Upload
Login or register
Back to the content '2021' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (247)
[ 247 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#24 - ccam
Reply -1
(11/24/2012) [-]
I'm an American, and I find this funny.
#23 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
During the invasion:
"We're taking Canada by force!"
"Oh geez, are we inconveniencing you, sorry. We weren't ready for this, do you want to come in, we'll have some pancakes and maple syrup ready in a minute"
#68 to #23 - jibbernut
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
"It's, well you see, well we haven't cleaned the national forests in awhile and we just didn't know we would be having the company. So if you can excuse the mess your welcome to stay for a time the suits you and your schedule."
#22 - AnonymousDonor
Reply +6
(11/24/2012) [-]
its kinda funny
#17 - mynameisgeorge
Reply +56
(11/24/2012) [-]
1. Afghanistan was given a warning to hand over the members of Al Qaeda who were responsible or they would be attacked. They refused to give them up, so we bombed them. Afghanistan was asked a second time to relinquish the attackers after the initial strike, to which they responded by training them, so we attacked again and toppled the government.
2. In reference to the Canada/Iraq analogy, the UAE would only attack Canada if the Prime Minister of Canada seized power and used chemical warfare on civilians for being in a different sect of the same religion.
3. It is probably more immoral to topple a hostile government and then leave without rebuilding it. We still send aid to Iraq, but our troops aren't there to keep the peace. Even Germans and Australians are still there.

TL;DR I'm tired of the retarded "Hurr USA is the worst" posts. They are almost always nonfactual and/or ridiculously blown out of proportion.
#177 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
"Hurr Usa is the worst" lol

actually not the usa but the u.s americans, i mean come on you elected a guy like bush twice because he said "we will protect our freedom, al-qaida, 9/11, freedom; bin laden, hurr"

there is always happening some sort of **** just before the next elections like killing a guy named bin laden and show off the evidence
#213 to #177 - lefish
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#143 to #17 - defeats
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Afghanistan and Iraq*
#122 to #17 - defeats
Reply -1
(11/24/2012) [-]
While I agree with your points, the joke was that Americans attacked them, so they attacked Canada, a neighbouring country.
Because after 9/11/2001, which was a Saudi attack (Osama Bin laden), America invaded Iraq.
#106 to #17 - dcj
Reply +3
(11/24/2012) [-]
...you are far too smart to be on this website.
#79 to #17 - deansg
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
THANK YOU!
(I'm not American but I agree so hard)
#60 to #17 - penguinthegreat
Reply +2
(11/24/2012) [-]
are you saying afganistan didn't want to hand over the members of the Al Qaeda
are you sure that they knew where they were and had the firepower and the men to do it?
#56 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Funny how Americunts always think they decide over every other being in this world. Also you ********* don't attack without any profit for you. Why invade Iraq? WMD's? Where? I haven't seen them have you? Protecting the people against their leader? So why don't you attack Syria? Because they have no oil? And how about the Palestinian people? If USgay is so good and caring about innocent people then why won't you protect them? Okey not all Palestinians are good but go kill Hamas and stop your Jewish buttbuddies in exterminating a entire race maybe.

TL;DR: I'm tired of Americans protecting what they and believing everything they do is great because MURRICA **** YEAH and who can't accept any criticism. Naive *********.
#207 to #56 - nitsuan
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
There is in no way shape or form a reaction picture to describe how stupid you are, so I will just leave you with this.
#61 to #56 - sketchE
Reply +5
(11/24/2012) [-]
1. WMDs are not just nukes. they include chemical weapons which mynameisgeorge pointed out.
2. when we went into Iraq we had at least half of europe on our heels. syria isnt using cern gas on its people yet from what ive heard.
3. the U.S. isnt getting any oil from iraq its all going to europe.
4. israel gave the gaza strip back to whoever rightfully owned it and they allowed hamas to move into it. also the U.S. did help by sending Hilary Clinton over to help with diplomatic solutions. seemed to work since the cease fire was declared.

thank you for proving my fellow users point
#69 to #61 - klavi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#71 to #69 - sketchE
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
im sorry say that again. the U.S. going where in post 3?
#51 to #17 - spoonless
Reply +7
(11/24/2012) [-]
My god you're thick...
#46 to #17 - jibb
Reply +8
(11/24/2012) [-]
>so we bombed them

I like how 3000 deaths is reason enough for bombing.
#185 to #46 - blacksmithgu
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Out of curiosity, what exactly would you do in retaliation of 3000 deaths?
#190 to #185 - theoriginalzombie
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
he'd probably protest the slaughter of chickens or something
#101 to #46 - conquer
Reply +1
(11/24/2012) [-]
...id wreck the **** out of someone's entire family if they just gave me friend a titty twister. hell yea, i'd bomb because of 3000 deaths
#32 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
But USA is the worst
it's a fact
#31 to #17 - mackigol
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#35 to #31 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
http:// [url deleted] /p/news/international/ usdidfindiraqwmd_AYiLgNbw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM
remove the spaces.

