x
Click to expand
Latest users (1): radiserne, anonymous(16).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#82190 - anonymous (04/06/2015) [-]
Opss
User avatar #82174 - radiserne ONLINE (04/06/2015) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMJf-EoRc1g

Swedish interviewer getting BTFO by Margaret Tatcher. You can just tell how the truth is stinging the Swede.
User avatar #82191 to #82174 - drastronomy (04/06/2015) [-]
Rekt
But really she was just doing her job, she may not have been trying to represent her own ideas
#82173 - alimais (04/06/2015) [-]
How to give liberals a mental meltdown :
How to give liberals a mental meltdown :

HIDDEN CAM: #GayWeddingCakes at Muslim Bakeries?
#82197 to #82173 - cabbagemayhem (04/06/2015) [-]
Modern liberalism represents the ignorance of the populace. It cares about its own feelings, but can't see past that, and doesn't understand how its opinions, if applied, would actually destroy their civil rights along with everyone else's.
User avatar #82170 - cantfindausername ONLINE (04/06/2015) [-]
So what is your opinion on Edward Snowden? Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Government Surveillance (HBO)
User avatar #82172 to #82170 - radiserne ONLINE (04/06/2015) [-]
He's a cool dude. I don't like that he's staying in Russia though.
User avatar #82160 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
What are your guys opinions of the rise in nationalist parties across Europe?

With the rise of immigration, economic struggles, the worsening Euro, and inevitable dissolution of the EU, I think these far right parties are not only here to stay for a while, but may eventually gain full power. I've long thought that if things continued to go as they hsve
#82203 to #82160 - anonymous (04/06/2015) [-]
They're not the little Hitlers you think them to be.
User avatar #82217 to #82203 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
I'm not implying that.
#82221 to #82217 - anonymous (04/06/2015) [-]
Knock knock
User avatar #82222 to #82221 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
who's there
#82228 to #82222 - anonymous (04/06/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #82175 to #82160 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
As someone who lives in a European country with a right-wing nationalist party these guys are nothing more than populists trying to leech of the gullible that are not satisfied with the liberals or social democrats. They're con-artists at best, isolationists at worst.
User avatar #82180 to #82175 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
In other words you are telling us they are lying about everything they say?
User avatar #82182 to #82180 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
They're populists, they're profiting off the uneducated lower class problems. When they get in power if that's even possible for them they'll likely abandon most of their principles.
User avatar #82230 to #82182 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
I surely hope not. And I don't think they should pander to only the lower class, unless your saying that nationalism panders to the lower class.
User avatar #82232 to #82230 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
It generally does. Due to it's anti-elitism nature.
User avatar #82171 to #82160 - radiserne ONLINE (04/06/2015) [-]
I think it's nice to see that people actually do care about their history, heritage and culture. However, when parties like Front National receive funding from Russia, who time over time have shown they couldn't give two fucks about fundamental freedoms, rights, and the integrity of a neighboring country's borders, some of these nationalistic parties do concern me. Of course, The Danish People's Party is known to hate Putin with a gut, so here in Denmark I'm not as concerned.
User avatar #82165 to #82160 - pebar (04/06/2015) [-]
I can understand them opposing immigration of non-europeans due to cultural reasons but opposing immigration from fellow europeans will have a harmful effect on their economies. Markets work best when resources are allowed to move around; that's one of the reasons the EU exists in the first place. One of the reasons the EU isn't doing so well is because workers are refusing to move among other things .
User avatar #82166 to #82165 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
Exactly, I'm not anti-immigration by any means. People moving around are how our economies and cultures evolve and adapt. I'm not anti-muslim, but I fully support a group of people trying to keep their own homelands and culture from being overrun by another one that is largely incompatible with their own.

