Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#417 - greenpyro
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I'm so glad racial mixing is accepted normally. I mean I know integration is still a problem in many places including the western world, but now I can completely see gay marriage being a normal thing a few decades from now. People don't like change or something challenging their beliefs, but marriage is now becoming more of a religious/moral issue that I feel that will end up being available for everyone regardless of sexual orientation.
pic unrelated :P
#501 to #417 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
I truly respect you for stating your beliefs so proudly.
though i don't believe in interracial (more as a preference reason) you are spot on. if only more people were so rationally worded instead of "OMG INSENSITIVE MORON, YOUSHOULN'TBEALIVE!!!!!*&$#(STUPID REDNECK COUSIN ******"
I personally think that marriage is kind of redundant.
#505 to #501 - greenpyro
Reply +1
(01/31/2013) [-]
Well I'm a straight latin guy so I'm all for interracial (as an immigrant I'm the first in my family to date a girl outside of my ethnicity, and of course my race). Marriage started out as a religious practice, thats has lasted thousands of yours, but in our age things are drastically changing, so I do seem as equal marriage as possible. Btw I'm probably older than 65% of FJ users which is why I'm a bit more mature than just sayin OMG blah blah. haha. Btw how come you commented on this? This content past a while ago
#507 to #505 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply +1
(02/02/2013) [-]
interesting to find someone who can actually read what they are typing.
#388 - disiprine
Reply -12
(01/21/2013) [-]
The reality of this situation is that the gays aren`t marrying for `love` they are marrying for financial benefits such as lower expenses per person and cross-employer health plans, not that they don`t deserve this, but marriage is not a right to have for everyone, it is a privilege, a privilege subjugated by christian and catholic law which BLATANTLY STATES that marriage is between man and woman only. If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it.
#445 to #388 - rotinaj
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#458 to #445 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
>atheist religions
son what the actual ****.
#391 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage existed before the bible. Its not purely christian so they dont own the rights to it. Plus religious law and governmental law SHOULD NOT apply to each other. Religion has no place in politics.
#394 to #391 - disiprine
Reply -4
(01/21/2013) [-]
Implying marriage is politics, implying marriage before religion.
#406 to #394 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
There were religions and marriages before Christianity dumbass. I'm talking about its up to the government to pass same sex laws i.e. POLITICS so religion has no right to say it shouldnt be passed. If marriage is only Christian how the **** did the ancient Egyptians and non-Christian countries marry for many years before the bible?
#413 to #406 - disiprine
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Ancient Egypt and non-christian countries married under theeir own religion, obviously. Marriage is all under religious affairs, I thought I made that clear.
#410 to #406 - disiprine
Reply -2
(01/21/2013) [-]
Holy **** it`s like talking to Bill O`Reilly faggot version, first of all, get an account, second of all, please read, third, I never said there weren`t religions before christianity, fourth I said if there was a religion where gays can marry they should, please read before rebutting to refrain from looking like an ass.
#416 to #410 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
1) Dont rage because Im anon just because you cant form a legit argument
2) Im not gay Im just not an arrogant **** like you. I'm throwing legit arguments at you and you have no reputable come backs.
3) You said " implying marriage before religion" saying that marriages cant have existed before it. Which it did. So.. yeah you are a hypocrite and clearly dont read before you post.
Why should there be a religion where they should marry? Why not atheism WHICH I DID MENTION! There are Christians who accept gay marriage, atheists which accept it, muslims, jews etc. Just because YOU dont doesnt mean others dont.
Religion has no place in this. So dont ******* mention it. Its up to the government NOT religion. So it has no legit place in this argument.
Me read? Yeh... I just proved what an idiot you are. I had to repeat all my points here because you clearly are too stupid to have seen them.
#430 to #416 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Also I don't see you providing back-up for saying that marriage existed before religion, which it didn't, atheists can't be reverends who marry, and religon has everything to do with marriage, you saying it being under the state/government implies that there were forms of government before religious beliefs, I see history isn't your major.
#444 to #430 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
You dont need a reverend to marry. You sign a sheet idiot in an office.
"forms of government" can include tribes of cavemen where we didnt have idols we just hunted like animals. So yes, there were.
Just look it up. If you cant grasp my point that religion doesnt have place in deciding same sex laws your just a ******* idiot. One simple point just cant be grasped by that ignorant singular brain cell.
#450 to #444 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Ignorant of the fact of....?
#423 to #416 - disiprine
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
"If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it." I'm pretty sure I said that.
#449 to #423 - Keleth
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
problem with that is, ITS ******* ILLEGAL!!!! thats the entire ******* problem!!!! MAKE IT LEGAL and then the churches that agree with it can do the ceremony!!
#435 to #423 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
"Religion has n0 place in this argument" AND religion doesnt decide whether same sex marriage is passed.
Pretty sure I said that about 4 times now. Religion has no place in deciding who marries who. THUS... this might be TOO hard for you to grasp... your entire argument is void. Every religion has people who accepts it anyway.
#443 to #435 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
My argument is that gays shouldn't marry under religions that disallow it, how is it void? it makes perfect sense.
#448 to #443 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
You said gay marriage is wrong because marriage is under Christian law. Which it ISNT.
My point is you're bringing religion into government. THEY decide the bill not some catholic loons so stop bringing them into it. They have no place. End of. NO religion in politics. Dont back up gay marriage as bad because of some pathetic Christian laws. They shouldnt mix.
#456 to #448 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry I meant to say most marriages in america, I suppose that was the hole, too late to patch it up now. I never said gay marriage it bad, not did i state I was against it, I was being sensible toward the people against it and why, being an anti-theist I really don't see myself in another situation backing up the relgious people.
#396 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Yes and in American law constitution reigns supreme over any other word
#398 to #396 - disiprine
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
When did I say that? I'm in canada ********.
#408 to #388 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
>implying straight people arent doing that.

