Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (5): akkere, lulzformalaysiaair, mixednuts, pebar, youregaylol, anonymous(15).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #76069 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
ohh boy. I hope another war happens.

Looks like Israel decided to take the opportunity to kill some Hezbollah leaders to deal a major blow to them and now retaliation will occur.

I hope shit goes down and Hezbollah gets fucked. Although I do support Assad over stupid rebels.
#76093 to #76069 - anonymous (01/19/2015) [-]
oyy vey. I hope anudda holohoax happens.

Looks like bolsheviks decided to take the opportunity to kill some germans people to deal a major blow to capitalism and now the retaliation will be a hapenning.

I hope a shoah goes down and merchants gets fucked. Although I do support Mussolin over stupid krauts.
User avatar #76094 to #76093 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
kek, I would NEVER, EVER support Bolsheviks. Germans and Nazism all the way. I'd rather have certain people suffer then everyone.
#76147 to #76094 - anonymous (01/20/2015) [-]
shem, I would NEVER, EVER, support merchants. Socialism and authoritarianism all the way. I'd rather have the state control everyone than have the great people free to show how insignificant the losers of life are.
User avatar #76076 to #76069 - byposted (01/19/2015) [-]
Israel decided to contribute, not inadvertently, to the opposition's fight. The men who died were staking out a town for enemy operatives.

Detaching Assad from Hezbollah works about as well as coupling European solidarity with Zionist struggles. Damascus would not have remained in tact, withstanding the sacrifices of Hezbollah; Hezbollah would not have maintained an armed wing, removed of Bashar Al-Assad's goodwill.

Your contradictions are the result of simple ignorance, I think. You had no exposure to Jew's role in the fall of Constantinople, which provoked you into cursing Rome - the second seat of European civilization - so it might follow that you are unaware of just how close Bashar Al-Assad and Hassan Nasrallah have been, over the years.

Whatever the case, Syrians get as much from your desultory brand of "support" as Europeans do.
User avatar #76117 to #76076 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
I already knew Hezbollah and Assad were tight, I have no idea why Israel decided to strike but the reason I enjoy the aspect of a war is because it's honestly just entertaining, I don't like boring news.

I personally don't understand what Israel gains from Assad not being in power but I disagree with them.
User avatar #76318 to #76117 - byposted (01/22/2015) [-]
I've explained it to you before. Hell, I've implied in the last post.

If Assad goes, so does Hezbollah. If Assad and Hezbollah go, Tehran's regional stature is irreparably damaged.

Israel wins on all fronts. Even where it appears that the Zionist state would lose - the further radicalization of its neighbors, it wins! This is based on three premises:

1. Israel is not militarily threatened by radical Muslim militias, notwithstanding "muh rockets."
2. Israel is militarily threatened by the competent Hezbollah and Syrian Arab Army, if only because it provides the former with advanced weaponry.
3. There is no risk, anymore, of Syria becoming a stable democracy. It's either Assad, or perpetual instability, in the example of Libya.
User avatar #76061 - beatmasterz (01/18/2015) [-]
Do you think Stalin was aware of evil he was?
#76098 to #76061 - dehumanizer (01/19/2015) [-]
Ofcousre he did, just didnt give a fuck. NOBODY stoped him.
User avatar #76077 to #76061 - byposted (01/19/2015) [-]
He recognized that his methods were harsh, but did not consider them malevolent.
User avatar #76073 to #76061 - alimais (01/18/2015) [-]
He was aware
User avatar #76070 to #76061 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
People who gain authority are generally not aware, they tend to believe that what they do is a just thing.
User avatar #76102 to #76070 - beatmasterz (01/19/2015) [-]
1984 made it seem like they don't care about the greater good and just want self gain.
User avatar #76067 to #76061 - jewishcommunazi (01/18/2015) [-]
Maybe after WW2. He got rid of most of the political persecution and Gulag'd those he thought went too far.
User avatar #76065 to #76061 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
He didn't care, psychopaths justify massive deaths with self gain.
User avatar #76101 to #76065 - beatmasterz (01/19/2015) [-]
>Implying he was a psychopath
User avatar #76105 to #76101 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
You're right. He was perfectly sane.
User avatar #76108 to #76105 - beatmasterz (01/19/2015) [-]
It's stupid to diagnose someone a psychopath like that. You have no idea what was going on in his mind.
User avatar #76109 to #76108 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
You're right. All the history gathered on him, all the people he knew, his childhood and all the actions he has done leads us to believe in nothing at all.
User avatar #76110 to #76109 - beatmasterz (01/19/2015) [-]
Alright smartass, give me evidence he was a diagnosed sociopath then.
User avatar #76115 to #76110 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
Go watch a documentary on youtube. I'm not gonna go dig through this shit for you. Hint, try typing in 'stalin documentary"
User avatar #76119 to #76115 - beatmasterz (01/19/2015) [-]
Yeah youtube is renown for its trustworthy evidence.
User avatar #76122 to #76119 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
Curious, are you a fan of Stalin?
#76059 - alimais (01/18/2015) [-]
My dog with a military cap which has the Austrian military emblem It just looks like a target
User avatar #76066 to #76059 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
>not a German Shepard

1 Reich/4 Reich
User avatar #76062 to #76059 - byposted (01/18/2015) [-]
Is he ready for Sampson Option? The Zionist regime will be so humiliated in this coming war that they will make use of their illicit nuclear arsenal, by bombing those nations which did not prevent the second coming of the Shoah™.
User avatar #76055 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
Big update regarding the Moot shilling saga.

