Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (3): jewishcommunazi, metalstorm, nadam, anonymous(26).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #64632 - tredbear (06/15/2014) [-]
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2656344/Russia-sent-three-tanks-armoured-military-vehicles-help-pro-Russian-rebels-claims-Ukraines-interior-minister.html

can someone download this video for me and put it on dropbox or something?

the original was deleted by Western media on youtube, and I want to have this on my hard drive before this one goes as well.
User avatar #64633 to #64632 - tredbear (06/15/2014) [-]
Nvm, I recorded it with FFsplit and cropped it out and shit

I have a whole collection of these censored videos on my computer, if you guys would like, I can upload them to dropbox if you want?
User avatar #64628 - Shiny ONLINE (06/15/2014) [-]
So much... uhh... political discussion.
User avatar #64711 to #64628 - undeadwill (06/17/2014) [-]
You mean circle jerking.
User avatar #64625 - cedrock (06/15/2014) [-]
I need more live news updates like this:
twitter.com/MidEastNews
twitter.com/MiddleEast_BRK

I don't want to miss a thing on this happening. Lebanese TV sucks.
#64627 to #64625 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
There is so much happening at the moment
User avatar #64629 to #64627 - cedrock (06/15/2014) [-]
You don't consider ISIS a happening? Also russia and ukraine?
Plus, wouldn't hurt to have a link of something in case something "happens" in your context.
#64619 - bitchpleaseshutup (06/15/2014) [-]
As-salamu alaykum This shouldn't be happening. It's all over
#64626 to #64619 - pebar (06/15/2014) [-]
Now don't you wish you had a constitution that specifically stated that the government shall make no law based on religion?
Now don't you wish you had a constitution that specifically stated that the government shall make no law based on religion?
#64645 to #64626 - youregaylol (06/16/2014) [-]
Whats to stop the muslims from overbreeding, getting a majority among the lawmakers, and changing all the laws to conform with sharia in everything but name?

What good would the constitution serve then? Or better yet, whats to stop them from changing the constitution once they have brainwashed the populace?

Democracy is an ineffective system and a constitution is meaningless if it's ideals are not defended with force. The only way to prevent the spread of dangerous ideologies that contrast with the constitution is to have a specialized constitutional guard that will eliminate any threats. One ideology, one culture, one people, unchanging and uncompromising, without that you're setting yourself up for failure and subjugation.
User avatar #64652 to #64645 - pebar (06/16/2014) [-]
The great thing about strong constitutions like the US's is that they are uncompromising. You need a hell of a lot more than a majority to change them.
#64656 to #64652 - youregaylol (06/16/2014) [-]
The constitution means nothing if people don't defend it's content. If the supreme court can ignore certain provisions, and if lawmakers are only interested in appealing to the mobs, then a constitution is doomed.

You have to make a clear ideological statement, and defend that statement with force, meaning that anybody who is against the constitution in any way shape or form should be dealt with appropriately. The US has no desire to defend it's ideology and as such it will fail. It's as simple as that.
#64667 to #64656 - pebar (06/16/2014) [-]
According to you, we should forcibly remove people like you for not supporting the freedom of expression of ideas and equal treatment under the law regardless of race.
#64677 to #64667 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
Yes, and in doing so you'd prevent "people like me" from destroying your ideals, naive as they may be. See how that works? It's a doomed belief if you don't have the spine to defend it.

Also I'm completely in support of equal treatment among the races of the world, what I don't support is multiculturalism, race mixing, and pointless diversification. Separate races, separate cultures, separate nations. Each people being allowed to prosper amongst themselves. Anything else is destructive.
0
#64651 to #64645 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
#64624 to #64619 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/15/2014) [-]
Muslims aren't taking over Britain. Britain is giving itself to them.
#64620 to #64619 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
There is still the rise of the right-wing populists :3

User avatar #64717 to #64620 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Can someone go there for just a day and get crunk at a party, wasted on alcohol, throwing away all your money on gambling because you're higher than a kite on the marijuanas you injected all while wearing a bikini?

Fuck it, I'm doing that.
#64718 to #64717 - alimais (06/17/2014) [-]
Sounds like a totally good idea
User avatar #64719 to #64718 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
I'd die like a lived.