The EU and UN is a great step in the right direction, but I think we need to try and work towards a fully united Europe and even a fully united western world.
User avatar #82176 to #82166 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
Oh please god no. Just a free trade economic alliance is good, but the EU and UN are totalitarian monsters politically.
User avatar #82161 to #82160 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
Have recently, the population of Europe will try and fight against the threats against their cultures and ways of life. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a large scale war surrounding Europe in the next few decades.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/15/far-right-threat-europe-integration
User avatar #82163 to #82161 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
And though I don't believe myself racist, I do believe that Europeans have a right to defend themselves and their traditions, and while I am American, the vast majority of my heritage is German 50% and Italian 25% , and I can't help but feel like I'd align myself with many of these rising parties as well. I'm conflicted about another era of facism and nationalism in Europe, but I don't want to see it overrun and have its history destroyed by the tide of Islam that's threatening to wash over it.
User avatar #82162 to #82161 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
This is a great thing, nothing more to say. A people are threatened and so they stand up.If this happens, the history books will look upon it as a great part of history.
User avatar #82164 to #82162 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
I agree. I think Muslims have a right to immigrate to Europe and even maintain parts of their culture, but when they start trying to form whole nations into their ideal nations is when they cross the line, and all Europeans should, and are starting to, fight and heavily protest against these things. Immigrate where ever you want to live, but don't expect that place to lay down when you try to take control.
User avatar #82159 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
A person identifies as transsexual with male DNA

A person identifies as a wolf with human DNA

A person identifies as a Dragon God with human DNA

I see no difference. Gender is just an idea of "I identify as this _____", it's totally irrelevant. Who cares what you identify with.
User avatar #82177 to #82159 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
"Male DNA"

I don't think you know how biology works. Chromosomes are the differences in males and females, but the DNA base pairs contained in the chromosomes are identical.
User avatar #82179 to #82177 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
Thank you Professor, I know wtf XY XX are. But did you just really say the DNA in the X and Y chromosomes are the same because that's fucking retarded.
User avatar #82181 to #82179 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
The chromosomes have different combinations for certain genes (Y has the Gene SRY) but the base pairs are identical.
User avatar #82183 to #82181 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
Quit the word games, males and females are obviously distinctively different genetically.
User avatar #82184 to #82183 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
You claim they have different DNA's comparable to different species. This is false.
User avatar #82186 to #82185 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
This talks about different genetic formations, not DNA base pairs. A chromosome may have less base pairs but they don't have different base pairs.

I'm giving your biology essay an F.
User avatar #82187 to #82186 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
At what point did I say the base pairs where different? I said the DNA was different.
User avatar #82188 to #82187 - kanadetenshi (04/06/2015) [-]
DNA refers to base pairs. Not genetic combinations.

The biology of trans people has been well documented by people who understand biology far more than you ever could.
User avatar #82189 to #82188 - lulzforalpsplane (04/06/2015) [-]
Alright fine, you win about the base pairs part. That still really doesn't take away from my point. Gender is a stupid concept because it's just identifying yourself as whatever you feel like being. Sex on the other hand is physically, distinctively different (male, female).

Your claim of being a crossdresser holds as much weight as an otherkin wanting to be a wolf and a man thinking he is the 2nd Jesus...
User avatar #82167 to #82159 - pebar (04/06/2015) [-]
FARILY ODD PARENTS EPISODE #? gender usually is a reference to the significant behavioral differences, not DNA.
User avatar #82158 to #82157 - feelythefeel (04/06/2015) [-]
I wish this wasn't just the Onion.
User avatar #82155 - publicpubic (04/05/2015) [-]
Political systems: What do you think of the political system in Britain? Is the "first past the pole" system outdated? The system clearly favors the two largest parties in the country.
User avatar #82169 to #82156 - mixednuts (04/06/2015) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Alternative_Vote_referendum,_2011

It's a shame the UK rejected IRV. In the upcoming general election, they have five parties seriously contesting the election, as well as several regional parties. Whoever wins is probably going to come in with a small percentage of the popular vote, and they're going to have to make up an uneasy coalition.
User avatar #82178 to #82169 - voltkills (04/06/2015) [-]
there are better methods than FPTP but AV is not one of them.
#82146 - anonymous (04/05/2015) [-]
If it robs like a nigger, kills like a nigger, acts like a nigger, it's an Innocent black boy who hasn't done anything wrong and has a good future ahead of him but the racist society of today is keeping him down.
User avatar #82147 to #82146 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
forgot2login
#82145 - anonymous (04/05/2015) [-]
User avatar #82143 - topoftherock (04/05/2015) [-]
hey /politics/ i'm doing a speech on political correctness in the media and how it is ruing media coverage. what i'm gonna be doing is comparing examples of politically correct coverage compared to "normal" coverage of the same stories. any examples you can think of would be great help.
User avatar #82148 to #82143 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
Trayvon Martin case
Michael Brown shooting, 2 Great places to start.

