x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #476 - ejaculation (12/21/2012) [+] (4 replies)
WBC is probably the closest thing you get to cunt
User avatar #482 to #476 - Kimy (12/21/2012) [-]
They don't have the depth or the warmth
User avatar #197 - pepemex (12/21/2012) [+] (27 replies)
That's intimidation
#205 to #204 - Giachianeo (12/21/2012) [-]
I doubt they're going to jail 50 people because they're stopping dicks from showing up and ruining things.
#194 - azraelthemage (12/21/2012) [-]
Woodbury you say.
#441 - abyss (12/21/2012) [-]
nicely done!
nicely done!
#319 - Ihazfunkitty (12/21/2012) [+] (5 replies)
can anyone tell me who those bapist church people are? i live in the netherlands...
can anyone tell me who those bapist church people are? i live in the netherlands...
#320 to #319 - gargoylez (12/21/2012) [-]
A cultish group of over zealous christians who expolit freedom of speech laws to pickett their dogma (along the lines of: God hates everyone who dies unnaturally). They go to the funerals of soldiers and dead children to celebrate their deaths because they believe that a non- natural death is the wrath of god. In other words, a bunch of obstinate asswacks who hide behind stupid laws and provoke assault so they can sue people and 						****					.
A cultish group of over zealous christians who expolit freedom of speech laws to pickett their dogma (along the lines of: God hates everyone who dies unnaturally). They go to the funerals of soldiers and dead children to celebrate their deaths because they believe that a non- natural death is the wrath of god. In other words, a bunch of obstinate asswacks who hide behind stupid laws and provoke assault so they can sue people and **** .
+7
#315 - cpthaze **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #245 - arsenalthegunners (12/21/2012) [+] (2 replies)
I have a question: What did the WBC do regarding this, I have heard of it but I don't know about it, can someone explain please?
User avatar #251 to #245 - rexthedino (12/21/2012) [-]
They made a statement that God sent the killer to kill the children because of gay marriage and that they would picket at the children's funeral.

So basically the most disrespectful thing that you can think of.
User avatar #171 - iwillforget (12/21/2012) [-]
would of been better if they showed up and got the **** kicked out of them
#400 - intxbeast (12/21/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Woodbury...
User avatar #309 - zzzanzitron (12/21/2012) [-]
**zzzanzitron rolls 66**
#164 - memesidk (12/21/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Oh, why hello there!
#119 - anonexplains (12/21/2012) [+] (9 replies)
Leaving this anonymously because I'm not in the mood to argue or defend my statement.

If I'm every diagnosed with a terminal disease, knowing I will die, I will show up to a WBC protest, whether it be a soldiers funeral, childrens funeral or whatever the case may be, and beat these mother ******* with a ******* bat. Run them down with a car. Don't force your ******* beliefs down anyones throat you insensitive, mind warped cunts.
User avatar #220 to #119 - coolcalx (12/21/2012) [-]
>says it's wrong to force one's beliefs down another's throat
>wants to murder people for doing so, therefore forcing his belief that no one should force their belief onto others

do you see the problem with your logic here?
I'm not a fan of the WBC either, I'm just saying that this is pretty illogical.
#77 - anonexplains (12/21/2012) [+] (2 replies)
If the westboro baptist church was ever in my town, i would personally kill everyone of them, why hasn't anyone done this yet?
#100 to #77 - vorrundenaus (12/21/2012) [-]
Because the law protects them from such violence, they are acting under the 1st amendment (freedom of speech) which therefore protects their rights to be raging assholes with blatantly wrong opinions.    
   
It's basically the same question a lot of people have asked "Where do we draw the line?" Where is the point where we stop protecting people because of the laws because their beliefs morally incorrect, but then people panic and say then how do we determine what's morally wrong or right and how do we determine when we would arrest someone based on their beliefs   
   
And then someone would say "What is this communist China I thought we lived in America." and people would actually start defending people just like WBC
Because the law protects them from such violence, they are acting under the 1st amendment (freedom of speech) which therefore protects their rights to be raging assholes with blatantly wrong opinions.

It's basically the same question a lot of people have asked "Where do we draw the line?" Where is the point where we stop protecting people because of the laws because their beliefs morally incorrect, but then people panic and say then how do we determine what's morally wrong or right and how do we determine when we would arrest someone based on their beliefs

And then someone would say "What is this communist China I thought we lived in America." and people would actually start defending people just like WBC
User avatar #73 - dejakkel (12/21/2012) [+] (4 replies)
... How does the WBC get the money to fund their travels?
User avatar #84 to #83 - alekshm (12/21/2012) [-]
MURRICA'
#469 - mrsafmafra (12/21/2012) [-]
It's beautiful..
It's beautiful..
#382 - kaboomz (12/21/2012) [-]
This image has expired
theres alot of red thumbs here...
#291 - feeniks (12/21/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Its called the world.
Its called the world.
User avatar #161 - whiteyswag (12/21/2012) [-]
Same thing happened in my hometown when those assholes came to protest the funeral of a soldier who was K.I.A. These dudes are pretty intimidating.
#10 - SmellyClaw (12/20/2012) [-]
Reminds me of the Chain of Freedom between the baltic countries to stop the Russians
 Friends (0)