Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (7): alimais, asotil, canyou, ericr, sixmillionjuice, theism, youregaylol, anonymous(25).
Anonymous comments allowed.
251 comments displayed.
#118731 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Remember that time the Clinton campaign paid people to "correct" twitter users insulting her? Remember that time Trump sued a magazine for saying he had small hands?
#118687 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Dave Rubin said something that caught me by surprise, even he said the "Straight white cis upper-class male" is the most hated person in America. When the liberal Jewish faggot admits it, you know its a problem.
#118690 to #118687 - canyou ONLINE
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Dave Rubin is a boss. He makes me rethink what it means to be a liberal.
#118691 to #118690 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Same, he identities as a "classical liberal" though. Identity politics really ruins things.
#118700 to #118691 - pebar
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
nobody's perfect
he's a leftist who just barely starting to see the light and it's fascinating
#118701 to #118700 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I agree, "classical liberal" is a good place to be. I just don't believe he is one.
#118677 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Today I learned that joshlol blocked me.

Now I just need to trigger phanact and mudkipfucker and I'll have the triumvirate.
#118704 to #118677 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
i only block people with a negative level (aka trolls) and skeletorexplains he knows why
#118705 to #118704 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I know why too, the "OC creator" debacle between raptorjesus and some other faggot

Someone should get around to deleting that shit if you dont want people to know.
#118950 to #118942 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
*raptorjesusdiedfor
#118706 to #118705 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
the funny thing is it started because he took raptorjesus's side in an argument but then ended up blocking her lol
#118707 to #118706 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I did a small interview with raptor like half a year after it happened.

He/she said he/she doesn't talk to skeletor and skeletor said their "show" fell through.

How do you know he blocker raptor? Do you know why?
#118709 to #118707 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
i cant remember why though, this was ages ago
#118708 to #118707 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
she sent me this screenshot
#118711 to #118708 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
not a block

in any case though, the whole think blew up in skeletors face. Raptor basically threw him under the bus to take some of the heat off of her.

No internet puss puss for him.

Still, in retrospect more than a year later I'd say postingloudly was just a tremendous douchebag. But so is skeletorexplains. You're a douchebag too. So is that adun whatever guy. It was a battle of dicks, but it was interesting.
#118736 to #118711 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
can I get a tldr on some good ol FJ drama
#118744 to #118736 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
no
#118745 to #118744 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
) :
#118746 to #118745 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
proditores morte
#118747 to #118746 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I looked up on google translate and it means "Traitors death". I don't get.
#118748 to #118747 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
It means "death to traitors", the translation is a bit rough to english.
#118749 to #118748 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Which traitors?
#118750 to #118749 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
You.
#118751 to #118750 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
) :
What did I do to grant this title? Changing political views, blocking people, spamming, proxy thumbing, being a cunt?
#118752 to #118751 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
That about sums it up, though really the blocking and being a cunt are the main things. Being a cunt is kind of tied with the blocking, but generally I don't mind cuntiness.

You betrayed every longtime regular, me, pebar, marinepenguin, feelythefeel, jewishcommunazi ect ect ect. Blocking regulars is and always will be shit tier.
#118753 to #118752 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
thumb.fortrump is not a regular you fucking retard. He's been here for less then a year you stupid hypocrite, you once said you needed to be 2.5 years to be a regular. Stop kissing his boots, its embarrassing.

I'll block whoever the fuck I want, its a fucking website. Being a cunt is also what defines me here, not about to stop that.
#118754 to #118753 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I also said that blocking will always be shit, if you recall we started the announcement because theism blocked a bunch of people like a faggot.

Whatever thumbfortrump is, he's handled this better than you. I don't even really know the guy, I even argued your point against him about the EU, but I never sperged out.

You're not defined by being a cunt. Being a cunt doesn't make you cool or edgy. You're just disappointing.
#118762 to #118754 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Goodnight forever sweet prince, I will remember you for what you were.

This account is now over, I have served my watch and it is now over.
#118784 to #118762 - anon
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I am as I have always been, you're the one who has changed, sadly. And I think you know that.

Whatever account you pick up after this, I hope you can go back too how you were. If you do, send me a pm.
#118761 to #118754 - joshlol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
GIF
mfw this board
#118863 to #118761 - theism ONLINE
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Fuck keemstar tho
#118861 to #118761 - youregaylol
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
mfw this board
#118759 to #118754 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
>I've become an SJW for blocking someone on a website

This kinda insult from you is not-forgivable, from anyone else it would have. I have considered you one of my most respected friends on this site, not anymore. Enjoy your block. I'm done thumbing you up when others bring you down.
#118760 to #118759 - anon
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Well it was inevitable I suppose. I did try.

Getting thumbs from safe spacers would ruin my image anyway.
#118756 to #118754 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
You know exactly why I blocked people you stupid cunt.
#118758 to #118756 - youregaylol
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I do know, it's because you're a faggot.
#118755 to #118754 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
He doesn't need to handle anything, I fucking blocked him because I didn't want to speak with him anymore. And he got butthurt enough to make a bunch of posts about it after I repeatedly asked him to stop trying to get my attention. It's that freaking simple, if I block you - I no longer want to talk to you. Same with that irish cunt.

