Latest users (4): drastronomy, isabelleac, jewishcommunazi, schnizel, anonymous(21).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#81020 - youregaylol (03/21/2015) [-]
So heres a new one   
What do you guys think of the Special Olympics?   
I just recently moonlighted as one of the standing LP's at their local figure skating event.   
On one hand it was nice to see them participating and happy, but on another hand it almost felt like a zoo. Their parents/coaches were acting like animal tamers and guided their every move, save when they started to perform.   
I understand logically these people have the mental capacities of children, and sometimes even less, but it just feels demoralizing to me.
So heres a new one

What do you guys think of the Special Olympics?

I just recently moonlighted as one of the standing LP's at their local figure skating event.

On one hand it was nice to see them participating and happy, but on another hand it almost felt like a zoo. Their parents/coaches were acting like animal tamers and guided their every move, save when they started to perform.

I understand logically these people have the mental capacities of children, and sometimes even less, but it just feels demoralizing to me.
#81072 to #81020 - anon (03/22/2015) [-]
In Nazi Germany the mentally handicapped were executed.
User avatar #81081 to #81072 - youregaylol (03/22/2015) [-]
They were killed in Sparta as well.

Different times, different circumstances.
#81007 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]

Conservative Correctness in action.
User avatar #81018 to #81007 - youregaylol (03/21/2015) [-]
When african children were forced to speak in foreign languages in schools it was colonialism and cultural suppression.
#81033 to #81018 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
Because the goal was to wipe out the local language.
User avatar #81043 to #81038 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
Most of those are actually valid points of some hypocritical statements made by some far right people on this board, I agree to an extent for sure.
User avatar #81039 to #81038 - youregaylol (03/21/2015) [-]
we know its you
User avatar #81021 to #81018 - thekame ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
>Complaints were received from people who lost family in Afghanistan
User avatar #81034 to #81021 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
It's not even about that, I just don't like this multiculturalism garbage. It's god damn America, you speak American English, you assimilate here. God this stupid lib shit annoys me.
#81074 to #81034 - anon (03/22/2015) [-]
America is a multicultural society.
#81040 to #81034 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
"Officials said the school's foreign language department organised for different pledge translations to be read in celebration of National Foreign Language Week."
User avatar #81044 to #81040 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
>National Foreign Language Week
Exactly, this multiculturalism garbage.
#81053 to #81044 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
Sounds more like an attempt to get children interested in learning a foreign language. Which is a useful skill.
User avatar #81017 to #81007 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
>conservative correctness

Kek, none such exists. It's called reality you stupid hippie fagget.
#81037 to #81017 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
Torture = Enhanced interrogation
French fries = Freedom fries
Welfare queen= Minority woman
Pro-Family= Anti-gay

Trying to re-brand attempts to introduce creationism into school curriculum as "teach the controversy".

Changing the names of committees in the House of Representatives by substituting the commie word "labor" for the more neutral "workforce".
User avatar #81041 to #81037 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
You know I spent time trying to go through one by one and explain how it isn't correctness but I just can't lie. I guess this type of "we don't like the way you are" mentality exists on the right too, I wouldn't exactly call it Conservative Correctness but I see where your coming from. I am for the traditional nuclear family culture and not the swaying degeneracy that is increasing in the West, am I on the opposite side of political correctness by wanting to silence degeneracy? Maybe, but I'm right though. And an eye for an eye.

User avatar #81045 to #81041 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
BTW I was specifically referring to the Pro family points and just that whole idea, some of the other ones are stupid.
User avatar #81042 to #81041 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
wtf why is there so much space
#81075 to #81042 - anon (03/22/2015) [-]
You have autism kike.
User avatar #81014 to #81007 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
It wouldn't make sense even if they were at war with an Arabic nation and they aren't even that!
#81012 to #81007 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
In murrica we speak murrican.
User avatar #81010 to #81007 - schnizel ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
That's common sense.
User avatar #80981 - feelythefeel (03/21/2015) [-]
What happened to that senate idea? I really liked it.
User avatar #81004 to #80981 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
But i'll try to make the rules and idea's for now.
User avatar #81003 to #80981 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
I don't really have the time to put it together at the moment.
User avatar #80990 to #80981 - youregaylol (03/21/2015) [-]
#80993 to #80990 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
we need to make some political parties
Nat Soc maybe 2 types, one more extreme that wants to kill all joos and one less severe
Libertarian/economic liberalism
Democratic Socialism