Screwing the rules as if I have money.
User avatar #64720 to #64719 - alimais (06/17/2014) [-]
And end up as halal
User avatar #64721 to #64720 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Here's hoping I end up as a good meat loaf or something then.
#64623 to #64620 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/15/2014) [-]
Isnt that coppecap?
#64621 to #64620 - bitchpleaseshutup (06/15/2014) [-]
Have you guys thought of building a big ass fence like we have in the States. But seriously, it seems like radicals are fucking Europe up.
#64622 to #64621 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
EU open border politics,

I blame the Jews

Jewish multicultural plan to destroy Europe
#64605 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
Lel, the most interesting part starts at 6:30

Redpills Vs Lies
User avatar #64716 to #64605 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Wow, two of the most cancerous political groups of history are joining forces.

I just hope none of them breed.
#64614 to #64605 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
Ya I was curious so I googled some videos by some of these Black jew groups. Their rejection of mainstream jewry is admirable, but they still show classic ghetto mannerism common among low class negroids.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe5K7GI5h6s

They go full retard in this vid.
User avatar #64615 to #64614 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
The black preacher in the first video isn't one of the black Hebrews.

The black hebrews are fun to watch but are Caucasian-phobic and preach against the "white devil" may he be Ashkenazi or Christian.
#64616 to #64615 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
I have to admit they're entertaining.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFJRyRu89Ek

Listen to what he says at the beginning, something along the lines of black people taught Europeans how to speak English. Then something about how Negroids ruled Europe for 1000 years. I'm just happy his stupidity was released on occupy morons.
#64617 to #64616 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
Also just pointing this out to anyone who wants to lol.

Skip to 3:25
0
#64613 to #64605 - youregaylol has deleted their comment [-]
#64612 to #64605 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
I really can't listen to black gospel style preaching. It annoys me to no end.
User avatar #64607 to #64606 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
I really like black preachers, they are fun to watch and to listen to.

Black Hebrews make a Khazar Jew kid cry
User avatar #64608 to #64607 - schnizel (06/15/2014) [-]
I remember that video, laughed my ass off.
#64599 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
I've never been one to shy away from my admiration for German National Socialists. Their racial polices added with their strong sense of national duty revitalized their country and provided the greatest barrier to Jewish Bolshevism. However, one of the things that has always bothered me was the insistence on the Nordic position of master race. This seems completely without merit when you observe history.

Northern Europeans have always been the barbarians of Europe, going back to before Rome. Even today their weakness is being exposed by the non resistance to Jewish propaganda in their countries. I cannot think of any accomplishment of their collective race that outshines the grandeur of Rome, Greece, and Mesopotamia. Not to mention Carthage and Egypt. It seems obvious that the true master race would be the Mediterranean people originally of Southern Europe and Northern Africa.

The fair skinned blue eyed race has little to no redeeming qualities besides the possibility of they themselves being an offshoot of the Mediterraneans. I have also found them to be naive and susceptible to foreign influence.

The people of pitch black hair, white olive skin, and hazel/green/brown eyes are much more worthy of the title.
User avatar #64604 to #64599 - schnizel (06/15/2014) [-]
Rom invigda : DDD
#64598 - mexicoman (06/15/2014) [-]
I don't like these newer terms to describe sexual orientation. I don't understand what separates a pansexual from a bisexual, for instance. I heard that a Demisexual is just a person who only feels attraction if they feel a strong bond (IE: Are in love). Which to me is just another way of saying that your standards of attraction are emotionally higher than most, which says nothing about which sex you like to get down with. I think people have lost the point of sexual orientation. Its not there so that people can advertise to the world how different they are or the minutia of how they perceive sex and romance, its there so that people can warn me before I go hitting on a lesbian. I think people are trying really fucking hard to be special and its disdainfully transparent. And this new age shit is being sponsored by well meaning sheep who are trying to fight for the rights and social acceptance of the LGBT community, as well as those shrill, whiny little busters who are looking to make enemies out of anyone who doesn't know what their obscure label means when they use it in their neverending quest to vindicate a persecution complex.

