x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#88893 - lulzforfukushima (06/25/2015) [-]
TFW you realize Stannis really does deserve to be king

-He is the true rightful heir to the throne ever since the death of Robert Baratheon, Ned and many others agree to this
-He is a very honorable and trusting man
-He is prepared to sacrifice anything
-He is supposed to free the North from the Bolton's who used lies and deceit to take the North and promised to give it back to the Stark family

This man truly deserved, above all others to be King of Westeros, even Daenerys.
User avatar #88926 to #88893 - schnizel (06/26/2015) [-]
Stannis is truly the Mannis.
User avatar #88922 to #88893 - akkere (06/26/2015) [-]
I don't know about the "trusting" bit necessarily. He's no Lannister at least - he'll consistently respect you if you prove your weight in merit - but he's also got a strong temper and holds that "sacrifice anything" trait of his to even his very best it seems.

However, Stannis is was? definitely one of the strongest candidates for the Iron Throne, and certainly rightful simply by due of monarch law.
User avatar #88899 to #88893 - hawaiianhappysauce (06/26/2015) [-]
Danaeryus is the true heir though, even though she is a moron, she is heir to the mad king.
User avatar #88902 to #88899 - lulzforfukushima (06/26/2015) [-]
The Mad King was overthrown by the rest of the Kingdoms and Houses. Targaryans are banished from throne-hood. Not to say I don't like her but Stannis has the most reputable and current heir to the throne. Your argument is equal to saying some fagget 200 years go was usurped as King and so his great-great-great-great-great-grandchild should be King.
User avatar #88881 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
Oops, I Did it Again! (TSA Version - With Remy)
User avatar #88883 to #88881 - lulzforfukushima (06/25/2015) [-]
So how do we actually improve security at airports?
User avatar #88920 to #88883 - akkere (06/26/2015) [-]
For one thing, developing methods for finding the bombs presented in the test would likely be important. Removing the excessive hardware like the invasive X-Ray and random cavity search is also a good move to; there's no reason to have a "random" anything either - you either stick your hand up everyone's bum (pls no) or no one's bum at all.
I think the fatal flaw in airport security is assuming that sensing hidden objects ends at the baggage checkpoint. We don't quite have this technology as far as I know (not to the ideal point at least), but we should make an effort to develop a wide array of sensor technology to be placed throughout the plane, such to identify certain chemicals that a crude bomb would emit, or signals that otherwise shouldn't be apparent in the plane. Protect smarter, not harder and all that.
Also, more effective anti-hijack control. Auto-pilot jack-out measures if certain triggers are made. However, this can be very difficult to plan for because a lot of circumstances can call for what a computer might consider to be peculiar handling of the controls, like going far off-course from the planned route.

Also, in pebar's defense, we don't employ the excessive security measures in something like buses or subway stations, the latter of which is also vulnerable to terrorist attacks and can be even more severe if planning is done (inb4 added to NSA track list for this) . However, I do think we should employ moderate security methods, but not so intrusive or invasive that they interfere and render much of the process to be inefficient rather than safe.
All in all, I think the TSA's big flaws is it's based on a "Protect Harder, not Smarter", clause. They have a blog where they boast about all these illegal objects they recover, but most of these items weren't retrieved through excessive means and were simply left in carry-on bags (Crime doesn't pay... for common sense, apparently). in a lot of cases. Not a lot of security measures goes into the flight-side of the airport, where it mostly falls on the shoulders of the pilots or the air marshals.
User avatar #88898 to #88883 - kanadetenshi (06/25/2015) [-]
To keep Richard Dawkins from bringing his honey in the plane of course.
User avatar #88884 to #88883 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
why do we need security at airports?
User avatar #88888 to #88884 - schnizel (06/25/2015) [-]
Because cunts like me don't aloha snickbar
User avatar #89033 to #88888 - lulzrebornagain (06/28/2015) [-]
8
8
8
8
8
QUINTS
#88890 to #88888 - falloutsurvivor (06/25/2015) [-]
so youre one of thsoe kebabs who take to the streets in riots?
User avatar #88925 to #88890 - schnizel (06/26/2015) [-]
Aloha snickbar
User avatar #88885 to #88884 - lulzforfukushima (06/25/2015) [-]
....are you serious?
User avatar #88886 to #88885 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
if people become paranoid about terrorism, then the terrorists win
because that's the whole point of terrorism
User avatar #88887 to #88886 - lulzforfukushima (06/25/2015) [-]
Do you know what a plane is and what it can do?
User avatar #88889 to #88887 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
dey go vroom vroom fwough da air
User avatar #88891 to #88889 - lulzforfukushima (06/25/2015) [-]
Exactly. Planes hold a lot of people and they can be easily fucked over. They are a massive, metal, machine flying in the sky, they can do major damage.

