Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (5): akkere, alimais, cognosceteipsum, jewishcommunazi, minibeep, anonymous(14).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#69768 - anonymous (09/23/2014) [-]
We should perform torture enhanced interrogation on captured ISIS members by mixing capsaicin crystal in vodka and pouring it on their balls.
User avatar #69767 - feelythefeel (09/23/2014) [-]
>people whining about "cultural appropriation"
>not realizing that the simple act of listing two white inventors (Thomas Edison And Nikola Tesla) could bar anyone who believes in this bullshit and isn't white from half of all household objects
User avatar #69782 to #69767 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (09/23/2014) [-]
Cultural appropriation and cross-cultural exchange are two different things, people who dislike the act of cultural appropriation and aren't complete chauvinist retards have nothing against cross-cultural exchange. Not that I think cultural appropriation is some big deal anyway.
#69762 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
Would you say it's a viable option to leave innovation in space travel up to the private sector?

Right now, I would say no.
The only real profit that space travel can turn right now is in space tourism. Which is a small niche industry. It'll be a long time before space ambitions will really be profitable.

Though I'm interested to hear what you think.
User avatar #69764 to #69762 - whatley (09/22/2014) [-]
Considering that in modern times the private sector is doing better than the public sector in regards to space travel, I would say yes. Not to say I still don't want government research, grants, and subsidies to occur, but the private sector may be the driving force in years to come.
#69763 to #69762 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
You're forgetting contracting, private companies will create technology for the sole purpose of selling or renting it to the government. This is how the military gets some of it's greatest weaponry, by holding competitions. The government puts out an ad asking for a certain product, and private tech companies will present their take on it in the hopes that the gov will do business with them, it's a very efficient system by and large.
User avatar #69748 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
What do you guys think is the biggest threat that ISIS / ISIL poses to the western world ?
#69802 to #69748 - anonymous (09/23/2014) [-]
The begging for war from the US growing the local hatred.

Same thing happened with Iraq and Hussein.
User avatar #69803 to #69802 - anonycunt (09/23/2014) [-]
Its a good think USA is going to war with ISIS. Better destroy something that is spreading faster than ebola.
User avatar #69780 to #69748 - lordketchup (09/23/2014) [-]
I'm in Sweden

Take a guess what i think about so many syrians fleeing
#69821 to #69780 - anonymous (09/23/2014) [-]
have fun being covered in syrians, katchop
User avatar #69805 to #69780 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/23/2014) [-]
I'm so, so sorry your government is so disgusting. Sweden is a horrible example of what the future may become.
User avatar #69758 to #69748 - feelythefeel (09/22/2014) [-]
I'd say it would be the radicalization of the Islamic minority. And for once we have mainstream media sensationalism to thank for something, because if there's something sensationalism is good at it's culturally isolating things.
User avatar #69757 to #69748 - alimais ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
Waves of refugees, diversion of society through imported foreign cultures, etc
#69752 to #69748 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
The only real threats that I can imagine are terror attacks and the radicalizing of Islamic minorities, turning them into homegrown terrorists.

In a conventional war they would pose no threat.
User avatar #69754 to #69752 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
Before 9/11 happened there where about 6 mosques i believe that where spreading and teaching radicalization. Do you think this is happening now in Mosques in the USA. Honestly im all for religious freedom and privacy but i think we need some security in suspicious mosques. Especially those that have members with beards and no mustaches. That is a symbol of radicalism.
#69755 to #69754 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
Ideologically I'm opposed to Islam in western countries period.
User avatar #69756 to #69755 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
sigh, i wish there was a way to stop its spreading.
#69760 to #69756 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
There is.

Enforce border security and put down troublemakers as soon as they start causing shit.
User avatar #69761 to #69760 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
the problem is we dont know the trouble makers. They live among us, as us. If that was the case 9/11 wouldnt have happened.
User avatar #69749 to #69748 - schnizel (09/22/2014) [-]
Bad videos.
User avatar #69750 to #69749 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
probably
#69743 - feelythefeel (09/22/2014) [-]
I thought it was bad when they introduced the Holocaust course.
User avatar #69771 to #69743 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/23/2014) [-]
I'm guessing gr12, also had a course like that. Called "World Issues".

