Latest users (1): heyhowsitgoin, anonymous(17).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#92103 - kanadetenshi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #92100 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]

>Socialists actually believe this
User avatar #92106 to #92100 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Although it is correct that they are entirely different situations, it still raises a fair point;
In a libertarian society, would not entertainers make significantly more than more useful members of a society? Especially if profit powers everything, how will science, a nonprofitable service (in most cases) advance? Via natural curiosity, as before? Authorship?

User avatar #92124 to #92106 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/19/2015) [-]
Successful people usually gain through investment and being successful within supply and demand, people love sports, tv, entertainment so logically those investing in that will get a lot of demand with money in return. But the assumption that these people don't contribute to society is false, their value and popularity boosts the economy greatly, allowing more employment, competition and like Akkere entrepreneurship.

Even Paris Hilton who mostly got it's money from her daddy has invested in perfume brands, handbags, clothing lines, watches, ect and her name alone brings in consumers. Add to that being an actress, singer and mode. Not that she's good with any of those but as long as it brings in people it will help the economy.

But going back to your question on who makes more the people with the most net worth tend to be business men and entrepreneurs of companies who have significantly advanced our society through their industries or philanthropy.
User avatar #92122 to #92106 - akkere (08/18/2015) [-]
It's more that in a libertarian society, those with an entrepreneurial mindset will succeed the most.
Hilton's wealth stems entirely from her father's; the money she cultivates on her own through products she manifests is a bare fraction of anything the Hilton hotel line makes, for one thing. So her "showmanship" isn't what put her there, but inheritance of wealth.

A better example (that would be somewhat more on-target but not necessarily correct) is the relationship between Edison and Tesla, in which Edison was able to develop an entrepreneur mindset and take advantage of other inventors' work and form products; Tesla was one such opponent of Edison, especially for the conflicting relationship of Direct Current (Edison's primary product through his company of General Electric) and Alternating Current (Tesla's innovation into energy).

As for how science can succeed a great extent, the easiest way is to understand the relationship between scientists and engineers. Scientists do field work studies to understand currently existing aspects of the world are, and their findings are utilized by Engineers to create further products to do more research. These findings can also be extrapolated to make better products and create an entrepreneurial platform and thus a more static capital to perform more research with. As the next generation comes with the desire to perform more research and create better products, it's not hard to see that science becomes a self-propelling thing, even in a system as simply profit-focused as capitalism. In fact, it's the fundamental idea that anyone with a strong knack for entrepreneurship can start right away at building their own enterprise that is why capitalism is such a popular concept, as opposed to being bogged down by lack of control of your own capital flow, or even being restricted by systems parallel to castes.
User avatar #92109 to #92106 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Science is actually pretty profitable in certain areas. Pharmaceuticals, energy, transport, defense. The science itself may not make money but the way it's applied would.
User avatar #92111 to #92109 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Yes. Some areas are profitable, of course. However, there are areas that are equally important, if not more important, that still have little to no room for profit other than sponsorship and advertisement.
To name a few:
-Astronomy, and in turn space exploration
-Deep-sea biology (although genetic engineering would rise in a libertarian society)
-Theoretical physics and all its sub-categories
-Biological indexing, data gathering and species exploration
User avatar #92112 to #92111 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Astronomy and space exploration can lead to extremely profitable ventures like colonization and asteroid mining. Deep sea biology contributes to medicine, cosmetics and what not. Theoretical physics is related to energy production and space travel. Species indexing is fairly nebulous but it's beneficial to other fields as well.
User avatar #92114 to #92112 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Colonization is not profitable, nor is asteroid mining a sure-set buisiness plan. Anyone with experience in buisiness will tell you that if high-risk, unsure reward scenarious are nearly never worth taking

Deep sea biology can contribute to medicine, but science has not given us an example thus far, and once more it is a risk vs reward type thing

Theoretical physics is just that, theoretical, and tends to have few appliances. What you are envisioning as "energy production" and such is at best a science-fiction concept, and again, risk vs reward.

Space travel is not profitable.

Species indexing is rather useful for determining biological history, and is especially useful within anthropology to learn more about where humans come from, how race started, etc. We have for example learned a lot regarding the migration of early europeans by looking at haplogroup marks. However, that is interesting and might drive musesums (which are unprofitable as they are already), but not generate a product.
User avatar #92116 to #92114 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Although the profit potential for asteroid mining is through the roof. Essentially infinite access to rare minerals. If we could find sizable quantities of rare earth minerals the potential growth for electronics is ridiculous.