You need to login to view this link

Basically Janitors now need to sign this agreement in order to volunteer. Which includes giving him personal information. This is probably to make it easier for him to sue when the mods do leak out his shilling tactics. Also apparently this agreement has been for a month now but Moot just today posted about it after an alleged leak.

There's more and more rumors going on that Moot is indeed intending to sell the site.
User avatar #76054 - byposted (01/18/2015) [-]
The kikes martyred Jihad Mugniyah, along with another high-ranking official of the Islamic Resistance, in an airstrike upon Syria today. My avatar used to be a portrait-like picture of his father

Retaliation has been promised. If this comes at the scale of what occurred after Abbas's death, the kikes should abandon treachery.
#76071 to #76054 - heyhowsitgoin (01/18/2015) [-]
Resistance isn't terroism
User avatar #76081 to #76071 - byposted (01/19/2015) [-]
What constitutes "terrorism" is entirely subjective to the whims of whichever state is applying the label.

Terrorism is not terrorism, so long as the "terror" is inflicted upon enemies of state policy.

Nasrallah is correct, in the video below - such terms are so arbitrary, and devoid of substance, that they should almost be embraced.

Ali Barakat - They called us terrorists | علي بركات | نشيد - سمونا ارهابيه
0
#76079 to #76071 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76068 to #76054 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
>selling out to the muslims because you have no faith in your own people

User avatar #76072 to #76068 - byposted (01/18/2015) [-]
Supporting a natural ally is not betrayal. When your people welcomed the Turks into Constantinople, they felt it just, for the Greeks, wise to their ways, had prevented them from holding any dominion over the people. The Sultans would make amends to these centuries of constraint by granting the Jews free reign over Christian subjects.

You understood that the Jews were the enemies of Europe, but wrote "fuck Rome," in our last discussion. You did not revise your position on pogroms conducted against the Jews, which were typically justified from the perspective of European nationalism. You reasoned that while only some Jews - "liberal Jews" - are the problem, all Muslims are. What is all this about?

As far as I see it, the only sell-outs are Zionist-friendly nationalists, who are stuck in the geopolitics of the Medieval Ages. They see a "Muslim invasion," but it is actually an invitation. The Jews are signing the welcome cards.
User avatar #76074 to #76072 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
I find these "are all Jews bad" discussions kinda pointless because I just don't agree with your view of history. You haven't and probably won't be able to provide me enough evidence to believe this.
User avatar #76082 to #76074 - byposted (01/19/2015) [-]
I can direct you to nearly any book which touches on the fall of Constantinople. Visit your local library, check out one such work, look up "Jews" in the index, follow the text from there, and you will find that my "view" of history is the conservative.

What do you "disagree" with? Is it unbelievable that the Jews detested the Byzantines, and their Russian cousins, for denying themselves power? Or is it unlikely that the Jews would go so far as to rally on Islamic invaders, similarly to how, in Russia, they would cheer on the Japanese, and other enemies of the Tsar?

Provide me with a reasonable doubt and I will grant you reasonable sources.

The other day, you doubted that Poles in Western Europe behave immodestly. It is common knowledge, like the history I write. Every sizable Polish minority, in Western Europe, has sizable criminal elements.

Go on Stormfront Britain and take a gander at all the threads complaining about Poles. I'm actually not certain if the moderation allows such discussion anymore, given enforcement of the rule that Whites should not ridicule other Whites based on differing ethnicity. They are missing the point, however, in insisting that all hatred be directed towards brown people. Immigrants will be immigrants. In similar fashion, Jews will be Jews.

Alternately, you can look up "Polish criminality in Western Europe." I found this article:

www.express.co.uk/news/uk/527589/Scotland-full-of-eastern-European-criminals
User avatar #76118 to #76082 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/19/2015) [-]
Yeah I would actually like to read up on the fall of Constantinople. Any recommendations? The shorter the better.

>What do you "disagree" with? Is it unbelievable that the Jews detested the Byzantines, and their Russian cousins, for denying themselves power? Or is it unlikely that the Jews would go so far as to rally on Islamic invaders, similarly to how, in Russia, they would cheer on the Japanese, and other enemies of the Tsar?

What for me is so hard to believe is that the claim that Jews almost act as 1. What you're basically saying is all Jews at the time thought and did the same thing, like they could telekinetically communicate and establish goals. I just find that very hard to believe.

>It is common knowledge, like the history I write. Every sizable Polish minority, in Western Europe, has sizable criminal elements.

OK I believe you, how does this make you feel though? Being Polish.
User avatar #76317 to #76118 - byposted (01/22/2015) [-]
If you would like a concise analysis of the Jewish community, before and after Constantinople's fall, I would recommend The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic by Stanford J. Shaw.

Mr. Shaw is Jewish, and even favorably reviewed by a fellow Jew, as you can see on Amazon. He omits none of the history I have told you, and, in fact, delves into it head-first.