I think you'll find there are gays marrying for love just as much as there are straights abusing the system.
#414 to #408 - disiprine
Reply -2
(01/21/2013) [-]
Read the whole paragraph please.
#422 to #414 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I did. Your religion comment is ********. You dont need religion to get married retard.
#446 to #388 - Keleth
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
if marriage was only recognized by the religious bodies, then i would agree its a little silly...but no...government sees marriage and they see civil partnerships as less. much less rights
#431 to #388 - ivoryhammer
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#433 to #388 - lazaman
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
OH COOL GUYS LOOK!
SOME ONE WHO "KNOWS" EVERYTHING SOME ONE IS FEELING WHEN DOING SOMETHING!

Because us gays are TOTALLY incapable of love, and we TOTALLY would never want to marry each other.

Mhm, thank you for enlightening me on MY feelings, thanks buddy!
#503 to #433 - shfreaksixninesix
Reply 0
(01/31/2013) [-]
please don't attack me, this is an honest question. (I'm pro gay rights)
Why do you want to be_ married_? I understand that two people have the right to be together as a couple and be recognized as such, but why choose to go through an expensive ceremony, and vows that are trivial to think make a couple more couple-y when all that matters is that you love each other? not to side with #388, but you have to understand where hes coming from (albeit a very poorly put together point with loads of assumption) it kinda looks like the reaping of financial benefits. i guess what im saying is that, and this also applies to straight couples as well, why isn't the pure joy of love with another enough to be content instead of labeling oneself through an antiquated and, frankly redundant, ritual?
please no rage, it's only a question and i will gladly accept your answer, angry or not.
#473 to #433 - frohling
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
hey lazaman we support your rights and everything, and I am not hating on you. but seriously bro don't be a fag :P
#478 to #473 - lazaman
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
hwat?
#437 to #433 - disiprine
Reply -3
(01/21/2013) [-]
Perhaps I was a bit general with my words, *most gays *most marriages are under catholic law
#447 to #388 - PurpleStuff ONLINE
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#474 to #388 - instalation
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Please just shut up. You're giving the rest of us religious a bad name. ;~;

