Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#63744 - anonymous (05/15/2014) [-]
Kill all faggots. Every last one. Single bullet to the brain, bodies in a shipping crate, cover in lye, bury in a ditch. Erase them from human history. Queers have the same rights as the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement: none whatsoever. Any government that is not actively working to remove threats to humanity itself does not deserve its station.

In before “HURR EDGY”
In before “HURR INSECURE”
In before “HURR BIGOT”
In before "HURR BURGER"
None of those refute the fact that queers have revoked their human rights.
#63742 - anonymous (05/15/2014) [-]
Hey look, I found Schnizel's favorite cereal!
User avatar #63775 to #63742 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
>Nat-soc symbols
>Fascism
User avatar #63809 to #63775 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
It's exactly the same tho
User avatar #63810 to #63809 - schnizel (05/17/2014) [-]
Nope.
Nope and nope.
User avatar #63816 to #63810 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
Jup, it is. You just don't want to be associated with nazis.
User avatar #63818 to #63816 - schnizel (05/17/2014) [-]
voices.yahoo.com/the-differences-between-fascism-national-socialism-2008740.html
No, and no Dutchie.
User avatar #63819 to #63818 - beatmasterz (05/17/2014) [-]
You can't explain it yourself? I'm not reading that, fight your own battles.
User avatar #63820 to #63819 - schnizel (05/17/2014) [-]
It's too late and I'm watching a movie.
Besides, I would have said the same.
#63781 to #63775 - anonymous (05/16/2014) [-]
National Socialism is a form of Fascism, is it not?
0
#63728 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #63727 - ribocoon (05/15/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPTFPzEhHIw
So does anyone else feel like people who are against gays are being unfairly silenced?
I support gay rights 110% but the world has always been "think like us or else you're wrong" and I hate that people are punished and ostracized for their opinions.
Mer I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it kind of thing
#63743 to #63727 - alimais (05/15/2014) [-]
I support gay people who don't feel the need to be a faggot about just being gay and gay on with their lives. Being gay is not a lifestyle or a culture
User avatar #63741 to #63727 - sirlancealotofhoes (05/15/2014) [-]
one is free to comment whatever one likes on events such as the one where the dude kissed another dude.

And likewise is one free to criticize the aforementioned one for making comments about the event. More people seem to be pro gay rights these days, so there will be more critique and some sort of a consensus in the discussion.
#63732 to #63727 - radiserne (05/15/2014) [-]
Well here in Denmark it always make headlines when some neo-nazi or group of radical muslims demonstrates against gay rights. So I wouldn't say they're being silenced, rather frowned upon.
User avatar #63730 to #63727 - schnizel (05/15/2014) [-]
It's degeneracy.
#63726 - anonymous (05/15/2014) [-]
Creepy Reptilian Humanoid Jew Degenerate Club Scumbag
#63724 - commission (05/14/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#63714 - Sunset (05/14/2014) [-]
www.cnn.com/2014/05/14/world/anti-semitism-global-survey/   
   
>1) Jews are more loyal to Israel than to [this country/the countries they live in].   
>2) Jews have too much power in the business world.   
>3) Jews have too much power in international financial markets.   
>4) Jews don’t care about what happens to anyone but their own kind.   
>5) Jews have too much control over global affairs.   
>6) People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.   
>7) Jews think they are better than other people.   
>8) Jews have too much control over the United States government.   
>9) Jews have too much control over the global media.   
>10) Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.   
>11) Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars.   
   
LOL
www.cnn.com/2014/05/14/world/anti-semitism-global-survey/

>1) Jews are more loyal to Israel than to [this country/the countries they live in].
>2) Jews have too much power in the business world.
>3) Jews have too much power in international financial markets.
>4) Jews don’t care about what happens to anyone but their own kind.
>5) Jews have too much control over global affairs.
>6) People hate Jews because of the way Jews behave.
>7) Jews think they are better than other people.
>8) Jews have too much control over the United States government.
>9) Jews have too much control over the global media.
>10) Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust.
>11) Jews are responsible for most of the world’s wars.

