Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (2): christmouth, tredbear, anonymous(26).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#26129 - tredbear has deleted their comment [-]
#26121 - tredbear (04/01/2013) [-]
someone gimme the beatdown of what is going on with the police today.
#26154 to #26121 - feelythefeel (04/02/2013) [-]
American Enforcement: Police brutality.
RCMP: Police brutality, eh?
User avatar #26147 to #26121 - CapnInterwebz (04/02/2013) [-]
I'd say "beatdown" sums it up as far as Seattle PD goes
User avatar #26148 to #26147 - CapnInterwebz (04/02/2013) [-]
As in "there are many nonwhite citizens being beatdown by the SPD"
User avatar #26098 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
What are your thoughts on the Vietnamese War, thread?
User avatar #26120 to #26098 - pebar (04/01/2013) [-]
It kind of set the limit on what you can and cannot do in war
User avatar #26118 to #26098 - eight (04/01/2013) [-]
It did help reduce the population, that is about it.
User avatar #26099 to #26098 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
It was probably one of the worst ideas ever
User avatar #26100 to #26099 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
Why is that?
User avatar #26101 to #26100 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
because it accomplished precisely nothing, besides death
User avatar #26102 to #26101 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
Some people say it's because America helped fight Communism.
User avatar #26103 to #26102 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
They did fight against communism, but they were naive to think they could win that war, and foolish to commit more troops after years of no success.
User avatar #26198 to #26103 - andriod (04/04/2013) [-]
If we had continued we would have won the war. For every American killed there were 10 Vietcong deaths. The war was handled poorly at the home front however and ended up if the funding cut. With no money our guys were sent home.
User avatar #26104 to #26103 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
So, you're telling me we went into a jungle, gave poor soldiers PTSD, went in thinking that they'd win the war in a few months or years, and then we got our asses kicked and went out of the ring as losers?

Shit, I would never enter a war like that.

But what about Afghanistan? Isn't like the same situation in Vietnam?
User avatar #26105 to #26104 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
The difference is in Afghanistan NATO actually removed the Taliban from power
User avatar #26106 to #26105 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
So we DID make some progress.
User avatar #26107 to #26106 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
yes, we made a lot of progress, but the thing is that the future is unclear. We can't leave before the country is rebuilt and stable, or else the terrorists will seize control of the government again. The problem I think with Afghanistan, is that we bit off more than we can chew, military operations are expensive, and Afghanistan is in no shape to fend for itself. It's a very tricky situation.
User avatar #26108 to #26107 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
Back in World War II didn't they make tin cans into ammo?
User avatar #26109 to #26108 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
I don't know
User avatar #26110 to #26109 - screwyouman ONLINE (04/01/2013) [-]
Well, that's all I need to know.
#26081 - anonymous (03/31/2013) [-]

Why are liberals uneducated about history and politics?
#26156 to #26081 - feelythefeel (04/02/2013) [-]
Because they don't see the glory of the fuhrer god saint king Bush and the rest of the holy republican party. They'll certainly learn to if you keep whining about it on the internet long enough, though.
#26111 to #26081 - anonymous (04/01/2013) [-]
They are too stupid to realize Obama is the son of Hitler and Stalin and the reencarnation of the antichrist.
User avatar #26091 to #26081 - kingnarnode (04/01/2013) [-]
not all liberals are hippie douchebags
#26090 to #26081 - anonymous (04/01/2013) [-]
Because they are easly fooled by the American Fürer (Barrack Hussein Obama) race politics.
They reject the word of god, And follow the media as sheep as more and more false flag shootings takes place.

It is just a matter of time until FEMA (Obamas Gestapo) will round up us intellectual conservetives, to death camps.
User avatar #26083 to #26081 - pebar (03/31/2013) [-]
Because they don't care enough to learn. The entire political party is one giant bandwagon.
#26082 to #26081 - anonymous (03/31/2013) [-]
#26096 to #26082 - repostsrepost (04/01/2013) [-]
What if he didn't and its just a government conspiracy?
#26112 to #26096 - anonymous (04/01/2013) [-]
Government conspiracy? Take off that tinfoil hat!

