Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#581 - ratherfastblackman **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
**ratherfastblackman rolls 270**
#579 - FirstSrMeme
Reply +15
(08/20/2012) [-]
I don't understand this....
When there is a liberal bashing post
>tons of comments in support of liberals with many thumbs
When there is a conservative bashing post
>tons of comments in support of conservatives with many thumbs

same deal with atheism/Christianity
da **** is happening
#588 to #579 - funmanigro
Reply +8
(08/20/2012) [-]
such is life on the internet
such is life on the internet
#582 to #579 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Except when a christian speaks out to defend himself he only gets hate, but when athiests are douchebags and hypocrites "Omg lol, you so funny!"
#578 - ilynchnigs
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
**ilynchnigs rolled a random image posted in comment #113 at oh god ** i didnt like it OP, nothing against you, good comic, just didnt like it
**ilynchnigs rolled a random image posted in comment #113 at oh god ** i didnt like it OP, nothing against you, good comic, just didnt like it
#574 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
The college liberal meme is funny because colleges are actually populated with people like that. As far as I know, there's only one Glenn Beck and he's not even on the air anymore. Forced meme is forced.
#570 - diggitydiggitydalt
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
I have never heard of a right wing politician or political talk radio/show host have views like the majority of these in this meme.
#576 to #570 - buttgauges
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Yeah, because OP is taking the viewpoints from right-wing RADICALS. You can do the same thing with both parties to make them look like fools.
#569 - HARMONYHARMONY
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
I liked the liberal meme better. Not all conservatives are Glenn Beck.
#587 to #569 - pokershark **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#568 - hermancain
Reply +9
(08/20/2012) [-]
As the late, great Tupac Shakur once said:
**** y'all, I'm Herman Cain
#549 - joemeister
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
I may be a conservative. But at least I know how to spell "aren't"
#565 to #549 - buttgauges
Reply +4
(08/20/2012) [-]
No no, us conservatives are complete idiots.
You don't know how to spell aren't, you lying religious nut.
#566 to #565 - joemeister
Reply -6
(08/20/2012) [-]
you just declared ******* war on conservatism when you're a conservative. ******* traitor cunt.
#572 to #566 - buttgauges
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
Oh please, some faget ass liberal would have come by and said it for srs anyway. You can't be a conservative on FJ and not be able to handle slams against you.
#573 to #572 - joemeister
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
you can't be a conservative anywhere and expect not to be slammed.
#575 to #573 - buttgauges
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
True dat.
#548 - thebacondroid
Reply +3
(08/20/2012) [-]
I like this meme
#546 - loulougia
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
Yes.
Thank you.
Fj is able to have a too side argument.
#543 - OMGINBD
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
**OMGINBD rolled a random image posted in comment #51 at I LOVED THAT GAME! **
#542 - jibb
Reply +5
(08/20/2012) [-]
To americans:

I apologize on behalf of the sane part of Europe. Not everyone hates you.
This post made me cry a little inside, it is just so ******* bad.
#551 to #542 - oxan
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
You're a ******* idiot.

It's a stereotypical view on US conservatives who, for the most part, ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS ****. Of course some are exaggerated, it's an image trying to get a laugh. There's liberal ones as well.

Jesus ******* Christ, I can't tell you enough how much I hate you.
#577 to #551 - buttgauges
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
SOME are exaggerated?
There's a reason OP put "radical" in the title.

You can do the same thing for liberal radicals to make them look just as foolish.
#580 to #577 - oxan
Reply -2
(08/20/2012) [-]
I don't really think criminalising marijuana is a radical view. Small things like that kept me from saying all are exaggerated.

To your latter point, that's what I was trying to explain to jibb. He's clearly too focused on being an apologetic douche.
#764 to #580 - apologetic
Reply 0
(08/21/2012) [-]
Don't mention me in that

I in no way agree with your post
#766 to #764 - oxan
Reply +1
(08/21/2012) [-]
So criminalising marijuana - a substance that has both benefits and cons - is a radical view? That would mean legalising it is also radical.

Sigh, stoners...
#585 to #580 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
You're a ******* idiot...lol
#642 to #585 - oxan
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
And what do you base that on, Anon? As I said earlier, opinions are meant to have some justification.

If it's the marijuana comment, I hope you understand that I never said I was against legalisation. I simply believe that wanting it banned isn't radical; it's a reasonable opinion.
#557 to #551 - jibb
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Oh noes. Someone has another opinion.

I hates him, he deserve to die!!!11!!!!1
#558 to #557 - oxan
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Opinions are meant to have some justification. You're just saying stupid ****.
#541 - cdroid
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
**** me.
"makes a 'conservative' meme
assumes all conservatives are Christian"
#554 to #541 - oxan
Reply +3
(08/20/2012) [-]
It's stereotypical like every other image macro.

The liberal meme suggests that all liberals support gun control. It's just exaggerated stereotypes, for tits' sake.
#762 to #554 - cdroid
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
5/8 meme's were about Christians, not conservatives. Come on now.
#765 to #762 - oxan
Reply 0
(08/21/2012) [-]
>Stereotypical

Not all liberals are atheists. Just let it go, bro... let it go...
#539 - endriii
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
Finally someone who is not a bias pretentious elitist on funnyjunk and makes fun of both extreme sides.

