Upload
Login or register
Newest
Realtime Comments: On
Online User List [+] Online: (3): aceofshadows, canyou, pebar, anonymous(1).
asd
User avatar #136449 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I think America should be run like a business.
Trump is a CEO. Chief Executive Officer. President = Commander in Chief of the Executive branch. CEO OF AMERICA.
User avatar #136463 to #136449 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
No. The President has constitutional limits and authority. The Presidents job is to stop us from getting invaded and for the most part get out of the way. The President is not a CEO in charge of everyone's lives. He's not a leader of the entire country. People are in charge of their own lives.

Also business success has little to do with being a competent president. Ask Hoover
User avatar #136455 to #136449 - groundzero
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Didn't he had bankruptcy 4 times?
User avatar #136470 to #136455 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Chapter 11 not chapter 9
User avatar #136466 to #136455 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Can't win them all.
User avatar #136462 to #136455 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
half of all businesses have bankruptcy

there's a difference between business bankruptcy and personal bankruptcy

though none of that has anything to do with policy
User avatar #136456 to #136455 - asotil
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Yeah and he only had a few thousands successful other businesses. What a fucking loser amirite
User avatar #136457 to #136456 - groundzero
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Never said he was a loser.
#136445 - shekelnator
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
#136444 - shekelnator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
#136432 - Elk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
ITT who is the dumbest liberal on this board? I say that it's platinumaltaria
User avatar #136458 to #136432 - asotil
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Plat isn't a child molester I don't think But it is a self admitted cousin fucker who likes to call others idiot red neck cousin fuckers. Its arguments involve little else besides autistic screaming and "NO BUT THATS NOT RIGHT IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT IT SAYS AND WHAT ACTIONS THERE WERE ITS WRONG"

Also the meme game is fucking garbage so by default it's the worst board member
User avatar #136460 to #136458 - cognosceteipsum
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
funny thing about him is that everybody dislikes him. nice atheists, asshole atheists, nice theists, asshole theists... they all dislke him. it also seems like liberals and conservatives alike dislike him.
User avatar #136446 to #136432 - cognosceteipsum
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Plat. Other people express dumbness in other ways but he is most unrelenting.
User avatar #136438 to #136432 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Not theism. He's a liberal, but he's not as dumb as most liberals.
User avatar #136465 to #136438 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Half the time I'm not sure if theism is actually liberal or just really likes to troll alt-righters. Maybe both
User avatar #136435 to #136432 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
there are like only 2 liberals on this board. I'd agree, plus whenever platinumaltaria comes around here everyone calls him/her a child molester or something
User avatar #136451 to #136435 - platinumaltaria
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
They're just upset because I'm not muh stereotypical liberal. Read: I win arguments.
User avatar #136437 to #136435 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Plat is definitely a pedophile. Maybe a child molester.
User avatar #136464 to #136437 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Is there some funny backstory here?
User avatar #136450 to #136437 - platinumaltaria
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Erm no. But it's nice to see that, having no real arguments to use, you have resorted to baseless libel. You are ironically the muh libruls to my Trump ;)
User avatar #136461 to #136450 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Its not libel if you admit it.
User avatar #136469 to #136461 - platinumaltaria
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I can't admit what isn't true.
#136405 - pebar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Zootopia is on netflix and since I've heard such great things about it, I thought I'd watch it.
I'm only a few minutes in but I've decided I don't like political propaganda mixed with my entertainment.
User avatar #136436 to #136405 - Zaxplab
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Never seen that movie. Any examples of it?
User avatar #136453 to #136436 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
It was a good movie but it was blatantly a racism is bad theme.
The central plot revolved around certain animals being violation because they're predators
Or that nobody ever trusts foxes
User avatar #136459 to #136453 - asotil
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
To be fair we pretty much all distrust blacks and Muslims here because of repeated history. It makes sense herbivores wouldn't immediately trust carnivores because that's how the animal kingdom works

What Feely said though, the "Everyone needs to love each other or else" meme needs to die
User avatar #136454 to #136453 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Violent
User avatar #136439 to #136436 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Standard Steven Universe "Everyone should love everyone, wasists are ebil" meme.
User avatar #136433 to #136405 - undeadwill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I liked it alright
User avatar #136427 to #136405 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
And this wasn't immediately apparent before now because..?
User avatar #136428 to #136427 - pebar
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
it wasn't so blatant before
User avatar #136429 to #136428 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Were you not paying attention? This movie has been out for months. It was specifically designed to attract both furries and fandom fags at the same time.
User avatar #136416 to #136405 - canyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
My sister invited me to go watch Zootopia with her and my niece in theaters, but they overslept and I ended up going by myself as the only adult man in the back of the dark room filled with children and their cautious mothers.

