Click to expand
Latest users (2): awesomerninjathing, suddenk, anonymous(2).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #42268 - plataeiou ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Welcome, Carter Ashton!
#42262 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
**kkKhris used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**kkKhris rolls 115** EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIP only for european
User avatar #42305 to #42262 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
thomas the tank engine theme (original)! **choochoomofo used "*roll 1, 1-150*"**
**choochoomofo rolls 015** Here come choochoo the clown. Didnt this title used to be a roll of 1-100?
User avatar #42308 to #42305 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
nope 0-150 just like the us championship
User avatar #42309 to #42308 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
Doesn't matter much to me anyways, I'm leaving this Saturday to go touring a few u.s. states. IC champ and Euro, good job man.
#42310 to #42309 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
Ty have fun on your tirp
User avatar #42311 to #42310 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
thanks man
User avatar #42306 to #42305 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
holy shit i suck at this
User avatar #42285 to #42262 - ideclarewar (02/07/2015) [-]
**ideclarewar used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**ideclarewar rolls 091**
#42287 to #42285 - ideclarewar (02/07/2015) [-]
well shit
well shit
User avatar #42264 to #42262 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
European and pending IC Champion? Very noice!
User avatar #42277 to #42264 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
Does choochoomofo's alter ego, choochootheclown count as a European Its literally just choochoomofo rolling, but he posts the Thomas the Tank Engine theme with his roll. We joked about it the other day
User avatar #42280 to #42277 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
I suppose that could work
#42271 to #42264 - anonymous (02/07/2015) [-]
(hes the only person who competes for the European, suddenk just does it for fun so his rolls don't really count)
#42267 to #42264 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
thanks i know
User avatar #42316 to #42267 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
how the fuck is kurt angle european champion?
User avatar #42318 to #42316 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
cuz people from the us could win the euro title in the wwf
User avatar #42319 to #42318 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
then what's the point?
User avatar #42322 to #42319 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
fuck if i know?
User avatar #42273 to #42267 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
kkKhris, it has come to my attention that you just might be the only European on here. Even if that isn't true, then still try to invite more Europeans. Maybe even people on social media sites
#42295 to #42273 - ideclarewar has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42251 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
The titles that have to be defended soon(if you're European, I understand if it isn't soon):

-Tag Team
User avatar #42263 to #42251 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
how much longer till roll for the IC ends and whats are the rule for the defending the IC?
User avatar #42307 to #42263 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
I think its 3 hours per title, excluding Hardcore
User avatar #42269 to #42263 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
It's already done, and you are the new Intercontinental Champion!
User avatar #42254 to #42251 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
Im still not clear on the Tag rules.
User avatar #42260 to #42254 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Were close to concluding the rules
User avatar #42261 to #42260 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
#42244 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Since we got Fall Out Boy to apologize for ESPN playing their song too much, can we get the same from Lenny Kravitz for "I'm a Believer"?
#42237 - fuckberries (02/07/2015) [-]
Well, honestly didn't know I had this title.    
Time to put it on the line guys! Account must be over 150   
roll 1, 0-150   
highest roll wins the titles! Rolling goes for 3 hours or until 12 AM EST
Well, honestly didn't know I had this title.

Time to put it on the line guys! Account must be over 150

roll 1, 0-150

highest roll wins the titles! Rolling goes for 3 hours or until 12 AM EST
User avatar #42245 to #42237 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
**AreyouSerious used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**AreyouSerious rolls 121**
User avatar #42243 to #42237 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
**suddenk used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**suddenk rolls 087**
User avatar #42241 to #42237 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
**themanwithnoplan used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**themanwithnoplan rolls 032**

I'm still getting adjusted to new system
#42240 to #42237 - themanwithnoplan has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42239 to #42237 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
**bondofsnow used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**bondofsnow rolls 056** AreyouSerious suddenk darealsnooki choochoomofo kkKhris saltyfries
#42247 to #42239 - bondofsnow has deleted their comment [-]
#42242 to #42239 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #42248 to #42242 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
just summoning people
User avatar #42238 to #42237 - fuckberries (02/07/2015) [-]
**fuckberries used "*roll 1, 0-150*"**
**fuckberries rolls 061**