SAP courses Sociology anthropology physiology is also an extremely libewal course, one project had us presenting a social justice issue and asking the class questions on what they thought. It was horrible.
User avatar #69772 to #69771 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/23/2014) [-]
FYI I didn't take World Issues
User avatar #69765 to #69743 - ablueguy (09/23/2014) [-]
Where is that course though?
User avatar #69766 to #69765 - feelythefeel (09/23/2014) [-]
BC, Canada.
#69713 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
There's an anti-abortion measure on the ballot this election; for all practical purposes, it defines life at conception.

There's a bunch of pro-life propaganda on campus today. Giant posters of aborted fetuses and everything.
MFW.
#69769 to #69713 - anonymous (09/23/2014) [-]
THERE'S A BUNCH OF FAT BEN'S POOP PROPAGANDA ON CAMPUS TODAY
#69746 to #69713 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
The truth hurts, I believe that everyone who is pro choice should be forced to view an abortion. After all, I have no problem seeing the consequences of the things I support.
User avatar #69738 to #69713 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
I don't get why people ignore the rights of the mother in favor of something that isn't even fully formed yet. Isn't her life and well-being more important in the situation? Her body, her choice is my thought.
#69744 to #69738 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
"fully formed" has no meaning, we're all constantly progressing in our life cycle.

and what about those born with with birth defects, can they be killed because they aren't "fully formed"?

or is the argument that they aren't really human because they depend on someone else? does someone stop being a human because they have to live off life support or require 24 hour care?

why is the mothers life less important than the child's life? because she has a higher level of functionality? can we kill those with mental deficiencies, are they not "human"?

is it not also the babies body we're discussing, in addition the mothers? does the child have no "right" to his/her body because they are not able to communicate?

in addition the mother, in the mass majority of cases, already had a choice when she had sex without taking all necessary precautions.

abortion is a disgusting practice, and it's only use is controlling the degenerate population.
User avatar #69747 to #69744 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
""fully formed" has no meaning, we're all constantly progressing in our life cycle.
and what about those born with with birth defects, can they be killed because they aren't "fully formed"? "

Fully formed could have meaning if you're invested in whether or not it's a human at a specific stage.
Depends on the perspective of the person arguing against abortion. Honestly, don't really care. I'm more concerned about the mother. I don't think it would be immoral to terminate a baby that would have birth defects (such as down syndrome).

"or is the argument that they aren't really human because they depend on someone else? does someone stop being a human because they have to live off life support or require 24 hour care?"

Life support isn't a human. It depends on the level of dependence. A toddler needing a human to survive is not the same as a fetus requiring a mother to exist and grow.

"why is the mothers life less important than the child's life? because she has a higher level of functionality? can we kill those with mental deficiencies, are they not "human"? "
The child cannot exist without the mother sacrificing her body, time and health. So yes, the mother is more important as it's effecting her well-being.

"is it not also the babies body we're discussing, in addition the mothers? does the child have no "right" to his/her body because they are not able to communicate? "

No, the baby does not have rights. Not if it's essentially a parasite on the mother. It's the mothers choice until the child is born.

"in addition the mother, in the mass majority of cases, already had a choice when she had sex without taking all necessary precautions."

She made a bad choice, but that doesn't mean from that point on that all choice is stripped from her. She is still a capable human being able to make choices. The fetus is not.

"abortion is a disgusting practice, and it's only use is controlling the degenerate population."
Abortion is a neutral practice.
#69753 to #69747 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
Lori and Reba Schappell - Conjoined Twins found the twins
#69751 to #69747 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
Most of your arguments are based on the premise that viability=human, which is utterly false. Consider conjoined twins, I believe in one case a pair shared 40% of their frontal lobe in addition to several other important blood vessels, meaning they couldn't be separated. Both lived normal lives, and neither had any severe mental deficiencies.

If two people can be distinct while sharing the same brain, why would an umbilical cord be any different?

You also need to freshen up on your definition of parasite. I could list them all the differences here but this page lists them all for the most part.
www.l4l.org/library/notparas.html

You see all of your premises are based in strange ideological assumptions, not science or logical morality.

