Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#38 - cupotruth
Reply +1
(12/15/2012) [-]
It's fake, children are dead, it's a great day to be sad.
It's fake, children are dead, it's a great day to be sad.
#5 - tornwingsofangels
Reply +1
(12/15/2012) [-]
#573 - seylorm
Reply 0
(12/16/2012) [-]
Why is this on frontpage, while in the comments most the people are complaining this is and how we are all horrible persons?
#549 - eopfroggr
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#534 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Inspect element idiots...
#536 to #534 - anon
Reply 0
(12/16/2012) [-]
this did actually happen, i was an anon
#528 - skinless
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#441 - retris
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Yeeeaaahhhh if you've ever been on b there's a thread like that every day
#426 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
/b/ has a third time (seconds). Its a good fake but everyone on 4chan knows its a fake you faggot.
#260 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
What if the shooter wasn't going to kill anyone, but /b/ egged him on to deliver?
#281 to #260 - philliyoMLB
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
What if you're a dumbass newfag?
#646 to #260 - JosefRieper **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#241 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
So last year with the shootings in Oslo, people were disgusted, but this one is a huge joke? FJ, I don't understand you anymore.
#187 - ultimoz
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Thats pretty ******* creepy...
#176 - anonymouzx
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Did the dogs bark really get censored?
#177 to #176 - anonymouzx
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
*barf
silly brain
#152 - laxitup
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
I thought the joke was that he wouldn't make the news because this is the only thing they are covering... oh well
#133 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
So ninjastar, your saying a cop would go in and just shoot the first guy he seen? If thats the case then that person shouldn't be a cop to begin with. You have to access the situation the best you can under stress regardless of how emotional the experience. Im in the army and we don't just get to go gun blazing we have to use our heads. Stricter gun laws? sure why not. will it solve anything? absolutely not. If people want to go killing other people, not having a gun isn't going to stop them nor will it make it less convenient. Could the principal have stopped him BEFORE he killed all those kids if he had a gun? No one knows. there are a lot of variables, but trying would have been a lot better than doing nothing. If you have a fire that needs to be put out and you have a fire extinguisher, is it a guarantee that you can put the fire out? NOPE. but I'm sure you would try. Also the report said the principal had time to alert the school over the intercom... seems to me in my opinion he had 4 secs to draw a personal protection device (gun) and at least attempt to put our the fire if you will.... end rant
#164 to #133 - mclevantwo
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
assess*
#80 - pizzaragazza
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
didn't the cops kill him? I don't think he killed himself
#85 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
suicide by cop maybe?
#88 to #85 - pizzaragazza
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
true. I just still can't understand why anyone would do something like this.
#92 to #88 - iforgetwhattosay
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
being simply psychopathic or being so depressed you wish to die and take out a few others at the same time. those two characteristics is what caused columbine.
#87 to #80 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Nope he shot himself.
#72 - mikaelkid
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
What the... could it be????
#62 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Even if it wasnt fake.

The people of 4Chan. . .
#54 - anon
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
ITS FAKE YOU ******* FAGGET
#35 - ihasapie
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
Isn't there some archive for 4chan threads?
#36 to #35 - TimBisley
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
Threads are only archived after 4 requests i think
#19 - timguitar
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
The second comment is replying to a post not in the thread. Second comment is replying to a post ending in 1825. There is no 1825 in the thread.
#25 to #19 - adriaan
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
he could have made a typo, and meaning 1852
#28 to #25 - gabecello
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
You don't type the post numbers to reply to somebody, you just click on them...