Jewish synthases was a product of the time and place. I understand that there is less mutual understanding amongst Jews now - but, this, too, is a matter of location and period.

The "Greek" or "Anatolian" Jewish community was tightly-knit, for many of the same reasons as the "Russian." That is, they lived in close proximity to each other, maintained a common faith, identified a common foe, and, by confluence, natural allies.

-

It is my philosophy that immigrants will be immigrants. If a large amount of foreigners are allowed access into a nation, within the span of decades, there is clearly little selection involved in the process. In other words, there is no "discrimination." Poor behavior is to be expected amongst such foreign lots, as once was with roaming, barbarian tribes.

When I say that Islam is not at fault for the actions of Arab immigrants, I do not mean that the Arab immigrants are not, themselves, at fault. They are. But so are we, for, namely, not maintaining a sustainable fertility rate.

Where will Europe get if its "saviors" are railing against a mere religion? Implicit in it is leftist environmental determinism! I spoke of this in regard to Charlie Hebdo. The editors of that magazine disliked Islam not because of its association with mass-immigration, but because they saw in it a traditional lifestyle, not open to homosexuals and assorted degenerates.

Are we supposed to believe that Arab immigrants, in Western Europe, would behave better if they were atheists? No matter - we are not about integration, but national purification. My argument has always been about rhetoric. If this does not address our goals, it will not meet them!

Is our purpose to realize the leftist "diversity" dream? Of course not, but rightist parties covey that end. They do it, for instance, when they rail against Islam's "oppression of women." Do we support the Sexual Revolution? When conservatives appeal for feminists to join in on their bashing of Islam, they behave hypocritically. For who is our greater enemy: immigrants of opportunity, or subterfuges of destructive design?

I am not offended that many Poles are a disgrace to their nation. In Poland, Russians are renowned for being a disgrace to theirs, all the same. There is a law at work - immigrants will be immigrants. It relates to several others, which explains my view towards Jews.
0
#76075 to #76074 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#76060 to #76057 - byposted (01/18/2015) [-]
Three IDF vehicles allegedly targeted in the occupied Golan Heights.
0
#76058 to #76057 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#76051 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
Target closing in Canada, 133 stores. Why? Because literally everyone goes to Walmart. It's always filled with people, Target has worse quality for higher prices. Can't complete so it's always empty.

User avatar #76052 to #76051 - akkere ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
I recall reading how they also had poor supply upkeep. If you don't have product to sell, you might as well not be in business at all.
It's kind of weird because it's the exact opposite over here. A bit better quality, bit higher prices, and relatively substantial upkeep of goods to sell. Plus the people in Walmart are absolute shit-tier to deal with. I have no idea how it's like in Canada, but over here it's like Walmart is the pilgrimage for all landwhales and their neurotic children who run around like it's a goddamn playground. I remember a post on the front page saying how people go to Target to pay a bit more than Walmart to not deal with being in a Walmart.
User avatar #76064 to #76052 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
Yeah it's not the same here. I don't see landwhales in my community and all the Walmart workers are Philippino (southeastern asians). Same for all fast food places.
#76056 to #76052 - anonymous (01/18/2015) [-]
Sounds like Target is to Canada what K-Mart is to the United States. K-Mart has had that same array of problems here that Target had in Canada.
#76001 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
IT'S HARD TO FAT BEN'S POOP WHEN A FAT BEN'S POOP DIDN'T FAT BEN'S POOP ON A FAT BEN'S POOP WITH A FAT BEN'S POOP
User avatar #76008 to #76001 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Are you really that bored?
#76025 to #76008 - youregaylol (01/17/2015) [-]
hes been going at it on and off for a few years now
User avatar #76026 to #76025 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
I'm seeing that, a lot.
User avatar #76038 to #76026 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
He's like part of us.
#76040 to #76038 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
"us"

implying you're not a newfag
User avatar #76042 to #76040 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Heh that kinda makes me feel special, no matter how pathetic that sounds.
User avatar #76041 to #76040 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Oh
#75972 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
jaysonlusk.com/blog/2015/1/15/food-demand-survey-foods-january-2015

This is a good glimpse at how ill informed most food labeling proponents are.
User avatar #76011 to #75972 - Shiny (01/17/2015) [-]
So... we shouldn't label foods?
#76044 to #76011 - anonymous (01/18/2015) [-]
I was being rash. GMO hysteria really pisses me off.
#75970 - dehumanizer (01/17/2015) [-]
>I support Israel.
User avatar #76010 to #75970 - Shiny (01/17/2015) [-]
Supporting Israel is almost entirely a neoconservative thing.
User avatar #76319 to #76010 - unforgivenfive (01/22/2015) [-]
libertarian fag here..moving to israel in 6 months.
User avatar #75989 to #75970 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Hey man, you can shitpost all you want on /religion/ but please not here. Please.
#76046 to #75989 - dehumanizer (01/18/2015) [-]
>every critique of israel is shitposting

nah, get gassed, FREEDOM OF SPEACH!
User avatar #76048 to #76046 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
Well you didn't present any arguments man, you literally shitposted. If you would have actually given a reason instead of a fatass in a fedora it wouldn't have been downthumbed.
#76049 to #76048 - dehumanizer (01/18/2015) [-]
>You didn't present any arguments man, you literally shitposted.
User avatar #76050 to #76049 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
If you don't believe a picture of a fedora fagget with "> I support Israel" isn't shitposting would be the same with a leftist and "i support palestine" then you're an idiot.
#76053 to #76050 - dehumanizer (01/18/2015) [-]
>fedoraposting
>shitposting