You're asscheese from this event is disappointing. I've been blocking since day 1 and you've known that before. Let me know when the tampon is off.
#118757 to #118755 - youregaylol
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
If you have you've never brought your safespace into the board, to my knowledge anyway.

I have always been against blocking on the board. That has never changed.

I have no tolerance for SJW's, and thats basically what you've become at this point.
#118693 to #118677 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Mudkip did not block me but he did block my IP
#118695 to #118693 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
that means he blocked you
#118702 to #118695 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
nah, he can still post on my stuff and reply to me but his content doesnt show up for me
#118703 to #118702 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
why are you such a liberal faggot
#118710 to #118703 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
i looked at both sides and liberal ideas appeal to me more
also i like cock
#118712 to #118710 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Name one good liberal idea

pro tip: its impossible
#118713 to #118712 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
free speech
the right to vote
fair wages for the lower class
#118738 to #118713 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
>HE THINKS THESE ARE "LIBERAL" IDEAS
#118715 to #118713 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
liberals hate free speech
the right to vote isn't a liberal idea
liberals dont have jobs

literally impossible
#118716 to #118715 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
>YFW they literally are
name one good conservative idea
#118739 to #118716 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Pick one from the following:

Constitutionalism
Free Speech
Nuclear family
Personal responsibility above all
Border Security
Low Taxes
Minimal government interference in the markets
A strong military
No late abortions
Merit above race, no affirmative action
Death penalty for those who deserve it
Limited gun control
Using nuclear energy instead of alt-energy
Minimal immigration
Respect of private property and against eminent domain
#118725 to #118716 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Kid. I'll give you the basic concept.

Right = freedom
Left = equality

Free speech is a core value of right wing conservatism
#118729 to #118725 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
as long as it suits the bible, eh?
at least in american conservationism
For the record, i prefer the UK conservative party to Labour
#118717 to #118716 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
white people aren't the devil
#118719 to #118717 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
you cant judge liberals by tumblr users
just like i dont judge conservatives by /b/ users
#118740 to #118719 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
/b/ users tend to be reactionaries if anything, to label them conservatives makes no sense. The alt-right is very diverse.

#118724 to #118719 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
the average tumblr user is the average liberal tbh fam

in what way do you differ from a tumblr user besides (maybe) not believing in three genders.
#118723 to #118719 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
/b/ is not political in any way.
#118718 to #118717 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
didnt say they where
every race has their shitty people
nice dodging my question, btw
#118720 to #118718 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I answered your question

a conservative ideal is white people aren't the devil

the core of liberal ideology is based around the idea that white men are pale snow demons out to eat black children
#118721 to #118720 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
...no it isnt
what did i say >>#118719,
#118726 to #118721 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
It literally is tho.

Every liberal politician targets straight, white males. Everyone. Thats who they blame the worlds problems on. Not a single other group.

White men oppress the poor blacks, white men keep the poor women down, white men force their evil religion on everyone, white men cling to their guns, white men are war mongering, white men hate gay people, white men hate immigrants, ect ect ect.

They are against no other group. We are pale demonic ice lords come to rape them with our oppressive soulless straight penises.
#118727 to #118726 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
if you seriously think that im not going to even bother
have a good day
#118741 to #118727 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
/politics/118687 Here you go noobie

To say that the left is not targeting and scapegoating whites is an insult to everyone's intelligence. It's obviously a major problem, regardless of if you want to call those people "regressive" or not, they are on the left wing.
#118728 to #118727 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
point to where I'm wrong yo
#118730 to #118728 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
pro tip: dont get your politics from /b/
#118732 to #118730 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Let me ask you this then, why do white men vote against the democrats by a large margin?
#118734 to #118732 - mudkipfucker ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
because minorities tend to be poorer and democratic policies appeal to poorer people more

#118735 to #118734 - youregaylol
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
But why do white males reject them so thoroughly?

There are more poor whites than there are poor minorities, from a purely numerical perspective.

If its all about rich vs poor what policies of the democrats hurt white males enough to make them not vote dem? Surely they would benefit from the pro poor policies as well, if all the dems want are higher taxes on the 1%?

Why does a white male blue collar worker feel more inclined to be a repub than a dem?
#118696 to #118695 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Well thats 1/3
#118697 to #118696 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I wonder who the most famous right wing fjer is.

I guess you, huh?

You posted content enough to compete with mudkipfucker and joshlol, at least on the front page.
#118722 to #118697 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Probably.
Tho I'd like to have an official vote before I feel comfortable enough to put it on my resume.
#118699 to #118697 - joshlol
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
#118692 to #118677 - joshlol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Original GhostBusters Theme Song
#118681 to #118677 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
(doubt)
Joshlol doesn't block people
#118682 to #118681 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Nevermind, it was totallytito.

The quest continues.
#118683 to #118682 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Don't bring him here
#118694 to #118683 - lotengo
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
You can't summon ppl that blocked you
#118698 to #118694 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
true
#118684 to #118683 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Why does it matter, you'll just block him.
#118686 to #118684 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I hope you are serious, that's a good idea.
#118688 to #118686 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
thumbfortrump can trigger you but totallytito hasn't yet?

