Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): youregaylol, anonymous(15).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#62495 - anonymous (04/25/2014) [-]
Daily reminder that the people on this board are only one paid shill with at least 5 different accounts, you and me.
User avatar #62728 to #62495 - undeadwill (04/27/2014) [-]
Who is it then?
#62502 to #62495 - netzjager (04/25/2014) [-]
Shills, Shills everywhere
User avatar #62498 to #62495 - liberalgodess (04/25/2014) [-]
Now listen here you little shit. I only have 3 accounts.
#62499 to #62498 - anonymous (04/25/2014) [-]
suck my schlong
User avatar #62500 to #62499 - liberalgodess (04/25/2014) [-]
Quit raping me.
#62519 to #62500 - anonymous (04/25/2014) [-]
Quit being raped.
#62496 to #62495 - anonymous (04/25/2014) [-]
0
#62492 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
0
#62491 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
#62476 - feelythefeel (04/25/2014) [-]
Can you guess which one's worth more as currency?

That's right, it's the carpet.
User avatar #62484 to #62476 - pebar (04/25/2014) [-]
Milton Friedman - The Nature Of Inflation It's a good lecture
User avatar #62486 to #62484 - johnstuartmill (04/25/2014) [-]
Friedminite master race
User avatar #62483 to #62476 - johnstuartmill (04/25/2014) [-]
All I see is carpet, toilet paper, and monopoly money?
#62475 - girrafalopegis (04/25/2014) [-]
"Why has China's communist party state so far proved more durable than that of the Soviet Union?" Any explanation would be much appreciated.
User avatar #62748 to #62475 - undeadwill (04/27/2014) [-]
They actually trade with us.
User avatar #62482 to #62475 - byposted (04/25/2014) [-]
China successfully underwent modernization under Guofeng, while the Soviet Union collapsed before such could be achieved under Gorbachev. This may be explained by the level of culture in Eastern Europe as compared to the Far East.
User avatar #62477 to #62475 - feelythefeel (04/25/2014) [-]
They're actually at around the same age (At least, for countries), and the USSR did burn more bright than long, all things considered.
#62481 to #62474 - pebar (04/25/2014) [-]
I just wanna say.... I love you guys
Except all the nazis
... not including schnitzel, he's tolerable
User avatar #62747 to #62481 - undeadwill (04/27/2014) [-]
I'm going to miss you guys. Who knows maybe we'll all see each other on the battle field.
#62460 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
WE'VE BEEN SHEKELDORFED
User avatar #62478 to #62460 - feelythefeel (04/25/2014) [-]
That's not even a word and I disagree with you.
0
#62473 to #62460 - netzjager has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #62471 to #62460 - netzjager (04/25/2014) [-]
You are right. I didn't get last week's paycheck from the Shill factory. I bet the Nazi Shills don't have to put up with this.
#62497 to #62471 - anonymous (04/25/2014) [-]
choke on your lies, cunt
User avatar #62501 to #62497 - netzjager (04/25/2014) [-]
No worries, I will wash it down with your sweet sweet tears
User avatar #62470 to #62460 - johnstuartmill (04/25/2014) [-]
Is it time the Jewish circle jerk already? I swear you guys have a tsundere thing going on with the Jews.
#62446 - pebar (04/24/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link

RALEIGH, N.C. -
A former Ku Klux Klan leader accused of killing three people in attacks at a Jewish community center in Kansas last week was once arrested when he was caught with a black male prostitute in Raleigh, according to a former federal prosecutor.
User avatar #62480 to #62446 - byposted (04/25/2014) [-]
There exists no record of what occurred, so conclusions cannot be jumped to in the dailyfail fashion. This is all Miller had to say on the issue. Why he would allow Fat Heidi to interview him, I do not know.

Frazier Glenn Miller speaks to SPLC about his violent past

Now, if he was actually having sex with the nigger-faggot, the lack of a record may be explained by some state "deal" he adhered to.
#62469 to #62446 - johnstuartmill (04/25/2014) [-]
He was just showing "white dominance over blacks" and I am pretty sure he said no home so it is all good.
0
#62468 to #62446 - johnstuartmill has deleted their comment [-]
0
#62467 to #62446 - johnstuartmill has deleted their comment [-]
0
#62466 to #62446 - johnstuartmill has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #62450 to #62446 - Shiny (04/24/2014) [-]
Fun fact: in the South, interracial and black pornography is the most popular online by a noticeable margin.