#26119 to #26112 - repostsrepost (04/01/2013) [-]
I think not. Its all a lie
#26077 - levchenko (03/31/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#26078 to #26077 - pebar has deleted their comment [-]
#26068 - anonymous (03/31/2013) [-]
funnyjunk.com/anime/ call them idiots
User avatar #26058 - liftplus ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
when will N. Korea grow some balls and launch a missile at a country
User avatar #26080 to #26058 - pebar (03/31/2013) [-]
whenever they figure out how a missile works
User avatar #26059 to #26058 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
The only missile they have capable of delivering a nuclear warhead, I believe, has never actually be confirmed to reach its declared range.
User avatar #26060 to #26059 - liftplus ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
yes yes we know this but when will you think they'll launch just being curious thats all
User avatar #26061 to #26060 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
When they actually have a missile capable of reaching anything significant, and at a time when it won't be shot down as soon as it enters the DMZ?
User avatar #26062 to #26061 - liftplus ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
User avatar #26063 to #26062 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
We'll be waiting a while.

Conventional ground war is more likely.
User avatar #26064 to #26063 - liftplus ONLINE (03/31/2013) [-]
yeah the only thing i think they're going to do is bomb the south or japan
User avatar #26065 to #26064 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
South. Reunification is like their top priority...
#26051 to #26050 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
Commie thread?
User avatar #26039 - derpityhurr (03/30/2013) [-]
buying dicks
#26048 to #26039 - anonymous (03/31/2013) [-]
buying FAT BEN'S POOP!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar #26030 - pebar (03/30/2013) [-]
We should just carpet bomb leaflets on NK that tells them the entire world is against them. But not in Pyongyang where all the "elite" people are, do it on the general population and cause an uproar. Have the people themselves deal with this.
User avatar #26046 to #26030 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
These people cry their eyes out when they see Dear Leader.

They're not going to believe anything from the West. And besides, to be dropping the leaflets, you're violating DPRK's airspace, which will most definitely begin hostilities. Then you're dealing with it yourself.
User avatar #26038 to #26030 - Shiny (03/30/2013) [-]
How is this any different, relatively speaking, from the Nazis spraying propaganda leaflets all over wartime London?
#26042 to #26038 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #26040 to #26038 - kingnarnode (03/30/2013) [-]
Why is that relevant, does using propaganda tactics make you as bad as Nazi's?
User avatar #26035 to #26030 - pebar (03/30/2013) [-]
NVM... it looks like South Korea has banned sending leaflets over so I guess they would never approve of Americans doing it.
#26034 to #26030 - anonymous (03/30/2013) [-]
Becouse it worked SO WELL the last time.
User avatar #26031 to #26030 - teoberry (03/30/2013) [-]
What they do to their civvies is sad. I'll willing to bet that Kim's gonna tell them that they won the war.
User avatar #26026 - kingnarnode (03/30/2013) [-]
Idk about you guys, but I'm excited to see if NATO has the balls to take down NK, this is gonna be a good un
User avatar #26032 to #26026 - eight (03/30/2013) [-]
If anyone attacks North Korea, it will be the start of World War 3. The U.S. will likely reinstate the draft.

We don't want another World War, the U.S Government does.
User avatar #26036 to #26032 - pebar (03/30/2013) [-]
North Korea has only enough material for a couple nukes and even then no way to deliver. China, their main ally, does not approve of NK's actions. If anything were to start WW3, it'd be that whole mess with Israel and Palestine.
The world wars were only good for America the first time because no battle ever came to the mainland. With technology the way it is today, they would. There is no motive for the gov to want it.
User avatar #26037 to #26036 - eight (03/30/2013) [-]
Well, when I say the U.S. government, I am talking about who is actually running the government. The central banks of the world, particularly the FED. They have every reason to start wars if it means more money will be placed in their pocket and more countries will fall under their schemes.
User avatar #26033 to #26032 - kingnarnode (03/30/2013) [-]
I think you underestimate how strong NATO is
User avatar #26027 to #26026 - oxan (03/30/2013) [-]
The rational person inside of me wants DPRK to just sit the fuck down.