LOL
#63717 to #63714 - byposted (05/14/2014) [-]
Foxman would be an "anti-Semite" according to this "stereotype" test; that is, were he to take it privately, and the questions slightly modified to come off more formally (#1 becoming We are more loyal to Israel than the United States).

The irony is lost in those who actually believe the Jewish fable which goes that "anti-semitism" is some sort of "disease" with no rational basis. The "study," of course, presupposes this framework.
0
#63716 to #63714 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#63715 to #63714 - anonymous (05/14/2014) [-]
12) Jews have too much nose.
User avatar #63695 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Pebar, your free-market killed 300 miners.
You need to login to view this link
User avatar #63735 to #63695 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/15/2014) [-]
Your fascism killed millions of people
User avatar #63736 to #63735 - schnizel (05/15/2014) [-]
not fascist
reactionary
dont tell anyone
But what millions of people?
Also, bare in mind that the communists have killed 91 milllions of silly goys.
User avatar #63737 to #63736 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/15/2014) [-]
I'm just using the same logic you are....
User avatar #63738 to #63737 - schnizel (05/15/2014) [-]
But killed for being what is also a good question.
#63723 to #63695 - byposted (05/14/2014) [-]
>linking threads
User avatar #63729 to #63723 - schnizel (05/15/2014) [-]
*dibs bedora*
User avatar #63698 to #63697 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
*dibs smaller goverment*
Speakers are broken, explain it to me.
User avatar #63699 to #63698 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
Competition between employers gives better working conditions
Unions and government, while they sometimes help, often interfere with competition.
User avatar #63700 to #63699 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Top fucking kek m8
You have tought me that workers be expendable yaal
And that the corporation works for the profit not the worker.
User avatar #63701 to #63700 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
Of course they work for profit...
If there was no profit, they wouldn't work at all.
#63702 to #63701 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Atleast the socialist think about the well being of others.
#63703 to #63702 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
Thinking about the well being of others doesn't do jack shit.
Competitive free markets actually do improve people's well-being.
User avatar #63704 to #63703 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
That's bullshit, the leftists wanted to make better safety regulations and the happy mercahants denied thm that.
Muh free market, to fucking kek m8.
User avatar #63707 to #63704 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
And what do you think would've been the cost of those regulations?
Regulations increase the cost of business.
More costs = less business
Less business = less coal
Less coal = less fuel
Less fuel = reduced entire economy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation#Causes
User avatar #63708 to #63707 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Yeah, you can't spare a few dosh for the safety of your workers.
And they call me a monster.
#63684 - minibeep (05/14/2014) [-]
Obama is monkeybush!
prove me wrong
User avatar #63686 to #63684 - sirlancealotofhoes (05/14/2014) [-]
bush give oil man money
obama give bank man money
#63687 to #63686 - minibeep (05/14/2014) [-]
so Obama is jewish monkeybush?
User avatar #63682 - feelythefeel (05/14/2014) [-]
nation.foxnews.com/2014/05/11/dont-wanna-pull-something


Daily reminder that this is journalism now.

This is news.
User avatar #63720 to #63682 - byposted (05/14/2014) [-]
That is an old picture too, from a "let's move" advert.
0
#63719 to #63682 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#63688 to #63682 - anonymous (05/14/2014) [-]
lol calm your tits, it's just a picture,it's not meant to be some scathing attack on your heroes.
User avatar #63696 to #63688 - feelythefeel (05/14/2014) [-]
I never said they were my heroes, I'm just saying that "Some guys stretched today" is only journalism in this day and age.
#63678 - funnyjunkelite (05/14/2014) [-]
that feel when one of your colonies rebels against you
#63672 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/14/2014) [-]
What do you guys think about the Golden Dawn in Greece?

I personally think it would be fucking amazing if they actually became rulers of the country because it would be really entertaining and interesting to know what would happen.