Rolling to retain
User avatar #42212 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
What about the US title?
User avatar #42215 to #42212 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
fuckberries is the holder
User avatar #42236 to #42215 - fuckberries (02/07/2015) [-]
oh shit i forgot all about that with the whole Tag titles fiasco!
User avatar #42213 to #42212 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
I still don't know if the Tag Title is supposed to be on the line since the original rule was once every 3 days and the last defence (that was open to all) was two days ago
User avatar #42226 to #42213 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
you want to defend it with the old rules
User avatar #42235 to #42226 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
Lets just wait till tomorrow, I want everyone to be 100% clear with what the rules are plus there are not many people who play the game on the board right now.
User avatar #42225 to #42213 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
I would just wait for darealsnooki to say something, if not then just do it tomorrow.
User avatar #42216 to #42213 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
I think were supposed to defend it. But this time with the new shitty rules
User avatar #42223 to #42216 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
The only part of the new rules that I truly dislike is that everyone gets 3 rolls, especially since theres a 1(x)/15 chance that a new champ will be declared, with (x) being the number of rollers.
#42222 to #42216 - choochoomofo has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #42221 to #42216 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
what's shitty about it?
User avatar #42227 to #42221 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
-Use "roll 1, 1-15" still, but ONLY reply to the champion. If you match someone else's roll within that thread by the end of the 3 hour time limit, then you and that one person are tag champs. Also, if more than 4 people are victorious, the people that rolled the highest matched numbers are the winners.

-Users can have up to 3 tries on rolling, and no more, at a post. I call this the "darealsnooki Rule", as it is obvious that I had one too many chances at the titles the last time they were defended

These are the current rules, i think the removal of the "darealsnooki Rule" would nice. Then the champs would at least have a chance to retain.
User avatar #42252 to #42227 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
There are exceptions to that rule, but if y'all really find it to be bad, then I suppose I could find a new limit.

Instead of 3, should it be 10?
#42256 to #42252 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
or something like this. 1 roll but you can reply to others with new rolls.
User avatar #42259 to #42256 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
As in 3 rolls per person?
#42265 to #42259 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
No. That was just the sample size. A person can only roll Type A once. But as long as its a reply to another Type A comment then they can roll as many times as he wants
User avatar #42266 to #42265 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Explain the roll types?
User avatar #42270 to #42266 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
When the tag team belts picture gets posted a person replies with a roll (roll type a). when a person replies to someones ROLL TYPE A thats a ROLL TYPE B
User avatar #42272 to #42270 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
I think I'm getting it, but still not too sure.

I noticed that in the picture, Roll Type A has 3 replies, Roll Type B1 has 2 replies, and Roll Type B2 has one reply. I can't explain what it is, but I'm guessing the quantity of the replies has something to do with the Roll Types?
User avatar #42275 to #42272 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
It's all the same amount of replies. person 1 can only have 1 ROLL TYPE A. But an unlimited amount of _ ROLL TYPE B_ . Its simply the old rules but without people spamming rolls hoping to get partners
User avatar #42279 to #42275 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
This thread is almost coming to an end, but I'd still like to discuss this a little more. So once it does end, let's chat on my profile, or yours. Whatever suits you.

Anyways, I was thinking that I could create an entirely new tag team championship. People who roll Type A and win, those people will get the "higher up" tag team titles, and the people that use Type B roll will win the "lower down" tag team titles

User avatar #42281 to #42279 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
You're not getting it. Somebody rolls and somebody replies. The old rolls. But no spamming like you were doing hoping to find new partners. Replying to peoples rolls with a new roll is ok. But rolling more than once so that people can reply to you and increase your chances to win is not. I don't know how I can explain this more simpler. You're over complicating it. It just the old rules but with no spamming
User avatar #42283 to #42281 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Okay, so the person replies to the title picture with a total of 9 rolls in all. Another user can reply to them, but can only reply once if they choose Type A, can reply twice with Type B, can reply 3 times with Type B2?
User avatar #42289 to #42283 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
suddenk is this what you mean:

-Roll 1-15 to the champion, this is your original "challenger" roll. You may only do this once

-Roll 1-15 as a reply to someone's "challenger roll", you may do this once per challenger, but may do this to as many challengers as you want.

