Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#407 - mrdavidt
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
the meeting's on my bday.
#402 - mrsadsap **User deleted account**
-7
has deleted their comment [-]
#606 to #402 - milvus
Reply -1
(11/23/2012) [-]
well **** you I hate paying with money
#438 to #402 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Does no one realize that the government has more control of the internet then we realize. Its the reason people go on the deep web.
#433 to #402 - kdiddlid
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
some dumbness just needs applause....
some dumbness just needs applause....
#415 to #402 - thepalmtoptiger
Reply +3
(11/22/2012) [-]
Do you know what they're talking about in that meeting, what their plans are, what laws their delegating?

Me neither, and that's the point. You want to stop piracy, then hey man, I'm all for it. What I don't approve of is backroom meetings, secrecy, and broad laws that could be used to impede on the privacy of the innocent.
#414 to #402 - bangsaidthegun
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Yeah because the government won't take advantage of it and use it however they want. I mean, we can all trust the government, right guiz?
#416 to #414 - mrsadsap **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#426 to #416 - thepalmtoptiger
Reply -3
(11/22/2012) [-]
"law thing"

You don't even know what the **** you're talking about. Eat a dick.
#413 to #402 - zyketor
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#406 to #402 - AlbertEinstein
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
You realize in the end it does more than just shut down piracy sites right?
#410 to #406 - mrsadsap **User deleted account**
-5
has deleted their comment [-]
#421 to #410 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
You expect governements to do something "properly"?

You need to wake up a bit.
#420 to #410 - AlbertEinstein
Reply -2
(11/22/2012) [-]
Problem is, there is no easy way to take them down. Most piracy sites are in different countries and the only way to fight against that is censorship which is bad. If you don't understand the problem with censorship then I feel bad for you.
#404 to #402 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
China disagrees.
#412 to #404 - mrsadsap **User deleted account**
-4
has deleted their comment [-]
#440 to #412 - tigronn
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
you rack diciprine
#418 to #412 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
give it time....
#393 - illegalartist
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
you can take my dignity but youll never take my internets
#390 - aerosol ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
I don't see why the government doesn't take this opportunity to develop better security methods/technology. It could create new jobs. I'm sure it's easier said than done, but it seems like it would be worth a shot.
#389 - streetninja
Reply +5
(11/22/2012) [-]
We all know for a fact that the Government can do what ever the **** they want. The last time S.O.P.A failed the Government still took down Megaupload because they've been waiting to do it for some time but even though S.O.P.A didn't pass the vote they still took it down anyway.    
   
The only reason S.O.P.A exists is so that the Government have a reason to take down websites they don't like.
We all know for a fact that the Government can do what ever the **** they want. The last time S.O.P.A failed the Government still took down Megaupload because they've been waiting to do it for some time but even though S.O.P.A didn't pass the vote they still took it down anyway.

The only reason S.O.P.A exists is so that the Government have a reason to take down websites they don't like.
#395 to #389 - rhinoplasty
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
the government couldnt give a **** about the internet so long as classified files are never spread around its the suffering entertainment industry that keeps nagging them into things like this. you americans have a bad habbit of blaming your government for everything
#424 to #395 - thepalmtoptiger
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Except the US government is owned by the media. There's a direct correlation between elected officials and the amount sold to their campaign by the mass media. If you don't believe me then look at literally any news stations. Each news station has an agenda, and they indoctrinate the public in to either voting Democrat or Republican, and anyone who has an opposing view is labeled as an extremist, terrorist, or an otherwise derogatory term.
#429 to #424 - rhinoplasty
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
i dont understand how you guys only have a 2 party system in such a big country
#439 to #429 - mexikaner
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#401 to #395 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Good job embarrassing yourself with your bias.
#399 to #395 - streetninja
Reply +2
(11/22/2012) [-]
I'm not American.
#403 to #399 - rhinoplasty
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
darn i was taking a shot in the dark with that one
#405 to #403 - streetninja
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
No worries mate. It was only a guess.
#381 - tredbear
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
why did this person delete their account?
#387 to #381 - blahdudeblah
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
cause they weren't being a thumbwhore.
#386 to #381 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
its so people wont think there just another thumbwhore
#400 to #386 - tredbear
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
hey anon, i bet you are the one who posted this.
#384 to #381 - davvi
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
so people don't thumb him down because they think hes a thumbwhore
#385 to #384 - tredbear
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
ahh
#379 - sumerz
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#376 - thekermitfrog
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
**thekermitfrog rolled a random image posted in comment #1760901 at MLP Brony Board ** What the internet thinks of this
#371 - captainrattrap ONLINE
Reply -3
(11/22/2012) [-]
As much as I don't want the government to touch my internet... I don't want to see Google control it either... **** dat ****.
#382 to #371 - dehfurk
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Of anyone, EVER, I want Google to control my internet. Hell, when Google Internet goes national, Google can just shut up and take my money. They have all my search history, they already own my internet.
#396 to #382 - iaminfactawizard
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
So Google, if they wanted to, could go through their archives and figure out what your fetish is, who you fap to, and when you fap.

