Click to expand
Latest users (3): klowserpok, lulzreborntwice, youregaylol, anonymous(12).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #55352 - nigalthornberry (01/11/2014) [-]
So what would you say about C.Christie vs B.Obama on their issue handling so far.
User avatar #55353 to #55352 - akkere (01/11/2014) [-]
I think overall, they're both pretty hamfisted in solving issues. Some examples for Obama off the top of my head being the launch of national healthcare (which was poorly constructed), imposing the idea of involvement in Syria, etc. And for Christie, the lack of oversight over aides and probably the poor recovery from Sandy (though I appreciate he at least didn't hold off on accepting help when the Hurricane first swept in, as his Republican constituents would've had for the sake of securing the election).

They're not very desirable leaders.
User avatar #55355 to #55353 - nigalthornberry (01/11/2014) [-]
I'd rather have christie since he addresses the problems
User avatar #55356 to #55355 - akkere (01/11/2014) [-]
Not really. He ignores quite a bit of them more than he addresses them. Like when FEMA brought in trailers for Sandy victims to live in outside their ruined homes, Christie did nothing to temporarily change the tractor law preventing them from being used. This left a lot of people (myself included) to either live in ruined homes or have to stay at hotels that ended up being very costly for FEMA as a whole.
User avatar #55368 to #55356 - hawaiianhappysauce (01/12/2014) [-]
Chris Christy would ignore the problem, then when he gets criticized he would say "THESE PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS" so everyone in the media and the republican party would fall in love with him again because the teabaggers want corporations to run the country.
#55343 - capitalists (01/11/2014) [-]
undeadwill will be so jelly of my user name.
undeadwill will be so jelly of my user name.
User avatar #55351 to #55343 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
But I am you.
#55341 - anon (01/11/2014) [-]
I know most of the Americans here don't like the idea of a strong federal government.

So I have to wonder, how do you feel about the Articles of Confederation?

User avatar #55342 to #55341 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
Meh, a slightly stronger federal government does have many benefits that can't be ignored. I'd much rather just have a stronger constitution to limit the overreach of government.
#55304 - hitlerwascool (01/10/2014) [-]
What economic system is china and north Korea? Its not capitalist nor communist. I'd say socialism or nationalism. And no its not "state capitalism" that's a commie term for commies that fuck up.
User avatar #55329 to #55304 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
I forgot about China, which I'd say it's basically a fascist-style economy. Capitalism and private businesses make up for a significant amount of the country's economy, but the strong state might sometimes interfere to make them produce for the nation.
User avatar #55309 to #55304 - jewishcommunazi (01/10/2014) [-]
State capitalism as far as I see it has the state doing the role of the capitalist class, therefore is a valid term. Although I'm not sure NK is that. Maybe it comes closest to fascism. I prefer to refer to it as state feudalism though.
#55310 to #55309 - anon (01/10/2014) [-]
The state controls all capital
communism in a nutshell
User avatar #55311 to #55310 - jewishcommunazi (01/10/2014) [-]
That's a weird thing considering communism has neither a state nor capital. What you're referring to is state socialism, which is part of the marxist-leninist theory to achieve communism, but it was still not achieved, otherwise it's be global.

State socialism is different from state capitalism in may aspects.
Although most of the economy is nationalized in both, state socialism focuses on cooperation to fulfill a plan and the population being rewarded based on their contribution.
State capitalism has the managers having more say in the enterprises and the workers less, and managers are rewarded for obtaining profit for themselves while the plan, if there is one estabilished, is almost irrelevant.
User avatar #55313 to #55311 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
You're never going to get passed state socialism for the same reason you hate the bourgeoisie in the first place: people in power don't like giving it up.
Even your pure communism would naturally gravitate towards state socialism because the proles would elect more knowledgeable workers to represent the industry. This pseudo government would have the same authority as every other government. It would eventually evolve into its own class and you'd be back where you started.
User avatar #55314 to #55313 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
That's why I'm a fan of direct democracy based on debating.
User avatar #55315 to #55314 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #55316 to #55315 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
What's wrong with it? Better than majority ruling I think.
User avatar #55319 to #55316 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
>The majority could enslave the minority
>There would still be people who don't want communism
>Larger industries could steal all the resources
>The working class barely even votes now
>The masses don't pay attention to what goes on around them so they could never vote responsibly
User avatar #55321 to #55319 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
Most of those would seemingly happen under majority ruling, not the one I want.
#55306 to #55304 - anon (01/10/2014) [-]
>Economic System

