Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Anonymous comments allowed.
#122485 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
#122472 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
I haven't regretted any vote I've made since voting for Ted Cruz as senator, what a goop filled monster baby.

He's never getting elected in Texas again if Hilary wins.
#122476 to #122472 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(07/21/2016) [-]
I was actually impressed that Cruz stuck to his guns. Better than being a sellout like the Bern man.
#122484 to #122476 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
The problem is Republicans are too principled in many cases, the democrats continue to sell out their values to win elections.

Bernie is a sell out, but Ted framed himself as anti establishment, if trump wasn't in the race he'd probably be the nominee. He should be the most willing to join Trump and would be the most forgiven of all the bowed candidates.

Instead he's playing politics, and he's shitty at it.
#122473 to #122472 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
god forbid someone has principles
#122482 to #122473 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
The principle of trying to destroy your parties chances of winning so you can say " i told you so" and possibly get elected after shillaries first term.

He miscalculated though, if she does win hes going to have to move back to canada.
#122486 to #122482 - figatron
Reply +2
(07/21/2016) [-]
If you're only argument is we need to beat Hilary, then your candidate is shit. At some point it's not enough to beat Hilary you need a president who actually has good policies. Outside of immigration Trump doesn't have a single decent policy position. And many suicidal ones like protectionism. Trumpkins are all butt hurt that Cruz chose standing by his principles over being a sheep. He's the only one to not abandon constitutionalism for populism. At the convention anyways. Btw, Reagan never endorsed Ford.
#122487 to #122486 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Thats not my only argument for why I support Trump, therefore the rest of your comment is bullshit that I can ignore.
#122463 - braus
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
*Trump makes a mistake*

IT WAS ALL PART OF HIS MASTER PLAN TO GET MORE COVERAGE! HAVEN'T YOU READ HIS BOOKS? I HAVEN'T BUT I KNOW SOMEONE ELSE WHO HAS!
#122469 to #122463 - thumbfortrump
Reply +3
(07/21/2016) [-]
>implying he makes mistakes
#122479 to #122469 - braus
Reply +1
(07/21/2016) [-]
Well he did choose Pence.
#122509 to #122479 - duudegladiator
Reply +1
(07/21/2016) [-]
Pence is a relatively strong choice, its just that he needs to start talking about himself more and more.

He hit it off at the Convention.
#122510 to #122509 - braus
Reply +1
(07/21/2016) [-]
I'll look into him more. All I know is that he's one of those "pray the gay away" people
#122514 to #122510 - duudegladiator
Reply +1
(07/21/2016) [-]
I think he wasnt that kinda guy, but instead he supported the Religious liberties aspect, and then some nuts pushed the rest in.
#122515 to #122514 - braus
Reply +1
(07/22/2016) [-]
Well as long we legally use our nuts to help push things in I'm okay with it.
#122459 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36842940

I can hardly believe that even a UKIP councillor would be stupid enough to say Remain voters should be killed.
#122457 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
ITT:

Things that the liberal left advocates that you actually agree with.

>development of alternative sources of energy such as solar, wind, nuclear, geothermal, etc just don't punish current energy industries such as coal, oil, and natural gas

>suspicion of large corporate entities it's too bad that they don't realise that a large corporation can only really exist with the presence of a large government entity

>critical of unnecessary government intervention into other nations affairs and imperialism in general
#122471 to #122457 - figatron
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
The left hates nuclear energy because of environmental concerns that science has already disproven
#122503 to #122471 - anon
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Yet ironically their anti-nuclear activism CAUSES environmental problems when they block new reactors from being built and force the continued use of older reactors built on earlier safety standards.
#122475 to #122471 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Yeah I always forget that.
#122470 to #122457 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Business should be more environmentally aware. Not only is it good for future mankind, it also benefits businesses long term.
#122474 to #122470 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Do you think that businesses should be forced by the government to be more environmentally aware via regulation?
#122480 to #122474 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
In terms of serious polution where it is possible to drastically reduce it, yes.

In terms of small differences, no.
#122465 to #122457 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
-Pot should be legal
-Higher standards for protecting the environment

That's about it, really. I know I sound like a hippie right about now
#122466 to #122465 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Oh I forgot about drugs. I'm for drug legalization, or at the very least decriminalization.
#122458 to #122457 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
"it's too bad that they don't realise that a large corporation can only really exist with the presence of a large government entity "

Why do you say that?
#122460 to #122458 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
As a business grows larger it struggles to cater to smaller groups of people, and eventually are beat out by smaller business that are more flexible in their services to their local populace. Large business usually advocate for more regulations because they discourage the growth of smaller businesses that can't afford it, while the larger businesses can continue to monopolize their particular markets and grow their revenues even though they may pay a bit more in terms of regulatory costs.
#122461 to #122460 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
I don't think it's as simple as that - Governments also create anti-monopoly legislation to reduce the likelihood of exactly what you describe.

