Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (1): shekelnator, anonymous(35).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#115742 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
Who would win in a fight? Hulk Hogan and Obama, or 3 Hitlers?
#115770 to #115742 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(05/11/2016) [-]
HULK
U
L
K
#115750 to #115742 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
How old are the 3 Hitlers? If he's post WW1 Hitler I think all 3 of them could take on Hogan.
#115773 to #115750 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(05/11/2016) [-]
Hitler:
5ft 8 in
155 lbs

Hulk Hogan:
6ft 6in
340 lbs

3 manlets taking on the mountain? naw dude
#115775 to #115773 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
Hogan didn't hash it out in the Trenches of the first world war, and if gas didn't kill Hitler some hasbeen wrestler won't either.
#115776 to #115775 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(05/11/2016) [-]
Can you tell me why Hitler didn't join the Austrian military service?

Also, mustard gas was only lethal in 1% of cases. Hitler is no special boy.
#115746 to #115742 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(05/11/2016) [-]
Metallica  Blitzkrieg
Hulk Hogan could take on 3 Hitlers himself. Unless the Hitler's use their special abilities, blitzkrieg.

Even then who knows, 3 concentrated blitzkriegs may not work on a Real American.
#115743 to #115742 - anon
Reply +2
(05/11/2016) [-]
The Hulkster.
#115739 - anon
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115738 - anon
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115735 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
I'm honestly surprised Obama will not apologize for the bombing of Hiroshima when he's going to visit the city in the coming weeks.

That would be extremely embarrassing, so hey gotta give him credit for not doing that. Though setting the bar for credit this low is embarrassing in itself.

On a side note, how come Hiroshima flourished after getting nuked yer Detroit went to shit even though it had a head start? Is it really due to democratic policy? which is what I hear from conservatives, since apparently Detroit starting going to shit when democrats took control
#115741 to #115735 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
As long as Japan refuses to admit their war crimes and apologize for Pearl Harbor i think it's right for Obama not to apologize. But this visit is nonetheless important for the issue of how dangerous atomic bombs are for humanity.

As for Detroit. The main reason is terrible management on economic and political management by Democrats. The population of Detroit has declined massively, 60% in 60 years. Which means far less tax revenue. But rather than cutting spending to make taxes revenue neutral they went on a massive borrowing spree and created new taxes while refusing to cut spending due to pressure by labour unions.

I'm oversimplifying things a lot but that's the general principle behind it, here's a more detailed story (The one of the Detroit Free Press site doesn't link for some reason)
taxfoundation.org/blog/detroit-free-press-explains-why-detroit-went-bankrupt

The issue with cities like Baltimore and Detroit is that they're extremely heavily skewed towards the left. Democrats have held complete monopoly over them for decades thanks to their ability to stir racial conflict and false promises so running as a Republican there is pretty much akin to running as a third party. And yet despite voting for them over and over and over it's not going to get better. These cities have trapped themselves into an unbalanced ideological monopoly that is down-spiraling themselves by doing the same reckless policies. Either Democrats need to get their shit together or they need to swallow their pride and try Republican.
#115754 to #115741 - theism
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
The problem is the industry of these cities collapsed when manufacturing moved out of the country.
#115748 to #115741 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
What is the best way to fix cities like Detroit or Baltimore? I've been to Baltimore once and I literally feared for my fucking life the 20 minutes I spent outside with my family (not during the tour guide) but at night going out to eat, horrible experience.
#115777 to #115748 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
At this point it's going to take a long ass time to improve it, especially with Detriot's debt. They might have to default.
#115736 to #115735 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
*yet
#115734 - anon
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115733 - songemot
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115744 to #115733 - seniorawesomesauce ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
>Gary Johnson
>relevant
>Ever
>Bernie Sandman
>Being relevant after the convention
#115737 to #115733 - kanadetenshi
Reply +2
(05/10/2016) [-]
"As Hillary secured the presidency. A mountain climbing libertarian, a Jewish socialist, and a foul mouthed wall building billionaire once opposed are now forced to unite again a common enemy. But they are about to discover that working together is not as easy as it seems"

