that there were forms of government before religious beliefs, I see history isn't your major.
#444 to #430 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
You dont need a reverend to marry. You sign a sheet idiot in an office.
"forms of government" can include tribes of cavemen where we didnt have idols we just hunted like animals. So yes, there were.
Just look it up. If you cant grasp my point that religion doesnt have place in deciding same sex laws your just a ******* idiot. One simple point just cant be grasped by that ignorant singular brain cell.
#450 to #444 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Ignorant of the fact of....?
#423 to #416 - disiprine
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
"If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it." I'm pretty sure I said that.
#449 to #423 - Keleth
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
problem with that is, ITS ******* ILLEGAL!!!! thats the entire ******* problem!!!! MAKE IT LEGAL and then the churches that agree with it can do the ceremony!!
#435 to #423 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
"Religion has n0 place in this argument" AND religion doesnt decide whether same sex marriage is passed.
Pretty sure I said that about 4 times now. Religion has no place in deciding who marries who. THUS... this might be TOO hard for you to grasp... your entire argument is void. Every religion has people who accepts it anyway.
#443 to #435 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
My argument is that gays shouldn't marry under religions that disallow it, how is it void? it makes perfect sense.
#448 to #443 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
You said gay marriage is wrong because marriage is under Christian law. Which it ISNT.
My point is you're bringing religion into government. THEY decide the bill not some catholic loons so stop bringing them into it. They have no place. End of. NO religion in politics. Dont back up gay marriage as bad because of some pathetic Christian laws. They shouldnt mix.
#456 to #448 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry I meant to say most marriages in america, I suppose that was the hole, too late to patch it up now. I never said gay marriage it bad, not did i state I was against it, I was being sensible toward the people against it and why, being an anti-theist I really don't see myself in another situation backing up the relgious people.
#396 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Yes and in American law constitution reigns supreme over any other word
#398 to #396 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
When did I say that? I'm in canada ********.
#408 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
>implying straight people arent doing that.

I think you'll find there are gays marrying for love just as much as there are straights abusing the system.
#414 to #408 - disiprine
Reply -2
(01/21/2013) [-]
Read the whole paragraph please.
#422 to #414 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I did. Your religion comment is ********. You dont need religion to get married retard.
#446 to #388 - Keleth
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
if marriage was only recognized by the religious bodies, then i would agree its a little silly...but no...government sees marriage and they see civil partnerships as less. much less rights
#431 to #388 - ivoryhammer
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#433 to #388 - lazaman
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
OH COOL GUYS LOOK!
SOME ONE WHO "KNOWS" EVERYTHING SOME ONE IS FEELING WHEN DOING SOMETHING!

Because us gays are TOTALLY incapable of love, and we TOTALLY would never want to marry each other.

Mhm, thank you for enlightening me on MY feelings, thanks buddy!
#503 to #433 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
please don't attack me, this is an honest question. (I'm pro gay rights)
Why do you want to be_ married_? I understand that two people have the right to be together as a couple and be recognized as such, but why choose to go through an expensive ceremony, and vows that are trivial to think make a couple more couple-y when all that matters is that you love each other? not to side with #388, but you have to understand where hes coming from (albeit a very poorly put together point with loads of assumption) it kinda looks like the reaping of financial benefits. i guess what im saying is that, and this also applies to straight couples as well, why isn't the pure joy of love with another enough to be content instead of labeling oneself through an antiquated and, frankly redundant, ritual?
please no rage, it's only a question and i will gladly accept your answer, angry or not.
#473 to #433 - frohling
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
hey lazaman we support your rights and everything, and I am not hating on you. but seriously bro don't be a fag :P
#478 to #473 - lazaman
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
hwat?
#437 to #433 - disiprine
Reply -3
(01/21/2013) [-]
Perhaps I was a bit general with my words, *most gays *most marriages are under catholic law
#447 to #388 - PurpleStuff ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#474 to #388 - instalation
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Please just shut up. You're giving the rest of us religious a bad name. ;~;

we're not all close minded assholes..
#232 - iownmicee
Reply -4
(01/21/2013) [-]
Actually the protests against 'race mixing' have a valid point. In a perfect world yes, people of all races could happily live near eachother and there would be no such thing as racism. However, we do not live in such world. How do we create a society that is as close to perfect as it gets? We separate races. That way, no ********, no racism. 'Humans are all equal, regardless of skin colour'; true, every human has the same rights, however, cultural beliefs, norms and religion still separate us. There's going to be conflicts. Solution: separate societies according to race and/or religion, no society wealthier than the other.

I realise it is theoratically flawless, though impossible in practice. Just like communism.

Commence the red thumbs
#239 to #232 - spearpwi
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
The village I work and live in completely proves that point annoyingly. The only anomaly is the children who do not give a **** about any of that. We got Indians, Afghans, Fijians, even Scotts! These kids just do not give a ****.
#315 to #232 - drfreeman
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
or we wait a little and breed together until there are no "Races" and just one people. Were all humans, and in this time we can go anywhere. There are white people from Africa, and Black people from Canada. Color doesn't mean much, we are all human.
#256 to #232 - thebritishguy
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
but then families would be separated because of religion and race and that would be horrible, what if some one in your family turned Muslim and then had to be seperated so you would never see them again, or if your Dad was black then you wouldn't agree with it
#273 to #256 - iownmicee
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
As I said, impossible in practice.
#350 to #273 - thebritishguy
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
but it would not be the perfect world as people would get depressed and be torn apart. It may be a perfect world for you but you have to look at both perspectives, if this law was in place I would be separated from my family as I am an atheist
#207 - Plagus
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#173 - HordeyWordey
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#147 - reican
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
I bet if i came with a poster stating " wearing sunglasses is to cheer for communism" the old timers would suddenly throw them of in panic not to act like a communist
#401 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
lol "race mixing is communism" XD .....Oh wait. Communism=equality of everyone... Race mixing IS communism. D;
#377 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Don't they already look stupid?
#354 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I don't think the old-time protesters look stupid.
I actually agree with them.

I find the mixing of bloodlines to be a bit sad. In another 200 years or so, we'll all be mixed together and their won't be any "Pure" blood left in any of us.
Not saying anyone is better then another, but that its just sad that we'll lose alot of our genetic originality.


And yes, I signed out because I know the flames you all will drop on me will make the sun look a pussy.
#424 to #354 - arstya
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry to burst your bubble anon, but we survive because of the mixing. Diversity keeps every species and ecosystem alive. No diversity, no new genes. It's like sticking with a 80's computer in today's age.
#463 to #354 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#352 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Race mixing is COMMUNISM

I can literally hear the patriotic flag waving MUH FREEDUMS
#330 - admiralamory **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#286 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
pretty damn smart.
#281 - againsthomos
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
LOLOLOLOLOOLOLOL
#227 - kornadth
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
**kornadth rolled a random image posted in comment #29 at HNNNNG ** my opinion
#214 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I HATE gayS LIKE OP,not because faggotry is an illnes and unnatural like it is,but because they always try to make everyone like them and always think that they are better than everyone else
#217 to #214 - volto **User deleted account**
-4
has deleted their comment [-]
#153 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
OP is a faggot. This isn't funny. cunt.
#108 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
im not supporting anything i just think everone should be able to do whatever the **** they want
#117 to #108 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#230 to #117 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
memearrow whats wrong with murder
#234 to #230 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#243 to #234 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
yes
#73 - farn
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
i have more problems with a black man marrying a white woman them 2 gay dudes
#17 - ghettoswag
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Chances are the people in the first photo are the same people in the second