"Over the past quarter-century, more than 10,000 compounds have been reported from marine-derived organisms." That includes 12 anti-cancer agents.

Stuff like the EM drive would fall under theoretical physics (it's an unproven concept currently but if it works it would be fantastic).

As Earth runs out of resources and physical space, space travel will be not only profitable but necessary.
User avatar #92118 to #92116 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Also consider the sheer cost of transporting things in space, the amount of raw materials required to do so, and the uncertainty within the entire ordeal.

Anti-cancer agents /=/ anti cancer medicines. Furthermore, marine-derived organisms tend more to be surace-animals, and not crabs and worms and such that exist near volcanicly active areas, of which many of the specimen will simply dissolve due to the low pressure when brought to the surface.

Yes, of course the em drive is an interesting concept, however it has little room for profit, and if it does, it is a very, very long term investment.

Earth will not "run out of resources", any time soon, and if they are non-renewable resources, they tend to be based on carbon lifeforms or be radioactive. We have plenty of nearly every other resource we may need, as long as we use it sustainibly and wisely. I assume that regardless, it would be far more profitable for the buisinesses to reduce production as to conserve the environment rather than going full star-trek and venturing into space. Environmentalism is not a very important subject in libertarianism anyway, i have noticed.
User avatar #92120 to #92118 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Which would make technologies mitigating those complications extremely profitable.

The earth won't run out of access to resources so much as humanity's need will outstrip the supply.
User avatar #92101 to #92100 - jewishcommunazi (08/18/2015) [-]
She does have a net worth of 100 million dollars.
#92096 - dehumanizer (08/18/2015) [-]
Bernie Sanders
User avatar #92121 to #92096 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
>Political discourse in 2015.
User avatar #92107 to #92096 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Nice meme
#92093 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
David Duke is set to speak with Alex Jones, tomorrow, in Infowars' second hour of airing.


...he [Jones] promises a fair discussion. I accept no guarantees. If it turns abusive I will let go with both barrels. Hopefully it wont go that way, but if it does, I'll be ready!
#92094 to #92093 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
One of our favorite figures is following this closely.

Today, he uploaded www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es2tkHM6hxc
#92097 to #92095 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
There is something deeper, here.
#92098 to #92097 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
Look at all those lamestream "links." TheAlexJonesChannel is right there, with them! Could he be a plant? Could this be an inside job?
#92092 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#92065 - youregaylol (08/17/2015) [-]
if you haven't had children get so mad they threaten to fight you irl you're not that good at arguing

User avatar #92108 to #92065 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
I wanted to participate in this thread
But i realized it would be useless

If you at all manage to show them that race-mixing is a retarded decision, that kills biological diversity, kills culture, develops higher chances of health risks, are iherently less attractive, etc. etc. etc....

People will still priototise muh deek above morals. That is not uncommon, unfortunately.

Same applies to climate change. Even when literally everyone knows that our consumption will in time end with a painfull fall, people still priototise their standard of living and materialist aspirations as opposed to actually trying to make a difference.
User avatar #92110 to #92108 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Source on those consequences of race mixing?
User avatar #92113 to #92110 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
Have them on a flashdrive i am currently not able to get, but i will post it tommorow when i fetch it. I will be sure to throw in a mention.

Some are more metaphysical than empirical, and i can explain these. However. I will keep it short, as there is an entire science regarding the matter of identiy:
-Being split between 2 cultures tends to be detrimental to ones sense of identiy. Thus, if culture at all becomes a part of their identity, it tends to be disjointed, or one of the cultures wil be abandoned alltogether in favour of the other.
-It kills biological diversity considering it will over time, and several instances of race mixing, turn everyone into one race (race is often distinguished based on haplogroups, if haplogroups mix, they are not often distinguishable, and the same applies to FST index, at which some point over time and race mixing, there will be nearly identical distance between the members of a population)
User avatar #92115 to #92113 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
But race and culture are not the same thing. If I, a white american male, were to have kids with a black woman from my same region and socio-economic class how would that split between two cultures? The same argument could be made for in race mixing of cultural groups (i.e english and french people having kids).