"Starring: Larry David as Bernie Sanders, Alec Baldwin as Donald Trump, Tommy Lee Jones as Gary Johnson, and Amy Poehler as Hillary Clinton. With supporting rples such as Ben Carson played by Morgan Freeman, Chris Christie played by Jonah Hill, and Ted Cruz played by Brian Baumgartner"

"10/10 daddy was portrayed amazingly" - Milo Yiannopoulos
"2/10 my thinktanks will get you for this propaganda" - George Soros
"10/10 could be better" - IGN
"10/10 This movie exposes the predeconstructive paradigm of reality and Sartreist absurdity" - Slavoj Zizek


"The Hill, now in cinemas near you"
#115828 to #115737 - asotil
Reply 0
(05/12/2016) [-]
I'd watch it
#115749 to #115737 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
rob schneider is a carrot
Hillary Clinton is a devil.

Rated PG 13.
#115730 - anon
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115709 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
What sort of economic model do Radical Islamists espouse?
#115759 to #115709 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
Either a doomed adherence to Islamic law or, more likely, exploitation of the natural wealth of their territory until they have money to invest in the base of a capitalist economy, presumably with regulations against fun things that fundies hate.
#115740 to #115709 - anon
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
Economic Nationalism.
#115732 to #115709 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
Islamic economics is very radical, outdated, and would only work in small gift economies.

The basic principle of islamic economics is that inflation and interests are not good ways to boost spending and that there are alternative methods.

One of these things is Zakat, which is just a fancy word for a 2.5% tax on your total savings based on the amount of your income and value of your possessions which will be given to the poor. They claim that this tax would motivate spending rather than saving, but this is essentially a broken windows fallacy because it assumes that giving 2.5% of your money to someone would be a net benefit, ignoring what the original owner of the money might've used it for. Zakat abuse and conflicting views are also rampant.

Of course abolishing interest rates would stop people from taking loans and halt spending which would definitely stagnate the economy. They see investment banking as an alternative but to even invest in something without interest you would have to save as opposed to spend.