As far as im concerned all we need straight, gay, bi, or asexual. Its not our job to make sure that you never have to answer some questions about how you live with whichever of those four you fall under.
User avatar #64658 to #64598 - ribocoon (06/16/2014) [-]
I'm not fond of the fact that gender identity is lumped in with sexuality
User avatar #64655 to #64598 - undeadwill (06/16/2014) [-]
pans dates trans

bi doesn't. something like that.
#64589 - tredbear (06/15/2014) [-]
Ukraine War 2014 | Tanks and Trucks came to help the Donbass | June 11, 2014

this scares me

I think Russia finally did it

I think they decided to start sending in troops and heavy equipment into Ukraine to help Donetsk on the fronts.

shit just got a hell of a lot more serious
User avatar #64611 to #64589 - screwyouman (06/15/2014) [-]
Russia nor Ukraine can risk Civil War. That would be like blowing on your own stack of cards.
User avatar #64631 to #64611 - tredbear (06/15/2014) [-]
shit, the footage is gone, do you have link to another one of the same video?
User avatar #64603 to #64589 - alimais (06/15/2014) [-]
I rather think that the Ukraine gov made a embarrassment out of themselves again and their stuff got taken again.
#64574 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Observe a perfect example of a jewish shill.   
www.funnyjunk.com/jungle+fever/funny-pictures/5182503/   
   
Posts content titled jungle fever showing white whores with niggers. Claims that she just did it for the luls. But then deletes comments like a bitch and encourages anti white comments.
Observe a perfect example of a jewish shill.
www.funnyjunk.com/jungle+fever/funny-pictures/5182503/

Posts content titled jungle fever showing white whores with niggers. Claims that she just did it for the luls. But then deletes comments like a bitch and encourages anti white comments.
#64591 to #64586 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
Help me out here, is autismo defined as basically shooting at each other?
User avatar #64592 to #64591 - feelythefeel (06/15/2014) [-]
I don't know, ask icewraith.
#64593 to #64592 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
Help me out here, is icewraith defined as basically shooting at each other.

I mean you're the expert here.
#64595 to #64594 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
tl;dr ur dumb
User avatar #64585 to #64574 - pebar (06/14/2014) [-]
are you white?
#64600 to #64585 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
In america I would just be considered white, but my racial history can be traced back to Italy.
User avatar #64601 to #64600 - pebar (06/15/2014) [-]
And would any amount of race mixing change your racial history?
Would it somehow turn you black?
#64602 to #64601 - youregaylol (06/15/2014) [-]
Anybody who has at least one black grandparent is black. It's called the one drop rule. If you have a black great grandparent you're still not entirely "white". I can trace my family all the way back to the beginning of the 20th century. My mother's family has some Albanian but over 80% of my racial makeup is of Italian descent and 100% is of Mediterranean descent.

I share all the characteristics of a southern European, pitch black hair, hazel eyes, a narrow nose, above average body hair, a masculine frame, and a pronounced jaw.

If I was to breed with a black woman and disgrace my heritage then I would still not be black. My child would be however.
User avatar #64571 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Should we try to impose a law that says you cannot breed if you fall under the spectrum of sociopathy/psychopathy?
User avatar #64597 to #64571 - mexicoman (06/15/2014) [-]
I don't agree with victimless crime laws. No one is really hurt by the act of a psychopath breeding, and I don't think that people should be denied their constitutional rights just because of how they were born. I think we should treat sociopathy and psychopathy with economic sterilization incentives. Maybe we enact some kind of regulation about not allowing people who have sociopathy or psychopathy to run for public office or be police officers if we can find concrete statistical evidence that they're not capable of handling the jobs as well as everyone else. In that same way we might regulate people with the genes that make one predisposed towards pedophilia, if we have some data to back it up with. I don't really like the idea of fucking with people based upon what genes they carry, but if there's an intelligent way to mitigate the problems without being inhumane I think we should be open to such methods.
#64576 to #64571 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm not sure about that but I wouldn't be opposed to some selective breeding laws.
User avatar #64577 to #64576 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
Or simply forced sterilization.
#64579 to #64577 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
I would only consider that in cases where an ethnic minority is getting to uppity with it's breeding. Otherwise each race should be allowed to flourish amongst it's own kind.
User avatar #64580 to #64579 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm not thinking so much about race. I'm thinking about people without the capacity to feel empathy and such things.
#64581 to #64580 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
They could still be of use to society if they are made to be loyal to their country. The military comes to mind.
User avatar #64582 to #64581 - revengeforfreeze (06/14/2014) [-]
>Implying you could ever control a person like that
#64583 to #64582 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
You'd be surprised what regimentation can do to a person.
User avatar #64562 - schnizel (06/14/2014) [-]
I'm back.
User avatar #64563 to #64562 - alimais (06/14/2014) [-]
where were you
User avatar #64567 to #64563 - schnizel (06/14/2014) [-]
Spain.
#64560 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
BEING gay/LESBIAN SHOULDN'T BE LEGAL!