Good movie though.
User avatar #136417 to #136416 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Why did you still go?
User avatar #136430 to #136417 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
She told me to meet her at the theater, so I went ahead and bought a ticket.
User avatar #136440 to #136430 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
As opposed to seeing something else?
User avatar #136452 to #136440 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I thought she would show up
User avatar #136448 to #136382 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I like how she donate to charities that are anti gay. No more forced policy of letting boys poop in the girls room.
User avatar #136424 to #136382 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I've heard some mixed reactions to this. Conservative Review claims she's a shill for Common Core and is going to increase federal power over education, and many libertarian sources lauding her as being really pro school choice
User avatar #136447 to #136424 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
She posted a statement that common core is retarded
User avatar #136383 to #136382 - marinepenguin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
This new anon thumbing everything down is annoying
User avatar #136385 to #136383 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
hes probably not new

maybe our new board mod could take care of it, with so many new rules mass down thumbs may be banned
#136373 - shekelnator
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
#136374 to #136373 - shekelnator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
better version
User avatar #136441 to #136374 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
"Would you like to fuck my wife?"
-Justin Trudeau.
User avatar #136362 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Our strength Life Versus the Void I really don't understand the sentiment of "I don't like the pilot, so let's crash the plane". You know what Republicans were thinking this time eight years ago? "I'm really disappointed, but I hope he proves me wrong". He didn't, but that's besides the point. Why can't Democrats be that mature? Are they really so self-absorbed that being right is more important to them than the success of their own country? If so, why should we listen to what they have to say if we already know that it comes so purely from ego and self-interest?

Is this really how Democrats are going to react every time they lose an election from now on?
User avatar #136371 to #136362 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Because no Republicans screamed bloody murder 8 years ago. Because no democrats act the way you said today.
User avatar #136375 to #136371 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
There are always outliers, but you have to admit that the Republicans took it a lot better than the Dems are now.
User avatar #136377 to #136375 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
No I don't think you have to admit that.
User avatar #136378 to #136377 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Did the Republicans riot in the streets, causing multiple deaths and injuries?
User avatar #136386 to #136379 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
1. First article only sources the splc ( www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2009/racist-backlash-greets-president-barack-obama ) and lists the most pathetic outliers possible. On the list they include a fucking 9 year old boy who told a girl on a schoolbus obama was going to get assassinated. None of this is near the equivalent of the rioting we see now
2. Has no sources and is from a vague website, even then only listing lone incidents where individuals who are anti obama did mentally disturbbed people did crazy things like kill their families, not rioting.
3. I can't factcheck random unsourced pictures, but I do know for a fact that the bottom right one of the burning obama effigy was actually by a pro obama group who did it for some reason. Not rioting.
4. That was from 2000, once again not rioting, people upset about counting processes, certainly not mass rioting that we're seeing now.
5. I should just not click it now simply because its huffington post, but fuck it. Even they had to put quotes in "riot" because it wasn't one.

So you see, you're full of shit and all of these are false equivalencies. Heres an idea, cameras weren't just invented this year, why don't you pull up mass republican rioting in 2008 and 2012, videos of them smashing volt boxes, smashing windows, dragging barriers, throwing rocks, setting trees on fire, shit like that? Because all of that is being recorded now and is on every mainstream media outlet.