-The title is on the line for 3 hours

-The tile must be put on the line every 3 days
User avatar #42291 to #42289 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
This is why were partners. This dude gets me.
User avatar #42286 to #42283 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
No. I only used TYPE A and TYPE B to help label them. The person replies to the picture once. And he can reply to the other people who replied to the picture and others can reply to his roll. But he can't reply to the picture more than once, only reply to other people more than once.
User avatar #42288 to #42286 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
I feel like I'm getting it now.

So, one reply to the title picture, and other people reply to that reply if they want to be tag champs with that person?
User avatar #42290 to #42288 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
YES. Like the first time
User avatar #42292 to #42290 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
I see what you mean by me over-thinking this.

I apologize for annoying you on this. I am really giving myself a mental facepalm
User avatar #42293 to #42292 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
It's cool. I just didn't want you to misinterpret this and make crazier new rules
User avatar #42274 to #42272 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
Hes saying you can only do roll type A once
You can do roll type B as many times as you want.
User avatar #42276 to #42274 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #42257 to #42256 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
Thats how it used to be
User avatar #42258 to #42257 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
and it was good
User avatar #42255 to #42252 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
1 roll per person 1-20. If you match with someone then team up. simple as that
User avatar #42253 to #42252 - bondofsnow (02/07/2015) [-]
you mean like 10 rolls per user?

Also, suddenk are you on right now?
User avatar #42229 to #42227 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
let's tell him that, we don't want to roll with that rule, everybody gets one
User avatar #42224 to #42221 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
The original rule was reply to someone with the same roll. now its if you roll the same number even if its not a reply to the person then you become champs with that person.
User avatar #42228 to #42224 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
I like these rules, there's almost an impossible chance that you'll roll the same number as the person replying
User avatar #42230 to #42228 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
1/15 chance to match. 1/10 to roll dubs for the hardcore title. It's only slightly harder.
User avatar #42233 to #42230 - choochoomofo (02/07/2015) [-]
I suggested the idea of the new rule for the Tag Titles, but only because I didn't want people to roll thirty times and be able to win (I didn't want anyone to get screwed again). However, the secondary rule, which I didn't suggest, makes my original suggestion make the game even less fair to the holders. I did a test on my profile (I said this) : I'm going to do an experiment, we have ~7 frequently active competitors who each get 3 rolls of 1-15. Im going to roll 1-15 on my profile 21 times (7x3=21) . Lets see how many times similar numbers are rolled. I'll post results under this comment , go to my profile to see rolls if ya want. . The results were that 7/21 numbers matched, so theres a 1/3 chance the title will change hands. Then we were told that the champs can't roll to defend, which makes the game even less in their favor.