It wouldn't kill biological diversity though, or even reduce it. For one there's more diversity inside certain ethnic groups than between them. Additionally it means you're using more diverse stock, positive genes tend to be dominant, negative recessive.
User avatar #92117 to #92115 - drastronomy (08/18/2015) [-]
You are right, race and culture are not neccesarily the same thing, but are inseperably intertwined. I would argue that even african americans and white americans are radically different. A friend of mine is half african american and half white (europoor here) and he tells me that he agrees with the point i am making, that he has found himself to go through phases of overcompensation. At one point he was typical "hood rat", to then becoming a borderline european supremacist, and then going back again, and now he is rather normal.

The french and english do not have substantially different cultures, although i regret not properly defining culture as " a shared set of morals, norms, language and customs", and i would say morals do not deviate that much in europan countries. A rule of thumb is to stick to your language group, which in the case of england can be both germanic and romance languages.

On the biological diversity thing, here is where i experience many are misinformed, which i suspect also is the reason eugenics is viewed as "evil".
I have tried before, and failed to find any race with higher distance between members of the population than with other races. Refer to FST index as source for that, where the difference between european whites and sub-saharan blacks is nearly twice the difference between a bonobo and a chimpanzee. I have sources of that on the flashdrive for that too, if you need them.

The biggest misconception is that "positive genes tend to be dominant". I do not know why so many people believe that, as it is absolute bogus. In fact, many diseases, marfans syndrome to name one, are hereditary through dominant alleles.

Nature works through chance and randomness, although abiding by certain laws - that is how evolution happens. Those best fit to survive, will survive, while those unfit will die. The alignment of the alleles matters not. However, that brings me to my next point that i forgot to mention:

Races have been "created" as adaptations to harsh environments. Sub-saharan blacks have dark skin as to avoid sun-burntness, and gives higher affinity to heat and sunlight. Furthermore, they have extrusive brows that work as "shades", broad flat noses that have been observed to cool down air passing through them, and opens up for better perception of smell as well as being compact. Northern whites on the other hand, have long, thin straight noses, as that "design" allows for better breathing in cold environments.
East asian people have also evolved their "squinty eyes" as an adaptation to the snow-blindness, which was a problem during the nomadic periods on the plains in and around mongolia.
Furthermore, whites are very rarely lactose intolerant, due to the basis of milk in our food for nearly all our existance, while it is quite common among africans.
User avatar #92119 to #92117 - theism ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
I would say that's an anecdote, that most likely came down to early rearing or an individual problem. I have known plenty of people of various races that more or less culturally identical to me, although a multicultural identity isn't inherently good or bad.

I'm curious what morals Europeans have that for example Africans do not. Historically religion has been a much bigger factor than race.

Africans for example have much greater genetic difference between them inside the racial group than say Europeans and Asians have between them, as the latter two groups diverged from the same population. Although genetic difference between parents isn't really a bad thing for the offspring, and race mixing wouldn't so much destroy diversity any more than breeding would anyways.

I'm not sure whether positive or negative traits have a higher tendency to be dominant or it's the same either way.

Races were created by isolation and varying environments, behavioral adaptations like clothing and diet have made physical adaptations of that nature essentially irrelevant.
#92238 to #92119 - drastronomy (08/21/2015) [-]
You would be surprised how many face the same problem. Ethan rodgers is a more relevant example.

Europeans have christian morals, and developed by europeans. However, culture would include religion, but not exclusively. It is a complex study, which i am not going to bother delving into considering i could write a book about it.

Again, source on the african claim? Regardless, remember africa is an extremely large continent. Europe is not, and stating that asia does not hold as much racial diversity (within umbrella terms of course) is blatant nonsense. For a complete set of races, see attached.

Positive and negative traits to not favour any of them. It is random.

Also, evolution did not stop at civilization. It continued and created very important differences, for example lactose tolerance. In any case, africans living in northern europe today often struggle with the climate, and in many cases need vitamin D supplements. Even if we theoretically could overcome all the challanges, it would be still at a huge cost. The best option, for everyone, would be to keep the races un-spoiled. Man should not fight against nature, but live with it.
User avatar #92442 to #92238 - theism ONLINE (08/25/2015) [-]
It seems like that would be an external issue imposed by society and would be influenced by the level of integration either individual gone through.

And if the individual in question was from a similar value system?

I'll have to look into it further.