please comment people on what types we should have and then we will go about actually seeing what they believe in/run on
User avatar #81109 to #80993 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (03/22/2015) [-]
Because we don't have that many people here, I'd say only one Nat Soc, merge democratic socialism with labour because it's usually pretty much the same and maybe merge conservative-esq with economic liberalism.
User avatar #81060 to #80993 - feelythefeel (03/22/2015) [-]
I'm all for making a nat soc party.
User avatar #80999 to #80993 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
Maybe we should have an Anarchist movement as well. We'd need an anarchist to represent it though.
User avatar #81019 to #80999 - youregaylol (03/21/2015) [-]
lol u dumb
User avatar #81015 to #80999 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
kek no
#80956 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Wow, I am pretty proud of myself to be honest. I didn't force this outcome or anything, I answered the questions honestly, especially looking at the difference between strongly and non-strongly which I find to be an important part of the test.
User avatar #81008 to #80956 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
Doesn't that put you pretty close to the mainstream?
User avatar #81027 to #81008 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
No. My real views are definitely not mainstream...
User avatar #81024 to #81008 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
The goal isn't to be not mainstream, you hipster faggot.
It's to have the right answers
User avatar #81029 to #81024 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
I've never seen you curse at someone like that :^ )
*insert le frea merket jok*
User avatar #81028 to #81024 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
I'm aware. Lulz has just projected a far-right point of view a lot.
User avatar #81030 to #81028 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
And that's mainstream? Nationalism and more free market is mainstream? Nah mate.
User avatar #81032 to #81030 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
No that's not mainstream, but your current position on the political compass apparently puts you pretty close to a lot of mainstream politicians around the world.

User avatar #81036 to #81032 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
We all know that's complete BS. I've seen this stupid compass put the UKIP party all the way to the far top of the blue part, like 2 points off the edge.

And just looking at this compass and were it places all the Canadian parties, you literally could not be more wrong if you tried.

>green party is in the middle
>cons and libs are hitler
Orbital sides.
#81002 to #80956 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
tfw I'm not even as fascist as I thought I was ;_;
User avatar #80996 to #80956 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
so are you a neocon then?
User avatar #81016 to #80996 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
A le what?
User avatar #81023 to #81016 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
a warmongering, socially-controlling, hypocritical republican
User avatar #81025 to #81023 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
Well I see with what your going in but could you maybe delve in more? You should know my views on things by now I'd think. I'm a nationalist, conservative and pro-capitalist all mixed together. I don't know if that makes me a neo-con.
User avatar #81026 to #81025 - lulzforgaza (03/21/2015) [-]
*****going at
#80958 to #80956 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
For those of you who have been here long enough to remember what I first got. This is basically my evolution in political thought.

Don't worry, I'll try not to go capitalist Hitler on you guys.
User avatar #80957 to #80956 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
knew you werent purple you nigger
User avatar #80959 to #80957 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Yeah I know, I don't really care to be. I'm pro-capitalist but too conservative to be on the purple.
User avatar #80962 to #80959 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
>was green when first came here
>angry at greens who first come here

ok lol

so what about...idk, what else was on the test...

i remember a few questions about art, race, quite a lot about religion

give me your opinion rundown
User avatar #80963 to #80962 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Ask me anything and I will tell you what I answered.
User avatar #80964 to #80963 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
if we had time and patience id go through each question, im genuinely curious how you get such different placements based on that simple test

to simplify it

what do you think about
-corporations, are their interests more important than those of the people, religions or nations?
-superiority of certain races
-"Military action that defies international law is sometimes justified"
-rich taxes
-death penalty
-abstract art and art in general
-"you cannot be moral without being religious"
-how far on LGBT scale are you (where do you draw the line, gay marriage, adoption etc.)