...and nor should it be illegal. Sexuality shouldn't concern the law any more than nationality or religion does. It's an unnecessary debate on equality when society cant even learn to accept other people for their other differences, let alone their sexuality.

Also I find it hypocritical how we can go on all day making fun of blacks, yet you say one wrong thing about a homosexual, and suddenly you're Hitler.
User avatar #64584 to #64560 - alimais (06/14/2014) [-]
Well, then why don't you fight for LGBT rights in the Middle East and Africa where LGBT is literally illegal in most places.
User avatar #64570 to #64560 - pebar (06/14/2014) [-]
Also, there is no debate over making homosexuality illegal.
The debate is over changing the definition of marriage.
User avatar #64565 to #64560 - pebar (06/14/2014) [-]
I don't think you know what legal means
#64537 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
IRS: "Uhh, we can't give you Lerner's e-mails. Our computers, um, crashed and deleted all of them. Yeah, that's it."
#64590 to #64559 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/15/2014) [-]
Your graphics settings are horrible. This is how it looks for me.
#64522 - utarefson (06/13/2014) [-]
What is the purpose of abolishing gender stereotypes when many have made it quite clear that gender and sex are different things? In that case, shouldn't it be "sex stereotypes"? And if that's the case, then what IS gender, if not just a sex's stereotype, other than an excuse to get into the opposite sex's bathroom?   
I don't fucking get it.
What is the purpose of abolishing gender stereotypes when many have made it quite clear that gender and sex are different things? In that case, shouldn't it be "sex stereotypes"? And if that's the case, then what IS gender, if not just a sex's stereotype, other than an excuse to get into the opposite sex's bathroom?
I don't fucking get it.
User avatar #64587 to #64561 - ablueguy (06/14/2014) [-]
I like that.
I think I might print that out and pin it up somewhere in my college.
User avatar #64530 to #64522 - maddboiy (06/13/2014) [-]
Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed and imposed upon people through the stereotypes of masculinity and femininity. Abolishing gender stereotypes is getting rid of the importance of a persons gender in life. I.e women can have the same jobs as men because there is no gender stereotype against them that women shouldn't work. Getting rid of gender stereotypes means equality between men and women essentially as men and women are different naturally by sex but this should not determine their lives, in other words it challenges the idea that 'biology is destiny'.
User avatar #64531 to #64530 - utarefson (06/13/2014) [-]
Based on that description, it sounds like gender is a stereotype, then, which would mean if we get rid of gender stereotypes, we get rid of gender as a whole, thus making transgender irrelevant.
User avatar #64533 to #64531 - maddboiy (06/13/2014) [-]
yeah basically, one of the aims of feminism is that of universal personhood, this being through the removal of gender
#64529 to #64522 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
They just make things up as they go along.
#64505 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/12/2014) [-]
I've heard that there were no significant fire arm reforms since Sandy Hook. Though I'm pretty sure that's just focused on the federal level.
Have there been any changes in any state laws?
User avatar #64506 to #64505 - aceofshadows (06/13/2014) [-]
My high school decided that students can no longer walk outside as a faster way to get to class.
#64496 - youregaylol (06/12/2014) [-]
Joyfully awaiting the day when the jewish police force is destroyed by an armed peoples militia, when the rich profiteers are dragged out of their caves, when the media spinsters and celebrity shills are stripped of their wealth and tried for treason, when the foreign invaders are rounded up and sent back to their shit hole, when their shit hole is then burned to the ground, when the inferior parasite caste is destroyed, when anti white race traitors are shipped to africa, when the streets run red with Liberal democrat blood, when the Bolsheviks lose their hold on socialism, and when each nation on earth is home to a singular race and culture.
#64564 to #64496 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
"I love getting fisted by masculine Jews" - you
#64566 to #64564 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
" "I love getting fisted by masculine Jews" - you "-12 year old
#64568 to #64566 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
"Getting gangbanged by gay Jew liberals has always been my dream" - You
#64569 to #64568 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Does this pass for humor in your middle school.
#64572 to #64569 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
You tell me "youregaylol", does it pass in yours?
#64573 to #64572 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
>taking a meaningless username on an image sharing site seriously
#64575 to #64573 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
"My dream guy is big, masculine, black jew gay liberal who votes hillary clinton <3" - you
#64588 to #64578 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/14/2014) [-]
yfw
User avatar #64513 to #64496 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
You should probably listen when they tell you to take your meds.
#64514 to #64513 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
A common shill tactic is to accuse critics of being mentally unsound. They can't stand an actual argument because they don't truly understand the ideas of their masters, so they resort to discrediting their opponents. Your failed ideology is based off of collective group thought and mob ethics, you have no new ideas and if you did they would surely suit the vision of Zion. You are a puppet with many masters, all hiding behind a veil of supposed progress and media saturation.