Some smaller nation's economies are entirely dominated by large multinational corporations and they don't have large government.
#122462 to #122461 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
That's true, but most governments don't solely have regulations to break up monopolies, and many companies can cooperate with each other to overcome those regulations. We can see this with the internet providers parceling out sections of the US to where they agree to have monopolies over certain areas and don't infringe on each others customers.

And the term you're missing there is "multinational", these businesses don't grow in the smaller and poorer nations, they grow in the larger and richer ones, then spread into the smaller nations, beating out the local businesses with their much greater resources.
#122493 to #122462 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
So you're saying your argument is only true for countries in western Europe and north America?
#122495 to #122493 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
No. I'm saying if you have a larger corporation begin doing business in an area with smaller businesses, those larger businesses will usually be able to outcompete smaller businesses as they have far greater resources and don't necessarily rely on those outside markets to hold themselves up.

A good example would be Chinese corporations heavily investing into many African economies and trying to monopolize their energy industries.
#122498 to #122495 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Unless it's lack of anti-monopoly regulation
#122497 to #122495 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
That has nothing to do with regulation though, isn't that economies of scale?
#122501 to #122497 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Larger corporations created from nations with greater amounts of regulation could monopolize foreign industries, is what I meant to say.
#122502 to #122501 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Oh, OK.
#122500 to #122497 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Regulation plays into it. A larger business will be able to apply more resources into an overseas investment, so if regulation actually benefits larger corporations like I claimed earlier than that would mean that larger corporations could more successfully monopolize foreign industries more easily.
#122443 - theism
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
If you outlaw tennis balls only outlaws will have tennis balls.
#122456 to #122443 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
No no no, if you outlaw tennis balls you'll just see a rise in golf ball related incidents.
#122447 to #122443 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Why are you talking about tennis balls.
#122448 to #122447 - theism
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
The RNC banned tennis balls but not guns and there's tons of salt over it.
#122477 to #122448 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
The sign as you enter the RNC said "Firearms" as one of the banned items for the convention though, along with "weapons".
#122481 to #122477 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Why are you thumbing me down for asking a legitimate question lol.
#122483 to #122481 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Oh I didn't mean to. I'm on my phone a lot so sometimes I'll swipe and accidently thumb somebody.

secretly I hate you and wish for your downfall
#122490 to #122483 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Oh okay, I also thought it was odd since it was from you.

pls dont kill me
#122449 to #122448 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Sweet.
#122450 to #122449 - theism
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Tbh, if you're afraid of tennis balls guns might be a bit more of a problem.
#122499 to #122450 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Maybe they smuggle the drugs inside the tennis balls
#122451 to #122450 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
I think it's more to make sure no one shows up and throws tennis balls at people.
#122452 to #122451 - theism
Reply +2
(07/20/2016) [-]
What if someone shows up and throws guns at people?
#122453 to #122452 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Those are the questions that keep me up at night.
#122446 to #122443 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
If you outlaw laws than only outlaws will have laws.
#122437 - braus
Reply -1
(07/20/2016) [-]
Trump really choked during that 60 minutes interview. Pence was a horrible choice.
#122434 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
I'm not a Boris fan but this made me smile

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36839721
#122431 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Wait shit, I'm number three overall thumb wise. I thought they were ranking all the boards together at first.

pebar is way in first thumb wise. I think I'd have more if I wasn't getting so many anon reds, I wonder if those count.
#122432 to #122431 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Thumbs down must count because some people have negative values. I don't know if anon thumbs do or don't count though.
#122435 to #122432 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
meh
#122433 to #122432 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
oh yes let this happen. so we can thumb you down to oblivion
#122430 - youregaylol
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#122405 - anon
Reply +1
(07/20/2016) [-]
ROSES ARE RED
VIOLETS ARE BLUE
FAT BEN JUST MADE
A VERY BIG POO
#122404 - shekelnator
Reply +2
(07/20/2016) [-]
guys Nero is banned from twitter. i actually disagree with him on everything. but banning someone from his free speech is a red line.

if you dont know who is he. Nero is that gay fag kike jew right wing nationalist. niggers did not like his tweets so twitter jews banned him
#122439 to #122404 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
What did he say that ACTUALLY got him banned? Apparently he sent a lynch mob after that lady in Ghostbusters, but I can't find the tweet where he did that.
#122445 to #122439 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
FreeMilo Milo Yiannopoulos talks to CNBC about his Twitter Suspension this was posted just now
#122464 to #122445 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Yeah... I was looking at his Twitter a while ago and I only saw two tweets from Nero to Leslie, and neither of them said "everyone send gorilla pictures to her and be as racist as possible."
#122444 to #122439 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
according to my source, Leslie Jones (the so-called victim) got in touch with the CEO of Twitter (Jack) and it was after a private conversation that Milo was banned

reason.com/blog/2016/07/20/twitter-bans-milo-yiannopoulos-initiate
#122455 to #122444 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
The article you link to states "Jones began receiving truly despicable tweets and images from Yiannopoulos's crowd". You might question whether Milo Yiannopoulos encouraged or asked others to do this but 'so-called victim'? There doesn't seem any doubt at all that she was harassed.
#122467 to #122455 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
he provably did not, though
#122491 to #122467 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Based on what I've seen I don't think he did incite harassment he was just unpleasant. Your 'so-called victim' statement is such bullshit though - look at what she was receiving. I'm not saying he is responsible but she clearly was harassed.
#122440 to #122439 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
that big black hippopotamus deserve it
#122441 to #122440 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Fuckin hell, Omar.

