Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (3): adoptedchicken, alimais, jewishcommunazi, anonymous(18).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#67674 to #67635 - anonymous (08/13/2014) [-]
>Falling for this again
User avatar #67675 to #67674 - huntergriff ONLINE (08/13/2014) [-]
it...wouldn't surprise me if this were true, honestly.
#67676 to #67675 - anonymous (08/13/2014) [-]
They searched the middle east up and down in and out, twice and found nothing both times, even if they did find anything it's either to minuscule to be effective or they don't have the know how on how to use it.

you really thing russia america china and the rest of the world would sit back and just hold meetings if this were true? Every bomb ever would be thrown at isis continuously for months on end.
User avatar #67652 to #67635 - schnizel ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
#67624 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]

Taking bets, how many rage comments do you think I can get from marxist fedora warriors before this post gets buried. I've already got 2 and this has only been out for a few minutes.

Bonus if you can guess how many rage comments will be anon.
#67640 to #67624 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
nice meme
User avatar #67634 to #67624 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
I think #21 is pretty much spot on.
#67644 to #67634 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
>nobody cares
>people raging

pick one
User avatar #67645 to #67644 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
I guess, but only about one or two guys.
#67647 to #67645 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
rule of thumb, caring enough to comment means you care
User avatar #67627 to #67624 - pebar (08/12/2014) [-]
Not many since you will be thumbed down too much and your post won't even be seen by most people.
#67628 to #67627 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
User avatar #67630 to #67615 - schnizel ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
Holy shit.
User avatar #67629 to #67615 - Shiny ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
How else will people protect their superior White Genes™?
#67632 to #67629 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
By breeding with other white people?

I realize this was your attempt at a joke but it doesn't make any sense.
User avatar #67616 to #67615 - pebar (08/12/2014) [-]
It seems OP doesn't know the difference between support and tolerate.
User avatar #67631 to #67616 - schnizel ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
Same shit, you let them do it.
#67618 to #67616 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
At some point there's going to have to be a point where the tolerance train derails and people wake up.

That point used to be interracial breeding, but we tolerated that. Then the point was homosexual marriage and adoption, but we're tolerating that. Now we see the next step in the evolution, we will soon have to tolerate incest and inbred monster babies. After that who knows, I can't decided if the jews will push for dog fucker pride or kiddie fucker pride, I guess we'll find out.
User avatar #67619 to #67618 - pebar (08/12/2014) [-]
I'd tolerate incest for the same reason I tolerate homosexuality. What people do with their own time is their own business as long as they don't affect anyone else.
I don't think you have to worry about it becoming common practice though. Incest is taboo in every single culture in the world so there appears to be a genetic predisposition against it.
#67620 to #67619 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
Well it's not taboo in every culture of the world, maybe every western country, at least it was. To me it's silly to say that the degeneracy ends here, that the homosexual agenda will be the end. After all we've seen what happens when nothing is sacred in society before, there was a time not to long ago when homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. The truth is it's inevitable that we'll move on to something else once the gay thing is solidified, and incest seems like the most obvious choice considering the whole basis for the pro gay crowd has been "muh 2 consenting adults".

The only consolation prize that I can see is watching the pro gay teens of today be the "bigots" of tomorrow when their grand kids want to start fucking each other.
#67622 to #67621 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
Things change.
User avatar #67613 - feelythefeel (08/12/2014) [-]
Any Fins mind explaining what the fuck's wrong with your language?
#67662 to #67613 - byposted (08/12/2014) [-]
Finns, being descendants of the Asiatic barbarians who once ravaged Europe, are few amongst the peoples of the continent to not speak an Indo-European language.
#67661 to #67613 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#67660 to #67613 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#67633 to #67613 - alimais ONLINE (08/12/2014) [-]
I like my grandmothers language

#67611 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
Do you personally recognize Taiwan?
User avatar #67617 to #67611 - pebar (08/12/2014) [-]
How Many Countries Are There? Yes; for all practical purposes, it's not part of China.
Also this video may be entertaining.
User avatar #67614 to #67611 - feelythefeel (08/12/2014) [-]
Yes, but not as China (In case they were still claiming to be "True Korea China").
#67608 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
Oh Canada, I didn't know how close you were to becoming Sweden 2.0: Electric Bugaloo
User avatar #67598 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
I am seeing a trend here.
Anytime black people chimp out,
The nationalist socialists chimp out.
#67612 to #67598 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
because criticizing the savage destruction caused by these race riots is the equivalent of causing said destruction.
User avatar #67625 to #67612 - undeadwill (08/12/2014) [-]
No you guys will chimp out if the black people just get upset even without the damnage being done.
#67599 to #67598 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
And anytime the NS chimp out, the libertarians chimp out about it.
User avatar #67600 to #67599 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
Not really.
User avatar #67602 to #67601 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
So libertarians chimped out at nat soc for how they reacted to trayvon martin?

