Anonymous comments allowed.
#79 - frysfrys (11/09/2012) [-]
I'm gay and bitches look at me like I have two ******* heads, just because I'm republican. It's great and all(not really) that Obama supports gay rights, but the fact that he supports gay rights is irrelevant to what he's suppose to be doing. He hasn't even done what he promised 4 years ago. And people blame the Republicans for "dumping" the economy on that ******** lap. It all started with Clinton, a ******* democrat. Now would you look at that...
User avatar #88 to #79 - wtfareu (11/09/2012) [-]
Clinton actually saved our ass
User avatar #83 to #79 - gagster (11/09/2012) [-]
You remind me of my Uncle.His name was Tom.
#84 to #83 - frysfrys (11/09/2012) [-]
>His name was Tom   
>His name was   
>name was   
He died, didn't he?
>His name was Tom
>His name was
>name was

He died, didn't he?
User avatar #100 to #84 - jlyoung (11/09/2012) [-]
He's calling you an Uncle Tom. You know,like a black person who's overly sympathetic to white people.
User avatar #85 to #84 - gagster (11/09/2012) [-]
He died before the 20th century.
#77 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
Obama is AGAINST Pot you moron.

The feds want it gone and Obama backs the feds and has openly.

Wake the **** up you hipster mother ******* .
User avatar #109 to #77 - justinsane (11/09/2012) [-]
Umm....hes given implicit consent on it several times. He even admitted to smoking in high school and college
#150 to #109 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
And then he admitted he regretted doing it. Seriously, where do people come up with this garbage?
#73 - infinitereaper (11/09/2012) [-]
Everybody is sucking Obama dick   
And I'm just sitting here, realizing the country is no better off   
and masturbating.
Everybody is sucking Obama dick

And I'm just sitting here, realizing the country is no better off

and masturbating.
#89 to #73 - dirigiblequixote (11/09/2012) [-]
. . . to people sucking Obama dick?
User avatar #71 - yomawder (11/09/2012) [-]
Hmm. I guess the only way I could react to this picture is...

User avatar #69 - CobraStrike (11/09/2012) [-]
Coloradofags report in

User avatar #87 to #69 - sonicg ONLINE (11/09/2012) [-]
Unfortunately, yep. Way up north near Greeley.
User avatar #76 to #69 - epicfailguysbuddy (11/09/2012) [-]
Reporting in from Parker, CO the mountains today were hazy as **** and there was a fire that started but cause was unknown.
#67 - timerce (11/09/2012) [-]
well except the obama kim jongistration had nothing to do with the legalization of weed, have been raiding legal dispensaries for the past 4 years. also you left off 4 more years of drones strike, indefinite detention, more wars in africa and the middle east, and a longer war on whistle blowers
User avatar #72 to #67 - corneth (11/09/2012) [-]
yeah, the Kim jong Il comparison completely Nullifies any point you may have otherwise made
#75 to #72 - timerce (11/09/2012) [-]
actually i didnt do it, the word a-d-m-i-n-s-t-r-a-t-i-o-n was autochanged nice try though
#66 - mattymc (11/09/2012) [-]
I want to hug an eagle
#63 - Aejax (11/09/2012) [-]
We're fighting a war we can't afford, Iran's trolling the world, and our economy is falling right out of the sky

User avatar #62 - liamdurf (11/09/2012) [-]
gay rights, women's rights and this bald eagle ************ . And some weed who?
User avatar #65 to #62 - CobraStrike (11/09/2012) [-]
It took me a bit to understand what the **** you were doing, and I have to say, it might not work out for you.
#57 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
gay rights? Legal weed? Don't recall him doing either of those things his first four years. What makes you think he'll do them now? Also, the two states that have established these already did it of their own accord. And what exactly does he mean by Women's Rights? Are we going to legalize women and let them marry or something?

One last thing. He didn't kill Osama. A Navy Seal did.
#163 to #57 - spacelubber (11/09/2012) [-]
Hold on... We hold Kennedy responsible for the Boy of Pigs Invasion failure. Why is it suddenly wrong to allow the leader to take responsibility when something good happens?
User avatar #112 to #57 - bgbba (11/09/2012) [-]
Well, in regards to the gay rights, he simply didn't enforce the dreaded DOMA. So he did actually do something, but not doing anything, if that makes sense. As for the weed thing, I cannot stand his continued support of the drug was. That's one thing that I REALLY dislike about his policies.
User avatar #114 to #112 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
It boggles my mind how people give him credit for absolutely everything. I wasn't in favor of Health Care Reform, but at least he tried to push it through. Well, he tired, then gave up, and hasn't done anything with it since.