That taking of innocent human life will always be disgusting.
#69745 to #69744 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
*more important than the child's life
#69740 to #69738 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
>Eight's attempt at courting a woman
0
#69739 to #69738 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #69729 to #69713 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
jesus christ that must be annoying
#69710 to #69701 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
Assuming not anarchism,
Libertarians do not argue against ALL regulation. The airbag bit is nonsense because if you wanted a car with an airbag, you shouldn't have bought one without one. If you look at car commercials, safety is a huge selling point. The private police is nonsense, libertarians do not have a problem with tax funded police. The dirt road is nonsense, roads are funded by gas taxes; if you don't drive, you don't pay the tax.
The poor working conditions is also nonsense. If you don't like your job, don't work there. The competition between employers trying to get the necessary labor they need improves working conditions more than government ever could.

A lot of that other stuff is why I think anarchists make libertarians look bad, as I said a couple posts below.
User avatar #69732 to #69710 - alimais ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
I am from progressive Europe,

what taxes do I pay when I use a electronic vehicle ?
#69737 to #69732 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
After a brief google search, it appears my comment about gas taxes is just a popular myth. Gas tax revenues do not cover the full cost.   
   
Whatever, I still believe that the benefits of streamlined trade justify the tax.
After a brief google search, it appears my comment about gas taxes is just a popular myth. Gas tax revenues do not cover the full cost.

Whatever, I still believe that the benefits of streamlined trade justify the tax.
User avatar #69929 to #69737 - undeadwill (09/25/2014) [-]
Toll roads are still more effective.
User avatar #69718 to #69710 - schnizel (09/22/2014) [-]
The lack of is does not please the average joe. They don't want oppertunity, they want safety.
User avatar #69714 to #69710 - lordketchup (09/22/2014) [-]
whole lotta assuming there
User avatar #69715 to #69714 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
There was virtually no regulation in the late 19th and early 20th century, and yet it produced the greatest improvement in the lives of ordinary people for the widest range of people that the world had ever seen. Tens of millions of immigrants came to America in that time because it was better than everywhere else.

History is on my side.
User avatar #69716 to #69715 - lordketchup (09/22/2014) [-]
The 19th centuary was a shitty time with child labour and horrible living standards.
User avatar #69731 to #69716 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
libewal or fascist?
User avatar #69734 to #69731 - lordketchup (09/22/2014) [-]
me? neither
User avatar #69735 to #69734 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
must be a commie den
User avatar #69736 to #69735 - lordketchup (09/22/2014) [-]
that ain't me
User avatar #69717 to #69716 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
Due to a lack of capital.
Every economy IN THE WORLD has to go through that stage of economic development. It was rapidly improving during that time. In places without capital accumulation that did regulate child labor, children either turned to prostitution or they starved.
User avatar #69705 to #69701 - schnizel (09/22/2014) [-]
pebar
economicfreedom
User avatar #69703 to #69701 - schnizel (09/22/2014) [-]
But, but muh free market will fix it.
User avatar #69711 to #69703 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
It actually does fix half of what was said.
#69690 - alimais ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link
>mfw Turkey mad because huge refugee wave
that's what you get for not helping Bashar al Assad and letting "rebels" train in your country.

look at this syrianassassin
User avatar #69695 to #69690 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
I am a Bashar supporter but you have to respect Turkey for its role. I mean each nation will take the side that will benefit it. 70,000 refugees are a huge responsibility but they are Kurds. They wont be as much of a problem as radical rebels.
User avatar #69733 to #69695 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
You are being too impartial. Whatever opinions you possess are overshadowed by such "respect."

Respect Israel, for they have a purpose and "history," just like any other state. Respect Turkey, because they are merely pursuing their interests.

What of the composition, or quality? Do Israel's wants coincide with prosperity for the Levant? Has Turkey's role in Syria secured a future for the country, or has it brought about deep regression?
#69704 to #69695 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
Turkey has bad history with their kurds as far as I know.