there are so many statements in this test id like to discuss with someone on the opposite side of the compass but these will have to do for now

probably wont be able to reply until tomorrow

User avatar #80977 to #80964 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
Buildings don't have interests; people have interest. Corporations are made up of people. An easy way to think about that is to say I care about my interests more than I care about your interests. This is the way the world works. I care more about my steaks being too dry than I care about some children starving in Africa. Saying you dislike corporations shifts you left because you do not understand that capitalism takes this "corporate greed" and turns it into something productive.

>rich taxes
one of the reasons people think the rich are too highly taxed is because they believe they arrange their finances in such a way that exempts them from certain taxes. People are that if you lower the tax rate, you can encourage people to not use these exemptions and you can end up collecting more tax revenue.

>abstract art
I think there was a Q&A on the website about this. If you say it shouldn't be art, it makes you more authoritarian because you think you have a right to tell people what they can and cannot do, or something like that.
User avatar #80982 to #80977 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
I do not dislike corporations and agree with what you said, that can't be the thing leaning me left.

the taxes one is too much speculation. as if rich people wouldnt still use the tax exempting tactics even if there are smaller taxes. with higher taxes you can at least be sure of a tangibly bigger tax revenue, at least in the short run.
also, you could make the taxes somewhere in between higher and lower but pass new regulations that make finance arranging illegal or much harder to do.

i wasnt aiming to see if you think abstract art is art, just if you think about the position of abstract and any other art in modern society.
some say its useless and should not be taught in schools and should be repressed in favor of more practical skills and studies, since it has no application in the real world
User avatar #80985 to #80982 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
"If economic globalization is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
Globalization promotes most unrestricted free international trade. Trade inherently benefits the traders involved. If you try to make it serve humanity, then you will likely end up restricting trade and making people worse off. If you agree with the question, you are left.

""from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is a fundamentally good idea"
This is a direct quote from Marx I believe. If you agree, you are left.

"It's a sad reflection on our society that something as basic as drinking water is now a bottled, branded consumer product."
Consumers buy want they buy because they want the item. If you think think you should have control over what people can and cannot buy, then are you more left.

"Land shouldn't be a commodity to be bought and sold."
The economy is heavily based on trading private property. if you oppose trade, then you will lean left.

"The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders."
The idea behind this statement if companies have a moral obligation to serve people outside the company, then people outside the company have a claim on what people can and cannot do with their stuff. The weakens property rights and leads down the path to socialism and the destruction of society.
This is based on an article by Milton Friedman, one of the most influential economists in the last century. If you disagree with the statement, you are left.

to name a few....
User avatar #80971 to #80964 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Some good questions, I'll probably answer later since I don't feel too much like it now.
#81161 to #80971 - slightly (03/22/2015) [-]
you have time to thumb down entire board pages and yet not enough time to respond
User avatar #80973 to #80971 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
fair enough
User avatar #80960 to #80959 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
or to nationalistic you could say.
User avatar #80933 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
Anyone have any strong opinions on nuclear power?
User avatar #81005 to #80933 - radiserne (03/21/2015) [-]
I'd rather pay more for energy and have it non-nuclear. Yes, the chances for a environmental catastrophe are minuscule, but regardless still there. Just look at Fukushima. Just think of the impact if all that radiation had made Tokyo uninhabitable.
But I agree with pebar that fusion is the future of energy.
User avatar #80976 to #80933 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
Fusion will be one of the greenest and most efficient energy sources once it's figured out.
Fission, what we have now, is still more or less good for the environment as long as necessary safety is taken care of and waste is disposed of properly.

It is way more of a realistic alternative than solar or wind.
User avatar #80936 to #80933 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Why not?