Take a look at leftiwing media in the U.S and how they cover stories compared to other media sites. Just compare the "sensitive" stories.

The coverage of the Arkansas and Indiana Religious freedom law is also another example, they don't talk about how it's a right to deny service, they instead call it "right to discriminate" which is totally biased.
User avatar #82152 to #82148 - topoftherock (04/05/2015) [-]
thats a good place to start. thanks!
User avatar #82151 to #82148 - topoftherock (04/05/2015) [-]
im also going to be talking about how 24 hour news cycles have played a large part in the increase of biased coverage and i am looking for examples of good coverage before 24 hour news cycles were implemented.
User avatar #82144 to #82142 - radiserne ONLINE (04/05/2015) [-]
Lulz is going to have trouble keeping up.
User avatar #82150 to #82144 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
It's far too insignificant.
#82131 - byposted (04/05/2015) [-]
www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/man-dies-after-sex-with-scarecrow/story-fnixwvgh-1227291248835

How could a White man be driven, to death, by such sexual depravity?
User avatar #82141 to #82131 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
Please don't post anime.

Also degeneration of moral values and autism.
User avatar #82136 to #82131 - radiserne ONLINE (04/05/2015) [-]
>Argentina
Why am I not surprised.
#82133 to #82131 - antibodies (04/05/2015) [-]
>Argentinian man
>White

0
#82130 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#82119 - marinepenguin (04/05/2015) [-]
After seeing how this board is usually anti-black and anti-muslim and pro-white for many users, I'm curious to see what you think of this humanity fuck yeah post.
#82253 to #82119 - anonymous (04/06/2015) [-]
gg
User avatar #82256 to #82253 - marinepenguin (04/06/2015) [-]
Do you really want to genocide all non-whites?
User avatar #82117 - stevecartel (04/05/2015) [-]
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
User avatar #82120 to #82117 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
HAHA LOL MEMEMEMS GUYS D D D D XDd!1111111
User avatar #82123 to #82120 - stevecartel (04/05/2015) [-]
Nice meme kid
#82102 - anonymous (04/04/2015) [-]
User avatar #82114 to #82102 - akkere (04/05/2015) [-]
Strangely enough, Dave Wilson's opponent, Bruce Austin, was actually black himself and therefore also had the factor of those who voted based on race alone.
Only problem I'd really have with it is the old deceptive name dropping trick, in which part of his pamphlet involved the reference of being cousins with and endorsed by a Ron Wilson, which happens to be the name of a former legislator in that area, when in actuality it was a different Ron Wilson entirely.
Otherwise, it was a pretty funny trick, and an interesting statement in itself.
#82112 to #82102 - cabbagemayhem (04/04/2015) [-]
Yes, this is hilarious. They deserved it for voting for someone based on their skin color.
User avatar #82125 to #82112 - byposted (04/05/2015) [-]
The incumbent, as akkere related, was also Black. Dave Wilson's insincere relation to "Ron Wilson" seems to have been the deciding factor, in his victory.

Of course, the Ron Wilson, which the community knew, was, too, Black, and the implication is that it would not have voted, in such competitory numbers, for a White man - with financially conservative inclinations, no less.

But what is the fault in thinking that in order for a politician to represent you, they must be of your race?

Had Blacks not remained complacent, while the Jewish NAACP vetoed their voice, during the latter portion of the 20th century, and, rather, clung to the popular Nation of Islam, or any other adhesive, racial front, which actually boasted of a higher composition representing their race, where, today, would they be?

Had Blacks identified the correct issues, and pursued their ends, would they be uplifted, or downtrodden, relative to the shackled past? Today, as it stands, they have been abandoned* by their former Jewish, Egalitarian "champions," whose descendants have moved on to advocate for greener social justice issues, such as those pertaining to homosexual relations which, ironically, the bulk of Blacks stand opposed to.

