Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (3): byposted, undeadwill, youregaylol, anonymous(17).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#72273 - youregaylol (11/11/2014) [-]
GRUBER: "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage." you been duped
User avatar #72267 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
I need feminism because competing on the job market with people still attached to reality is inconvenient.
#72289 to #72267 - youregaylol (11/11/2014) [-]
i need feminism because feelthefeel wont embrace my rolls in public
#72270 to #72267 - lulzformalaysiaair has deleted their comment [-]
#72243 - alimais (11/10/2014) [-]
levvy , tredbear
levvy , tredbear
User avatar #72268 to #72243 - tredbear (11/10/2014) [-]
u fokken wot m8?
#72255 to #72243 - anonymous (11/10/2014) [-]
Looks totally shopped, I blame the jews for this.
User avatar #72246 to #72243 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Looks like an ArmA 2 convoy I tried to make once, but with less ramming.

#72235 - alimais (11/10/2014) [-]
Meanwhile in Sweden
Meanwhile in Sweden
User avatar #72277 to #72235 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/11/2014) [-]
The first thing he said was "hey you" but I couldn't catch the second. He kinda mumbles it.
User avatar #72295 to #72277 - alimais (11/11/2014) [-]
"Hey you!"
"Cool turban!"
#72234 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
>All the 80 million upright Germans, each one has his decent jew. They say: all the others are swine, but here is a first-class jew.
Himmler FTW
#72236 to #72234 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Nothing was lost when he committed suicide and was sent strait to hell.

I would have loved to see the look on his face when the Soviet POW pointed him out for who he really was.
User avatar #72237 to #72236 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
>Nothing was lost when he committed suicide and was sent strait to hell.
>Soviet falsified propaganda

>I would have loved to see the look on his face when the Soviet POW pointed him out for who he really was.
A man who did nothing wrong, also, nice watch.
#72238 to #72237 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Wonder why he chose to flee Berlin if he felt he did nothing wrong...

This it the original un-altered version of the picture.

You are thinking if this one.

User avatar #72239 to #72238 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
Now he killed himself and fleed Berlin and went to hell. Good job Sasha the Mememaster .
The one with the watch is the original one.
#72240 to #72239 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
>Says the Bosnian kid who thinks he could be in the SS

If you shitskins are a members of the "Masterrace" now, then we really are all fucked.

Also "Masterrace" was nothing more then some manlet fem-boy Germans - that probably liked the big Slavic in their mouth by the end of the war.

Slavs will always rape Aryan manlet's.
#72245 to #72240 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
I see that your butt is sore.
#72247 to #72245 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Serbia should have killed more of you bitches.

Was your mother raped by a Serb and you hide the fact that you are now part of a "Lesser-Race" so you become a Nazi-apologist?

She like the taste of Slavic dick?
#72248 to #72247 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
Awww, little commie angwy?
#72249 to #72248 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
We all know what happens when Commies bully Nazis.
#72250 to #72249 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
You are truly pathetic.
User avatar #72251 to #72250 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
If I wanted my comeback I would have called your mother.
User avatar #72252 to #72251 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
Wow, you are truly great at telling jokes.
User avatar #72253 to #72252 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
When I deal with fools they are easy to tell.
User avatar #72271 to #72253 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
I didn't realize you had a shtty weaboo picture as your profile pic. Take that off man, it looks really pathetic when a commie or a nazi uses that as a profile pic because it makes them look like kids.
User avatar #72296 to #72271 - levvy (11/11/2014) [-]
Not the police of me.
User avatar #72259 to #72253 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
>calls me a fool
top fucking lel
#72260 to #72259 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Typical Nazi always implying things they know nothing about.

Let me guess, i'm a Jew too right!

You Nazis are getting you're asses kicked in Donbass by Reds.

Cry for the next 300 years for me okay?
#72261 to #72260 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
You make me laugh.
You make me laugh.
#72262 to #72261 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Nazis are funny guys too.
User avatar #72241 to #72240 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Slavic dick in their mouth*
User avatar #72242 to #72241 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
Don't brag too much about being slavic, not a lot of good things about us. You can tell by the region (eastern europe).
User avatar #72244 to #72242 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Why would I not brag about it?

Slavic people the most defiant on earth - defiant to ourselves and do others.

Are you a self-hater?
User avatar #72269 to #72244 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
Am I a self hater? Maybe... I don't know. Look at eastern europe, look at russia we are both Russian as far as I know . Is it really a great place? I hate to be shitting on your home but I mean it's had a horrible history, my Dad left and hates that country for a reason. Eastern Europe is kinda the bad half of Europe.