Environmental energy could be the future but its not nearly efficient enough right now and requires more research and funding.
#80923 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
I feel I've made some good progress since the last time i took this; My goal is to be dead center in the middle, and some to the right if need be.
#81073 to #80994 - pebar ONLINE (03/22/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #81000 to #80994 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
You're very strict!
#80934 to #80923 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
I really thought I would be more toward the right than that! I am quite libertarian though.
Do you think answers would change if you had been drinking?
User avatar #80937 to #80934 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Jesus christ I am disappointed in you...
User avatar #80940 to #80937 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
For drinking?
User avatar #80941 to #80940 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
obviously not, for your wrong answers.
User avatar #80949 to #80941 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
Theres not really wrong answers to these questions
#80979 to #80949 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
when you answers can result in the deaths of millions of people, they are wrong
User avatar #81001 to #80979 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
Also, how many Libertarian regimes do you think have killed lots of their people?
User avatar #80998 to #80979 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
I doubt my answers to this poll will have such far-reaching consequences.
#80989 to #80979 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
Christianity is wrong?
User avatar #80995 to #80989 - cabbagemayhem (03/21/2015) [-]
He said "deaths of millions of people", not "salvation of millions of people"
User avatar #80945 to #80941 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
I don't think I'm really that far left though
User avatar #80968 to #80945 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
What kinds of questions do you think shifted you that far left?
User avatar #80997 to #80968 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
I think I probably agreed on some of the economic questions which would put me to the Left but I didn't strongly agree.
User avatar #80931 to #80923 - cabbagemayhem (03/20/2015) [-]
If you're in the center you're only half-right. One side is based on rarely understood knowledge and history, the other side is based on hunches and common ignorance. On the other axis, one side is based on the belief that people are generally good and the desire to make one's own choices, and the other side is based on the belief that people are naturally bad and the desire to control them.
User avatar #80980 to #80931 - akkere (03/21/2015) [-]
Why exactly would one want to stray closer to one side than the other? Authoritarianism for instance has the somewhat peculiar idea of humans being bad so they should be controlled by humans somehow deemed "good" to the extreme, but from a lighter perspective you have standard laws and principle that, if balanced with the opposing axis, can have fair judgment done by the people such as trials by jury and the like.
#80984 to #80980 - cabbagemayhem (03/21/2015) [-]
That's why rational Libertarians like Milton Friedman appear only slightly Libertarian on the scale. Rule and order are an important part of that axis that I left out in my initial description.
EDIT: Fixed image
User avatar #80986 to #80984 - akkere (03/21/2015) [-]
In terms of the authoriatarian+libertarian axis, he seems to be pretty close enough to center. What factors drives him to the right, his specific economic policy?
#80991 to #80986 - cabbagemayhem (03/21/2015) [-]
Like I said, there are two factors that play into the Libertarian/Authoritarian scale, so it appears center, but it is really the mashing of two different ideas. What puts him on the right is his apparent lack of ignorance: a well-thought-out economic philosophy, and the realization that people do better unequally in freedom than equally in slavery.
User avatar #81006 to #80991 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
Being on the left does not mean you're ignorant.
User avatar #81009 to #81006 - cabbagemayhem (03/21/2015) [-]
You're right. It could just mean you have more heart than experience, or that you have a plenty of knowledge and just hate people. I'm sorry, I don't usually like to speak in extremes, but there's just no justifying collectivism. It's the bane of humanity.
User avatar #81013 to #81009 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
It works in kibbutz though and in cooperative societies. I think the problem is with authoritarianism rather than collectivism.
#81049 to #81013 - cabbagemayhem (03/21/2015) [-]
Now let me be clear, collectivism can work well in small, moral, homogenous communities. I'm only referring to its implementation on a national scale. Such systems rely on force and must be authoritarian, but that's not the only reason it doesn't work. It cannot solve the fundamental economic problem efficiently and distribute limited goods where they are most needed, because no one can spend your money for you better than you can, and no one knows your needs and values better than you.
#80983 to #80980 - cabbagemayhem has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #80938 to #80931 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Kinda agree. I'm going to make a post about nationalism and controlling later on today I think.
#80928 to #80923 - slightly (03/20/2015) [-]
damn...thats much more left than i thought...
User avatar #80970 to #80928 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
were you expecting to be more to the right?
User avatar #80972 to #80970 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
much more to the center, yes
User avatar #80974 to #80972 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
and why were you expecting that?
User avatar #80975 to #80974 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
i dont like to be associated with leftists, a lot of them are tards

