Upload
Login or register
Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Online User List [+] Online: (7): akkere, effort, thumbfortrump, uglychino, unforgivensoul, whoozy, youregaylol, anonymous(4).
asd
#119618 - anon
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
#119598 - pebar
Reply +4
(06/15/2016) [-]
>Democrats "filibuster" demanding action on gun control
>Congress ends up doing nothing
>Government doing nothing is the conservative position on most things
>Every republican's FW
#119625 to #119598 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Has there ever been filibusters that was actually successful? I only know that Wendy Davis only managed to delay a bill that restricted abortion for a little while. It seems like it mostly exist as a means to raise media attention.
#119612 to #119610 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Just so people aren't tempted to click on PopcornVikings cute liberal ignorance, he never actually bought the gun.

The FFL dealer laid out 5 pages of paperwork which the kid didn't fill out, and then the kid left to write a hit piece on gun sales that left wing morons could spam on twitter.

If he would've actually BOUGHT the gun and filled out the paperwork he would've noticed the gun store owner calling the feds, delivering the information, and then they would run the background check that he said he didn't have to do to buy the gun he didn't buy.

18 year olds can buy long guns. No surprise.

I'm not sure if they would've sold it to him with an "expired" drivers license but so what? It's a fucking drivers license. They just a form of ID.

Educate yourself and don't listen to liberal children, they're assholes just looking for clicks, not solutions.
#119614 to #119612 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
I just dont get how any time anyone tries to point out a flaw in gun purchasing system, you discard it as liberal bullshit

radical islam and mental health are both clearly the bigger issues at hand
but there are some flaws that need to be addressed
#119615 to #119614 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
The flaw is there are too many restrictions.
#119616 to #119615 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/16/2016) [-]
explain to me what exactly would be the upside of reducing restrictions

I dont mean that sarcastically
#119617 to #119616 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(06/16/2016) [-]
The citizenry should have free and available access to automatic weapons, silencers, short barreled rifles and shotguns as these would allow us the greatest amount of defense and equip us with a suitable deterrent to any attack on our persons or our rights.

Besides, the restrictions in place make no sense and haven't made the country safer. Needless restrictions are an affront to the people.
#119636 to #119617 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
"Muh ar-15 gon' help me stop da gubmint from guberin my mints"
#119653 to #119636 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Ha, satirically typing like a retard, classic.
#119655 to #119653 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
I really hate having this debate with gun fetishists but if you honestly believe civilian model fire arms are an adequate defense against military tyranny or that your red dawn wet dream is a realistic scenario you are retarded.
#119657 to #119655 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
It's not adequate, which is why i asked for military firearms to be legalized, dumb dumb.

Everyone says revolution is impossible right up until the revolution happens. Every single time, without fail.
#119658 to #119657 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Great. So you want marginally increased combat effectiveness. What about tanks? Would you like some of those? Fighter jets? Nuclear weapons. Surely you're right to those shall not be infringed?

And the broader contention is that your scenario doesn't even enter into the realm of possibility without an insane amount of telegraphing, to the point where revolution wouldn't even enter into it.
#119659 to #119658 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
You're confusing conventional warfare tactics between nations and a civil uprising.

If you have a million armed rebels tearing your supply lines into pieces, recruiting from your populaces, impossible to place, and an army that is reluctant to fight its own people, tanks and jets and even nukes will only prolong the inevitable.

The french did not have cannons or even organized combat troops at the start off the revolution, just a mob with pitchforks and clubs, and eventually they overthrew an kingdom.
#119661 to #119659 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
You also haven't demonstrated why this is a believable scenario.
#119660 to #119659 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
It would be trivial to secure centers of production and population centers. Additionally the PR any dictatorship would be capable of would make recruiting almost impossible. Are we assuming this tyranny hasn't seized control of the media and spun it as the rebels are the terrorists? It would be simple to provide the population with sufficient comforts and incentives such that the rebels would be destroying those to achieve they're goals.
#119663 to #119660 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
No. You're simply wrong. It is impossible to control millions upon millions of people in an urban enviornment, especially one in rebellion. The idea that PR can somehow stop a revolution in its tracks is ridiculous, in every revolution that happened the problems of everyday life outweighed the official stance. People don't just believe despots when their cities are burning and they're starving.