Something tells me commies aren't the only one that fuck up.
User avatar #55318 to #55306 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
The state owns all business=nationalism.
User avatar #55325 to #55318 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
Nationalism is the belief in national identity, it's like strong patriotism. Nationalization refers to the act of turning a private institution into a public one though, these two things aren't related with each other at all.
#55344 to #55325 - capitalists (01/11/2014) [-]
So what is China because its not capitalist, but its not a welfare state I can only assume it is a socialist nation with a large amount of foreign business. It still has money but no private property, free trade, free markets or private enterprise.
User avatar #55345 to #55344 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
It stopped being socialist almost right after Mao's death.
#55346 to #55345 - capitalists (01/11/2014) [-]
What is the difference?
User avatar #55347 to #55346 - jewishcommunazi (01/11/2014) [-]
Deng's economic reforms.

The government still has a monopoly on things like banks and oil, but private property is getting more common since them. More recent policies slowed down the privatizations and deregulations in favour of a more keynesian economy, but they seem to have lost interest in socialism itself.
#55348 to #55347 - capitalists (01/11/2014) [-]
Well that's good.
#55652 to #55354 - capitalists (01/17/2014) [-]
MFW China becomes capitalist
MFW China becomes capitalist
#55302 - lulzforhiroshima (01/10/2014) [-]

What did they fucking expect? Its like their surprised or something.

This is Russia, take it or leave it. It ain't really gonna get better then Putin until the people change.
#55303 to #55302 - lulzforhiroshima (01/10/2014) [-]
Yeah Putin, shoot those faggets down for being stupid enough to go to Russia with your PP2000 9x19mm rounds.
User avatar #55295 - undeadwill (01/10/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link

Commies are goin insane.
User avatar #55308 to #55295 - pebar ONLINE (01/10/2014) [-]
The ethical egoism of Ayn Rand and the psychological egoism as the axiom of capitalist economics are different things.
User avatar #55317 to #55308 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
I didn't understand that too well but okay.
Wanna help out?

I've chosen to ignore her statement as she is foaming at the mouth about Ayn Rand but everything else needs to be dealt with.
User avatar #55320 to #55317 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
well good luck with that
User avatar #55322 to #55320 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
no help?
User avatar #55324 to #55322 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
The idea that people will be generous at their own cost is retarded. Evolutionarily speaking, you have to spread your own genes; you don't help your competition spread their genes. While it's true that social connections are very valuable, you don't help people you don't care about.
People are naturally selfish; deal with it.

Don't copy my post like last time; use it to form your own arguments that are relevant to the discussion.
User avatar #55326 to #55324 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
I am talking about the response. To it. The recent one.
User avatar #55328 to #55326 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
Schools of Thought in Classical Liberalism, Part 2: Milton Friedman and the Chicago School He has some good points and they're pretty much why I do not defend anarchism. Government has legitimate functions such as dealing with crime and limiting negative externalities.
User avatar #55612 to #55328 - valeriya (01/16/2014) [-]
Sorry to hit a dead-ish thread, but what about non-profitable things, I'm struggling to remember the actual term, but street lighting and national defense are examples of the thing I'm trying to remember.
#55615 to #55612 - pebar ONLINE (01/16/2014) [-]
public goods are talked about at 5:00
User avatar #55336 to #55328 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
Can I post the video?
User avatar #55338 to #55336 - pebar ONLINE (01/11/2014) [-]
I guess, it's a great series.
User avatar #55298 to #55295 - schnizel (01/10/2014) [-]
What did they say?
#55301 to #55298 - hitlerwascool (01/10/2014) [-]
Read nigga
#55305 to #55301 - schnizel (01/10/2014) [-]
No, I don't want to nigga
No, I don't want to nigga
User avatar #55294 - kanadetenshi (01/10/2014) [-]

