Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (3): akkere, marinepenguin, pebar, anonymous(7).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#117055 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trudeau has actually earned a little bit of my respect after that elbow incident. Nice to know the man has a shred of masculinity to him.
#117074 to #117055 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
What even happened? No matter how many times I watched the video, I couldn't see anything happening.
#117075 to #117074 - unforgivensoul
Reply +3
(05/24/2016) [-]
He bumped slightly into a women with his elbow, and the world feigned outrage.
#117057 to #117055 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Isn't he a boxer?
#117045 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I select my classes for the fall term tomorrow
The math class I wanted to take is full so I need a plan B class

I can either take the next level up of Spanish (Im considering minoring in Spanish but still not sure)
Or a history class
The history classes that sound interesting are "Nazi Science, Medicine, & Technology" and "The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union"

Which one of the 3 should I take?
#117064 to #117045 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Spanish
#117067 to #117064 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
yea thats what i think im gonna do
the nazi science class while interesting, doesnt fill any requirement i havent already met
and if i save the spanish minor requirements for senior year its gonna be a clusterfuck of classes i still need to take

ill save some of the interesting classes for senior year
#117068 to #117067 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, bro. Learn to communicate with countries than learning about Nazis and history. Save those other good stuff near the end.
#117054 to #117045 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The Nazi one sounds awesome.
#117046 to #117045 - akkere
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
What are you planning on majoring in/ entering a field in, and would this class be considered a [social] elective (which leads to the question of whether or not you're already taking an elective of the same degree)?
#117049 to #117046 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
the other 2 classes im gonna take are political science
this is for my 3rd class
#117047 to #117046 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Im a political science major
But my dad is pretty gonna make me go to law school and get a professional degree regardless
#117050 to #117047 - akkere
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Building a minor in Spanish might compliment a Law professional degree nicely, though is there any other option for a professional degree you want to consider (something on the technical side, for instance) that you might cast the extra class towards? A sort of "sampling the waters" kind of class, if you will.
Personally I'd be interested in "Nazi Science, Medicine, & Technology", as it would likely further expound the world of advancement uncovered out of ethics equating to atrocity.
#117053 to #117050 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
theres only 12/25 spots left in the nazi class
hopefully when its my time slot theres still a spot
if not ill just take spanish
#117051 to #117050 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
i suck at math
i never even took precalc or physics in high school
i finished with an 87 average and got into a school where the average accepted student has a 93 average cause I played to my strengths really well

The math class I wanted to take is on the math involved in elections but all the applied math courses like that one say theres specifically no calc or advanced statistics involved

The Nazi Science course is history and not science but I get what youre saying
Technology just isnt my thing
#117026 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Kaoma  Lambada Official Video 1989 HD bet this triggers all the right wingers
#117066 to #117026 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
Why would it?
#117043 to #117026 - Zaxplab
Reply +4
(05/24/2016) [-]
#117036 to #117026 - canyou
Reply +4
(05/24/2016) [-]
Right wingers don't get triggered, they just angrier and angrier until a school shooting happens
#117037 to #117036 - anon
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
So when they get triggered people die.
Sounds about right.
#117059 to #117037 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
It's the guns that get triggered.
#117073 to #117059 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Thats the joke retard.
#117093 to #117073 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
You said it bad.
#117098 to #117093 - anon
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
No he didn't you autist
#117099 to #117098 - theism
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
He did a different joke good, or that joke bad. Pick one.
#117021 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
who will win
#117061 to #117021 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
ISIS
#117033 to #117021 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trump, what a dumb question.
#117060 to #117033 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
really?
#117062 to #117060 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yep.
#117063 to #117062 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
dont all the polls say hillary will win
#117070 to #117063 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
...no
#117071 to #117070 - newbtwo
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
wont she win anyway because jews?
#117096 to #117071 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
yes
#117024 to #117021 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
8===>
This chode
#117023 to #117021 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +3
(05/24/2016) [-]
The Jews
#117018 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Eventually the EU will be disbanded, however I would prefer a much more just conclusion. The day of the rope should come to every single EU bureaucrat. There should be violent revolutions in the streets of Europe. That is how I want this to end, I want the people to learn, I want their children to remember this and speak of it throughout the history books of Europe.