No sane man should ever ask why we need security in airports, I expect more from you.
User avatar #88876 to #88875 - schnizel (06/25/2015) [-]
Islam
/thread
User avatar #88913 to #88876 - byposted (06/26/2015) [-]
You've forgotten to selectively, within some sentences, quote the Qu'ran, providing the greater passage - likely one on chronicled warfare or conduct thereof - with an interpretation, in spite of the interpretive process.

I presume that a liberal "explanation" of "extremism" is bound to avoid the point, and entice fanatical criticisms, which have none.
User avatar #88924 to #88913 - schnizel (06/26/2015) [-]
Quran: "Wage war for ebin memes DD"
0
#88912 to #88876 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#88911 to #88876 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
0
#88907 to #88876 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#88869 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
according to the supreme court, the law is now based on "do what I mean, not what I say"
#88874 to #88869 - figatron (06/25/2015) [-]
Apparently "established by the state" does not mean "established by the state"
User avatar #88858 - youregaylol (06/25/2015) [-]
funnyjunk.com/Goddamn+imgrants/funny-pictures/5592463/

i bet this will be on front page soon
User avatar #88865 to #88864 - youregaylol (06/25/2015) [-]
I wouldn't hate liberals half as much as I do if it weren't for the hypocrisy thats almost inherent in their ideology. If you're gonna be stupid be consistently stupid.

If you hate the confederate flag because it's racist don't support the american flag or any other flag belonging to a nation thats been involved in slavery.
If you hate the confederate flag because it doesn't belong on us soil because the south lost don't defend the mexican flag on us soil.
If you hate the confederate flag because it offends some people don't fly the gay pride flag in christian areas.