Why not present those comparable recorded examples instead of vague reports from the left wing blogosphere, until then you have no evidence and are wrong.
User avatar #136401 to #136386 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Again though, its not fringe reports. These are documented occurences. Not to mention the hundreds of images a cursory search brings up. For the past eight years, you want to tell me nobody's protested Obama? You want to tell me all these incidents are lies? You want to tell me the images of burning effigees, burning campaign signs and racist or threatening signs are forgeries or dalse flags? Im not sure why little film exists. But i can tell you "its not on video" is a pretty shit argument.
User avatar #136402 to #136401 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
It is. There are reported occurrences, no actual evidence of rioting exists, only articles. The images that come up never show rioting, they show non violent protests. I never said that nobody protested obama, im simply saying that you cannot compare whats happening now to what happened then without comparable evidence. We know that people are rioting and burning things now because there is video of it and the msm is reporting it, you don't have that comparable evidence. The reason no film exists is because it didn't happen on the same level as this, period.

Until you can provide equivalent evidence this is a false equivalence.
User avatar #136403 to #136402 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
So the people who were assaulted made it up? Destroyed their own property? Sent themselves death threats?
User avatar #136404 to #136403 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Did the msm cover up the anti obama riots up? Did they create a blackout of cellphone cameras directly after both elections? Did youtube ban any mention of these anti obama rioting?

No equivalent evidence means its a false equivalency.
User avatar #136406 to #136404 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
If you want to claim it didn't happen the exact same way thats one thing. Student protests were well recorded so its possible socal media was less ubiquitous. Neither election was portrayed as contentious as this one gas been. But the important thing, in my opinion, is the result.

And you want to talk about false equivalences, did democrats do this over either Bush? Republicans over Bill Clinton? Who protested Carter or Reagan? The difference could very well be this election. We know Trump promised riots if the RNC was contested and made vague claims about what would happen if he lost the election. Its difficult to say what would happen if he lost.
User avatar #136407 to #136406 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
It may be that this was a more controversial election, but still the other side never did this and there is no equivalent evidence that they did, so we have to assume that it didnt happen.

How about we stop arguing and you just give my bbc head. That will solve everything.
User avatar #136408 to #136407 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
The majority of reporting is protests with instancs of violence though. So id still say your narrative is wrong.
User avatar #136409 to #136408 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Disagree. You should still consider sucking me off tho, I taste like chicken.
User avatar #136410 to #136409 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Das gay tho.
User avatar #136411 to #136410 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I am literally a homosex nigger.
User avatar #136412 to #136411 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Go be black somewhere else.
User avatar #136413 to #136412 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I'd rather be black in u
User avatar #136414 to #136413 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Is that sexual harassment?
User avatar #136415 to #136414 - threesixmafia
0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Thats a sexual promise.
User avatar #136387 to #136386 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
The first article has enough examples. Itstelling you dismiss the whole thing because of a few examples on the list but that doesn't undo the multiple instances of assault, vandalism and death threats recorded. Also its telling that you attack things as unsourced but provide no sources yourself. I see no reason to tale your claims seriously if you wont play by your own rules.
User avatar #136388 to #136387 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
so no video then?
do you need me to provide the video of people burning shit in the streets or destroying power boxes right now? because i can provide that
User avatar #136389 to #136388 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
What do you call the logical fallacy where you demand one specific form of proof, when theres no actual reason only that proof is acceptable and ignores all other proof?
User avatar #136390 to #136389 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
right, video evidence from multiple national news outlets is equivalent to vague reports, not even related to rioting, from unknown left wing sites.
User avatar #136391 to #136390 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
For one, there s a video of students throwing rocks and burning campaign signs, and the dysphemism is cute but its a bit more than vague reporting.
User avatar #136392 to #136391 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
awesome, lets see it and then ill provide 5 videos of people rioting right now, then you can provide another video, then ill provide 5 more, then finally you'll provide 5 videos of the comparable behavior, then we can safely call it an equivalency
User avatar #136393 to #136392 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I already linked it.
User avatar #136394 to #136393 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
i dont see it, provide the youtube link, im sure there are multiple copies online of violent rioting in the usa, there are for every other instance of rioting
User avatar #136395 to #136394 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
The university of Mississippi riot.
User avatar #136396 to #136395 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I youtubed it, I found a blurry video of some kids walking around at night with a police siren plus some chanting www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsAVIsGV6ek and then another video of david packman talking about the "riot" and but never showing footage.

i can see why you didn't want to link it yourself, that was pathetic, also why no msm news outlets have picked it up, nothing happened.

