Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
0
#65043 - dubslao has deleted their comment [-]
0
#65039 - ribocoon has deleted their comment [-]
#65031 - anonymous (06/29/2014) [-]
www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/27/az-residents-at-chemtrail-hearing-were-being-sprayed-like-were-bugs-and-its-really-not-okay/

Arizona holds hearings over chemtrails.
Basically a bunch of scared old people screaming "google it!"
User avatar #65042 to #65031 - dubslao (06/30/2014) [-]
chemtrails are real
i read it on a facebook page that uses its own website as sources
User avatar #65038 to #65026 - byposted (06/30/2014) [-]
>MRAs
>anti-feminist

I used to believe, after becoming acquainted with MRA literature, that the disconnect between the sexes could be solved in a liberal manner - through the same sort of "mutual understanding" as touted in that content - before I widened my view and saw that the problem was a derivation of egalitarianism.

It is clear that reciprocating the destruction of femininity is not the answer. OP is a tranny wuss who should grow a pair.
User avatar #65047 to #65038 - Shiny (06/30/2014) [-]
Modern gender politics are so deeply embroiled in personal agendas that they no longer even have any particular idealistic leanings on the surface. The fact that the term "MRA" was coined when "masculist" already exists (and doesn't sound completely goddamn stupid) is an indicator of this; intentionally vague but catchy-sounding words that change definition on a whim.

I liked it better when kids at least pretended to understand things that actually mattered.
User avatar #65037 to #65026 - ablueguy (06/29/2014) [-]
Yes.
#65034 to #65026 - anonymous (06/29/2014) [-]
I think boys should be bullied for being weak/womanly
User avatar #65033 to #65026 - schnizel (06/29/2014) [-]
Yep.
User avatar #65027 to #65026 - pebar (06/29/2014) [-]
hardly
#65020 - youregaylol (06/29/2014) [-]
Despite my admiration of national socialism, and my belief that it would provide countless benefits to the world, I feel that in todays political climate it will never be applicable in its purest form. The world is to far gone and to susceptible to the powers that be.

I have always thought of national socialism as a sort of solution to societies problems, as opposed to a fervent belief system. If we can solve the problem of social decay, and combat the forces of marxism and corporate manipulation in a way that's possible in the current world, why wouldn't we pursue it.

I would imagine a system that while similar to the fascism that we know of, incorporates elements from the Roman Empire. Of course some things would remain the same. A strong executive body headed by a single powerful figure who embodies the state to it's greatest degree, a firm control of immigration and a suppression of destructive ideas, thats all a given.

But add into the equation a state guard that has one single purpose, to protect the ideology of the state, which will be manifested in an unalterable document that clearly outlines the beliefs of the state. This "constitutional" guard will also serve as the nations military. After all, it must be made clear that war is a manifestation of the beliefs of the people. The citizenry, if being of sound judgement and in accordance with the beliefs of the state, should police themselves through an armed peoples militia, with its members chosen by the community. This eliminates the threat of corporate police. To prevent corruption the people must be able to vote out those officials appointed by the head executive if they believe he is unfit.

The executive cannot be removed from power, but can be made powerless by the people if they continue to vote out his appointees. The citizenry should not be allowed to elect government officials, as this would make the state susceptible to profiteers and power mongers. In this way, merit decides the day.
#65022 to #65020 - anonymous (06/29/2014) [-]
Ha.
Ha.
#65023 to #65022 - youregaylol (06/29/2014) [-]
Hi valeriya
User avatar #65009 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Do you guys have a favourite political party? Tell also why, if you feel like it.
User avatar #65048 to #65009 - Shiny (06/30/2014) [-]
Not really, since they're either the big two, extremist seat-grabbers and regional parties nobody even acknowledges the existence of. I do like Greens that aren't eco-nuts, though.
User avatar #65028 to #65009 - schnizel (06/29/2014) [-]
Foam party
User avatar #65035 to #65028 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (06/29/2014) [-]
Doesn't sound very political, but it sounds pretty fun.
#65019 to #65009 - alimais (06/29/2014) [-]
Freedom Party Austria
Freiheitliche Partei Österreich
FPÖ

The party leader always posts interesting stuff on his account on Facebook
User avatar #65017 to #65009 - jadewest (06/29/2014) [-]
www.ldp.org.au/

these guys, they are neat
User avatar #65014 to #65009 - feelythefeel (06/29/2014) [-]
I don't know about foreign parties, but the ones we have are pretty shit (Our current administration has a strange fixation on banishing people at random).
#65011 to #65009 - greatphanacttwo (06/28/2014) [-]
I like the Farty Party.
#65007 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
If some is interested, I have a good political movie here.