These are the most two faced ignorant people who have ever marched under the banner of tolerance.
User avatar #88873 to #88865 - schnizel (06/25/2015) [-]
Should we start guessing the ethnicity of the wealthiest slave owners and slave traders.
Protip:They weren't christian.
User avatar #88868 to #88865 - lulzforchernobyl (06/25/2015) [-]
The reason their ideology is so hypocritical is because its entirely based on emotion.
User avatar #88857 - lulzforchernobyl (06/25/2015) [-]
funnyjunk.com/Good+cop+good+cop+routine/movies/5592085/
Talk shit about Fox all you want, MSNBC is still worse. TYT even far worse.
#88856 - lulzforchernobyl (06/25/2015) [-]
tfw you side with NCR
#88855 - Rascal (06/25/2015) [-]
Clinton and Gore in Florida.
#88878 to #88855 - Rascal (06/25/2015) [-]
Clinton and Bush sr. are pretty good friends aswell.
User avatar #88842 - feelythefeel (06/24/2015) [-]
Brother Dean and Friends preach "You Deserve Rape" at ASU Campus >someone starts arguing for fundamentalist Christianity
>respond with cuckoldry a la "nice guys finish first" behavior
>then respond with le ebin memes
I'm not one for religious fundamentalism, but god damn is this not how you respond to it.
User avatar #88872 to #88842 - akkere (06/25/2015) [-]
If it's anything like the religious preachers I've seen in Rutgers, this probably isn't the first time they've done the sign-hold-up gig; they might even do this twice a week or even daily if they have shifts. The ones I've seen aren't as volatile as to say "YOU DESERVE TO BE RAPED", nor do they yell angrily (they figured out how portable speakers 'n' wireless microphones work to do that), so they rarely ever get a response like that or at all as far as I know.
Probably had some downtime between classes so they figured they'd make a ridicule of the whole thing for that day. It's more appropriate than what I'd expect from a more social-justice-oriented university, where you'd likely have Big Red clones in a shouting match with you-deserve-rape guys like the ones in this video... over microphone and speakers to boot.
User avatar #88845 to #88842 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
"It's called free speech you communist faggot" should be on a t-shirt.
#88838 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
>There are people who think communism would work
>There are people who believe it's our duty to save people in poor countries
>there are people who believe darwinism of any sort has no place in society (m-m-muh egalitarian utopia)
User avatar #88850 to #88838 - Shiny ONLINE (06/25/2015) [-]
If you have to mandate Darwinistic policies by force, you admit they would not happen in nature, which is paradoxical.
User avatar #88870 to #88850 - schnizel (06/25/2015) [-]
But Shity, we are a part of Nature.
User avatar #88867 to #88850 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/25/2015) [-]
The thing is, humans have distanced themselves so far from nature that such is impossible. As such, some rules of nature need to be "forced" to have a sustainable, functioning society
User avatar #88853 to #88850 - lulzforchernobyl (06/25/2015) [-]
The free market isn't forced :^ )
User avatar #88844 to #88838 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
If someone agrees with one or three, I would not mind a good kicking off the cliff like the Spartans did just to show the world how well Darwinism does work.

As for number 2, this sort of high level of "humanitarianism" is the source of progressivism in the world. There should be a moderate level, we as a society have gone past that at this point though. Fuck poor countries.
User avatar #88840 to #88838 - schnizel (06/24/2015) [-]
It has never been tried.
What are you, racist?
But muh egalitarian utopia :^{
#88825 - figatron (06/24/2015) [-]
Anyone feel like its getting harder and harder these days to discuss history objectively and honestly? I try to look at history looking at the context of the time but when the topic of the US Civil War or the World Wars or something comes up but people throw racism and nazis out there and it becomes emotional shitposting.

Maybe it's just the state of social justice these days
User avatar #88843 to #88825 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW
User avatar #88851 to #88835 - mixednuts (06/25/2015) [-]
American Exceptional bullshit being taken out of a history class? How terrible.

"There's only two paragraphs in there about George Washington ... little or nothing about Martin Luther King, a whole section on slavery and how evil we are, a whole section on Japanese internment camps and how we slaughtered millions of Japanese with our bombs. I think most people when they finish that course, they'd be ready to go sign up for ISIS ... We have got to stop this silliness crucifying ourselves." -Ben Carson

Learning about atrocities like Japanese internment will make you a terrorist!

Do you have any idea how much about shit about the Founding Fathers and the Civil Rights Movement, MLK in particular, is shoved down your throat from Elementary to High School? It's the bulk of history curricula at that point. Though not being an American, I suppose you wouldn't know that.

When you get to college, the Revolution and the Civil Rights Movement are beyond tired at that point. Especially the narrative these people probably want to push. Leaving out the fierce division and disagreement among the Founding Fathers and the question of Slavery, almost completely ignoring the assistance we got from the French. Or when it comes to the Civil Rights Era, leaving out near everything aside from Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr, while ignoring the fact that the CIA monitored Martin Luther King for his Communist sympathies.
User avatar #88921 to #88851 - lulzforfukushima (06/26/2015) [-]
>Do you have any idea how much about shit about the Founding Fathers and the Civil Rights Movement, MLK in particular, is shoved down your throat from Elementary to High School?
Well at least you didn't go to Canadian elemantry school where each history subject every year was basically bullshit native american history

>while ignoring the fact that the CIA monitored Martin Luther King for his Communist sympathies.
so? That seems rather justifiable.

btw you sound like some kind of butthurt leftist with everything else you said.
User avatar #88862 to #88851 - kanadetenshi (06/25/2015) [-]
Found the butthurt SJW.
User avatar #88846 to #88835 - newbtwo (06/24/2015) [-]
...holy shit this is depressing

and im not even american
User avatar #88828 to #88825 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
The day emotions supersede rationality is the day objectivity disappears, and i too fear this day has already passed.

