Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (1): akkere, anonymous(25).
Anonymous comments allowed.
102 comments displayed.
#108918 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Does anybody else feel like Cruz just blew it?
#108922 to #108918 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
I didn't get to watch it.
#108920 to #108918 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
nope, he's doing well. He won this debate so far.
#108921 to #108920 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Lol no
#108923 to #108921 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
You're literally delusional if you think Trump or Rubio is winning this debate.
#108924 to #108923 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
There you go with assumptions again. None of the three are, but Cruz is definitely at the bottom. I like Cruz, but he has sucked tonight.
#108930 to #108924 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
You were gonna thumb me down because I said I liked Cruz over Trump earlier
#108931 to #108930 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
I like Cruz, but I like Trump waaay more. Cruz is and almost always has been briefly passed by Carson for #2.
#108926 to #108924 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
It's quite the opposite but ok.
#108927 to #108926 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
He just choked!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL
#108917 - asotil ONLINE
Reply +2
(03/04/2016) [-]
#108916 - asotil ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
"Coming up we're going to be reading some Facebook comments about the debate LIVE"
#108915 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
LITTLE MARCO
I
T
T
L
E

M
A
R
C
O
#108914 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
Also, Ted, to me, has already lost. He keeps repeating himself from past debates that Trump has already called him on. It's just stupid.
#108912 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
I don't like Kasich, but they don't do him right.
#108913 to #108912 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
And I'm tired of Marco and Ted constantly saying to check their website.
#108911 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
"Little Marco"
#108909 - asotil ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
No Problem
#108904 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Rubio has got to go. I hate him so freaking much.
#108900 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Is the debate on? Where's a link?
#108902 to #108900 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
You just missed Donald Trump talking about having a big ding dong.
#108903 to #108902 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Why'd he do that?
#108905 to #108903 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
He said that Rubio implied it by saying that he has small hands.
#108906 to #108905 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Called it
#108907 to #108906 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
You always knee that he was big?
#108908 to #108907 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
Knew
#108910 to #108908 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
hahaha you dick
#108897 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/04/2016) [-]
I wish there was some kind of business board so we could discuss the market and investing.
#108899 to #108897 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
/nsfw_brony/158503#158503

I've begun to clear a path.
#108898 to #108897 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
Okay, I have a few suggestions.

We use advice because it's "financial advice" perhaps.
We can do hobby or social because they're dead.
We can use the NSFW Brony board because those guys need to leave.
#108901 to #108898 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
Smart guy.
#108891 - asotil ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
#108893 to #108891 - anon
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
Face it, You're a cuck.
#108894 to #108893 - asotil ONLINE
Reply +2
(03/04/2016) [-]
Thanks Tito
#108895 to #108894 - anon
Reply -1
(03/04/2016) [-]
#108862 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Debate predictions (not policy related)

Rubio will make fun of Trump. Not just attack, he's going to mock the guy. Trump will probably be more prepared for it this time though.

Trump will interrupt everything Cruz says and point to polls and analysts that say he's winning all night.

Cruz will try to look aggressive. Hopefully it works.

Kasich will be playing Fruit Ninja on his iPhone
#108886 to #108862 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +2
(03/03/2016) [-]
Trump will be policy oriented, and he'll be set in stone. Rubio and Cruz will huff and puff but Trump will not budge. He'll throw a punch if he has to, but he's been pretty consistent in the whole "Acting more president-like" aspect this last week or two. He's still on the high of Super Tuesday, and he had a rally in Maine where he deflected criticism from Mitt Romney so he's got a head start in Maine and I get the feeling he'll have BIG traction in the agrarian states of Kansas and Kentucky, but I'm 99% sure he'll lose Louisiana. Regardless of what tomorrow holds tonight he'll keep himself reigned in and composed and only through a punch if he has to.
#108896 to #108886 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
Who would he lose it to?
#108884 to #108862 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
I want to thumb you down for hoping that Cruz does well over Trump, but I agree with most of it, and it is funny. What do?
#108885 to #108884 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
#108866 to #108862 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
oh shit its today, fuck yes
#108867 to #108866 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Carson is kill
#108868 to #108867 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
If Rubio keeps staying and acting like a tough guy, all he's gonna do is take away Cruz's support thereby giving Trump the nomination. What a retard, he should step down since he has such low delegates and practically no chance.
#108869 to #108868 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Shapiro says Cruz has two paths to victory.
1. Rubio loses Florida, sees the writing on the wall, and drops out, leaving Cruz a chance to catch up
2. Rubio wins Florida, Kasich wins Ohio, and all 4 candidates split the vote in a way so they have to go to a convention.