We watch movies like this in our school
inside job.avi
User avatar #65005 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
This is much better. Thank you Alimais
User avatar #65006 to #65005 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
The problem is that there is low traffic here and there are mostly 2 parties interested in politics which are Libertarian & Nationalists

You see, it takes just one guy to improve this board but also only one guy can degrade it
#65002 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your stance on the Ukraine conflict ?
What's your stance on the Ukraine conflict ?

#65054 to #65002 - anonymous (06/30/2014) [-]
Don't know to be honest.   
   
Russia illigally invaded Crimea, and is funding a bloody insurgency in the east.   
   
But Ukraine is ok with Nazi militias, ethnic cleansing and medival justice.
Don't know to be honest.

Russia illigally invaded Crimea, and is funding a bloody insurgency in the east.

But Ukraine is ok with Nazi militias, ethnic cleansing and medival justice.
#64989 - anonymous (06/28/2014) [-]
Where do Libertarians and the Tea Party differ the most?
User avatar #64990 to #64989 - pebar (06/28/2014) [-]
Social issues.
Libertarians support things like gay marriage and ending the drug war, but the TEA party is more like die hard no-compromise republican. In general, TEA party people focus more on economic issues so it's not that big a deal, mostly because they strongly favor the constitution and states' rights, but if you ask them about social issues like gay marriage, they'll still oppose them.
User avatar #65003 to #64990 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
I like them more than republicans however.
#64977 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your stance on GMO's ?
#64991 to #64977 - pebar (06/28/2014) [-]
Scientists and farmers have been modifying the genes of their crops for hundreds of years. You will not find a commercial crop that is purely natural. If you're specifically talking about the cutting and pasting of genes from one organism to another, I wouldn't worry about it because all the research, even by independent groups, says it's safe.   
   
The potential for mass production (cheap food for everyone) far outweighs the bad, especially when the bad is completely over exaggerated.
Scientists and farmers have been modifying the genes of their crops for hundreds of years. You will not find a commercial crop that is purely natural. If you're specifically talking about the cutting and pasting of genes from one organism to another, I wouldn't worry about it because all the research, even by independent groups, says it's safe.

The potential for mass production (cheap food for everyone) far outweighs the bad, especially when the bad is completely over exaggerated.
User avatar #65125 to #64991 - drastronomy ONLINE (07/01/2014) [-]
i have a little bit of info here:

making more effective plants and crops=more production of the crop thats modified. This contributes to lower biological diversity due to the nature of gene manipulation - lower biological diversity= more in danger of bacteria, parasites, etc. - this means a type of bacteria could lay waste so extreme amounts of food, whereas unmodified food would still have a large enough biological diversity to lower the damages.
#64992 to #64991 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
There are different methods of genetically modifying food like crossing, mutating, recombination and more.

If they are healthy can be debated for hours so there is that.

The specific part what annoys me is the patent part on those seeds
www.techdirt.com/articles/20121229/03344321523/main-problem-with-patented-gm-food-is-patent-not-fact-that-its-gm.shtml

>pic is genetically modified mice
User avatar #65004 to #64992 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
I think the patent should only cover the manufacturing of the seeds and not the use of them.
#64996 to #64992 - pebar (06/28/2014) [-]
Monopolies suck
Monopolies suck
User avatar #64985 to #64977 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
They're a little necessary, we just have to make sure we make them less harmful in certain aspects.
User avatar #64988 to #64985 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
If they are healthy or not can be discussed but the system about nature with patent is outright sick. There should be no patent on those GMO seeds
User avatar #64994 to #64988 - akkere ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
It could be argued that GMOs aren't exactly a product of nature, but a design of a laboratory, and therefore should be treated as such and not in any way natural.

That being said, GMOs aren't exactly your usual laboratory invention so there should be a different set of guidelines for patenting the specific product. This mostly being due to the fact that by nature this product may inevitably end up in the crop of an unsuspecting farmer, who may then find himself dragged into a lawsuit from a company like Monsanto.