In a scenario where revolution is required, there would be no comforts to provide.

In the event of, say, an EMP shutting down the country, or a natural disaster causing anarchy, or a military coup to seize power during a financial or military crisis, or just widespread general discontent that you can't seem to imagine even though its happened thousands of times before, revolution may be called for.
#119665 to #119663 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
So you're admitting your worldview is informed entirely by science fiction? Because that's what an emp taking out the entire country's power grid is. So is the 100% volunteer army agreeing to enforce tyranny. The infrastructure required for your scenario is obscene. You would need the bulk of the military leadership to agree, then the bulk of their immediate subordinates, the all the way down. There are too many people who could sabotage by refusing for it to work.

And the government suppressing rioting during a disaster wouldn't even come close to tyranny, that would be the simplest you get people behind as the "resistance" would simply be the looters and rioters.

In an actual tyranny scenario our production wouldn't magically stop, and a tyrannical government would definitely be controlling it. In that scenario the government would be the ones providing food, clothing and resources. By attacking them the rebels would be hurting the people.
#119654 to #119653 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
The grammar in that comment matches the intelligence of your argument.
#119656 to #119654 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
The originality of that comment matches the uniqueness of your person.
#119619 to #119617 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
you dont need an automatic weapon to protect your house from being robbed
#119620 to #119619 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
In the event of a riot, it would be beneficial.

Also, "our persons or our rights. "
#119621 to #119620 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
are you trying to kill the rioters or disperse them
because while you might just be trying to disperse them, others might not have the same idea
#119626 to #119621 - whitechino
Reply +1
(06/16/2016) [-]
I'm trying to clapp anyone pulling up to my home and family to take and mess stuff up. The same way when the gov starts to lose control and starts martial law.
Also you really can't get tighter on gun restrictions when you can go to any gun auction in the country and buy anything as long as the seller is claiming it as a collectors item with a loads of authentic ammo.
#119627 to #119626 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
does the 2nd amendment cover ammo or only guns?
#119633 to #119627 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
The 2nd amendment is pretty short. It only states "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." So an extremely narrow, literal interpretation could say this only includes guns, nothing else.

However, no legal scholar would ever use such an interpretation. When interpreting the 2nd Amendment you have to consider the intent behind it. The text itself states that the right is there to secure a free state, meaning the people should be able to defend themselves against their own government. This points to the rather obvious conclusion that the right to bear arms is not just the right to have guns for show, but the right to have guns for protection. Therefore, the Amendment also includes the sale of ammunition for the weapons the Amendment protects.
This sentiment was established in the most reason case on the matter,District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
Here the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment as granting the right of gun ownership to individuals for purposes that include self-defense.
Self-defense through the use of guns is only possible if you have ammo of course.

Conclusion: The Second Amendment also protects ammunition for the weapons it protects.
#119635 to #119633 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Well no, the intention was to provide security against foreign threats and native uprising. Considering the role militias played in the revolutionary war this should be obvious.
#119638 to #119635 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
That was only partially the intention. You do realize that the people who wrote this provision fought against an oppressive regime?

The fact that the 2nd amendment is partially there to protect against an oppressive government is practically accepted by most legal experts, be it judges or professors.
#119639 to #119638 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
They fought against foreign control reasoning that their interests could not be met by a distant government.

The interpretation developed over time.
#119640 to #119639 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
The interpretation did not develop over time, it was a primary concern at the time, as the republic was young a fragile. The starting point of the interpretation of the 2nd amendment has always been its intent.

humanevents.com/2008/07/03/why-do-we-keep-and-bear-arms-part-1/
Please read this.
It's really pointless debating this. It's not only obvious reading through the travaux of the time, but it's also been established by several rulings through the 19th and 20th century.
#119631 to #119627 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(06/16/2016) [-]
Would restricting nouns maintain the spirit of the first amendment?
#119630 to #119627 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
youregaylol
thumbfortrump
lotengo
#119629 to #119627 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Honestly, no one has ever asked me that question before.
I have no idea. I'm going to have to look it up and ask my recruiters tomorrow
#119622 to #119621 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
it depends on the situation.