So Shapiro's pretty confident Rubio is the key factor that's keeping Cruz from even having a chance.

When is Florida anyways? It's gotta be soon.
#108871 to #108869 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Yep I watch his shit the moment it comes out. The nose knows.

FL is March 15th
#108872 to #108871 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Lol
#108854 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Mitt Romney gave a speech slandering Trump at 11:30 AM EST today. It was full of sentimental pandering and mistruths. He also said he wouldn't run for president and also wouldn't endorse any candidates, then turns around and says to vote for Rubio, Cruz, and Kasich (Ben Carson looks like he's done with the race). He basically called Trump a bunch of names and a bad businessman, a bully, and other things, then taunted him and said "he wont attack our differences on policies, he'll attack me by calling me names!"

Trump is gonna respond at 1:30 PM EST once he lands in portland in Maine where he'll shred Romney a new one.
#108859 to #108854 - thereasonableperso
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Do you know where I can see Trumps response when he does respond?
#108860 to #108859 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
www.hulkusc.com/cnn-news-live-streaming/ this link should work, despite potato quality
#108855 to #108854 - thumbfortrump
Reply +3
(03/03/2016) [-]
Does anyone still take R. Money serious?
#108861 to #108855 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Yes
#108856 to #108855 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply +4
(03/03/2016) [-]
Fucking NOPE, but everyone's acting like this is some big hit to Trump, as if Romney has mattered in the last 4 years. But it's just part of the "establishment" trying to slam trump. John McCain on twitter said he agreed with Mitt Romney on Trump. The establishment is getting desperate- shit they'd dig up Ronald Reagan's corpse to throw him around and insult Trump.
#108845 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
www.rt.com/news/334428-north-korea-missile-test/

"North Korea fired six short range missiles into the Sea of Japan, hours after the UN Security Council approved to introduce new sanctions against Pyongyang."

Someone help me out here. Why would they do that.
#108973 to #108845 - jettom
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
I have 3-4 theories regarding this

1) In their mind, threatening the First World might make them drop sanctions through fear. Japan tried this in Pearl Harbor.
2. Some military leaders have begun to fear that Kim Jong Un is afraid of NATO or some shit, so Kim Jong Un ordered this to happen in order to show supremacy and shit.
3. They want to tell the populace that they're attacking the nations responsible for the sanctions.
Or my personal favorite

4. China told them to do it so the western world would focus more on them and less on what they're doing in the South East right now.
#108974 to #108973 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/04/2016) [-]
I like the last one. But I'm positive that the US won't lose focus on the East China Sea, regardless that Obama is in office.
Personally I think it's a propaganda move directed at their own population. I think they are listening less and less to China, since China for the first time ever backed real sanctions.
I sure do hope that their threats manifest into real direct military confrontation soon.
#108847 to #108845 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
They're testing us to see how we will react.
#108849 to #108847 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(03/03/2016) [-]
But, they shot them 100 miles out, and into the water. What purpose does shooting the water have.
#108850 to #108849 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
I believe they wanted to establish that they would keep testing regardless of sanctions. They fired it into the ocean because they didn't want to kill anyone this time.
#108851 to #108850 - lotengo
Reply +2
(03/03/2016) [-]
FishLivesMatter
#108852 to #108851 - canyou
Reply +3
(03/03/2016) [-]
Fins up, don't shoot
#108887 to #108852 - asotil ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/03/2016) [-]
That was proven to be a lie, Gill Fin was proven to tHe rushed officer Heron Gilfin with a claw after robbing a Convenience Pore
#108853 to #108852 - lotengo
Reply +2
(03/03/2016) [-]
He a guud brill, he was an honorary schooling fish, *insert fish pun about church* errey sunfish That is a thing in Dutch, sadly, it doesnt translate
Dem white sharks be stingracist nd sheeit
#108832 - kanadetenshi
Reply +3
(03/03/2016) [-]
#108876 to #108832 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Sanders is a Nordic model social democrat. The countries he idolizes in this respect were enemies of the Soviet Union. It's "surprising" that Sanders supporters don't know how bad it was because they do. Everyone and their mother remembers.

"Socialism" is a very broad field of political thought, and the whole "capitalism is literally so evil that nothing we do is as evil because we aren't capitalists" line of thought was endemic to Russia and the Bolsheviks. Hell, it's considered necessary for capitalism to establish the material conditions for socialism and that capitalism is just the previous step in human progress, while Stalin tried to artificially create these conditions through rapid industrialization, which was doomed to fail.