It would be an unjust conclusion to mankind for this not to end in violence, sometimes violence is deserved. The french revolution got it right, lets modernize it. The Europeans need their own 1776.
#117038 to #117018 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Easier still to simply purge the civil service wing and the legistature, and I must say you've got your head in some weird clouds right now.

Best way to think of this in a historical context starting from the french revolution
French revolution fucks up the balance of power in Europe, leading to whole napoleon deal, and then to the congress of vienna which essentially established a balance of power to prevent a major european war and various other congresses were called to deal with problems like expanding Russian power, and the state of the ottoman empire etc etc until Bismarck being removed from power in Germany and WWI formally crushing it.

After WWI there was a failure to set up anything like the congress of vienna to create a lasting peace, that being the major factor in the start of WW2.

After that you had the european steel and coal community which was basically tying the economy of germany to the western allies, This would later become the EU and is the status quo we have today, keeping peace in europe by making it economic suicide to do anything radical outside of being a liberal democracy of some description.
#117039 to #117038 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
....where's the pro-EU argument again? Or are you saying your argument is "either it rules them all or we have massive chaos and ww3" which is totally retarded and a false dichotomy.
#117048 to #117039 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I'm not arguing for the EU nor am I arguing for the EU to exercise complete control over constituent nations...
I'm explaining to you, since you don't seem to have a very good grasp of European history, how and why the EU came to exist, and it's main function previously was, prevention of a single hegemonic state in europe arising and establishing lasting peace. Which it has done.

To say the EU needs to burn in revolutionary fire is simply put, delusional, when you think that there are a lot of binding treaties that these countries signed into with very few having opt outs for certain clauses, often consulting via referendums without the past 10-20 years depending on the treaty well it'd reflect very poorly in geopolitical context for these countries to try pull out of the EU. Putting it simply I very much doubt the EU is going anywhere anytime soon.
#117052 to #117048 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Thank you for teaching me common sense history that I already know, your argument is stupid. I've already explained why above.

Just because there will be short-term confusion and a lack of economic progress doesn't mean it outweighs the long-term social benefit of getting rid of the EU. And before you bring up the "leave and it will cause untold chaos", if that is your faith in the humanity of Europe, then its destined to fail to begin with. However we've come to far in terms of globalism and progressivism to have some European war, even without the EU the countries have very close economic ties that will continue. Your argument is just plain stupid, I'm sorry but its literally fear mongering.
#117056 to #117052 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
"Faith in the humanity of Europe" Ha, no, I see people break their legs on falling off a roof not wearing correct equipment. People are not clever and for the most part don't know their interests, without an institution like the EU to offset the national governments self interest, but making it in their interest to not kill themselves essentially. Well peace has a hilarious side effect of making people think stupidly, like thinking the EU has any interests in social policy aside from that weird liberal democratic back drop of basic human rights and liberties.

It's not scaremongering. It's simply how things are. You sign a contract for a loan with your bank, you then break that contract other banks are not likely to lend to you on favourable terms. Same applies when you sign a treaty with and country or entity and break it. It sinks your reputation, like with the UK leaving the EU essentially stabs their soft power in the knee, it's a stupid move from a geopolitical pov hence why the incumbent government in the UK is backing it despite internal oppasition from his own party. Because it's geopolitical suicide they shoot their soft power in the leg essentially. Address the points don't just dismiss them as "fearmongering".
#117072 to #117056 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I've literally addressed your points, you have restated them. Please reread what I said before. Long term benefit outweighs short term.

All of your pro-NWO, pro-authoritarian propaganda makes sense when i remember that you are a communist sympathizer after all.
#117076 to #117072 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
You only said, that short term confusion and lack of economic progress, doesn't outweight the long term social benefit of getting rid of the EU, without stating any hows or why's. You're speculating aimlessly, whilst I've gone and looked at what has happened previously which you havn't actually addressed at all, you've just said "Nah that won't happen, it'll be k"
#117079 to #117076 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
>without stating any hows or why's
What hows or whys do you need? The long term social benefit is democracy, being able to make your own decisions, not being pressured into doing something you don't want just because of the EU like taking massive amounts of refugees, the crisis which the EU singlehandedly engineered. Yes I would gladly go through a recession to end such tyranny, just like I'd go through a revolution to end communism.

>You're speculating aimlessly
You're literally doing the same thing, you seem to be predicting another world war or economic collapse. Your doing massive fear-mongering, the same thing the campaigners use. Instead of defending the idea, you scare people. Free trade and open-ish borders can exist without such a super-state cesspool of garbage, aka 4th reich 2.0.

