Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#157 - justtapout
Reply +7
(08/17/2012) [-]
MFW
MFW
#152 - anon
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
imagine if the bankers bailout went to the scientists.
imagine if the bankers bailout went to the scientists.
#159 to #152 - koalafication
Reply +5
(08/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#149 - cindertech
Reply -5
(08/17/2012) [-]
The first thing that I noticed was a bubble in the corner saying how to get subtitles in English.... He's speaking English in the video... ******* racist
#155 to #149 - anon
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
are those... subtitles!?
#148 - itsthatoneguy
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
pretty sweet
#137 - theduder
Reply +25
(08/17/2012) [-]
#134 - mrgoodbunny
Reply +15
(08/17/2012) [-]
Finally, we can see Usain Bolt in action.
#131 - trixxx
Reply +21
(08/17/2012) [-]
Can shoot in a trillion of a frame, video is only in 420p
#139 to #131 - cyberdeath
Reply +4
(08/17/2012) [-]
Higher the frame rate, lower the quality. If you get a regular Slow-mo Camera, 1,000,000 frames is ****
#170 to #139 - ultrarobbie
Reply -1
(08/17/2012) [-]
Depends on the camera though :U
#130 - pokaymahn
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#129 - iamnits
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
I lost it when he said a superhero that can see around corners.
#128 - HARMONYHARMONY
Reply +2
(08/17/2012) [-]
The one thing this camera fails to account for is who, exactly, was phone?
The one thing this camera fails to account for is who, exactly, was phone?
#123 - lefish
Reply +10
(08/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#161 to #123 - bikehole
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#162 to #161 - lefish
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
*right click > save image*
*right click > save image*
#121 - FillupMiCrevis
Reply +27
(08/17/2012) [-]
So it can actually track light and we can watch light move in slow machine... That's cool.

But can it see why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
#182 to #121 - perfectionx
Reply +14
(08/17/2012) [-]
Step1: Take highest rated comment
Step2: Copy it
Step3: Insert stupid misspelling of a word
Step 4: Acquire thumbs
#120 - hahafunnyuwhore
Reply -6
(08/17/2012) [-]
well, didn't think it was possible, but humans have finaly made something faster than the speed of light.
#140 to #120 - jadeziaa
Reply +1
(08/17/2012) [-]
He says in the video it's nearly the speed of light.
#143 to #140 - jadeziaa
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
At 9:36, to be exact.
#122 to #120 - FillupMiCrevis
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
It's not faster than the speed of light. If it was faster than the speed of light, wouldn't it technically be going into the past?


Don't kill me if I'm wrong, I have a VERY poor understand of science.
#154 to #122 - malhaloc
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
Faster than the speed of light just means that it would move so fast it would reach its destination before you actually saw it get there. Not sure what that would mean for a camera though.
#118 - bigmanslims
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
That was the coolest thing I've seen in awhile
#117 - redthumb
Reply -9
(08/17/2012) [-]
#142 to #117 - meagainz
Reply +2
(08/17/2012) [-]
***** its worth the watch
#238 to #142 - redthumb
Reply 0
(08/19/2012) [-]
MFW I watched it
#116 - collliiinnnn
Reply +3
(08/17/2012) [-]
wow
wow
#114 - tokenblaqguy
Reply +11
(08/17/2012) [-]
**** yo camera *****
#113 - madmario
Reply -4
(08/17/2012) [-]
blackops 2 scope lets u see around corners. New camera sees around corners. only thing i could think about when i saw this. probably need to start doing something more productive with my life
#112 - ICEDgrunge
Reply +3
(08/17/2012) [-]
This is amazing. I won't lie when I say I had a hard time fathoming what was going on at every second.
#111 - shadowstepone ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
there's a single problem with this camera. no matter how impressive it may be, it is still not totally accurate. it is, after all, a composite video of many different attempts of the same thing. as far as current science can tell, there is no such thing as a truly blank environment. any experiment will have minuscule differences between the tests. therefore, they will not be taking a truly accurate picture, as each beam of light would react slightly differently.
#203 to #111 - jgk **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#192 to #111 - anon
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
Don't be that guy
#150 to #111 - afluffycupcake
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
every thing as a problem when it is first invented. phones were never perfect at first, they still arent. the first cellphone only had a half hour of talk time out of every recharge and it weighed over 2 pounds. the first computer took up an entire room. and back then both completely revolutionary. But with years passing and continuing research and innovations, we have phones and computers that can do so much more and are so much more compact. the same will happen with this camera. its the first edition. in 5, 10, maybe 20 years, theyll be able to improve the quality of the pictures taken to make them more accurate.
#158 to #150 - shadowstepone ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
true, but it is physically impossible to film faster than light in one shot. this will improve, but unless the laws of physics change so that the universe doesn't have a speed limit, this camera is doomed to be an imperfect technology.
#127 to #111 - zigzagderpaderp
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
lol wut
#124 to #111 - anon
Reply 0
(08/17/2012) [-]
You realize that with the rate technology is currently developing that those sorts of issues can be resolved perhaps even within this generation?