One can show people statistics and evidence of many things that contradict their world-view, but they tend to be denied should the facts not agree with the individuals personal, emotionally imposed views.
User avatar #88829 to #88821 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
>the guardian
>anything but tabloid
>anything but leftie liberal sewage

stop being such a sjw schnizel
User avatar #88811 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
Sears, Amazon and Walmart will ban the Confederate flag mercandise and are hailed as progressive yet still sell merchandise of the Soviet union flag.

Because you know up to 60 million people tortured, murder, starved to death is clearly much more acceptable.
User avatar #88877 to #88811 - akkere (06/25/2015) [-]
You can also buy a Nazi-styled Swastika skin for your PS4.
www.amazon.com/258stickers%C2%AE-Playstation-Conso
Too bad I'm PC Mustard Race
User avatar #88863 to #88811 - jewishcommunazi (06/25/2015) [-]
"Muh 60 brazilians!"
User avatar #88852 to #88811 - mixednuts (06/25/2015) [-]
What state capitol was the Soviet flag flown over again?
How many domestic terrorist organizations have used the Soviet flag as their symbol?
When did anti-integration protesters carry Soviet flags with them?

The Confederate flag is more relevant and decisive to Americans, this isn't a very fair comparison. There's a reason people aren't also calling for the Rhodesian flag or former South African flag to be pulled from shelves. I also don't recall Walmart or Sears having Soviet merchandise.
User avatar #88859 to #88852 - youregaylol (06/25/2015) [-]
If the confederate flag should be removed for representing a "Racist" nation the US flag should be removed for the exact same reason, otherwise you have hypocrisy. End of.
User avatar #88882 to #88859 - mixednuts (06/25/2015) [-]
The Confederate flag represented a nation that existed for six years solely for the purpose of upholding slavery.

The American flag represents a country that currently exists and has for two hundred years, founded largely on Enlightenment-era philosophy.
User avatar #88894 to #88882 - youregaylol (06/25/2015) [-]
"solely for the purpose of upholding slavery."

User avatar #88830 to #88811 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
These organisations do so because it increases their profits, not because it is correct.
User avatar #88832 to #88830 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
It's funny isn't it. Progressives always insist the market will never listen to consumers yet they're the ones who boycott companies most often.
User avatar #88834 to #88832 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
It is ironic, i agree. Most of the progressives views do not tend to be well thought-out and tend to be based on emotion and scapegoating.
#88849 to #88834 - mixednuts (06/25/2015) [-]
>Nationalist
>Accusing other people of having opinions based on emotion.
User avatar #88866 to #88849 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/25/2015) [-]
>implying nationalism is focused on pride rather than working for the collective and improvement one self
#88812 to #88811 - Rascal (06/24/2015) [-]
Free market.
User avatar #88813 to #88812 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
It's amazing how many retards assume that being for the free market means i suddenly must support and endorse whatever a company does without boycott.

Supporting the freedom of a company to make decisions =/= supporting those decisions.
#88816 to #88813 - Rascal (06/24/2015) [-]
And I'm sure if they removed the Rainbow flag and associated merchandise you wouldn't support that decision. I bet we wouldn't expect any "lol libruls made" comments from you.
User avatar #88833 to #88816 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
I never intended to buy either the confederate flag or the rainbow flag so i couldn't care about either.
#88854 to #88833 - Rascal (06/25/2015) [-]
You obviously care enough about the confederate flag to come rushing to their aid
User avatar #88823 to #88816 - youregaylol (06/24/2015) [-]
Because thats not something liberals would support.

