Home Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #176 - anonymouzx (12/15/2012) [-]
Did the dogs bark really get censored?
User avatar #177 to #176 - anonymouzx (12/15/2012) [-]
*barf
silly brain
#171 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
I'm looking to become an elementary teacher someday. Should I give it a shot?
+1
#173 to #171 - anonymouzx has deleted their comment [-]
#169 - stavIIIiii (12/15/2012) [-]
mfw its shopped and real thread OP claimed to be troll
0
#183 to #169 - godof has deleted their comment [-]
#193 to #183 - mralice (12/15/2012) [-]
You apparently have never been to 4chan if you're asking for a link from something that happened in /b/ -_-;;
User avatar #166 - Hreidmar ONLINE (12/15/2012) [-]
Sure, the internet desensitizes us all. But 20 elementary school kids... not joke material, even for the internet, even for 4chan.
User avatar #165 - srskate (12/15/2012) [-]
I call ******** , I saw this thread last night, OP just changed the date on it
-24
#160 - thuntking **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#225 to #160 - creosote (12/15/2012) [-]
What the hell man? I mean, it was funny, but no...
What the hell man? I mean, it was funny, but no...
#205 to #160 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
Don't listen to the hypocrite fags who laugh at the evil in the world, but think that this evil is any different.
This was a funny post, I laughed. Green thumb for you.
#189 to #160 - ultimoz (12/15/2012) [-]
I am fighting off the smile trying to form on my face, god I'm a ****** up person...
User avatar #172 to #160 - anonymouzx (12/15/2012) [-]
Clever, but not cool.
#154 - funkmasterflex (12/15/2012) [-]
****					 this man, 						****					 4chan, that's so 						******					 up..... 						*******					 kids man, can't even say it's too soon to be appropriate to make fun of this.... it never will
**** this man, **** 4chan, that's so ****** up..... ******* kids man, can't even say it's too soon to be appropriate to make fun of this.... it never will
#153 - Milos (12/15/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#152 - laxitup (12/15/2012) [-]
I thought the joke was that he wouldn't make the news because this is the only thing they are covering... oh well
#133 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
So ninjastar, your saying a cop would go in and just shoot the first guy he seen? If thats the case then that person shouldn't be a cop to begin with. You have to access the situation the best you can under stress regardless of how emotional the experience. Im in the army and we don't just get to go gun blazing we have to use our heads. Stricter gun laws? sure why not. will it solve anything? absolutely not. If people want to go killing other people, not having a gun isn't going to stop them nor will it make it less convenient. Could the principal have stopped him BEFORE he killed all those kids if he had a gun? No one knows. there are a lot of variables, but trying would have been a lot better than doing nothing. If you have a fire that needs to be put out and you have a fire extinguisher, is it a guarantee that you can put the fire out? NOPE. but I'm sure you would try. Also the report said the principal had time to alert the school over the intercom... seems to me in my opinion he had 4 secs to draw a personal protection device (gun) and at least attempt to put our the fire if you will.... end rant
#164 to #133 - mclevantwo (12/15/2012) [-]
assess*
#131 - AlbertEinstein (12/15/2012) [-]
It's not porn, it doesn't need to be censored
#151 to #131 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
Would you show your mother?
-2
#158 to #151 - puffyspd has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #138 to #131 - puffyspd (12/15/2012) [-]
Are those the Columbine shooter's bodies?
User avatar #144 to #142 - puffyspd (12/15/2012) [-]
Wow, never knew there was a pic of it.
Interesting...
User avatar #170 to #144 - thefuzzywalrus (12/15/2012) [-]
go to rotten.com... they have alot of ****** up pics of dead people
User avatar #145 to #144 - toastycracker (12/15/2012) [-]
You need to login to view this link