Convince me please that our people are great, doesn't slav mean "slave" anyhow?
#74499 to #72269 - anonymous (12/22/2014) [-]

Just like the nigger you are
User avatar #72297 to #72269 - levvy (11/11/2014) [-]
Its only "bad" because we have no order anymore. People are too busy arguing with themselves to get anything done. The Slavs today will just talk there way into the graves. Everyone blames someone else for the problems in their country (mostly Russians get them blame). But they never blame themselves - Its always The Soviet make this place shit or the Russian Czars make this place shit. Never the Polish president make this place shit or the Ukrainian president make this place shit.

The more this goes on - the more the Slavic people will fall back into the trends of the past.
User avatar #72308 to #72297 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/11/2014) [-]
Have you maybe thought there's a reason people blame Russia?
User avatar #72330 to #72308 - levvy (11/11/2014) [-]
They are forever butthurt.
User avatar #72233 - kanadetenshi (11/10/2014) [-]
Does anyone have that picture where they list the differences between classical liberal and modern liberal?
#72223 - syrianassassin (11/10/2014) [-]

this is going to be good.

this degenerate cockholster and his nuthugging fanbase of eurotrash dudebros is about to get his bones crushed.

what does FJ /pol/ think about this?
#72274 to #72223 - youregaylol (11/11/2014) [-]
you said you were just going to respond to posts

you've officially broken your word

allah will punish you
User avatar #72229 to #72223 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
Don't care really.
User avatar #72194 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
Look, I know the odds of someone finding it a nil, but what's that one Soviet patriotic song that goes "Daa daaaaaa daaa dada daaaa dada, Daa daaaaaa daaa dada daaaa dada"?
User avatar #72254 to #72194 - mrspookygunship (11/10/2014) [-]
Soviet National Anthem
User avatar #72225 to #72194 - jewishcommunazi (11/10/2014) [-]
Russian internationale?
User avatar #72195 to #72194 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
Give more detail please.
User avatar #72197 to #72195 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
In Russian.
User avatar #72201 to #72197 - akkere (11/10/2014) [-]
Well, it's a good thing we know the Soviet Song is in Russian. That definitely eliminates any possibility of it being a tribute song from Castro's hit group: The Che Guevara's.
User avatar #72196 to #72195 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
It's sung by a choir or something.
User avatar #72198 to #72196 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
No shit, give more detail. Anything you can, fast pace, slow?
User avatar #72200 to #72198 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
Rather slow, almost like a procession.
User avatar #72202 to #72200 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
Was it literally a "daaa" sound, do you remember how many of these where in the chorus?
User avatar #72203 to #72202 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
It wasn't a da sound, i just used it to represent deep sounding Russian lyrics. I don't know much about music, I don't know what the chorus was.
User avatar #72205 to #72203 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
One Hour of Music - Soviet Communist Music Try Katyusha
User avatar #72208 to #72205 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
It's the Sacred War. Thanks.
#72207 to #72205 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
All the popular songs in the Soviet Army in there, they truly are beautiful and overwhelming. They give me the spooks till this day.

Try them, it's probably in there.
User avatar #72206 to #72205 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
I know Katyusha inside and out, I already know it isn't that.
User avatar #72209 to #72206 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
I would have never guessed with "daaa daaa daaaaa" and "In Russian".
User avatar #72211 to #72210 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
:^ ) its kool mm9
User avatar #72193 - jayfizzle ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
I dislike both Democrats and Republicans, but I have a feeling that if the leaders of the republican party had their way without any objection, slavery would be legal, segregation would be in full motion, and Jesus would be the main focus of school
#72220 to #72193 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
If Jesus was the main focus of school, even if it displaced other education, this world would still be a better place. You guys have got everything upside down, and you search in vain for an answer that's been right underneath your noses all along.
User avatar #72228 to #72220 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
>This world would still be a better place

#72256 to #72228 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
Glancing at your profile, I don't trust your sense of humor.
User avatar #72222 to #72220 - jayfizzle ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
Not sure if troll, or sheltered christian teenager.
#72224 to #72222 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
Neither. And, you don't have to be sheltered to be a Christian. You can also just have more constitution than the 95% of people that are easily convinced by rhetoric.
User avatar #72264 to #72224 - jayfizzle ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
I'm going to be frank with you. Christianity is a religion from the dark ages and has no place in modern society. It was used as a way to control the people and make them fear an afterlife if they did not do what the clergymen told them to. The bible is grossly inaccurate and flawed, but that is a discussion for the religion board.
#72282 to #72264 - cabbagemayhem (11/11/2014) [-]
Christianity is a religion from long before the Dark Ages, it has just as much of a place in modern society as ever was needed. It was used as a way for tyrants to mislead and control people, just as was any other noble cause, including yours. The Bible is remarkably accurate. It was discovered to have varied less than 1% over millennia, contrasted with 30% or more from other ancient texts. You have been misinformed.