Apparently hatred is a good substitute for Cialis.
#62462 to #62450 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
FUN FACT: WHENEVER FAT BEN FARTS AFTER EATING HOT PEPPERS, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ISSUES A SHELTER-IN-PLACE ORDER FOR THE AREA
User avatar #62448 to #62446 - eight (04/24/2014) [-]
I'm really sick of these bigots. Why do they like to hate on people so much? They're such horrible people.
User avatar #62444 - eight (04/24/2014) [-]
Is America's public education system practically useless? This includes college.
User avatar #62487 to #62444 - akkere (04/25/2014) [-]
The biggest problem with the education system is it doesn't teach children how to apply the information, which is something that would not only bolster retention, but improve motivation as students receive positive results (at least, for STEM-based classes regarding mathematics and sciences).
Hopefully with the rise of entertainment technology, interactive programs may become more available that allow students to engage in simulations allowing them take part in more projects revolving around subject matter (or, in social studies based classes such as history, experience events) to help them better understand it.

I feel like that's why in the STEM field of careers, most companies value an individual's experience moreso than the school they came out of, to the point a lot of colleges now are emphasizing importance in taking part of cooperative programs (paid internships), where they can acquire experience if they have extra time in their semesters.
User avatar #62445 to #62444 - pebar (04/24/2014) [-]
As far as learning is concerned, mostly.
However it does play a part in showing employers you aren't a dumbass; college shows employers you're at least competent.
User avatar #62447 to #62445 - eight (04/24/2014) [-]
I don't know about that. I've seen some pretty stupid people graduate college. All they have to do is memorize trivia in order to pass. Weeks and months afterward, they hardly remember anything.

I think a degree just shows that you have the dedication to wake up every morning and attend school with at least some level of lucidity.
User avatar #62463 to #62447 - johnstuartmill (04/24/2014) [-]
I can see that in intro level classes but when you take enough classes the curriculum will be at a level where you have to learn and not just memorize. College algebra vs Calculus.
User avatar #62465 to #62463 - eight (04/25/2014) [-]
That isn't exactly my point.

People who learn calculus and don't use it after graduating usually forget how to do it, because it's essentially useless trivia that they learned at the time just to pass an exam and move on towards the goal of getting a slip of paper. The content of these courses, unfortunately is often unnecessary for many if not most people, yet the curriculum will require it. Calculus is just one of many of those courses.
User avatar #62472 to #62465 - johnstuartmill (04/25/2014) [-]
Oh well then yes a lot of classes are like that but some fields you do use the knowledge you learned in college. Lawyers, doctors, and engineers are the three I could name off the top of my head that need the experience you learn in college to work in the field, but I am sure like you said there are classes that you could have not taken and it would have no affect on you what so ever.
User avatar #62443 - schnizel (04/24/2014) [-]
yo jew commi nazi
Are you still a communist?
User avatar #62452 to #62451 - schnizel (04/24/2014) [-]
Why?
You are falling into jewlry.
User avatar #62454 to #62452 - jewishcommunazi (04/24/2014) [-]
Ethnicity and religious beliefs are generally irrelevant for commies.
User avatar #62458 to #62454 - pebar (04/24/2014) [-]
I thought commies believed religion was created by the boozshwazy in order to control the masses.
User avatar #62459 to #62458 - jewishcommunazi (04/24/2014) [-]
Yes, that too, but usually, communists only need to worry about religion in extreme cases. It'd be stupid to focus on promoting atheism when people don't really share extreme religious convictions that conflict with "revolutionary" principles.

It's either about how it can create "barriers" between the working class, or how they expect change to come from a "heavenly authority" instead of being themselves to bring change to their benefit. Apart from that, it doesn't really matter, I think.
User avatar #62456 to #62454 - schnizel (04/24/2014) [-]
You are nothing more than blobs of red with terror in their hands and a civilization to destroy.
User avatar #62457 to #62456 - jewishcommunazi (04/24/2014) [-]
I want civilization to progress, not be destroyed. I assume by terror, you refer to us using violence sometimes. I agree violence isn't always the solution, but it's probably way more effective than unconditional pacifism.
#62489 to #62457 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
Be advised.
User avatar #62490 to #62489 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
An Ipad doesn't make you a burgeois, owning the means of production under capitalism does.
And the rich capitalists may move their money all they want, but they can't get rid of the actual things they need in order to make that money.
And it doesn't look like the guy has any clue about what he's talking about.
#62494 to #62490 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
What's wrong with owning the means of production?   
>but they can't get rid of the actual things they need in order to make that money.    
Explain.
What's wrong with owning the means of production?
>but they can't get rid of the actual things they need in order to make that money.
Explain.
User avatar #62506 to #62494 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
"What's wrong with owning the means of production?"
Nothing. Which is why we want to do just that ourselves.