The rest of me wants to see this turn into a clusterfuck.
#26011 - djequalizee (03/30/2013) [-]
Super high tech N. Korea attack Sim.
#26018 to #26011 - anonymous (03/30/2013) [-]
Japan: 0
Korean-Nato coalition: 1
User avatar #26087 to #26018 - zaiopeperse (04/01/2013) [-]
Japan has nothing to do with that illustration at all. It's just chilling while missiles pass by.
User avatar #26007 - stutterguy (03/30/2013) [-]
I've been living under a rock for a while and I don't know much about this North Korea dilemma. My only question is:
Is England caught up in this in anyway or can I just sit in ignorant bliss?
User avatar #26022 to #26007 - oxan (03/30/2013) [-]
Every nation is somehow related. I believe even New Zealand was threatened.
User avatar #26009 to #26007 - yourbed (03/30/2013) [-]
The UK has been apart of the conflict since July 1950.
User avatar #26012 to #26009 - stutterguy (03/30/2013) [-]
And that's Good?
User avatar #26025 to #26012 - oxan (03/30/2013) [-]
The Korean War was in the 50s or whatever, and the UK fought against the DPRK (North Korea). The Korean War was never actually concluded (there was an armistice, which means they just stopped fighting. There was no actual peace treaty that officially ended the war). Because the UK is in NATO and because everyone loves to suck the US' dick, the UK will probably involve itself in a ground war in the event of military conflict beginning again on the Korean Peninsula.

User avatar #26013 to #26012 - yourbed (03/30/2013) [-]
User avatar #26014 to #26013 - stutterguy (03/30/2013) [-]
This is why I don't get involved in these. I got confused by eleven words. I'm just gonna sit and smile idly at the world.
User avatar #26015 to #26014 - yourbed (03/30/2013) [-]
Eh, it is ok, i get easly confused whenever someone tries to tell me about the conflict in Balkan.
User avatar #26024 to #26015 - oxan (03/30/2013) [-]
Which Balkan conflict are you talking about?
User avatar #26028 to #26024 - yourbed (03/30/2013) [-]
The Break up of Yugoslavia.
User avatar #26044 to #26028 - oxan (03/31/2013) [-]
>Tito leads socialist Yugoslavia to greatness
>Becomes totally awesome and contrasts the West's propaganda about communism
>West fuels nationalism amongst the people of Yugoslavia that Tito was able to control after he dies
>Each republic wants more independence
>The state of Yugoslavia breaks up into Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia and whatever else I'm forgetting
>Serbia looks to create Greater Serbia
>Begins ethnic cleansing against Muslims is Bosnia - Bosniaks

That's in a nutshell.
User avatar #26123 to #26044 - arisaka (04/01/2013) [-]
I have friends who used to live in former Yugoslavia during TIto's reign.

It wasn't as great as you think it is.

Socialism in one country doesn't work. It's dumb.
User avatar #26431 to #26123 - oxan (04/07/2013) [-]
Socialism in one country is better than in none.

What, when a single country experiences a revolution, if the rest of the world doesn't follow immediately should they just pack up and hand control back to the capitalists? Spontaneous, global, simultaneous revolution is impossible.
User avatar #26439 to #26431 - arisaka (04/07/2013) [-]
Socialism in one country only produces a spectacular society.

It is, as you would call it, 'false consciousness.'

User avatar #26016 to #26015 - stutterguy (03/30/2013) [-]
I didn't even know that place existed.
User avatar #26000 - mykoira (03/29/2013) [-]
'The situation is now critical with the outbreak of war is probably only hours away'
-Kin Jong Un
#26008 to #26000 - yourbed (03/30/2013) [-]
They just announced that they are in a state of war agian.

User avatar #26004 to #26000 - kingnarnode (03/29/2013) [-]
Good, I hope they finally go over bored so the UN will finally be forced to man up and do something about and rid the world of this disgusting tyranny.
#26002 to #26000 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
Full qoute.

'The situation is now critical with the outbreak of war is probably only seconds away. So open the fucking bathroom cho! those damn cakes your wife made gotta go somewhere!"