What I originally said: I have a suggestion for a rule change regarding the title. Everyone who wants the title rolls 1-15 but they have to respond to the person who first made the comment (to use the latest defence as an example, everyone would respond to suddenk and ONLY suddenk). After 3 hours whoever has a matching pair of rolls are the tag champs. If there are no matching rolls then the current champs automatically retain. If there are multiple matching rolls then the highest pair wins. I just don't want this to happen again
User avatar #42232 to #42230 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
We'll see how these rules work out and we'll figure it out
User avatar #42234 to #42232 - suddenk (02/07/2015) [-]
If they changed it from 1-15 to 1-20. It would be better. Because titles aren't supposed to change hands after each defense. The title holder(s) need a chance to at least keep it
User avatar #42214 to #42213 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
darealsnooki would know, but i think it either today or tomorrow
#42204 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #42210 to #42204 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #42211 to #42210 - AreyouSerious (02/07/2015) [-]
you're our John Cena!
#42189 - suddenk (02/06/2015) [-]
**suddenk used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**suddenk rolls 010** Defending Intercontinental Title. Closest to 500 wins
User avatar #42217 to #42189 - bigshowsteveo (02/07/2015) [-]
**bigshowsteveo used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**bigshowsteveo rolls 269**
User avatar #42205 to #42189 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
**kkKhris used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**kkKhris rolls 448**
#42208 to #42205 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
User avatar #42202 to #42189 - fuckberries (02/06/2015) [-]
**fuckberries used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**fuckberries rolls 323**
#42201 to #42189 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
**saltyfries used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**saltyfries rolls 416**
User avatar #42200 to #42189 - AreyouSerious (02/06/2015) [-]
**AreyouSerious used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**AreyouSerious rolls 382**
User avatar #42193 to #42189 - choochoomofo (02/06/2015) [-]
**choochoomofo used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**choochoomofo rolls 040**
User avatar #42191 to #42189 - bondofsnow (02/06/2015) [-]
**bondofsnow used "*roll 1, 0-500*"**
**bondofsnow rolls 156**
User avatar #42190 to #42189 - suddenk (02/06/2015) [-]
well im fucked
User avatar #42184 - bondofsnow (02/06/2015) [-]
**bondofsnow used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**bondofsnow rolls 79** rolling for fuckberries ' hardcore title
User avatar #42218 to #42184 - bigshowsteveo (02/07/2015) [-]
**bigshowsteveo used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**bigshowsteveo rolls 98**
User avatar #42194 to #42184 - choochoomofo (02/06/2015) [-]
**choochoomofo used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**choochoomofo rolls 07**
User avatar #42188 to #42184 - suddenk (02/06/2015) [-]
**suddenk used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**suddenk rolls 36**
#42185 to #42184 - fuckberries (02/06/2015) [-]
mmm.. just going to put this out there for people to stare at. Because no one is winning it!
User avatar #42206 to #42185 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
**kkKhris used "*roll 1, 0-99*"**
**kkKhris rolls 21**
User avatar #42199 to #42185 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
**saltyfries used "*roll 1, 11-99*"**
**saltyfries rolls 34**
User avatar #42187 to #42185 - bondofsnow (02/06/2015) [-]
You've had the HC title for quite a while, pretty impressive. also darealsnooki when are me and suddenk defend our tag titles next
User avatar #42250 to #42187 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/07/2015) [-]
Sometime before Friday ends
#42180 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
Should they fire her? I think Chris Paul has a point. Her Tech Fouls were just retarded. If she can't handle the competitive nature of the NBA then this really isn't a place for her.
#42179 - AreyouSerious (02/06/2015) [-]
**AreyouSerious used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**AreyouSerious rolls 0,109**

Okay everyone, defending the Heavyweight championship and GO!
User avatar #42220 to #42179 - bigshowsteveo (02/07/2015) [-]
**bigshowsteveo used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**bigshowsteveo rolls 0,518**
User avatar #42207 to #42179 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
**kkKhris used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**kkKhris rolls 0,308**
User avatar #42203 to #42179 - fuckberries (02/07/2015) [-]
**fuckberries used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**fuckberries rolls 0,566**
User avatar #42196 to #42179 - choochoomofo (02/06/2015) [-]
**choochoomofo used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**choochoomofo rolls 0,067**
#42195 to #42179 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
**saltyfries used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**saltyfries rolls 0,770**
User avatar #42186 to #42179 - suddenk (02/06/2015) [-]
**suddenk used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**suddenk rolls 0,572**
User avatar #42182 to #42179 - bondofsnow (02/06/2015) [-]
**bondofsnow used "*roll 1, 0-1000*"**
**bondofsnow rolls 0,535**
#42178 - AreyouSerious has deleted their comment [-]
#42176 - onemanstand ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
North London derby (Tottenham v. Arsenal)
Madrid derby (Atlético Madrid v. Real Madrid)
Merseyside derby (Everton v. Liverpool)
Juventus v. Milan
Sporting CP v. SL Benfica
PSG v. Lyon
Stuttgart v. Bayern

