x
Click to expand
Latest users (1): youregaylol, anonymous(23).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#90226 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/07/german-tv-air-muslim-prayers-historic-broadcast-150716150029860.html

That's it, I'm done man.

God just bring in the nazis please, I don't even care if they start genociding Jews or any other group. Nazis are the only way to fix this, please.
User avatar #90281 to #90226 - byposted (07/17/2015) [-]
A televised prayer does not trigger me to declare a, personally, pronounced proposition. Indeed, pathetically, I confine my support to psuedonationalist ("nationalist," at all, if only because members might profess it) strains such as PEGIDA, which do not mind racial pedigree, but antiquated questions of religious fervor, and more "modern" concerns about how womyn, pigmented fair, or bearing body hair, should fare, under the, supposedly imminent, and divinely eminent, Shari'a.
User avatar #90227 to #90226 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
I 100% endorse Nazism now. 100%
User avatar #90252 to #90227 - levvy (07/17/2015) [-]
even the nationalists here would never support national socialism. they destroyed more slavic culture and over 6 centuries of orthodox jewish culture for a political faith that failed in the end. you as a slav and a jew should know this. stay just a pro-cappie nationalist over a national socialist, they only cause death
User avatar #90286 to #90252 - byposted (07/17/2015) [-]
Russia was rushed by an emotional current, or waves of ideals? Nay, those German soldiers whose lives lie short of the Urals were not seeking to, oxymoronically, impose nationalism, or even to strengthen their own, but, conventionally, claim hegemony, over an adversary (allegedly to secure this nationalism against the internationalist front which it supposedly represented, but one which, certainly, was not ideal to maintain shared border with...no less the perilous Polish).

Your conception of warring ideologies is contradictory, certainly to a convicted nationalist, who would not be dissuaded from domestically applying a form of National Socialism, derived from the German model, simply given bad blood between his nation and the Teutonic!

Any aversion to call oneself what one is is, simply, sentimentalist semantics. Of course, there are varying "nationalists," including lulz, who clings to capitalism, who are, or may be, terminologically confused. Why someone like you would prefer a "national conservative" over the economically enlightened socialist is either due to a greater, geopolitical confusion, or accelerationist dependency. Ideology does not kill, as with Leninism.
0
#90285 to #90252 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90263 to #90252 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
I do much rather prefer capitalist nationalism (National Conservatism). However I would much rather have Nat Soc then what Europe has now.
#90223 - anon (07/17/2015) [-]
#90222 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
Guilty of not giving a fuck.
User avatar #90228 to #90222 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
Who is that?
User avatar #90232 to #90228 - pebar (07/17/2015) [-]
the guy who just shot 4 marines
turns out he's ISIS sympathizer
User avatar #90233 to #90232 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
ISIS is not a threat though...
User avatar #90237 to #90233 - pebar (07/17/2015) [-]
Ok, he still killed people because praise allah
User avatar #90238 to #90237 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
I was being sarcastic.
#90224 to #90222 - anon (07/17/2015) [-]
Conservative media will be all over this.
#90218 - anon (07/16/2015) [-]
User avatar #90210 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
starshiptroopers.wikia.com/wiki/United_Citizen_Federation

My love of starship troopers and it's form of government is a little unhealthy.
#90212 to #90210 - anon (07/16/2015) [-]
"The Terran Federation has a multicultural society that votes for a global leader, similar to a representative democracy."
User avatar #90213 to #90212 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
" The Federation is a veteran-led, republic-style parliamentary system of government"

This is what I mean mostly.
User avatar #90205 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
Wait wait wait, Bernie Sanders is actually a popular individual in the running for US president?

Many of my friends are rooting for the guy, and so aren't many people I know. Apparently people WANT a larger government and more debt.

Fuck, I'm about to join a nationalist movement if it means getting people who think that way of doing things will solve our problems instead of exacerbate them. "Let's fix our problems with spending and welfare by spending more and handing out even MORE money!".

People make no Damn sense.
User avatar #90219 to #90205 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
He's rising in polls, but still far behind Hillary and chances of beating her despite grassroots hoping is small.
User avatar #90207 to #90205 - akkere (07/16/2015) [-]
I doubt Sanders will overcome Hillary in terms of acquiring the Democratic nomination or achieving the presidency. In fact I think it's more likely he'll end up running as an independent and drawing votes from Hillary in the long run.
User avatar #90208 to #90207 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
I don't think he would become the democratic nominee either. Although I didn't think he'd even be talked about, but he is.

It just seems to me that a growing number of people are becoming more and more big government.