Please keep your politicians out of my science.
User avatar #55280 to #55279 - undeadwill (01/09/2014) [-]
Did Ayn Rand idolize a serial killer? The answer here.
User avatar #55281 to #55280 - Shiny (01/09/2014) [-]
....on the other hand, it's pretty hard to contend with a straight face that Ayn Rand wasn't a shitty person.
User avatar #55307 to #55292 - akkere (01/10/2014) [-]
Preaching against collectivism while relishing in the collectivist hive mind that was her fanbase who easily would've persecuted anyone that Rand saw fit for it, i.e. Nathaniel Branden.
You know, simple stuff.
User avatar #55323 to #55307 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #55327 to #55323 - akkere (01/11/2014) [-]
You need to login to view this link
The very words of Ayn Rand herself.
Nathaniel Branden's account of the relationship and fallout with Ayn Rand cult (of which he was apart of, being in a relationship with Rand)
You need to login to view this link
Humorous recollection of the tale (also: Elvis)
User avatar #55334 to #55327 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
Seems to be a women's scorn and a very human break down compared to what I've seen.
User avatar #55339 to #55334 - akkere (01/11/2014) [-]
She "excommunicated" him from her group and sicked the cult on him by relating an unfortunate but regular break-up to the entire Objectivist movement and theory as a whole.
User avatar #55340 to #55339 - undeadwill (01/11/2014) [-]
"Hell have no fury like a scorned woman"
User avatar #55287 to #55281 - valeriya (01/09/2014) [-]
She's essentially written a guide on how to create situations ideal for a socialist revolution without even realizing it.
User avatar #55278 - schnizel (01/09/2014) [-]
Muhammad Ali - Racial Integration
#55271 - anon (01/09/2014) [-]

What could possibly go wrong?
User avatar #55283 to #55271 - Shiny (01/09/2014) [-]
Pride in American Exceptionalism
Our proud history of Liberty as defined by our Founding Fathers"

User avatar #55269 - byposted (01/09/2014) [-]
Let's Sing Wrecking Ball

Our Prince is back.
User avatar #55300 to #55269 - jewishcommunazi (01/10/2014) [-]
I thought it was the guy from "Remember Germany".
#55270 to #55269 - anon (01/09/2014) [-]
I bet that's you.
User avatar #55252 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
It's weird to think that American Republicans have their roots in early American Democrats, and something like vice versa. Anyone want to discuss/explain that?
User avatar #55276 to #55252 - Ruspanic ONLINE (01/09/2014) [-]
I was taught that it happened in phases.
Basically the party switch started with the New Deal. After a string of Republican Presidents, the Democrats finally reclaimed the White House with FDR, partly because of Herbert Hoover being super unpopular and partly because they reached out to new constituencies such as labor unions. So the Democrats became welfare statists instead of the Jeffersonian liberals they once were. Then there were a bunch of Democratic Presidents after that (except Eisenhower), and as the Democrats presided over the Civil Rights Movement, Republicans such as Nixon tried to win back power by appealing to the social-conservative Southern Democrats (the Jim Crow people) and bringing them to the Republican Party. Under Reagan the Republicans adopted neoliberal economic policies, and then finally they integrated the evangelicals and religious conservatives. That's more or less where we are now, with Democrats being mostly pro-labor and socially liberal people, and Republicans being mostly pro-business and socially conservative people.
User avatar #55266 to #55252 - pebar ONLINE (01/09/2014) [-]
Bill Whittle - Racism - Democrats and Republicans switch sides?
User avatar #55264 to #55252 - bypo (01/09/2014) [-]
Nothing is weird about it if you know the history of American parties. Jeffersonian Republicans laid the foundations for the Democrat Party. Liberals were purged from the GOP by the Nixon presidency and here the political "shift" materialized, giving us the modern divide.
User avatar #55265 to #55264 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
Ah, that makes sense.
User avatar #55257 to #55252 - lulzforhiroshima (01/09/2014) [-]
the republicans are complete shit now. Forever stained by people such as Rick fucking santorum, Rick - praying problems to go away in stadiums - perry and michele bachmann.... i could go on and on...
Most conservatives now a days are bible thumping morons who only want to take us a 1000 years back in time.
User avatar #55259 to #55257 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
How did it get like that? How did our parties get swapped around?
User avatar #55260 to #55259 - lulzforhiroshima (01/09/2014) [-]
i dont know