This is literal political correctness. But of course that phrase doesn't apply to them.
#108858 to #108832 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Holy fuck that was euphoric
#108848 to #108832 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
What a badass.
#108834 to #108832 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
If only Russians would embrace this man.
#108877 to #108834 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Putin somewhat indicates that they are, whether they want to or not.

Also #108876, I was blocked because weeaboos can't handle different opinions.
#108878 to #108877 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
You're #108876?
And what do you mean that they are. All the legislation I've seen coming from Russia the past 5 years is something Kasparov would be directly against. And Putin's ratings are pretty yuge atm.
#108879 to #108878 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
The Russian Federation has always been fairly right wing because of the legacy of the USSR, and recent legislation doesn't much change that trend.

And yes, like I said I had to use anon.
#108837 to #108834 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
If only half of America would.
#108839 to #108837 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
What a wonderful world this could be.
#108840 to #108839 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Why did you change your profile pic to a dog?
#108841 to #108840 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
For lulz.
#108842 to #108841 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
If you did it for me I'd prefer the previous picture instead.
#108843 to #108842 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Did it for myself, thought it was funny. I'll be changing back when I find it boring.
#108812 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
#108828 to #108812 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
full of buzz words
not impressed

5 is alright though
#108821 to #108812 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
This is alright for a right wing perspective. Ironically, though, the formal demand for transparency in the private sector is not a laissez-faire position, which assumes that all actions by consumers is completely consensual and not people making the most of what they have, so any change by government force is considered implicitly unwanted.

Not that this is bad on his part, obviously, but the term "free market" is too heavily misused as "I personally like it".
#108870 to #108821 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
how can individuals agree to a price if they don't know what the price is?
#108873 to #108870 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
By agreeing whether it not they know because in medicine, not agreeing will literally kill you.

I'm not being snarky, I'm implying it's a legitimate ethical debate.
#108888 to #108873 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
monopoly meets inelastic demand
but this is only true for emergency care
it doesn't apply when people have time to shop around

you'll also have a very hard time without housing, food, basic utilities, and you could also argue internet access.
Also long as people can shop around, suppliers have an incentive to lower prices to attract customers.
#108889 to #108888 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
as long as *
#108815 to #108812 - theism
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
2 and 5 are pretty cool.
#108819 to #108815 - lotengo
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Sooner or later, everybody embraces the Trump
#108822 to #108819 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
He seems overwhelmingly popular with people that will never even set foot in the US and are less occupied with their own politics. Just saying.
#108823 to #108822 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
If shit doesn't improve in Europe, the US is my plan B
#108824 to #108823 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Now I think I know why Western Europe politics are unfixable, then.
#108846 to #108824 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Talking about rightwing politics in Western Europe I'd imagine at this point would be similar to talking about capitalism in Soviet Russia.
#108825 to #108824 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
If i start a debate here about Dutch PVV-politician Geert WIlders that hopes we vote no on the geenpeil referendum. What would you say about that?
#108826 to #108825 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
The what? I don't speak Dutch so I don't know the specifics there.
#108827 to #108826 - lotengo
Reply -1
(03/03/2016) [-]
Thats what i mean.

Cant have a discussion on my own politics here, unless its about islam
#108803 - anon
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
www.campusreform.org/?ID=6967

Oh goodie, the next step towards having the actual Speech Police.
#108800 - enlightednatzie
Reply -3
(03/03/2016) [-]
>>#108770, Someone is talking to himself lol
#108857 to #108800 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
If I were you, i woild block lotengo. That's what I did. The dude is a total cry baby. His comments are on the same level of the cringeometer as dalokan's. In fact, he blocked me because I thumbed some of his comments down because I, apparently, was stalking him-- It obviously had nothing to do with the fact that he's a bumbling idiot.
#108863 to #108857 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
So true, he just thinks i am a ''troll'' because i have different opinions than him lmao
#108864 to #108863 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
Check out the hating board. Holy cow, I got so much hate for thumbing you up.
#108865 to #108864 - enlightednatzie
Reply -1
(03/03/2016) [-]
LOL
#108820 to #108800 - lotengo
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
probably you considering everybody who is actually somebody on this board already blocked you
#108829 to #108820 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/03/2016) [-]
why have you not blocked him yet?
#108830 to #108829 - lotengo
Reply +1
(03/03/2016) [-]
I did, you can still thumb and reply ot people you blocked, just not the other way around