What the fuck is your point? Are you retarded?
User avatar #88785 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
What kind of tax system do you guys agree with?

Flat tax, regressive tax or progressive tax? inb4 Milton Friedman video by pebar ;^ )
User avatar #88831 to #88785 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
Depends on the level and application thereof.
I have a firm belief that the modern tax systems are acceptable enough, although some taxes could be regulated to accommodate certain issues the state in question faces. For example - (in Europe) - new immigrants affecting job market for youths? Impose taxes for immigrant workers, or subsidies for youth workers.
User avatar #88826 to #88785 - jewishcommunazi (06/24/2015) [-]
Progressive, but I care more about fighting tax evasion than if it's progressive or flat. A regressive tax sounds absurd though.
User avatar #88808 to #88785 - kanadetenshi (06/24/2015) [-]
Gradually abolish the income tax with the government at the rate the government is shrinking. As services fall under private hands the government has no need for massive tax funds and can likely be sustained on a local level via voluntary taxation since both income and consumption taxes are theft.
User avatar #88847 to #88808 - pebar (06/25/2015) [-]
voluntary taxation... the whole reason taxes exist is so that they aren't voluntary in order to stop the free rider problem
User avatar #88861 to #88847 - kanadetenshi (06/25/2015) [-]
Taxes don't have to be theft. Also the free rider problem assumes that there's a common resource that's freely distributed to people which in a real libertarian society (One where the government isn't actually allowed to steal your money) that's not the case since nearly everything is privatized.
User avatar #88806 to #88785 - syrianassassinsoul (06/24/2015) [-]
I would like a Tax system that help to improve the country and help the people.

build a new city, new roads, healthcare, free education, science funding etc...

Not these tax that goes for military or to the belly of kings and governments. Even the government itself must pay tax.
#88787 to #88785 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
Milton Friedman - Why Tax Reform Is Impossible Above all, I want a simple tax. No matter what you're preferences are, we don't need 100,000 pages of code. This creates problems because only large companies with teams of accountants can navigate and carve out their own privileges. Smaller companies are simply left with a significant expense and they are less able to compete with large companies. Less competition = bad.

I would like to see taxes set up in such a way that people know exactly what they are paying and not hidden behind regulation and indirect taxes like corporate taxes (you can't tax a building).
I want a tax system that isn't designed to herd people to behave a certain way like a sheep dog. By this I mean things like no separate tax rates for married vs single people.
I want property taxes entirely abolished when when land size is under a certain amount. Government has no business taxes people differently based on how they spend their money.
I want the tax on suppressors and SBRs/SBSs abolished
I want gasoline taxes to cover the full cost of road maintenance. This way people who benefit from roads are the people who pay for roads. This also solves some externality problems.

In general I don't have a problem with progressive taxes as long as the rich aren't encouraged to move their money around to unprofitable areas (like tax exempt securities) to avoid the tax rate completely.
User avatar #88788 to #88787 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
Agree with everything except "I want a tax system that isn't designed to herd people to behave a certain way like a sheep dog".
User avatar #88789 to #88788 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
I understand why you feel that way.
User avatar #88790 to #88789 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
MUH ROADS
User avatar #88791 to #88790 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
what about em?
#88784 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
2 murders in town Monday afternoon very close to where I work

Had a catering order last night (I work at Subway), turned out it was for the police who were doing the investigation.
This is like half our state's annual murder budget....

Police have already arrested a suspect

"[Police] said there was no indication the two killings were connected to a 2013 assault in which [the guy] was accused of stabbing another man when he refused to change positions during a threesome."
#88778 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/23/2015) [-]
I thought you guys were joking when you said funnyjunk is becoming a liberal shithole
#88879 to #88778 - Rascal (06/25/2015) [-]
>muh liberal suppression.

