Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #24 - ccam (11/24/2012) [-]
I'm an American, and I find this funny.
#23 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
During the invasion:
"We're taking Canada by force!"
"Oh geez, are we inconveniencing you, sorry. We weren't ready for this, do you want to come in, we'll have some pancakes and maple syrup ready in a minute"
User avatar #68 to #23 - jibbernut (11/24/2012) [-]
"It's, well you see, well we haven't cleaned the national forests in awhile and we just didn't know we would be having the company. So if you can excuse the mess your welcome to stay for a time the suits you and your schedule."
#22 - AnonymousDonor (11/24/2012) [-]
its kinda funny
User avatar #17 - mynameisgeorge (11/24/2012) [-]
1. Afghanistan was given a warning to hand over the members of Al Qaeda who were responsible or they would be attacked. They refused to give them up, so we bombed them. Afghanistan was asked a second time to relinquish the attackers after the initial strike, to which they responded by training them, so we attacked again and toppled the government.
2. In reference to the Canada/Iraq analogy, the UAE would only attack Canada if the Prime Minister of Canada seized power and used chemical warfare on civilians for being in a different sect of the same religion.
3. It is probably more immoral to topple a hostile government and then leave without rebuilding it. We still send aid to Iraq, but our troops aren't there to keep the peace. Even Germans and Australians are still there.

TL;DR I'm tired of the retarded "Hurr USA is the worst" posts. They are almost always nonfactual and/or ridiculously blown out of proportion.
#177 to #17 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
"Hurr Usa is the worst" lol

actually not the usa but the u.s americans, i mean come on you elected a guy like bush twice because he said "we will protect our freedom, al-qaida, 9/11, freedom; bin laden, hurr"

there is always happening some sort of **** just before the next elections like killing a guy named bin laden and show off the evidence
0
#213 to #177 - lefish has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #143 to #17 - defeats (11/24/2012) [-]
Afghanistan and Iraq*
User avatar #122 to #17 - defeats (11/24/2012) [-]
While I agree with your points, the joke was that Americans attacked them, so they attacked Canada, a neighbouring country.
Because after 9/11/2001, which was a Saudi attack (Osama Bin laden), America invaded Iraq.
#106 to #17 - dcj (11/24/2012) [-]
...you are far too smart to be on this website.
User avatar #79 to #17 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
THANK YOU!
(I'm not American but I agree so hard)
#60 to #17 - penguinthegreat (11/24/2012) [-]
are you saying afganistan didn't want to hand over the members of the Al Qaeda
are you sure that they knew where they were and had the firepower and the men to do it?
#56 to #17 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
Funny how Americunts always think they decide over every other being in this world. Also you ********* don't attack without any profit for you. Why invade Iraq? WMD's? Where? I haven't seen them have you? Protecting the people against their leader? So why don't you attack Syria? Because they have no oil? And how about the Palestinian people? If USgay is so good and caring about innocent people then why won't you protect them? Okey not all Palestinians are good but go kill Hamas and stop your Jewish buttbuddies in exterminating a entire race maybe.

TL;DR: I'm tired of Americans protecting what they and believing everything they do is great because MURRICA **** YEAH and who can't accept any criticism. Naive ********* .
#207 to #56 - nitsuan (11/24/2012) [-]
There is in no way shape or form a reaction picture to describe how stupid you are, so I will just leave you with this.
User avatar #61 to #56 - sketchE ONLINE (11/24/2012) [-]
1. WMDs are not just nukes. they include chemical weapons which mynameisgeorge pointed out.
2. when we went into Iraq we had at least half of europe on our heels. syria isnt using cern gas on its people yet from what ive heard.
3. the U.S. isnt getting any oil from iraq its all going to europe.
4. israel gave the gaza strip back to whoever rightfully owned it and they allowed hamas to move into it. also the U.S. did help by sending Hilary Clinton over to help with diplomatic solutions. seemed to work since the cease fire was declared.

thank you for proving my fellow users point
0
#69 to #61 - klavi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #71 to #69 - sketchE ONLINE (11/24/2012) [-]
im sorry say that again. the U.S. going where in post 3?
User avatar #51 to #17 - spoonless (11/24/2012) [-]
My god you're thick...
User avatar #46 to #17 - jibb (11/24/2012) [-]
>so we bombed them

I like how 3000 deaths is reason enough for bombing.
User avatar #185 to #46 - blacksmithgu (11/24/2012) [-]
Out of curiosity, what exactly would you do in retaliation of 3000 deaths?
User avatar #190 to #185 - theoriginalzombie (11/24/2012) [-]
he'd probably protest the slaughter of chickens or something
User avatar #101 to #46 - conquer (11/24/2012) [-]
...id wreck the **** out of someone's entire family if they just gave me friend a titty twister. hell yea, i'd bomb because of 3000 deaths
#32 to #17 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
But USA is the worst
it's a fact
-2
#31 to #17 - mackigol has deleted their comment [-]
#35 to #31 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
http:// [url deleted] /p/news/international/ usdidfindiraqwmd_AYiLgNbw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM
remove the spaces.

