x
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+3
#103 - absolutefish **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+2
#436 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #500 to #436 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
A thumb for you, Sir!
0
#506 to #500 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #508 to #506 - shfreaksixninesix (02/02/2013) [-]
i still see it.
i still see them all.
User avatar #57 - drainbramage (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't understand why people are so against gay marriage, it's not like they're hiding the pickle in your bedroom while looking you in the eye. If it's from a religious point of view, then can someone please explain why they concentrate on the gay bashing part but "love thy neighbor" went out of the ******* window?
#130 to #57 - arkfire (01/21/2013) [-]
Well marriage is a ceremony between a man and a woman under God where they pledge themselves to each other and God til death and they join him in heaven and the Bible clearly states this and is between a man and woman only.
#375 to #130 - miaandvinny (01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage didn't start in the bible...
0
#132 to #130 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#144 to #57 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
When did loving your neighbor and not wanting gay marriage to be legal become the same thing? They are two different things. I am supposed to tolerate your lifestyle
if it goes against my moral foundation. That is what loving your neighbor means. You do not judge them or criticize them. Now gay marriage is like saying to us,"Support the gay people, its their right." So you are telling us to accept something we believe is unacceptable behavior. You seriously don't see why this is a problem?
+1
#68 to #57 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #147 - reican (01/21/2013) [-]
I bet if i came with a poster stating " wearing sunglasses is to cheer for communism" the old timers would suddenly throw them of in panic not to act like a communist
#72 - dwarfman (01/21/2013) [-]
lol cowboy hats and old white people.
#203 to #72 - garymotherfinoak (01/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
MFW even the comments have ads now
#66 - caplocker (01/21/2013) [-]
I'd like to point something out. I'm a republican who support gay marriage. Anything else is unconstitutional. Not all conservatives think it should be illegal. A large number of my conservative friends agree. red thumb me, I'm ok with it. But now you know, and knowing is half the battle.
#182 - redjohn (01/21/2013) [-]
I thought this was FunnyJunk.
I thought this was FunnyJunk.
User avatar #184 to #182 - redjohn (01/21/2013) [-]
FUNNYjunk.
#179 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
I... is that one saying... umm... "race mixing is communism"?

It can't be, can it?
User avatar #204 to #179 - warzon (01/21/2013) [-]
**warzon slowly begins to place a rag over the anons mouth quietly dragging anon off**
#93 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
inb4 next theyll want marriage between man and video game characters
User avatar #110 to #93 - Greevon (01/21/2013) [-]
inb4 "i do"
User avatar #177 to #93 - WhattheNorris (01/21/2013) [-]
inb4 Archer
User avatar #162 to #93 - biggrand (01/21/2013) [-]
some dude in japan did this. . .
#82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
Stupid ignorant american homosexual faggot. Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother. The issue is the right of children to have a mother and a father who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by people who do not want to get married to someone of the complementary sex but rather who want access to children.
One Mama, One Papa, True Parents
You should learn this from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
2. “In France, marriage is not designed to protect the love between two people. Marriage is specifically designed to provide children with families. The most serious study done so far demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gay parents.” said Xavier Bongibault, an atheist homosexual.
3. "I was raised by two women, suffered from the lack of a father, a daily presence, a character and a properly masculine example, some counterweight to the relationship of my mother to her lover. I was aware of it at a very early age. I lived that absence of a father, experienced it, as an amputation. As soon as I learned that the government was going to officialize marriage between two people of the same sex, I was thrown into disarray. It would be institutionalizing a situation that had scarred me considerably. In that there is an injustice that I can in no way allow. I would've jumped into the fray and would have brought a complaint before the French state and before the European Court of Human Rights, for the violation of my right to a mom and a dad."
Jean-Dominique Bunel, a specialist in humanitarian law.
#156 to #82 - coloredfolks (01/21/2013) [-]
somebody actually argue logically with this guy.  oh wait, that wouldnt make sense.     
   
because he is right
somebody actually argue logically with this guy. oh wait, that wouldnt make sense.

because he is right
#205 to #156 - willindor (01/21/2013) [-]
This is not the right place for discussions like that.
-1
#201 to #82 - willindor has deleted their comment [-]
#86 to #82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
Is something jammed up your anus?
User avatar #134 to #86 - douevensax (01/21/2013) [-]
The thing about you anons, you can only enjoy the party for a few minutes then be kicked out for an hour.
#87 to #82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
'study done so far demonstrates quite clearly that a child has trouble being raised by gay parents.” said Xavier Bongibault, an atheist homosexual'

What study
#91 to #82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
YAY ANON PARTY!!!
#95 to #82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
IT BURNS!!!