The radical rebels aren't a problem in in Turkey duo Turkey being one if not the most of the most important gateways for radicals from all over the world into Syria.
Every time some asshole from Europe leaves for Jihad he travels over Turkey.
#69691 to #69690 - syrianassassin ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
ah god

the end of times is near.

and wtf.......

#69688 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
#69759 to #69688 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
WE POOP WITH FAT BEN
User avatar #69687 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
Internet downloading: Films, Television and Music
Should it be legal or illegal?

This assumes that you do not plan to sell anything you download for financial gain.
User avatar #69712 to #69687 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
In general I think it should be illegal. Copyright is important IMO.
User avatar #69720 to #69712 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
Copyright is important, but I find that it's primarily meant to protect from plagiarization.

Shouldn't downloads be treated more closely to fair use in terms of using it as intended? It's created for the purpose to be seen and heard. The more exposure it has, the more hype it receives, the more likely people will consider buying it or seeing it in a theater.
User avatar #69722 to #69720 - pebar (09/22/2014) [-]
I would think that decision should be up to the holder of the copyright.
For example, some lesser known musicians opt to do that, others don't.
User avatar #69730 to #69722 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
Should people be punished then for downloading it anyway against the holders wishes? I think current laws need to adapt to the new ways we view entertainment.

And I'm not sure I'd agree that it's up to the holder to decide who gets to view their creations. They're in the wrong business if they create something that's meant to entertain others, and yet don't allow people to be entertained by it unless they purchase it outright.
For instance, we wouldn't punish a person for watching the new X-Men movie just because the DVD isn't owned by them, but rather their roommates. After all, they didn't personally purchase it. Technically, they are freeloading just as much as someone who downloads it online.

Controlling who gets to view it alienates a huge portion of their potential fanbase and potential buyers(mostly the poor who can't afford to take a chance on something they might not enjoy). I think that kind of outlook will hurt sales more than anything. They should have control who gets to buy or sell their creation, that's about it.

Clearly many artists, at least in the music field, are catching on to this, which is why we have so much free music on artists official channels and vevo like on youtube.
User avatar #69721 to #69720 - eight (09/22/2014) [-]
Not sure why I said plagiarization instead of plagiarism...
#69689 to #69687 - alimais ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
I only buy stuff when I think the company/artist deserves the money
0
#69686 - eight has deleted their comment [-]
#69666 - alimais ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
Does someone else here actively follow war & conflicts ? pic is a Ukrainian blown out of an APC onto a power-line, it has something morbidly artistic
User avatar #69779 to #69666 - levvy ONLINE (09/23/2014) [-]
The Ukie Conflict only.
#69680 to #69666 - youregaylol (09/22/2014) [-]
All I can think about is the corpse, how old is it?
#69682 to #69680 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
Three weeks. His crew's APC got BTFO by anti-armor fire.

Aftermath of Ambush on Ukrainian Forces: Russian Roulette (Dispatch 75)

>those comments
User avatar #69672 to #69666 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
I live in Lebanon so i pay alot of attention. ISIS are currently flowing in but the army is taking care of them.
User avatar #69692 to #69672 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
Yes i am Maronite.
User avatar #69678 to #69672 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
Are you a Maronite?
User avatar #69676 to #69672 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
How do you feel about Israel, ex-neighbor?
User avatar #69693 to #69676 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
Unlike all the other Lebanese people i like Israel. I understand what they are doing for THEIR land which was THEIRS before Islam even existed.
User avatar #69719 to #69693 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
Wow I'm suprised, props to you for not being deluded.
User avatar #69725 to #69719 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
It's deluded for a Lebanese to hold a negative opinion of the country whose existence has only inflamed civil tensions amongst Arab peoples?

Anonycunt is the deluded one. He should read about how Israel discarded its Christian servitors, like trash, after the withdrawal. What makes him so adept at understanding a Zionist's "ancient" claim to Palestine, when his people are natives to the same land? It's cuckoldry which one might expect from a dual citizen, who has spent most of his life in the United States.
User avatar #69728 to #69725 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
You know I be joking nigger. I recognize that your opinion isn't deluded, just hurt muh fealeengs
User avatar #69727 to #69725 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
And nice pic, i see a statue of him in Baalbek.
User avatar #69726 to #69725 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
I dont care about the past. I only care about ONE thing in the past, that is is JEWISH land. Muslims came and conquered it, Jews conquered it back. It is theirs. They could have stopped this but palestine chose the path of death.
0
#69724 to #69719 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#69681 to #69676 - byposted (09/22/2014) [-]
He appears to be an American residing in Beirut - an expatriate returned home, one of Lebanon's dozen tourists?