2 difffrent things
User avatar #76063 to #76053 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/18/2015) [-]
I'm sorry to tell you this sir, but it's not.
#76095 to #76063 - dehumanizer (01/19/2015) [-]
no you see, anti-semitism is on a the rise again, leave this site and go to israel!
#75973 to #75970 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
#75974 to #75973 - dehumanizer (01/17/2015) [-]
>I dont belive in Conspiracies.
#75975 to #75974 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
lel

Most le euphoric fedoramen revel in conspiracy theories.
Get your strawmen straight.
#75971 to #75970 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
>I SUPPORT FAT BEN
User avatar #76047 to #75959 - vitunhenkka (01/18/2015) [-]
oh i miss the old days when you could just whack the shit out of those hippies
#76039 to #75959 - klowserpok (01/17/2015) [-]
God job America.
God job America.
AMERICANS CLAPPING PART 3 NOW WITH ACTUAL BURGERS [EXCLUSIVE] [SWAG]
User avatar #76030 to #75959 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
I would struggle not to fire into the crowd if I were a cop in that position.
#75992 to #75959 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
I wish for the death of these people. I truly, truly do.
#75990 to #75959 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
ohh my god this is just disgusting, this is just disgusting. I mean this is a disgrace!

Where are the parents! Where are the parents of these craps I mean this is what america has turned out to be for Christ sakes!

A sick, disgusting, twisted version of itself.

I mean this is america! this is what it's turned out to be I'm not joking! Good god ahhhh
User avatar #75964 to #75959 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
merica
#75965 to #75964 - youregaylol (01/17/2015) [-]
"fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you fuck you *pokes* fuck you fuck you fuck you *pussy kick* *gets choked"-quote from bitch choked
User avatar #75967 to #75965 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
I just want to kill these people.
Al-Qawlu Qawlu Sawarim-Nasheed
#75968 to #75967 - youregaylol (01/17/2015) [-]
theres no time like the present

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_bomb
User avatar #75955 - PopcornViking (01/17/2015) [-]
how can one support israel but not support sanctions on iran

is that even possible
User avatar #75956 to #75955 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Honestly I do fear Iran. I do believe they'd be the type of extremists to accidentally give a nuclear weapon to Hezbollah.
User avatar #75963 to #75956 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Nope, they are not the same type of muslims.
User avatar #76043 to #75963 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
btw shia extremists exist too.
User avatar #75986 to #75963 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Yeah I know they're shia. I've just seen the type of things their presidents have said.
User avatar #75977 to #75963 - PopcornViking (01/17/2015) [-]
i thought it was proved that hamas was getting some of its weapons from iran

iran only hates ISIS
User avatar #75979 to #75977 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
They have a common enemy.
User avatar #75987 to #75979 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Yep which is exactly why I don't trust them.
User avatar #75978 to #75977 - PopcornViking (01/17/2015) [-]
ignore that second part
User avatar #75925 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
What do you have against monarchies FJ /pol/?
User avatar #76023 to #75925 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Now you're backtracking. Monarchies were a good system that has worked well in the past in many ways. Although there are many downfalls, like once the ruler dies and their generals fight over his land (alexander, Khan) ultimately leading to the destruction of the entire empire. Civil wars by sibling rivals (very popular in Rome), and also power struggles. In modern times, governing through family rule is really quite a dumb idea. The only reason Saudi Arabia still has a king is because of their oil wealth keeps my the people relatively happy and allowing other nations to not oppose them so they can access their oil riches.
User avatar #76024 to #76023 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Power struggles happen in democracies too, the only reason they are not effective is the reason democracy is not effect. Take this, our country was the strongest during the reign of kings and during the SFRJ, not it's democratic, and a piece of shit.
Funny thing is that all Alexander had to do was to name his sucessor, the fighting came after the downfall of the empire where his closest companions divided the empire. He should have just gave it to the strongest .
Khan died and didn't also name the man who's going to be the next great khan, fucking hell why didn't he name Subotai.
> governing through family rule is really quite a dumb idea.
rothchild.jpg
User avatar #76027 to #76024 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Power struggles can happen in any kind of government. I wasn't saying that they were exclusive to monarchies. My point is that most monarchies don't have a backup system if the king dies beyond "eldest son, wife, or only child". If the leader hasn't designated an heir there's likely to be infighting.

Ever since Greece fell to the Romans and then the Ottomans they haven't been in good shape. Their style of governement has little to do with it. They simply haven't had the ability to be anything other then a pawn to larger powers in modern politics.
User avatar #76028 to #76027 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
True.
Well, one thing is sure, the democracies and city states were divided until the Macedonians united them, they were far better under the rule of dictators than demagogues and they have been always bad when it comes to money.
User avatar #76029 to #76028 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
In the history of Greece that's true. In the history of every other nation that's not so true.