To avoid discussing religion on the politics board, don't post religious opinions on the politics board.
User avatar #72199 to #72193 - akkere (11/10/2014) [-]
By the same token, the Democrats would inverse segregation, drain economic reserves on foolhardy "save the world" escapades, and place relentless taxation on the hopes of the quelling the corporate demon without realizing they're stomping the small business guy as well. Not to mention make a number of spur-of-the-moment acts like put disqualified people in positions for the sake of race and gender.

Besides, could one really argue that the Democrats and Republicans aren't the same in internal motivations? Not necessarily in the "The Jews/Zionists run them both, goyim" sort of mindset, but that they've made certain allowances and concesisons that are rather troublingly similar. The allowance of the existence of PRISM, continued shady dealings in the Middle East, etc.

The Republicans have a great deal of fools on running their parades, certainly. But the Democrats aren't too far off from the IQ scores either. What I find more worrying, rather, is the fact that they both also have the same taste for deception of the American people, in a way that few come to observe because of these party's multiple displays of incompetence.
User avatar #72204 to #72199 - jayfizzle ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
I agree 100%.

The Repubs and Dems are financed by the most part by oil companies and its pretty obvious who they serve, and it definitely is not the American people. When it comes to foreign policy in the Middle East, both parties, despite differing opinions on what they SAY they will do, have been following identical policies. Obama campaigned on ending war in the Middle East and shutting down Guantanamo, but he has done the same thing that Bush did. Our country is in need of some major changes in how these crooks are elected and how much power they hold, but the power of corporate financing is just too strong for the average american to have any influence
User avatar #72212 to #72204 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
Rand Paul 2016, there is a bigger chance he isn't bs-ing compared to everyone else.
User avatar #72213 to #72212 - jayfizzle ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
I've been a fan of Ron Paul since Obama's reelection. The problem is nobody wants an anti Israel president. Rand Paul has been changing his policies lately to appeal to the average voter and AIPAC, who I am convinced runs the show, but I dont think it will get him too far.
User avatar #72186 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
Any society that makes it's fun acting like idiots will find itself populated by actual idiots who simply think they're in good company.

Can't remember who said that, but is relevant to more shitty boards (Like this one maybe you decide?).
User avatar #72191 to #72186 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
It's 100% relevant to /religion/. That's the shitposting ground. It drew in complete autists like syrian and dehumanizer.
#72221 to #72191 - dehumanizer (11/10/2014) [-]
&gt;says the pankake guy   
>says the pankake guy

User avatar #72293 to #72221 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/11/2014) [-]
That's a joke though, I have a line between jokes and seriousness. You just have jew pics and that is all. You just circlejerk with syrian all day with them, literally all answers to all questions you answer with that. It's almost like that's your entire life because you have nothing better to do in Barfgaria.
#72294 to #72293 - dehumanizer (11/11/2014) [-]
go get circumsized again
User avatar #72307 to #72294 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/11/2014) [-]
>not getting circumsized
#72310 to #72307 - dehumanizer (11/11/2014) [-]
>not understanding basic hygine
User avatar #72183 - Shiny ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
Why are decent political news outlets so hard to find anymore, even online?

I tried giving Reason a chance, but the smugness is thick enough to choke on, and the left-libertarian community is plagued by anti-freespeech bullies.
User avatar #72227 to #72183 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
No all are shit.
User avatar #72188 to #72183 - akkere (11/10/2014) [-]
News is pretty difficult to profit off of without already being a big hitter, and most of the big hitters have political slants built into them. Even radio, which you'd think would be the ultimate opportunity for the little guy to be the balanced Betty, has been conquered by firebrand speech artists at worst and opinionated slant men at best.
The only way to really digest news is to sit down, open up tabs for each news outlet and its respective slants, and go through what's fact and what's just "ONCE AGAIN, THE RIGHT FAILS HUMANITY" or "LIBERALS AT IT AGAIN: HOW THE LEFT IS TO BLAME FOR THIS".
User avatar #72189 to #72188 - Shiny ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
Sadly, this is where the "bullying" part comes in. Your only two options are to be willfully ignorant, or to deal with emotionally draining horseshit until you don't care anyway, because the demand for incendiary journalism makes it impossible to survive as a news outlet if you aren't flinging shit. Every week I get suckered into clicking an article that sounds like nonpartisan rationalism only to find some dickhead trying to proseltyze me, talking down to me as God is on his side and the only reason to acknowledge my existence is to become another follower.
User avatar #72184 to #72183 - pebar (11/10/2014) [-]
have you tried wall street journal?
User avatar #72187 to #72184 - Shiny ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
They and Forbes are usually at the forefront of corporate apologetics, even in left-slanted articles. Not that I blame them, they exist to make investment opportunists feel good about themselves, I'm not one to deny them their niche.