>"Nah that won't happen, it'll be k
Yeah your prediction is far more believable.
#117114 to #117079 - valeriya
Reply 0
(05/25/2016) [-]
Finally points I can address, I don't think democracy brings much of a social benefit aside from a belief of control and accountability freedom in Europe has never really been an absolute as it has in the US. To be honest with regards to the issue on refugees, 60%+ of eu nations were involved in Iraq and helped destablize the region, most of them have stood idle whilst Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Russia, UK etc etc power play over Syria and let it burn, so they do have a degree of responsibility for the current migrant problem. Another thing to bare in mind the EU in it's current form was agreed upon by the member states, they govern by consent for the most part, and when necessary executive, since often well when shit hits the fan you don't have time to ask permission, you can only ask for forgiveness later.

My prediction is based upon what happened the last time there was no institution or system to secure a lack of hegemony in Europe Call it fearmongering if it makes you happy, but it's the reality of the situation , or when Europe relied on another system I very much doubt we've made so much progress that a war in Europe is impossible, that is what they thought when the balklans exploded on themselves, since it shocked everyone at how essentially powerless the UN and world was to do anything , since you could argue they relied on the whole league of nations idea, which quickly went down the drain and proved helpless to stop anything.
#117029 to #117018 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
You probably need a lie down or something.
#117030 to #117029 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Sometimes violent revolutions are necessary, European people shouldn't be forced to take this shit lying down. They should be rioting in the streets like the Ukrainians did in Maidan Square.
#117035 to #117030 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>Sometimes violent revolutions are necessary
Why?
#117040 to #117035 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Because it is unjust not to end the regime and it is unjust not to punish them. What a stupid question.
#117044 to #117040 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Jews are a little slow.
You never think about what comes after.
#117022 to #117018 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
That seems pretty counter productive. You're exaggerating the problems EU is causing, albeit they're serious.
#117031 to #117022 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Exaggerating the problems? Dood the EU IS LITERALLY FORCING COUNTRIES to take in refugees they don't want. Now they're trying to meddle and influence the politics of countries to their own benefit. That's just half of the harm they've done to Europe. This is incredibly serious shit and worthy of riots and violence.
#117020 to #117018 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
The more I've learned about the EU, the more I've realized its just the opposite reaction to the authoritarianism of the second World War.
#117028 to #117020 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
That's definitely how it started out. It was supposed to prevent another big European war by tying economies together through trade.
#117019 to #117018 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I don't really think the people of Slovenia need that right now after having independence for like 15 years
#117025 to #117013 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
And they are still wondering why people are having referendums to exit

Fucking retards
#117016 to #117013 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
"Guys the EU is a great organization, it's not some totalitarian super-state entity that will unfairly and undemocratically meddle in the affairs of countries, right?"

Fuck you redandgreeen and all other EU supporters, fascist pigs.
#117027 to #117016 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
Because I've said so many times that the EU is perfect and in no need of any reform.....
Fuck you.
#117032 to #117027 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
You can't reform the fundamental idea. EU is inherently totalitarian, it is inherently anti-democratic. How exactly do you reform that? Please enlighten me, please.

I have no problem with you siding with the EU because it personally benefits you, but if you're going to defend it you better have a good excuse. I don't see any aside from "it benefits me personally". Every thing else is fear mongering and "I don't want change".
#117058 to #117032 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(05/24/2016) [-]
The Commission is arguably anti-democratic because its members are appointed by the governments of the member states.
There is a parliament which is directly elected.
I think it should either go to more full political union if referenda in the member states support it or go back to being an economic but not a political union. The problem with it is it's kind of half way.
The EU benefits most of its members through free trade and movement of people.
#117041 to #117032 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
fear mongering is how trump has gotten this far
#117014 to #117013 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
"However, the backlash has already begun against the new, explicitly anti-democratic EU powers. Hungary’s Victor Orbàn has vowed to help Poland fight the Commission, and other Eastern, Visegrad nations are likely to join the growing coalition."