As much as I've been taught growing up that "democracy/republics are the best form of government", I know there's no such thing as the best form of government. That's up for debate as t what the "best" is. Especially as we are growing so large in number and may eventually become a multiplanet species.
#76031 to #76029 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Mostly depends on the person in the end, I want to make the ruler of a nation the ultimate servant, so I give him the ultimate power. To treat his nation like his family, not his niggers
But seriously, we were a powerhouse in the middle ages
User avatar #76032 to #76031 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
That's the problem though. If all who ruled were ruling in the interest of the people, then it wouldn't matter what form of government was involved. Monarchy, Fascism, Dictatorships, Republics, etc, would all work excellently. But we don't live in a world where all rulers are good men.

In nations where one man has ultimate power, it may prosper under a good man, while a bad one could ruin it easily.

In nations where many men rule as representatives, you can try to vote in men who you believe are good and hope that enough are good to cancel out the evil men in it for the power. but those are much more susceptible to corruption.
User avatar #76033 to #76032 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Kill all jews niggers spics muzzies bad people?
User avatar #76034 to #76033 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
In my opinion that's why we should try to create a culture where we're interdependent, disciplined, and conduct ourselves with respect. Like the governement in tge movie starship troopers, except maybe not so authoritarian. Very similar to fascism.
#76035 to #76034 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Where to start?
User avatar #76036 to #76035 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Mandatory military service, OR, joining the military is optional, but being a military vet grants you full citizenship and more rights and privileges.
User avatar #76037 to #76036 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
nice
User avatar #76012 to #75925 - Shiny (01/17/2015) [-]
We in America used to live under a monarchy. It didn't work well... at all.
User avatar #76014 to #76012 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Because?
User avatar #76016 to #76014 - Shiny (01/17/2015) [-]
Because giving one person an excessive amount of power is a horrible idea.
User avatar #76018 to #76016 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
No, tell me what did the bad king do?
User avatar #76020 to #76018 - Shiny (01/17/2015) [-]
No real point in explaining further to the kind of guy who types "I will fucking kill you." to contrary Internet opinions.
User avatar #76021 to #76020 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Please do.
User avatar #75957 to #75925 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Fascism is one thing, if you really want a monarchy you're brain dead.
User avatar #75960 to #75957 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Instead of meming can you explain why?
User avatar #75988 to #75960 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
I think it's been explained well below and if you can't find reasons on your own then you are retarded schnizel, seriously.
User avatar #75994 to #75988 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Where? Instead of name calling why don't you form an argument?
User avatar #75995 to #75994 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
All the comments below. You've already seen them.
User avatar #75996 to #75995 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Shit tier at best.
User avatar #75997 to #75996 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
a. no consequence to actions
b. spoiled his/her entire life and then rules over a country with no education, basically got lucky
c. opposes individual freedom greatly
d. hasn't worked out well in the past... i wonder why

This is more then enough, one of these reasons is more then enough.
#75998 to #75997 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
1.Yes, there are consequences for his actions.
2.He has a large group of advisors and his father was the rulers, basically he is born to bear the burden. You think ruling a country is easy? Conquering the world on horseback is easy; it is dismounting and governing that is hard. Genghis Khan
3. What the fuck are you talking about nigger, kings only care about you paying taxes to them, they would on no level spy or fuck you up like in todays world. Nigga, freedom to do what?
4.>>Analyzing Abu Dhabi’s excellent assessment of Polish Kings, I get 250 out of 835 years of bad monarchs, or a 30% failure ratio by time. 18 individual monarchs out of 48, or a 37.5% failure rate by person.
>Previously, in Monarchy FAQ, I estimated a 12% failure rate by time for Austrian monarchs, a 10% failure rate by time for Prussian monarchs, and a 9% failure rate by time for French Bourbon monarchs.
>This is more then enough, one of these reasons is more then enough.
<
User avatar #75999 to #75998 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
1. no

2. it's the roll of a dice, you're not always gonna get a good ruler. What if you get a psychopath like the Roman Empire got so many times? Ohh too bad I guess, the country and people suffer.

3.
>kings only care about you paying taxes to them
Are you trying to prove my point? This isn't a good thing

> freedom to do what?
Monarchies have a history of oppressing people and things, you should know

4. I have no idea what this "failure rate" is and what it implies. I also don't know who the guy in the picture is...

#76000 to #75999 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
1.Nigger, how no? His life literally depends on his rule?
2.And I love it how everyone loves democracy and it works perfectly with no lies, power grabbing and corruption.
>Marcus Aurelius FTW
>Are you trying to prove my point? This isn't a good thing
Why, you pay taxes to him and he removes kebab so the kebab doesn't remove you.
>Monarchies have a history of oppressing people and things, you should know
>implying anyone with any political power does that
State the reason for those opressions please.
>4. I have no idea what this "failure rate" is and what it implies. Oh, Bosnian SS.
Basically if the rule was good or bad.
User avatar #76002 to #76000 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
1. His life is a ruler. It doesn't depend on whether he rules well or not, as long as he is happy and sustains it is all that matters. You seem to be forgetting what a monarchy is. A dictatorship, absolute rule by 1 person/his family.

2. Democracy has it's flaws, I agree. I can't even tell what I am now a days, a libertarian with conservative values or a fascist. But monarchy is way overboard. It's just a much worse version of fascism.