In any case the second amendment was meant to oppose armies, not thugs.
#119624 to #119622 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
or are you considering the possible influx of refugees as the army of islam
#119623 to #119622 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
so this is for when China invades us for our money
#119613 to #119612 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
i believe you
#119604 to #119598 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
In that time 50000 Jewish muslim aclu professors got gay married at a marijuana dispensary abortion clinic in a new York city.

Republican fw.
#119606 to #119604 - anon
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
Thats almost like humor
#119607 to #119606 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Yeah I'm pretty fuckin funny.
#119603 to #119598 - canyou
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
That reminds me of a post my sanders supporting friend posted that pissed me off. He said something like "Republicans promise to improve the economy, but they haven't signed in a single bill to create new jobs in the last 4 years. Wake up."
#119593 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Signs a man is a beta cuck:

>he considers himself an expert on politics and will often smugly cite random facts pertaining to this field
#119632 to #119593 - anon
Reply +2
(06/16/2016) [-]
So yourgaylol.
#119599 to #119593 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
#119592 - youregaylol
Reply +4
(06/15/2016) [-]
Going to my first Trump rally in Houston on Friday. Feeling pumped.

No non approved signs are allowed but I think i can write on the back of a sign they give me, if anyone wants me to write anything just ask.
#119641 to #119592 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
Johnny Rebel  Stand up and be counted Play this song too
#119602 to #119592 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
FAT BEN MADE POOP
#119596 to #119592 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Where can I find a schedule or list of places he is supposed to visit? I had no idea he was coming to Houston.
#119597 to #119596 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
www.donaldjtrump.com/schedule/

Order your tickets now, in past rallies they've ran out and they sold for like 200 bucks on ebay.

It will be at the Woodlands convention center, I've never been so I don't know how many people it can hold.
#119594 to #119592 - whitechino
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
Trump
Truly
Representing
Us
Minority
Persons
#119601 to #119594 - pebar
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
TT
#119595 to #119594 - youregaylol
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
That was terrible.
#119600 to #119595 - whitechino
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Trump
Thrusting
relatives
under
marshmallow
pillows
#119608 to #119600 - anon
Reply +1
(06/16/2016) [-]
Trump
Tinkled
rebelliously
upon
Muslims'
"peace"
#119609 to #119608 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/16/2016) [-]
We got a winner
#119588 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
/pol/ worships this guy
#119590 to #119588 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
He's live

>death threats from muslims
>Saudi twitter owner fucks with Milo's twitter
>Milo gives no fucks and is giving a speech titled "Absolutely Haram"
www.periscope.tv/w/1lPJqzaopAExb
#119583 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Golly gee well what is this?
#119584 to #119583 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Say Isn't that the terrorist from Orlando's dad standing in front of Hillary Clinton's office door?
#119585 to #119584 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
What's the backstory here? Because I'm 99% sure this guy wanted to run for president of Afghanistan on a pro-Taliban platform.
#119586 to #119585 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Probably something related to this.
#119582 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I'll like to take back my statement about the gov having to do with the shooting in Orlando.
-Some fag said he was keeping the door closed cause he was too scared to die.
Fox news actually bringing out the truth for once.
#119557 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Hi Im a Slut  A Slam Poem
comment section killed me
#119591 to #119557 - aceofshadows
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
"Dear Lord, I found your channel and I was unable to move for a while. You are a reality. Thank you for existing"

Is calling someone a reality a compliment or something?
#119589 to #119557 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
why is it always these sort of hipster faggots doing slam poetry
#119563 to #119557 - youregaylol
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
"I love this. Slut is a word that shouldn't be an insult, because it is simply a description. I love your videos, and you are awesome."