Then would it not be more beneficial for those immigrants to have kids with locals so those kids would be better adapted to the climate? Although technology has mitigated that consequence and few people think of minor genetic consequences when falling in love and having children.
#92069 to #92065 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
Remember when you threatened to kill users on this board beacuse they disagreed/outsmarted you?
#92070 to #92069 - youregaylol (08/17/2015) [-]

also no one has ever outsmarted me on here sorry

provide a link or continue to be a buttravaged anon pls
#92071 to #92070 - anon (08/18/2015) [-]
You made a list every month. It was high level autism.
#92078 to #92071 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
I knew that I wasn't the only one. We should pool our Anti-White Extermination Lists, together!
User avatar #92086 to #92078 - youregaylol (08/18/2015) [-]
im gonna bring mine back eventually
User avatar #92088 to #92086 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
I'll help you dox them and ruin them, just short of removing them. You're the hitman, k?
User avatar #92089 to #92088 - youregaylol (08/18/2015) [-]
nah, the board needs the shills and the mongos, it keeps things flavorful
#92090 to #92089 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #92091 to #92090 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
youregaylol, i will delete thos becuz its sensitive n shit
User avatar #92072 to #92071 - youregaylol (08/18/2015) [-]
lol now i think i know who you are

also if you think the redpill list was a fite me irl list and not a joke gas chamber list you're retarded, which is likely

sorry, like most anons you're a lying buttblasted autismo whining about how i embarrassed you, please cry about it
User avatar #92081 to #92072 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
emoticons are pretty autistic doe
User avatar #92085 to #92081 - youregaylol (08/18/2015) [-]

i find they're very useful in setting people off
#92087 to #92085 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
Yeah, they rustle jammies fairly well. You got away with mine! I guess, if pursuant to that intention, it qualifies as "ironic" use.
#92084 to #92081 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#92083 to #92081 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#92082 to #92081 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #92080 to #92055 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
Political change emerges upon the top of the sewer socialist cesspool said, like, no revolutionary ever lamo what's wrong witch u boi, posting this sanders shit
User avatar #92102 to #92080 - jewishcommunazi (08/18/2015) [-]
Posadism explained
No. Actually, it's from intelligent extraterrestrial life.
#92079 to #92055 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#92066 to #92055 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
Political power grows out of a monopoly on force and commerce.
#92054 - figatron (08/17/2015) [-]

feminism today:

If you're a 65 year old man and want to medically mutilate your dick and wear a dress that's fine and we'll call you a hero for it, but if your a normal pretty 20 year old blond girl who likes to be in a sorority with other pretty 20 year old blond girls, you're worse for women than Donald Trump.
#92056 to #92054 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
:ascism today

God bless theses fuckers are dead.
#92057 to #92056 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
User avatar #92060 to #92057 - byposted (08/17/2015) [-]
tbh ur retarded lmoa
User avatar #92061 to #92060 - byposted (08/17/2015) [-]
lamo smh
#92062 to #92061 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
Fascism = Faggism = Failism

Into the pit with you. Hail Cuckler!
#92077 to #92062 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
tbh I like Dresden pics better tbh they really capture the liberal democratic spirit of aligning with BOG (Bolshevik Occupational Government) to ravage one of the world's greatest nations for the jews loma as one other person put it, earlier, on this bore'd, "an alliance between communism and capitalism" put a downward trend to European civilization, and we will likely live to see its fate: revitalization or definite devastation. Which will it be, h'white man?
#92044 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/17/2015) [-]
I made a political reading guide for people who want to learn about certain political views. I decided on 5 per subject so that people here can add additional books.
User avatar #92136 to #92044 - mixednuts (08/19/2015) [-]
Any recommendations on Social Democracy?
User avatar #92141 to #92136 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/19/2015) [-]
Pretty much the same as progressive tier. This is primarily a US politics books list.
User avatar #92137 to #92136 - mixednuts (08/19/2015) [-]
Or does that fall under the Progressive tier?
User avatar #92050 to #92044 - klowserpok (08/17/2015) [-]
You could possibly add Monarchist tier books, like Thomas Carlyles "The Latter Day Pamphlets", Robert Filmers "Patriarcha", Frederick II "Anti-Machiavel, "Liberty or Equality" by Erik Ritter von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, and the "Analects" by Confucius.
#92058 to #92050 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
We don't read shit sorry.

Nice autism btw!
#92067 to #92064 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
>Dressing up as an autistic knight
>Thinking it will ever be relevant again

Monarchism is outdated you faggot.