TT is 100x more annoying.
#118689 to #118688 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
He's a meme, its different.
#118672 - theplanetearth
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
When The Many Stop Fearing The Few
When the many stop fearing the (((few))).
#118685 to #118672 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
When the whites stop fearing the (((jew)))
#118668 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
So now that Jill (((Stein))) is doing everything she can for Sanders supporters, are we ACTUALLY going to see a 4 person race? Or is Jill going to be the strongest third party candidate over Johnson? If even 10% of Sanders supporters vote for Jill, that'll be more votes than Johnson got in 2012.
#118663 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Is he going independent?
I know he said he would not but.....


Bernie Sanders reaction after Obama endorsing Hillary Clinton
#118669 to #118663 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Doubtful, he stated that the most important thing right now is to make sure Trump is not elected president.
#118673 to #118669 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Thats a while ago. His supporters are dumb enough to phonebank him into it
#118666 to #118663 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Nah, he'll fall in line.

His supporters though? Well thats another story. For whatever reason they have alot of hatred for HRC.
#118664 to #118663 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
He said he wants to 100% prevent a Trump presidency, and even if he failed his economics class he should STILL be smart enough to know that him running means Trump wins.,
#118665 to #118664 - lotengo
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Yea but look at his face

also www.molonlabemedia.com/2016/06/07/sanders-prepares-run-independent/#

Also, I've heared that 80% of the /bern/victims will not vote for Hillary. Tho the source on tht is the young turkadurka's so its probably like 25% nationwide
#118667 to #118665 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Yeah 25% right now, but like #NeverTrump they'll fall in line by July.
#118659 - anon
Reply +4
(06/10/2016) [-]
quality posts
#118676 to #118659 - anon
Reply +4
(06/10/2016) [-]
have this
#118674 to #118659 - anon
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
Let me guess, he blocked everyone.
#118675 to #118674 - anon
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
He did, lulz is certain type of autist that only thrives in an echo chamber.
#118679 to #118675 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Why is the same anon talking to himself? Sometimes Hide All makes me wonder.
#118650 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I notice Canadians love to brag how their country is better then the USA using stats. Not according to the Human development Index, the one that pulls all that shit together.
#118658 to #118650 - anon
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Canada is perfect for you
#118656 to #118650 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Why do you hate your country and people so much?
#118680 to #118656 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I was born an American at heart.
#118670 to #118656 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
He doesn't have a country. He's at home anywhere and nowhere. He can do business in Montreal on day, New York the next, and Mexico City the day after that. (((unforgivensoul)))'s family has moved from the Soviet Union to Israel, and then to Canada. He's going to move to the US, and we're going to drive his wretched Christ Killing ass out.
#118678 to #118670 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
GIF
Implying you can stop your rulers LMAO
#118652 to #118650 - pebar
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
#118654 to #118652 - unforgivensoul
Reply -1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Totally agree.
#118649 - anon
Reply +3
(06/10/2016) [-]
#118662 to #118653 - lotengo
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
And achamalachimcham moebarak to you to. !@#$%Ramadam
#118618 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Would Russia have been better or worse without the Bolsheviks?
#118671 to #118618 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Are you joking? It would have been better.
#118661 to #118618 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
Hard to say, the Soviet Union, as bad as it was, was one of the reasons that Russia went from a largely agrarian society to an industrial powerhouse/world power in 50ish years. The implications of a weaker Russia losing ww2 could have led to a drastically different modern world.
#118657 to #118618 - figatron
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Better without a doubt. Not that it the tsars weren't shit, but no communist Russia, no Cold War, no iron curtain, no international communism, no mass communist purges, sounds like a dream. The Russian Empire in the 20th century was a backwards hellhole but communism was way worse.
#118655 to #118618 - PopcornViking
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
Depends
Without Stalin, Russia might have been defeated in WW2
Because his government was so horrible that the people were conditioned to suffer and persevere, and thats why Stalingrad never fell even after people resorted to cannibalism if they werent eating wallpaper
In my opinion, only a communist country couldve survived Barbarossa
Its funny how these things work out

Granted, thats pretty much the only positive the Bolshiviks have produced in 100 years
#118627 to #118618 - anon
Reply +1
(06/10/2016) [-]
#118620 to #118618 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Better. This isn't even a question IMO.
#118623 to #118620 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
So you support the tsars?
#118624 to #118623 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I'd support a slow transition from barbaric imperialism to soft imperialism to democracy like the rest of Europe had.
#118625 to #118624 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
What's your opinion of the French Revolution? What about the American Revolution?
#118626 to #118625 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
1) Don't have one
2) Best thing ever, 1776 will commence, fuck the redcoats
#118628 to #118626 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
If the Russian revolution had been more like the American would you have supported it?
#118629 to #118628 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Why not, yes.
#118630 to #118629 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Supposing they still pushed a socialist system, would this still be preferable to the tsars?
#118631 to #118630 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Not really.
#118632 to #118631 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Why not?
#118633 to #118632 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Because marxism is the worst form of garbage. Pretty simple stuff here. Tsardom to Marxism is a step backwards.
#118634 to #118633 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
What makes tsardom better?
#118635 to #118634 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
With all this fucking question-asking, you sound like theism

In marxism everything is at its lowest form of shit, everyone suffers. At least in Tsardom there is some privacy, some freedom, some happiness. It's basically light-marxism, also less brutal.
#118636 to #118635 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
It should be pretty fucking obvious this is theism.