It has a few more images. I'm sure there is a few sites that has more of the images from the people they shot.
User avatar #157 to #145 - puffyspd (12/15/2012) [-]
I don't fancy looking at gore but it's just interesting to see what it actually looked like instead of imaging it.
#134 to #131 - ohemgeezus (12/15/2012) [-]
It is gore though you idiot
User avatar #141 to #134 - AlbertEinstein (12/15/2012) [-]
Yeah, which is allowed.
#130 - drmcninja (12/15/2012) [-]
Thats actually not funny. I thought I was desensitized to it, but 20 elementary kids is too much for that to be funny, or cool, or anything. That's still just awful.
User avatar #136 to #130 - pedospartan (12/15/2012) [-]
i dont think he is trying to be funny, he is just pointing out how that might be the guy and how strange that is.
#126 - jibb (12/15/2012) [-]
User avatar #122 - HappyBus (12/15/2012) [-]
apparently westboro baptist church plans on picketing the funerals of these poor people. i think im heading down there to join the counter-protest.
User avatar #648 to #122 - fluffythetrashcan ONLINE (12/16/2012) [-]
oh god please tell me there not
User avatar #190 to #122 - ultimoz (12/15/2012) [-]
Pffft, counter protest. It'll turn into a massive brawl.
User avatar #185 to #122 - fpsnoob (12/15/2012) [-]
I don't get it. Why would they protest the funerals of little kids that were not related to the military or homosexuals?
User avatar #512 to #185 - flyingwhale (12/15/2012) [-]
because westboro
-6
#116 - epicpedo Comment deleted by ieatbengay [-]
User avatar #128 to #116 - mexirican (12/15/2012) [-]
can't wait for your child/parent to be shot in the face so i can copy and paste your comment towards you.
User avatar #112 - snaqbar (12/15/2012) [-]
Just another suicidal attention whore. Just plain tragic, made me **** angry when I saw this on the news yesterday.
User avatar #111 - freakaleak (12/15/2012) [-]
i dont care if this is fake or not. i wish he were still alive, so he could get tortured, slowly and painfully, for this for the rest of his life.
#148 to #111 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
when people go on mass killing sprees they always take the easy way out and kill themselves. they're too much of a ***** to actually deal with what they have done
User avatar #143 to #111 - muzikmafia (12/15/2012) [-]
I... concur.
#139 to #111 - kusalranawaka (12/15/2012) [-]
He wouldn't, he would get a nice jail cell with free round the cock food for the rest of his life
He wouldn't, he would get a nice jail cell with free round the cock food for the rest of his life
User avatar #501 to #139 - doctrine (12/15/2012) [-]
He'd get ******* shanked by the other prisoners. The guards would look the other way for somebody like that.
User avatar #237 to #139 - desucakes (12/15/2012) [-]
Around the cock?
#179 to #139 - mrusername (12/15/2012) [-]
Was the 'cock' intentional? Because he is OP?
#275 to #179 - kusalranawaka (12/15/2012) [-]
haha no but it works too
#174 to #139 - thefuzzywalrus (12/15/2012) [-]
which is ******** ... we seriously should put people like that to death...

and if someones peace hippy ******** reply of "well what if they dont want to die?" yeah ?well im pretty sure those little kids and his mother didnt want to die either why the **** should we let him live?
#278 to #174 - kusalranawaka (12/15/2012) [-]
If we were to put one person to death soon we would put other to death. The standards for the death penalty would soon decrease and even people with minor crimes would be killed.

As bad as this sounds there are people who have committed worse crimes who are alive.
User avatar #114 to #111 - waafflle (12/15/2012) [-]
That moment when you realize that you're more ****** up than he was...
User avatar #115 to #114 - freakaleak (12/15/2012) [-]
how was that even near how ****** up as him?
User avatar #120 to #115 - waafflle (12/15/2012) [-]
Sorry, that's just one of my pet peeves. I can't think of a single person in the world who deserves to get ******* TORTURED for the rest of their life. Maybe he deserved to get tortured for like, 5 years, but after a while, you gotta say "Okay, mercy."
User avatar #125 to #120 - freakaleak (12/15/2012) [-]
killing children is too far, he deserves to be tortured for like 5 lifetimes. and i still would never forgive him.
#132 to #125 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
I agree that killing children is too far, but you're going a bit over the top with the whole torture idea...
User avatar #135 to #132 - freakaleak (12/15/2012) [-]
i feel like people should get what they deserve. the gunman not only killed the children and adults, but hes putting thousands of people through their own form of torture right now. the parents and family members of the children are suffering because of him. if thousands of lives are suffering because of him, 5 lifetimes is punny compared to that. but thats just me.
User avatar #127 to #125 - waafflle (12/15/2012) [-]
Wow, that's pretty damn sad my friend.
User avatar #129 to #127 - freakaleak (12/15/2012) [-]
opinions, opinions.
#140 to #129 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
i personally believe he should be tortured for 27 lifetimes. or perhaps 1 lifetime for every person that must suffer from the death of a loved one... sandy hook is a very small, close knit community and the atmosphere in connecticut right now is reminiscent of when the petit ******* took place
#107 - cashcow (12/15/2012) [-]
I got -6 thumbs when I posted this. Oh how funnyjunk baffles me some times.
I got -6 thumbs when I posted this. Oh how funnyjunk baffles me some times.
#93 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
The US has had many situations like this, where innocents are killed by someone going on a rampage with a gun. Do they change the gun laws? no.
BUT ONE LITTLE KID HAS A KINDER EGG AND CHOKES AND NOW IT'S ILLEGAL!

