Latest users (2): akkere, pebar, anonymous(18).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#91163 - alimais (07/30/2015) [-]
What is a #Cuckservative?

What is a #Cuckservative?
User avatar #91186 to #91163 - lulzrebornoncemore (07/31/2015) [-]
lol, this is too true.

Seriously, it doesn't matter if you are left or right. Look out for your own fucking country, your own borders. If you're a conservative and care more about other places then the Mexican border on your country then you really are a cuckservative.
User avatar #91184 to #91163 - mixednuts (07/31/2015) [-]
From what I've seen "Cuckservative" is a buzzword that Reactionaries who think that they're Conservatives use to describe actual Conservatives.
#91153 - anon (07/30/2015) [-]
i found shinys youtube account
#91146 - lulzrebornoncemore (07/29/2015) [-]
She isn't some kind of progressive twat, or nig nog loving whore.

qt please come invade me
User avatar #91156 to #91146 - mixednuts (07/30/2015) [-]
Russia annexed Crimea under the guise of protecting Russians minorities.

She probably supports Putin's efforts to coerce other countries into accommodating their Russian minorities
User avatar #91179 to #91156 - lulzrebornoncemore (07/31/2015) [-]
Like I give a fuck, Eastern Europe will still be pleb one way or the other, no offense Mother Russia.
User avatar #91150 to #91146 - redandgreen (07/29/2015) [-]
#91137 - youregaylol (07/29/2015) [-]
"Lets reset!"

Only fools limit themselves to a single dimension of combat, be it physical, mental, or spiritual. Use any means at your disposal. When your enemy is on the verge of defeat, know that mercy is a gift, not a right. Those who have no honor should be treated without honor, just as those with honor should be treated as such. Do what must be done. Be first. Finish it.
#91143 to #91137 - klowserpok (07/29/2015) [-]
"...to introduce into the philosophy of war itself a principle of moderation would be an absurdity”
- Carl von Clausewitz
#91131 - feelythefeel (07/29/2015) [-]
>we might see a resurgence in colonialism in which third world nations voluntarily surrender their independence in exchange for stability
Glory glory hallelujah! The world truly belongs to whoever embraces the nationalist wave!
User avatar #91142 to #91131 - mixednuts (07/29/2015) [-]
I've seen this around before, but do you have a source?

I find it a little difficult to believe since Michael Sata was a populist social democrat.
User avatar #91140 to #91131 - thekame (07/29/2015) [-]
The entire comment is ridiculous because the Chinese have already invested more in africa then the western world ever has. With a whole lot less genocides to booth.
User avatar #91130 - drastronomy (07/29/2015) [-]
Might be more of a philosophy question than a political one, but regardless:

Is it important to have a purpose in life?
If yes, what purpose can atheists/agnostics have that has objective meaning?
If they cannot have objective meaning, does a subjective one suffice?
What if this purpose or the connotations thereof conflict with reality?

A purpose is a means to a final goal - however, should that goal be located in the real, observable universe or is it better to have a promised land to which ones access is secured by kind acts?
#91164 to #91130 - alimais (07/30/2015) [-]
Most people aren't really strictly religious anymore and don't devout their life to religion even if the papers say they are Christian.

Most people give themselves a meaning or live thriving for happiness and satisfaction.

Roughly said there are many purposes like in a ant colony, grow, reproduce, care for offspring, and the workers work so it gets better and bigger.

Everyone is only a small part but has his own important purpose.

Feelings of happiness, satisfaction, sadness etc. are side effects

User avatar #91165 to #91164 - drastronomy (07/30/2015) [-]
So most people should base their existence around petty emotions?`
What if we made a serum that, when ingested, gave you unimaginable amounts of happiness. Would life's meaning reside in a bottle of said serum? I refuse to believe that a such easily attainable goal as "happiness" is as popular as you claim. If it was, everyone would be using narcotics.

I refuse to center my life around joy, regardless whether my quality of life increases or decreases as a result. Yet, i cannot hold any religious faith, as i was never raised to adopt religion. I cannot simply start believing.

That leaves me at a dilemma. If emotions are too banal to base one's life on, which they are, yet religion is an impossibility for me to base my life on, what should my life revolve around?

As of now i have only found self-improvement to be a venue of devotion, yet i know that also is not a real purpose, as i am only exercising, thinking, reading, exercising temperance etc. because it gives me something to strive for. There is no purpose behind the purpose, so the purpose is useless.
#91166 to #91165 - alimais (07/30/2015) [-]
>What if we made a serum that, when ingested, gave you unimaginable amounts of happiness. Would life's meaning reside in a bottle of said serum? I refuse to believe that a such easily attainable goal as "happiness" is as popular as you claim. If it was, everyone would be using narcotics.
-Stoners 420

Me too body

If happiness isn't important then why not set certain achievements for your own purpose of life or revolve your life around a ideology and spread it.