Why is Marxism necessarily like this?
#118637 to #118636 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Because its intrinsically a garbage idea that goes against human nature. What's with the common-sense question, you need me to explain why communism sucks?
#118638 to #118637 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Yes you should probably try doing that.
#118639 to #118638 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
I don't think I'm going to bother to. It's pretty simple stuff to figure out on your own.
#118640 to #118639 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
In other words you don't have the requisite knowledge or rhetorical ability to make your case.
#118641 to #118640 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
This is why I keep you blocked. Go away.
#118643 to #118641 - anon
0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Or you don't like having your echo chamber disrupted and are incapable of defending your own beliefs.
#118601 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Something I don't see leftists/liberals ever focusing on is the family. It's such a huge influence on a person, and yet they never seem to address it as a solution to a problem, instead they target welfare or something involving the government. The black community for example is destroyed because of this, basically 65-70% of them are raised with single mothers, that is obviously not a good thing at all. Only the most deluded of people unequivocally believe this is ok and has no negative effects.

So much can go wrong when you have a kid being raised by shitty outside factors (Especially in a bad community) instead of a father. Yet not only do leftists not address it, they apparently actively participate in the destruction of it with this whole ridicolous "single mother pride" agenda. Let's be completely real for a second, being raised without a father figure on average is not a positive thing with some exceptions of course, inb4 some retard uses the "Not All" argument , it doesn't instill good values, morals and principles in a child. Some of us don't like to say it because it isn't PC and it can insult a lot of people, but everyone knows this is the case. Even single-parent children wish they had a father.

So what's the excuse leftists? Why not focus on personal responsibility to fix a community when this is so obviously a huge problem? Why participate in the destruction of the family and ruin the lives of children with a false sense of hope?
#118619 to #118601 - mixednuts
Reply -2
(06/10/2016) [-]
Oh look, it's this post again.

>"single mother pride" agenda
>Even single-parent children wish they had a father.
Pick one

The burden of proof is partly on you. Sure, a Democratic politician can point out that there is statistically a correlation between paternal absence and crime. And then what? Hundreds of thousands or millions of absentee black fathers (many of whom are incarcerated) rush home? Should we legally force broken families to stay together?

The fact of the matter is that this isn't something that goes ignored. It is very much addressed within the black community, particularly by the churches. But we're outsiders looking in. If by "it isn't PC" that it's incredibly arrogant and belittling to potential voters, than yes, it's very politically incorrect.

How about in the mean time, we do what we can in our lane? Such as providing young black men with quality education so that hopefully they can find a job that can support a family by the time that they're fathers? And yes, this should include encouraging some to consider trade school over college. How about we try to neutralize the other causes of criminality, such as hunger? What if schools nationwide freely provide instructions in contraception so as to decrease the rate of teen pregnancy? After all, the majority of black Americans do live in southern states where abstinence based education is likely to be stressed. What if we end the War on Drugs and allow millions of non-violent drug offenders, many of them being black men with children, to walk free or seek help for their addictions?

Also, remember when looking over these statistics that being born out of wedlock does not mean that both parents aren't present. It's an increasingly common arrangement for non-married parents to live together. Or that being raised by a single mother does not mean that there's isn't anyone to help rear a child, the absence of a father does not mean the absence of aunts, uncles, and grandparents.

In the end what the fuck is "liberals/leftists" "addressing" this supposed to do? I'm not convinced that this is anything more than a distraction from more relevant conversations.
#118646 to #118619 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
>Pick one
There literally is no contradiction there LOL. One is propaganda put towards mothers and the other is the suffering of a child.

>Should we legally force broken families to stay together?

Oh come on, you know what the answer is. I want a cultural and societal stigma of single motherhood, I want a regression in this "progression". I want it to be frowned upon. I don't want this "I am women, hear me roar" nonsense to encourage women to leave relationships at the drop of a button. I want divorce rates to go down, I want women to stop having children if they don't believe in the relationships. I want nuclear family values.

>And then what? Hundreds of thousands or millions of absentee black fathers (many of whom are incarcerated) rush home?

That would be awesome, the black culture when it comes to family is actually quite terrible, I'm sure you know. Reforming it would be wonderful.

>Such as providing young black men with quality education so that hopefully they can find a job that can support a family by the time that they're fathers?

Sure, I'm all for public education up to high school, how do you want to make it better though? Propose me an offer faggot.

>How about we try to neutralize the other causes of criminality, such as hunger?
As in free school lunches? I think that's going too far. Food stamps is a complicated story but yes it can work.

>What if schools nationwide freely provide instructions in contraception so as to decrease the rate of teen pregnancy?

I'm down for that.

>After all, the majority of black Americans do live in southern states where abstinence based education is likely to be stressed.
Not sure where you got that stat from, I'm sure a decent chunk live in the very blue like Cally, Illinious, Michigan, ect.