they know.
#388 to #382 - captainrattrap ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
It would honestly end up with a distopian society situation with Google monitoring us and the govt having access to it since we don't have written rights to internet privacy.
#369 - venilly
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
haha yep it it was clear they would bring it back   
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV_asbVevF0
haha yep it it was clear they would bring it back
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV_asbVevF0
#366 - allgoodinthehood
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#365 - justbeingcool
Reply +5
(11/22/2012) [-]
**justbeingcool rolled a random image posted in comment #26 at Bibere pls ** the internet
#363 - palindromia ONLINE
Reply +6
(11/22/2012) [-]
I'm gonna get red thumbs for this, but such bills are too absurd to be passed when brought to the attention of the general public. Therefore, these "bills" serve as perfect distractions for bills that are far more absurd. Beside that, it doesn't matter what you think or vote for. The political lobbyists and corporations that control this nation, which has slipped into corporatism almost entirely, will go with whatever the **** they want regardless of what you think. It's just better to implement ******** like this as a distraction to prevent a public uproar.
#417 to #363 - padrerebelscumole
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Right thinking there.Thinking about this , maybe is because of the mess in Gaza.Man they think we are so idiots.Reminds me of that picture of 4 People's Magazine covers where 3 of them showed something about a mess that was going on in middle east and the american cover was showing something else , more possitive to say like.And at the bottom said :
Don't you know we have internet?
#397 to #363 - illegalartist
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
dead on about the lobbyists and corporations that pay them but that doesn't mean we have to bend over and let them give it to us in the ass.
#368 to #363 - ruebezahl
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Which bills? SOPA? That meeting in December has nothing whatsoever to do with SOPA. I have no idea where OP got that idea.
#378 to #368 - mrsirandsir
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
I'm fairly certain OP meant what kind of "internet regulation" would happen at this meeting, and SOPA is the most relatable bill.
#356 - casadue
Reply +15
(11/22/2012) [-]
And still black men are the evil guys
#352 - ruebezahl
Reply +9
(11/22/2012) [-]
Ah yes, Google... protector of the free Internet... willing collaborator of the FBI when Gmail account data is needed to figure out if the CIA director is cheating on his wife....

No, of course that is not a contradiction. Google is a protector of a free Internet... when business issues are at stake for Google.

I wonder how many of the people who sign that Google petition actually know what that "closed-door meeting in December" is about (which actually isn't really a closed-door meeting as Google lies...er...claims - in fact, four Google representatives are going to participate in that meeting) . Because Google sure as hell doesn't tell you that on their website. They just expect you to get all upset and sign the damn petition. Facts? Information? None of that to be had from Google. Just some emotional video and some half-truths. And then they complain about secretive governments.

You don't have to trust your government - in fact, you shouldn't, but trusting a corporation is a million times more stupid.
#408 to #352 - padrerebelscumole
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
gouglie(misspelled that in purpuse) is been a pretty good ally in this corp fight over the internet all these years , aside the talks about monitoring infomation etc.
Take a minute and think for a second.This corp you talk about is led by computer experts who use the internet.Even the chiefs in command are young and pretty sure they use internet , facebook , etc..You think that if this that you imply would be in effect wouldn't there be strikes of this corp's personel ? Wouldn't there be e-mail's about that on the internet? That this corp is actully pretty bad , and is not what it say it is? And about this meeting you think that this big internet corp that says is pro free internet would not want to be a part of it just to see what they will talk about and prove the wrong?What do you think the world is run by ? Monkeys?Come on?Grow up and don't repeat the talk's of previous year's so called internet gurus on youtube.You dont want to be a part of this corp's job.Fine by me, but dont go to this corp's search engine or video provider and talk bad about it in chat areas.Thats 2faced man.Its a psychosis.
#351 - anon
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Obama will never sign onto something like this, right guize? Right?
#391 to #351 - fivewordminimum **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#398 to #391 - emmiepony
Reply -1
(11/22/2012) [-]
i hue'd. kill yourself.
#349 - potatoace
Reply +2
(11/22/2012) [-]
To hell with freedom and everything </3
#348 - scumbagposter
Reply +14
(11/22/2012) [-]
Here in Egypt they are closing porn sites
Here in Egypt they are closing porn sites
#394 to #348 - aerosol ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
My condolences to you and your country.
My condolences to you and your country.
#362 to #348 - jjvoodoo
Reply +6
(11/22/2012) [-]
what?
what?
#359 to #348 - ruebezahl
Reply +3
(11/22/2012) [-]
Well, if the people elect a religiously conservative president, then apparently, that is what the people want.

Sorry to say it, but it looks like a majority of the people in Egypt made a more or less conscious decision to **** up the revolution for those of you who wanted to live in a free and democratic society.
#610 to #359 - scumbagposter
Reply 0
(11/23/2012) [-]
The decision to close them was taken before the elections
#367 to #359 - linkofreekthree
Reply -3
(11/22/2012) [-]
shut up you jew
#343 - fencingchamp
Reply +2
(11/22/2012) [-]
does this mean i cant have my nasty ass porn?
#364 to #343 - ruebezahl
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
Depends. Are you American? Nothing whatsoever would change for any American based on the proposals being discussed at that meeting Google is referring to.

The main proposal that is being discussed is that control of certain aspects of the Internet is to be moved from the American government to an international organization. But the American government can still allow you whatever they allow you now, and they can still wiretap your house as they see fit. So no changes for you whatsoever.
#347 to #343 - katypower
Reply 0
(11/22/2012) [-]
Probably you can. But the second you make a reference from the movie, LAWSUIT!!!!
#340 - quackimawhale
Reply +1
(11/22/2012) [-]
it would make sense that google would want to keep the internet open. you know, so they can take more of our private information and stuff.