FJ is full of dicks, get used to it. Faggot.
User avatar #88827 to #88778 - jewishcommunazi (06/24/2015) [-]
The jerking off thing is just plain fucked up. Jews are white though.
User avatar #88871 to #88827 - schnizel (06/25/2015) [-]
White as in European, and they don't see themselves as Europeans. If White skin=European that means that Mongols are 100% Aryan.
User avatar #88818 to #88778 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
I disagree with the second part completely. Sephardic Jews lived with the Arabs for many years because they are found in Africa/Middle East and are thus not white they are also less smart and don't fit the Goldberg stereotype as well for living with morons for so long , Ashkenazi Jews are however. I don't understand why Jews from Europe identify differently.

User avatar #88822 to #88818 - schnizel (06/24/2015) [-]
Special snowflake status.
User avatar #88807 to #88778 - newbtwo (06/24/2015) [-]
>blatant racism still gets +500 thumbs almost every time
>liberal hate on frontpage, not a single opposing opinion
>anti sjw/feminazi circlejerk way past beating a dead horse phase

anyone who believes fj is (is, not becoming) a liberal shithole is a projecting retard with a tumblr-level victim complex
User avatar #88824 to #88807 - youregaylol (06/24/2015) [-]
nah, i was just involved in a massive librul circle jerk on the front page set off by that shitty penguin meme

we're definitely going into a liberal phase, i can see the tides

deal with it
User avatar #88841 to #88824 - newbtwo (06/24/2015) [-]
please no
User avatar #88815 to #88807 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
I had assumed you were right on the political spectrum?
User avatar #88817 to #88815 - newbtwo (06/24/2015) [-]
center, but i call out bullshit no matter its political position

especially people whining for no reason, like seriously have some spine, even if the entire site is liberal doesnt mean you should whine about it
User avatar #88809 to #88807 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
examples?
SJW shit is normal though i agree
User avatar #88810 to #88809 - newbtwo (06/24/2015) [-]
look at any top comments on race shitstorms like church shooting or dindu nuffins
User avatar #88783 to #88778 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
this has nothing to do with liberalism
User avatar #88802 to #88783 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
Looking at Jews as non white is (apparently) called racist by many liberals.
Liberalism also tends to accept sexual deviancy to a much higher degree
User avatar #88804 to #88802 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
I missed the part about it being loli
User avatar #88805 to #88804 - pebar (06/24/2015) [-]
>>#88802, I have to agree with them though; no harm no foul
The only reason real CP is banned is because the harm to children that inherently comes with making it. That does not happen with loli.
0
#88803 to #88802 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #88782 to #88778 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
You'd be surprised how few people realise that there is a difference between ethnic Jews, and people who practice Judaism. You can be one without being the other, it can be complicated.

The best way to put it is that ethnic Jews are not Caucasian. They may be light skinned, but that is not the same thing as Caucasian.
User avatar #88819 to #88782 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
>The best way to put it is that ethnic Jews are not Caucasian
False m8.

www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1CHWA_enCA598CA598&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=are%20ashkenazi%20white
www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/37821/title/Genetic-Roots-of-the-Ashkenazi-Jews/
These 2 articles pretty much explain that most European Jews actually are white because people in Southern Europe converted to Judaism and spread it throughout Europe. Also Ashkanazi Jews came from Bavaria.

www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/study-finds-no-evidence-of-khazar-origin-for-ashkenazi-jews/2014/02/23/ The khazar theory is retarded and /pol/ dogma. It is as accepted by scientists as creationism is.
User avatar #88820 to #88819 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
I already had it described to me in the thread below.
User avatar #88792 to #88782 - unforgivenfive (06/24/2015) [-]
FALSE.
If your referring to definitely Caucasian Ashkenazim the majority of researched haplotype samples have been found to have origins in the ancient Levant.
there are ethnic jews from Europe, North Africa,and south west Asia that have specific strands the only originate in the area of modern Israel.

But you are right that there is a difference between being ethnically/culturally Jewish and religiously Jewish, but the two are not mutually exclusive.
User avatar #88794 to #88792 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
So you're saying that Jews are part Caucasian?