>What if we end the War on Drugs and allow millions of non-violent drug offenders, many of them being black men with children, to walk free or seek help for their addictions?
I'm down with decriminalizing all drugs and even selling the weeeed. I'm so progressive that I've done mushrooms 3 times and LSD once

>In the end what the fuck is "liberals/leftists" "addressing" this supposed to do?
All I'm asking for is we shit on 3rd wave feminism and end this non-sense. It's gone too far.

>I'm not convinced that this is anything more than a distraction from more relevant conversations.
You brought up great ways to help the black community, especially ending the drug war and I'll even through you one myself, ending the private prison system remember compadre I became a Bernie supporter recently . However that doesn't mean we shouldn't also address this.
#118714 to #118646 - akkere
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Are you honestly willing to overlook the fact that a parent can develop into something objectively regressive to the overall well-being of both the other parent and the children, such that separation is necessary to deter negative development, in order to preserve a romanticized ideal of every family being happy and simply turning the other cheek when things get bad?
#118742 to #118714 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
>oh great this argument again
No I'm not saying that.
#118642 to #118619 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
If anything conservatives fighting abortion contributes more to the problem than anything liberals do.
#118644 to #118642 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Abortion laws in America are incredibly lax compared to the rest of the western world already. If you haven't figured out by the 4th month that you need to abort it then that's on you. I'm not killing a viable child for it. Personal fucking responsibility called, he wants to come back into society.

I'm actually all for abortion, but the laws have actually gone TOO far in many states.
#118645 to #118644 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
"You should be forced to go through a massive amount of physical and financial stress because you had sex one time"
#118647 to #118645 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
"Murder is ok because feelings" That argument doesn't work. Also I'm ok with abortion, but there needs to be a humane limit. Read my convo with popcornscumbag for further info.

If the next reply is stupid you won't get one back.
#118648 to #118647 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
You're strawmanning pretty heavily. Usually you do that later. Address the words I actually said bud.
#118608 to #118601 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
Being raised in a single parent household is one of the few leading variables that determines if you will live in poverty or commit crimes. As the black family has been destroyed these past 50 years, you can see that as the number of double parent households decreases, levels of crime and poverty within the black communities have skyrocketed.
#118599 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
How would feminists and animal rights activists react to widespread puppy abortions?
#118602 to #118599 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
What kind of a sick fuck would abort puppies. Dogs don't want abortions.
#118604 to #118602 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Are you trying to deny female dogs the right to decide what happens to their bodies? #mysogyny
#118605 to #118604 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
It's stereotypes like these which is the reason why I would never ever call myself a liberal or allow anyone in my family too, ever.
#118606 to #118605 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
I wish I had the power to make feminists rage on twitter. Every time I try they seem indifferent. Maybe it's cause retweeting little ol' me won't get them any attention.
#118607 to #118606 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
I used to wish I could just kill those people, at one point in my life I legitimately did. I was wishing I could just slaughter people so stupid, it would make my day to just fucking hang people like that just like the SS did. It would have made my life to just live in a fascist utopia and kill retards. I changed not too long ago, I realized that kind of behavior is bad, and even though i think I'm right it doesn't mean I should have that ability or power.

...but boy I sure do sometimes still wish I had. Just mow down animals with a machine gun, I wouldn't shed a tear. I guess that's extremely psychopathic and "edgy", but its very true.
#118595 - whoozy
Reply +3
(06/09/2016) [-]
#118565 - kanadetenshi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#118561 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/06/09/hillary_clinton_sanders_brought_passion_but_hasnt_gotten_me_to_move_on_any_policies.html

I wonder if she is as confident about this as she should be. How long until the Bernie Bros jump ship on her and what % of them do you think it will be?

I'm guessing around 60% will go to her, another 20% won't vote/3rd party and another 20% will go to Trump which should guarantee him the victory.
#118621 to #118561 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/sanders-supporters-not-vote-clinton-221642

25% have said that they won't support. My guess is that a good number of those 25% would not have voted otherwise.
#118622 to #118621 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
You forget that there's also a good portion of "Bernie" supporters that are too lazy to vote, like young adults that won't have the energy to go to the polls for Hillary.
#118534 - youregaylol
Reply +13
(06/09/2016) [-]
#118566 to #118534 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Dammit i posted the same one without looking first.
#118554 to #118534 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
One of the rare moments where I actually laugh out loud.
#118543 to #118534 - PopcornViking
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
Venezuela is going to shit because of socialism

But socialism fared much better there under Chavez
Maduro is just a flat out awful leader, and nobody can or will rally behind him like they did for Chavez
#118577 to #118543 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
systems that are so vitally important should not have to rely on a handful of people
#118574 to #118543 - redandgreen
Reply -3
(06/09/2016) [-]
US intervention is almost certainly behind a lot of the problems.
#118600 to #118574 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
LOL WHAT

