Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'FJ Logic' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (416)
[ 416 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#80 - misterkinz
Reply +151
(01/14/2013) [-]
**misterkinz rolls 66** 33
#82 to #80 - commanderbunbun
Reply +169
(01/14/2013) [-]
**commanderbunbun rolls 2** multiply by this
#98 to #82 - commanderbunbun
Reply +10
(01/14/2013) [-]
my whole life has lead up to this moment. i can now die a happy man.

candelja
#442 to #82 - misterkinz
Reply 0
(01/15/2013) [-]
we make a good team
#395 to #82 - ProjectDelta
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
#363 to #82 - darthjangopwnz
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
**darthjangopwnz rolled a random image posted in comment #1 at Mortal Kombat ** Just. Yes!
**darthjangopwnz rolled a random image posted in comment #1 at Mortal Kombat ** Just. Yes!
#97 to #82 - godofdubs
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
I approve.
#391 to #82 - bahjy
Reply -2
(01/14/2013) [-]
**bahjy rolls 9**
then add this
then subtract it.
#436 to #391 - commanderbunbun
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
no, you're not getting in on this
#149 to #82 - cashcow
Reply -4
(01/14/2013) [-]
See this is the exact ********. Why does no one on this site understand how incredibly probable it was that you rolled a 2. Same odds of rolling dubs.
#193 to #149 - luigimario **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#276 to #149 - elitejerkz
Reply -2
(01/14/2013) [-]
Chances of dubs - 1/10
Chances of rolling 2 - 1/10
Chances of rolling both = 1/100
#157 - niggasinafrika
Reply +86
(01/14/2013) [-]
**************** rolls 33** this is why i love funnyjunk logic
#175 to #157 - brothergrimm
Reply +5
(01/14/2013) [-]
#316 to #175 - chosencausefuckyou **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#178 to #175 - SILENCEnight
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#233 - armenia
Reply +82
(01/14/2013) [-]
**armenia rolls 88**
#239 to #233 - jjamesgordon
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#251 to #233 - xxkosukexx
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
**xxkosukexx rolls 528**
#225 - mrdarp
Reply +62
(01/14/2013) [-]
**mrdarp rolls 9,922** **** dubs.
#255 to #225 - xxkosukexx
Reply -3
(01/14/2013) [-]
**xxkosukexx rolls 4,395**
#364 to #225 - darthjangopwnz
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
Lol. dub dubs
#376 to #225 - ffx
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
get double dubs.
#440 to #225 - watermelonkittie
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
***** dubs.

Gets double dubs.
#234 to #225 - ergexgo
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
DUB DUB!
#227 to #225 - dubious
Reply +5
(01/14/2013) [-]
but.....two dubs.....
#267 - argonianmaidohonor
Reply +53
(01/14/2013) [-]
**argonianmaidohonor rolls 22**
First time trying this
#268 to #267 - argonianmaidohonor
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#56 - psychoepsilon
Reply +42
(01/13/2013) [-]
**psychoepsilon rolls 22**
#281 - jgk **User deleted account**
+35
has deleted their comment [-]
#305 - captainlhero **User deleted account**
+33
has deleted their comment [-]
#307 to #305 - captainlhero **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#322 to #305 - nefarian
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
#348 to #305 - sardukai
Reply +2
(01/14/2013) [-]
#273 - phanact
Reply +27
(01/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#262 - thegamerslife
Reply +25
(01/14/2013) [-]
**thegamerslife rolls 99**
#263 to #262 - thegamerslife
Reply -6
(01/14/2013) [-]
holy **** my first dubs! ok david, now don't ruin this with a stupid comment...****.
#119 - exploiterguyone
Reply -1
(01/14/2013) [-]
There is a 10% chance of getting dubs, if the algorithm is perfectly random.
I have a feeling that the algorithm is not perfectly random.
#122 to #119 - exploiterguyone
Reply -2
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 04**
#132 to #119 - exploiterguyone
Reply -1
(01/14/2013) [-]
After 10 rolls have been completed, 2 of them are dubs. If there is a 10% chance of dubs occurring, than the formula for deciding the chances of this happening is:

