Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
User avatar #187 - thebigpenguin (01/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
HAHA good one OP I really laughed at your content!

- Nobody
User avatar #244 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
"gay people should be treated the same and have the same rights we have including the right to marry, unless it's o.p he's a ****** " - funnyjunk
User avatar #218 - greatboobya (01/21/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I want a harem >: (
#237 to #218 - sweetellie (01/21/2013) [-]
Are you Ataru Moroboshi..?
#182 - redjohn (01/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I thought this was FunnyJunk.
I thought this was FunnyJunk.
User avatar #184 to #182 - redjohn (01/21/2013) [-]
FUNNYjunk.
+3
#103 - absolutefish **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#82 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [+] (14 replies)
Stupid ignorant american homosexual ****** . Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother. The issue is the right of children to have a mother and a father who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by people who do not want to get married to someone of the complementary sex but rather who want access to children.
One Mama, One Papa, True Parents
You should learn this from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
2. “In France, marriage is not designed to protect the love between two people. Marriage is specifically designed to provide children with families. The most serious study done so far demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gay parents.” said Xavier Bongibault, an atheist homosexual.
3. "I was raised by two women, suffered from the lack of a father, a daily presence, a character and a properly masculine example, some counterweight to the relationship of my mother to her lover. I was aware of it at a very early age. I lived that absence of a father, experienced it, as an amputation. As soon as I learned that the government was going to officialize marriage between two people of the same sex, I was thrown into disarray. It would be institutionalizing a situation that had scarred me considerably. In that there is an injustice that I can in no way allow. I would've jumped into the fray and would have brought a complaint before the French state and before the European Court of Human Rights, for the violation of my right to a mom and a dad."
Jean-Dominique Bunel, a specialist in humanitarian law.
+3
#157 to #82 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #18 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [+] (7 replies)
The thing is if 80% of Americans voted against gay marriage it would be more important for democracys sake that it be illegal rather than the moral justification of it being legalised.

User avatar #19 to #18 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
That's why normal states are "state of laws", in which laws prevent "the tyranny of the majority".
Picture this: if over 50% of the US population voted that a certain individual be condemned to death, do you think that gives them any authority over the existing laws?
+2
#436 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (3 replies)
-6
#233 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (27 replies)
User avatar #252 to #233 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
how is it different?
#109 - nephritho (01/21/2013) [+] (9 replies)
This image has expired
Every generation we have to deal with these kind of " ******** " ********* .
A long time ago a muslim friend of mine that I met through Runescape, said she was scared of homosexuals because she thought gay people would harm her or rape her.
mfw the stupidity.
+2
#116 to #112 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69 - darknesincontrol (01/21/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I think most of them will be dead in 40 years
User avatar #74 to #71 - farn (01/21/2013) [-]
those are the same people probably
User avatar #57 - drainbramage (01/21/2013) [+] (5 replies)
I don't understand why people are so against gay marriage, it's not like they're hiding the pickle in your bedroom while looking you in the eye. If it's from a religious point of view, then can someone please explain why they concentrate on the gay bashing part but "love thy neighbor" went out of the ******* window?
User avatar #4 - ilolzville (01/20/2013) [+] (3 replies)
No, in 40 years they're all going to wonder WHY THE **** they wanted to get married in the first place. Because marriage destroys relationships.
User avatar #15 to #4 - sketchysketchist (01/21/2013) [-]
Yeah!
Did you know 100% of all divorces start with marriage.
#179 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I... is that one saying... umm... "race mixing is communism"?

It can't be, can it?
User avatar #204 to #179 - warzon (01/21/2013) [-]
**warzon slowly begins to place a rag over the anons mouth quietly dragging anon off**
#167 - thechurchchurch (01/21/2013) [+] (5 replies)
>"As long as its between two consenting adults,they should be allowed to get married,you ******* hillbilly!"
>"Blood relatives getting married? **** no,you ******* hillbilly!"

Seriously though,I dont really have a problem with gay marriage,but dont act like youre so different from those people protesting.I don't see any of you tolerant progressives advocating for a pair of siblings wanting shack up.
#189 to #167 - zanea (01/21/2013) [-]
In the case of gay couples, they can't have children conventionally, but with inbreeding, the child could come out deformed or have a ton of other problems thus causing them to have a lesser quality of life. I have no problem with homosexuality, but inbreeding is pretty damn bad in most situations within our society.
User avatar #163 - biggrand (01/21/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Something i'm starting to ask myself, does anyone really need to be married? I mean if you'r gay or ******* and want to be my guest, but do you need a ring to love each other? do you need to make a physical statement of your own love life to feel secure about it?
#164 to #163 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [-]
If they get sick, you can't help them.
Marriage bonds more than just love.
#153 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [-]
OP is a ****** . This isn't funny. **** .
User avatar #147 - reican (01/21/2013) [-]
I bet if i came with a poster stating " wearing sunglasses is to cheer for communism" the old timers would suddenly throw them of in panic not to act like a communist
#72 - dwarfman (01/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
lol cowboy hats and old white people.
#66 - caplocker (01/21/2013) [-]
I'd like to point something out. I'm a republican who support gay marriage. Anything else is unconstitutional. Not all conservatives think it should be illegal. A large number of my conservative friends agree. red thumb me, I'm ok with it. But now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
 Friends (0)