For the record its better news that the US invaded Iraq on false presets than it is to tell the world they where right.

#20 to #17 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Afghanistan offered to give the U.S. Bin Laden twice if the U.S. would stop the bombing runs so............ Don't believe me google it, the BBC covered the story
#182 to #20 - blacksmithgu
Reply +3
(11/24/2012) [-]
Offering and actually doing can be two very different things, especially considering that Afghanistan hated America and essentially still does, whatever the media may say.
#78 to #20 - deansg
Reply +1
(11/24/2012) [-]
BBC is full of ****
#84 to #78 - lordmoldywart
Reply +2
(11/24/2012) [-]
is the most respected news corporation in the entire world*
#93 to #84 - deansg
Reply -4
(11/24/2012) [-]
doesn't matter. It has an obvious left winged bias. In the recent conflict between Israel and Gaza it has shown a bunch of pictures of Syrian casualties from the civil war and presented them as Gazans. It also showed a bunch of Israeli sites hit by rockets and said they are Gazan building hit by Israeli bombings... I wouldn't be surprised if it made more **** up regarding the USA
#243 to #93 - futuramafan
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#196 to #93 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Reality has a left-wing bias.
#201 to #196 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Beautiful comment there, fellow anon.
#195 to #93 - lordmoldywart
Reply -1
(11/24/2012) [-]
Yes it does matter

If you have proof to back up those 'left wing bias' claims, I suggest you write a kind letter to the director general of the bbc explaining your feelings
#197 to #195 - deansg
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
my feelings? there has been plenty of solid evidence proving it. I mean people recording things that were wrong, I have pictures of everything I'm saying
#200 to #197 - lordmoldywart
Reply -1
(11/24/2012) [-]
Show that 'evidence' in your letter to the director general
#204 to #200 - deansg
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-l59qL2Xo8

just the first piece they show here - it's a part of what I'm talking about
#210 to #204 - lordmoldywart
Reply -1
(11/24/2012) [-]
I'm not disputing your evidence, it's the director general who needs to hear your up-most important words of concern
#215 to #210 - deansg
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
they and many other networks have been confronted about these. The usual response is "all media has a bias and we can't avoid making mistakes once in a while." I don't think we can change the fact reporters will always lie to some extent, but what we can change is how seriously we take them. Never fully trust anything you read/watch. I don't.
#231 to #215 - lordmoldywart
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
You don't wear tin foil hats by any chance, do you?
#232 to #231 - deansg
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
I'm not a consipracist... I don't support any crazy theories, I just think all media is biased and you should approach it very cautiously
#194 to #93 - anon
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
i don't know why you get thumbed down.

people here think bbc is "true" and "respected" because it shows more about casualties, but that's true that they show them in a way they like. bbc isn't more true than any other channel out there, they just show more "bad" things others will not show you... they still "lie"... at least many other news channels don't show them at all....
#16 - clowheights
Reply +15
(11/24/2012) [-]
why canada though?
#47 to #16 - chaossniper
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
caus when afgani attacked the us, america attacked irac
#77 to #47 - thereasonableperso
Reply +1
(11/24/2012) [-]
You accidently that sentence
#72 to #47 - floridazombie
Reply +2
(11/24/2012) [-]
yeah... but they did attack Afghanistan first?
#15 - heartlessrobot
Reply +1
(11/24/2012) [-]
This image has expired
I think we should have just crashed a plane into the Ka'aba.
#4 - MCPO
Reply -2
(11/24/2012) [-]
Neither are you.
#3 - malific
Reply +83
(11/24/2012) [-]
ARE ******* KIDDING ME?

There's no way the UAE would be stupid enough to attack Canada. Canada would kick their ******* asses!
#5 to #3 - codyxvasco
Reply +64
(11/24/2012) [-]
What are they going to do? Peace them to death?
#6 to #5 - malific
Reply +102
(11/24/2012) [-]
Who the **** do you think has the bear cavalry? Russians? They can't afford that ****.
#259 to #6 - eggoman
Reply 0
(11/24/2012) [-]
Relevant picture evidence
#227 to #6 - thumbsalad
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#54 to #6 - spoonless
Reply +1
(11/24/2012) [-]
I mean they have bears. They just can't afford to outfit them.
#13 to #6 - thesoulless
Reply +81
(11/24/2012) [-]
As if they could even get past our navy.

Pic related
#8 to #6 - thefurie
Reply +27
(11/24/2012) [-]
Why would a russian ride a russian? I mean a Bear on a bear is a little excessive
#55 to #8 - spoonless
Reply +4
(11/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#2 - deadmuerto
Reply +4
(11/23/2012) [-]
AND PROM'S TOMORROW!!!!!!!!!
#1 - anon
Reply 0
(11/23/2012) [-]
OP, go be a faggot somewhere else