~Kim Jong Un
User avatar #26001 to #26000 - mykoira (03/29/2013) [-]
btw this was said few hours ago
User avatar #25999 - eight (03/29/2013) [-]
All Wars Are Bankers Wars


Repost because it is very important to know.
User avatar #26029 to #25999 - ragnarfag (03/30/2013) [-]
"The Moloch: A Critical History of the U.S.A." by Karlheinz Deschner.
User avatar #26003 to #25999 - ragnarfag (03/29/2013) [-]
Read a good book about this not long ago, I don't know if it exists in english.
#25987 - levchenko (03/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #26114 to #25987 - mexicoman (04/01/2013) [-]
I think that both sides of the equation are reprehensible in their own right, and have historical wrongs of their own. But I think that Israel and Palestine have made progress and I look forward to a two state solution. The problem being that Israel's overreaches and overreactions are nothing they will every have to answer for save for maybe a few lives and some property damage. America has a fucked up and unbending alliance with them and that is not an ideal recipe.
#25997 to #25987 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #25995 to #25987 - eight (03/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, basically it.

It is all propaganda on TV coming from Israel. It is a mess. I don't even know what their agenda is. I just know the Israeli government is trying their best to make the world hate Palestine by spreading misinformation about them.
User avatar #25989 to #25987 - teoberry (03/29/2013) [-]
It's true. Israel is overreacting, they've basically got little man syndrome. It's like me egging someone's house, and them blowing up my neighborhood because of it. The Palestinians don't have that much in the way of weapons. The best they have are a few Fajr-5 missiles if i'm correct. The rest is just RPG's and stuff like that.
#25990 to #25989 - repostsrepost (03/29/2013) [-]
I didn't realize thousands of rockets were just eggs.
User avatar #25991 to #25990 - teoberry (03/29/2013) [-]
Let me rephrase the analogy: It's like me throwing an egg at someone's house, and them coming back and tossing a grenade at mine.
#25992 to #25991 - repostsrepost (03/29/2013) [-]
I'm just sayin if you charge at me with a rock with the intention of killing me, and I have a gun, its not overreacting when I shoot you.
User avatar #25993 to #25992 - teoberry (03/29/2013) [-]
I made a bit too simple. I don't know quite how to explain it, but it's like me throwing a rock at you, and then you showing up later and stabbing me. It's okay to bomb them while they're bombing you, but when they've stopped, I think it's unnecessary to use so much force.
User avatar #26089 to #25993 - zaiopeperse (04/01/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure Palestine would've continued if they could. They still want their land back, understandably.
#25980 to #25978 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
And give him lots of cake!
#25984 to #25980 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
#25994 to #25984 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
#25996 to #25994 - feelythefeel (03/29/2013) [-]
This is why anons can't have nice things.
#25974 - radiserne (03/28/2013) [-]
So NK just adjusted their missile launchers towards SK and cut the hotline between them, while the US are testing their long-range bombers in SK. Second Korea War this week?
#25981 to #25974 - anonymous (03/29/2013) [-]
A man can dream... hopefully....
User avatar #25977 to #25974 - BeaverBalls (03/28/2013) [-]
honestly i really doubt it
#25968 - anonymous (03/28/2013) [-]
Just a question. Why is it that the Liberals of Europe are the most tolerant of Islam in their countries?

Like many religions, Islam is at odds with Social Liberal values. However unlike most religions most Muslims still hold these views today. They're against Secularism, Women's rights, gay rights, and Multiculturalism (considering most Muslims carve out ethnic enclaves instead of mixing with the rest of the population).

As someone who likes to consider themselves as Socially Liberal I don't see anything wrong with saying "if you aren't going to tolerate me, I won't tolerate you. Get the fuck out."
User avatar #25998 to #25968 - Shiny (03/29/2013) [-]
Welcome to the grand melting pot, a fight between people that accept cultures that hate them and people that reject cultures that don't.
#25985 to #25968 - oxan has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #25970 to #25968 - beatmasterz (03/28/2013) [-]
Well, when they're in my country, they simply have to abide to the rules. They can do all the shit they like except illegal things. So it's no big deal.
#25986 to #25967 - oxan (03/29/2013) [-]
A brilliant piece, eight.
User avatar #25988 to #25986 - eight (03/29/2013) [-]
Thank Michael Rivero, he is the genius behind it.
 Friends (0)