*The term "abandoned" may incorrectly signify that these Jews promised Blacks fulfillment. They promised "equality," and left them as equal as my lanky, left arm, to my fapping right.
User avatar #82110 to #82102 - lulzforalpsplane (04/04/2015) [-]
So this genius basically implied that he was black (legally) and won the election because so many morons today vote for people just because they are Black. I see nothing wrong with this, scratch that. Who the fuck votes for someone because they are black? Execute scum like that.
User avatar #82122 to #82110 - byposted (04/05/2015) [-]
What is wrong with holding race as a prerequisite, for consideration, in voting?

Are you going to adopt leftist language, and, presently, allege that Blacks "discriminate," as electors?

That's near branding the Muslim world as "misogynist," or "sexist," to legitimize one's loathing of Orientals (whose tickets to Europe, remember, could have been voided by the offspring of native women, too "empowered" for our own benefit).

Appealing to Feminism and Egalitarianism is the new ingenious strategy of the Kosher Right! It arises, as I've been writing, from identifying the wrong adversaries: immigrants and Islam, over Egalitarians and Feminists.
User avatar #82127 to #82122 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
ehhh...nothing, I'm a hypocrite in that sense. You're right.
#82124 to #82122 - anonymous (04/05/2015) [-]
why is it everything you post reeks of shill
#82129 to #82124 - byposted (04/05/2015) [-]
Anonymous, you are a floating particle, dwelling in the sewers, underneath my house.

You are so accustomed to the putrid stench of manure, that when lead up the piping, which leads into my toilet bowl, the faint smell of cleanly living sends you rushing, back down.

This smells like the human excrete, in which you inhale: "NIGGERS ARE DUMB, FUQ MUDSLIMS - MUH BURGERS; HEIL RABBI JEWSUS! DEUS GEVALT, FOR QEMYNKIND!"

The embedded picture smells like my quarters: 12,500 niggers .
0
#82128 to #82124 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#82126 to #82124 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#82121 to #82110 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #82103 to #82102 - redandgreen (04/04/2015) [-]
I must admit, that's kind of funny.
#82092 - anonymous (04/03/2015) [-]
#82101 to #82092 - anonymous (04/04/2015) [-]
I think one would be deluded to compare people whose political views lean right who wanted to view the death pictures of a terrorist who targeted their country in the past for affirmation to radical extremists who would be fully willing to murder innocent people if said images were released.
#82096 to #82092 - cabbagemayhem (04/04/2015) [-]
What's the point of killing him if not to make an example of him? That's another stupid picture. The surest way to tell a conspiracy is that all of the evidence regarding an issue is held solely by an elite few. Pics and timestamp or it didn't happen. Don't be a noob.
User avatar #82095 to #82092 - lulzforalpsplane (04/04/2015) [-]
Yeah because properly burying a disgusting, terrorist and then not even showing death photos is the "proper" thing to do. Fucking ridiculous, America spat on the ones that died on 911 by doing that. It should have shown pictures, video and burned the bastard with bacon and anyone who got mad in America should have been labeled an extremist Islamist. I'm always anti-conspiracy theorist but how am I even supposed to believe the U.S government? I do it only out of trust, not evidence.
User avatar #82107 to #82095 - redandgreen (04/04/2015) [-]
The point was to remove terrorists from the world not make more of them. Degrading him in the way you suggest would just generate more hate and make the world think less of America.
I think they did the right thing in treating the body respectfully as pointlessly outraging moderate muslims would just mean more problems.
User avatar #82116 to #82107 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
TOP FUCKING KEK m8. You are no moderate muslim if you get outraged at the defecation of a disgusting terrorists corpse. Like I said, you deserve to be labelled an extremist. And as if I care if it creates more terrorists, terrorists will be created in mass numbers in the Middle East anyways because of Western presence and the radical extremist, authoritarian culture of Islam. If the defecation of a horrible man's corpse turns you into a terrorist, then you are bound to be one later on anyways, how is that so hard to fucking grasp?

And I'd like to add that the point wasn't just to remove terrorists, for most in America it was purely on revenge, and revenge was not given. No proof has been given which is outrageous and a the peaceful wittle burial is just a slap in the face. Like this fuck deserves a nice burial, the only possible argument towards this would be principle (if you do this to one guy, who else can you do this too, where is the line drawn?) .
User avatar #82135 to #82116 - redandgreen (04/05/2015) [-]
America isn't the enemy of Islam, do you understand that? It's a small section of crazy people who hate and attack the West and those people do not represent Islam.