So technically, speaking, there shouldn't be any patent on the GMO seeds with patents in their current system, but a form of copyright ownership should be placed on them in a manner of any form of unique design should be claimed ownership by its creator.
#64969 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your stance on this ?
For me it's just more fuel into a already big fire

news.yahoo.com/obama-seeks-500-million-congress-help-moderate-syrian-193135415.html
www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-seeks-500-million-to-train-equip-syrian-rebels/

I'm kinda annoyed because some idiot always removes the notion about Al-Qaeda in the opposition column of this wiki article
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_groups_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War
User avatar #65012 to #64969 - byposted (06/28/2014) [-]
Have you considered that an expansion of the fire is intended? The CIA, having been involved in insurgent Syrian cells since the 1990s, is hardly stirred by its eastward spread.

The objective is well worth offending the sensibilities of "Bible-clinging" veterans: Ensure that Damascus, even if it remains steadfast under Assad the son, will never fully recover from the damage dealt.

Such gives Israel and its colony in the Pentagon more agency than it ever had before. Lebanon, in particular, will be open for grabs in the coming decade. I am just thrilled to see what Shillary Clinton will spearhead, if elected.

-
Don't call the perpetrator behind the Wikipedia edits an "idiot"; he has a clear agenda. Anyway, I don't understand the purpose behind the ISIL having a separate column on the chart. I could find it out by viewing the talk page but, considering all this talk about edits, I would prefer to avoid the shitstorm.
User avatar #65018 to #65012 - alimais (06/29/2014) [-]
I know that,
User avatar #64974 to #64969 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
We can't get involved in another war with so many real problems we have here.
User avatar #64976 to #64974 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Yes, but with that they lay the seeds for the next conflict to come and like in Iraq I think the US should reap what they sow
User avatar #64978 to #64976 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Their problem not ours
User avatar #64979 to #64978 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
You can't just tip over someones glass and say "wipe it up yourself ! your problem not mine"
User avatar #64980 to #64979 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
so we act and tip over more glasses?
#64981 to #64980 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
There was a whole jug already tipped over by removing Hussein.

Let me remind you about the time the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan got aid worth 45$ Billion then you suddenly got the "Islamic State of Afghanistan" the original name was Democratic Republic of Afghanistan where women had rights and looked pretty western & Al-Qaeda was created and finally some phony towers got removed from New York.
User avatar #64982 to #64981 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Again would creating a more bigger problem be worth it?
User avatar #64986 to #64982 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
By removing ISIS who are outright massmurders worse than any Hollywood Nazis would be worth it because they also seek to get influence in Western countries so they should be put down before they get to be a much bigger problem.

Also by supporting "rebels" in Syria the US already tipped over a fuck ton of glasses.
User avatar #64995 to #64986 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
That's whole another pile of shit.
#64997 to #64995 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Here is the map they have in mind for their Islamic state
User avatar #64998 to #64997 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
I'd rather Europe take care of it.
User avatar #64999 to #64998 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
I'd rather have NATO taking care of it.
User avatar #65000 to #64999 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Hopefully.
User avatar #65001 to #65000 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Which brings me to my next thread, I'm going to do now
#64953 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your stance on Monsanto or stuff like Aspartame ?
User avatar #64965 to #64953 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Monsanto is only able to get away with shit because the government enforces their patents.
#64967 to #64965 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Pink bubble is obligatory
User avatar #64975 to #64967 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Corruption is the response of government expanding powers
#64952 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What's your stance on Cannabis ?
User avatar #64966 to #64952 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
It should be legalized in the interest of civil liberty and economic liberty. The war on rugs has proven far too costly in upfront costs indirect costs and the cost of liberty.
User avatar #65015 to #64966 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/29/2014) [-]
i love u, im glad ur back
User avatar #65016 to #65015 - undeadwill (06/29/2014) [-]
Me too.. Me too. Tumblr can burn.
User avatar #65097 to #65052 - undeadwill (07/01/2014) [-]
fucking tumblr man..
#64960 to #64952 - pebar (06/28/2014) [-]
Legalize all of it. Meth, heroin, everything.
If the government shut down Coca-Cola, Pepsi's profits would skyrocket ignoring antitrust laws
It's the same when government doesn't allow pharmaceutical companies to produce drugs. Gangs and drug cartels' profits skyrocket.
You could reduce A LOT of crime by cutting off their source of income.

