Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (2): lulzformalaysiaair, schnizel, anonymous(16).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#73669 - levvy (12/03/2014) [-]
:^)
:^)
User avatar #73688 to #73669 - alimais (12/03/2014) [-]
There goes the moral of the guys
User avatar #73690 to #73688 - levvy (12/03/2014) [-]
they will shoot some civilians in a near by village and feel fine again, put the blame on novorussia
#73675 to #73667 - cabbagemayhem (12/03/2014) [-]
>Wake up in Libertarian utopia
>Surf my fiber optic internet for a few minutes from my choice of ISPs
>Get in my hydrogen fuel car which I spent an extra hundred dollars on for a seat belt that I never wear because of superior airbags
>My account is automatically charged 0.25 to use the new solar freaking roadway
>Get out of work
>Car's not there
>Strange because crime's gone way down since the war on drugs ended
>Call my friends to see if they borrowed it...nope
>Just remembered we still have a government that provides a few basic services
>Call the police department
>Of course, they just take notes and say they'll check on it in 45 minutes
>Call a private law enforcement agency
>They jump on the call
>They find my car before it gets chopped up
>They charge me a reasonable $1000 which I don't have to pay right away
>The money comes directly from the thieves restitution
>Walk down the street one day
>Some ancient Liberal tries to stab me
>Shoot them with my free gun rights
>Private police officers rush over to help because that's what people do
>They save him before he bleeds to death
>He becomes a Libertarian and lives happily ever after
User avatar #73707 to #73675 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
Amazing
User avatar #73708 to #73692 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
>not believing in free market
Libewal cri more.
User avatar #73720 to #73708 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
f... fucking commies!
#73691 to #73675 - levvy (12/03/2014) [-]
>immigrate to Libertarian utopia
>have no money
>walk down the road looking for work
>private law enforcement agency stop me and tell me to pay for waking on road
>they arrest me
>die in prison

Such is life in Libertarian utopia
#73710 to #73691 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2014) [-]
There's no private police officers in Libertarian policy. If one existed, it would be in the form of bounty hunters, private investigators, or organizations that makes civilian arrests. Law enforcement is still a function of the government.
User avatar #73719 to #73710 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
what a barbaric backward system, getting a life prison for walking on the road. most of the 3rd world has more freedom then a libertarian utopia lol
#73731 to #73719 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2014) [-]
What are you talking about? You can walk on the streets. If you privatized roads, the worst that could happen would be a fine if you intentionally bypassed the toll. It's really not much different than today. What's barbaric is imprisoning people for petty crimes and policing for profit, which are two things that are already a reality with big government.
User avatar #73759 to #73731 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
policing for profit is capitalism
#73769 to #73759 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2014) [-]
No, no. Law enforcement isn't a function of business. It has nothing to do with Capitalism. Policing for profit (a.k.a. extorting money) is what government does, whether capitalist or communist. In a free society, though, we can see it and oppose it. On the other hand, communist countries extort money in even more creative ways, and the people think it's for their own good.
User avatar #73775 to #73769 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
>law enforcement isn't a function of business

muh private law enforcement though?
the government is evil XDD

you contradict yourself.
#73792 to #73775 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2014) [-]
No I didn't. Policing for profit is a term used to describe police policy that rewards officers based on the number of tickets and arrests made. That isn't a necessary part of a private or centralized police force. Anyway, like I said, the police department is a function of government. Private business only gets involved in investigative and bounty hunting roles.
User avatar #73793 to #73792 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
"Policing for profit is a term used to describe police policy that rewards officers based on the number of tickets and arrests made."

um.... how else would a private police force make a current flow of money?

in a small government the police force would be weak because lack of funding, a group of people could rob or kill someone before the police even arrived. and when they do arrive it would be too late (assuming you don't just kill the police when they arrive because you could have a bigger gun then them when they got to the crime). sounds very flawed.
#73803 to #73793 - cabbagemayhem (12/04/2014) [-]
A private police force would operate just like a centralized police force. It would be funded by a community on a recurring fee base. If they harassed civilians or failed to respond quickly, they could be replaced by a more competitive organization.