You are a tool.
User avatar #64515 to #64514 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
>they can't stand an actual argument
How is you talking about how you want to oppress and murder everyone you don't like an argument again? Is it the same kind of way that ebonics are now championship grade debate material?
#64517 to #64515 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
You cannot oppress oppressors, you can only defend against them and prepare for their next assault. How is a nation supposed to survive with the enemy in its backyard? They would portray themselves as victims but they have been eating away at society for years, should the nation be resigned to extinction because some don't wish to get better? Ridiculous. You cannot argue with the enemy of the people. The people cannot argue away the slavery of the mind, no more so than you can reason with an ant. You can only exterminate it.

Democracy is the biggest lie in history. You cannot expect masses of people who have been brainwashed by bought media and government programs to act in their best interests. All you do is solidify the position of your masters. That is why you can't argue with fake socialists and liberal democrats, they are beyond help.
User avatar #64518 to #64517 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
I recognise that there are some problems, but you're still being a paranoid quack.
#64519 to #64518 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
You recognize nothing but the will of those who control you, you cannot be helped.

Better to end those with your condition than suffer through another 50 years of failure.
User avatar #64520 to #64519 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
Let me posit this; Assuming for a moment that you're insane, would you be able to recognise it?
#64521 to #64520 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
Have you stopped beating your wife? Get your childish non questions out of here, they only work on the weak willed.
User avatar #64523 to #64521 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
While we're at it, aren't changing the subject and shrugging off valid opposing points as "Childish non-questions" classic "JIDF" tactics? Or does that only apply to people that aren't you?
#64524 to #64523 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
You're in full shill mode. You changed the subject first with that laughable "question" that can easily be applied to anybody in any discussion, it's not a valid point, it's a childish distraction. If I would have "answered" that I'd discredit myself by acknowledging your pathetic gotcha attempt.
User avatar #64525 to #64524 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
It couldn't be directed at anyone because you're literally the one talking about committing mass murder.
#64526 to #64525 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
There is no such thing as murder between combatants. And yes it can be applied to anyone in any situation. "Oh you dont support ____? Are you insane? lol if you were insane how would you know lol? You're so insane dude.Haha gotcha bro XD".

It's childish, and you should feel ashamed for posting it.
User avatar #64527 to #64526 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
So those businessmen, minorities and other various "undesirables" are combatants? On what grounds? Who did literally every minority kill or even harm to deserve being treated as an enemy combatant by their own country?

The people you're proposing we kill and oppress aren't combatants, thus making your proposition an act of mass murder and a general crime against humanity. That's the kind of thing insanity is generally considered to made made of.
#64528 to #64527 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
Do you consider the individual ant when you destroy a colony threatening your lawn? They are a part of the problem, benefactors of the war on society. Some don't openly use weapons, but they used underhanded tactics like bribery, mass breeding, and media manipulation. You advocate waiting until society is lost, and that is why you are one of the ants.