User avatar #90209 to #90208 - akkere (07/16/2015) [-]
I'm not surprised he's talked about; he plays the appearances pretty well. The same people that became die-hard fans of Ron Paul for little reason than appearances seem to have transitioned to being die-hard fans of Bernie Sanders, which is ironic considering how completely different their policies are.
But like the fanbase of Ron Paul, it amounted to very little more than nothing. The polls seem to consistently show that yes, Sanders is rising, but the margin between him and Hillary is still overtly massive.
There will probably be a large hype train come the election time, some of it finding its way here (boy will that be a storm o' shite), but it won't amount to much of anything except hopes for the next election.
User avatar #90206 to #90205 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
Bernie " literally an inch from communism" Sanders

Bernie " Jesus was a socialist" Sanders
User avatar #90211 to #90206 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
god is a commie, though
User avatar #90203 to #90201 - youregaylol (07/16/2015) [-]
I doubt it but its still hilarious
#90195 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
>tfw you will never die in battle
#90214 to #90195 - anon (07/16/2015) [-]
>tfw you aren't even fit for battle.
#90215 to #90214 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
>tfw you are a jew
#90216 to #90215 - anon (07/16/2015) [-]
And lovin' it.
User avatar #90225 to #90216 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
Thank you anon.
User avatar #90199 to #90195 - youregaylol (07/16/2015) [-]
You can always make your own battle
User avatar #90221 to #90199 - syrianassassinsoul (07/16/2015) [-]
really? let us see, dis gonna b gud

ay schnizel u dumbass little dirty kebab bosnia lost the war!
User avatar #90283 to #90221 - schnizel ONLINE (07/17/2015) [-]
Actually by some logic we won, Serbia failed to conquer us.
User avatar #90196 to #90195 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
fug
download it and it work i think
User avatar #90184 - noxiouspumpkin (07/16/2015) [-]
So it seems that most of the frontpage is full of people kssing Bernie Sander's ass. Thoughts?
User avatar #90192 to #90184 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
Mainly due to Joshlol reposting shit from imgur which is mainly used by Reddit and Reddit is filled with progressive/socialist cucks that love their circlejerk culture.
User avatar #90189 to #90184 - thekame ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
tbh he is probably better than most candidates. Certainly better than Hilary and Trump anyway.
#90197 to #90189 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
you missed someone
User avatar #90198 to #90197 - thekame ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
Rand isn't even half the man his father was. He's still one of the few better candidates than sanders.
User avatar #90202 to #90198 - economicfreedom (07/16/2015) [-]
It completely dumbfounds me how some people can be for Ron Paul and people like Bernie Sanders at the same time.

The are completely opposite.
User avatar #90217 to #90202 - thekame ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
The most important thing that unites them is foreign policy, it is also the only thing I actually care about as a none American.
User avatar #90183 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
Showed my dad a bunch of statistics that damn blacks, proving, amoung other things, their inferior intelligence and criminal tendencies. I largely expected him to start getting pissy.

His reaction can literally be summed up with "That's just how it is". Not sure if I'm happy with that.
User avatar #90186 to #90183 - youregaylol (07/16/2015) [-]
stop bugging your father kevin hes had a long day at work
User avatar #90245 to #90186 - feelythefeel (07/17/2015) [-]
Me too.
User avatar #90204 to #90171 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
SHUT IT DOWN
User avatar #90180 to #90171 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
"Israelis support Iran anti-nuke deal"

Well no shit.
User avatar #90181 to #90180 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
The top one.
User avatar #90182 to #90181 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
Oh. Lel
User avatar #90172 to #90171 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
akkere, marinepenguin, pebar, youregaylol
User avatar #90157 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
>when whites stay, it's gentrification
>when whites leave, it's white flight
What the fuck are we supposed to do?
User avatar #90194 to #90157 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
Be Aryan and not care what those who are inferior say.
User avatar #90193 to #90157 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
When we reject culture we're nationalists
When we accept it it's cultural appropriation

You can't win either way.
User avatar #90229 to #90193 - lulzreborntwice (07/17/2015) [-]
Actually you can, genocide them/kick them out.
User avatar #90144 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
Tsipras Law: The more you reject bail out deals from the EU the more likely they will come back with even more insane bail out deals and the more likely you'll be pussy whipped into accepting it.
User avatar #90148 to #90144 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
correction:
inelastic demand without any leverage is a bitch
0
#90147 to #90144 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
#90136 - akkere (07/16/2015) [-]
So, Tom Cruise wants to start a "Scientology CNN", or a studio that will put out bigger productions to promote the Church of Scientology, and possibly expand into television networks.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3156464/Inside-Tom-Cruise-s-Scientology-CNN-TV-news-network-set-launched-new-Hollywood-50-million-studio-bigger-Paramount.html
hollywoodlife.com/2015/07/13/tom-cruise-scientology-tv-network-not-quitting-religion-for-suri/

If this does turn out legit, will this have an actual impact on extending the influence of the organization? Or will it backfire by putting the group on a much larger spotlight with every big release and have them vulnerable to a larger spread of criticism?
User avatar #90169 to #90136 - youregaylol (07/16/2015) [-]
They invested so much money I'm sure they have a plan.