The police already arrive too late. They never stop crimes, they only clean up the mess. Shrinking government isn't about shrinking all departments equally. It's about getting rid of the wasteful unnecessary departments, and focusing on a few core functions. Police funding wouldn't go down, but it might go up, and there would be more political incentive to improve the police department.
User avatar #73835 to #73803 - levvy (12/05/2014) [-]
>funded by a community on a recurring fee base

so a tax, or do like to call it forced charity?

"It's about getting rid of the wasteful unnecessary departments, and focusing on a few core functions."

like what?

"Police funding wouldn't go down, but it might go up, and there would be more political incentive to improve the police department."

how would funding go up? libertarians call taxation theft.
yes there would be more political incentive to improve the police - because crime would rule the city it would be hell.
#73872 to #73835 - cabbagemayhem (12/05/2014) [-]
Yes, like a tax. Who do you think libertarians are: anarchists? Libertarians don't think taxation in and of itself is theft, just taxation for wasteful reasons, or taxation without proper representation. Libertarians agree with taxation, but support cutting counterproductive government agencies, and putting the money back in the people's pocket where it's more effective. Taxes are important, but they have a tendency to grow out of control. The taxes we pay today are historically high, and borderline socialist.
User avatar #73874 to #73872 - levvy (12/05/2014) [-]
you have autism
#73898 to #73874 - cabbagemayhem (12/06/2014) [-]
Seriously? You acted like a rational debater only to red thumb my comments and call me autistic in the end? I'd just red thumb you back, but it looks like everyone else already has. How disappointing.
#73671 to #73667 - levvy (12/03/2014) [-]
what a paradise!
#73672 to #73671 - jadewest (12/03/2014) [-]
the freedom is real
User avatar #73668 to #73667 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
Should've signed up for the Subway Eat Fresh® Club for special offers and being protected by the official Subway Police Department® Subway is not responsible for any injuries caused by police brutality, any complaints can be reported to our police costumer service or be found in our terms of agreement®
User avatar #73659 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
I'm so glad to know Darren Wilson was payed like $500,000 for his first interview (probably will be more) so he has lots of money to get back on his feet since he resigned.
User avatar #73666 to #73659 - akkere (12/03/2014) [-]
He'll probably take the route most ex-cops who ended up departing from their respective force but still wish to work in a similar field take and go for the private security sector. Good field for ex-police and ex-military alike that looks for those sorts of people for having not only the experience in combat training but also routine in handling a variety of situations.
#73674 to #73666 - youregaylol (12/03/2014) [-]
It will be hard for a regular LEO to get a job as a PMC without military experience, and even with that the dudes who make like 200 an hour have a special operations background.

Unless you're talking about like a mall cop or something in which case yeah he can definitely do that, I don't expect him to make more than 15 bucks an hour though.
User avatar #73714 to #73674 - akkere (12/04/2014) [-]
Oh no, nothing like full-on private military, especially not on training as minimal as law enforcement, more like working for a private security company like that deals with everything from... Mall cops... but also stuff like cash-management services (GARDA, etc.) or security detail in businesses that deal in higher priority goods or confidential information.
User avatar #73699 to #73674 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
I'd like to become a mercenary. That would be pretty dope. Maybe like a freight mercenary that kills Somalians.