He hasn't shown any inkling of interest in giving gays rights. He never said anything about legalizing weed. I didn't agree with Romney on a lot of social issues, but it didn't seem like we were getting them from Obama, either.
User avatar #206 to #114 - bgbba (11/09/2012) [-]
Oh I agree about the weed, absolutely. In regards to gay marriage, it seems to be happening without federal help. Frankly, if it goes state by state then we don't have the eternal butthurt from the states that didn't want it in the first place. If you ask me, everything social should be state by state. The government should only guarentee basic liberties, such as civil rights. One could argue that gay marriage is a civil right, which I would agree with, but I'd rather that my state have it and the one that doesn't want it don't, that way there's less resentment. And yes, I support gay marriage all the way. It is true though that Obama has backed out on many promises like the drug war, and that pisses me off.
#104 to #57 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
Hitler didn't kill the Jews. The Nazis did.
#74 to #57 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
All of this.

I never understood how people claim Obama gave gays rights. He's not a state legislator.
#60 to #57 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
Romney was kind of against women, but it's not like he would have sent them to concentration camps or some **** .
But Obama DID give the orders for the raid on Osama's mansion. You have to admit he made a good choice.
#70 to #60 - timerce (11/09/2012) [-]
he also gave the order to kill a 16 year old american citizen with a drone just because he had the wrong dad though there was no evidence of the son ever doing anything wrong
#78 to #70 - knuckleheaded (11/09/2012) [-]
source or it didn't happen.
#80 to #78 - timerce (11/09/2012) [-]
google Abdulrahman al-Awlaki and research it for your self. dont try the argument "well his dad is a terrorist" because we let the bin laden family off for what their son/brother did
#97 to #80 - knuckleheaded (11/09/2012) [-]
1. Don't assume what arguments I plan on using, it's unbecoming of you.
2. Two officials stated that the intended target was Ibrahim al-Banna, the supposed senior operative in the Arabian Peninsula.
Seems like you might've benefited from some research yourself. I'll concede that some unmentioned officials tried to pawn him off as in his mid 20's, but if you want to sit there and claim it was a deliberate strike, go ahead. I'll just sit here without a tin foil hat.
User avatar #68 to #60 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
I don't see how Romney was against women. In fact, I think he got more of their vote than Obama. That's not to say I liked Romney as a politican.

Also, I don't like how everyone gives Obama full credit. Yes, it was a smart move, but there were years of searching and intelligence-gathering before he was even in office. They make it sound like he did everything on his own.
#58 to #57 - lolollo (11/09/2012) [-]
Beeeeeecause they just happened you sheltered ignoramus?
User avatar #59 to #58 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
I'd reread my comment if I were you.
User avatar #61 to #59 - lolollo (11/09/2012) [-]
So you contradicted yourself.

#64 to #61 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
Are young going to make a point and have a discussion with me, or just try to point out flaws that aren't there? I said " the two states that have established these already did it of their own accord."

1) Meaning yes, I know they just happened.
2) It's not a contradiction, I'm saying THEY DID IT THEMSELVES.
User avatar #197 to #64 - lolollo (11/09/2012) [-]
Then what was the point of you saying "What makes you think he'll do them now?" when a) the "them" in question were already done, and b) you were just going to admit that later on in the comment?
User avatar #198 to #197 - captainwow (11/09/2012) [-]
Yeah I'm not gonna even bother reading whatever dribble you're writing this time.
User avatar #199 to #198 - lolollo (11/09/2012) [-]
So you don't even know. At least admit it when you say **** you don't mean to say.
User avatar #55 - erikwarmblood (11/09/2012) [-]
so sick of political crap. glad the head negro won tho.
User avatar #54 - dementedllama (11/09/2012) [-]
This election changed absolutely nothing.
User avatar #52 - smokinhigh (11/09/2012) [-]
sold in the weed part
User avatar #47 - duudegladiator (11/09/2012) [-]
If he showed up at my door, i'd welcome him in, give him some spiked tea, and then shoot him.
#45 - xmegustax (11/09/2012) [-]
Knock Knock-Who's There?