Okay my turn
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAym1xh94_E
www.youtube.com/watch?v=geXnR93Su2E
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jk1MQB9bDA
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfLl9LniZWo (this is a big one)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R3VDpFTD5o

now give me something at this level please. republicans totally did this before so you should have something like this.
User avatar #136397 to #136396 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Again, do you know what that fallacy is called? Because it seems common enough to deserve its own name.
User avatar #136398 to #136397 - threesixmafia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Could you shut the fuck up about imaginary fallacies and actually try to provide comparable evidence, or do you just want to keep avoiding the fact that you have none?
User avatar #136399 to #136398 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Can you listen to another person for once in your life? Do you deny that the events i described happened? That following obamas election and reelection conservatives destroyed property, assaulted bystanders and drmonstrated in the streets? Now following trumps election, liberals have destroyed property, attscked bystanders and demonstrated in the street. Or are you going to continue to demand your very specific form of proof?
User avatar #136400 to #136399 - threesixmafia
0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Yes. Yes. You have shown no hard evidence that this happend or that it happened on the same scale as the current riots, which is why I'm asking for actual comparable video evidence. Yes. I will continue to demand actual proof, not unconfirmed reports from fringe websites that aren't comparable to the video evidence we have now.

All this time you spend panicking you could spend trying to find documented evidence of this comparable rioting. Or do you believe that the cameras didn't exist 4 to 8 years ago, and that no msm covered it for some reason?
#136361 - feelythefeel
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #136354 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Retaliatory tariffs don't makes sense to me.
Even if another country has their own tariffs, there's still no reason to put up your own.
It'd just make the problem worse
User avatar #136418 to #136354 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
It's better than direct intervention.
User avatar #136420 to #136418 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
it's worse than doing nothing
User avatar #136421 to #136420 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Economic pressure is ideal, it's like bloodless warfare.
User avatar #136425 to #136421 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
by causing rampant unemployment, misery, and business hardship
User avatar #136426 to #136425 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
If the tariffs are levied for a good cause, it's one of the most humane forms of meaningful economic retaliation. Some things are worth fighting for.
User avatar #136357 to #136354 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
why retaliate in a way that harms you? It would be like if an enemy crosses a blockade or something, you blow up their ship and then one of your own.
User avatar #136356 to #136354 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
"Just stop shooting each other guys, thats not cool"

- Man who single-handedly brought an end to the concept of armed conflict
User avatar #136358 to #136356 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Except if you're being shot at, you have an incentive to shoot back
There is no such incentive with tariffs, so your an ology breaks down
User avatar #136359 to #136358 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Why would you not have an incentive? It would harm their economy
User avatar #136360 to #136359 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Yes, but it also hurts us
User avatar #136365 to #136360 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
how
I have a test in macroeconomics soon so i should know this, but i want an educated economist to tell me
User avatar #136367 to #136365 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
increase cost of production for domestic producers
increase price of both domestic and foreign goods for consumers
less USD flow abroad so foreigners have less money to buy our exports
less specialization
User avatar #136368 to #136367 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
What if the country in question imports only small quantities of goods from the country imposing the tariff? Then most of these effects would be negligible.
#136369 to #136368 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
but they would still be bad, an no tariffs would be better

and you'll have a hard time finding a real world example of a country that's so isolated
User avatar #136350 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I've seen a few reports that a group of computer scientists are pushing Clinton to call for a recount in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin after sine data leads them to believe there was a problem with the electronic voting systems (Russia hax)

Get your popcorn guys
User avatar #136419 to #136350 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Why would she contest the election? She's already insulted Trump for doing much less, and it'd probably uncover all of the illegal voting she orchestrated.
User avatar #136422 to #136419 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
she really has nothing to lose, and everything to gain
User avatar #136423 to #136422 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Except her last shreds of dignity and any hope of escaping prison.
User avatar #136353 to #136350 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
lmao it will truly be the year of the memes if Hillary comes out and claims a rigged race