You are severely retarded. Stupid Irish cunt.
#118579 to #118574 - pebar
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
their hospitals don't even have basic hand soap

how is that caused by the US?
#118610 to #118579 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(06/10/2016) [-]
The US has been destabilising Venezuela for years. It's been doing this to left-leaning governments in central and south America for decades.
#118612 to #118610 - pebar
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
no hand soap
no toilet paper
no food in grocery stores so that people literally have to hunt rats to survive

even if the US blockaded the country, it would not be that bad
the problem is socialism
#118613 to #118612 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(06/10/2016) [-]
The Government there is claiming that private companies have been hoarding supplies. Given the arrests of US citizens there for conspiracy and the fact that this and worse has happened elsewhere I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.
#118614 to #118613 - pebar
Reply +3
(06/10/2016) [-]
the government there would do anything to deflect blame

I am dumbstruck anyone could be this deluded
#118615 to #118614 - redandgreen
Reply -4
(06/10/2016) [-]
That's exactly what I think about you on this issue.
#118651 to #118615 - anon
Reply +3
(06/10/2016) [-]
Wow when even pebar lets out a gasp of surprise, you know you've hit full-retard. Making excuses for Marxist dictatorships is honestly fucking shameful.
#118616 to #118615 - pebar
Reply +2
(06/10/2016) [-]
then we have nothing to discuss
#118603 to #118579 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
I love when that gif is used properly.
#118578 to #118574 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Aside from the failed coup in 2002 against Chavez
The US recently hasn't really had any influence on Venezueka
#118609 to #118578 - redandgreen
Reply -2
(06/10/2016) [-]
So, the US sponsored a coup in Venezuela which failed and you think they just decided that was it?
#118581 to #118578 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Venezuela
#118576 to #118574 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
That is bullshit and almost every Venezuelan can vow on that.
#118611 to #118576 - redandgreen
Reply -2
(06/10/2016) [-]
So, your argument is that the US just gave up on destabilising Venezuela after the failed coup attempt - unlike its actions in every other Central and South American country with a government which was left of centre? Sure.
#119110 to #118611 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(06/11/2016) [-]
Oh yeah some retarded conspiracy about a coup decades ago that has no bearing on modern politics likely destabilized Venezuela and not decades of violent dictatorship of Chavez followed up with Maduro, and totally not the dozens of examples of the party's terrible spending habits, taking over the means of production, imprisoning and executing opponents, and wasting all their resources. Obviously this evil conspiracy of America conveniently destroyed every single socialist country has also destroyed every other south american country....oh wait most of them are faring much better than Venezuela, especially capitalist Chile. Oh my!!!
#119119 to #119110 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(06/11/2016) [-]
venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1015

You mean capitalist Chile which emerged after their democratically elected government was removed through a US funded military coup - President killed and around 30000 political opponents tortured and imprisoned?

Sure, despite all the evidence of CIA involvement and the history of US involvement in the region in repeatedly destabilising governments, you go on believing the US has no involvement.
#118548 to #118543 - figatron
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Socialism was absolute shit under Chavez too. It just want total societal collapse . Just as socialism is absolute shit everywhere
#118552 to #118548 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
It was shut under Chavez
Maduro just made it that much worse
#118553 to #118552 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Shit
#118544 to #118543 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
I actually just wrote a paper on the Andean Crisis involving the stupidity between Chavez, FARC, and Uribe
#118556 to #118544 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
/politics/118426 Give me closure on this you fucking retard. I want you to either explain your position or change it since you're admitting its ok to kill babies (as long as they are inside the belly).
#118560 to #118556 - PopcornViking
Reply -2
(06/09/2016) [-]
I told you
I think last minute decisions like 3rd term abortions while well debatably to be very immoral, should still be legal
#118562 to #118560 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
The problem is, you haven't responded to my arguments in the comment, and the main problem with this is you're literally. Read carefully on this part, literally admitting that its ok to kill babies as long as they exist inside the womb. So if the baby is 8 months and 2 weeks inside the womb its ok, but as soon as he is birthed its not. There is no biological difference between the two, you're literally saying its ok to kill babies. Understand again, one baby could be 8 months old and outside the womb and you would say its not ok to kill him, but another baby 8 months inside the womb is ok to kill? This makes no sense at all. You need to reform something about this unless of course you're a troll or something
#118563 to #118562 - PopcornViking
Reply -2
(06/09/2016) [-]
You're setting a precedent that one week it's perfectly legal and ok to get an abortion but do it a week later and you're a murderer
While a fetus is still attached to the umbilical cord, I think it's under jurisdiction of the mother
#118564 to #118563 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
Dood....you literally haven't given me an argument. I just showed the blatant, obvious contradiction and hypocrisy of your view. Are you a legitimate troll or something?
#118569 to #118564 - PopcornViking
Reply -2
(06/09/2016) [-]
How is anything at all I've said hypocritical
And how have I not given you an argument
The difference to me between a baby and a fetus is that a fetus is still helpless and inside the womb, and up until its born, a woman should be able to make the decision not to have it
In my mind, you should have the entire pregnancy, but once you have the kid and after wasting 9 months of opportunity to get an abortion, then it becomes murder
#118570 to #118569 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
Literally what is the difference between a developed 8 month year old child and that same child 4 hours later after pregnancy? How is one murder and the other not?

What is the difference between child X who happened to be born during the 9th month and Child Z who was born in the 8th month and 2nd week. Why is it ok to kill Child X during the same time when Child Z would be born?