Worthless stoners, increased gas prices, ****** economy, and no jobs
User avatar #81 to #45 - smellyboner (11/09/2012) [-]
yes increased gas prices are the presidents fault
User avatar #91 to #81 - wtfareu (11/09/2012) [-]
there's a tax on it so the government does control it just not the president
User avatar #107 to #91 - hazardpay ONLINE (11/09/2012) [-]
Or it's just supply and demand, or if what you say is true then when did the president control the government? i believe its the other way around, to an extent at least
User avatar #115 to #107 - wtfareu (11/09/2012) [-]
it is partially supply and demand but the government still makes a lot money
User avatar #92 to #91 - smellyboner (11/09/2012) [-]
yeah the tax is a few cents. you do know we import most of our oil right..
User avatar #95 to #93 - smellyboner (11/09/2012) [-]
so you think it's a good idea to lower prices on a non renewable source of energy?
User avatar #106 to #95 - wtfareu (11/09/2012) [-]
I think its good to keep it low so people can afford more in general however that could also lead to a gas crisis both points have ups and downs
User avatar #43 - Aleafe (11/09/2012) [-]
as if there was an actual issue with womens rights
User avatar #31 - smeedwoker (11/08/2012) [-]
"Women's rights has a direct correlation to terrorism"

#35 to #31 - adambubba (11/08/2012) [-]
"random quotation"

-you should believe me because everything on the internet is true
#146 to #35 - anon (11/09/2012) [-]
missed the joke son, flew right by ya
User avatar #27 - roliga (11/08/2012) [-]
>implying Obama decides on gay rights
User avatar #22 - lilnuggetbob (11/08/2012) [-]
Obama ruined the economy, now i wait for red thumbs.
#49 to #22 - elgringogordo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #36 to #22 - darthtomale ONLINE (11/08/2012) [-]
the economy is not yet in a state of ruin. it is not affected by any one man. the current and past recession is the cause of years of political policy and business ethics that were irresponsible.
User avatar #38 to #36 - lilnuggetbob (11/08/2012) [-]
I understand what you mean, but Obama can effect the economy by adding laws, and such.
User avatar #39 to #38 - darthtomale ONLINE (11/09/2012) [-]
he can only take action that is approved by the other branches of government. and seeing as they hated him for most of his presidency and theyve been taking a 5 month break it doesnt seem like he or anyone else can do jack **** about the economy or anything else
User avatar #40 to #39 - lilnuggetbob (11/09/2012) [-]
He can play a large role in it, some things he passes can subliminal effect the economy, welfare, and higher taxes can cause some company to go bankrupt, and other to lay off people, and some people will quit just so they can get welfare.
User avatar #56 to #40 - bigballamike (11/09/2012) [-]
I don't want to start a huge debate, just would like to point out that the economy is largely affected by current trends, including a president and his policies. The stock market is directly correlated to the economy as a whole. As such, the stock market is a good indicator of how the American and global economies are doing. If no one saw, the stock market dropped a stunning 313 points on Wednesday after the election, and another 121 today. That should be a fair point to show that businesses within America don't trust their money in the system during current economic situation, which apparently plunged after President Obama won re-election. That should show that the President's financial policies aren't beneficial to the current US economy.

The stock market shows how the economy is, and it has been plunging over the past 4 years, and dipped a lot after the election. It has been in recession levels ever since the current president has been in office. So... the economy isn't great and it is affected by the president.
#33 to #22 - anon (11/08/2012) [-]
1) If the guy you like is running a ****** Economy, blame the previous guy and say the current guy didn't have enough time to change everything.
2) If after 2 terms the economy still sucks, blame the previous guy again.
3) Don't post anything specific.
a) NO talking about Debt or Regulations.
b) NO talks about who controlled the senate or the house during periods in time.

Remember, only post <This guy> is the problem, and leave it at that. If anyone does try to engage in an intelligent debate, ignore their point and talk about racism or some **** .
User avatar #24 to #22 - duvallwhitey (11/08/2012) [-]
Bush did.
User avatar #46 to #24 - jonfootpenis (11/09/2012) [-]
obama raised more debt in 4 years than bush did in 8 and bush was supporting a war so dont blame in on bush.
User avatar #29 to #24 - lilnuggetbob (11/08/2012) [-]
Yes and obama didnt do anything, also this pic is to wrong.
1: gays already have all the rights that a strait person has.
2: women accualy have more rights than a man
User avatar #34 to #29 - lilnuggetbob (11/08/2012) [-]
Also weed is only gonna boost unemployment in the states that it is legal
#28 to #24 - tinyfive (11/08/2012) [-]
didn't know that the president declares war or make laws. thanks for the lesson tho
 Friends (0)