guess i have no choice now
User avatar #80978 to #80975 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
A lot of them are tards because they do not understand capitalism. There are many questions that can shift you left if you choose based on "people should be nice to each other" instead of basing it on reality.
User avatar #80939 to #80928 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
Please die.
#80944 to #80939 - slightly has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #80942 to #80939 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
at least im not in purple field
User avatar #80967 to #80966 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
User avatar #80943 to #80942 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
You know what... just stop talking. Jesus christ you sound even more stupid.
User avatar #80947 to #80943 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
bet you didnt even solve the test

if you did post results ya pussy
User avatar #80950 to #80947 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
I've been a regular on this board for like 2 years now. I've done the test around a dozen times... I can do it again if you want.
User avatar #80953 to #80950 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
or just post the last one if you have it in one of your alt's recent pictures
User avatar #80952 to #80950 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
alright fine, if you feel like it do it

i just dont get how anyone can get right-sided answers from that test
User avatar #80946 to #80943 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
nice argumentation
User avatar #80948 to #80946 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
If you think the purple section is the worst one there is not even a point. Just don't come back to this board newfag.
User avatar #80951 to #80948 - slightly (03/21/2015) [-]
yeah no

this is a board for political discussion

if you dont have anyone to argue against then its just a huge circlejerk
#80924 to #80923 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
#80932 to #80924 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
I'm not sure that I'm really this economically left.
User avatar #80969 to #80932 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
what questions do you think shifted you that far left?
User avatar #80987 to #80969 - mixednuts (03/21/2015) [-]
Probably strongly agreeing with statements like "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."
User avatar #80988 to #80987 - pebar ONLINE (03/21/2015) [-]
they have an faq on it
#80927 to #80924 - pebar ONLINE (03/20/2015) [-]
>>#80923, Don't set a goal of where you want to be...... that skews your results.
Be honest with your answers.
Learn about the world.
#80992 to #80927 - anon (03/21/2015) [-]
but i was honest
#80961 to #80927 - lulzforsyria (03/21/2015) [-]
tfw more capitalist then pebar
#80907 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
Tomorrow the Danes commemorate the 70th year of the britbongs bombing of the Institut Jeanne d'Arc, also known as the French School in Copenhagen, during WW2. The school, run by nuns, housed around 500 children, many of them orphans who lived in the school.
On March 21st, the britbongs conducted Operation Carthage, a bombing raid with the sole objective to destroy the Gestapo HQ called "Shellhuset" . For reasons unknown, several britbong bombers mistook The French School for Shellhuset (the two buildings looked nothing like each other, and there were several kilometers between them). During the next 10 minutes, several firebombs were dropped on the school.
.250 people were killed, most of them children, and thousands were left without homes. Almost all the children that managed to survive developed PSTD later in life, and it remained the greatest civil catastrophe in Danish history until the Schengen-agreement.
Why the britbongs mistook children and nuns for nazis is still unknown to this day.
#80930 to #80907 - valeriya (03/20/2015) [-]
Today I learned that people die.
User avatar #80915 to #80907 - marinepenguin (03/20/2015) [-]
War is always going to yield unwanted casualties on both sides. That's inevitable.

Plus, British planes bombed at night, and unwanted targets were constantly hit.
User avatar #80916 to #80915 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
This was during the day.
User avatar #80917 to #80916 - marinepenguin (03/20/2015) [-]
Still changes nothing. With the way that things like this usually worked out in WW2, bombing the wrong targets on accident was common. American bombers, which also bombed during the day, would drop their bombs if they came under too much fire and thought the plane was going to go down, regardless of where their bombs were supposed to land.

Implying that there aren't going to be unintended casualties in a total war such as WW2 is simply fiction.