What America shouldn't do is pour oil on the fire by appearing to be the enemy of Islam, which is exactly what you're suggesting.
User avatar #82139 to #82135 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
"America isn't the enemy of Islam, do you understand that?" That is very debatable but not even my point.

>What America shouldn't do is pour oil on the fire by appearing to be the enemy of Islam, which is exactly what you're suggesting.

No I'm not, your twisting my words. Read again what I said.
User avatar #82154 to #82139 - redandgreen (04/05/2015) [-]
I'm making reasonable assumptions as to the outcome of your suggestions by empathising with others. Try it.
#82091 - anonymous (04/03/2015) [-]
So, anyone following the UK general election?
User avatar #82087 - jewishcommunazi (04/03/2015) [-]
What do you think of Sarkeesian? I think she sounds reasonable if we ignore all the stupid shit she says when it comes to videogames.
User avatar #82168 to #82087 - mixednuts (04/06/2015) [-]
She is a clever businesswoman.
User avatar #82104 to #82087 - redandgreen (04/04/2015) [-]
I agree with some of the things she's said. She's in it purely for the money though and because of that some of the things she says are aimed at reinforcing the prejudices of people who are inclined to support her views.
She isn't producing what she was funded for, at least in my opinion, and hasn't actually fulfilled her Kickstarter.
User avatar #82108 to #82104 - lulzforalpsplane (04/04/2015) [-]
>I agree with some of the things she's said.
Like what exactly?
User avatar #82111 to #82108 - redandgreen (04/04/2015) [-]
A lot of lazy and unoriginal writing for entertainment uses women as a plot device to motivate a male protagonist.
User avatar #82115 to #82111 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
And... that's a bad thing?
User avatar #82140 to #82134 - lulzforalpsplane (04/05/2015) [-]
Ohh yeah huh? What's so bad about it? I can't wait to hear the Damsel in Distress argument, damn you are dense
User avatar #82153 to #82140 - redandgreen (04/05/2015) [-]
Because women have no agency in those stories. You're the dense one if you can't see that.
User avatar #82137 to #82134 - radiserne ONLINE (04/05/2015) [-]
Why?
User avatar #82097 to #82087 - lulzforalpsplane (04/04/2015) [-]
....what....what could possibly be reasonable about her? She's a fucking batshit crazy SJW feminist.
User avatar #82093 to #82087 - akkere (04/04/2015) [-]
Problem is, she's not working to spread any "common good" in feminism but merely to twist the issue (if there even was one to begin with) to achieve profits; this is pretty heavily evident between the kickstarter she made to "upgrade" her show, but merely continued doing the same exact thing and pocketed the extra money, and the patreon abuses she's made.
Most of the "reasonable" things she says is pure misconception like the ol' 77% female shtick, so even when she's trying to be rational she's wrong, and anyway her main thing is pushing the idiot banter on video games in the first place.
She's merely putting on a guise of being an activist to achieve self-profit; none of her proceeds goes to funding something like employing women in the work force of game design, and whenever a charity or organization does work to push for that independent of her, she throws a hissy fiss with her other SJW partners.
User avatar #82098 to #82093 - jewishcommunazi (04/04/2015) [-]
Damn, that's fucked up.
User avatar #82088 to #82087 - radiserne ONLINE (04/03/2015) [-]
Personally I despise people who make a living out of having opinions about stuff. I'm not talking about politicians here, because at least they manage sometimes to turn their words into action. Bloggers, like her, just speak about how they feel about stuff, which is something a 10-year old would be able to do. As long as she hasn't done anything noteworthy in her life aside from "commenting, debating, criticizing and speaking" on stuff, I won't waste my time listening to her either.
User avatar #82089 to #82088 - jewishcommunazi (04/03/2015) [-]
I don't despise those people because of that. Maybe a little with the exception of music judges a little in shows like The Idols, etc. A lot of people simply comment for a living. Sports, politics, etc. It's frequent to see people doing it, which is probably why I don't care all that much.
 Friends (0)