">but they can't get rid of the actual things they need in order to make that money.
Explain."

Most of their means of production, for example.
User avatar #62508 to #62506 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
>Nothing. Which is why we want to do just that ourselves.
What?
User avatar #62510 to #62508 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
Socialism = Workers' ownership over the means of production.
User avatar #62516 to #62510 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
Go further, that's not a clear definition.
User avatar #62521 to #62516 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
Under capitalism, the burgeoisie (AKA the ruling class) owns the means of production and controls the state, the proletariat makes a living by selling its labour to the burgeoisie.

If the proletariat isn't happy with the conditions, a socialist revolution may happen and then the plan is that the working class overthrows the capitalist state and replaces it with a socialist or workers' state and so it takes control over the means of production and then the working class manages itself without the need for any class to rule them.
User avatar #62528 to #62521 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
And how did that work out?
User avatar #62534 to #62528 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
You may have won this cold battle, but you haven't won this cold war.
User avatar #62535 to #62534 - schnizel (04/25/2014) [-]
Are we going to play RO2?
User avatar #62537 to #62535 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
What's your Steam name?
User avatar #62536 to #62535 - jewishcommunazi (04/25/2014) [-]
Fine by me.
User avatar #62455 to #62454 - schnizel (04/24/2014) [-]
That's the thing I'm talking about.
#62437 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
daily reminder that homosexuality and transgenderism is a jwshish plot to lower birthrates of white people.
User avatar #62464 to #62437 - johnstuartmill (04/24/2014) [-]
If you can prove to me that a Jew can make me homosexual and transsexual, then I will give you the D.
User avatar #62449 to #62437 - Shiny (04/24/2014) [-]
Since when can nonwhites not be gay?
#62453 to #62449 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
they are not the target audience
#62441 to #62437 - netzjager (04/24/2014) [-]
Yep, then wait till the Jews find out all the black people want their white women, then we shall see who will have the last laugh
#62442 to #62441 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
>their white women
>jws
>white

good one, chaim
#62438 to #62437 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
A daily reminder there are no gay black people. ever.
#62439 to #62438 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
only a few
doesn´t make a difference, the majority of fags are white.
#62461 to #62439 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
They are not as open about it as whites and asians are and for a good reason.

Erotic pic bro.
User avatar #62426 - feelythefeel (04/24/2014) [-]
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/21/americas-oligarchy-not-democracy-or-republic-unive/

Apparently the U.S.A is considered by a Princeton and Northwestern university study to be a fully fledged oligarchy. Discuss.
#62430 to #62426 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
I'm starting to have less and less faith in these studies.

It's gotten to the point where people will believe anything if they hear that sophomoric jerkoff from harvard says it.

The Ivy League reminds me of the NFL.

Attending one is like wearing a football jersey, but instead of numbers and icons you're saying "Hey world, I'm smart, listen to me like I'm god."
User avatar #62429 to #62426 - netzjager (04/24/2014) [-]
I would not say "Fully Fledged" would be an appropriate term only because we still function as a Democracy, but it is believable that the US is controlled by an Elite group and this case, that would be Pebar's examples who decide everything. One of the reason this has happened is because of voter apathy and the reliance on the two party system.

Voter turn out is about 60% for Presidential Elections and even less in Off Year Elections for Senators and Congressman with people usually voting for their party on loyalty. This gives the politicians leeway on the job as long as the bill they vote for does not get to much media attention.

