Upload
Login or register
Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
asd
#7141 - gibusernamepls
Reply 0
(07/18/2016) [-]
#7139 - mrbator
Reply 0
(07/16/2016) [-]
Not sure if this is the right place but one of the ads on here when using mobile redirects me multiple times.
#7138 - alapazama ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/15/2016) [-]
/user/admin
#7137 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/15/2016) [-]
I am not sure if it counts as spam, I flagged it as spam already, but I don't know if mods would understand what I mean:
/Pokemon+go/hdgifs/5974300/
This upload consisting of MP4 files is titled "Pokemon GO" while there is NOT A SINGLE
reference to Pokemmon whatsoever in the content.
Again, I'm not sure if just flagging that as spam would be enough so I posted it here
#7151 to #7137 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
dude what
#7152 to #7151 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
Somebody simply faked information about the content (title in this case) to get more views. Are you implying I did something wrong ?
#7153 to #7152 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
That's not really spam though
#7154 to #7153 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
I said it 2 times in my intial post, that I wasn't sure where to report this. Your pretentions are out of line.
#7155 to #7154 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
I'm saying you're overreacting to someone putting pokemon go in their title
#7156 to #7155 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
I'd let it pass if it was titled "World of Tanks" or "Harry Potter", but there is big boom for Pokemon Go, so it's obviously a scam. I'm hyped for new game.

I see it's title on the front page. So I click.

I hope you now understand that this is very toxic and should be forbidden.
#7157 to #7156 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
I might click on a post called nigger dicks cause I want to see big black cocks and end up with nothing but hot teen girls. But I'm not gonna stop someone from doing that, cause if I really wanted to see a juicy afrocock all I'd have to do is turn around, ya feel me? I think you need to start feeling me.
#7158 to #7157 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
You mean it's okay, becauze somebody who looks for Pokemon Go content can just leave that scam and find with ease something, that is really about Pokemon ?
#7160 to #7158 - shatraken
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#7159 to #7158 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
Now you getting it
#7161 to #7159 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
You let somebody do bad thing (insolently lying to gain popularity) becauze it has not much of an effect on you except wasting a bit of time.

This is called ignorance.
Now I can't decide who is more disgusting. He in that grinding way... or you in the sad one.
#7162 to #7161 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
Is this a meme I'm not getting
#7163 to #7162 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
Yes. I just insulted you and even included the reason for that.
#7164 to #7163 - desacabose ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
There's no reason for you to get so upset just because someone had a title unrelated to the content, it happens all the time.
#7165 to #7164 - shatraken
Reply 0
(07/26/2016) [-]
Pokemon Go dominated the front page.
Guy who had no content with the game decided to post some MP4 videos unrelated to Pokemon.
He titled it in a way that would bring him many more views than any related to his content.

It's obviously planned. This means he had bad intentions.
It's like putting fake signboard above doors of your store, where customers enter hoping to buy "rainbow ice cream". And you sell only kiwi, chocolate and vanilla ice creams.
But the customer already is there. And he might buy something, even though he wouldn't enter your store if your signboard said "vanilla, chocolate and kiwi
ice creams !!".
You already took his time. Some would leave but some will buy your ice cream, even though you lied to them.

He lied to gain popularity, don't you see it's bad ?!


#7132 - thematthew
Reply 0
(07/13/2016) [-]
the guy using the throw away accounts has down thumbed me around 300 times within the past 7 days, this shit needs to stop, this guy is abusing this site to harass people.
#7136 to #7132 - eonofaeon
Reply 0
(07/13/2016) [-]
400 for me, and in only the past 60~ hours. It's long past being funny.
#7134 to #7132 - anon
Reply 0
(07/13/2016) [-]
it's whattehfuk
#7135 to #7134 - thematthew
Reply 0
(07/13/2016) [-]
actually, you are at the top of my list
#7131 to #7130 - anon
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
Posting to agree. It's gotten so bad I'm having to wait longer n longer between posts on the site.

Please for the love of fucking god admin FIX THIS SHIT.

I'm at -220 and counting; literally being fucking harrassed n targeted.

-EonofAeon
#7129 - BmanX
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
#7125 - thematthew
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
/user/lelos
more vote spamming
#7126 to #7125 - eonofaeon
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
Seconded this one as well.

It has now officially reached problem levels.

My account is getting blasted so hard that I'm getting restricted in posting privileges and harsher n harsher post limits. Eventually I'll be forced to anon post 24/7 cause someone's butt hurt :/
#7123 - BmanX
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
/user/linuxfedora
/user/lelos

The list grows ever more
#7122 - BmanX
Reply 0
(07/12/2016) [-]
Another

/user/polic
#7120 - eonofaeon
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]
/user/spookek

Add yet another to the list. I have been dropped to level -155. Top kek. I have some suspicions on who it is as well due to how some of us have PLUMMETED while others have spontaneously skyrocketed, and the numbers seem most affecting in the 24 hour n 7 day periods.
#7119 - gibusernamepls
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]
/user/tuvg

Another one
#7117 - gibusernamepls
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]
/user/caoscnt

Yet again
#7114 - BmanX
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]
Another spamming account from vgb

/user/aijin
#7116 to #7114 - eonofaeon
Reply +1
(07/11/2016) [-]
Can confirm. I finally got targeted myself in addition to the VGB vets who got bomb'd.
#7115 to #7113 - eonofaeon
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]
Seconded.
#7112 - gibusernamepls
Reply 0
(07/11/2016) [-]