I can almost garuntee you that neither the British command, nor the bombing crews, intended to fire bomb a building of orphans.
User avatar #80918 to #80917 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
Lets look at the facts:
- It was daylight, no clouds.
- The french school was about 3 km away from Gestapo HQ.
- There were kids outside going to and from the school.
- It's placed one of the widest streets in Copenhagen. Shellhuset was known for being placed at a very dense place.
- The two buildings looked absolutely nothing like each other.

There's legitimate mistakes, and then there's pure retardation.
Furthermore, there was never really "war" in Denmark, since we were occupied throughout the war. Britbong bomb raids were not common here. And one of the very few bomb raids they actually make only manages to kill 250 innocent people.
User avatar #80920 to #80918 - marinepenguin (03/20/2015) [-]
Then also realise that you are in a steel plane about 15,000 feet up and are relying on very primitive sighting technology. 3km at that height is about 6 inches. If you aren't right over the target, you probably aren't going to hit it. That's exactly why firebombing became a tactic, more damage on the target and less need for a direct hit. Same reason why we sent 150 bombers for a handful of targets, massed bombing raids.

You'd also be completely unable to tell there were children on the ground.

You clearly have no idea how WW2 of bombing tactics and circumstances the crew had to deal with. A 3km distance between targets is literally nothing. Bombers would sometimes level the wrong town entirely because they went off course. It's war. War is hell, get used to the idea.
User avatar #80921 to #80920 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
Its you, not me, who doesn't have a clue. You see, they were supposed to make a very strategic bombing, since Gestapo had taken prisoners and placed them in Shellhuset, so the British wouldn't bomb them. This meant that the British bombers were supposed to hit the the building from the side, so they didn't kill the prisoners who were on the top floor.
Interviews with surviving pilots from the raid, who did manage to hit the right house, said they didn't understand why their colleagues had hit the french school, since:
1: it was so far away from target
2: they should have been able to see the children on the ground, SINCE they flew in LOW altitude to avoid German radar (this was 1945, so they did have radar).
User avatar #80922 to #80921 - marinepenguin (03/20/2015) [-]
Then that's a very different story. I was under the idea that this was your standard bombing raid. Not a special mission with different bombing parameters.

Regardless, it was still extremely likely to be a terrible mistake, and nothing more. Everything is easy in hindsight.
User avatar #80919 to #80918 - britbong (03/20/2015) [-]
Mistakes happen, they were only 3 km off after probably travelling more than a few hundred. This was world war 2, no satellite navigation or laser guided missiles, only dumb bombs and physical maps.
#80926 to #80919 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
#80900 - liberalgodess (03/20/2015) [-]
Why do anti-feminists bitch about the draft when there's no chance of it happening?
Why do anti-feminists bitch about the draft when there's no chance of it happening?
#80909 to #80900 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#80904 to #80900 - cabbagemayhem (03/20/2015) [-]
The draft doesn't exist anymore just like World Wars don't exist anymore: we haven't had one in a long time, and hopefully we never do, but getting complacent about it is a horrible fucking plan.
The draft doesn't exist anymore just like World Wars don't exist anymore: we haven't had one in a long time, and hopefully we never do, but getting complacent about it is a horrible fucking plan.
User avatar #80901 to #80900 - redandgreen (03/20/2015) [-]
Because it still exists in a lot of Western countries and some have reintroduced it, like Ukraine and Lithuania.
User avatar #80929 to #80901 - valeriya (03/20/2015) [-]
Ukraine and western, really shouldn't be in the same category, we don't even share an alphabet yet alone values and culture.
User avatar #80935 to #80929 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
There's still lots of other countries with cpnscription though
User avatar #80954 to #80935 - valeriya (03/21/2015) [-]
True. Nothing inherently wrong with conscription, just be prepared to bury a lot of people. Still on the Ukraine note not western
User avatar #80955 to #80954 - redandgreen (03/21/2015) [-]
I didn't say anything about whether I though it was good or bad
User avatar #80892 - lulzforcrimea (03/20/2015) [-]
I got banned for launching crusades so this is my new account If you are suspicious which you should be then www.funnyjunk.com/user/lulzformalaysiaair proof here
#80895 to #80892 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
tfw crimea
#80886 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
muh redpill
User avatar #80914 to #80886 - mixednuts (03/20/2015) [-]
Wasn't this Muhammad Ali when he was still in the Nation of Islam?
#80880 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]