So no we don't chimp out when you do, we only "chimp out" when you turn the political board into a circle jerk of "muh race is best" or "Hitler did nothing wrong"
User avatar #67610 to #67602 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/12/2014) [-]
Man this board is something...
#67609 to #67602 - youregaylol (08/12/2014) [-]
i wouldn't call what you do chimping out, it's more like whining.
#67603 to #67602 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
"Muh race is best"

When did someone say that ?
#67605 to #67603 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
ur race is best
#67587 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #67626 to #67587 - feelythefeel (08/12/2014) [-]
This is so Jewish I half expected to hear an "Oy vey" somewhere.
#67575 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
the holocaust never happened.
#67585 to #67575 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
This always confuses me.

People will deny that the Jews were exterminated, but won't deny the existence of the camps. What reason would the be rounded up for?
User avatar #67586 to #67585 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
For the same reason Japs were rounded up in the US during wartime
User avatar #67591 to #67586 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
Imagine if we lost the war for a moment. All of those Japanese would have joined the other side. That's plenty of new troops that would be released, so why let them live? After all it was war time. But the Germans hatred for the jews predates the war so they wouldn't have a moral concern for killing them like the Americans did with the Japanese.

Upon losing the war Hitler figured that at least they would hail him as they man who killed the jews.
#67623 to #67591 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
With jews...you lose!
#67606 to #67591 - anonymous (08/12/2014) [-]
citation needed
#67588 to #67586 - ablueguy (08/11/2014) [-]
Or the Ukrainians in Canada in 1914-1920, under the "War Measures Act"
Or the Ukrainians in Canada in 1914-1920, under the "War Measures Act"
#67589 to #67588 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
here you go, bud
User avatar #67590 to #67589 - ablueguy (08/11/2014) [-]
Thanks... dunno why mine was a gif, though I saved it as a jpg

We also had some Jews in concentration camps in the early 40's, though its kind of covered up.
#67583 to #67575 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
It never ceases to amuse me how many butthurt edits of this there are.
#67574 to #67571 - syrianassassin ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
now they will go to the media and cry about the holocaust and how the spa is anti Semitic
#67570 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
Anyone know if this is true? Seems strange since Ukraine rejected another "humanitarian convoy" from russia only days ago, and NATO predicted just hours ago that Russia is likely to invade Ukraine, under the cover of being an humanitarian operation.
User avatar #67580 to #67570 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Because Russia invades in companionship with the Red Cross
#67582 to #67580 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Oh now I get it,

Red Cross isn't a humanitarian organisation they are Russian assassins
User avatar #67592 to #67582 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
They don't like it coming from Russia.
User avatar #67596 to #67592 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Well but Russia is the country filled with refugees from Ukraine

User avatar #67597 to #67596 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
#67567 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
How do you feel about Monarchs?
User avatar #67604 to #67567 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Constitutional monarchies are probably only useful compared to parliamentary democracies when people are stupidly dogmatic to the point of treating political parties as if they were football teams. The other kinds of monarchies are pretty much dictatorships with a stupid way to select the next despot.
User avatar #67593 to #67567 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
A system of inbreds and weak men.
#67577 to #67567 - oxan (08/11/2014) [-]
I'm a member of the Australian Monarchist League and my portrait of the Queen arrived today.
User avatar #67569 to #67567 - schnizel ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
5/5 bretty good
#67542 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Events after NigNog got shot in the street, Free Market will fix this

Lootings, Thefts, Arson:
✓ Niggers escalate from a peaceful protest to a violent riot in minutes
✓ Niggers loot a liquor store
✓ Niggers loot the Foot Locker
✓ Niggers loot the Church's Chicken
✓ Niggers loot and set the QuikTrip on fire
✓ Niggers loot Rimzzz, a tire and rim shop
✓ Niggers loot the local Wal-Mart
✓ Niggers loot the Family Dollar
✓ Niggers loot the P&C Bank
✓ Niggers loot the Walgreen's
✓ Niggers loot the K-Mart
✓ Niggers loot the Criket Wireless store
✓ Niggers loot the RAC and Pawn-shops
✓ Niggers set fire to automobiles
#67568 to #67542 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
I wouldn't be surprised if the shooting was unjustified.