Life wants to do something that's why people doing nothing die and have their purpose as compost which lays the soil for new life ,

to live is to do.
User avatar #91167 to #91166 - drastronomy (07/30/2015) [-]
Setting achievements is exactly what i have been doing, but those achievements have no purpose other than to be fulfilled. Therefore they are, from an objective point of view, worthless.
User avatar #91132 to #91130 - youregaylol (07/29/2015) [-]
ya, seems like this is belongs on religion

everyone needs purpose
User avatar #91133 to #91132 - drastronomy (07/29/2015) [-]
Why religion? It applies to ones purpose in society as well, which i think belongs in politics. Also, i want an audience that is not m'ladys or Jebus people
User avatar #91127 to #91126 - redandgreen (07/28/2015) [-]
Should a Pastor shoot a burglar?
User avatar #91144 to #91127 - schnizel (07/29/2015) [-]
Yes, anyone should shoot a "youth".
#91245 to #91144 - klowserpok (08/01/2015) [-]
They dindu nuffins tho
they was good kids
User avatar #91261 to #91245 - schnizel (08/02/2015) [-]
didn du nufin
User avatar #91129 to #91127 - drastronomy (07/29/2015) [-]
Some human life is worth more than others, and if it is due to pure chance that the shot guy was plundering a religious institution, then lady luck is a cruel mistress at times.

If one has fallen to the point that one plunders the places their countrymen hold holy, then they do not deserve the gift of being a part of that society.
User avatar #91147 to #91129 - redandgreen (07/29/2015) [-]
Shooting them is contrary to the Pastor's religion though, regardless of what you may think about it.
User avatar #91159 to #91147 - drastronomy (07/30/2015) [-]
Murder is against the pastor's religion. Self defense is not.
User avatar #91169 to #91159 - redandgreen (07/30/2015) [-]
Killing is under the New Covenant.
User avatar #91170 to #91169 - drastronomy (07/30/2015) [-]
Yet crusades are still justified.
User avatar #91172 to #91171 - drastronomy (07/30/2015) [-]
Can you link this "new covanent"? i find nothing against killing
User avatar #91173 to #91172 - redandgreen (07/30/2015) [-]
The new covenant refers to Jesus and the New Testament.

He's a Christian Pastor. You seriously can't find anything against killing in his religion?

User avatar #91206 to #91173 - drastronomy (07/31/2015) [-]
I find plenty of rules against murder, but not killing. In any case, christians do not tend to follow the rules by the book. I find it a bit hypocritical, however that is none of my buisiness. If kiling a thief who steals from a church is considered a sin, then the pastor must recompense with his god. However, in my opinion, the action was most likely(i do not know the guy, building off the assumption that he leeches off society and contributes nothing) justified.
User avatar #91235 to #91206 - redandgreen (08/01/2015) [-]
It's true that thou shalt not kill is intended to mean unjustified killing. It's not quite a prohibition only against murder as defined in modern law.
I should have explained that I meant killing of the thief in this case would have been against the Pastor's religion, in my opinion, and this is what the Pastor seemed to be trying to do.

Separate to whether the shooting was contrary to the Pastor's professed faith - I don't agree with your view on 'leeching off society'. I think that how you might define that is very much based on context - the thief wasn't seemingly threatening life and should have been reported to police and/or held at gunpoint if possible.
The reason I'm concerned about the 'leeching off society' thing is this - It's too easy to get from there to a view that poor peoples lives are intrinsically less valuable. Also, what is valuable to society can change over time, the term leech is very much open to interpretation.
User avatar #91237 to #91235 - drastronomy (08/01/2015) [-]
Holmes spotted Blue carrying a box filled with electronics taken from the church. Holmes told him to drop the box, but Blue made a quick motion toward him, prompting the pastor to fire one shot from his 9mm pistol, KHOU-TV reports.

Reread it now, and in my opinion it is thus justified.
User avatar #91236 to #91235 - drastronomy (08/01/2015) [-]
I agree, and under normal circumstances the thief should simply be punished in a prison, as usual. However, considering the cunt is thieving a fucking church, that people hold holy, (i get pissed at this despite being atheist). and also considering the pastor was standing his ground, i see nothing wrong with the situation.

Does that mean i support killing all thieves? No. Does this mean i believe everyone should be allowed to shoot thieves on sight? Under certain circumstances, of which were not clarified in the original context, although i assume the pastor felt the thief was a threat
User avatar #91238 to #91236 - redandgreen (08/01/2015) [-]
I am Catholic and it makes me angry but the fact that is a Church shouldn't make a difference.