Derby day HYPE lads
User avatar #42170 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
> Russel Wilson leaving the hospital kind of sad one day cause he just lost the super bowl
> Kid walks up from behind
> "Hey Russel I think you played a great game, I - if that means anything"
> kid asks "wwant some of my coke?"
> Russel takes the coke, drinks a bit, starts to leave
>"bye r-russ"
>Wilson turns around
>"Hey Kid!"
> Tosses his Jersey over with a smile
> Intercepted by Butler
#42231 to #42159 - kkKhris (02/07/2015) [-]
Jordan- is goat.
Russell -Most titles
Magic and Bird-would not be as great if it was not for each other. also the best one on one rivals of all time
#42175 to #42159 - AreyouSerious (02/06/2015) [-]
#42165 to #42159 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
Jordan - Best all around
Magic - Best at managing the game
Kareem - Most points and best center
Russell - Most championships
User avatar #42163 to #42159 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
I can't pick Charles Barkley 4 times :^(
#42164 to #42163 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
Since I have suffered from this so, I have decided on a theme
User avatar #42162 to #42159 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
> Lebron
> Needs to be on a team full of superstars to win a championship.
> Get raped by Mavs
> Rushmore
Sit down
User avatar #42171 to #42162 - abject (02/06/2015) [-]
I almost replaced Lebron with Oscar Robertson.
#42158 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
I'm a little shocked right now, Paul Chryst is already doing a good job, he managed to steal a recruit! He got one of my local natives to come to Wisconsin instead of Northern Illinois. QB Alec Ingold was going to Northern Illinois instead of WI until Paul showed up. For now he's going to play LB, but he will convert to QB if necessary. Ingold graduated from my high school of Bay Port, located in Howard/Suamico, WI, just north of Green Bay.
User avatar #42161 to #42158 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
Why do you even care about College football? The only game I cared about was Winston getting raped, no pun intended.
User avatar #42169 to #42161 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
cuz I'm a sports fan, and being from Wisconsin, we're heavily inclined to love our sports, ranging from Packers, Badgers, to Brewers. Also, college football is fun as fuck
#42173 to #42169 - repostsrepost (02/06/2015) [-]
College Football is only really huge in the South and Midwest. (Southern Cal too I guess) With a lot schools you're talking about 100 years of history. If you live in or near one of those fanbases its one of the most exciting sports cultures there is in this country.
User avatar #42174 to #42173 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
fuck yeah dude! Wisconsin is one of the oldest too! Badger pride!
#42249 to #42174 - repostsrepost (02/07/2015) [-]
I got respect for the Big Ten/ SEC schools that have a ton of history that go back to before there were even tvs to watch them on

Here in Florida our teams weren't relevent until the 80s/90s. Florida was the last team to win their first natty in '96 and FSU pretty much didn't have a football program before Bowden took over in 76 and is only on their second head coach since then. Hell, even UCF has had their moment to shine lately. The culture here isn't as intense as in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, or Alabama but it's still awesome if you're in the right place.
User avatar #42154 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
This is the 2nd week that I forgot to watch Smackdown. Damn you Thursdays
User avatar #42157 to #42154 - fuckberries (02/06/2015) [-]
Oh you mean Thursday Night Raw? Yeah I'm sure you didn't miss much there buddy.
User avatar #42172 to #42157 - darealsnooki ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
User avatar #42153 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
The 2015 nfl home / away schedules are basically out.

Home Buffalo, Miami, NY Jets, Jacksonville, Tennessee, Philadelphia, Washington, Pittsburgh

Away Buffalo, Miami, NY Jets, Houston, Indianapolis, Dallas, NY Giants, Denver

Just goes to show how hard it is to repeat because the NFL will make the schedule as hard as possible. All the tough games are road games and all the easy games are home games. I mean, between Denver / Steelers the Steelers are the easy non-division opponents. Dallas and Giants are much harder than Eagles and Redskins. And Colts and Texans are harder than Jacksonville and Titans. But overall this schedule is easier than last year since it's not the NFC North and AFC West which are both better than the NFC East and AFC South respectively.