This does not help new voters who have to choose between two candidates who do not line up with their view in mind. If you do not agree with the two Primary Parties, then your view is as good as null. This leads to many Senators and Congressman staying in office because they do not have limited terms and have Constituent Campaign Benefits that can cut their campaign funds by a large amount, making it harder for challengers to win the Elections unless they mud fling their opponents.
User avatar #62427 to #62426 - pebar (04/24/2014) [-]
I believe it
Supreme court justices serve for life
so many politicians in congress have been there for decades
the federal government blatantly ignores state authority
User avatar #62424 - philliyoMLB (04/23/2014) [-]
So, I live in Kansas City, Kansas and if you've heard Michelle Obama accepted an invitation to go speak at a Topeka high school's graduation. Instead she is being met with some criticism because she might take the kid's spotlight, here is a bullshit left-nutjob's blog on it: www.huffingtonpost.com/jerome-halligan/michelle-obama-topeka-graduation-satire_b_5186937.html

Now, I'm a senior and I'll be graduating soon also from the number 1 school academically in the state of Kansas which is a public school. And tons of people are inviting her to come speak at our school. And of course since I'm one of the few white people in my class I am being called racist for this reaction to the idea of Michelle Obama speaking at our graduation.
I wouldn't wanna go to that graduation because her husband is trying to get everyone to sign up for this huuuuuug healthcare plan and their main problem is that young people are not signing up for it, you think she just wants to speak at high schools just to inspire some kids? No, she's a politician just like her husband and I don't wanna sit through a long speech telling us why we should sign up for Obamacare. I mean to have the first lady there would be awesome, but please, that day is for us, not politics.
what you thing /pol/?
User avatar #62428 to #62424 - netzjager (04/24/2014) [-]
Agreed with Akkere, it would be politically damaging to speak about Healthcare to graduates and completely backwards to lecture If it is the #1 high school in Kansas, than I'll assume they are college bound college students about eating healthy that Ramen Diet . It would be best for her to just visit and say a few words of congratulations 2 sentences at most and not a whole speech. That way, she visited and did not take away from the student's event and would not have the opportunity to place anything political in her speech.
User avatar #62425 to #62424 - akkere (04/23/2014) [-]
While it's usually expected to have some kind of famous guest speaker appear for a given graduation, I'm not sure if it's really ideal to have one of a political nature, especially one that wasn't so much as a local resident of that area. And the amount of race-baiting in this issue is rather irritating.

That being said, I doubt she'll take the spotlight and try to actively convince graduates to sign up for Obamacare, knowing full well she'd receive a fair shotgun blast of backlash from the parents, and any education officials that prefer to not have a partisan pea in a non-partisan soup. The closest thing she'll talk about is something relating to her health meal shtick, and how the graduates should totally let that influence their eating habits as they transcend into adulthood.

Either way, there are certain zones in my opinion that should be isolate from any and all outside influences, especially political and religious, and I'd think Graduation ceremonies would be one of them. It'd be more understandable if Michelle Obama was say... a graduate of that high school, or even was simply a resident of the town for some time in her youth, but I don't even think she was born in the state.
#62402 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
ONE DAY, SCHNIZEL PUSHED THE FAT BEN'S POOP BUTTON

O!!!!!!! M!!!!!!!!!!! F!!!!!!!!!!!!!! G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar #62390 - revengeforfreeze (04/23/2014) [-]
I heard an American say "pretty good" the other day on a restaurant. My life is complete.
User avatar #62396 to #62391 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I am confused.
#62389 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
daily reminder
#62431 to #62389 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
Daily reminder that buildings post-chechen war is bult to last. Note the chechen wars officially ended in 2009, but there are still a few skirmishes in the deep caucasus.
Daily reminder that the north and south towers Way more taller and made in the 70s was hit with a fucking plane.
Ask for WTC7, too mutch shit for me to dig into right now.
#62432 to #62431 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
Scrash post chechen wars, Russian architecture.
User avatar #62394 to #62389 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (04/23/2014) [-]
It was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7.
#62433 to #62394 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62392 to #62389 - pebar (04/23/2014) [-]
Did it have a plane crash into the top of it?
Did you learn about torque in high school?
#62393 to #62392 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
MUH WIND   
MUH BUILDINGS FALL DOWN LIKE A DECK OF CARDS BECAUSE OF A PLANE BUT NOT BECAUSE IT WAS DESTROYED FROM THE INSIDE
MUH WIND
MUH BUILDINGS FALL DOWN LIKE A DECK OF CARDS BECAUSE OF A PLANE BUT NOT BECAUSE IT WAS DESTROYED FROM THE INSIDE
User avatar #62399 to #62393 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Well lets do some logic.
1. A plane hits a tower.
2. The plane penetrates the towers walls.
3. The plane crash weakens the structural integrity.
4. The tower, not being built to take a plane to the face, loses its ability to hold the upper floors.
5. The upper floors collapse in on itself bringing the whole tower down.