What does this even mean. Insults can't be insults if they have a description? What?
#119560 to #119557 - thumbfortrump
Reply +3
(06/15/2016) [-]
She has good blowjob eyes.
#119555 - newbtwo
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
so if i heard correctly something or other happened yesterday for murican elections

is it important? hows trump doing?
#119587 to #119555 - canyou
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I can't think of anything special that happened. Trump was actually bearing Hillary in several polls, and one of Hillary Clinton's aids was given criminal immunity, which means if he testifies against her in the email scandal, he won't get into any legal trouble for his involvement. Besides the nightclub shooting shaking things up and Bernie basically losing the nomination to Hillary that's all I can think of.
#119554 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
#119561 to #119554 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
I think that women are generally a hindrance in battle. That's not to say women shouldn't have the right to be in the military if they choose, or that women can't be good fighters, because history is full of impressive warrior women, but the average woman isn't going to outfight or outperform the average man.
#119539 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Corrupt establishment career politician just got beat in my state's governor primary race
The other guy only had a 10% chance of winning last I looked, but he pulled it off

this makes me happy

I haven't even look at what the winner stands for; I'm just glad the other guy lost
#119545 to #119539 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
what state
#119546 to #119545 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
best dakota
#119547 to #119546 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Good ol South Dakota.
#119549 to #119547 - pebar
Reply +5
(06/15/2016) [-]
#119521 - asotil
Reply +2
(06/15/2016) [-]
>Child at Disney dragged off into water by alligator
>Police divers currently searching for child

Godspeed Lunchmeats, Ban Assault Gators

Seriously what the Fuck is up with Orlando lately
#119512 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Gary Johnson is Not A Libertarian And Were Under Attack By Zealots So I Will Support Donald Trump
He finally broken, folks. He's one us.
#119507 - canyou
Reply +4
(06/15/2016) [-]
Twitter blocked #GaysForTrump

Why?
#119513 to #119507 - pebar
Reply +3
(06/15/2016) [-]
because gays aren't allowed to have their own unapproved opinions
it's the same with blacks or any other group

you should see how leftists react to black republicans
it's hysterical
#119514 to #119513 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
When you join the left, you give them your soul. You must act a certain way, and you must have certain opinions. If you're gay you must hate christian bakers while giving a pass to murdering muslims. If you're black you must hate white republicans while not caring about inner city black shootings.

Only a rare few can break free, but they are never truly the same. feelythefeel was once a bigger faggotini than theism. He broke free, but I believe the emotional trauma of knowing you were a liberal douche will be with him forever. Pray for their souls.
#119534 to #119514 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
You mentioned me, you started it.

It's impossible you're not aware of this phenomenon. Feigned homophobia is the bread and butter of closet gays. You're the perfect example.
#119535 to #119534 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I used you as an example about the consequences of being a liberal douche. That doesn't mean that I want to speak to you. I just want to hold you up as a cautionary tale.

This sexual obsession you have with me is disturbing. I would call the cops if I didn't know that you're a low testosterone manlet.
#119559 to #119535 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Still doing the "everyone's after me" shtick I see
#119562 to #119559 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
lol, remember how you would whine about stalking everytime i would bring up the fact that you stabbed your mother
#119564 to #119562 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Nice damage control
#119568 to #119564 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Reading through this again I'm actually surprised the cops didn't shoot you.
#119581 to #119568 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Tldr
#119566 to #119564 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
>it's damage control when you point out my hypocrisy

Heres the first part if anyone wants the complete look into a psychopaths mind.
#119569 to #119566 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
If you were right about that everyone and their grandfather were stalking you, plenty of people would already have looked into a psychpaths mind, namely yours.

But you're so unremarkable, generic and uninteresting that you have to tell yourself that a bunch of people are obsessed with you because of your master trole comments. In reality, however, you're an average joe Bob at best and you didn't receive enough attention growing up.
#119570 to #119569 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I don't think I'm being stalked by anyone Norman Bates, you babies just desire my attention, which I generously give you from time to time.

Granted I have never cut open my parents leg, so you may have beaten me in the interesting department.

So why did the cops not shoot you? Did you already calm down when they came by?
#119573 to #119570 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Tldr
#119575 to #119573 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Ah, really?

The only fun I have with you is when we talk about your psychosis. You're boring otherwise.