This is not the appropriate reaction though.
It just justifies further police overreach.
User avatar #67550 to #67542 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Should we just rename /politics/ to black people discussion?
#67554 to #67550 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
> current events mostly involve black people cause NigNog got shot
>some threads pop-up to current event because Lootings, Thefts, Arson, Shootings, Random Violence & Riot
>" just rename /politics/ to black people discussion"

Why don't you just kill yourself ?
User avatar #67555 to #67554 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
It was a joke. Go have Asperger's somewhere else.
#67556 to #67555 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I can't tell if you are serious or not because of the stuff you wrote in seriousness.
User avatar #67557 to #67556 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I don't take Internet forums seriously, honest opinions or not.
#67543 to #67542 - alimais ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
✓ Niggers shooting in the streets
✓ Niggers shooting at helicopters
✓ 4 shots at Walmart
✓ 3 shots at Scotsdale
✓ Niggers shoot police officer by Mickey D's
Random acts of violence:
✓ Niggers severely beat a guy at a Taco Bell
✓ ATM is kill
✓ Mayor ain't skeered of hackers on steroids
✓ Riot & K-9 units deployed
✓ Foop Daddy starts a new business enterprise
User avatar #67607 to #67543 - foop (08/12/2014) [-]
who's this foop daddy character
#67527 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
This board in a nutshell.
User avatar #67594 to #67527 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
I log off for one day and they fuck it up
#67519 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
Black Thug Gets A Beat Down By White Boy Professor Silverstein: "It is a known fact that the negroid male is superior to the white male physically."
Proud White Student Hero: "But Professor there is little to no scientific evidence that negroids have a distinct physical advantage over white males."
Professor Silverstein: "You think that because of the racism inherent in our culture, white supremacy clouds your worldview."
Proud White Student Hero: "I'm not so sure Professor, all of your studies are based on anecdotal evidence. It also has some troubling conclusions about the supposed benefits of race mixing when the opposite has been shown."
Professor Silverstein: "Your privilege is making you ignorant goy."
Proud White Student Hero: "Well ok. Do you think the white race is more intelligent than the negroid peoples? There have been several different comprehensive studies based on both statistics and biological observation, I could show-"
Professor Silverstein: "Absolutely not it's all environment."
Proud White Student Hero: "But I thought you said-"
Professor Silverstein: "Expelled for racism."

btw I know the white guy is a degenerate but I still like seeing the thug get trashed.
User avatar #67578 to #67519 - oxan (08/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #67521 to #67519 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
The modern figures of scientific racialism like J. P. Rushton are also some of the biggest advocates of the idea of blacks being physically superior.
#67522 to #67521 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
And he's wrong.
User avatar #67523 to #67522 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
No shit.
#67525 to #67523 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
I couldn't tell if you agreed with him or not, you have a habit of supporting jewish marxism.
User avatar #67526 to #67525 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I'll assume "marxist" here means "not fascist".
#67528 to #67526 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
No, it means marxist. Although I guess jewish marxism is more in line with cultural marxism if we're being specific.
User avatar #67529 to #67528 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I have literally never identified with Marxism in my life.
#67530 to #67529 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
I doubt there is one follower of cultural marxism that wears the colors of a cultural marxist knowingly, besides the chosen people.
User avatar #67531 to #67530 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Yeah, I've never been fond of assblasted reactionary buzzwords. :^)
#67532 to #67531 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
>complains about buzzwords
>uses "reactionary"

Calling a spade a spade prevents confusion.
User avatar #67533 to #67532 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
How is reactionary a buzzword? Plenty of people identify by it, and few are as emotionally crippled and easily manipulated as neo-Nazis.
#67534 to #67533 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
"and few are as emotionally crippled and easily manipulated as neo-Nazis."


I dispute the claim that many people identify as reactionary, and it is indeed a buzzword, especially the way you just used it.
User avatar #67535 to #67534 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]

It just means the opposite of radical, that's it. Meanwhile...


A phrase people whip out when they see something they don't like.
#67536 to #67535 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
Do you think many people identify as "radical"? I mean that's used all the time in the political world as an insult. "That radical Tea Party" or "Obama's radical agenda".

If anything you just proved my point, it's a derogatory term, which is why you used it.

And you used it as a buzzword. I don't need to find a wikipedia article to know that.
User avatar #67537 to #67536 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Sure, plenty of people consider themselves radicals. Meaningful words can be used as buzzwords as well as neutral language, but meaningless words are only useful as the former; I obviously meant that post as derogatory, but that was on me, not the language.