:^ )
#73700 to #73699 - youregaylol (12/03/2014) [-]
Better go become a commando then.
#73657 - pebar (12/03/2014) [-]
Our Mayor just died
Our Mayor just died
User avatar #73661 to #73657 - feelythefeel (12/03/2014) [-]
Was he a good mayor?
User avatar #73662 to #73661 - pebar (12/03/2014) [-]
Yea, the river that runs through town had been flooding a lot in recent years. He had been really involved with that.
#73689 to #73662 - anonymous (12/03/2014) [-]
Maybe he was too involved with that and had to be ended ?
User avatar #73663 to #73662 - feelythefeel (12/03/2014) [-]
Sorry, man.
#73653 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
Why is there a shortage of doctors if biology is one of the most popular majors at practically every college?
User avatar #73665 to #73653 - akkere (12/03/2014) [-]
Biology =/= Full-on Med School, especially when a great deal of biology majors, namely those in the fields of Organic Chemistry, don't seek to become doctors, but rather researchers of one thing or another. Because of the high quantity of biology degrees the job market in that field is relatively shit, especially when very few have any sort of specialization in anything regarding the field.
User avatar #73656 to #73653 - byposted (12/03/2014) [-]
Biology degrees are worthless.
User avatar #73655 to #73653 - pebar (12/03/2014) [-]
Because biology isn't all you need to become a doctor.
Because healthcare is in very high demand.
Because the American Medical Association heavily restricts who can enter the field in order to keep supply down and prices up, just like a union.
User avatar #73654 to #73653 - undeadwill (12/03/2014) [-]
required. And less math.
#73676 to #73642 - youregaylol (12/03/2014) [-]
“We’re going to have a little bit of fun blocking our own traffic,” Adnan Esmerovic, 27, told the Washington Post. “In Ferguson, they want to make a protest about nothing and yet that attracted attention across the nation. We’re just trying to keep more police down here because of these little thugs.”

Balkans don't play around and they say it like it is.
Blacks should be wary about attacking them, these people know what real war is like. It's in their blood.
User avatar #73651 to #73642 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
Sick fucks. This is why I hate protesters. Because it inevitably causes riots and then niggery.
#73649 to #73642 - schnizel ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
The mighty Bosnian wizard shall cast a spell on those niggers.
User avatar #73643 to #73642 - marinepenguin ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
"Not racially motivated"

kek
User avatar #73636 - pebar (12/02/2014) [-]
Why do Europeans hate Google so much?
User avatar #73776 to #73636 - levvy (12/04/2014) [-]
easiest to get personal info from
User avatar #73664 to #73636 - akkere (12/03/2014) [-]
Some pretty strong criticisms of Google is their rather invasive tendencies towards consumer's private information for the sake of marketing it out to advertisers, especially when that information can be compromised and used by a lucky hacker for their own (happened with one of Google's very own engineers, I believe).

... but none of that seems to be really what the EU is tackling in the first place. They might just be looking to blast some big corporation for the hell of it.
User avatar #73650 to #73636 - undeadwill (12/02/2014) [-]
The tallest tree is the first to be struck.
User avatar #73639 to #73636 - schnizel ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
What?
User avatar #73640 to #73639 - pebar (12/02/2014) [-]
Europeans apparently hate Google with a fiery passion.
User avatar #73644 to #73640 - schnizel ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
Why?
User avatar #73645 to #73644 - pebar (12/02/2014) [-]
IDK, that's why I'm asking.
User avatar #73646 to #73645 - schnizel ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
Where did you get this from?
User avatar #73648 to #73647 - schnizel ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
Damn
#73652 to #73635 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
Canada is King. Stephen represent nigga.
#73637 to #73635 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
>The Blaze.

Just because you're a Libertarian doesn't mean you have to listen to Glenn Beck's shit. The guy's a loon and borderline fascist claiming to be a Libertarian.
#73641 to #73638 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
Nice assumption. I was just saying I'd prefer to see it from another source. I don't find The Blaze particularly reliable.
#73632 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
It says a lot about your country's media when the UK (The Guardian, The Telegram...) reports on your country better than any of your own top media does.