Checking out Seattle and Packers schedules too:
Home Arizona, San Francisco, St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Carolina
Away Arizona, San Francisco, St. Louis, Green Bay, Minnesota, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Dallas

Again, more hard road games.

Packers on the other hand have a tough schedule period, but they get a ton of good home games:

Home Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, St. Louis, Seattle, Kansas City, San Diego, Dallas
Away Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, Arizona, San Francisco, Denver, Oakland, Carolina

Playing 4 tough teams at home, and 3 tough teams on the road (non division). Still, I think they have a tough schedule by default.

#42181 to #42153 - anonymous (02/06/2015) [-]
>putting Giants over Eagles
User avatar #42183 to #42181 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
> Eli beat Brady in the SB twice... do you even watch Football?
#42192 to #42183 - anonymous (02/06/2015) [-]
> Eli is nowhere near as good as what he once was
> Just because you did something once doesn't mean you will do it again

Have you not watched football for the past few years or something?
User avatar #42349 to #42192 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/07/2015) [-]
There is always a QB who just has your number. Everyone has one. Eli is the one for Brady. I think the Giants are more difficult than the Eagles because they have better receivers and better defense. Their secondary got demolished by injuries and Victor Cruz was gone in a few weeks. The Eagles couldn't beat any good team without a ton of Luck (literally, luck threw a pick on a drive where a FG would ice the game).
#42198 to #42192 - anonymous (02/06/2015) [-]
well, twice. But you get the point
User avatar #42166 to #42153 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
Holy fuck, Colts have an easy af schedule

Home: Houston, Jacksonville, Tennessee, New England, New York Jets, New Orleans, Tampa Bay and Denver

Road: Houston, Jacksonville, Tennessee, Buffalo, Miami, Atlanta, Carolina, Pittsburgh

2 hardest games are at home. Calling it now, 13-3 Colts
User avatar #42167 to #42166 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/06/2015) [-]
Their schedule is easier than last year. Last year they had Denver on road, Ravens, Dallas on road, Eagles, Patriots. And that was it for hard games, they easily won 11 games but lost every single hard game. They played a Bengals team that stinks in the playoffs and then beat an injured Peyton, then got absolutely demolished by the Patriots.

This year, the hardest games are the Bills and Dolphins on the road. But I also think New England is going to give them trouble and if NO gets their act together, they will be tough too.

I think they will
1. Sweep their own division - 6 wins
2. Win 2/4 of the AFC East - 2 Wins
3. Win 3/4 of the NFC South - 3 Wins
4. Lose to Denver or Pitt - 1 win
User avatar #42168 to #42167 - themanwithnoplan ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
I'm counting on NO still crashing and burning
#42152 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
So apparently Packers maybe going with Ron Zook as next ST coach. So I read up on him and he seems like he has far more football and coaching experience than Slocum does. I think it's a good promotion for him as he was assistant this season. He has Head coaching experience from Florida (SEC) and Illinois (B1G) and ST experience from Pittsburgh. Apparently, I just read that Slocum prior to the Packers, had 0 nfl experience... No wonder we've been bad at Special Teams
#42145 - AreyouSerious (02/06/2015) [-]
ALRIGHT You good for nothing slugs that barely pass for FJWF Superstars! I know you're all chomping at the bit to face the greatest FJWF World Heavyweight Champion!! Well now you get your chance. THIS Friday Night I'm putting my Title on the line for you FAT ASSES! So your FAT ASSES can from a line and watch me take my title back! This is the second time I'd have to remind you fellas while you were beaten each other over the heads with chairs!
User avatar #42148 to #42145 - saltyfries ONLINE (02/06/2015) [-]
Scott Steiner: "Fat Asses"
 Friends (0)