It's still probably better than marxism, but it's up there in terms of not working at all.
#115715 to #115709 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply +2
(05/10/2016) [-]
its getting oil and then selling it
#115712 to #115709 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Why even care.
#115711 to #115709 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Muslims completely ban interest, I know that much, so their capital markets will be very distorted
#115713 to #115711 - theism
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
That's odd. I thought one of the distinguishing features of Islam was that they were fine with interest.
#115716 to #115713 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Your getting heresies confused. Jews would starve without interest.
#115719 to #115716 - theism
Reply +2
(05/10/2016) [-]
I'm 100% sure I'm more informed on this than you bud.
#115718 to #115716 - theism
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#115717 to #115716 - theism
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
I'm 100% sure I'm more informed on this than you bud.
#115720 to #115717 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Usury is a sin in the Catholic Church, and Islam.
#115797 to #115720 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/11/2016) [-]
The Church is not against charging interest. It is against usury in the contemporary sense, meaning interest which is excessive and would keep poorer individuals, groups and states in neverending debt.
#115721 to #115720 - theism
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
I'm fairly certain the Quran doesn't take a stance on that.
#115722 to #115721 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(05/10/2016) [-]
and you say you know more than me. Everyone knows that the prophet mohammed Isn't even mentioned in the Quran. The teachings of Islam come from the Siras, and the Hadith.
#115723 to #115722 - theism
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
Yeah, you're definitely wrong about that.
#115724 to #115723 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
The Siras, and the Hadith are the sayings of the prophet Mohammed, and that's what creates the divisions in Islam, not interpretations of the Quran. It's the Siras and the Hadith that give the orders to kill apostates, and throw faggots off roofs.
#115725 to #115724 - theism
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
You're wrong that Muhammad is not mentioned in the Quran.
#115726 to #115725 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
You got a verse for me?
#115727 to #115726 - theism
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
"Throughout the Quran, Muhammad is referred to as "Messenger", "Messenger of God", and "Prophet". Some of such verses are 2:101, 2:143, 2:151, 3:32, 3:81, 3:144, 3:164, 4:79-80, 5:15, 5:41, 7:157, 8:01, 9:3, 33:40, 48:29, and 66:09."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_in_Islam
#115728 to #115727 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Alright, thanks for clearing that up.
#115729 to #115728 - theism
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
It seems kind of obvious he would be in the Quran.
#115710 to #115709 - whoozy ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
The nonexistent one
#115695 - anon
Reply +2
(05/10/2016) [-]
#115691 - Zaxplab
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
oy pebar
#115698 to #115691 - seniorawesomesauce ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
I dont even understand what statism is. What's the opposite of it?
#115708 to #115698 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
according to anarchists, anyone who is not also an anarchist is a statist
#115701 to #115698 - figatron
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Liberty
#115694 to #115691 - theism
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
I tohught statist was an ancap thing?
#115693 to #115691 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
bingo
#115661 - anon
Reply +4
(05/09/2016) [-]
The joke is going to far.
#115668 to #115661 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I don't get what you're driving at.
#115671 to #115668 - anon
Reply +4
(05/09/2016) [-]
Blaming the Jews for EVERYTHING.
#115672 to #115671 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
You know that Putin used to be a KGB agent right? In a state started mostly by Bolshevik Jews. How do you think Putin got on the right side of the slope at the KGB office?
#115673 to #115672 - anon
Reply +6
(05/09/2016) [-]
#115674 to #115673 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I mean yeah. Nearly 1% of Russia's population in 1918 was Jewish but the Bolshevik party's higher echelons were mostly Jewish, but disregard me, and remember the twelve gorrillion that got turned into lampshades and soap. Get an account already faggot.
#115702 to #115674 - alimais
Reply +1
(05/10/2016) [-]
Ayyy fam, google "Great Purge" and look at who got purged under Stalin
#115676 to #115674 - anon
Reply +2
(05/09/2016) [-]
Let me guess, you are "redpilled".
#115677 to #115676 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
I hate the phase, because it feels a bit cliche, but yeah if that sums up what I believe then yeah.
#115679 to #115677 - anon
Reply +2
(05/09/2016) [-]
So you are retarded, I was just checking.
#115681 to #115679 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I hate that phrase.* My fucking keyboard is dying. I've had it for way too long, and at 98wpm I've worn most of the keys down to shit.
#115675 to #115674 - anon
Reply +4
(05/09/2016) [-]
Neo-Nazi-Jews rule the world!
#115683 to #115656 - anon
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
>theplanetearth
>not a retard
#115657 to #115656 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
theplanetearth

please rephrase this, im having difficulty understanding 40% of you comment, mainly the consumption shit
#115665 to #115657 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Sorry. I typed that argument out multiple different ways, and I got kinda sloppy, and "creative", because I didn't just want to copy and paste.

One of the reasons that race mixing is pushed in the media today is because it creates uncertainty. Now, mixed race children who have sufficient physical traits of either their mother or their father to pass as the race of either their mother or father will not have too much trouble fully conforming to the racial identity of either their mother or their father, and given little thought about the subject will not have many problems. However children who do not have enough physical traits to pass as either race will find themselves unable to fully conform to either one of the cultures of their parents. This creates uncertainty about exactly who they are and it's an uncertainty that will stick with them for a lifetime. These people run the risk of becoming what Common Filth calls alpha consumers.