CNN- We're completely uninterested but we'll beat any horse till it's dead, man it's good to be rich and powerful

FOX- We're completely fair and unbia- OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST TYRANT TAKING OUR GUNS ARREST MICHAEL BROWN SOMEHOW

MSNBC- We're uhh....we're still relevant right? Uhhh... Yay Obama! For doing the thing! ...I think?
#73630 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
Афганские песни - Пришел приказ

User avatar #73634 to #73630 - levvy (12/02/2014) [-]
9th company was a great film
#73624 - unpopularopinions (12/02/2014) [-]
there is nothing wrong with being jewish
User avatar #73627 to #73624 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
I guess.
User avatar #73625 to #73624 - PopcornViking ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
#represent
#73613 - anonymous (12/01/2014) [-]
ITT: If you were voting for a political person to be president of the world, who would it be?   
can be from past or present.
ITT: If you were voting for a political person to be president of the world, who would it be?
can be from past or present.
User avatar #73670 to #73613 - jadewest (12/03/2014) [-]
schnizel because im not a jew
User avatar #73673 to #73670 - schnizel ONLINE (12/03/2014) [-]
<3
#73633 to #73613 - anonymous (12/02/2014) [-]
George Washington
User avatar #73621 to #73613 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
Fuck world government

but If I'm forced well then I guess me first, then Anders Breivik maybe, some member of a European Right wing party.

First goal would be to wipe out Islam from Europe.
User avatar #73617 to #73613 - feelythefeel (12/01/2014) [-]
Can it be from the future?
#73616 to #73613 - pebar (12/01/2014) [-]
no world government
no world government
User avatar #73615 to #73613 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
I reject a world government with one political leader but if i had to choose it would probably be Friedrich Hayek.
User avatar #73611 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
Listening to the voicemails left after doxxing, part 1 Girl got her phonenumber doxxed and is being harassed by ferguson supporters after she posted something that got people butthurt.
User avatar #73658 to #73611 - byposted (12/03/2014) [-]
pastebin.com/iMrDqP9H

Many of their numbers have been documented, in turn. I spent five dollars worth of skype credits on such calls as this one:

vocaroo.com/i/s1Ci8QYRCjFk
User avatar #73628 to #73611 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
I want to muh 6 million sperm on her face.
User avatar #73612 to #73611 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
Oh and unsurprisingly the people responsible for the doxxing and harassment are from tumblr.
#73607 - mixednuts (12/01/2014) [-]
How come you haven't you joined the Libertarian National Socialist Green Party yet?
User avatar #73622 to #73607 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
I saw this thread on /pol/

stop copy/pasta fagget
User avatar #73618 to #73607 - feelythefeel (12/01/2014) [-]
Why haven't you?
User avatar #73610 to #73607 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
It bothers me more that the swastika isn't in the middle of the flag.
#73598 - jewishcommunazi (11/30/2014) [-]
Anyone interested in doing this?
Link for newbies: politicaltest.net/
#73623 to #73598 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/01/2014) [-]
WTF is this shit? I'm no fucking commie

Also
>only 16% capitalist
>only 49% nationalist
User avatar #73561 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
>BBC has a debate about rape culture
>Feminists constantly bitch about how they're not doing anything
>One guy points to the rape that the majority of rape is caused by muslims rape gangs
>Gets booed by multicultural feminists

If you want to fucking address rape culture at least be honest with yourself. You can't claim to be against rape and then thoroughly deny the fact that the rape culture is rooted in multicultural failures.
#73608 to #73561 - anonymous (12/01/2014) [-]
*Muslamic Ray Guns
User avatar #73606 to #73561 - feelythefeel (12/01/2014) [-]
Feminists are retarded by default, BBC's retarded for acknowledging this crap. Next.
User avatar #73569 to #73561 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Blaming multiculturalism for rape is no different from blaming weapons for murder. There is no cultural basis to sexual violence, they're self-entitled from living in Middle Eastern nations where women are worth less than the dirt they can't walk on without an escort.

Police are just lazy fucks and cry "I dun wanna be called wacis" when people tell them to do their jobs.