Honestly you've lost me a little.
User avatar #88795 to #88794 - unforgivenfive (06/24/2015) [-]
because of inter-relationships and intermarriage, and conversion there are Jews of almost EVERY ethnicity, that are ethnically Jewish first.
User avatar #88796 to #88795 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
Ah okay. I understand now.
User avatar #88797 to #88796 - unforgivenfive (06/24/2015) [-]
Now just just because someone is ethnically Jewish, doesn't mean that they are "Jewish"..if that makes sense. they may have been from a secular family, or brought up in a gentile household.

that's why I said there is a distinction between religious Jews, ethnic Jews, and cultural Jews.
AND in Judaism you have a concept of righteous souls....which is when you have a gentile born with a spiritual soul..in some cases (as humans we can discern when this takes place) these souls are "Jewish". so you can have a non-Jewish Jew also.

Confused yet?
User avatar #88798 to #88797 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
Now I no longer understand.
#88799 to #88798 - unforgivenfive (06/24/2015) [-]
I will simplify

everyone who is born to a Jewish mother (whether she converted or not) or a Kohen(preistly tribe) father, HAS Jewish blood and is Ethnically Jewish. this is also complicated but discussed here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew%3F#Jewish_by_birth
Those who follow Judaism (whether they are converts or not) are Religiously Jewish.
And those who are not religious but follow many/all of the traditions out of a respect for their heritage alone are Culturally Jewish.
those who are NOT Jewish but are spiritual or religious according to their own faith/culture but tend to align themselves with the same values of the Jews (AKA a good christian or a Buddhist monk...just examples) might have a Jewish SOUL and could be considered "righteous amongst the nations"

like you said originally...it is complicated but the easiest answer is if your mom was Jewish (or her mom etc..) then you are by rabbinical law, Jewish.
if your father (or his etc..) is a karaite Jew then you a Jew in their law.

Pic. related..a VERY HOT, Very Jewish Neta-Lee Hershlag(Natalie Portman)
User avatar #88814 to #88799 - schnizel (06/24/2015) [-]
AKA
Special snowflake
User avatar #88800 to #88799 - marinepenguin (06/24/2015) [-]
Ohh okay. That makes much more sense.
User avatar #88781 to #88778 - kanadetenshi (06/23/2015) [-]
I hate people who claim being Jewish is not an ethnicity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_ethnic_divisions
User avatar #88786 to #88781 - lulzforchernobyl (06/24/2015) [-]
Yeah and to call a lot of these people nazis is incorrect.

dastronomy i spelled your name wrong on purpose fagget ,myself and klowserpok for example aren't Nazis. A few members of the board might be.
User avatar #88801 to #88786 - drastronomy ONLINE (06/24/2015) [-]
I will rip your dick off m8

Eh, that's what i get for winning this user off a faggot with no sense of username creativity in a dubs competition
#88775 - pebar (06/23/2015) [-]
Walter Williams talks about FDR, Great Depression, Obama Sometimes I wonder if I would be happier if I never learned about government and economics.
#88773 - Rascal (06/23/2015) [-]
User avatar #88780 to #88773 - kanadetenshi (06/23/2015) [-]
>Ancaps
#88774 to #88773 - pebar (06/23/2015) [-]
/politics/
User avatar #88772 - youregaylol (06/23/2015) [-]
when people complain about politics being a /pol/, right wing, nazi, rasist circlejerk just remind them that regular fj is turning into a libcuck playground, at least for maybe a month

after that we'll probably go into a not caring phase, then maybe a new sjw hate phase

thank admin for poltics
User avatar #88779 to #88772 - kanadetenshi (06/23/2015) [-]
One thing i'm grateful for Hilary is that during the 2016 elections we won't have a massive Sanders circlejerk on FJ.

Aside from that there really isn't that much of a nazi circlejerk anyway.
User avatar #88771 - schnizel (06/23/2015) [-]
You need to login to view this link
>This of all the minorities!
 Friends (0)