Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#157 - justtapout (08/17/2012) [-]
MFW
MFW
#152 - anonymous (08/17/2012) [-]
imagine if the bankers bailout went to the scientists.
imagine if the bankers bailout went to the scientists.
#149 - cindertech (08/17/2012) [-]
The first thing that I noticed was a bubble in the corner saying how to get subtitles in English.... He's speaking English in the video... ******* racist
#155 to #149 - anonymous (08/17/2012) [-]
are those... subtitles!?
#148 - itsthatoneguy (08/17/2012) [-]
pretty sweet
User avatar #134 - mrgoodbunny (08/17/2012) [-]
Finally, we can see Usain Bolt in action.
User avatar #131 - trixxx (08/17/2012) [-]
Can shoot in a trillion of a frame, video is only in 420p
User avatar #139 to #131 - cyberdeath (08/17/2012) [-]
Higher the frame rate, lower the quality. If you get a regular Slow-mo Camera, 1,000,000 frames is ****
User avatar #170 to #139 - ultrarobbie (08/17/2012) [-]
Depends on the camera though :U
0
#130 - pokaymahn has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #129 - iamnits (08/17/2012) [-]
I lost it when he said a superhero that can see around corners.
#128 - HARMONYHARMONY (08/17/2012) [-]
The one thing this camera fails to account for is who, exactly, was phone?
The one thing this camera fails to account for is who, exactly, was phone?
#123 - lefish (08/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#162 to #161 - lefish (08/17/2012) [-]
*right click > save image*
*right click > save image*
#121 - FillupMiCrevis (08/17/2012) [-]
So it can actually track light and we can watch light move in slow machine... That's cool.

But can it see why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
#182 to #121 - perfectionx ONLINE (08/17/2012) [-]
Step1: Take highest rated comment
Step2: Copy it
Step3: Insert stupid misspelling of a word
Step 4: Acquire thumbs
User avatar #120 - hahafunnyuwhore (08/17/2012) [-]
well, didn't think it was possible, but humans have finaly made something faster than the speed of light.
User avatar #140 to #120 - jadeziaa (08/17/2012) [-]
He says in the video it's nearly the speed of light.
User avatar #143 to #140 - jadeziaa (08/17/2012) [-]
At 9:36, to be exact.
#122 to #120 - FillupMiCrevis (08/17/2012) [-]
It's not faster than the speed of light. If it was faster than the speed of light, wouldn't it technically be going into the past?


Don't kill me if I'm wrong, I have a VERY poor understand of science.
User avatar #154 to #122 - malhaloc (08/17/2012) [-]
Faster than the speed of light just means that it would move so fast it would reach its destination before you actually saw it get there. Not sure what that would mean for a camera though.
#118 - bigmanslims (08/17/2012) [-]
That was the coolest thing I've seen in awhile
User avatar #142 to #117 - meagainz (08/17/2012) [-]
***** its worth the watch
#238 to #142 - redthumb (08/19/2012) [-]
MFW I watched it
#116 - collliiinnnn (08/17/2012) [-]
wow
wow
User avatar #113 - madmario (08/17/2012) [-]
blackops 2 scope lets u see around corners. New camera sees around corners. only thing i could think about when i saw this. probably need to start doing something more productive with my life
#112 - ICEDgrunge (08/17/2012) [-]
This is amazing. I won't lie when I say I had a hard time fathoming what was going on at every second.
User avatar #111 - shadowstepone (08/17/2012) [-]
there's a single problem with this camera. no matter how impressive it may be, it is still not totally accurate. it is, after all, a composite video of many different attempts of the same thing. as far as current science can tell, there is no such thing as a truly blank environment. any experiment will have minuscule differences between the tests. therefore, they will not be taking a truly accurate picture, as each beam of light would react slightly differently.
0
#203 to #111 - jgk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#192 to #111 - anonymous (08/17/2012) [-]
Don't be that guy
#150 to #111 - afluffycupcake (08/17/2012) [-]
every thing as a problem when it is first invented. phones were never perfect at first, they still arent. the first cellphone only had a half hour of talk time out of every recharge and it weighed over 2 pounds. the first computer took up an entire room. and back then both completely revolutionary. But with years passing and continuing research and innovations, we have phones and computers that can do so much more and are so much more compact. the same will happen with this camera. its the first edition. in 5, 10, maybe 20 years, theyll be able to improve the quality of the pictures taken to make them more accurate.
User avatar #158 to #150 - shadowstepone (08/17/2012) [-]
true, but it is physically impossible to film faster than light in one shot. this will improve, but unless the laws of physics change so that the universe doesn't have a speed limit, this camera is doomed to be an imperfect technology.
User avatar #127 to #111 - zigzagderpaderp (08/17/2012) [-]
lol wut
#124 to #111 - anonymous (08/17/2012) [-]
You realize that with the rate technology is currently developing that those sorts of issues can be resolved perhaps even within this generation?
 Friends (0)