When you ask an Alpha consumer who they are they will mention their favorite brands, franchises, and what they're a fan of. They have no identity beyond that, and their entire lives revolve around that. A mixed race person is more likely to become an alpha consumer simply because they feel the need to fix the void where a racial identity will go. So they'll pick one of the products that anybody from any race can consume without question, and they'll form an identity that revolves around that. Now what is especially heartbreaking about this is the fact that at any time those of us who are not mixed race can erroneously sojurn into alpha consumerism, but at the end of the day we will always have a racial identity to return to, but in the case of mixed race people they have no such luxury.

Does that seem better or should I take another crack at it?
#115666 to #115665 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
Yes, I see what you're getting at now. Your argument is that mulatto's will embrace materialism and pop culture to form their identities, identities they were denied at birth.
#115667 to #115666 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Exactly.
#115641 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Did anyone hear about the Filipino presidential candidate that used to run death squads in the city he was mayor of? I was talking to some of my J1 Visa coworkers from the Philippines a while back and he mentioned it. First right wing whipping squads, and now actual right wing death squads. I can't wait to see what daring move my Catholic brothers make next.
#115640 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I'm not sure if I'm just becoming more aware of stupidity or if things are just becoming progressively more retarded.
#115663 to #115640 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
both
#115664 to #115663 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I might vote Trump tbh.
#115680 to #115664 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
No shit you will. Retard.
#115682 to #115680 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I just want Cenk to eat shit. I fucking hate that guy.
#115669 to #115638 - anon
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Well Facebook is owned and run by Mark ((Zuckerburg)). This shouldn't surprise anyone with a brain.
#115636 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
I'm not sure which comment section is worse, the one at HuffPost or NYT.

I'm sure theres a fair amount of overlap but there are some differences.

HuffPost is smaller, obviously, and the comments are usually from your "average man" SJW. There is no intellectual pretense, they're cancerous from the ground up.

NYT seems to attract a wide variety of pseudo intellectuals. I just read a seven paragraph comment from a self proclaimed college professor in San Diego that basically amounted to "conservative students are dumb omg." These are the types that like to hear themselves talk.

Either way, I am triggered.
#115625 - pebar
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
reason.com/blog/2016/05/09/bartenders-cant-refuse-to-serve-pregnant

refusing to serve alcohol to a pregnant lady is discrimination, according to NY
#115629 to #115625 - anon
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
And if they do serve the pregnant women alcohol they'll be in a position to be sued for "willingly" endangering the women's pregnancy.

Another lose/lose situation created by the regressives.
#115617 to #115612 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
Gnome Chomsky is right, I think freedom of expression is important. If trannies want to nuke their body that is fine by me, but for God sakes dont force down our throat. I think that is where most people have a problem with it, I refuse to call a person a "women" when I know he is a man, and they are trying criminalize me for it. In New York City, you can be fined up to 250k for "misgendering" a person.

It's starting to seem to me at this point that the LGBT community isn't focused more on rights than it is focused on shoving down their beliefs down your throat and trying to ruin your life for it. Like with the predatory suing-business-x-for-not-serving-me-this and trying to close it down and ruin a person's life, like fags have done before.
#115618 to #115617 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
Basically fuck the LGBT community.
#115642 to #115618 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
Gee it's almost as if you give degenerates an inch Pun A: You'll get a poz load in return, and be given "the gift". Pun B:That's a laugh like I'd ever give a degenerate an inch of anything. Pun C: Because they're so used to always getting inches from people. Pun D: Assuming most of the terminal penis envy cases among them won't be trying to give you an inch of their rubber surrogate penis. they take a mile, and lest we forget the miles they want to take here are some articles that totally don't prove the start of our slide down the slippery slope.
www.salon.com/2015/09/30/im_a_pedophile_youre_the_monsters_my_week_inside_the_vile_right_wing_hate_machine/
gawker.com/horse-genitals-taste-of-hay-and-more-curious-delights-f-1661838152
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3458702/Necrophilia-incest-legal-says-Swedish-Liberal-party-youth-wing-accused-laughable-nitwits-party-senior.html
#115611 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(05/09/2016) [-]
Will London Elect a Muslim  Zuhdi Jasser www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3579301/British-buses-slogans-proclaiming-Allah-country-s-biggest-Muslim-charity-launches-campaign-aid-Syrian-victims.html