It's also sickening to see how moral despots have basically turned feminism into the exact opposite of what it meant a decade ago. Women who want all women to wear burkas are no different from the men who want the same, it's all about having a sense of control over others.
#73575 to #73569 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
&quot;There is no cultural basis to sexual violence, they're self-entitled from living in Middle Eastern nations&quot;
"There is no cultural basis to sexual violence, they're self-entitled from living in Middle Eastern nations"
User avatar #73571 to #73569 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
"they're self-entitled from living in Middle Eastern nations where women are worth less than the dirt they can't walk on without an escort"

And who allowed to let these people walk free in our country? Multiculturalists. They believe these kind of people can actually live together peacefully.
User avatar #73573 to #73571 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
It's not "our" country, it's a country. It's owned by everyone who is certified as a citizen. Sexual assault is not culture, nations like Saudi Arabia are little more than chauvinist circlejerks enabled by an absolute monarch that we put no political pressure on because he has oil. You think these same rich Islamics don't get hammered and scarf down bacon when nobody looks?
User avatar #73574 to #73573 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
Sexual assault is definitely part of certain cultures, denying that is just lunacy. The fact is that cultures and countries are directly connected. A shitty culture will lead to a shitty country, that's how it is. Pretending that everyone is part of it is absolutely delusional.

Nations like Saudi Arabia are a perfect example why multiculturalism is a failure, because barbarians from that country come to ours (and yes it is OUR country because our country is defined by the culture we live in) and fuck up our place.

It's not a coincidence that there are only muslim rape gangs and no christian or humanist rape gangs. Their barbaric totalitarian culture that feels entitled to the bodies of women is not compatible to a free culture like ours. If you deny this then you're part of the problem.
User avatar #73578 to #73574 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
"You're delusional" isn't a very convincing rebuttal. Culture and opportunism are not the same thing. America has a strong fascination with guns, for example, which is cultural, but it's not part of our culture to have bullied teenagers shoot up schools. It's the sociological equivalent of character traits and character flaws.

If anything, this seems more like a convenient excuse to shit on multiculturalism, even though it's worked just fine for North America in general; the melting pot paradigm is one of the US's shining traits and a reason living here can be fun. If anything, "multiculturalism" sounds like a dog whistle for "different people not skewered on bayonets".
User avatar #73629 to #73578 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (12/02/2014) [-]
If anything, the U.S was seen as much better before when it didn't have multiculturalism and leftist immigration policies. And well now it's kinda gone down in class.
User avatar #73580 to #73578 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
Seems like you are incapable of differentiating "delusional" as a rebutall and "delusional" as an explanation after my rebuttal.

Culture and opportunism are directly related, when your culture allows you to see a woman as merely a fuckable object you can take advantage of that. It's definitely part of America's culture to have bullied teenagers shoot up schools, in fact it's a very clear cultural historical part of america. It's a cultural phenomena enforced by sensationalist media hype.

That's akin to saying being opposed to genocide is a convenient excuse to shit on nazism. Ofcourse it is when the result of said ideology equals pain and suffering.

Yeah multiculturalism worked SO WELL for the USA. Just ask the native americans.
User avatar #73586 to #73580 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
The Native Americans were assimilated in places where they incited violence against colonists. The Natives and colonists were actually on peaceful terms for the most part because it mutually benefited them to borrow ideas and behaviors from one another. The former, for example, loved modern advances like firearms and traded for them frequently, while the latter learned a lot about living efficiently and reliably on New World soil from the natives. They integrated culturally because it was the logical and sensible thing to do. On the flip side, in areas where colonists and tribesmen consciously refused to associate with one another, tensions often boiled over and resulted in violence.

It's also as if people only stick to a certain way of thinking and acting when forced to!

Crime is not a cultural aspect because culture requires people to work with another in a similar fashion, not against each other.
User avatar #73590 to #73586 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
So now you're resorting to historical revisionism and twisting the definition of culture to defend rape....