we're not all close minded assholes..
#207 - Plagus
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#173 - HordeyWordey
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
#163 - biggrand
Reply -4
(01/21/2013) [-]
Something i'm starting to ask myself, does anyone really need to be married? I mean if you'r gay or lesbian and want to be my guest, but do you need a ring to love each other? do you need to make a physical statement of your own love life to feel secure about it?
#166 to #163 - winsanity
Reply -3
(01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage is just a celebration of love, thats like asking the question of whats the point in christmas, birthdays etc. we still celebrate the occasion mainly because of tradition but also for the meaning behind the celebration as well.
#164 to #163 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
If they get sick, you can't help them.
Marriage bonds more than just love.
#72 - dwarfman
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
lol cowboy hats and old white people.
#203 to #72 - garymotherfinoak
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
MFW even the comments have ads now
#66 - caplocker
Reply +1
(01/21/2013) [-]
I'd like to point something out. I'm a republican who support gay marriage. Anything else is unconstitutional. Not all conservatives think it should be illegal. A large number of my conservative friends agree. red thumb me, I'm ok with it. But now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
#440 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
The whole reason people/sheeple wanted to stop race mixing is because it's the genetically dominant species who overwrite everything else. In otherwords, it's why Black people ARE black. They have 'genetically' dominant traits across the board. Meaning over time, everyone in America WILL be black, and that also means the loss of European neurology too. In the end genetically dominant traits always win out. Even the Australian Aboriginees wanted race seperation, because white people are MORE genetically dominant than them, hence the loss of their people and culture.... Genetic Genocide,,, look at what America IS becoming... Were those people really wrong???
#401 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
lol "race mixing is communism" XD .....Oh wait. Communism=equality of everyone... Race mixing IS communism. D;
#377 - miaandvinny
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Don't they already look stupid?
#325 - itrinx
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
The future will see our history as a crime.
#309 - annoyingsmartguy
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
This is about 60 years ago, not forty.
#286 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
pretty damn smart.
#281 - againsthomos
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
LOLOLOLOLOOLOLOL
#253 - finni
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
"Race mixing is communism"

I don't think that person know what communism is... reminds me of funnyjunk. Doesn't know what 9gag.com is, but they suspect it must be evil and be doing everything wrong so they go on saying everything bad they can think of is from 9gag, even though they have no idea what it is.

Of course, that doesn't go for everyone, perhaps not even a majority, but a lot of people
#257 to #253 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Communism is the belief that everyone is equal no matter the colour etc. (not including the ****** up version we have today, but the true deifnition of communism). So race mixing to have everybody equal CAN be seen as communism.
#275 to #257 - hellproof
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Communism is a form of economic government not social, so in turn it has nothing to do with race or sex.
#336 to #275 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Communism aims to make "social order" so how is it NOT social?
#373 to #336 - hellproof
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
that is socialism not communism
#264 to #257 - finni
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
It can also be the freedom thinking right-wing libiterian way. Everyone is born free and should be able to find love no matter what and shouldn't be regulated or decided by the Government.
#155 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
Well, race mixing is wrong you ******* cunt, by mixing race, you are destroying 2 races, so technically, it's genocide. Idiot
#159 to #155 - vanoreo
Reply -9
(01/21/2013) [-]
Technically you're right...

And wrong...

At the same time....
#153 - anon
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
OP is a faggot. This isn't funny. cunt.
#108 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
im not supporting anything i just think everone should be able to do whatever the **** they want
#117 to #108 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#230 to #117 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
memearrow whats wrong with murder
#234 to #230 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#243 to #234 - clapex
Reply -1
(01/21/2013) [-]
yes
#12 - snerus
Reply 0
(01/21/2013) [-]
I don't think he looks THAT stupid.
#1 - anon
Reply 0
(01/20/2013) [-]
Idk, I still think we should have segregation