And a civil war would probably erupt too
User avatar #136376 to #136353 - nigalthornberry
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
>Claims race was rigged
>3+Million illegal votes confirmed for her
User avatar #136346 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
my black daddy is being a faggot and took down the shitposting board temporarily. You guys are lucky I have some self-control or I'd be posting anime girls on politics rn.
User avatar #136347 to #136346 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
why don't you?
User avatar #136349 to #136347 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I like my rank too much.
User avatar #136348 to #136347 - drhoffable [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
not the place for it
#136342 - drhoffable [OP]
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
this is disgusting
#136366 to #136342 - anon id: a26bbbd4
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
>"Trump and his supporters are violent and are going to kill people!"
>Angry leftists the only ones causing injury and deaths.
User avatar #136345 to #136342 - canyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Sick freaks. I do love how ambulances can't get to them when they get hurt though.
#136302 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Jokexplain
Inb4 this shit is front page bcuz people thumbs up just for the shitty drawings
User avatar #136325 to #136302 - theism
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I don't think it's a joke so much as political posturing. Basically the human character is a transsexual. The audience doesn't like transsexuals so redpanels knows if he makes them the bad guy, he doesn't have to make a good comic.
User avatar #136329 to #136325 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
can u draw
User avatar #136331 to #136329 - theism
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I don't pretend to be able to.
User avatar #136332 to #136331 - woozuh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
i bought a book called how to draw spiderman in 5th grade
i would be a master drawer by now if i hadnt spilled milk on it and ruined it
User avatar #136311 to #136302 - feelythefeel
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
The green haired person is trans, and therefore not technically a woman. The stork is metaphorically tasked with delivering babies. The trans man is triggered because the stork is unwilling to deliver a baby to him, even though he believes himself to be a woman.
User avatar #136309 to #136302 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Its pretty obvious, the stork is wary of giving the tranny a baby because he is a man. This upsets the tranny.
User avatar #136310 to #136309 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
jokexplain you suck give me your account
User avatar #136317 to #136310 - youregaylol
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
cantexplain

in case anons cant summon

fuck the post as anon button man
User avatar #136326 to #136317 - cantexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
wtf are you talking about man?
User avatar #136330 to #136326 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
jokexplain literally couldnt explain the joke

then i summoned you and you couldn't understand him not understanding the joke

all you explains are terrible at your jobs, should all be fired tbh
User avatar #136340 to #136330 - drhoffable [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
kek
User avatar #136333 to #136330 - cantexplain
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
You should be F'd in the A for being a triggered little whiny bitch on a website full of nothing in particular. Go fuck yourself. I'm out
User avatar #136334 to #136333 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
jokexplain your friend is very sensitive and cant take a little banting, is he american
#136364 to #136334 - magicexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
DID YOU SAY AMERICAN ?
User avatar #136335 to #136334 - cantexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
magicexplain check this shit out
#136363 to #136335 - magicexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
User avatar #136318 to #136317 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I inherited this account, which means more than a year ago, you did something to piss off original jokexplain. I unblock people as I find them; can't seem to mass unblock. I literally could not give half a shit. So you're unblocked now.
User avatar #136328 to #136318 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
the real joke explain would have explained it.
User avatar #136319 to #136318 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
alright thx

now give me the account.

i will do great, terrible things with it.
#136320 to #136319 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
GIF
Definitely not. I may not be original jokexplain, but I was one of the very first explains. Not gonna sell out my legacy. But you can have my 37th most favorite gif, free of charge.
User avatar #136321 to #136320 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
2late hacked

password: bootywarriorasstomouth1488

nothing personal, kid
User avatar #136324 to #136321 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
1488, of course, being the year the royal netherlands navy was founded.
User avatar #136322 to #136321 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Nope. That's from seven months ago. I change my password every week.
#136316 to #136310 - anon id: 5021b2aa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
cantexplain

in case anons cant summon
#136314 to #136310 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
A stunning offer. Let's see how that works out for him, Cotton.
#136315 to #136314 - anon id: 5021b2aa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
jokexplain blocked me because i did his job better than him

jokexplain is a feminist
User avatar #136304 to #136302 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
This is one of those artists where I just gave up

like

so much bad joke from him, I can't even. I can't even describe how much I can't.