If you control the media you control everything, I can only see this turning out well for them.
User avatar #90142 to #90136 - kanadetenshi (07/16/2015) [-]
It's definitely going to backfire.
User avatar #90141 to #90136 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
Who cares really, its entertainment. People won't actually by into this shit.
User avatar #90145 to #90141 - akkere (07/16/2015) [-]
I'd hope so, but the church is surprisingly influential and powerful. It could be that this is Tom Cruise's way of having the church fall under some serious backfire with all the negative discussion this could catalyze (he was originally supposed to leave the church for his daughter but this story proves otherwise), but we'll just have to wait and see.
User avatar #90130 - lulzreborntwice (07/15/2015) [-]
You are marching on the battle field against the enemy, statistics says there is a 50% you will die and a 80% of some sort of injury.

What song will you play as you march at your enemy?
User avatar #90162 to #90130 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
Augen geradeaus If I'm going to march to my death, it'll be with the pride of struggle in my heart, the joy of sacrifice in my mind, and the rifle of a free nation in my hands.
0
#90161 to #90130 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90132 to #90131 - lulzreborntwice (07/15/2015) [-]
I never knew you were gay.
#90134 to #90132 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
is my taste in music that bad?
User avatar #90137 to #90134 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
You picked a really, really bad song to play when you are marching into war and may never live again... completely out of taste for the scenario
User avatar #90138 to #90137 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
Battle Cry of Freedom So it's marching TO war, and the battle hasn't started yet?


like this?
User avatar #90140 to #90138 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
Nazi German Hardcore Hell March

Jesus christ, kill yourself.
User avatar #90146 to #90140 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
that is more shit than anything I would have ever posted
User avatar #90150 to #90146 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
LOL you have fucking horrible taste you stupid fagget.
User avatar #90152 to #90150 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
at least I don't jerk off to everything remotely related to the nazis
#90154 to #90152 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
Actually I picked it because of the intense music. Nazis are better then what we have today IMHO.
#90155 to #90154 - pebar (07/16/2015) [-]
and how did you find the video
if you weren't searching for nazi-related thing simply because it has nazi in the title?
#90158 to #90155 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
>imblying I didn't know about that video/march to begin with

fuckin pleb
0
#90128 to #90124 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
0
#90129 to #90128 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90122 to #90117 - drastronomy (07/15/2015) [-]
why the fuck did she start beating her own car

autist spasm
#90113 - drastronomy (07/15/2015) [-]
Can someone explain to me why "Hate-speech" is illegal? How can countries that enforce punishment as a result of hurt feelings ever consider themselves a true democracy? How do they have the fucking gall to claim they have freedom of speech if you can get imprisoned for calling someone a word they don't like?

It does not combat racism, if it at all exists. It does suppress anyone with those opinions though.
It does not help the ethnic minorities
It is not easy to apply practically

A democracy that suppresses a group simply on the grounds of disagreement is no democracy at all. The majority should never be able to reduce the human rights of the minority.
#90116 to #90113 - schnizel ONLINE (07/15/2015) [-]
**schnizel used "*roll picture*"**
**schnizel rolled image** jews
#90190 to #90133 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
**schnizel used "*roll picture*"**
**schnizel rolled image** Plox be a jew
User avatar #90191 to #90190 - schnizel ONLINE (07/16/2015) [-]
well fuck me
User avatar #90107 - darealsnooki ONLINE (07/15/2015) [-]
"Why are blacks the only ones that are frequently suspected of crimes?", "Why are Asians so smart?"...