#118572 to #118570 - PopcornViking
Reply -2
(06/09/2016) [-]
Because it's still inside the mother and attached to the umbilical cord
How hard is this to grasp
I know there's not that big of a difference between the development of the two and I don't support people who get 3rd term abortions
All I'm saying is that it should be an option
Like what if some birth defect isn't caught until very late
If you want to leave it up to the abortion doctor then ok
Like for the doctor to refuse giving an abortion due to whatever reason
#118573 to #118572 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
So for both the scenarios I gave you, just because of the fact that the baby has an umbilical cord, its ok to murder it? That ONLY difference is enough for an abortion?
#118580 to #118573 - PopcornViking
Reply -2
(06/09/2016) [-]
I guess so mate
#118586 to #118580 - anon
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
cuck
#118583 to #118580 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
How is anyone supposed to take that seriously though when even you can understand how illogical that is with your "I guess so" comment?
#118536 to #118534 - anon
Reply +3
(06/09/2016) [-]
Socialism = State capitalism
That'a why national socialism falied.
#118541 to #118536 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
Yeah. It certainly wasn't British war mongering, or Americans giving supplies to Germany's enemies in flagrant disregard of international law.
#118546 to #118541 - marinepenguin
Reply +6
(06/09/2016) [-]
Somebody's buttmad that Germany lost.
#118547 to #118546 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
No. I'm upset that we treat the people who instigated another pointless European war like heroes, and that we excuse the mass murder of civilians and terror bombings, because "we wur the gud guiys."
#118596 to #118547 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
>Italy invades Ethiopia in 1935
>Japan invaded China in 1937
>Germany invaded Poland, who had a defensive alliance with Britain and France
>Britain and Neville Chamberlain were so adamantly against going to war that it took an outright invasion of an ally to finally get involved.

Germany dindu nuffin!!
#118597 to #118596 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
The German invasion of Poland was a response to the border skirmishes that were carried out by the Polish, and the fact that Poles murdered a fuckload of ethnic Germans during Bloody Sunday (Now listen here you little shit. There were a lot of Bloody Sundays. Look for the one that happened in Poland.) While Hitler may have wanted Polish territory, because it was part of what was traditionally Germany, and was inhabited by Germans he did not want any French land besides the land that was traditionally German.

Before the 1940 invasion of Paris Hitler asked Great Britain and France for peace repeatedly, and it was denied because Great Britain was using the invasion of Poland as justification for yet another European war so they could economically destroy Germany again. This is even mentioned by Winston Churchill who said that if Germany ever recovered financially that the war would have been fought in vain.

But whatever it doesn't matter. Your infantile brain can't comprehend anything outside of what you were taught in school. I bet if you believe the Iranian revolution was just a bunch of Iranians not happy with the Shah. You fucking tard.
#118598 to #118597 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(06/09/2016) [-]
I see that you prescribe to the entirely pro-Germany course of history. Where Germany had every right to invade whatever countries might have been comprised of its "traditional" lands as if that matters in terms of international law. There were tensions between Poland and Germany before Poland was invaded, but it consisted mostly of Germany asking Poland for access to what used to be Eastern Prussia. Poland refused quite obviously.

The invasion was kicked off by the Gleiwitz incident, a plot made to give Germany a "legitimate" reason for invasion. Hitler and Stalin had already planned to invade Poland long before during the formation of their non-aggression pact.

The bloody Sunday event killed some 250 Lutherans who were assumed to be Germans and 80 Catholics who were assumed to be Poles. Not to mention the event started with German snipers and ended with Germans executing several hundred Polish prisoners of war.

And the reason the allies didn't accept Hitler's original calls for peace immediately after Poland fell was because that would simply allow him to continue his plans. The allied powers for 5 years prior had given him chance after chance to cease gaining territory and he never did, the Polish invasion was what finally broke the camels back and was the point of no return. It was far beyond a simple act of spite against Germany.

And the 1953 coup to put the Shah in power was instigated by the US, the 1979 coup was not.
#118555 to #118547 - thumbfortrump
Reply +5
(06/09/2016) [-]
>that we excuse the mass murder of civilians

you seriously can't see how ironic that statement is?
#118567 to #118555 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
Again. The holocaust is a collection of myths and propaganda created after the second world war to prevent global uprisings over the nature of the second world war, and to keep Germany from recovering, and becoming an industrial world power.
#118568 to #118567 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
So nazis never killed any jews, because they were jews?
#118571 to #118568 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
There may have been isolated incidents, but there was no official military, or government program to exterminate Jews. The concentration camps scattered throughout Europe existed in the same capacity as Japanese internment camps during world war two. Since Jews lead a communist revolution towards the end of the first world war, and since those Jews were sheltered by other Jews after the revolution failed it is only rational to detain the Jewish population for the duration of a second world war. However as the Germans began to lose the war, and after the allies bombed rail lines, factories, and supply routes the camps could not be supplied.