Brain no work
#136312 to #136304 - anon id: 5021b2aa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
cantexplain
User avatar #136313 to #136312 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Shit I think he's even online right now
User avatar #136307 to #136304 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Can i talk to your supervisor or something
User avatar #136308 to #136307 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Nope. I'm the chief explain, until another explain kills me to steal my powers.

we're kind of like highlanders
User avatar #136305 to #136304 - woozuh
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Guess its time to delete your account then
User avatar #136306 to #136305 - jokexplain
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I do my best
#136297 - garymotherfingoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
How accurate is this?
User avatar #136442 to #136297 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
For one thing, there are plenty of Hawks on the Democrat side. Just look at Hillary.
User avatar #136343 to #136297 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
not very

Especially the support part. The left is mainly supported by wealthy elites now a days whereas the right is supported by the lower and middle class
User avatar #136380 to #136343 - garymotherfingoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
i believe the former is a lot closer to being true than in the past, but are you really sure about the latter? the stereotype of big money supporting the right exists for a reason, and there's a difference between just praising god-emperor Trump, and being actively/consistently right-wing.
User avatar #136384 to #136380 - drastronomy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Economically speaking, yes, rightists prefer market liberalisation, which benefits business. This does not necessarily negatively affect the working class, however. It does fuck them up, though, if it is also paired with leftist social policy and globalisation - I.e, immigration, outsourcing industry, affirmative action, etc.

Currently, large corporations are basically immune to fiscal policies, and thus do not care about leftist taxation. Thus, they aim to maximise profits by reducing the cost of production, which they do by lobbying for globalisation and policies that drive down wages, I.e third world immigration and increased advocacy for internationalist consumer culture. For international businesses, culture is simply a hindrance towards effective advertising.

Small business, however, overwhelmingly prefer rightists economic AND social policy, since it reduces competition with international firms and allows them to maximise profits because of low tax levels.
#136351 to #136343 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
How that happened, I haven't the foggiest
User avatar #136352 to #136351 - drastronomy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Hmm maybe it has to do with the fact that Clinton is a corrupt elitist bitch and that the democrats basically rigged the primaries against the candidate with perhaps the biggest appeal to the working class in several decades, along with the fact that Trump actually adresses immigration, which is perhaps the biggest threat to the working class.
User avatar #136355 to #136352 - pebar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
But even before the election, leftists were always elitist douchebags who were quick to point out that demographically, the rich and well educated agree with them while the dirty stupid poor rednecks are all republican
User avatar #136336 to #136297 - pebar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
not very
User avatar #136339 to #136336 - garymotherfingoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
kinda hopin to see how so
#136344 to #136339 - pebar
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
fair trade (as opposed to free trade) is just a buzz word to make tariffs more appealing
liberals do not care about personal freedom, they care about collective freedom (think positive vs negative liberty)
leftists think the family is an outdated concept
there are doves and hawks on both sides
leftists believe in positive right, ie you should be force to provide things for other people

Conservatives are more likely to believe moral universalism, as opposed to relativism
you can't be socialy conservative and believe in freedom at the same time
User avatar #136381 to #136344 - garymotherfingoak
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
-this tbh about fair trade
-I've seen strong examples of both from the left on both types of freedom, and is collective freedom inherently bad? that's not rhetorical, i dont know enough about it.
-what examples or trends have you seen of this? all i have to go by is anecdotes of my extended family. most if not all of them are at least decently liberal, but the value of family is something they understand like the back of their hand.
-ye
-yeah, ive seen this in a couple of forms, especially on the far left, though usually along the lines of "you should be morally obliged to, but you dont have to i guess". the persuasion is solid at worst and unyielding at most.

-relativism is very liberal, i dont know where the fuck the chart got the idea to paste it to conservatives.
-they can coexist, but not usually. It solely depends on the context of those socially conservative values.
#136295 - canyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
This kind of made up bullshit worries me.
User avatar #136434 to #136295 - Zaxplab
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
I hate the term "alt-right."