3. >Why, you pay taxes to him and he removes kebab so the kebab doesn't remove you.
Removing kebab can be done with fascism, it doesn't need a failed, worse system.

>State the reason for those oppression please.
You like to dig through this information, go look at the various ways different monarchies have done that.

>Basically if the rule was good or bad.
What is the objective evidence of if it is good or bad, what decides this?
User avatar #76003 to #76002 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
>It doesn't depend on whether he rules well or not, as long as he is happy and sustains it is all that matters.
That's your own subjective opinion. I can name you kings that would dwarf all politicians of today.
>It's just a much worse version of fascism.
Looks like Monaco is a hell hole and the peoples republic of China is a dreamland.
>You like to dig through this information, go look at the various ways different monarchies have done that.
Yes.
>What is the objective evidence of if it is good or bad, what decides this?
Wars, keeping the country stable, low or no corruption, noble deeds, etc.
User avatar #76004 to #76003 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
Comparing Monaco to China is pretty retarded.
User avatar #76005 to #76004 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
One is a monarchy and the other is a, democracy.
User avatar #76006 to #76005 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
First off, China is communist. Not democratic.

2nd, China is one of the largest and most populous nations on the planet that has only recently been anything resembling a first world nation. While Monaco is only a few miles across with only a few people in a region that has not seen much warfare. Most small nations like that, regardless of how it's ruled, tend to be more prosperous and have a higher quality of life. Once you start governing hundreds of millions and even billions of people, that's when you start getting into good arguments over what the best way to rule that massive number of people is.
User avatar #76009 to #76007 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
There are democratic movements in China, but the country is still Communist and authoritarian in nature. Why do you think the people in Hong Kong were protesting so much? In a few years their democracy will be evaporated and communist state leaders will be put in place.

Even IF China was still democratic, comparing it to a nation-state like Monaco is stupid.
User avatar #76022 to #76015 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
That's a better comparison.
User avatar #76013 to #76009 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Why? Is it because China is a big guy ? He can take it
User avatar #76017 to #76013 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
I already explained why.

Little populations are easy to rule regardless of government. Large populations are incredibly difficult to properly govern and lead.
User avatar #76019 to #76017 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
Khan did well, so did Octavian, so did Charlemagne,etc.
User avatar #75961 to #75950 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
They do, it's usually with their life.
User avatar #75976 to #75961 - pebar ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
So the king answers to some higher authority? Who?
The people? A council?

Either way then it's not a monarchy.
User avatar #75980 to #75976 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
To death.
#75981 to #75980 - pebar ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
And what motivation does death have to serve his country?
User avatar #75984 to #75981 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
click on the link below
User avatar #75982 to #75981 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
To kill.
#75983 to #75982 - pebar ONLINE (01/17/2015) [-]
So death is motivated by killing?
Does killing serve the country?
User avatar #75985 to #75983 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
>gas chambers
User avatar #75949 to #75925 - mixednuts (01/16/2015) [-]
They're the real welfare queens.
User avatar #75962 to #75949 - schnizel (01/17/2015) [-]
How so?
User avatar #75948 to #75925 - klowserpok (01/16/2015) [-]
Nothing.
I think a constitutional monarchy is a good idea.
User avatar #75936 to #75925 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Because it's a form of despotism which is inherently opposed to individual freedom.
User avatar #75940 to #75939 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Lol i hate Democracy too tho.
User avatar #75941 to #75940 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
And what do you love, besides me of course.
User avatar #75942 to #75941 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Freedums
#75954 to #75944 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
he doesn't look very Japanese
User avatar #75946 to #75944 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Them eyebrows tho
User avatar #75947 to #75946 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
Totalitarian.
#75953 to #75943 - anonymous (01/17/2015) [-]
Fats are not freedom.
Fats are prisoners in a cage of cellulite
User avatar #75926 to #75925 - jewishcommunazi (01/16/2015) [-]
Should someone be the rightful leader of a country simply because he got lucky with his parents? I say hell no.
User avatar #75927 to #75926 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
Knock knock.
User avatar #75928 to #75927 - jewishcommunazi (01/16/2015) [-]
Who's there?
#75917 - pebar ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
edition.cnn.com/2015/01/15/world/belgium-anti-terror-operation/

the happening is going to begin any moment now
#75932 to #75917 - anonymous (01/16/2015) [-]
Isn't it incredibly rare for Belgian police to kill?

I didn't think they even carried guns.
#75921 to #75917 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
This makes me nervous since my country is right above belgium.
User avatar #75933 to #75921 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
Portugal?
User avatar #75935 to #75934 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
scroll up
User avatar #75937 to #75935 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
I still don't get it.
User avatar #75938 to #75937 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
me neither
#75916 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Love this.
#75924 to #75916 - anonymous (01/16/2015) [-]
Maybe we could become more like another northern country famous for its oil money and start deporting illegals instead of asking for more.
User avatar #75945 to #75924 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Maybe we shouldn't accept any immigrants from africa/middle east.
#75918 to #75915 - pebar ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
“Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.”    
– Dr. Unni Wikan, Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo   
   
good lord
“Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.”
– Dr. Unni Wikan, Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo

good lord
User avatar #75951 to #75918 - feelythefeel (01/16/2015) [-]
Why does anyone even let this happen?
#75931 to #75918 - anonymous (01/16/2015) [-]
Multiculturalism: How to use foreigners to oppress your own people.
User avatar #75930 to #75918 - schnizel (01/16/2015) [-]
This kill the white.....
#75913 - youregaylol (01/16/2015) [-]
For the life of me I can't find any similarities between any of these fugitives.

stophoustongangs.org/default.aspx?menuitemid=767&menugroup=Home
User avatar #75914 to #75913 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/16/2015) [-]
Ha I get the joke, they're all fucking mexicans aren't they?