Also, since the prison system is so bad in America, what should be done about it to

a. Make it less horrible if at all because I'm sure some people here are gonna say no , the whole good luck getting raped in prison should not be happening

b. and reduce costs

c. and reduce # of people coming in

Should we lean towards scare tactics and severe penalties like death penalty for many serious crimes or rehabilitation and such crap?
#63731 to #63672 - radiserne (05/15/2014) [-]
**radiserne rolled image** Do you find it entertaining when people are oppressed? That's pretty messed up
**radiserne rolled image** Do you find it entertaining when people are oppressed? That's pretty messed up
User avatar #63725 to #63672 - commission (05/14/2014) [-]
if they do gain power, nato would just send troops in
#63692 to #63672 - anonymous (05/14/2014) [-]
+ in America some prisons simply put People in 100% isolation for months and even years and they come out even worse than before amazing
User avatar #63681 to #63672 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
10/10
#63656 - anonymous (05/13/2014) [-]
Israel be like
#63671 to #63670 - byposted (05/14/2014) [-]
Nice thumbnail
Nice thumbnail
User avatar #63674 to #63671 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/14/2014) [-]
shiiiiiiiiieeeet i always forget
#63677 to #63674 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
here's one
User avatar #63647 - schnizel (05/13/2014) [-]
Pebar, do you think a Monarchy is bad?
User avatar #63655 to #63647 - pebar (05/13/2014) [-]
yes
User avatar #63680 to #63655 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #63683 to #63680 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
they tend to get out of control
User avatar #63693 to #63683 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
How do they tend to get out of control?
User avatar #63706 to #63705 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
In the end yes, but atleast a king serves a country, a happy merchant serves money.
#63709 to #63706 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
Kings serve themselves, just like le happy merchant.

But le happy merchant's desire for profit encourages production and encourages voluntary cooperation.
#63710 to #63709 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Holy fucking shit!
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!
The happy merchant is destroying the world with his greed and shady neo-capitalism.
A king serves his men.
A merchant serves money.
Man>Money
User avatar #63712 to #63710 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
I forgot you don't have speakers
#63711 to #63710 - pebar (05/14/2014) [-]
People ARE greedy; it is human-nature to be self-centered.
Morality doesn't change this.

Kings are people. Governments are made up of people.
There is a whole branch of economics that studies this; it's called Public Choice.

Economics is Fun, Part 17: Public Choice
#63713 to #63711 - schnizel (05/14/2014) [-]
Yes, a shit load of children know more than a father that is bloodbound to them.
Atleast kings are trained and born to lead a country, people tend to chose the one that lies the best in an election.
User avatar #63756 to #63713 - ablueguy (05/16/2014) [-]
Kings can be good, however, the selection of a king based solely on blood ties seems a little foolish, since it has let some pretty weak-minded and morally degenerated people into power, which is not a good thing for the common people.
#63761 to #63756 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
If a father was a good king, and if he raised his son to be a good one as well, I don't see a problem with that.
User avatar #63769 to #63761 - ablueguy (05/16/2014) [-]
Me neither.
I was just saying that eventually you get a bad king, or a string of bad kings, and poof, revolution.
Or you get what happened in Britain, and the Parliament/Council of whatever gets tired of a bad kings bullshit and decides to take away their political power, and incest it in offices almost resembling what Rome had before the God-kings that the Caesars were..
User avatar #63770 to #63769 - schnizel (05/16/2014) [-]
If a king is bad there is always the plan B.
#63685 to #63683 - minibeep (05/14/2014) [-]
People are bad
User avatar #63660 to #63655 - sirlancealotofhoes (05/13/2014) [-]
well, I'm glad that's sorted. Who's gonna tell Britain?
User avatar #63651 to #63647 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/13/2014) [-]
Of course he's gonna fucking say yes.
#63645 - schnizel (05/13/2014) [-]
This made me lol
User avatar #63676 to #63645 - johnstuartmill (05/14/2014) [-]
Aggregate demand for demolition that is.
#63635 - pebar (05/13/2014) [-]
schnizel
#63625 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/13/2014) [-]
So, is anyone here actually for Russia in this entire situation we call the Ukraine Crisis and why? I'm here to argue and see other perspectives.
So, is anyone here actually for Russia in this entire situation we call the Ukraine Crisis and why? I'm here to argue and see other perspectives.
User avatar #63657 to #63625 - byposted (05/13/2014) [-]
I support Russia on a nationalist platform. The Federation had a core in the Donbas, as in the Crimean Peninsula, and proper justification to cease it.