Were he to share the common mind of his countrymen, only contempt would be felt towards Israel.
User avatar #69694 to #69681 - anonycunt (09/22/2014) [-]
Im Lebanese/American . Lebanese born and raised mostly in America but i have lived 8 years in Lebanon. I reside in Northern Lebanon.
#69665 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhiwBn99P8n81Oj75Z

Was the peanut butter and the cotton really worth it white people?

Was it?
#69667 to #69665 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
also justice, nig nog thinks hes tough, talking shit with a mob beside him and then grabs a cops pepper spray, cop shoots nig, nig runs like a bitch and later dies, crowd pussies out.

You need to login to view this link
#69660 - pebar (09/21/2014) [-]
www.stltoday.com/news/gunmen-mentions-michael-brown-as-he-robs-three-couples-leaving/article_d711821e-f3a9-513b-b942-64bab194c683.html

St. Louis Metropolitan Police are investigating an armed robbery of six people who were walking from a restaurant in the 1100 block of Mississippi Avenue at 11:11 p.m. on Saturday.

Police said the three couples, all of them from 59 to 61 years old, had just left a restaurant and were walking north on the west side of Mississippi when they were approached by two men. One of the men pointed a silver gun at the group and demanded their belongings.

After the second man grabbed items from the group, the first man said, "This is for Michael Brown," according to a police account. Both men then fled on foot.
#69656 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
this fucking website is confusing at first glance.

I-I-Is this really a safe haven? I c-c-can call the mods and admins dirty dick-licking-kike-niggers and they won't be angry? I'm scared, my home has been crushed. I need somewhere to stay.
User avatar #69679 to #69656 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
Do not go to 8chan whatever you do. At first glance it seems like 4chan but you can tell by the writing and comments something is off.
There is barely any shitposting. people say "sorry", people actually use ";_;" and it's basically a cancerous shithole.
obvious troll is obvious
#69706 to #69679 - anonymous (09/22/2014) [-]
interesting point. I've been to 8chan a few times. It's not that great. Too much like reddit. Although I kinda like this site but damn it's somewhat confusing
#69670 to #69656 - byposted (09/21/2014) [-]
Lrn2exodus, /new/sman.
User avatar #69677 to #69670 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/22/2014) [-]
good parody m9
#69662 to #69656 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
go home
#69642 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
#69639 - alimais ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
This whole "Gamergate" thingy gets weirder by the minute
#69637 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
What do you think of Anarcho-Capitalism?
User avatar #69699 to #69637 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
They'll never accomplish anything just like the libertarians, but at least free-market libertarianism as an idea actually sounds sort of rational.
0
#69698 to #69637 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
#69638 to #69637 - pebar (09/21/2014) [-]
I think they make libertarians look bad.
I think they make libertarians look bad.
#69631 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
why are all these new fags here

i dont like change
#69641 to #69631 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
you're a newfag too
get in the line of the dick sucking train
#69643 to #69641 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
>implying I haven't been here for years
>implying this is my first account
>implying you're not a newfag
#69644 to #69643 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
>I-I've been here for years guys, I've just been browsing different accounts

k, lol
#69645 to #69644 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
>not knowing who I am
>being this new

pls go back to sjw land, thnx
#69646 to #69645 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
>im a celebrity here guys, haven't you seen me post all summer?

