Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#220 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
A spanking!? When i was younger, I was lucky to get that if my mom was tired! I got the SILVER STUDDED B.E ************* L. T. I never acted out again.
User avatar #213 - alphawolffifteen (12/28/2012) [-]
To be honest ,there are a lot of quality family values that are lost. Parents don't teach responsibility or priorities anymore. They just feed their kids, buy them stuff, and tell them to go to school. As a child, I was talk to respect others, to stay away from gangs, as well as the importance of education, staying away from drugs.alcohol, and anyone who offers me any. There are other things like morality and the value of life that are not taught to many kids these days. Parenting went out the window.
#215 to #213 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
take out the "these days" part and replace it with "forever throughout all of human history" and you'll be close.
User avatar #212 - BlockinYoAss (12/28/2012) [-]
The difference between spanking your child and beating them is HUGE. I got beat. Like full blown, punched in the face because I forgot to take the trash out beat. That is wrong. Spanking your child for acting like a spoiled cluster cunt is right and I agree with it
#239 to #212 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
Science disagrees and they don't rely on anecdotes
User avatar #209 - bitchpleaseshutup (12/28/2012) [-]
I was beaten as a kid and now I'm showing sociopathic tendencies My dad was an alcohol.
User avatar #211 to #209 - thecjism (12/28/2012) [-]
what kind of alcohol was he?
User avatar #207 - jzpotter (12/28/2012) [-]
You hit them, they'll remember the beating, they remember the beating they're afraid of you, if they're afraid of you, they'll hate you, if they hate you they'll rebel, and end up like these douchebags. Simple math.
#199 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
It's been scientifically conjectured that spanking children leads to lower IQs.
#205 to #199 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#208 to #205 - tyroneisanigger (12/28/2012) [-]
You're not intelligent, if you want to redeem yourself, you have the next post or reply back to prove your intelligence.
#210 to #208 - hocolol **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#197 - spartanthreetwo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#200 to #197 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
You're not just wrong, you're stupid.
#190 - peggscott (12/28/2012) [-]
"Spanking is abuse" 			********		!! I got it as a kid, and only when I deserved it!!... But never by my father... my dad never disciplined me, it was always my mother... Kind of like a good cop bad cop kinda thing I guess.
"Spanking is abuse" ******** !! I got it as a kid, and only when I deserved it!!... But never by my father... my dad never disciplined me, it was always my mother... Kind of like a good cop bad cop kinda thing I guess.
#185 - applejackownage **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #184 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Really? Really FJ? Spanking doesn't work and is suddenly child abuse? When did FJ become such a ******* useless pussy white knight fag site? I have cousins that are being raised by helicopter parents that believe in that **** . They also believe that Harry Potter is evil and Pokemon advocates belief in the actual theory of evolution. Their twelve year old son gropes women and drowns children and their sixteen year old daughter is a lying, selfish slut.

Spank your kids, faggots. Teach them who is in ******* control.
#188 to #184 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
And spanking kids leads to intolerant, homophobic psychopaths like yourself
User avatar #219 to #188 - BioLex (12/28/2012) [-]
I'm guessing you never got spanked
User avatar #195 to #188 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
It's mostly subjective, but I think I'm the sensible one here. I wasn't really beat as a child, but looking at my cousins makes me wish I was, and that they were too. I want to beat the **** out of them myself.
#230 to #195 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
>I wasn't beat as a child
>they weren't beat as a child
>I turned out to be a paragon of humanity
>They turned out to be complete *********

>must've been the beatings

******* logic
User avatar #234 to #230 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Did I say I got spanked?

Because I didn't.
#235 to #234 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
....that's exactly what I'm referring to. You're saying that not spanking turns people into ********* , yet here you are claiming not to be a complete ******** .
User avatar #243 to #235 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Did I say I wasn't a ******** ?

Because I am.