All i know is both parties are shit but the democrats are a bit, tiny bit better.
User avatar #55263 to #55260 - hawaiianhappysauce (01/09/2014) [-]
It's not a democrat / republican issue. It's a moderate vs extreme issue. Extreme Liberals and extreme conservatives are absolutely horrible. The Tea Party used to represent the ideology to stop this overwhelming government spending, now it's bible thumpers.
User avatar #55289 to #55263 - lulzforhiroshima (01/09/2014) [-]
the democrats and republicans are almost the same thing, its not a moderate vs. extreme, its a retard vs. a retard issue
User avatar #55268 to #55263 - pebar ONLINE (01/09/2014) [-]
Andrew Klavan: The Extremists are Coming!
#55267 to #55263 - anon (01/09/2014) [-]
The tea party doesn't give a damn about social issues;
get your facts straight, dumbass.
User avatar #55261 to #55260 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
Mu opinion in a nutshell.
User avatar #55258 to #55257 - lulzforhiroshima (01/09/2014) [-]
by us i meant murica
#55253 to #55252 - anon (01/09/2014) [-]
Republicans weren't always Bible thumpers, if that's what you mean.
User avatar #55254 to #55253 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
Yeah, that used to be Democrats. Weird.
User avatar #55251 to #55249 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
Thank link crap can wait, I'm more steamed about that picture myself.
User avatar #55250 to #55249 - byposted (01/09/2014) [-]
#55242 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
From each whatever they are willing,
to each according to their worth.
User avatar #55248 to #55242 - feelythefeel (01/09/2014) [-]
The production of too many mincraft results in too many cool people.
#55223 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL1OFA7LPrY so hard to watch this trayvon martin trial, she's an autist. The fact that she was even his friend deserves executioin. so cringy

i've honestly never seen someone so retarded, only in murica
User avatar #55290 to #55277 - lulzforhiroshima (01/09/2014) [-]
i dont get the point of the jew...
User avatar #55291 to #55290 - pebar ONLINE (01/09/2014) [-]
lawyer, takes retarded case just for profit, doesn't care about morality
User avatar #55241 to #55240 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
ohhhh god thats digusting
User avatar #55228 to #55223 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
i cant understand what she's saying, is this secret negro languege?

"i had told you, i do not watch news!"
User avatar #55273 to #55228 - undeadwill (01/09/2014) [-]
User avatar #55225 to #55223 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
"wut you say?" - her like every minute
User avatar #55215 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
Anyone wanna debate why free healthcare is bad? Or is worse then other systems in theiropinion?
User avatar #55220 to #55215 - akkere (01/08/2014) [-]
I think it mostly boils down to execution and initiation of the systems. Like, the current system we've employed now here in the US is awful for being financially unreliable and mostly designed as an attempt to pander to insurance companies (probably because lobbying), rather than create a legitimately effective system. Instead of single-payer, we got some kind of diseased wretch that needs to be refined and reformed if we ever want to have something viable.

Though I think one major complaint with free healthcare is the waiting lists. I'm not sure if other healthcare systems like in Australia have had this problem, but I have heard it was something that was prevalent in Canada as a result of payment management through the system, but I'm not entirely knowledgable on either nation's healthcare system.
User avatar #55224 to #55220 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
"Though I think one major complaint with free healthcare is the waiting lists"

waiting list? can you clarify
User avatar #55226 to #55224 - akkere (01/08/2014) [-]
Like I said, I'm not 100% knowledgable so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on this.
I've read posts about how for more severe injuries, such as surgical operations or cancer treatments, a patient may need to wait weeks for their operation as a result of some kind of queue from demand.
I'm not sure how severe of an issue that would be, because I'd assume something like operations and cancer treatment would require a level of urgency.
User avatar #55227 to #55226 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
uhmm i have never heard of that so i'd have too call bullshit till you find me evidense.