Now I'm still reading Reason comments, and I've never been this disappointed in an online community. They're exactly the same kind of intellectual bully I was trying to evade to begin with.
User avatar #72185 to #72184 - pebar (11/10/2014) [-]
NVM, it looks like more than I thought needs a subscription and its really expensive
#72275 to #72185 - youregaylol (11/11/2014) [-]
it's worth it
User avatar #72283 to #72275 - pebar (11/11/2014) [-]
I'd rather pay off my tuition
#72177 - anonymous (11/10/2014) [-]
Maybe part of the reason why we do stupid things is because someone told us we shouldn't
User avatar #72179 to #72177 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
What you don't seem to understand is that you're the only disobedient five year-old here.

Normal five year-olds, however...
#72173 - nigalthornberry (11/09/2014) [-]
Switching to Hogganomics
User avatar #72172 - pebar (11/09/2014) [-]
How Eva Moskowitz Outmuscled the Teachers Union
#72171 to #72170 - cabbagemayhem (11/09/2014) [-]
What if some people want homeopathy? Why can't we outlaw people not minding their own business?
#72174 to #72171 - anonymous (11/10/2014) [-]
Homeopathy is dangerous misinformation, and kids have died because of their stupid fucking parents buying this shit.
#72175 to #72174 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
Kids have also died because their "stupid fucking parents" sent them to a magical doctor. Not your fucking problem. Send your kids where you want, and stay out of other people's business.
User avatar #72230 to #72175 - kanadetenshi (11/10/2014) [-]
It's okay for adults to fuck themself over, but not kids. That's a violation of the non agression principle. You can't apply libertarian ideals to kids who are being forced by parents and have no idea what is going on.
#72257 to #72230 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
You can't apply authoritarian rules, either. But, children are too young to take care of themselves and make their own decisions already. Somebody has to decide, and nobody can care about them as much as their parents. That's life. If you don't like the decisions that were made for you as a child, make different decisions for your kids, but don't tell other people they have to raise their kids the way you raise yours.
User avatar #72258 to #72257 - kanadetenshi (11/10/2014) [-]
Bullshit, being a parent doesn't mean you're the best thing for the child, the child is not your property or yours to ruin. There's a reason we arrest parents who rape and molest their children. Refusing to properly take care of children is in violation of the NAP and inherently anti-libertarian.
#72279 to #72258 - cabbagemayhem (11/11/2014) [-]
Think that through. Abusive parents are a different problem. Abuse is generally physical or verbal, not elaborate future planning. Even when abusive parents send their children to school, they don't think, "How can I give him the worst education/healthcare for my money?" They think, "How can I give him the best education/healthcare for my money?" They might rape him afterwards, but banning homeopathy with won't stop that. Abusive parents are the exception anyway. The masses care about their own children more than you or any authority ever could.

You misuse the term NAP and libertarian. Libertarianism is about individual and family rights. Liberals, not libertarians, want to ban opportunities, force regulations, and sacrifice rights for the sake of the children or whatever other irrational bleeding-heart causes.

With the non-aggression principle, no matter how much you want to take away other families' options, you have no method of doing so. NAP doesn't apply to children. Children have to be led by someone, but better by their parents than some benevolent stranger. I think you're mad at your parents and wish you were raised different. You'll outgrow it and eventually be in control of your own life. If you don't like the choices they made for you, make different choices for your kids, and hope some stranger can't take that away from you.
User avatar #72298 to #72279 - kanadetenshi (11/11/2014) [-]
It's not the action that makes it violent, it's the consequence. Whether or not you hurt the child by force or you're neglecting what the child actually needs it's abusive, simple as that. If you are starving your child because you believe food is the work of the devil you're neglecting your child and abusing him, regardless of your intentions.

If you seriously think saying that abuse is a fucking bad thing is anti-libertarian then you're a goddamn idiot. Being a member of a family doesn't grand you special magical abilities to be better for a child. Preventing abusive parents from ruining the individual rights of a child is not regulation, it's goddamn common sense, in the same way that stopping criminals from doing bad things are.