AHH

THE ******** BURNS!
User avatar #97 to #82 - shokonicci (01/21/2013) [-]
Actually, there have been studies showing that people with two moms or two dads do just as well as families with one mom and one dad.
#99 to #82 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
fak u
#104 to #82 - nephritho (01/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
It's time to stop posting
#127 to #82 - leachan **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
TL;DR
TL;DR
+3
#157 to #82 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69 - darknesincontrol (01/21/2013) [-]
I think most of them will be dead in 40 years
User avatar #71 to #69 - darknesincontrol (01/21/2013) [-]
I mean they look so old, in that picture
User avatar #74 to #71 - farn (01/21/2013) [-]
those are the same people probably
#109 - nephritho (01/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Every generation we have to deal with these kind of "hardcore" ********* .
A long time ago a muslim friend of mine that I met through Runescape, said she was scared of homosexuals because she thought gay people would harm her or rape her.
mfw the stupidity.
User avatar #112 to #109 - sparkyoneonetwo (01/21/2013) [-]
My roommates work with a bunch of people from Russia and all the the Russian people say things like gay people are sick and are only gay to turn normal in to gays. That we are like vampires and wish to rule the world.
+2
#116 to #112 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #120 to #116 - sparkyoneonetwo (01/21/2013) [-]
That is what the 20 or so Russians that work at the subyway around here think
+1
#121 to #120 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #122 to #121 - sparkyoneonetwo (01/21/2013) [-]
I already ******* with them all the time. They like get all freak out at the fact I"m a furry so I'll go in there with my tail and stuff on when my roommates there and like hit on him and call him sexy and freaks them all out it's pretty funny
-1
#124 to #122 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #126 to #124 - sparkyoneonetwo (01/21/2013) [-]
They will like hide from me when I come in after I leave they talk to my roommate about getting me psychological help
#160 to #109 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
What a load of ******* crap, you just made that ship up. Why the **** would anyone think that gay people rape women?
#161 to #160 - nephritho (01/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I am not even that creative to make **** up like that.
User avatar #4 - ilolzville (01/20/2013) [-]
No, in 40 years they're all going to wonder WHY THE **** they wanted to get married in the first place. Because marriage destroys relationships.
User avatar #13 to #4 - thepyras (01/21/2013) [-]
That isn't really true. Bad relationships have ruined marriage.
User avatar #15 to #4 - sketchysketchist (01/21/2013) [-]
Yeah!
Did you know 100% of all divorces start with marriage.
0
#76 to #15 - mrgreatnames **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#232 - iownmicee (01/21/2013) [-]
Actually the protests against 'race mixing' have a valid point. In a perfect world yes, people of all races could happily live near eachother and there would be no such thing as racism. However, we do not live in such world. How do we create a society that is as close to perfect as it gets? We separate races. That way, no ******** , no racism. 'Humans are all equal, regardless of skin colour'; true, every human has the same rights, however, cultural beliefs, norms and religion still separate us. There's going to be conflicts. Solution: separate societies according to race and/or religion, no society wealthier than the other.

I realise it is theoratically flawless, though impossible in practice. Just like communism.

Commence the red thumbs
User avatar #239 to #232 - spearpwi (01/21/2013) [-]
The village I work and live in completely proves that point annoyingly. The only anomaly is the children who do not give a **** about any of that. We got Indians, Afghans, Fijians, even Scotts! These kids just do not give a **** .
User avatar #315 to #232 - drfreeman (01/21/2013) [-]
or we wait a little and breed together until there are no "Races" and just one people. Were all humans, and in this time we can go anywhere. There are white people from Africa, and Black people from Canada. Color doesn't mean much, we are all human.
User avatar #256 to #232 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
but then families would be separated because of religion and race and that would be horrible, what if some one in your family turned Muslim and then had to be seperated so you would never see them again, or if your Dad was black then you wouldn't agree with it
#273 to #256 - iownmicee (01/21/2013) [-]
As I said, impossible in practice.
User avatar #350 to #273 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
but it would not be the perfect world as people would get depressed and be torn apart. It may be a perfect world for you but you have to look at both perspectives, if this law was in place I would be separated from my family as I am an atheist
User avatar #163 - biggrand (01/21/2013) [-]
Something i'm starting to ask myself, does anyone really need to be married? I mean if you'r gay or lesbian and want to be my guest, but do you need a ring to love each other? do you need to make a physical statement of your own love life to feel secure about it?
#166 to #163 - winsanity (01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage is just a celebration of love, thats like asking the question of whats the point in christmas, birthdays etc. we still celebrate the occasion mainly because of tradition but also for the meaning behind the celebration as well.
#164 to #163 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
If they get sick, you can't help them.
Marriage bonds more than just love.
User avatar #18 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
The thing is if 80% of Americans voted against gay marriage it would be more important for democracys sake that it be illegal rather than the moral justification of it being legalised.