For the record its better news that the US invaded Iraq on false presets than it is to tell the world they where right.

#20 to #17 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
Afghanistan offered to give the U.S. Bin Laden twice if the U.S. would stop the bombing runs so............ Don't believe me google it, the BBC covered the story
User avatar #182 to #20 - blacksmithgu (11/24/2012) [-]
Offering and actually doing can be two very different things, especially considering that Afghanistan hated America and essentially still does, whatever the media may say.
User avatar #78 to #20 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
BBC is full of ****
User avatar #84 to #78 - lordmoldywart (11/24/2012) [-]
is the most respected news corporation in the entire world*
User avatar #93 to #84 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
doesn't matter. It has an obvious left winged bias. In the recent conflict between Israel and Gaza it has shown a bunch of pictures of Syrian casualties from the civil war and presented them as Gazans. It also showed a bunch of Israeli sites hit by rockets and said they are Gazan building hit by Israeli bombings... I wouldn't be surprised if it made more **** up regarding the USA
0
#243 to #93 - futuramafan has deleted their comment [-]
#196 to #93 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
Reality has a left-wing bias.
#201 to #196 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
Beautiful comment there, fellow anon.
User avatar #195 to #93 - lordmoldywart (11/24/2012) [-]
Yes it does matter

If you have proof to back up those 'left wing bias' claims, I suggest you write a kind letter to the director general of the bbc explaining your feelings
User avatar #197 to #195 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
my feelings? there has been plenty of solid evidence proving it. I mean people recording things that were wrong, I have pictures of everything I'm saying
User avatar #200 to #197 - lordmoldywart (11/24/2012) [-]
Show that 'evidence' in your letter to the director general
User avatar #204 to #200 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-l59qL2Xo8

just the first piece they show here - it's a part of what I'm talking about
User avatar #210 to #204 - lordmoldywart (11/24/2012) [-]
I'm not disputing your evidence, it's the director general who needs to hear your up-most important words of concern
User avatar #215 to #210 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
they and many other networks have been confronted about these. The usual response is "all media has a bias and we can't avoid making mistakes once in a while." I don't think we can change the fact reporters will always lie to some extent, but what we can change is how seriously we take them. Never fully trust anything you read/watch. I don't.
User avatar #231 to #215 - lordmoldywart (11/24/2012) [-]
You don't wear tin foil hats by any chance, do you?
User avatar #232 to #231 - deansg (11/24/2012) [-]
I'm not a consipracist... I don't support any crazy theories, I just think all media is biased and you should approach it very cautiously
#194 to #93 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/24/2012) [-]
i don't know why you get thumbed down.

people here think bbc is "true" and "respected" because it shows more about casualties, but that's true that they show them in a way they like. bbc isn't more true than any other channel out there, they just show more "bad" things others will not show you... they still "lie"... at least many other news channels don't show them at all....
#16 - clowheights (11/24/2012) [-]
why canada though?
User avatar #47 to #16 - chaossniper (11/24/2012) [-]
caus when afgani attacked the us, america attacked irac
#77 to #47 - thereasonableperso (11/24/2012) [-]
You accidently that sentence
User avatar #72 to #47 - floridazombie (11/24/2012) [-]
yeah... but they did attack Afghanistan first?
#15 - heartlessrobot (11/24/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I think we should have just crashed a plane into the Ka'aba.
User avatar #4 - MCPO (11/24/2012) [-]
Neither are you.
User avatar #3 - malific (11/24/2012) [-]
ARE ******* KIDDING ME?

There's no way the UAE would be stupid enough to attack Canada. Canada would kick their ******* asses!
User avatar #5 to #3 - codyxvasco (11/24/2012) [-]
What are they going to do? Peace them to death?
User avatar #6 to #5 - malific (11/24/2012) [-]
Who the **** do you think has the bear cavalry? Russians? They can't afford that **** .
#259 to #6 - eggoman (11/24/2012) [-]
Relevant picture evidence
0
#227 to #6 - thumbsalad has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #54 to #6 - spoonless (11/24/2012) [-]
I mean they have bears. They just can't afford to outfit them.
#13 to #6 - thesoulless (11/24/2012) [-]
As if they could even get past our navy.

Pic related
User avatar #8 to #6 - thefurie (11/24/2012) [-]
Why would a russian ride a russian? I mean a Bear on a bear is a little excessive
#55 to #8 - spoonless (11/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 - deadmuerto (11/23/2012) [-]
AND PROM'S TOMORROW!!!!!!!!!
#1 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/23/2012) [-]
OP, go be a faggot somewhere else
 Friends (0)