Thumbs for you on both content.
#535 - walkingdisaster
Reply +8
(08/20/2012) [-]
#537 to #535 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Please stop spamming. Yes, I'm commenting as an anon because I don't want to bother arguing with someone who's posted about 30 comments on this page. (clearly you have too much time on your hands)
#540 to #537 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Spamming? I'm contributing to the meme which probably won't come around again, so this will be the only time I get to use them. Spamming would be if I went and posted these on the top post 50 times. And since you're anoning to avoid the possibility of red thumbs, I will do the same.
#530 - kalvinrulez
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#522 - walkingdisaster
Reply +17
(08/20/2012) [-]
I've noticed whenever there's a political post, the number of Anons sky rocket.
#531 to #522 - I Am Monkey
Reply +5
(08/20/2012) [-]
Nobody wants to get sucked into the **** storm. Political commenters on this site are as sane as they are informed. (they are neither)
#506 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
I laughed at the first half, the second half were a bit lackluster.

*scrolls down, scrolls back up*

holy ****, my comment is the only one that isnt about politics!
#505 - Hawke
Reply +11
(08/20/2012) [-]
Capitalism: Unequal distribution of wealth

Socialism: Equal distribution of poverty
#556 to #505 - oxan
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
>this is what lolbertarians actually believe

Whatever you say, bro.
#532 to #505 - I Am Monkey
Reply +15
(08/20/2012) [-]
It is the role of the government to guarantee equal opportunity, not equal results.
#604 to #532 - vortexrain
Reply -2
(08/20/2012) [-]
You just summed up American Capitalism.
#534 to #532 - swagbot
Reply +4
(08/20/2012) [-]
Yes! This cannot be said enough!!
#516 to #505 - creosote
Reply +3
(08/20/2012) [-]
As you can see, there is a narrow but existent gap between the two... Finding that gap is rather difficult, though...
#493 - walkingdisaster
Reply +7
(08/20/2012) [-]
#508 to #493 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Except a birth certificate is required by US law to hold office, whereas releasing your entire life's worth of tax returns is not and hasn't been asked or required before.
Inb4 "others haven't been asked for their certificates either", others haven't been raised in Kenya with nobody but their immediate family to vouch for their existence.
#523 to #508 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
and obama did release his birth certificate

and they kind of check to see the birth certificate, the whole ******* world didnt "need" to see it.
#544 to #523 - buttgauges
Reply -2
(08/20/2012) [-]
You're right, he did.



How long did it take him to do that again?
#545 to #544 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
how long does it take to fake a birth certificate?

that long
#547 to #545 - buttgauges
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
precisely.
#550 to #547 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
just checking, are we being serious
#552 to #550 - buttgauges
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
You tell me
#553 to #552 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
personally, I'm not
#555 to #553 - buttgauges
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
Funny, cause I'm not.
I find the fact that it took him THAT long to present a birth certificate rather suspicious. If, say, ROMNEY took that long to show his birth certificate the democrats would be up his ass for it.

But he's Obama, we all love him because he's black.
#560 to #555 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
I say that if we can let someone get to be president without knowing where they are born, we have bigger problems with national security.
#561 to #560 - buttgauges
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
But before he was elected... we didn't know. Why do you think there was a **** storm?
#571 to #561 - srskate
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
I'd wager smeone does a check before you can run for president. I've said before, I'm not one for politics, but you do have a point there.
#536 to #523 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
It's fairly obvious why Romney wouldn't want to release his returns. A lot of people that don't know what they're talking about think he's hiding criminal activity, which is retarded considering that it's already visible to the IRS and would show up in his criminal record if he had done so. The real reason is that it's going to show that he is in fact rich (surprise!), but this will give Obama a fresh opportunity to crucify him for it. (since his last push to demonize him for being rich fizzled out)
#538 to #536 - srskate
Reply +1
(08/20/2012) [-]
I'm honestly not one for politics, but i think with enough distraction/campaigning they could easily defuse the whole "rich" thing. I doubt i'd abstain from voting for someone simply because they are rich.
#513 to #508 - walkingdisaster
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Yea, no one has ever asked for a political opponent to relapse tax returns Except for when Romney asked Kennedy to release his tax returns.
#524 to #513 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Not his entire life's worth. You're required to release 2 years worth and that's what he did.
#528 to #524 - walkingdisaster
Reply 0
(08/20/2012) [-]
Everyone seems to be saying a different year number, but the most common I hear is 10. I've never heard someone ask for his entire life worth. Please show me where that happened.
#494 to #493 - walkingdisaster
Reply -4
(08/20/2012) [-]
#521 to #494 - sketchE
Reply -1
(08/20/2012) [-]
actually it is 75 percent of all green house gases is just water vapor
#496 to #494 - walkingdisaster
Reply -2
(08/20/2012) [-]
#502 to #496 - srskate
Reply +2
(08/20/2012) [-]
i like em :D
#499 to #496 - walkingdisaster
Reply +4
(08/20/2012) [-]
Figured if we're going to make fun of the right wing nuts, might as well, you know, make fun of the right wing nuts and not just make them seem like religious nuts.