User avatar #19 to #18 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
That's why normal states are "state of laws", in which laws prevent "the tyranny of the majority".
Picture this: if over 50% of the US population voted that a certain individual be condemned to death, do you think that gives them any authority over the existing laws?
User avatar #20 to #19 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Not massively law how the American system work, in Europe we have European human rights laws and stuff that are more important than countries laws
User avatar #21 to #20 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I know that EU laws > country laws, but that's why EU insists a lot of respecting the state of law.
User avatar #22 to #21 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Whats your view on gun control in America ?
User avatar #23 to #22 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Tighten and reglement the **** out of it. If it works here, it's sure as hell advisable to do it there.
User avatar #24 to #23 - PubLandlord (01/21/2013) [-]
Where abouts are you from, this guy in an online debate sums up Americas gun laws really well

www.debate.org/debates/Guns-should-be-banned-in-the-united-states./1/

Just scroll down to read the debate
User avatar #26 to #24 - tkfourtwoone ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Romania, so having a communist regime that controlled everything up to 23 years ago (despite having good relations & weapons shipping with close Muslim countries) is kind of a good point.
Here, not only are the guns kept a very close eye at (although one could get a tear-gas pistol or airsoft replicas with somewhat ease), but most can't afford them, either.

Will read the article when I get home.
-6
#233 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #311 to #233 - drfreeman (01/21/2013) [-]
Discrimination. Ignorance. It's all the same.
0
#313 to #311 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #321 to #313 - drfreeman (01/21/2013) [-]
I was referring to the similarities between racist and homophobic behavior. It's all just senseless hate fueled by uneducated scum of the earth.
-1
#361 to #321 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#476 to #361 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #252 to #233 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
how is it different?
0
#314 to #252 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #499 to #314 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
I didn't block you, when there are too many purple lines you can not comment any more, I raised some questions and you ignored them and just told me your opinions of me, how would this in any way prove me wrong!? that is what is ignorant, I haven't ignored you in any way. This is what I want to know, why is it against your morals to think that gay people should be married? why would a group of people who base their views on religion rather than facts be more logical? Why have you been ignoring these points?
User avatar #348 to #314 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
in the terms of what o.p is trying to show us it is just as bad, either way you are judging and stereotyping someone for silly reasons.
0
#360 to #348 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #380 to #360 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't know why I said you I suppose I got so used to debating on the internet it became natural to accuse people
0
#428 to #380 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #471 to #428 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
I bet it is because you said that it made "o.p look stupid" (although he had a good point) and you said "not US" implying you were with the group of gay marriage protesters
0
#475 to #471 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #483 to #475 - thebritishguy (01/22/2013) [-]
and that is why you have red thumbs, what difference will it make to you gay people can't get married? it won't affect your life at all so stop being so selfish
0
#486 to #483 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #488 to #486 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
just because you are not the only person thinking it means it is any better, it makes no difference I bet the Nazi's used that excuse. why does it conflict with your views.
0
#489 to #488 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #490 to #489 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
well the group who says it is right are basing there opinions on facts such as there are several benefits with insurance that gay couples can't get without being married but there is no reason why they shouldn't be married. The group that says it's wrong are basing the belief on what it says in an old book that they believe is written by a wizard and says that women shouldn't teach or have authority over men.
User avatar #491 to #490 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
Which sounds more logical?
0
#492 to #491 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #493 to #492 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
you really are that ignorant aren't you? evading the point, I know the opposing argument it is that it says in the bible that marriage should be between a man and a women and gay people are among the lawless, unholy and sinners
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/1tim/1.html#10
0
#494 to #493 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #495 to #494 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
well then you are ignorant, I obviously know that you do not call him a wizard but the only difference between god and a wizard is he lives in some clouds or some **** and then there is the book which is old
0
#496 to #495 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#498 to #496 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #497 to #496 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
you are ignoring all of my points and questions and are just repeating yourself and then you call me ignorant?
#8 - xsap (01/21/2013) [-]
yea.. tell me how stupid the people were 40 years ago..
User avatar #30 to #8 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
I say we shoulda sent em back to africa immediately following the emancipation proclamation.. although I acknowledge a difference between a black man and a filthy ****** were still talking approx 1/5 that actually contribute to society where as the others will most likely try to talk your child into smoking..