The main difference here is that "reactionary" doesn't sound like a paranoid conspiracy to revert society.
#67538 to #67537 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
What this boils down to is ideological ignorance. You, as a leftist and (in my opinion) an adherent of cultural marxism try to discredit it as nothing but a buzzword because it discredits you and your ideology. At the same time you see "reactionary" as a legitimate term, despite it's constant use by socialists to discredit those who oppose them, fascist or no.

Nobody seriously identifies themselves as a radical, and nobody seriously identifies themselves as a reactionary, it's a dumb assertion. They can both be used as buzzwords, and they can both be used for legitimate criticism, but don't insult your own intelligence by insisting that your evil is better than my evil, it just makes you look simple.
User avatar #67539 to #67538 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
My beliefs aren't up for you to decide. Notice how I haven't actually accused you of believing anything in particular.
All you're doing is painting anyone who thinks differently from you as a useful idiot caricature that only exists in your head while I've bent over backwards to defend the ideologies of people with beliefs drastically different from my own. You aren't the first person to accuse me of being a Marxist on a whim.

All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. Just because words with neutral meaning can be used as snarl words, doesn't mean words without neutral meaning can be used legitimately, because their definitions have already been established.
#67540 to #67539 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
Again with the "cultural marxism is meaningless" stuff. Here, since you love wikipedia so much. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism. Sure, some might use it in the wrong context, that doesn't mean that I do. I've seen you here many times, this is my honest opinion, you are a cultural marxist whether you know it or not. If you don't agree thats too bad, but i still didn't use it as a buzzword and you did use reactionary as a buzzword. I didn't accuse you on a whim, I don't throw around that term lightly because to me it's one of the worst things you can call a person, but there you go.

And actually you did imply that I was a fascist. I do hold several fascist beliefs, but you also hold several marxist beliefs.

Anyway, I think anyone with access to google can see that cultural marxism does have a meaning, the fact that you insist that it doesn't only discounts you honestly.
User avatar #67548 to #67540 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Well, that reply was disappointing. I'm going to bed, was fun while it lasted though.
#67549 to #67548 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
I work with what I'm given, shooting fish in a barrel is rarely entertaining.
User avatar #67546 to #67540 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I never said being biased was unusual or even bad, it's just funny when people talk down to me over my opinions as if they're enlightening me with their red pill of objective reality.
"You're showing your own ignorance of cultural marxism by associating it with the standard "vanilla" marxism. Cultural marxism deals with breaking down traditional societal barriers (as the cultural marxists will describe them) such as gender roles, sexuality, race, family, culture, and patriotism."
I think people can be as inbred, bigoted, elitist and jingoist as they want. That doesn't mean I won't think less of them for it, only that I don't want them making it my problem with imperialism and mob rule.
I'm sure some people would consider my more altruistic beliefs to be on the side of unfair force, but I can have rational debates with them. Not so much with people who have decided what I think before I direct my mouth to them.
"Cultural marxism is usually found among modern progressives, such as the gay pride movement, the feminist movement, various ethnic pride movements, globalists, and multicultural groups."
I'm against affirmative action, gender feminism and pride of...well, any sort.
"See, you continue to insist that it doesn't exist as an ideology when you don't even know what it is"
I know what it is, it's simply not relevant anymore. It's a convenient boogeyman in this day and age. The original Frankfurt theorists are dead in the ground. Even modern Marxist-Leninist organizations think it's horseshit!
#67547 to #67546 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
Of course you implied that it was bad, which is why you tried to be a smartass by pointing out that my opinion (like all opinions) was biased. Wtf are you talking about with this objective reality bs? I said in my honest opinion from the get go, I never claimed to be objective. You keep making shit up as you go along whenever I catch you, it's boring. Big words don't mean anything if you don't know what you're saying.

I have no idea what you're talking about in regards to mob rule and imperialism so I'll skip that. I never decided what you think, I looked at what you said and I decided that I believe you're a cultural marxist. If you don't agree with that, fine, but I'm not using it as a buzzword and even if I was it doesn't change the fact that you use buzzwords as well. You just want something to complain about.

And I severely doubt that you're not inclined with several of those movements if you're being honest, but thats besides the point.

You're wishy washy. First it was cultural marxism is meaningless, then it was it does have a meaning but nobody follows it, then it's it doesn't count because the original creators are dead. The original fascists are dead and gone as well, do you think fascists don't exist anymore? Of course not, you probably check under your bed for evil reactionary fascists. The original liberals are dead as well, is it impossible to be a liberal? Is it impossible to follow an ideology after their creators have died?