How can 1 man, nay, how can two countries be so based.
#117015 to #117014 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
This could potentially lead to some serious changes in the near future. If the EU continues on the path it is on, we may end up seeing its dissolvement.
#116999 - economicfreedom
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>If you don't agree with me, you're an anarchist
#117007 to #116999 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Are you an anarchist?
#117003 to #116999 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>implying there's anything wrong with that
#117017 to #117003 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
That's just bullshit, Trump obviously will play the game to get elected, say things he may not mean. But there are obviously his true beliefs that he espouses too.
#116998 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
If there's anything that would make me vote Trump, it's leftists talking favorably about socialism
#117009 to #116998 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Socialism without niggers is the only socialism that works.
#117008 to #116998 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Socialism will live on forever. Hope you know that buddy.
#117010 to #117008 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Like a rotting, undead entity that keeps coming back no matter how much you defeat it.
#117154 to #117010 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(05/26/2016) [-]
ello ello you called?
#117034 to #117010 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Fascism?
#117004 to #116998 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Cenk uger's smug ass face is what did it for me.
#117002 to #116998 - Shiny
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trump would espouse Stalinism if it would make him popular.
#116995 - anon
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
>Donald Trump believes that Bill Clinton is a rapist
>Invites him to his wedding anyways.
#116977 - anon
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Yourgaylol = Cuck of the board
#116986 to #116977 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I think I disagree with him on everything but these comments don't help anything or lead to any kind of discussion.
#116989 to #116986 - anon
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I hope it makes that gay oversensitive subhuman sailor kill himself.
#116990 to #116989 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
That just makes you an arse though. I'm not going to respond again because you're probably just going to do whatever anyway but it isn't nice or healthy and it doesn't really belong here.
#116984 to #116977 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]

#116967 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
One of my favorite YouTube channels Charisma on Command just made a video called "Why Trump will SMASH Hillary". He focuses on how people respond to other people's charisma, body language, etc. I'm dying to watch it but I'm at my job orientation.
#116991 to #116967 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
People don't, I hope, vote based solely on charisma though. It obviously helps if you can sell your ideas and charisma is part of that but policies are important.

Trump's policies on immigration will probably be a hard sell to most Democrats just as his views on trade will be to many Republicans, whether he's charismatic or not.
#116993 to #116991 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The content creator suggested that Hillary would be a much stronger opponent if instead of trying to prove she's a even more of a political outsider than Trump (Ha!), she'd just say that him being an outsider is dangerous and not a good quality for presidency. He then went on to bet $1,000 on Trump to win the nomination even though he won't vote for him.

It's Trump's game, Hillary's just dumb enough to play it.
#116994 to #116993 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The whole "political oursider" argument is just stupid anyways.
#117005 to #116994 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah. People just assume all politicians are crooked.
#117006 to #117005 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Because it's easier to group everybody together
#116970 to #116967 - akkere
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
Most people have read the headline that goes something like "Statistical model predicts 97% chance of Trump winning" or something along those lines, but one thing people overlook was the actual set of factors the model runs on. The professor who made the model figured that success in a presidential campaign correlates directly to success in primaries (and, if I remember correctly, general debates). Though I'm rather curious how one would be able to quantify a success for cases where both candidates are considerably matched in charisma or lack thereof (2012 for example saw debates that didn't really go anywhere as far as I can recall), you wouldn't need to look into deep psychological aspects to see Trump would likely conquer under these circumstances.
#116968 to #116967 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
I was literally watching it in the background while I read this. Great minds think a like
#116964 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
www.rt.com/news/344020-far-right-austria-president/

Could this mark the beginning of the rising ring wing in Europe?
#116996 to #116964 - Shiny
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Seeing as fascism is the least efficient form of government ever devised, I kind of hope there is no compromise so it burns out in a decade.
#117001 to #116996 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I don't think it'll be a form of Fascism if the right starts gaining power.
#116975 to #116964 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
He didn't win though.
#117000 to #116975 - alimais ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
But there may be new election because a mayor rigged the election in his town and a town with +9000 people had +13 000 voters
#116974 to #116964 - anon
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
If he spews Nazi party lines.
No. That is a big turn off for everyone.
#116965 to #116964 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Lmao no. Some votes will happen to be inlegit so a new election will be held and surprise surprise the left win again
#116963 - anon
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Alerta Alerta Antifascista Van Der Bellen is now President of Austria.
#116972 to #116963 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
*Hofer
#116978 to #116972 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Hofer lost though.
#116992 to #116978 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
rigged
#116955 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I really wish the US had been nicer to South America throughout history. That would be cool if we could get all them as states.
#117011 to #116955 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Didn't we make a claim saying "If you fuck with south American countries, you have to fuck with us" even though we were a minor power across the ocean from the REAL superpowers? That seems pretty nice to me.