What did she do to deserve being targeted?
What did he do to deserve being banned?
#122427 to #122404 - whoozy
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
So he's a kike jew banned by twitter jews?
#122428 to #122427 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
This man, this nigger-cum slobbering kike faggot, is being held up as the face of the alt-right.

The god only chosen twitter jews does not like jews who disagree with them either.
#122409 to #122404 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Twitter can ban whoever they want, it isn't an infringement on his free speech as it is limited by their terms of service which he signed up to.
#122438 to #122409 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
So can America also ban undesirables?
#122454 to #122438 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Do you think that these things are some how equivalent?
#122468 to #122454 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
How are they not?
#122492 to #122468 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/21/2016) [-]
Because having free speech in the first amendment is not the same as signing up to Twitter's terms of service.
#122535 to #122492 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(07/22/2016) [-]
Who does the first ammendment apply to?
#122798 to #122535 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/23/2016) [-]
The question:
"So can America also ban undesirables?"
isn't qualified.

Also, if rights are inalienable then they apply to everyone.
#122426 to #122409 - anon
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Just because they can doesn't mean they should
#122429 to #122426 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
I don't particularly think people should be banned from 'stuff' for racism, even though I disagree with it.

If they think he's been involved in targeted harassment then that's different and I think they are right to ban him.
#122411 to #122409 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
what term of service?

Saying fuck niggers will get you banned?
but saying fuck whites wont get you banned?
#122412 to #122411 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
This isn't all the Terms of Service but the relevant bit is here:

support.twitter.com/articles/18311#

Evidence of your claim please?
#122414 to #122413 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
That doesn't provide evidence for your claim - can you prove that Nero was banned for what you say?

He seems to have been banned for encouraging harassment.
#122415 to #122414 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
GIF
oh. going to to twitter and telling white people are shit is no harassment right?

fuck off nigger. before some catch you and burn you hanged in a cross.
#122416 to #122415 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Saying white people are shit is racist.

He was banned for targeted harassment and encouragement of harassment of Leslie Jones.
Do you understand that they aren't the same thing?

Also, I'm not black, you are a moron.
#122417 to #122416 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
BLM fans were targeting white people and encouraging harassing them

no bans was applied. you dont want to be called a racist for that :^)
#122418 to #122417 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Which white people specifically? Can you prove there were no bans applied?

This guy is high profile and encouraged and participated in targeted harassment. I wouldn't be at all surprised if other people harassed people and haven't been banned but he breached the terms of service and was banned for it - simple.
#122419 to #122418 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
yes there was no bans applied. im on twitter daily

more like. this guy really proving us wrong and wanting his freedom of speech to be higher than ours.
#122420 to #122419 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Sorry, not buying your word for that.

He was banned for targeted harassment, that isn't proving anybody wrong.
#122421 to #122420 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
well then. you can carry on with your delusional life
#122422 to #122421 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Yes, wanting to see evidence makes me the delusional one.
#122423 to #122422 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
not searching for it what makes you delusional while not beleiving others have seen it
#122425 to #122423 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
You're making a claim and I'm asking you for evidence.

Given that you don't seem to understand the reasons for the ban I'm doubtful of your word.
#122406 to #122404 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
>if you don't know who he is


everyone and their brother knows who he is
#122436 to #122406 - theism
Reply -1
(07/20/2016) [-]
He's not really culturally relevant outside autism support groups.
#122407 to #122406 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
we daily see newfags here
#122408 to #122407 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
even if you live under a rock, you'd have still heard of him
#122410 to #122408 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
i wont deny that tbh
#122403 - whitechino
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Paul Ryan
"Let the other party go on with dividing up of people."
"Aren't we supposed to seen beyond class and ethnicity"?
----"Quick, show this weird looking minority that's here with us white folk. Yeah, that'll show we're the part of whatever that is".
#122402 to #122401 - pebar
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
"harassment" my ass...
#122398 - asotil
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#122397 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
Pick two people in the photo.

One you have to bang.

One you become.
#122400 to #122397 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(07/20/2016) [-]
I'll bang the chick right above the one guys tan hat.

I'll become pre-transformation captain America right in the front right.
#122424 to #122400 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(07/20/2016) [-]
The earrings tho

Forehead shades guy is slightly better.
#122396 to #122395 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(07/19/2016) [-]
now the real battle begins
#122393 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2016) [-]
#122392 - anon
Reply 0
(07/19/2016) [-]
Labour (UK party) is such a joke right now.