>elects muslim as mayor of capital
>has links to islamic extremists (see YT vid, not tinfoil)
>day after he's sworn in London busses drive around with the message "Glory be to Allah"

So politics, at what point do you think progressives will see that islam is incompatible with Western values? When sharia zones are acknowledged? When the prime minister is a muslim? When the first apostate is stoned? Or never at all?

Man I'm glad I don't live in Britain. British Isles could not be invaded for a thousand years. Produced individuals like Newton, Darwin, Stuart Mill, Burke and many others. Literally owned a quarter of the world and was the largest empire in the world.

And then the current britbongs decide to honor their ancestors by inviting cavemen in to slowly tear it up from the inside.
#115670 to #115611 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Don't be an idiot. Progressives only bow to poll numbers, donors, and the media that influences the poll numbers, and you really think the British people did this to themselves? Who sets the migrant quotas?
#115692 to #115670 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Who voted for the politicians?
#115714 to #115692 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/10/2016) [-]
Who tell the people who they can vote for, and besides some of these people aren't even elected. Soros manipulates politics through his money. Soros alone created BLM and femen with his donations, and he killed femen when they were going to expand to Israel.
#115619 to #115611 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Multiculturalism doesn't work. Nothing new here.
#115628 to #115619 - anon
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
America is Multicultural.
#115631 to #115628 - anon
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Look where that's gotten it.
#115630 to #115628 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
First off America is far more assimilated then multicultural, second of all thanks for proving my point. America is another example of multiculturalism not working out well when assimilation isn't pushed hard enough. Just look at the cities.
#115643 to #115630 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
But I thought your tribe wanted us to be a melting pot, and are you saying that America has not yet learned how to be multicultural?
#115647 to #115643 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I think immigration only creates more problems for the people inside it, from social and cultural struggles, to economic. Multiculturalism doesn't work, and putting different ethnic groups together isn't a good idea. Sadly this cannot be changed in America (Europe still has a chance) but drastically limiting immigration is neccesary.

In the European situation, I would completely shut off immigration to non-whites personally.
#115650 to #115647 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
You're fucking joking right? You know you're not white? If you're truly a Jew like the Jews that left Israel after 70AD when the great temple was destroyed then you'd be a semite. That is unless your a Khazar. Assuming your family comes from Poland, and some other place I forgot the name of you're probably a fucking Khazar which makes you Slavic which is closely related to Asians because the Mongols, and Huns murderfucked the hell out of eastern Europe.
#115620 to #115619 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
This is unprecedented however. No recovery by this point.
#115613 to #115611 - anon
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Regressives are so damned stupid that even when they're all on they're knees under threat to convert to Islam or die they will still not acknowledge Islam for what it is.
#115602 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
Really looking forward to the next American Civil War   
Whether I'm fighting or on the sidelines watching the fire with my rifle guarding mah laaaand.
Really looking forward to the next American Civil War
Whether I'm fighting or on the sidelines watching the fire with my rifle guarding mah laaaand.
#115609 to #115602 - redandgreen
Reply +3
(05/09/2016) [-]
GIF
Because your country tearing itself apart and millions dead would be so great....
#115644 to #115609 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
I wish we lived in a fisher price world where everything could be resolved without violent conflict, but unfortunately that's the road we're headed down. In the meantime though...
Blink 1488   Civil War 2
#115621 to #115609 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/09/2016) [-]
It's not great, it's just a cycle all countries will go through. Like I give a shit about any country to begin with.
#115608 to #115602 - pebar
Reply +3
(05/09/2016) [-]