ITT: We discuss what this evil white devil must have done to force these historically oppressed young man to murder him in cold blood as he took his dog out for a walk.
User avatar #80902 to #80878 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
That's about the fastest broken promise from a politician I've ever seen. Good luck Netanyoyo, palestinians is such a tolerating people and history doesn't have any value.
User avatar #80890 to #80878 - lulzforcrimea (03/20/2015) [-]
Fuck a 2 state solution. I honestly couldn't care what happens there.

Gaza is like Africa to me, I don't care, I don't value their lives. It would be hypocritical of me otherwise and I find it pretty ironic how others do.
User avatar #80891 to #80890 - PopcornViking (03/20/2015) [-]
i would be fine with it but only after we killed all of hamas
User avatar #80879 to #80878 - PopcornViking (03/19/2015) [-]
Netanyahu now wants a 2 state solution
User avatar #80864 - redandgreen (03/19/2015) [-]
Feminist Arrested After Being Attacked By Group of Men

Honestly, I cannot wait to see what some of you say about this!! Enjoy!!
#80903 to #80864 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
**radiserne used "*roll picture*"**
**radiserne rolled image**
Again proving the thesis that the feminist hate towards men comes from their lack of intercourse, produced by their ugliness and uncharming behaviour. Her approaching 4 black men and telling them that they're rapists is actually a small plea to them to fuck her.
User avatar #80910 to #80903 - redandgreen (03/20/2015) [-]
Well, I don't agree with that. She was trying to start a fight though.
User avatar #80913 to #80910 - radiserne (03/20/2015) [-]
Then explain why 90% of feminists are unattractive
#80882 to #80864 - akkere (03/20/2015) [-]
"I'm a victim" "I'm a victim-er" "I'm the victimest" "I'm the victimestest"
It would've been better if both were detained for the escalation, but I'm guessing the officers didn't feel like getting caught in a major controversy regarding a large arrest, especially when part of the group holds such shining silver tongues.
User avatar #80897 to #80882 - redandgreen (03/20/2015) [-]
It's crazy isn't it. Neither the group of men nor the woman came across as exactly sane. She did seem to be harassing them though.
I'm guessing they probably didn't charge her as it isn't worth the trouble but just got her out the situation.
User avatar #80873 to #80864 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]

IDK what is going on tbh
User avatar #80898 to #80873 - redandgreen (03/20/2015) [-]
Angry, crazy men and angry, crazy feminist woman.
User avatar #80874 to #80873 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
>dat ending

Funny video, guys obviously lied but whatever. Douchebags exist everywhere.
User avatar #80899 to #80874 - redandgreen (03/20/2015) [-]
I laughed so hard when she was arrested.
#80868 to #80864 - anon (03/19/2015) [-]
Seen it. Bretty good. Based spooks
#80863 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
This is pretty true. I think I'm starting to leave my "free market" phase.
User avatar #80881 to #80863 - cabbagemayhem (03/20/2015) [-]
That's a huge step back. I thought your political view was based on knowledge, not the seasons. How is it so hard to resist the urge to give someone else control over your life and tell others how to live theirs?
#80871 to #80863 - pebar ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
I've been resisting authoritarian temptations   
I've been resisting authoritarian temptations

User avatar #80872 to #80871 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
It's so hard not too. Fuck.
#80876 to #80872 - pebar ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
It would take a hell of a lot more to get me to change.
User avatar #80883 to #80869 - feelythefeel (03/20/2015) [-]
Wikipedia is a regurgitation of commonly accepted fact. Nothing commonly accepted about WW2 is right.
#80908 to #80883 - anon (03/20/2015) [-]
it doesn't say what you like huh?
User avatar #80865 to #80863 - redandgreen (03/19/2015) [-]
Lots of people on here seem very right wing and authoritarian though.
User avatar #80870 to #80865 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
because they've been on /pol/ a lot
#80856 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
So how many would you be interested in doing a senate RP?   
I think lulz mentioned that the board did this before. Basically have a mock senate where you can make your own political party that people can vote for. I'd be willing to set it up if there's enough demand for it.
So how many would you be interested in doing a senate RP?