Mainly because, just like feminism, no two self-proclaiming people in that group can give you the same definition of it.
User avatar #136301 to #136295 - theism
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Which is the made up bullshit?
User avatar #136341 to #136301 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
This idea that there are two versions of the alt right, and you should only pay attention to the good version. It's ridiculous. The movement has become indefensible and Watson is trying to disassociate himself by saying he's New Right (something he just made up). He's trying to have his cake and eat it too.
User avatar #136370 to #136341 - theism
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Yeah. I don't know why he thinks "conservative that likes memes" is a political affiliation.
User avatar #136372 to #136370 - canyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Haha Harambe and Trump

#MAGA
#136337 to #136301 - canyou
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #136296 to #136295 - garymotherfingoak
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
that's a lot of alt-rights fam
User avatar #136338 to #136296 - canyou
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Then they're not really alt right
User avatar #136294 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
It kind of worries me that people actually think that Mike Pence wants to make gays straight through electro-shock therapy.
User avatar #136303 to #136294 - theism
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Mike Pence supported not ammendment to an HIV assistance bill that would devote a portion of its funding to gay conversion therapy. One method includes electroshock therapy.
User avatar #136327 to #136303 - marinepenguin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Yes. And it would be entirely voluntary obviously.

It's a bit of a backwards position to think you can change sexual orientation through any sort of therapy, but he wanted an option to be open for someone who may want to do that.
User avatar #136300 to #136294 - woozuh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
The normies need their memes..
User avatar #136299 to #136294 - figatron
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
or even that he could if he wanted to
User avatar #136289 - cleverguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
is there any legitimacy to the crazy satanism pedophile conspiracies that have been circulating here? seems like people are reading into things too much because they aren't satisfied with people being shown to be mildly corrupt, they also must be actually evil as well
User avatar #136290 to #136289 - nigalthornberry
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I mean theres some reasonable connections
User avatar #136292 to #136290 - cleverguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
they all seem pretty roundabout to me, but i havent read any of the posts too in depth because theyre usually a mess. if anything convinced you, wanna summarize?
#136285 - youregaylol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
new meme

hopefully pa betrayal is still relevant
#136283 - pebar
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Daily reminder the rise of the empire in star wars started with the taxation of trade routes
User avatar #136443 to #136283 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(11/24/2016) [-]
Daily reminder that deterministic perspectives on the fall of major empires/nation states are the very definition of retarded.
#136287 to #136283 - akkere
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
Technically it started with the Republic gradually loosening its representation of the Outer Rim worlds, allowing for the Trade Federation to sink its roots into the economies of other planets (which would later become the foundation of the Confederacy of Independent Systems).
The taxation of trade routes was more or less convenient timing - I'm not even sure I'd call it the "straw that broke the camel's back", for that would imply it catalyzed anything at all - as the Trade Federation clearly already had forces ready to mobilize long before the events of Episode I (both canon and legends more or less confirm this).
#136291 to #136287 - pebar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I disagree.
The republic was already breaking apart due to the gross inefficiencies inherent in large governments and it was only a matter of time before systems would want to succeed; this much is true.
However, the taxing of trade routes isolated the outer rim territories. Being cut off from the rest of the republic most definitely was the lead cause of the separatist movement.

I hope you appreciate this vid, it took me forever to find it
User avatar #136293 to #136291 - akkere
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
I'd argue the Outer Rim worlds were already mostly cut-off from the Republic to begin with from the inefficiencies of the Republic's system, which was due to the favoritism of the Core Worlds. The Republic was very slow (like, centuries slow) to add systems to its reach (as that would weaken the Core senators' power), leaving the Trade Federation's intergalactic banking clan to be the sole intermediary for trade, and leaving much of those free trade zones sparsely populated to begin with.

Taxing the free trade zones was definitely a hamfisted move, likely a burgeoning attempt for the Core Worlds to retain power through revenue. However, I think it was far too late in the grand scheme to be called the first step on the road to the Clone Wars, which would then lead to the rise of the Empire.

I'm a simple man: I see Star Wars references, I thumb up.
User avatar #136323 to #136293 - figatron
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(11/23/2016) [-]
It didn't help that the Republic was closer to the UN than a cohesive government where systems maintained quasi-sovereignty and before the Grand Army of the Republic conflict resolution was left to diplomatic resources and the Jedi, who couldn't have the raw numbers to effectively police the Republic, they were toothless to stop internal threats such as the trade corporations with entire fucking armies.

yay Star Wars