and then proceed to rape them
#31 to #30 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
Interesting statement. But if I could interject, mastadong, you look like the worlds biggest douchebag cunt in your profile picture and you look like you'd **** your own sister for a slice of cheese. You look just as bad if not worse than the people you are describing.

And I bet you don't even like cheese.
User avatar #37 to #31 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
Although I think its adorable you think anyone values your opinion in the slightest :D
User avatar #35 to #31 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
Im just going to assume your a ****** judging by your ridiculous amount of vulgar language, the fact you feel the need to interject as anonymous, and what I can only imagine is a redneck/ hillbilly reference.

HEY ****** !! Get off mommys couch, get a job, deal with us "hillbillys", and become more than a fried chicken licken, kool aid sippin, crime statistic/ deadbeat.
User avatar #41 to #38 - mastadong (01/21/2013) [-]
I prefer "irritated" :)
#118 to #41 - thequeenofslime ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I'd be irritated too if I got verbally destroyed by an anon.
I'd be irritated too if I got verbally destroyed by an anon.
User avatar #55 to #41 - trueswordsman (01/21/2013) [-]
Hey asshole tell me why you think that they should be sent back to Africa.
#299 to #55 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
maybe because they are:
loud
smell like ****
dumb as ****
sitting on government/ tax payers money
64% of crime in the U.S is caused by blacks
shall i continue
User avatar #479 to #299 - mastadong (01/22/2013) [-]
^^^All about the facts baby.
Im done here.
User avatar #388 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
The reality of this situation is that the gays aren`t marrying for `love` they are marrying for financial benefits such as lower expenses per person and cross-employer health plans, not that they don`t deserve this, but marriage is not a right to have for everyone, it is a privilege, a privilege subjugated by christian and catholic law which BLATANTLY STATES that marriage is between man and woman only. If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it.
-1
#445 to #388 - rotinaj has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #458 to #445 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
>atheist religions
son what the actual **** .
#391 to #388 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
Marriage existed before the bible. Its not purely christian so they dont own the rights to it. Plus religious law and governmental law SHOULD NOT apply to each other. Religion has no place in politics.
User avatar #394 to #391 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Implying marriage is politics, implying marriage before religion.
#406 to #394 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
There were religions and marriages before Christianity dumbass. I'm talking about its up to the government to pass same sex laws i.e. POLITICS so religion has no right to say it shouldnt be passed. If marriage is only Christian how the **** did the ancient Egyptians and non-Christian countries marry for many years before the bible?
User avatar #413 to #406 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Ancient Egypt and non-christian countries married under theeir own religion, obviously. Marriage is all under religious affairs, I thought I made that clear.
User avatar #410 to #406 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Holy **** it`s like talking to Bill O`Reilly faggot version, first of all, get an account, second of all, please read, third, I never said there weren`t religions before christianity, fourth I said if there was a religion where gays can marry they should, please read before rebutting to refrain from looking like an ass.
#416 to #410 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
1) Dont rage because Im anon just because you cant form a legit argument
2) Im not gay Im just not an arrogant **** like you. I'm throwing legit arguments at you and you have no reputable come backs.
3) You said " implying marriage before religion" saying that marriages cant have existed before it. Which it did. So.. yeah you are a hypocrite and clearly dont read before you post.
Why should there be a religion where they should marry? Why not atheism WHICH I DID MENTION! There are Christians who accept gay marriage, atheists which accept it, muslims, jews etc. Just because YOU dont doesnt mean others dont.
Religion has no place in this. So dont ******* mention it. Its up to the government NOT religion. So it has no legit place in this argument.
Me read? Yeh... I just proved what an idiot you are. I had to repeat all my points here because you clearly are too stupid to have seen them.
User avatar #430 to #416 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Also I don't see you providing back-up for saying that marriage existed before religion, which it didn't, atheists can't be reverends who marry, and religon has everything to do with marriage, you saying it being under the state/government implies that there were forms of government before religious beliefs, I see history isn't your major.
#444 to #430 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
You dont need a reverend to marry. You sign a sheet idiot in an office.
"forms of government" can include tribes of cavemen where we didnt have idols we just hunted like animals. So yes, there were.
Just look it up. If you cant grasp my point that religion doesnt have place in deciding same sex laws your just a ******* idiot. One simple point just cant be grasped by that ignorant singular brain cell.
User avatar #450 to #444 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Ignorant of the fact of....?
User avatar #423 to #416 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
"If there is a religion that marries gays then go right the **** for it." I'm pretty sure I said that.
User avatar #449 to #423 - Keleth (01/21/2013) [-]
problem with that is, ITS ******* ILLEGAL!!!! thats the entire ******* problem!!!! MAKE IT LEGAL and then the churches that agree with it can do the ceremony!!
#435 to #423 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
"Religion has n0 place in this argument" AND religion doesnt decide whether same sex marriage is passed.
Pretty sure I said that about 4 times now. Religion has no place in deciding who marries who. THUS... this might be TOO hard for you to grasp... your entire argument is void. Every religion has people who accepts it anyway.
User avatar #443 to #435 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
My argument is that gays shouldn't marry under religions that disallow it, how is it void? it makes perfect sense.
#448 to #443 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
You said gay marriage is wrong because marriage is under Christian law. Which it ISNT.
My point is you're bringing religion into government. THEY decide the bill not some catholic loons so stop bringing them into it. They have no place. End of. NO religion in politics. Dont back up gay marriage as bad because of some pathetic Christian laws. They shouldnt mix.
User avatar #456 to #448 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Sorry I meant to say most marriages in america, I suppose that was the hole, too late to patch it up now. I never said gay marriage it bad, not did i state I was against it, I was being sensible toward the people against it and why, being an anti-theist I really don't see myself in another situation backing up the relgious people.
#396 to #388 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
Yes and in American law constitution reigns supreme over any other word
User avatar #398 to #396 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
When did I say that? I'm in canada ******** .
#408 to #388 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
>implying straight people arent doing that.