And most importantly, is it impossible for someone to follow an ideology without being aware of it? No.

Your arguments lack substance, at this point you're just asking me to fill in the blanks. It's boring.
User avatar #67541 to #67540 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
"I've seen you here many times, this is my honest opinion, you are a cultural marxist whether you know it or not."
Thank you for your clearly unbiased opinion.
"And actually you did imply that I was a fascist. I do hold several fascist beliefs, but you also hold several marxist beliefs."
I was speaking generally, actually.
Everyone holds some beliefs from every ideology, that means nothing unless you subscribe to the belief system wholemeal. I can assure you that I do not subscribe to Marxism in any fashion. It's naive and based on the idea that the different classes are not made, but born as is, as if being poor is wisdom and being rich is demonic, hewn into your genes for life.
This might shock you, but I don't believe all rich people are evil and all poor people are victims.

I also never said Cultural Marxism never had meaning, that meaning has simply been lost as it no longer holds relevancy as an ideology.
#67544 to #67541 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
Did you really just imply that it's irregular for personal opinions to be biased? I mean, that kinda comes with the territory doesn't it? Or are your personal opinions unbiased? Heck, from what I've seen you've probably deluded yourself into believing your own opinions are unbiased.

I doubt that you were speaking generally because if you did the context wouldn't make sense, but forget about that. You're showing your own ignorance of cultural marxism by associating it with the standard "vanilla" marxism. Cultural marxism deals with breaking down traditional societal barriers (as the cultural marxists will describe them) such as gender roles, sexuality, race, family, culture, and patriotism.

Cultural marxism is usually found among modern progressives, such as the gay pride movement, the feminist movement, various ethnic pride movements, globalists, and multicultural groups. They believe that these things, basically everything created by civilization, must be removed before the revolution can begin, whatever that is.

See, you continue to insist that it doesn't exist as an ideology when you don't even know what it is, that is a textbook example of willful ignorance. And you most certainly did say that it didn't have meaning, what do you think meaningless means?

Honestly this is starting to feel like a teacher-student conversation as opposed to an argument, and I never aspired to be a teacher, I don't have the patience for it.
#67513 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
What if we took like 90% of the federal money we give to people who can't find jobs
And gave it to local governments to create jobs with?
User avatar #67595 to #67513 - undeadwill (08/11/2014) [-]
Wouldn't work. They spend it one one time projects as always and still create nothing.
#67507 - oxan (08/11/2014) [-]

Riots because of that 'unarmed' Black kid police shot (pebar made a post). Of course particular demographics start looting.
User avatar #67517 to #67507 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Trying to figure out if this is joking.
User avatar #67576 to #67517 - oxan (08/11/2014) [-]
What is, friend?
User avatar #67584 to #67576 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
I dunno anymore.
#67508 to #67507 - pebar (08/11/2014) [-]
I wasn't racist before I started paying attention to current events.....
User avatar #67509 to #67508 - oxan (08/11/2014) [-]
We're all born racist, pebar. Just now we have experience to justify our nature.
#67505 - economicfreedom (08/11/2014) [-]
Hate crime is thought crime.

Should motivation itself be a crime?
#67510 to #67505 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
#67565 to #67510 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
So brave
#67502 - pebar (08/11/2014) [-]
Rand Paul wants to end all foreign aid, including aid to Israel.   
Rand Paul wants to end all foreign aid, including aid to Israel.
#67566 to #67502 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
On the fence.

I'd like to see us giving aid to developing countries a bit more in line with our ideals. Also, keep tabs on more corrupt governments, and cease if they misappropriate the funds.

For example, give Zimbabwe some money if Robert Mugabe loosens restrictions on the opposition and maybe frees up the markets a bit. Also make sure, the money goes towards infrastructure projects or something.

Just a hypothetical, could be any country. We won't be seeing any western influence in Zimbabwe as long as Mugabe's heart is beating.
#67520 to #67502 - youregaylol (08/11/2014) [-]
We should aid those in line with our ideals, which is a bit hard considering most of my countrymen don't know what our ideals are.
User avatar #67518 to #67502 - Shiny ONLINE (08/11/2014) [-]
Unwarranted foreign aid, sure, but providing crisis relief overseas is worth international brownie points we can't afford to lose.
#67511 to #67502 - anonymous (08/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #67504 to #67502 - lulzfornigeriagirl (08/11/2014) [-]
I get shithole countries but israel maiin
User avatar #67503 to #67502 - ablueguy (08/11/2014) [-]
Might be a good idea.
 Friends (0)