If you come into a hospital or whatever with a your feelings hurt or some minor injury, you'll sadly have to wait and i will agree its usually long. However if its an emergency, they take you in right away. I don't have knowledge on waiting lists for operations but i woudn't assume a patient has to wait weeks just because its a "free" health care system. if its true its probably due to an influx of people needing it compared to the number of doctors.

however the goods of it being costless greatly doesn't compare to having to spend thousands of dollars on it even when you cant afford it
User avatar #55230 to #55227 - akkere (01/08/2014) [-]
It seems like urgent operations are tended to immediately (life threatening, emergencies, etc.) like you described, whereas operations that aren't 100% necessary but might still be desired (back surgery, transplanting knee plates, etc.) in order to tend to supply/demand cases.

That's the only real problem I thought the Canadian healthcare system/healthcare systems in general had, which doesn't seem to be a problem after all, and more a necessary perquisite.
User avatar #55232 to #55230 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
Yep, however i don't think its greatly related to the fact that its free.

it still however beats the american health care. if their are rich people who want the best surgeons/doctors, they can always go to another country like america to pay for the "best" surgeons.
User avatar #55216 to #55215 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
Everything can be good or bad, depends on the leader, race and culture and if they smoke weed every day .
User avatar #55282 to #55193 - Shiny (01/09/2014) [-]
This gives the "lies, damned lies and statistics" line so much more meaning.
User avatar #55213 to #55193 - undeadwill (01/08/2014) [-]
#55195 to #55193 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
Do you have any of the statistics stated in the pic in larger format?
#55293 to #55203 - kanadetenshi (01/10/2014) [-]
Well in their defense, a white guy trying to assault a black woman is pretty much equivalent to suicide.
User avatar #55296 to #55293 - schnizel (01/10/2014) [-]
True. Black womyn as scary.
User avatar #55274 to #55203 - loomiss ONLINE (01/09/2014) [-]
What is the amount of rapes of black men on black women?
User avatar #55275 to #55274 - schnizel (01/09/2014) [-]
Black girls don't snitch.
wink wink
User avatar #55229 to #55203 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
this makes me mad
#55205 to #55202 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
I said that was in the pic obove.
I don't need shit i already have saved.
User avatar #55207 to #55205 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
#55208 to #55207 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
#55209 to #55208 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
He's a mudslim.

What did you expect?
User avatar #55210 to #55209 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
nigga fug you
User avatar #55231 to #55200 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
Maybe its because jewish people are actually smart and well educated????
did you ever think of that, and do to their constant horrific oppression under the tsars that communism was better to the blind early-20th century eye, especially the judan.
User avatar #55236 to #55231 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
ashkenazi master race highest iq's
#55234 to #55231 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
With jews you lose    
What kind of jew are you
With jews you lose
What kind of jew are you
User avatar #55235 to #55234 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
ashkenazi, not that i follow anything or believe in it like i have always said.
User avatar #55489 to #55235 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
>inferior genes
User avatar #55490 to #55489 - lulzforhiroshima (01/14/2014) [-]
Jews, stereotyped for being intelligent and having power.
Less then 0.1% of the world population, rules the world
Gets a complete disportionate number of nobel prizes like what, 20-25% of the sciences, math, ect... compared to any other population, completely different in ratio.
User avatar #55492 to #55490 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
Eh, some. IQ is still bogus. So gg no re.
Also complete bogus.
I don't think it's that much.
I'd still be dumb as a brick and not get any horrible rheumatological disorders as you jews do though, so I win.
User avatar #55491 to #55490 - lulzforhiroshima (01/14/2014) [-]
Jews are master race therefore, your argument is invalid
User avatar #55493 to #55491 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
Jews are not fucking master race.