You say you're free in your country, but when every single person around you has a confined weapon are you really going to say to my face that you're okay with that? that a random person can kill you at anytime? To be free is to live without fear. But you carry a gun, just in case someone else pulls a gun on you.

If you make guns illegal all these shooting would be a lot less common.

But I'm a dreamer, the government would never take the time to do that as it would require altering the constitution. Plus 1000's of people would lose their jobs.

Just my opinion INB4 red thumbs.
User avatar #137 to #93 - pedospartan (12/15/2012) [-]
why dont you login and say that?
#105 to #93 - asulen (12/15/2012) [-]
Someone with more ambition to actually do stuff get the stats for the number of people car accidents have killed versus shootings; I'm assuming its WAY higher. Say something like, "Ban cars, too?"
#103 to #93 - defender (12/15/2012) [-]
Making guns illegal? You see criminals don't follow the law and still get guns, all you would do is take guns away from the good people of society. Read the news some nut job in china when on a stabbing rampage at a elementary with a knife.
#102 to #93 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
Leaving ourselves defenseless and giving more power to the government isn't the way to solve things. whether it is legal or illegal, men like the one who did that horrible act will find a way on doing it. if someone is that hellbound to do that kind of evil, laws wont be the thing stopping them. I refuse to lay down and be killed all because the government and stupid liberals want me to have no protection. the police cant be everywhere at once. it takes10 minutes on average for an officer to show up to a scene, wont take that chance.
User avatar #100 to #93 - MUTHAFUDGE (12/15/2012) [-]
Guns aren't allowed in London England, and that place is ****** horrible...just sayin.
#149 to #100 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
I don't think London is too bad, you never hear of shootings like this in the UK. It's harder to get guns here because of the ultra strict laws on them. Hell even having a toy plastic gun in public can get you arrested. I am not saying that there is -no- gun crime here, of course there is some. If criminals really want to get their hands on them that badly then they will find a way, it is just a lot easier in the US to get one, thus more people have them, and the more people with guns the more gun crime. There is a lot knife crime in the UK though... which sucks.
User avatar #155 to #149 - MUTHAFUDGE (12/15/2012) [-]
Ya, there's no guns where I live either (Canada) but people get stabbed instead. I hear every week about someone else getting stabbed, and two days ago, someone even got jumped in his home by three guys with a baseball bat. The fact of the matter is that we're humans, and we are capable of killing in more ways than just with a gun, and if you wanted to stop all the killing, you would have to basically ban everything. Hell, I could pick up my guitar and go on a mass killing spree with it. Not to mention, no matter what, people will still get their hands on guns.
User avatar #99 to #93 - phunkyzilla (12/15/2012) [-]
>the government would never take the time to do that

that's because it's unconstitutional anon
User avatar #95 to #93 - CaptinAwesome (12/15/2012) [-]
SOOOOO, banning guns will make all the gun-crimes just go away?
Cause ya know, banning ****** , meth, cocaine, made all of those problems go away.
Next thing ya know there will be a "War on Guns"
the sense that will make if it ever comes to that.
AND, if there is a Banning of all of my precious guns, i shall be a criminal, as with my entire family.
Sounds like the american government.
#104 to #95 - anonymous (12/15/2012) [-]
so you think banning guns will have no effect what so ever?
To think that it would remove gun-crimes entirely, is not only naive, it's stupid.
Banning guns would greatly reduce killings. I think even you have to realize that.
But the way you put it? It sounds like you wont ban guns if it *only* saves some.
There will always be people breaking the law, there will always be people who refuse to live by the rules.
... What am I doing, I ******* hate americans, you guys are the most retarded nation on earth, you used to be cool.
You dense ************* .
#119 to #104 - muffinspecial (12/15/2012) [-]
I don't know, it might actually increase killings for a while, considering they would have to get a warrant for 90% of homes to look for guns. It's honestly more trouble than it's worth.
User avatar #108 to #104 - battledude (12/15/2012) [-]
your the dense mother ******

take away the defense of random people means any criminal that gets his hand on a gun can go on a killing spree with no interruptions until police come
User avatar #106 to #104 - CaptinAwesome (12/15/2012) [-]
I cannot see a reduction in gun related deaths just because of a gun ban. i see an increase.
Mainly because criminals will know law abiding people will not have a weapon to defend themselves. thus, increasing the testicle size of criminals.
 Friends (0)