I do agree with you, if the Pastor genuinely felt threatened then it was justified.
User avatar #91239 to #91238 - drastronomy (08/01/2015) [-]
From an objective angle, no, it should not. However, from the eyes of the members of the society, the crime is much greater than that of petty thievery. It is like the difference between pissing in the streets of some muslim town vs pissing on a mosque - one is relatively normal while the other incites mass anger
User avatar #91258 to #91239 - redandgreen (08/02/2015) [-]
Yes, I agree.
User avatar #91208 to #91206 - youregaylol (07/31/2015) [-]
hes a bit retarded, dont speak to him and maybe he'll leave again
User avatar #91210 to #91209 - youregaylol (07/31/2015) [-]
we already have lefties who aren't retarded though

really if you do a count the number of proud white brothers is pretty small compared to the rest of the regulars

this guys just dumb though
User avatar #91211 to #91210 - drastronomy (07/31/2015) [-]
You, lulz, schnitzel, and me are all authoritarians.

Redandgreen is a liberal, to a certain extent.

The rest, that i know of are either libertarians or extreme leftists

Calling someone dumb based on their political orientation gets you nowhere. A big part of any society is having diverse thoughts. The day everyone thinks the same, democracy is ruined.
User avatar #91212 to #91211 - youregaylol (07/31/2015) [-]
You're missing a few comrades, I'll update the list soon when I'm bored.

I'm not calling him dumb because he's a liberal, I'm calling him dumb because he's dumb.

Democracy is already ruined.
User avatar #91213 to #91212 - drastronomy (07/31/2015) [-]
It is, because everyone is a part of the liberal hugbox on the outernet

I have seen no proof of his lack of intelligence, only that he disagrees with me. I view that as an opportunity for discussion, because disagreement encourages discussion. I would have a hard time discussing anything with people that agree with me.
User avatar #91214 to #91213 - youregaylol (07/31/2015) [-]
The fact that he believes that the bible doesn't allow self defense should be evidence that hes slow, not even mentioning his past retardation that you apparently don't remember.

It matters little though, given enough exposure to him you'll understand what I'm saying.
User avatar #91234 to #91214 - redandgreen (08/01/2015) [-]
I didn't say self defence was not allowed by the bible. Your retardation shows in your lack of reading comprehension as well as your fascism.
User avatar #91263 to #91234 - youregaylol (08/02/2015) [-]
that is the context, it can literally mean nothing else

you are an idiot, sorry
User avatar #91317 to #91263 - redandgreen (08/02/2015) [-]
No, it isn't. Shooting someone shows intent to kill. Again, get some therapy you insane retard.
User avatar #91253 to #91234 - youregaylol (08/02/2015) [-]
>pastor uses self defense to kill a home invader
>"Shooting them is contrary to the Pastor's religion though"
>"i never say self defense wasn't allowed"

you're stupid, and you should feel stupid

User avatar #91257 to #91253 - redandgreen (08/02/2015) [-]
So, quote me out of context and carry on.

You're retarded.
#91128 to #91127 - anon (07/29/2015) [-]
Ohh great your back...
#91141 to #91128 - anon (07/29/2015) [-]
Oh no, my echo chamber is threatened.
User avatar #91149 to #91141 - redandgreen (07/29/2015) [-]
People complain about feminists and social justice but it turns out Nazis can't handle dissenting opinions either. No surprise!
User avatar #91207 to #91149 - drastronomy (07/31/2015) [-]
I may be the black sheep among the authoritarians here but i actually like having a different point of view. It fosters discussion and opens up for more views and ideological development.
#91152 to #91149 - anon (07/29/2015) [-]
do you enjoy talking to yourself
User avatar #91168 to #91152 - redandgreen (07/30/2015) [-]
I'm not
#91118 - schnizel (07/28/2015) [-]
This is a good read:
>The North Sea peoples (Atlanteans) were notable seafarers with a fleet of 1200 war ships.
>They invaded and conquered all the Greek states except Athens.
>The story of the invasion of the North Sea Peoples told Solon by the Egyptian priests states that they were repulsed from conquering Egypt by King Ramses III (1200 -1168).
>During the 'Dark Ages' after 1200 BC, there was no writing in Greece. There was only the Egyptian priests recorded history.
>The Aegean culture was destroyed and mixed with the North Sea People.
>The North Sea People broke like a hurricane on the Mediterranean Lands using their iron weapons.
>The Ancient Egyptian Inscriptions and papyrus texts (1220 BC) tell of the invasions of the North Sea People.
>The Palace-Temple of Ramses III, at Medinet Habu shows the mural reliefs.
>On the walls of the palace and the Temple of Ramses III (1200 BC) are his achievements in battle.
User avatar #91119 to #91118 - theism ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
>blogspot link
User avatar #91122 to #91119 - schnizel (07/28/2015) [-]
Also nigger you never replied.
#91120 to #91119 - schnizel (07/28/2015) [-]
>doubting me
User avatar #91121 to #91120 - theism ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
You don't?
User avatar #91123 to #91121 - schnizel (07/28/2015) [-]
Only I can doubt me, you profiligate.
User avatar #91138 to #91125 - schnizel (07/29/2015) [-]
On the next page, he gassed 60 gorriliion bazingalion jews in his oven.
#91099 - youregaylol (07/28/2015) [-]
anyone want to go crusade some muslims in the desert with me
User avatar #91117 to #91099 - alimais (07/28/2015) [-]
Only if I decide "fuck everything"
#91107 to #91099 - byposted (07/28/2015) [-]
Do you continue to fantasize about deleterious interference, in foreign affairs, even after having deferred, from the Israeli Foreign Legion?