I think lulz mentioned that the board did this before. Basically have a mock senate where you can make your own political party that people can vote for. I'd be willing to set it up if there's enough demand for it.
User avatar #80887 to #80856 - feelythefeel (03/20/2015) [-]
Change that to National Socialist Workers Union.
User avatar #80884 to #80856 - feelythefeel (03/20/2015) [-]
Will I have to be there as it's happening? Or can I be a few hours late? If so, I'm all for it. I call dibs on the National Socialist Worker's Party of (Insert what senate is for here).
#80866 to #80856 - theluppijackal (03/19/2015) [-]
I would be the Christian Communist Party for funsies.
User avatar #80905 to #80866 - cabbagemayhem (03/20/2015) [-]
Either a distinction needs to start being made between anarchists and American libertarians, or you have been deprived of education about libertarianism.
User avatar #80859 to #80856 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
Yeah for sure. Only where do we get the political parties from and are we actually going to use the senate to vote on issues?
User avatar #80860 to #80859 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
Anyone can essentially make a political party or be independent if he/she so desires, but only the ones that make it over the vote threshold will be in the senate. All they would have to do it state the name of the party, the ideology and a list of viewpoints they hold. If a party is essentially completely similar to another party (Both paleoconservative for example) They are asked to merge.

Voting would be done in the method of seat counting. If a party votes yay and has 15 seats they will give 15 votes.
User avatar #80894 to #80860 - lulzforcrimea (03/20/2015) [-]
Maybe you should make up some parties and we can discuss there viewpoints and then figure out who belongs where.
User avatar #80862 to #80860 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
Nice, I'm liking this. We should create some parties with their viewpoints on different topics and then see which users align with which.
#80855 to #80854 - anon (03/19/2015) [-]
User avatar #80847 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
So we had provincial elections in The Netherlands and the results are in.

Labour party lost BIG. Like major big, they lost about 6 seats and 40% of their votes compared to 2011. They even lost the majority in my province and my province has always been extremely big labour voters.
User avatar #80885 to #80847 - feelythefeel (03/20/2015) [-]
What about that election over the water?
User avatar #80912 to #80885 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/20/2015) [-]
Apparently 50 PLUS for some reason which makes no sense because it's a party focusing on senior rights.
User avatar #80852 to #80847 - lulzformalaysiaair (03/19/2015) [-]
So which party won the most? Also you got any kind of pic of a map or something?
#80853 to #80852 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
I live in the province below the commies.
User avatar #80848 to #80847 - compared (03/19/2015) [-]
Thanks for using a comparison, hope you have an excellent day!
User avatar #80849 to #80848 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (03/19/2015) [-]
I hate you.
User avatar #80850 to #80849 - compared (03/19/2015) [-]
That was rude.
User avatar #80867 to #80850 - redandgreen (03/19/2015) [-]
Compared to what?
User avatar #80875 to #80867 - compared (03/19/2015) [-]
Compared to other comments which aren't rude..?
User avatar #80834 - feelythefeel (03/19/2015) [-]

I started a Vic2 thread, in case anyone here is interested in Paradox games. That counts as politics, right?
User avatar #80816 - sinconn (03/19/2015) [-]
He better fucking delete his account.
#80819 to #80816 - anon (03/19/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#80818 to #80816 - lulzformalaysiaair has deleted their comment [-]
#80815 - davidavidson has deleted their comment [-]
#80820 to #80815 - anon (03/19/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
 Friends (0)