I think you'll find there are gays marrying for love just as much as there are straights abusing the system.
User avatar #414 to #408 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Read the whole paragraph please.
#422 to #414 - anon (01/21/2013) [-]
I did. Your religion comment is ******** . You dont need religion to get married retard.
User avatar #446 to #388 - Keleth (01/21/2013) [-]
if marriage was only recognized by the religious bodies, then i would agree its a little silly...but no...government sees marriage and they see civil partnerships as less. much less rights
User avatar #433 to #388 - lazaman (01/21/2013) [-]
OH COOL GUYS LOOK!
SOME ONE WHO "KNOWS" EVERYTHING SOME ONE IS FEELING WHEN DOING SOMETHING!

Because us gays are TOTALLY incapable of love, and we TOTALLY would never want to marry each other.

Mhm, thank you for enlightening me on MY feelings, thanks buddy!
User avatar #503 to #433 - shfreaksixninesix (01/31/2013) [-]
please don't attack me, this is an honest question. (I'm pro gay rights)
Why do you want to be_ married_? I understand that two people have the right to be together as a couple and be recognized as such, but why choose to go through an expensive ceremony, and vows that are trivial to think make a couple more couple-y when all that matters is that you love each other? not to side with #388, but you have to understand where hes coming from (albeit a very poorly put together point with loads of assumption) it kinda looks like the reaping of financial benefits. i guess what im saying is that, and this also applies to straight couples as well, why isn't the pure joy of love with another enough to be content instead of labeling oneself through an antiquated and, frankly redundant, ritual?
please no rage, it's only a question and i will gladly accept your answer, angry or not.
#473 to #433 - frohling (01/21/2013) [-]
hey lazaman we support your rights and everything, and I am not hating on you. but seriously bro don't be a fag :P
User avatar #437 to #433 - disiprine (01/21/2013) [-]
Perhaps I was a bit general with my words, *most gays *most marriages are under catholic law
#474 to #388 - instalation (01/21/2013) [-]
Please just shut up. You're giving the rest of us religious a bad name. ;~;

we're not all close minded assholes..
 Friends (0)