Look at this shit
>Latin kings the most disgusting of them all
>La Primera
> LaTercera Crips
>Southwest Cholos
>Puro Vato Loco
User avatar #75896 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
So Japan is truly becoming militarized once again. They're building carriers that displace around 27,000 tons and are around 258 meters long. Not as big as the US's by any means, but still impressive compared to most of the world. I'm glad they're rearming, they're a vital ally to the US and I feel like we'll need as many of those as possible in the coming years. Britain, Japan, South Korea, Australia, France (iffy on that one) and Germany are probably the only countries I'd trust in the long run.
User avatar #76045 to #75896 - PopcornViking (01/18/2015) [-]
should some WW3 bullshit ever break out

India will be the most important country for either side to persuade to join them
#75902 to #75896 - youregaylol (01/15/2015) [-]
Realistically the US doesn't really need it's allies in regards to them building up larger militaries, we just need their land and resources.
User avatar #75903 to #75902 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Well no. The US mainland won't be in any danger anytime soon purely because of our nuclear arsenal and naval capabilities.

But having allies is always a strategic plus.
#75904 to #75903 - youregaylol (01/15/2015) [-]
Well yes.

1.5 million active duty personnel with 850k reserves, 5 million reaching military age annually and 120 million fit for service.

More than 8,000 tanks comprised of 25k AFV's, 2k SPG's, 2k Artillery, and 1500 MLRS.

17K aircrafts comprised of more than 2k fighter jets, 2k fixed attacked aircrafts, 5k transport aircrafts, 6k helicopters,1k attack helicopters, and 1k training aircrafts.

500 strong navy comprised (not including auxiliaries) of 10 aircraft carriers (one aircraft carrier can wipe out a small country), 15 frigates, 62 destroyers, 72 submarines, 13 CDC's, and 13 Mine Warfare.

Not to mention the vast support system at home. We could wipe out all life in the world in less than a year, occupy the entire first world in 10, and successfully colonize africa completely in 5.
User avatar #75906 to #75904 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Except that we risk making other nuclear capable nations use their nuclear capabilities, in which case our sheer numbers would mean nothing. Every other nation on the planet against us would give them a MASSIVE numerical advantage. India and China alone are 12 times our size.

We don't have the economical ability, the want, or the need to even attempt something like that. I think you are a little overconfident in our military and our economy. I'd say in maybe 100 years, if we turn that land over to our side and then develop it to aid in the war effort.
#75907 to #75906 - youregaylol (01/15/2015) [-]
If we're considering the nuclear option then why are you pining for japan to get more ships, would that somehow stop the bomb more than our ships would? Of course the nuclear option matters, but we still have enough nukes to destroy the entire world, so whats your point? The only way japans ships would matter is if we were using them in a non nuclear war, which is what we're talking about, stay on topic.

And I'm afraid you don't understand how modern war works. The number of human beings a nation has hasn't mattered for a few centuries. If it did then China and India would be the super powers, as you pointed out. What really matters is technology, strategy, and resource. Britain as a small island nation dominated the entire world.

We certainly have the economic ability to attempt a large scale war, why does the want or the need matter, we're not talking about that. You're massively underestimating the most powerful military force in history. We can certainly take on any nation on this earth easily. Of course this would never happen because of the nuclear option, but once again that's not what we're talking about because japan having a few more ships isn't going to change that.
User avatar #75908 to #75907 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Okay then fine. Take away the nuclear option.

What happens when we attempt to take over the planet, assuming there are no nukes.

The US has the greatest overall technology, trained and equipped troops, ability to feed, transport, and supply troops across the planet. Combine that with our air power, modern armors record in plains, and navies ability to eliminate other naval threats, and you don't have another nation that measures up. We're also one of the best at taking our resources and implementing them, and we have a LOT of resources. If we played it right we could very easily dominate the sea, and the air all across the globe due to our aircraft carriers and our air force. Most 3rd world countries would fall immediately with little more then a push. But then we have to have an extended campaign against China, Russia, India, Israel, Canada, Mexico, AND all of Europe at the same time. That is a lot of fronts. And at that point I don't care how many tactical teams you have, those numbers would simply overwhelm us. We'd deliver vastly more damage to them then they would us. But in the end we couldn't take on the entirety of the world AT ONCE. We'd be unable to supply all our troops efficiently, and we'd collapse under the strain.


Let's assume that we somehow pull through and manage to destroy the rest of the world militarily. Now what?

People wouldn't just lie down, there'd be uprisings, rebellions, guerilla warfare, etc. The amount of manpower and money needed to hold that all together and keep the world United under our power would be way beyond our capabilities. The strain would be too much.

This is if we did it all at once.