Good day to you. King Cuckold!
#92068 to #92067 - klowserpok (08/17/2015) [-]
8/10 i replied
User avatar #92051 to #92050 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/17/2015) [-]
I was actually thinking about making a reactionary tier though i couldn't think of any notable works.
User avatar #92052 to #92051 - klowserpok (08/17/2015) [-]
Well, if you're actually going to do a Reactionary one, theres also Guillaume Fayes "Archeofuturism", Pierre Krebs "Fighting for Essence", and maybe Ragnar Redbeards "Might is Right".
User avatar #92045 to #92044 - drastronomy (08/17/2015) [-]
That was a shit white-nationalist list. Reeks of le stormfag memes

Do not know any specifics as i do not strongly identify as a "white nationalist" despite being white, and being a nationalist.

However, it is still really apparent this was made with heavy bias.
User avatar #92046 to #92045 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/17/2015) [-]
White Nationalism is very different from conventional nationalism. In fact i just used white nationalism as a nicer substitute of white supremacy and neo-nazism. Not my fault that there apparently are no good white nationalist books.

If you want a list of more moderate nationalists like Pat Buchanan feel free to make suggestions.
User avatar #92075 to #92046 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
>there apparently are no good white nationalist books

There are none that you know of beside Duke's and Taylor's , because while you correctly recognize that White Nationalism is unique, you do not understand its unique underpinnings. Few do, so I'm not insulting you. Even less profess them!

To begin, the movement is distinctly domestic to the United States, which is why European regionals, like dratronomy, often fail to identify with its pan-racial paradigm. That's fine there being brotherhood in common cause, or fellowship , but signifies that there is more to its ideological current as opposed to actual manifestation than an amorphous "neo-nazism," if only because - not to touch the adjoining, Jewish Question - American thought has a tradition in liberal economics.

A complete, White Nationalist reading would hinge upon the works of two (late) American intellectuals, who became disillusioned with contemporary conservatism - a term they perceived, etymologically, as antiquated, because, it was, really, in political action, a confused reaction to declining White hegemony, or supremacy, over a White nation, where Whites, naturally, should assert their sole right to reign - and, accordingly, evolved into racial nationalists - who are, necessarily, separatists, in a lost land, of many alien nations, or peoples, or races, as America was foreseen.

This background should show that, in addition to "neo-nazism," it is, also, incorrect, especially after the ascendancy of Barack Obama, to take White Nationalism, synonymously, with supremacy. That ignores the defeatism inherent in the racially-conscious inheritors of the apathetic "revolution" of Reagan, and his White electors.

I'm probably talking to an empty theater, or one seeking tl;dr, but it's imperative that WNs grasp the utility of Trump, who has been described as the "next Reagan," which I mean to expand upon in another post.
User avatar #92099 to #92075 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/18/2015) [-]
Fascinating, i never knew about the US history of white nationalism since i'm European but i'm interested in said intellectuals.
User avatar #92076 to #92075 - byposted (08/18/2015) [-]
>as America was foreseen.

Of course, the trend was already observable.
User avatar #92047 to #92046 - drastronomy (08/17/2015) [-]
If that is what you mean, dont sugarcoat it. Call it national socialism/white supremacism

White nationalism implies european nationalism as well, which to be honest includes nearly all books centred around (postive aspects of) european history, philosophy, etc. Books relating to stoicism also would fit in. It seems normal european nationalism is a taboo subject considering its connotation to fascist italy and nazi germany, though.

Otherwise, all forms of libertarianism mentioned seems to be accurate.
User avatar #92049 to #92047 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/17/2015) [-]
That's eurocentrism, not white nationalism.
#92034 - pebar (08/17/2015) [-]
Talk me out of buying an m44 mosin nagant

because I think I'm gonna get one
#92059 to #92034 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
Nazi tears will flow!
User avatar #92042 to #92034 - akkere (08/17/2015) [-]
Have you checked your area for firearm instructions/shooting ranges to practice with first?
Do you have prior experience with firearms and if not, would prefer to start off with a pistol, which can later on lead to other options like ease of carrying out in public (given the right permits including conceal-carry)?
Are you aware that every year, thousands of nuggets owners succumb to symptoms of innawoods posting?
User avatar #92040 to #92034 - jewishcommunazi (08/17/2015) [-]
What use do you give it? Shooting ranges? Shoot stuff in the woods?
#92043 to #92035 - pebar (08/17/2015) [-]
but my peeps are here

also, i didn't know that board existed
#92028 - sugarcubesquare (08/17/2015) [-]