lel
User avatar #69647 to #69646 - thechurchchurch (09/21/2014) [-]
this is just one of my alts
stay new, fayg
#69649 to #69647 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
>account that's only regular'd here a few months before summer
>SEE, IM OLDFAG

maximum kek
User avatar #69650 to #69649 - thechurchchurch (09/21/2014) [-]
ah, now I see

you're just a regular here who I made butt bothered

stay mad bby
#69651 to #69650 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
your butt seems pretty
inflammated
to me

stay anal invaded babe
User avatar #69654 to #69651 - lulzfornigeriagirl (09/21/2014) [-]
please kill yourself
#69655 to #69654 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
<3u2
#69653 to #69652 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
your arse seems to be
enal'd

rekt
User avatar #69633 to #69631 - zahuizima (09/21/2014) [-]
they need our help besides some of them are from 4chan maybe we re at the edge of the uprising of funnyjunk with 8chan and mchan to take our revenge
#69635 to #69633 - youregaylol (09/21/2014) [-]
"our" implies you're not a newfag to this board
#69611 - slatersniper ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
What different views do we have here, guys?
Write or find a brief description of it, too.

"Anarchist communism (also known as anarcho-communism or libertarian communism) is a theory of anarchism which advocates the abolition of the state, private property, and capitalism in favor of common ownership of the means of production, direct democracy and a horizontal network of voluntary associations and workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"."
User avatar #69696 to #69611 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
Authoritarian Marxist, maybe Marxist-Leninist because I support Vanguard Party and might not reject Socialism in One Country. Although I don't call myself Marxist-Leninist most of the times, I'll post the description of it:

"The goal of Marxism-Leninism is the development of a state into what it considers a socialist state through the leadership of a revolutionary vanguard composed of "professional" revolutionaries, an organic part of the working class who come to socialist consciousness as a result of the dialectic of class struggle. The socialist state, which according to Marxism-Leninism represents a "dictatorship of the proletariat", is primarily or exclusively governed by the party of the revolutionary vanguard through the process of democratic centralism, which Lenin described as "diversity in discussion, unity in action". Through this policy, the communist party (or equivalent) is the supreme political institution of the state and primary force of societal organisation. Marxism-Leninism sees the presence of competition between parties, as an ineffective measure of genuine democracy and rather asserts that, in a socialist society, pluralism only measures division and dysfunction within society."

Also, I've never seen you here before. Welcome to the board, beware the natsocs and enjoy your stay.
User avatar #69723 to #69696 - slatersniper ONLINE (09/22/2014) [-]
1, I love your username
2, I respect your stance because I love Lenin and what he tried to accomplish in Russia
and 3, thank you or welcoming me
#69700 to #69696 - schnizel (09/22/2014) [-]
I got bored in the first letter.
User avatar #69628 to #69611 - schnizel (09/21/2014) [-]
Schnizyism
User avatar #69625 to #69611 - wunderlichh (09/21/2014) [-]
I guess I am in favour for the free-market democracy. True I give you that this isn't the best system due to 3 reasons: high corruption by people of the corporate / political life who have the power, the free speech will be ignored and any protest wouldn't make big policy changes, and there will be rich and poor people.

But still, we are allowed to demonstrate, to believe in what you want to believe, and to express yourself in every kind of what you believe (to a ethical limit off course).

There will be poor people yes, and that's a downside of capitalism. But at the same time, everyone gets a equal chance to work himself up to the top. Like Ron Swanson says, capitalism is gods way to determine who is smart, and who is poor.

And above all, why using a failed experiment like communism (inb4 the failing of the soviet union, china changing it's policy towards a free market, etc.) if there is already a system that isn't perfect, but it works anyway.
User avatar #69624 to #69611 - whatley (09/21/2014) [-]
Bad system. Generally, as things get further away from capitalism they become less efficient economically.
User avatar #69623 to #69611 - drastronomy ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
idontfuckingknowhowmybeliefsareclassified-ism
#69612 to #69611 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
my belief is that you are a fucking retard
User avatar #69613 to #69612 - slatersniper ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
And like I said, a brief description.
#69615 to #69613 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
You already provided a brief description on why I hold my views
User avatar #69616 to #69615 - slatersniper ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
Not seeing it.
#69617 to #69616 - anonymous (09/21/2014) [-]
that only supports my hypothesis of you being a retard
User avatar #69619 to #69617 - slatersniper ONLINE (09/21/2014) [-]
Oh, good job using a big word.
 Friends (0)