.. A ******** with common sense, to be specific. Just in case you try to mince my words.
#259 to #243 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
then by your own admission your entire outlook on life is completely worthless
thank you for that.
User avatar #265 to #259 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
inb4 you tried to mince my words, I already warned you about that. Plenty of ********* have tons more worth in this world and have much more plausible, beneficial opinions and moral values than you or people like you. They're just ********* to boot. That'd include me.
#187 to #184 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
please don't try to use anecdotal evidence to argue something that people have dedicated years of their life studying to conclude that you are very, very wrong.
User avatar #193 to #187 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Sorry to break it to ya, buddy, but that's the nature of psychology. You either add to a theory or break it, doesn't matter how many years you've got behind the research. No psychological theory stays in practice permanently. Look up Freud and then look up Skinner, do me a favor and compare and contrast the two. Remember that they were both logical practices in their time for a good number of years. After, come back and tell me which one makes more sense to you.
#225 to #193 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
ok, first off, don't be a pretentious douchebag who thinks they're the only one who knows about two of the most famous psychologists in recorded history. That said, yea, I know about them, and both perspectives are still considered valid in many ways. Science isn't about coming up with theories and then throwing them away when you come up with a new one. Most of the concepts that Freud talked about are still used, just not some of his more extreme ideas. Same with Skinner. But guess what the funniest part is. The theory that spanking does jack **** is the new theory that evolved out of existing theories and if history has shown anything, most of its precepts will be around for a very, very long time and will be added to and have small changes, but the framework was already set years ago.

Also funny, Skinner believed in positive reinforcement rather than negative sanctions.
User avatar #241 to #225 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Really? No way? You mean they're BOTH considered valid scientific theories, despite the fact that one was meant to contradict the other? I daresay, I think this pretentious douche-bag has taught anon something! Spanking isn't going out of style any time soon, and you shouldn't count your chickens before they hatch, because I doubt it will over some hippy theory that has just recently come into practice, and just as you inadvertently stated, it's been in practice twice as long. So, not counting subjectivity, physical discipline has twice the scientific backing through years of practice than any theory meant to disprove it has.
#183 - blutzcrunk (12/28/2012) [-]
**blutzcrunk rolled a random image posted in comment #2 at DERRRRRRRR KITTY PORTAL **   
<mfw false
**blutzcrunk rolled a random image posted in comment #2 at DERRRRRRRR KITTY PORTAL **
<mfw false
#181 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]

Let's all go with the expert opinion rather than your anecdotal "this is how it was for me" approach on this one.

Because the people who actually study this stuff for a living will tell you that when you spank a kid, they don't remember the lesson, they remember the beating. They see you as someone to listen to out of fear. They don't learn lessons with spanking, they learn to not cross you.

If you were spanked and you turned out ok, it probably wasn't because you were spanked.
User avatar #198 to #181 - ninjaspartan (12/28/2012) [-]
Yet that's the only method that effectively gets across the message. I doubt the messenger ever has anything to do with the content of the message, yet without him the message doesn't get delivered.
User avatar #179 - cloudshadowevil (12/28/2012) [-]
funny, its actually the complete opposite.
#178 - pukingrainbows (12/28/2012) [-]
ITT: people with no kids saying how people should raise their kids
ITT: people with no kids saying how people should raise their kids
#214 to #178 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
Well, they were kids before so doesn't that kind of give them a slight understanding of the concept? Maybe their situation being raised has left obvious marks on them that they can interpret and explain? But what do I know, I'm just an Anon.
User avatar #176 - justsomeunitedguy (12/28/2012) [-]
im not sure, he looks like he's enjoying it
#175 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
.....probably not
User avatar #174 - TheUsername (12/28/2012) [-]
Beating your kids don't teach them a lesson. Discipline does, and discipline doesnt only mean beating. Beating will most likely make it worse.
User avatar #203 to #174 - hundrings (12/28/2012) [-]
I couldn't agree more. I was never spanked or beaten. not once did my mother lay a hand on me, and she never had to either. She made her role and mine very clear without threatening or mentioning any physical punishment, and I love and respect her even more for it.
#173 - Rascal (12/28/2012) [-]
thats a sexual reference
User avatar #177 to #173 - drastronomy ONLINE (12/28/2012) [-]
should have replied to my comment dickcheese
 Friends (0)