This resulted in the Jews in the camp sharing the same fate as the Germans outside of the camps. They got sick, they didn't have clean water, they starved, and they died.
#118660 to #118571 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
**thumbfortrump used "*roll picture*"**
**thumbfortrump rolled image**

Poor jews, if only they had the nazis to protect them
#118549 to #118547 - figatron
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
When you have a regime that evil, it's worth whatever it takes to eliminate them. Bad things happen in war. It's unavoidable. It's hard to blame Britain for the war when Germany started invading all of Europe
#118550 to #118549 - theplanetearth
Reply -3
(06/09/2016) [-]
Your still buying into this bullshit aren't you? This myth of the six million who were turned into lampshade and soap? You still believe that Germany had no good reason to invade Poland even though they were murdering ethnic Germans, and the fact that Poland was unstable after the 1920 attempted communist revolution? Do you really think that after Winston Churchill admitted post war that the second world war happened because Germany was recovering from being destroyed in the first world war that the war a was justified?
#118551 to #118550 - figatron
Reply +3
(06/09/2016) [-]
Might have been justified if they had stopped after recovering what they lost. (eh not really, they did sign a treaty ceding that land) but they didn't. Nor did they have any intention to. Austria, Poland, Czech, Russia, France, the Netherlands, it was all Nazi aggression

And I won't argue the Holocaust. There's no point. It's like arguing with someone who doesn't believe in gravity because it hurts when they fall on their face.
#118533 - anon
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
When will he shut the fuck up?
#118575 to #118533 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
He won't, he's made a fortune from talking shit.
#118537 to #118533 - anon
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
Corbyn makes the right wing look like cucks.
#118532 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Hillary won't win because democrats really an Independent like me won't vote for her.
It's a douche or a turd sandwich to me. And the Turd said he'll increase my military pay, which the only good side of fighting for him.
#118542 to #118532 - pebar
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
you're voting for someone because he'll give you more money?
#118590 to #118542 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
I ain't voting at all. I'll just won't be as upset if trump wins rather than Hillary.
#118535 to #118532 - anon
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
nobody believes for a second that you're in the military, liberal faggot
#118540 to #118535 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Not Mexican and in the Navy. So suk my liberal horn
#118558 to #118540 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Why did you enlist if you don't mind me asking?
#118588 to #118558 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Ight cool.
To work, see the world, meet new people, finish my degree, and experience something greater than myself. I'll like to finish with the rank of captain at least commander.
#118591 to #118588 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
So is the Navy a career thing for you or just a once in a lifetime opportunity?
#118592 to #118591 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Career. Start while I'm younge. For the next 8 years of building my base and setting up my foundation. Do real estate for real money, and bum around Asia, humping Asians.
That's just the gist of it.
#118593 to #118592 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
I hear humping asians is easy when you're in the Navy, good luck with that.
#118594 to #118593 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
I love Asian woman. So yeah, I'ma have fun. Thanks.
#118587 to #118558 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Un block me and I'll answer
#118538 to #118535 - anon
Reply -1
(06/09/2016) [-]
More then 80% of the US military is Mexican lol
#118545 to #118538 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
That's not even remotely true
#118589 to #118545 - whitechino
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
You've seen me, I ain't latino
#118557 to #118545 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
The severely retarded browse this board, they never makes accounts though
#118617 to #118557 - anon
Reply 0
(06/10/2016) [-]
You did.
#118528 - pebar
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
a corrupt career politician will likely be governor of my state

his wife is a teacher and he's made funding education a big issue for him
he'll practically be giving himself tax dollars
#118539 to #118528 - anon
Reply +1
(06/09/2016) [-]
Who cares.
#118582 to #118559 - anon
Reply 0
(06/09/2016) [-]
Screen caping your own comments is proof your a cuck.
#118585 to #118582 - unforgivensoul
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#118584 to #118582 - unforgivensoul
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#118504 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
How many of you guys have your worn work boots on right now?
#118508 to #118504 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
I don't have a pair of work boots. I do have a pair of shoes I wear for work though.
#118509 to #118508 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
But if you don't wear your worn work boots all the time, how de we know you have a job?
#118510 to #118509 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
You don't, better wear dirty torn boots at the office from now on I guess.
#118511 to #118510 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
When I go to the Trump rallied everyone I see has their worn work boots on.
#118512 to #118511 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
I guess they are working men and women then.
#118514 to #118512 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
The only measure of the quality of a candidate is how many of their supporters are visibly manual laborers.
#118515 to #118514 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
I sense some slight irony, is this about something one of the candidates said?
#118516 to #118515 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
Nah it's some shit trumpsters on the internet are saying.
#118518 to #118516 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
Okay then. First of all, it's retarded to measure the worth of the candidate by the number of supporters who are manual laborers, especially if their candidate is not a manual laborer himself.
Every working man is a necessary cog in the wheel. The doctor could not exist without the farmer, as the farmer would not exist without the doctor.

I think, without knowing the specific quotes, that the point they're trying to get across is that more of Trump supporters are engaged in work, which I don't know is true or not.
#118519 to #118518 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
It's just another talking point, which is pretty fuckin amusing to watch.
#118521 to #118519 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
/Feel+the+bernout/funny-pictures/5941613/20#20

is this what you were referring to?
#118523 to #118521 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(06/08/2016) [-]
One example yeah.
#118513 to #118512 - theism
0
has deleted their comment [-]