The colonists purely where on good terms with Natives for their own greedy benefit to later destroy their culture. And natives weren't prepared to that due to their naive multicultural values. Sounds familiar? the Indians granted the English permission to live on pieces of land within their territories. The English saw this as a right to own and permanently occupy the land. For their part, Native people believed that the newcomers had no right to permanently possess Native lands. In addition, Native people sometimes left their villages to hunt, fish, or gather resources. Frequently, they returned to their villages only to find the land occupied by colonists. The Powhatans grew increasingly angry as the colonists took over more of their lands. When the English began raiding Powhatan villages for food, sometimes killing women and children in the process, Native leaders retaliated. A series of wars started in the Chesapeake Bay region that continued through the seventeenth century.

So no it definitely was not caused by conflicts or refusing to help eachother, the Natives where reaching out to the colonists and gave them permission to live with them.

Obviously, that's why raping infidels is not a crime in most Islamic countries under Sharia. And that's precisely the reason why multiculturalism fails. Because they don't see what we deem as crimes as crimes.
User avatar #73592 to #73590 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
It's not historical revisionism, it's a documented fact. Why are you, someone with an avatar with "CAPITALISM!" written in bold lettering, contending that people acting in self interest are automatically evil? When you compare recorded violent incidents to the total populations of colonial America and see how many times colonists and tribes collided, you'll find that peace was the norm, not the exception. History teachers are, as always, overly obsessed with violence and tend to gloss over the "boring" parts of history where people weren't mudering each other.

My entire point is that attributing rape to culture gives rapists excuses. It shits all over everyone from an Arab nation that isn't a pervert and preserves the reputations of people who deserve to have their reputations destroyed by painting broad strokes over their rationales. The vast majority of people are not criminals. The moment you have punished a man for a transgression he was not even aware of, you have failed as a member of a sovereign state, and have failed as a human being. "Multiculturalism doesn't work!" is a briefly tempting way of saying "See? People who are different from us WANT TO KILL US ALL!!"

The case is as simple as perverts who lack a sense of empathy. That's it. Living in a certain culture does not mean you condone the every action of every individual. Women in SA and Iran don't like being raped (most of them, anyway), but in these nations, rape practically doesn't exist as a concept. Plenty of people find their sex laws appalling, but put up with them because the despot's words are law. At the same time, these people all tend to agree on everyday mannerisms and traditions that are considered normal to them.
#73576 to #73574 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
don't argue with him, you can't debate with progressives
User avatar #73579 to #73576 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Thank you for telling me what I believe for me, I was so confounded by that delimma.
#73581 to #73579 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
I imagine you're confounded by a lot of things. You probably question yourself all the time.

For instance, "why do I get a hard on from lizards fucking each other?"
#73597 to #73581 - anonymous (11/30/2014) [-]
You could just provide a counter argument instead of insulting someone for what they jack off to (especially if it has nothing to do with their argument) but power to you for insulting people you disagree with.
#73599 to #73597 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
It's impossible to argue with morons, they'll just drag you down to their level.
#73601 to #73599 - anonymous (11/30/2014) [-]
Just because people don't agree with you doesn't make them morons.

I highly doubt you can't debate with progressives just like I highly doubt you can't debate with regressives. That would be like saying I couldn't debate with theists, athiests, liberals, conservatives, and so on because they might disagree with me.
#73604 to #73601 - youregaylol (12/01/2014) [-]
Ya, it's just you proxyfagging.
User avatar #73582 to #73581 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Because people who aren't easily disgusted by unusual things tend to be more tolerant. A psychological aspect of social authoritarianism is oversensitivity and cowardice.

www.psychologytoday.com/blog/caveman-politics/201203/are-you-easily-disgusted-you-may-be-conservative
#73585 to #73582 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
&quot;If you want to be as tolerant as me jack off to scat porn&quot;   
&quot;kiddie porn has really opened my eyes to social justice and the plight of the negro&quot;   
&quot;watching this giant lizard get fucked in the ass by the cyborg fox kin has broadened my horizons about the civil rights movement&quot;   
   
Every time I think you've said the stupidest thing you could possibly say you surprise me by saying something dumber.
"If you want to be as tolerant as me jack off to scat porn"
"kiddie porn has really opened my eyes to social justice and the plight of the negro"
"watching this giant lizard get fucked in the ass by the cyborg fox kin has broadened my horizons about the civil rights movement"

Every time I think you've said the stupidest thing you could possibly say you surprise me by saying something dumber.
User avatar #73587 to #73585 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
I wonder what it's like to be so conceited and self-assured that one can spout logical fallacies like an angry preteen on a Counter-Strike server and convince themselves that they're arguing like masters of rhetoric.