I'm tired right now, and might regret this later, but do we see a trend here?
User avatar #90127 to #90107 - feelythefeel (07/15/2015) [-]
>because niggers are committing those crimes
>because asians are secondary to whites but have resisted degeneracy
User avatar #90135 to #90127 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
How are Asians secondary to whites?
User avatar #90139 to #90135 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
I'm assuming this coversation is ignoring all asian countries besides China, Japan and South Korea, since the rest are pretty fucked.
>China
>economy is completely artificial, only held up by ridiculously lax business controls, market manipulation and straight up felony
>a farce that's exposed every time it regularly crashes
>even with that considered, it's a poor imitation of the west at best
>SK and Japan
>economies built entirely on funds that would have gone to defence if not for the USA
>without white intervention/influence, we wouldn't even be talking about these countries
User avatar #90143 to #90139 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
Modern economic prosperity has little to do with which race is better.

I'm talking more in terms of heritage, history, technological achievement and resources at hand. Asia, especially China, has just as impressive of a pre-colonial history as Europe does.
User avatar #90156 to #90143 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
There's really only been a short period in which China rivaled Europe in any of those fields. For most of it's history, and especially for any non-Chinese region, Asia's been at most a rival to the Muslim world.
User avatar #90159 to #90156 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
The Chinese empire under the Han Dynasty at one point was just as large and powerful as the Roman empire during the same time period around 100-200AD. Chinese vessels have been thought to have sailed as far as California over a hundred years before Columbus reached the Americas.

One of the greatest reasons Europe succeeded I'm conquering the world was it's use of gunpowder, which China was the first to use. The reason that the Chinese weren't able to use it as effectively, was because they didn't have access to salt peter to make guns more effective, which was largely supplied by animal feces. The Chinese and much of Asia didn't rely on animal husbandry nearly as much, and thus didn't have access to as explosive of gunpowder.

So something as simple as penning in more animals can be the difference between a technological edge in a war, or a destroyed civilization.

If Europe didn't have something as simple as animal shit, it very likely wouldn't have used gunpowder weaponry, which was a huge contribution to its success in a post-colonial world.
My whole point is, just because a specific culture won out and dominated, doesn't necessarily mean it's an inherently superior culture. It was just in a much better position for becoming dominant. And Europe is a Damn excellent place for a thriving civilization.
User avatar #90163 to #90159 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
So because Asians were too busy for most of their history balkanizing and fighting wars between petty warlord states to, amoung other things, invest as substantially in animal husbandry as Europeans, we can throw all of the evidence in favour of whites out the window?
User avatar #90164 to #90163 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
>implying that Europe wasn't constantly fighting between themselves in warlord-like states for thousands of years as well

No I'm not saying that. I'm just pointing out that something as minor as how much you use other animals can be a huge difference, you could find a hundred other little details that would put one group of people above another because it gave them the slightest edge in warfare or industry.
User avatar #90165 to #90164 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
The difference was that Europeans, being superior, evolved past that. Not completely, but just enough for it to serve as a competitive edge as opposed to a hindrance.
User avatar #90166 to #90165 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
They never evolved past that. Europe had very few years of peace under its belt until after WW2. And that's only been held together by MAD, and now an attempt at an economic union of European states, which has shown to have failed.

We are in the greatest era of peace in the history of mankind, and that was marked by the invention of the atomic bomb. The only reason we're not killing each other is because we're too good at it.
User avatar #90167 to #90166 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
It's like you ignored the second half of what I just said.
User avatar #90170 to #90167 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
I didn't ignore it. I just put forth a reason why it's a false.
User avatar #90173 to #90170 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
How? I said "Not completely", and you're acting as if I said "Completely".
User avatar #90174 to #90173 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
I know what you said. I just don't think we've learned at all. We've simply stopped out of self preservation.

Nottice there hasn't been a direct war between two large nuclear powers in 60 years.
User avatar #90175 to #90174 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
I'm talking before that. If I had to estimate when, I'd say it was after we started driving the Muslims out of Europe, but certainly before we started discovering and colonizing the world.
User avatar #90176 to #90175 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
So you're saying that during the renaissance we became less hostile to each other?
User avatar #90178 to #90176 - feelythefeel (07/16/2015) [-]
Not completely. Again, just enough for it to serve as a competitive edge as opposed to a hindrance.
User avatar #90179 to #90178 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
That's a topic worth debate I'd say. It would take some extra looking into.
User avatar #90177 to #90176 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
Whites I mean.
User avatar #90153 to #90143 - lulzreborntwice (07/16/2015) [-]
*Almost as impressive
User avatar #90160 to #90153 - marinepenguin (07/16/2015) [-]
I know what I said.
#90125 to #90107 - minibeep (07/15/2015) [-]
asians being smart is brobably a stereotype in america because americans are so stupid.
black people are violent and stupid and that lead them into doing crime most of the time
User avatar #90112 to #90107 - schnizel ONLINE (07/15/2015) [-]
evolution didn't stop at the neck
 Friends (0)