(.1)^2 x (.9)^8
= .00434
since there is a .43% chance of complete randomness resulting in 2 dubs out of 10 tries, It is reasonable to believe that the algorithm is not random, and is seeded to have an artificially large number of dubs.
#161 to #132 - swordguyoxd
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
look up the definition of algorithm
Then tell me what "the" you're referencing cause all I see here is a formula
#298 to #161 - exploiterguyone
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
The algorithm FJ uses to produce "random" numbers.
Algorithm, n:
a step-by-step procedure for solving a problem or accomplishing some end, especially by a computer

I refer to the code FJ's staff has written that produces integers. I have shown through statistical analysis that the algorithm is probably not random, and thus is seeded to produce an artificially high amount of doubles. I never said I was referring to my formula when I said algorithm, and i wasn't. You thumbed me down because you didn't understand the math I was using? spectacular.
#133 to #132 - exploiterguyone
Reply -1
(01/14/2013) [-]
the chance of 3/11 is

.1^3 x .9^8

.00043

.043% chance

Definitely seeded.
#120 to #119 - exploiterguyone
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#121 to #119 - exploiterguyone
Reply +22
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 11**
#124 to #121 - freakaleak
Reply +19
(01/14/2013) [-]
**freakaleak rolls 66** if you logic you dubs
#123 to #121 - exploiterguyone
Reply -3
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 53**
#125 to #123 - exploiterguyone
Reply -5
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 45**
#126 to #125 - exploiterguyone
Reply -4
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 72**
#127 to #126 - exploiterguyone
Reply -5
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 68**
#128 to #127 - exploiterguyone
Reply -4
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 97**
#129 to #128 - exploiterguyone
Reply -3
(01/14/2013) [-]
**exploiterguyone rolls 86**
#130 to #129 - dabugman
Reply +15
(01/14/2013) [-]
**dabugman rolls 88**
#66 - andrestrololol
Reply +22
(01/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#67 to #66 - spyrothehedgehog
Reply 0
(01/13/2013) [-]
wait. wat?
wait. wat?
#69 to #66 - lhjkk
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#118 to #66 - anon
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
That's a nice .gif you have.
#226 - dubious
Reply 0
(01/14/2013) [-]
These kinds of things never work
These kinds of things never work
#228 to #226 - rainbowdemo
Reply +21
(01/14/2013) [-]
**rainbowdemo rolls 22**
#229 to #228 - rainbowdemo
Reply -2
(01/14/2013) [-]
are you sure?
#230 to #228 - dubious
Reply -3
(01/14/2013) [-]
i'll see you on top rated comments while i'm thumbless....
#306 - robotrino
Reply +19
(01/14/2013) [-]
SO MANY ROLLFAGS IN THE COMMENTS
#308 to #306 - woddy
Reply -1
(01/14/2013) [-]
**woddy rolls 6** 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and you're not a faggot
#370 - hardcoreman
Reply +16
(01/14/2013) [-]
**hardcoreman rolls 88**
#1 - reactderp ONLINE
Reply +10
(01/13/2013) [-]
**reactderp rolls 74** not 22
#2 to #1 - chopyourhandoff [OP]
0
Comment deleted by chopyourhandoff [-]
#4 to #1 - tyrain
Reply +6
(01/13/2013) [-]
#287 - larvouille
Reply +9
(01/14/2013) [-]
**larvouille rolls 88**
#172 - spoonandfork
Reply +8
(01/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#166 - dragostarc
Reply +7
(01/14/2013) [-]
#3 - nozepicker
Reply +7
(01/13/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Nice one OP
#6 to #3 - chopyourhandoff [OP]
Reply 0
(01/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#111 to #3 - admiralen
Reply +1
(01/14/2013) [-]
why is it nice one? its the oldest repost in history... its been in comments more times then op sucked dick
#265 to #111 - nozepicker
Reply -1
(01/14/2013) [-]
Because I say so, because of reasons