I expect a "lel tahts wut ut liek".
#73600 to #73587 - youregaylol (11/30/2014) [-]
Haven't we talked about your habit of screaming "FALLACIES" without pointing out said fallacies?

Let me guess, did I use "lel stawmaninn" again?

Your picture should be used in the dictionary under faux intellectual, you can use the biggest words out of context and still think you're making sense.
#73602 to #73600 - anonymous (11/30/2014) [-]
You did attack an argument he didn't make though, which by definition would be strawmanning.
#73603 to #73602 - youregaylol (12/01/2014) [-]
Actually i didn't, he made the claim that not getting disgusted by unusual things makes you more tolerant, scat, kiddie porn, and furry porn are all unusual things.

I'm getting the feeling you're just being a proxyfag.
User avatar #73584 to #73582 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
Ugh i just hate people who are disgusted by rape gangs.
User avatar #73588 to #73584 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Rape gangs are bad for logical reasons, not because our dumbass feely fee-fees say so. Feelings are part of the human experience, but are inherently irrational: you can not make a logical decision based off of them, even if your conclusions could also be reached logically.

If you base a political decision on "this is offensive", you should not be allowed to vote.
User avatar #73591 to #73588 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
You're literally describing yourself and the progressive movement. Progressives and multiculturalists rely solely on "this is offensive to me"

Criticize Islam? Offensive.
Support Nazism? Offensive, ban freedom of speech.
Draw a cartoon? Offensive, he deserved to be murdered.

And right now you're blatantly trying to defend Islamic rape culture based on your feelings because opposing islam is not deemed politically correct to you.
User avatar #73593 to #73591 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
No, you need me to be defending what you perceive as Islamic culture, because it's easier to just shove me in a box with "fucktards" written on it than to think of me as an individual capable of thinking for themselves. I'm an ardent nonreligious atheist, I hate Islam just as much as I hate any other religion that condones violence, but I will gladly defend their right to practice it in their own homes, just like I'll defend a fascist's right to express their political leanings freely, no matter how repugnant I find said leanings.

Political correctness isn't an ideological thing, it's an idiot thing. The idea that conservatives and traditionalists are politically incorrect by nature is such a ludicrous, willfully ignorant thought that entire careers in the entertainment industry have been made on mocking the idea that left-wing = feelings and right-wing = facts.
User avatar #73563 to #73561 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (11/30/2014) [-]
I should really, really stop going here and /pol/ because I'm becoming a very racist and hateful person.
User avatar #73589 to #73563 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Don't be afraid to browse controversial media if you have the sense not to get sucked into an echo chamber. Good on you, man.
User avatar #73605 to #73558 - feelythefeel (12/01/2014) [-]
Slightly proud for my country. Slightly.
User avatar #73570 to #73558 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
Freedom to carry around firearms but not to express different opinions? Russia really is a conservative paradise!
#73562 to #73558 - cabbagemayhem (11/30/2014) [-]
I don't know what you're trying to say, but we support freedom of speech around here, even if we don't agree with what they're saying.
#73559 to #73558 - anonymous (11/30/2014) [-]
User avatar #73553 - mixednuts (11/30/2014) [-]
In short, what powers and responsibilities do you believe that the government should have?
User avatar #73572 to #73555 - Shiny (11/30/2014) [-]
If you need someone to explain for you, others will assume you cannot adequately defend your own beliefs yourself. Anything sounds nice coming from the mouth of a skilled orator.
#73539 - alimais (11/29/2014) [-]
Imagine falling asleep on a bus and waking up on the other side of the frontline

You need to login to view this link
 Friends (0)