Such a sad day when this is the only man that knows what must be done.
#92041 to #92026 - drastronomy (08/17/2015) [-]
Thank god i wont be around to see the hell these cucks unleash
#92021 - anon (08/17/2015) [-]
User avatar #92036 to #92021 - drastronomy (08/17/2015) [-]
Hello jewishcommunazi
User avatar #92038 to #92036 - jewishcommunazi (08/17/2015) [-]
The DPRK does have a debt. Might not be as much as the US but it does.
User avatar #92039 to #92038 - jewishcommunazi (08/17/2015) [-]
Having about 90% of the debt to Russia forgiven helped, now its debt is probably small.
User avatar #92019 - mixednuts (08/17/2015) [-]
I'm not too fond of Rand Paul and a bit on the fence about Bernie Sanders. But with both of them in the race, has the subject of electoral reform come up or is there a possibility of either of them talking about it? I know it's a bit too hopeful, but it's something that I'd really like to hear. It's a subject that rarely comes up in US politics, and probably should. I'm willing to bet that a lot of Americans don't know what the phrase "first past the post" means and many might not even be aware that other electoral systems exist.

Rand Paul has links to the Libertarian party and I think he had considered running for president as a Libertarian before. While Bernie Sanders was elected to the Senate as an Independent candidate, and I'm pretty sure has talked about electoral reform before.
User avatar #92031 to #92019 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/17/2015) [-]
Both have a platform on issues with electoral reform. Rand Paul focuses on setting term limits for VPs, senators and Reps and Bernie Sanders focuses on limiting campaign donations or making it equally government funded.
User avatar #92020 to #92019 - princessren (08/17/2015) [-]
There is literally a Harvard Professor running on that sole issue now
#92012 - pebar (08/16/2015) [-]
what do you think when you see this?
User avatar #92037 to #92012 - drastronomy (08/17/2015) [-]
"Good" parenting
User avatar #92030 to #92012 - redandgreen (08/17/2015) [-]
Blind leading the blind.
User avatar #92014 to #92012 - jewishcommunazi (08/16/2015) [-]
What's that on her hair?
User avatar #92013 to #92012 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (08/16/2015) [-]
Terrible trigger discipline.
User avatar #92000 - drastronomy (08/16/2015) [-]
ITT we come up with a better political system than democracy.
A pseudo-technocratic direct democracy in which all state officials need a degree in their ministry, whether it be economics, a science, education, etc. - these ministers would be elected by people with a degree within the same field. The common people would have the right to vote to impeach any of these, and any minister could make a vote to impeach another. People were given voting rights based on their education. Eg, high school education = basic, banal topics with more or less zero importance. Degree in lets say engineering - votes within matters of science, perhaps education, infrastructure - etc. Thus, people with no mind for politics and/or stupid people do not get the right to vote
User avatar #92001 to #92000 - drastronomy (08/16/2015) [-]
also that get
#91989 - byposted (08/16/2015) [-]
I've found a TOP sperg on jewtube: an effeminate, though pro-White, homosexual French Canadian, with flowing content!

His most recent upload is an addition to his "kinky," "sword fighting," still series, uploaded just a half hour ago, as part of a wave of four videos.

I took care to archive each production on my HDD. Some of them are politically themed, such as the War of 1812 and Russia and Homosexuality.

Since I love you all, I'll share him here, first.


>mfw he just uploaded a Dylann Roof tribute video four seconds ago
#91999 to #91989 - byposted (08/16/2015) [-]

Before he was an aviator, and now he is an admiral! No altering of attire necessary! www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dWk2gzaIqc
#91998 to #91989 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#91996 to #91989 - byposted (08/16/2015) [-]
>Alistair my boy friend
#91993 to #91989 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#91990 to #91989 - schnizel (08/16/2015) [-]
holy shit
what the actual hell
#92017 to #91990 - klowserpok (08/17/2015) [-]
>fags like that live in my country
#91995 to #91990 - drastronomy (08/16/2015) [-]
#91991 to #91990 - byposted (08/16/2015) [-]
In the name of love

I was initially attracted to him because his avatar appeared sort of like I would imagine a retarded Roof
#91994 to #91991 - byposted (08/16/2015) [-]
"Attracted" in that I checked his channel oc lamo smh
User avatar #91987 - theism ONLINE (08/16/2015) [-]
Has Donald Trump even announced any policy plans yet? How can anyone take him seriously as a candidate if they have no idea what he plans to do?
 Friends (0)