The true crime against humanity is the jewish anti white agenda, and that is what is being fought against.
User avatar #64534 to #64528 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
And you wonder why people call you insane.
#64538 to #64534 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Oh wow, you called me insane again. I was totally expecting you to come up with something relevant, but no, you surprised me by once again repeating a tired meaningless insult. I wonder why that is?
User avatar #64539 to #64538 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
A tired truth still rings true.
#64541 to #64539 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
I believe you believe you're speaking the truth. Dogs tend to follow the path set by their owner.
User avatar #64553 to #64541 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
Tell me how that isn't the logic you're using. You've "Dismissed" everything I've said as some form of evil, with everything from shill to Marxism, without actually addressing the point.
#64556 to #64553 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
What non existent point have I not addressed? I rebutted all of your "arguments" because they're wrong. I have ignored your pathetic insults if thats what you mean. I know how your mind works, you have no point so you attempt to portray the conversation as something else. It does not work on me.
User avatar #64550 to #64541 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
"Everything I don't like is Satan, and anyone who disagrees is brainwashed"

And you wonder why people say talking to you is like talking to a brick wall. There's literally nothing I can say that would convince you of anything.
#64552 to #64550 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Strawman, you can't come up with a rebuttal to what I'm actually saying so you come up with ridiculous things like this.

""Everything I don't like is Satan, and anyone who disagrees is brainwashed""

Once again, childish. And your brick wall claim could easily be applied to yourself in any argument. You have no argumentative ability.
User avatar #64545 to #64541 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
You pretend to know me as you're calling me a communist, which I haven't been in a long while.

That's like me calling you Kal-El while claiming to know everything about you. I'm not the ignorant one here.
#64547 to #64545 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Once again, you reveal your own ignorance. Marx has infiltrated the entire left wing spectrum, including the weak minded social democrats. But the fact that you once claimed to be a communist speaks wonders.
User avatar #64542 to #64541 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
Funny, because I don't remember even meeting half of the people you're accusing me of being owned by, never mind signing away my soul to them.
#64544 to #64542 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Lol, you reveal your own ignorance. You don't have to meet you puppet master to be controlled by him. The media saturates your mind, the commercialism engulfs your perspective, and Marx has infiltrated your opinions.

Once again, you are a tool.
#64535 to #64534 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/13/2014) [-]
inb4 "And you wonder why people call you a shill"
#64504 to #64496 - economicfreedom (06/12/2014) [-]
You a nation for your race?
The Jews want a nation for their race too.

YFW
#64510 to #64504 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
The jews are the enemy of the races of the world and deserve no such land. If you conspire against other peoples you have no right to a land for your people. Besides the jews have no right to Palestine. It would be different if they subjugated the indigenous populace by virtue of their own racial strength and superiority, but they simply used underhanded tactics and smear campaigns to achieve their power.
User avatar #64511 to #64510 - economicfreedom (06/13/2014) [-]
They're protecting their land from foreign invaders, just like you want.
#64512 to #64511 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
>implying its their land by right
>implying the "foreign invaders" aren't really natives in an occupied country
User avatar #64489 - undeadwill (06/12/2014) [-]
Rommel > Hitler
User avatar #64500 to #64489 - maddboiy (06/12/2014) [-]
Rommel was fucking brilliant i love him
User avatar #64501 to #64500 - undeadwill (06/12/2014) [-]
A good general and man on the wrong side..
#64532 to #64501 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/13/2014) [-]
Sometimes it's best to have good people on the "wrong side." It allows them to attack the "wrong side" from within.
User avatar #64492 to #64489 - alimais (06/12/2014) [-]
Rommel and the Reichsnegercrew
User avatar #64491 to #64489 - alimais (06/12/2014) [-]
If he'd have listend to his generals then Germany would have won WWII
User avatar #64635 to #64491 - byposted (06/16/2014) [-]
If Hitler had never taken the initiative, what would there have been to win?
0
#64634 to #64491 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#64499 to #64491 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/12/2014) [-]
And if Italy hadn't screwed them over
And if Japan hadn't attacked America, and brought them into the war
0
#64503 to #64499 - alimais has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64498 to #64491 - undeadwill (06/12/2014) [-]
Well when you have one man in power with everyone kissing ass, mistakes will be made.
0
#64488 - undeadwill has deleted their comment [-]
#64484 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/12/2014) [-]
#64494 to #64484 - youregaylol (06/12/2014) [-]
The government benefits from people like you, people who are so frightened by their fellow citizen. The fact is the mass majority of people who own semi automatic rifles (scury assault rifles) never harm a fly. They're patriots looking out for you and your country.

How will the worker ever get out from under the boot of oppressive government and the rich if he is scared of his allies? Do you expect the rich to surrender their power willingly? Do you think the corporate police force will help you when SHTF? Will the military aid you when they're knee deep in a civil uprising?