Those men are compatriots of the multitude of Muslims, who fight, alongside the Popular Defense.

Picture: For it is quite the Holocaust in Hell.
#91106 to #91099 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #91102 to #91099 - pebar ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
if you buy me a ddm4v5
User avatar #91103 to #91102 - youregaylol (07/28/2015) [-]
would you settle for a shovel with a knife taped to it.
User avatar #91104 to #91103 - pebar ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
do I look like a $5 whore to you?
User avatar #91105 to #91104 - youregaylol (07/28/2015) [-]
ill tape a laser pointer to the knife, final offer
#91097 - klowserpok (07/28/2015) [-]
Would anyone mind explaining to me the election going on in the USA?
As far as I can tell the candidates are as follows:

Hillary Clinton
Rand Paul
Jeb Bush
Donald Trump
And quite a few others....
#91078 - anon (07/27/2015) [-]
#91086 to #91083 - anon (07/27/2015) [-]
I saw the original pic in a cringe comp and the idea came, nothin personnel kid.
#91114 to #91086 - byposted (07/28/2015) [-]
That picture predates the Germanic furry. /politics/90428#90428

If those are your captions, you were beaten to making them.

This board needs more people, than me, making OC.
#91113 to #91086 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#91076 to #91075 - klowserpok (07/27/2015) [-]
>that comments section
User avatar #91074 - jewishcommunazi (07/27/2015) [-]
Is selective breeding of pets animal abuse?
User avatar #91090 to #91074 - pebar ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
I'm leaning more towards yes
there are a lot of genetic diseases among selective breeding dogs
User avatar #91085 to #91074 - theism ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
Legally, no. Ethically I don't think it bothers them so I'd say it's fine.
User avatar #91088 to #91085 - jewishcommunazi (07/27/2015) [-]
I find it unethical. I'll just post this video because I don't feel like writing much.
The Bizarre Truth About Purebred Dogs (and Why Mutts Are Better) - Adam Ruins Everything
User avatar #91089 to #91088 - theism ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
That's an issue with execution not core concept.
User avatar #91091 to #91089 - pebar ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
if it's bad in practice then the theory is wrong
User avatar #91092 to #91091 - theism ONLINE (07/28/2015) [-]
If it's incapable of being practiced properly yes. There are ways to carry out breeding programs that don't involve inbreeding. The fact that dogs exist at all is proof that selective breeding can have good results.
#91069 - alimais (07/27/2015) [-]
Erdogan is one kind of a maniac attacking, kurds yes now they also attack the kurdish people in Syria and the PKK while everyone is in the conflict with the IS
#91066 - idindunuffin (07/27/2015) [-]
Plans to unveil satanic statue outrages Detroit's religious leaders
More like USS

seriously Americans wake the fuck up!
#91079 to #91066 - anon (07/27/2015) [-]
The statue was made in response to tax-funded unveiling of a Christian-oriented statue if I remember correctly. It was supposed to institute a catch-22; take down the public-funded Christian monument, or allow both. Ministers didn't think the statue would actually go through, so here we are.
User avatar #91080 to #91079 - akkere ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
Fuck, forgot to login.
User avatar #91072 to #91066 - pebar ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
what's the problem
User avatar #91068 to #91066 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
If people have to pay tax dollars to have someone elses religion be represented on public ground then so should every religion.
User avatar #91073 to #91068 - lulzforeverreborn (07/27/2015) [-]
Yes I see no cultural problem when this type of freedom exists!

Lately I'm starting to understand that this type of democracy just poisons culture and thus poisons the people. There is no true freedom.
#91064 - feelythefeel (07/27/2015) [-]
MFW someone makes a /pol/ cuck thread.
#91065 to #91064 - mixednuts (07/27/2015) [-]
did someone say cuck thread?
#91032 - anon (07/27/2015) [-]
 Friends (0)