Come on, I wont make fun. Did they break down the bathroom door guns drawn, or did you willingly drop the knife and come out?
#119578 to #119575 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Tldr
#119579 to #119578 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
*tl;dr
#119580 to #119579 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Tldr
#119536 to #119535 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I love how you bring the conversation to homosexuality and bizarre fetishes and then try to run away from the subject. If you were capable of subtlety it'd almost seem like a brilliant joke.
#119537 to #119536 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
>first comment is about dick sucking
>third comment is about nuts
>"you brought the conversation to homosexuality"

Delusion is a staple of homos, why am I surprised.
#119538 to #119537 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
It's almost like there's a difference between jokes and actually calling someone gay. Not that you'd know that.
#119540 to #119538 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
>damage control

Don't backpedal too hard kevin, you might fall back onto jamals dick.
#119541 to #119540 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
And we're back to this. If you don't want to confront your gay feelings that's fine but don't drag everyone else into it.
#119543 to #119541 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
It's simple. You took the opportunity to try to come on to me by making homosexual remarks. You then accused me of being a fag like you. I then replied that you're actually a homosexual.

I can see how a mentally unstable homo might not understand whats happening though.

I hope that your parents send you to a camp.
#119548 to #119543 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I think you still don't get the difference between jokes and reality. You got specific, talked about black dicks, humiliation fetishes and actually calling people gay. I used a pretty standard set of gay jokes, ones you've used variants of. You're the one who actually made it a discussion about homosexuality. In fact you always tend towards homoeroticism, with your kissing emojis and talking about kissing. So why are you trying to hide from it?
#119550 to #119548 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Nah, I'm pretty sure the person talking about dick sucking and nuts made it a discussion about homosexuality.

If you're a known faggot, and you call other people gay out of the blue, expect other people to call you out on being gay.

The black dicks and humiliation fetishes were jokes as well, though you seem very triggered by it. Perhaps theres some truth in that, idk.

Either way, stop trying to have sex with me pls. I don't like enjoy men or manlets.
#119551 to #119550 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I guess you can't understand jokes when they're explained directly to you. Not a lot I can do to help buddy. Good luck getting out of that closet.
#119552 to #119551 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Tremendous Faggot: Haha suck my dick homo.
Normal guy: What
Tremendous Faggot: Go eat some nuts, gayboy lol
Normal guy: Aren't you gay though?
Tremendous Faggot: Wow nice job making this about homosexuality you really are gay I can't believe you just brought that up out of nowhere get out of the closet already

Go to the Gay Away camp kevin, you need it.
#119553 to #119552 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
"Get off my nuts" and "stop sacking my dick" are common insults. So is "you like nuts". Obviously you don't understand this but that's ok, we all learn at our own pace. I'm not literally calling you gay, I'm likening your obsession with me to sexual attraction to make you uncomfortable so you go bother someone else. You made it an actual conversation about homosexuality, rather than a joke one. You brought up specific sexual interests seemingly randomly. You've also said manlet and brought up pray the gay away camps several times so I have an even broader picture of your insecurities.
#119515 to #119514 - theism ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
Dude I'm not going to let you suck my dick so get over it.
#119516 to #119515 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Reverse psychology doesn't work on me, Fredo.
#119517 to #119516 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Does regular psychology work? I'll give you a cookie every 3-5 times you don't talk to or about me.
#119542 to #119517 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
If I may interject, reinforcement like that is really ineffective when they're not doing anything

it's when they do something, that's when you want to take action
#119544 to #119542 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
What I was going for was him actively not engaging but in that case positive punishment and negative reinforcement are closer to what I'm really going for.
#119518 to #119517 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Cookies may have persuaded you to stop screaming at your mother during bedtime, fatty, but they wont sway me.
#119519 to #119518 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Sorry I forgot you prefer nuts.
#119520 to #119519 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Didn't someone say that you literally posted a nude on the gay board? lulz or syrian?

I think they did. You're a literal faggot.
#119522 to #119520 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
You've got your words confused. A faggot is someone who says faggy shit, eg you.
#119523 to #119522 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Also someone who sucks off negroes, eg you.
#119524 to #119523 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I actually don't like black guys.
#119525 to #119524 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Maybe thats part of your humiliation fetish then, idk im not your psychiatrist.
#119526 to #119525 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
That's very specific. Are you trying to tell us something?
#119527 to #119526 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
lol how is that specific.

you're a dummy and a homo

why is it that so many leftists like penis in their ass
#119528 to #119527 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Sticking black dick to humiliate yourself? Do you like to get beaten too because you might have some brain damage pal.