Ofcourse the NAP applies to children, it applies to every individual. Children need to be led yes, but they need to be led by someone who is responsible, not someone who is mentally delusional. If you think me being against child abuse gives you a right to throw false ad hominems and assumptions about my personal life then i god to hope you'll never raise children of your own.
#72333 to #72298 - cabbagemayhem (11/11/2014) [-]
No, children don't have individual rights. They have the right not to be abused whether maliciously or neglectfully, but otherwise, they are the responsibility of their parents. Neglect is not caring enough to feed or clean your children. The choice of a doctor or a school is neither malicious nor neglectful. Not choosing any doctor or school could be neglectful, but once they walk out the door to enroll a child, that argument goes out the window.

You think the choice should lie with someone else? You think all children should be wrested from their parents and led by someone who is responsible? Well, who is responsible? You? That's the problem. A real responsible person wants to decide for his own children, and let others decide for theirs. And, parents do magically care about their children more than anyone else, because they are the only ones who will be destroyed if their children die.

Don't be mad just because I said I thought you might be a teenager angry with his parents. You only make me think that more. In fact, add that to your lack of humility and empathy for parents, and I'll put my money on you being a teenager. See, you think you know what's best for you, therefore you think you know what's best for everyone, and don't see the problem with making others live the way you want them to. All teenagers are passionate about something they are yet to fully understand. And, it can be a good thing, but I'm just saying you're wrong on this issue. It doesn't help the children, it tears away real individual rights.
#72178 to #72175 - anonymous (11/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, have you heard of black salve?
#72219 to #72178 - cabbagemayhem (11/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, and let's ban midwives while we're at it. That's a slippery slope, and you don't even know black salve is 100% bad. That's up for people to decide for themselves. A new study could show some unexpected benefit. New discoveries are usually made by accident by someone doing something stupid out of desperation. Put a fuckin' warning sticker on it, but don't tell people what they can and can't do.

That's half of what's wrong with the world. It wants to take choices away from people for their "own good", even though it doesn't affect others. People have the right to make their own bad decisions. Controlling them, even just to coddle them in a padded-room system, takes away their human element and the ability to learn how to make good decisions by themselves, not to mention all of the lost innovation.
#72164 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
&quot;Liberalism is good&quot;
"Liberalism is good"

User avatar #72231 to #72164 - kanadetenshi (11/10/2014) [-]
Classical liberalism or Keynesian Social Democracy that butchered the definition of liberalism.
User avatar #72180 to #72164 - feelythefeel (11/10/2014) [-]
anon actually using sarcasm in a way that's both correct and agreeable?

What the fuck is even happening?
#72168 to #72164 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
Because the nazifags here like schnizel and yourgaylol are actually democrat shills.
#72276 to #72168 - youregaylol (11/11/2014) [-]
haha what
#72166 to #72164 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
I expected more of a shitstorm. You've disappointed me, /politics/.
#72167 to #72166 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
well your not wrong
User avatar #72226 to #72165 - levvy (11/10/2014) [-]
User avatar #72182 to #72165 - Shiny ONLINE (11/10/2014) [-]
The poster is just trying to conflate the word "liberal" with "bad". It's Orwellian linguistics. If you want to change the status quo in any fashion, you are by definition a "progressive".
User avatar #72217 to #72182 - schnizel (11/10/2014) [-]
Well, in some way yes, but read the first part again.
#72159 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
it seems like a lot of you guys would rather Obama continue to do a pretty bad job in his presidency than him start doing a better job

you guys would prefer your own political party to step up as opposed to anyone helping the country out
#72181 to #72159 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #72163 to #72159 - levvy (11/09/2014) [-]
Link someone who said that here?
#72169 to #72163 - anonymous (11/09/2014) [-]
its implied
#72161 to #72159 - princessren (11/09/2014) [-]
I just want Republicans and Democrats to get along and compromise
I just want Republicans and Democrats to get along and compromise
User avatar #72192 to #72161 - lulzformalaysiaair (11/10/2014) [-]
>implying that isn't already happening on a large scale
User avatar #72160 to #72159 - pebar (11/09/2014) [-]
where did you get that impression?
#72158 - alimais (11/09/2014) [-]
Quality news  Ukraine reporter speaks out on shelling in Eastern Ukrain  :   
&gt;Mouse arrows moves to the close button   
&gt; Female moderator &quot;We have lost connection&quot;    

			You need to login to view this link
Quality news Ukraine reporter speaks out on shelling in Eastern Ukrain :

>Mouse arrows moves to the close button
> Female moderator "We have lost connection"

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #72162 to #72158 - levvy (11/09/2014) [-]
 Friends (0)