I remember reading a post by Church here a while ago, before the annexation of the Crimea. He used a very liberal line to denounce Russia's intervention, as it were: it isn't the 19th century anymore. I wish I could ask him for clarification, as Russia has never been bound by the cosmopolitan structure of the EU. Nor has the US, for that matter, whose tentacles were in Galicia from the beginning.
User avatar #63673 to #63657 - byposted (05/14/2014) [-]
seize*
#63642 to #63625 - anonymous (05/13/2014) [-]
You won't find many westerners for Russia. But what irritates me is that the West seems somewhat shocked that Russia is acting the way they are. The West has been poking the bear ever since the wall came down, and the NATO boarder has been moving increasingly closer to the Russian. Ukraine was one of the few pro-russian countries left, and with a 40+ million population, its quite an ally to suddenly lose. Furthermore, Russians have a great deal of national pride, and the way the West has been acting over the years, they've felt mocked and humiliated, especially during Yeltsin's period. Putin is restoring this national pride. This whole Ukraine affair has only been favorable for him and Russia.
So basically, westerners hate him, but the Russians worship him.
User avatar #63648 to #63642 - lulzfornigeriagirl (05/13/2014) [-]
Yes I know, but you seem to still agree it's not justified right?
#63654 to #63648 - anonymous (05/13/2014) [-]
From a Russian viewpoint I'd say it is. The West slept in class and gave Putin the needed situation to strengthen Russias geopolitical position. But I'd be careful to take anyone's side until the presidential elections are over. The core of the conflict is that no one knows what the people wants, which both sides are using to their advantage. When/if the elections are held properly, we will know who are the good guys in this conflict - if there are any.
User avatar #63630 to #63625 - ronniesan (05/13/2014) [-]
As far as taking the Crimea I get it. They want the port, they invested in the port over years, and they're afraid that they wont be allowed to rent it under the new Ukrainian leadership. Ukraine is s pisspoor country that could make use of the Russian leadership, It would probably be best for Russia to just take the entire nation but that likely wont happen.
User avatar #63629 to #63625 - majormavor (05/13/2014) [-]
why are you such a faggot?

That is the question
#63627 to #63625 - lulzfordonetsk (05/13/2014) [-]
Any actual argument for Russia? Like seriously? The eye for an eye argument doesn't work, there is no real justification, the only thing is the nationalistic bias you have towards your country cough cough schnizel this is why it can be a problem cough cough and I actually have a Russia friend like that who happens to be very intelligent except for this one issue.
User avatar #63624 - feelythefeel (05/13/2014) [-]
youtu.be/P8UQnQMicRA?t=2m15s

If you were given this speech, how willing to fight to the last would you be on a scale of completely to absolutely?
#63618 - anonymous (05/12/2014) [-]
meemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemow
meemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemow
#63620 to #63618 - anonymous (05/12/2014) [-]
Shitposting loudly
#63623 to #63620 - anonymous (05/13/2014) [-]
meemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemow
meemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemowmeemow
#63601 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
Pebar, herrrroooo!
#63603 to #63602 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
jewishcommunazi!
Don't make me zykolne b y
So pebar, tell me about the smaller goverment.
#63604 to #63603 - pebar (05/12/2014) [-]
Government is the authority that tells people what they can and cannot do and what they must do.
To an extent, this is a necessary component of society because people are inherently not nice to each other.
However, this power can get out of control very quickly. For example, the king can tax his citizens and leech off them. The king has the power to execute people on a whim. You must be very cautious how this power is used.

Voluntary action is the opposite of government. As a general rule, people should be allowed to decide for themselves how they live their lives.

Unless you believe in a totalitarian government that should tell its citizens when to eat, when to sleep, who to breed with, how to work, then you believe in some form of limited government. The question is how limited that government should be.