No. It's going to be your fellow commoner. The patriot. If you want real change you should stop demonizing patriots and join them. While you're at it reconsider that trust you put in our nations police force. They've killed many more people than mass murderers with guns ever have.
User avatar #64536 to #64494 - feelythefeel (06/13/2014) [-]
>you [...] are so frightened by [your] fellow citizen
Says the person wanting to kill everyone he doesn't trust.
#64540 to #64536 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
An enemy combatant is not a citizen. Nice try though, you'll come up with an original argument soon.
User avatar #64543 to #64540 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
Your definition of combatant is dubious.
#64546 to #64543 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
I doubt you even know what dubious means. A combatant is an enemy. An enemy is someone who is against you. When the shills carry out the agenda of their masters, they are against the people, making them combatants. Simple.
User avatar #64548 to #64546 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
In this context, dubious means to be suspect or inaccurate. I say that because you have no idea what a combatant is.

combatant
noun
noun: combatant; plural noun: combatants
1.
a person or nation engaged in fighting during a war.
synonyms: fighter, soldier, serviceman, servicewoman, warrior, trooper More
a person engaged in conflict or competition with another.
synonyms: contender, adversary, opponent, competitor, challenger, rival More
adjective
adjective: combatant
1.
engaged in fighting during a war.
"all the combatant armies went to war with machine guns"

In other words, you're only a combatant if you're shooting people. Or at least in a conflict with them. When's the last time you were shot or even interacted with half of the people you're wanting to murder?
#64549 to #64548 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
I suppose you have trouble reading. "a person engaged in conflict or competition with another. " ,"adversary", "competitor", " challenger", "rival".

I'm not sure why I'm surprised.
User avatar #64551 to #64549 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
How are you any of those things to them, or vice versa?
#64554 to #64551 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Just going to ignore the fact that yourr "people shooting at you" definition was complete bullshit? Ok.

Anyone who harms the people is an enemy of the people. You harm the people not just through gunfire, but by degradation and parasitic behavior. I fully accept the fact that people like you don't know you're doing harm, but you're still accountable for your actions and the actions of your master.
User avatar #64555 to #64554 - feelythefeel (06/14/2014) [-]
You are literally the most condescending person I've ever had the displeasure of talking to. You're not arguing. You're just assuming superiority and pretending that anything you perceive as inferior isn't worth arguing properly. This is what I mean when I say you're a brick wall. I'm done. You've wasted enough of my time.
#64557 to #64555 - youregaylol (06/14/2014) [-]
Exactly. Once you have no other options and I've addressed any meaningful thing you've had to say, you rage quit in an attempt to act like I didn't answer your ridiculous challenges. The fact is you've been wrong about everything and you have no way to prove otherwise.

Common tactic.

Also I'll take your silence as an admission that you were wrong about that definition.
#64502 to #64494 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/12/2014) [-]
The government will go totalitarian because Billybob McCousinfucker can't carry military grade weapons in a wal-mart. Alrighty then.

I'm not for repealing the second amendment.
Open carry activists are just fucking stupid, and if more people were to open carry, there'd probably incidents of death from misunderstandings.

Arguing with Chilis employees is not a fucking revolution.
#64516 to #64502 - youregaylol (06/13/2014) [-]
You fool, the government already is totalitarian. Just because your door isn't being kicked down by Bolsheviks? You are being oppressed by the money of Rothschild, by the bought media, by the corporate mandate, the paid for governance, the degenerate society, and the anti white establishment.

The guns are meant to allow you to fight back when you're tired of being a shill.
User avatar #64507 to #64502 - aceofshadows (06/13/2014) [-]
"there'd probably"

So you are making up this scenario and haven't provided a link to an actual incident where this has happened? Ok.
#64485 to #64484 - xxxsonic fanxxx (06/12/2014) [-]
What's the difference between a good guy with a gun and a bad guy with a gun?
About two seconds.
User avatar #64483 - lulzfornigeriagirl (06/12/2014) [-]
[Full] Elliot Rodger video statements made day of shooting This is great XD
User avatar #64558 to #64483 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/14/2014) [-]
"That is a problem that I intend to rectify. *evil laugh*

Pure gold.
#64493 to #64483 - dehumanizer (06/12/2014) [-]
go back to your facebook, normalscum
 Friends (0)