#62434 to #62399 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62400 to #62399 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes, but not enough to destroy the entire tower.
Also
>Believes what the US gov said
User avatar #62404 to #62400 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I am not going to do the physics now but the planes were going about 300 mph minimum and the planes weighs on average 1,900 pounds so I would say 1 plane is more than enough to bring the structural integrity down enough to collapse the building.
#62435 to #62404 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
yeah, keep telling yourself that.
User avatar #62411 to #62405 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
That gif is hilarious just saying.
1. NIST investigates lied. Ok I will play along. Does that give me proof that the building can withstand a Boeing going at 300 mph? No, all it says is 2 things: A cover up or lack of competence. Knowing the U.S. Government I would say the latter, but the former is a possibility.

2. Molten steel and underground fire. What does this prove? Besides the fact that the NIST spokesman lied, It was extremely hot above the ground floors. How did I come to this conclusion? "It was like molten steel running down the channel ways" Key word "running down" (1:00-1:12). The underground fires came from the molten steel just to point that out.
User avatar #62413 to #62411 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
> A cover up
They are to smart to fuck it up.
User avatar #62412 to #62411 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
The fire from the plane could not been high enough to melt steel.
Hitting it with a plane would be like throwing a granade on a tank.
User avatar #62414 to #62412 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Why would they purposefully allow a fuck up? What do they gain?

The fuel would lower the integrity of the steel by 60%-80% allowing for the building to collapse and then from there you have a huge furnace which would allow the fire to increase into temperature.

What gain comes from this overall scheme?
User avatar #62415 to #62414 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
No.
The fuel needs to be duble the heat from the flame to even start to melt it.
War, and with war profit.
And a ritual :^)
User avatar #62416 to #62415 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Fuel has around 1700 degress while steel needs 2500 but when the heat and fire are contained underground the temperature goes up it is like an oven.

That was actually really obvious....

Which one?
User avatar #62417 to #62416 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
It didn't go that much, the elevators snapped the beams are cut and the sections were blow one by on or the building would have collapsed around NY.
IT was a controled demolition.

IDK man my friend from the hmmm said it's about the burning of the three towers and some kind of link betwen god and men was broken or some shit.
User avatar #62418 to #62417 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I find it hard to believe it was a controlled demolition but I got to go so I am cutting this short.

Ya you might want to get him checked out... that is kind of weird
User avatar #62419 to #62418 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
Nope, he is from the club.
And no goy, trust your goverment.
No building falls like that if it isn't demolished by pros and done by a procedure.
User avatar #62420 to #62419 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I do not even trust the government to tell me what food is healthy. I am just not convinced the WTC was an inside job, or an outside job for that matter.
#62401 to #62400 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
you skipped 4 and 5
User avatar #62403 to #62401 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
3 needs to be proven in order to go to 4 and 5.
#62436 to #62407 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
nice bomb hole
User avatar #62408 to #62407 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
Oh look, a hole in a building.
#62410 to #62409 - schnizel (04/23/2014) [-]
5 years under constant artillery and air barrages.
I've got no speakers.
#62386 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
This board in a nut shell.  I am surprised that I have not seen this posted regularly here
This board in a nut shell. I am surprised that I have not seen this posted regularly here
#62440 to #62386 - anonymous (04/24/2014) [-]
more like your mom in a nutshell, fgt
#62384 - feelythefeel (04/23/2014) [-]
An alternate answer is "Post secondary education in fields that aren't literally worthless".
User avatar #62385 to #62384 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
We are looking at you Woman Studies. This degree heavily implies that it is possible to understand women
User avatar #62387 to #62385 - pebar (04/23/2014) [-]
www.ndsu.edu/majors/womnstud/
My uni says it should be taken along with something else as a double major.
User avatar #62388 to #62387 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
I do not see the practical application of majoring in it, even if you are double majoring.
User avatar #62376 - feelythefeel (04/23/2014) [-]
Who is your favourite political figure and why is it Aberdolf Lincler?
User avatar #62381 to #62376 - johnstuartmill (04/23/2014) [-]
Calvin Coolidge, not because of his policies but mainly because he is a president that would be awesome to have.
#62377 to #62376 - anonymous (04/23/2014) [-]
2525
 Friends (0)