Why do you think they got gassed?
User avatar #55494 to #55493 - lulzforhiroshima (01/14/2014) [-]
"your argument is invalid"
User avatar #55501 to #55494 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
I respond all I want, it's up to you to ignore them.

And you're the one who goes "Lolol u 'made' (showing off your ''superior jewish intelligence'' with your awesome grammar skills"
User avatar #55495 to #55494 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
bad trole
User avatar #55496 to #55495 - lulzforhiroshima (01/14/2014) [-]
you don't even use valid arguments, "why do you think they got gassed", its like you think your making me angry when really its just a minor annoyance, this is why i dont talk to you so pls stop replying to all my posts. thank you.
User avatar #55498 to #55496 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
Also, the reasons that you guys get into private schools is just because you have money.
User avatar #55497 to #55496 - revengeforfreeze (01/14/2014) [-]
But I did make a valid argument, as opposed to what you did.

They get horrible rheumatological disorders, especially ashkenazi. The jews are nothing 'master race', there were no jews involved in the renaissance. Avicenna, is he a jew? No. Exactly. He was Persian.

You saying they are master race is just invalid bs. You didnt even back up any of the claims
check this for example.

They got gassed because they don't have blue eyes, and blonde hair which is the most beautiful thing, not giant noses and blackish brown hair or whatever
User avatar #55237 to #55235 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
Well atleast you are not sandjew. IQ plz
User avatar #55238 to #55237 - lulzforhiroshima (01/08/2014) [-]
yeah they suck because they have lived so long with the arabs in the sandbox, made them permenantly stupid
User avatar #55239 to #55238 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
Arebs ar semits 2
But I won't eleiminate the ask-e-nazis
I need them for financial stuff and shit to fuck over the aliens.
User avatar #55217 to #55200 - jewishcommunazi (01/08/2014) [-]
Yeah, I guess marxism is totally a zionist conspiracy that wants jews to benefit over all the other people.

“The real work is done by the Jews, and can only be done by them, as they monopolize the machinery of the loanmongering mysteries by concentrating their energies upon the barter trade in securities. Here and there and everywhere that a little capital courts investment, there is ever one of these little Jews ready to make a little suggestion or place a little bit of a loan. The smartest highwayman in the Abruzzi is not better posted up about the locale of the hard cash in a traveler’s valise or pocket than those Jews about any loose capital in the hands of a trader. The language spoken smells strongly of Babel, and the perfume which otherwise pervades the place is by no means of a choice kind."

“The fact that 1,855 years ago Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers of our age, enlisted on the side of tyranny, again happen to be Jews is perhaps no more than a historic coincidence."

“Thus do these loans, which are a curse to the people, a ruin to the holders, and a danger to the governments, become a blessing to the houses of the children of Judah."

“This Jew organization of loan-mongers is as dangerous to the people as the aristocratic organization of landowners."

-All the quotes from the jewish Marx guy.

Also, this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Zionist_Committee_of_the_Soviet_Public
#55218 to #55217 - schnizel (01/08/2014) [-]
Shut   it   down
Shut it down
User avatar #55219 to #55218 - jewishcommunazi (01/08/2014) [-]
[Rubs hands and counts money internally].
#55221 to #55197 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
Rhodesia 1976

RIP Rhodesia.
User avatar #55191 - feelythefeel (01/08/2014) [-]
So I was watching TV, and this advertisement for Honey Boo-Boo comes up. For a few seconds, I saw her eating a pie. It was a fucking mess. That, combined with the fact that the pie was a dark red, runny mess of a pie literally made it look like she had just finished hunting down a fresh kill in the Savannah. It was only on for a few flash seconds, so for a bit it didn't at all register with me that it was pie. I might not have noticed if the song at the time wasn't saying some country crap about "Getting a piece of the pie".

And for the little while that I thought she might have hunted down and eaten somebody, I hadn't put it past her her once. Am I a bad person?
#55185 - anon (01/08/2014) [-]
Happy Birthday, Kim Jong Un.
 Friends (0)