Furthermore, our prisons are packed full of non-violent drug offenders, a lot of them are in for life due to minimum sentencing. The local paper here releases a list every couple months of the recent felonies in the area. Around 90% of them are drug possession.
Police actually get a lot of their income from confiscating other people's stuff related to drug crime. For example, the police can take your house if you sell a few ounces of weed on your front doorstep. That is just wrong IMO.

You cannot defeat the powers of the market. The more drug dealers you arrest, the less competition and supply you have, then you increase the price which increases the profitability of drug dealing, which then encourages more people to sell drugs.
User avatar #64951 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
thoughts on gun rights?
User avatar #64954 to #64951 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
They drastically lower the crime rate and statistically they safe MUCH more people per year than people kill.
User avatar #64955 to #64954 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Would you be willing to allow military grade weapons into private hands?
User avatar #64956 to #64955 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
What do you consider as military grade weapons ?
User avatar #64959 to #64956 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
The same small arms the military uses
User avatar #64968 to #64959 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Rifles & small arms are fine by me because if you happen to do a crime with a LEGALLY bought weapon it can be back-traced to you.
User avatar #64984 to #64968 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
What about a heavy full auto machine gun?
User avatar #64987 to #64984 - teranin ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
A heavy full auto machine gun is impractical for criminal use, and at current in the USA it requires some significant licensing to purchase. In the USA you can privately own a tank, here's a cool place where you can buy them www.mortarinvestments.eu/products/tanks-2/t-34-35

I really want 44 grand to get my own T-34
User avatar #64993 to #64987 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Same.
User avatar #64940 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Can the Nazis talk for a moment about anything other than the Jews? I mean you can keep talking about them but if that's the ONLY thing you really discuss that's sad
User avatar #64941 to #64940 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Focus or talk on anything other than racial issues please.
User avatar #64948 to #64941 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
Racial & Cultural issues are political issues because they affect society after all but if you want to talk about something then start.
User avatar #64949 to #64948 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
You guys only want to talk about that which annoys me. I can't be the one to require that of you you have to do it yourself.
User avatar #64950 to #64949 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
We don't want, we just do and mostly this stuff gets left out in every correct political discussion.

Just for you I'll start a thread without racial issues
User avatar #64921 - undeadwill (06/27/2014) [-]
Things were better on this board before the Neo nazis took over.
User avatar #64934 to #64921 - akkere ONLINE (06/28/2014) [-]
Maybe we'll get another political invasion from some other group to help balance it out.
Like, The New Zeleandic Sheep Lover Party members. Actually, scratch that, we already have a furry board.
#64931 to #64921 - youregaylol (06/28/2014) [-]
And thats "whining about board contents" comment 93,500,629.
User avatar #64938 to #64931 - undeadwill (06/28/2014) [-]
Maybe because the board sucks now.
#64943 to #64938 - youregaylol (06/28/2014) [-]
Maybe it's just you.
#64923 to #64921 - anonymous (06/28/2014) [-]
FAT BEN MADE POOP
#64903 - alimais (06/27/2014) [-]
What's the difference between a cow and the holocaust?    
   
Jews can't milk a cow for 60 years.
What's the difference between a cow and the holocaust?

Jews can't milk a cow for 60 years.
#64925 to #64903 - greatphanacttwo (06/28/2014) [-]
What's the difference between fresh air and fart?
#64926 to #64925 - greatphanacttwo (06/28/2014) [-]
*prrrrrrrrrrrp*

Nothing! They're the same damn thing to me!
#64922 to #64903 - anonymous (06/27/2014) [-]
DAE Joos talk about the Holohoax too much???????

HUEHUEHUE comedy gold.
#64902 - youregaylol (06/27/2014) [-]
BIG FAT GYPSIES BEING EVICTED, TEMPERS GET RAISED, BULLDOZER MOVES IN. Skip to 6:28, unless you want to see some gypsies whining in large numbers.

Here you can see the lower classes ( from a social standpoint, although it's likely their poverty is intertwined into their culture ) exploitation of the peoples morality. The standing authority in the situation gives the gypsy woman many opportunities to remove her gypsy spawn from the trailer. The gypsy woman, with no regard for her family, refuses in an attempt to hold the authority hostage. This is a tactic used by many parasites. Take the american welfare system. A negroid woman will attempt to put the burden of her poor life choices on the state, who out of misguided morality will allow her to exploit them.

The state must adopt a universal morality for the people, which strengthens the willpower and resolve of the citizenry, and is resilient to the artificial ethics propagated by marxists.
 Friends (0)