You'll find that plenty of conservatives are fans of the cock and, like yourself, indulge when the wife is out.
#119529 to #119528 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
No, taking african dong even though you profess to hate it, therefor humiliating yourself.

Can we not talk about your sick fetishes anymore, thx.

Anyone who has a penis enter him is no longer a man.
#119530 to #119529 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
You're the one who brought it up. True to form you seem ashamed of it.

Huh, so I guess half the GOP are women?
#119531 to #119530 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I am ashamed to be speaking to such a depraved buttlord, I admit.

What are you even saying? You think half of the GOP are gay? Or you're legitimately saying half of the GOP is comprised of women?

It's simple, if you have a penis, and another penis enters your butt, mouth, or any other part of your body, you are no longer a man. You are a sort of mutant tranny sissy faggot.
#119565 to #119531 - buttlord
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
What did i do to deserve being used as an insult?
#119567 to #119565 - youregaylol
0
(06/15/2016) [-]
buttking would've taken it too far
#119532 to #119531 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Then why do you keep starting conversations?

Google "Republican gay scandal". It's good for a laugh.
#119533 to #119532 - youregaylol
0
(06/15/2016) [-]
I didn't stupid, you did.

I'd rather not look up your sick pornography.
#119509 to #119507 - aceofshadows
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Because they're morons.
#119510 to #119509 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
GaysForTrump or twitter?
#119511 to #119510 - aceofshadows
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Twitter
#119508 to #119507 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Because Twitter doesn't want anything that goes against the lefty narrative. Gays supporting a republican is a major violation of that.
#119503 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
"Distribute my wealth now, nerd."
#119571 to #119503 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
pussy still didn't want to debate him.
#119572 to #119571 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
If he debated Bernie he'd have to debate Jeb Bush and Vermin Supreme just to be fair to all the other losers.
#119574 to #119572 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
suuuuure
#119576 to #119574 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
If you put another "u" in there you'd actually have a witty comeback.
#119577 to #119576 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
didn't want to waste what I got
#119501 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/14/2016) [-]
the feds are going after the wife claim she's an accessory since she knew what he was planning

I was under the impression that spouses are under no obligation to talk to the government because the government sees a married couple as a single entity and thus you would be forced to testify against "yourself" which violates the 5th amendment
#119556 to #119501 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
Its like Trump says, you gotta take out the family
#119502 to #119501 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(06/14/2016) [-]
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/marital_privilege

One spouse can refuse to testify against another and private communication is protected.

Whose wife are you talking about?
#119496 - shekelnator
Reply +2
(06/14/2016) [-]
#119505 to #119496 - anon
Reply 0
(06/15/2016) [-]
The Muzzies because they are less "privileged" than gays. In fact, some parts of the rad-left have actually turned against homosexuals (or strictly gay men at the very least) saying they're not "oppressed" enough to deserve representation.
#119498 to #119496 - klowserpok
Reply +2
(06/14/2016) [-]
Judging by recent events, probably the muslim
#119504 to #119498 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(06/15/2016) [-]
if theres one good thing to come out of this, we know that muslims are higher than gays in the liberal victim totem, now we just need to see if they're higher than blacks.
#119490 - mvtjets ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/14/2016) [-]
twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/740973710593654784

Born too late to explore the earth
Born too early to explore the cosmos
Born just in time to watch politicians debate via shitposting
#119492 to #119490 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/14/2016) [-]
Deleting things seems to be her solution to everything.
#119489 - anon
Reply 0
(06/14/2016) [-]
ORLANDO STRONK

REMOVE KEBAB FROM PREMISES
#119488 - pebar
Reply +1
(06/14/2016) [-]
New info says orlando shooter did not use an AR-15
Media just said he did because the rifle was black and scary

bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/06/13/narrative-fail-orlando-islamic-terrorist-use-ar-15/

he used a sig sauer mcx