Now if we formed a Union with NATO under one banner, it'd be easy peasy.
#75909 to #75908 - youregaylol (01/15/2015) [-]
In a global war we could immediately shut off world trade. In the end all you need is sea and air, but even with sea and air we still have the advantage on land with our huge support system. Any country that doesn't completely support itself would be forced to surrender or slowly deteriorate into chaos. All we would have to do is invade the resource centers of the and hold them and thats it, game over.

Analyzing the most extreme option aside, how does japan having more ships help us in a realistic conventional war? You're focusing on the example I used for emphasis. We're not trying to occupy the entire world militarily, we don't need too because the entire first world is already in our pocket and all we need is the first world. A more realistic war would be one with North Korea or Iran, and assuming the paranoid people are correct Russia and China.

We could easily handle all of those threats, so how does japan having a military effect those scenarios? Realistically they contribute nothing to the current balance of power which is completely in our favor. We don't need their ships, we just need their trade and their bases.
User avatar #75910 to #75909 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
It helps us in the fact that we can use their ships instead of ours. Gets the job we need done, without using our ships and men. Saves us money.

Having allies that can take care of themselves takes the burdenoff us to completely defend our interests there. Japan making more ships is just helping with the process of a self sustaining and more capable Japan. Which is good for our interest there.
#75958 to #75910 - cabbagemayhem (01/17/2015) [-]
You seem to assume they would never use their ships against us.
User avatar #75901 to #75896 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
OH and Canada is cool too. Sorry Lulz.
#75911 to #75901 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
You better be motherfucker. sorry
User avatar #75912 to #75911 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
sorry

sorry
User avatar #75900 to #75896 - schnizel (01/15/2015) [-]
That's nice dear.
#75879 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
From Ron Paul's official FB page.

He knows.
User avatar #75897 to #75879 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
You live in the netherlands right? Why do you care so much? I suppose I shouldn't be talking because I live in canadia but still curious
User avatar #75898 to #75897 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
US politics is much more interesting, plus whatever happens to the US has impact on European countries.
User avatar #75899 to #75898 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
same reasons4me
User avatar #75880 to #75879 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
That is amazing. I'd vote for him because of his foreign policy, and his amazing understanding of the constitution. His social stances are a bit backwards though.
User avatar #75884 to #75880 - pebar ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
What social stances do you have a problem with?
User avatar #75894 to #75884 - lulzformalaysiaair ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Abortion is the only one for me. I dont care about gay marriage.
User avatar #75887 to #75884 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
His stance on womens rights is pretty backwards for today. He's been quoted saying that women who are victims of "honest rape" should go to the emergency room and get a shot of estrogen. He doesn't want to allow women to have abortions.

Stuff like that.
User avatar #75886 to #75884 - schnizel (01/15/2015) [-]
The backwards ones.
User avatar #75873 - studbeefpile ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Pull the Trigger on every Nigger.
#75893 to #75873 - anonymous (01/15/2015) [-]
Pull the trigger on every nigger,
and every white guy who wants to be wigger.
I'm race-traitor eviscerator.
White on the outside I don't give
Black inside, don't let 'em live
Shame the white race, get put in your place, without a trace.
On a tree or underground
Moonman will get you without a sound.
User avatar #75891 to #75873 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Pull the Nigger on every Nigger.
User avatar #75892 to #75891 - schnizel (01/15/2015) [-]
Pul the Nigger on Nigger Nigger.
User avatar #75952 to #75892 - feelythefeel (01/16/2015) [-]
Nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger.

Dis be real rap, now.
#75872 - anonymous (01/15/2015) [-]
www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30799373

God has answered our prayers.
User avatar #75883 to #75872 - akkere ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
This might complicate things a bit more for the Republican party than improve it, mostly because of the divide that was already shaping up between Bush and Rand, but now it's in a three way divide (according to a poll in Iowa at least, where Romney admittedly made it higher up).
Poll: www.courier-journal.com/story/politics-blog/2015/01/15/iowa-poll-shows-mitt-romney-and-jeb-bush-leading-with-rand-paul-in-the-middle-of-the-pack/21802831/
User avatar #75881 to #75872 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
I don't know whether I like or hate Mitt. Under his leadership we'd probably see the wealthy pull away from the middle class even more then normal, but our foreign policy would improve so fricken much.
User avatar #75885 to #75881 - pebar ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Sen. Ted Cruz: "The Obama economic agenda has exacerbated income inequality"
User avatar #75888 to #75885 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Honestly I'm at the point to where I think that the wealthy are going to continue to pull away and we can't stop it. They can throw a lot of money into campaigns for what they want, lobby for certain things to get passed, and just get things put their way much more effectively then most common people can. I don't think that Democrats or Republicans are willing to fix that.
User avatar #75889 to #75888 - pebar ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Thus it would only make sense that since government is so prone to corruption, government should be limited so that the effect of the corruption would be minimal.
User avatar #75890 to #75889 - marinepenguin ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
There will always be corruption, no matter the size of government.

I agree that our current government is too bloated and overreaching with it's power. It should really only be an organization that manages and unites the states, organizes and leads the military, and creates and executes laws. I'm all for more states rights.
#75878 to #75872 - pebar ONLINE (01/15/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
 Friends (0)