In my opinion, government should be very limited because the voluntary cooperation between many individuals is quite sufficient to develop a well-functioning society. On the social side of things, I believe people should mind their own business and that people should not be restricted from acting in such a way that does not harm anyone else.
#63606 to #63604 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
Official Call of Duty®: Advanced Warfare Reveal Trailer
I love this one.
#63605 to #63604 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
Fuck that shit, hail to the king.
So, you want Africa 2.0?
User avatar #63607 to #63605 - pebar (05/12/2014) [-]
Most countries in africa have large governments and they restrict free trade....
#63608 to #63607 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
It's not the size of the hammer.   
And I mean tribal warfare and everymanforhimself, no sense of unity, noone in control and complete and utter chaos.   
Show me where and when has a nation risen without an iron fist?
It's not the size of the hammer.
And I mean tribal warfare and everymanforhimself, no sense of unity, noone in control and complete and utter chaos.
Show me where and when has a nation risen without an iron fist?
User avatar #63609 to #63608 - pebar (05/12/2014) [-]
Milton Friedman - What is America? (Lecture) America, before the depression, before the government expanded to what we have now.
During the late 19th and early 20th century, America saw the greatest economic expansion the world had ever seen.
User avatar #63610 to #63609 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
The free market is cancer.
The Founding Fathers knew the market only "worked" for those with power. Alexander Hamilton established the American School of Economics based on anti-free trade principles to protect the emerging US economy from British industry,
The American School turned the US into an economic superpower. The US decline began with the adoption of neoliberal, free market, economics.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)
David Riccardo's argument for "comparative advantage" was blown out of the water by the Founding Father: Alexander Hamilton (he established the American School of Economics).
Hamilton recognized the US could not compete with British industry, so he sought to protect the US from free market competition.
I suggest you read "Report on Manufacturers".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report_on_Manufactures
The founding fathers knew free trade was cancer.
It stopped the US from having to trade in the open markets with British industry. British industry was founded on free market principles, the Founding Fathers knew they could NOT compete. The British economy would destroy US industry before it had a chance to establish itself. The US under the American School of Economics, was protectionist and interventionist.
>these three core policies:
>1. protecting industry through selective high tariffs (especially 1861–1932) and through subsidies (especially 1932–70)
>2. government investments in infrastructure creating targeted internal improvements (especially in transportation)
>3. a national bank with policies that promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_School_(economics)
The American School was anti-free trade.

This one below is from 4chin 2
User avatar #63614 to #63610 - pebar (05/12/2014) [-]
The founding fathers weren't economists and hardly knew anything about capitalism.
Adam Smith, basically the first economist, wrote The Wealth of Nations in 1776 which was arguably the foundation of capitalist thought.
The founders mean nothing to me; they just had a handful of good ideas.
#63615 to #63614 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
Y bring shame to yo famiry and they have no been fere market wizard nigga.
User avatar #63611 to #63610 - schnizel (05/12/2014) [-]
"Except that your scenario is dependent upon a "failing" human being voluntarily sinking and/or never taking responsibility for himself by using his natural talents to employ force against other human beings...which we all know is patently ridiculous. A starving man is just going to steal food.

Your counter-point to the above (say, people voluntarily paying for law enforcement to prevent getting robbed) is dependent upon people privately giving money to another person/groups of people to deal with/prevent this problem. Sure, you preserve the freedom not to pay for this service if you don't need it. Ok. So what happens when an unguarded homeowner is hopelessly outnumbered by hungry people who want his property? Are you really so arrogant to think that you could successfully defend your homestead against a dozen armed attackers?

You have, essentially, advocated the exact same system: needing to pay money so that you won't be killed in your bed by a hungry person. The only difference between you and a socialist is that the socialist wants to help people in need, whether through necessity or a sense of morality, while you actively wish savagery to be visited upon the people least able to survive it. The net cost will be the same...if it's not, living standards decrease and the population will shrink through attrition."
-Some anon
 Friends (0)