Also TFW no Knights of the Golden Circle, no successful "republic of lower california", no successful annexation of nicaragua
#117042 to #117011 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, but the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary also allowed us to just fuck with them for not upholding our interests. I wish it was more "Keep Europe out," and less "Keep America in."

I just think that America could make all the South American exporting countries even better if they were states.
#116971 to #116955 - theplanetearth
Reply -3
(05/23/2016) [-]
Too many shitskins.
#116997 to #116971 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>go to brown people land
>why are there so many brown people
>fucking cultural marxism
#116959 to #116955 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
>when people say US involvement with foreign regimes is a conspiracy theory
#116957 to #116955 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
then we'd share a same currency and thus directly share a lot of economic problems

keep all their problems south of the border, thanks
#116958 to #116957 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Thay could only benefit. It's not like them have anything on us.
#116969 to #116958 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Wtf are you talking about. Did the Eurozone and the EU not teach you anything?
#116951 - anon
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
#116960 to #116951 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I'm sure they'd be happy to let it sink in.
#116954 to #116951 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Once the problems occur, they'll switch it back to two bathrooms.
#116941 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/headlines/36354520

I don't know how they'd do it but I hope if the UK does decide to leave the EU that they don't put the border controls in.
#116948 to #116941 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Why not?
#116979 to #116948 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Because in Ireland it'll be a nightmare. There are roads which cross the border several times along their length.
If they do it then I hope they have an exception for Ireland and keep the open border.
#116946 to #116941 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
There are good reasons to leave the EU, but if their choice is "or else the niggies will rape us" they probably have no real plan laid out.
#116980 to #116946 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Both campaigns have been focused on fear which they haven't really explained or statistics and claims which have been refuted to some extent by the press. Nobody I know think much of the campaigns and politicians involved regardless of their opinion on staying or going!
#116940 - mixednuts
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Insiders explains the concept of a dank meme So, has anyone else been keeping up with the Australian federal election?
#116973 to #116940 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
Jesus christ...I want more.
#116933 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
oh shit
#116962 to #116933 - anon
Reply +2
(05/23/2016) [-]
Trump & Clinton.
#116949 to #116933 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara
#116942 to #116933 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
It begins.
#116943 to #116942 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
It's still months away. Any poll is meaningless this far out.
#116945 to #116943 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
This sudden rise in the polls makes sense though, during the primaries he didn't focus on Hillary but after Cruz and Kasich dropped he went on the offensive and we've seen only his polls rising since then.
#116981 to #116945 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
It may do but it's still meaningless this far out.
#116952 to #116945 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
You're forgetting Bernie bros haven't committed to Hillary yet.
#116953 to #116952 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I don't think many will.
#116982 to #116953 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I think in the end they'll settle for Clinton as the lesser of two evils in terms of their beliefs.
#116983 to #116982 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
From my personal experiences, Bernie supporters at least consider Trump a political outsider and while they despise him, he's better than Clinton. At least that's what I've gauged from the couple dozen supporters I know personally. They seem to either concede to trump, or they'll write Bernie in as third party.
#116985 to #116983 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I'm surprised by that, Clinton is closer to Bernie on most issues.
#116987 to #116985 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
It seems that they think she's only taking those positions because Bernie has gained such massive and loyal attention from his views. They think she's a fraud and very little could change that opinion of her.

I've even seen things like "right wing Hillary" on Facebook, which is pretty ridiculous. But shows just how much some people on the left dislike her.

But many devoted Cruz supporters are considering voting Hillary because they find Trump as such a danger to US politics.

This election is gonna be fucky.
#116988 to #116987 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
The Primaries have been crazy! There's probably lots more crazy to come
#116956 to #116953 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
That's what they said about Cruz supporters
#116935 to #116933 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
RIP shillary
#116918 - anon
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I would gladly be the Adolf Hitler of Sweden, I just don't know how to pull it off
#116966 to #116918 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Hell seger min vän! Dont listen to the thumbawumptrump supporter, he hasnt any ideah what he is speaking about. Like usual.
#116925 to #116918 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Shoot yourself.
#116932 to #116925 - anon
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Not until my work is done.
#116924 to #116915 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
He's good lookin