Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (1): youregaylol, anonymous(22).
Anonymous comments allowed.
123 comments displayed.
#92368 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Questions I have for you guys. Something I've been thinking about a lot:

1. Do you think #BlackLivesMatter is a hate group against whites? I sure think it is. It's no different than Occupy Wall St., a hate group against successful people and capitalism.

2. Is there a reason for men to get married? There is no incentive for it. Women cheat, they divorce, they take your kids, alimony, and retirement (I can confirm this because I now work in Pensions). The divorce rate is very high for the newer generations, so why should men take a big risk?
#92458 to #92368 - kokanum
Reply 0
(08/25/2015) [-]
1. It's surprisingly going strong, but obviously not strong enough since they lost support from recent advocates

2. There's no reason for marriage in general, but the means for assets then I do believe so; and there literally is every means to get married if there are such problems called "Fraud" dealing with marriage.
#92420 to #92368 - theism
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
1. They're not a hate group but a number of racists flocked to the movement assuming it would support them.

2. Going into a relationship assuming your partner will cheat is a sure-fire way to kill the relationship. The divorce rate is so high because people make the impulsive decision to marry when they aren't mentally prepared or they don't know the person well enough to have a successful marriage.
#92413 to #92368 - dehumanizer
Reply +1
(08/24/2015) [-]
1 i think black lives dont matter

2 litteraly no
#92407 to #92368 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
1. BLM is like Gamergate, Tea Party or Occupy. They're not a centralized group with rules on how to behave but a decentralized group of individuals who share a mutual goal. Just because there are some black supremacists, looters and thugs associating the the hashtag doesn't mean it's a hate group overall. That said there are certain elements in it.

2. There's no benefit for men to marry in this society, not because women are evil or something, but because the court is to bias in favor of women for men to take the risk.
#92405 to #92368 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
1. Like them or not, to claim either to be a hate group shows a really ridiculous victim complex.

2. "Is there a reason for women to get married? There is no incentive for it. Men cheat, they divorce, they take your kids, alimony, and retirement. The divorce rate is very high for the newer generations, so why should women take a big risk?"

You don't think about the deterioration of the relationship, that happens later on. I guess people do have expectations too high for the future of their relationship. Personally, I probably wouldn't marry. Also, I think marriage is seen as proof of love and if you don't want to marry, your partner will doubt of the love you have for him/her.
#92401 to #92368 - akkere
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
1. The core group of BlackLivesMatter definitely holds hate group sentiments towards whites, even the ones that come out to support them. It doesn't necessarily mean that all supporters of the hashtag and the general idea hate whites, but the core group that runs the gatherings has proven to be toxic inside and out.

2. In the grand scheme of things, no, there isn't a great deal of relative incentive to put time and effort into a marriage and subsequently a family and instead either maintain small but less damaging relationships or simply remain single but overall having time focused on developing your career or personal health. There are a lot of flaws that linger with marriages nowadays that add up and easily explain why they end up failing, stuff like differentiating careers ( with factors ranging from around income, to demand of change in location and time ), lack of time shared for the relationship that the marriage requires, and so on. Factors that generally are allowed to exist because a marriage came "too early" in someone's life. Those who are married more tactfully will generally lead happier lifestyles and have a better sense of fulfillment, but an early marriage without having much of a chance to know your partner or have an idea where your life will be going will end up to a lot of problems down the line.
In any case, you should make the effort to know your partner rather than give up trust so easily. If you're really that afraid of a venomous divorce, work out a prenuptial agreement.
#92436 to #92401 - akkere
Reply 0
(08/25/2015) [-]
>>#92402
Why do you keep deleting your comments and make it super inconvenient to reply?
If you're referring to Rachael Dolezal who was the head of the NAACP by disguising herself as being black, she got massively ridiculed by the black community a great deal when it came out. I think I remember hearing BLM protesters chanting about it being a white conspiracy on a few of those (rather annoyingly organized) montage videos.
#92437 to #92436 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/25/2015) [-]
"Why do you keep deleting your comments and make it super inconvenient to reply?"
Usually it's because of typos and then I write new ones. In this case it was because I was only read your first sentence and didn't bother to read the rest so I refrained from commenting altogether because of the information I might've missed in the rest of the comment.

Regardless, she still retained a lot of support from what I was told. Despite being ridiculed, her work was appreciated at the same time. At least that's how I remember it.
#92402 to #92401 - jewishcommunazi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#92377 to #92368 - flintanimoargon
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
1) If BLM is anything like OWS, it'll probably be dead and buried by the end of this year. Otherwise, I've paid little attention to it.
2) There's always going to be brave (or stupid, depending on your view) souls who believe they'll be the exception, and that their marriage will be years of happiness rather than misery. I can't say much else, since my bloodline is apparently cursed when it comes to matrimony and thus it'd be a terrible idea for me to marry.
#92372 to #92368 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
uhh yes the decline of western civilization through the degeneration of civilized, western culture.

whats new?
#92362 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
i.imgur.com/kPDiIMF.png

Looks like i am about to fuck some peoples life now.
#92358 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
This is what goes on in the back of the minds of "minorities"

The majority of the ones on television wont say it, but this is exactly what they think and hope for.

When we finally do become a minority, our children and grandchildren will pay the price for our ignorance.
#92360 to #92358 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
You'll show them all one day though, won't you?
#92373 to #92360 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
What a brilliant counter-argument.

I'm surprised you would thumb this up akkere.
#92385 to #92373 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
It wasn't a counter-argument. Shitposts like this aren't worth a counter-argument.

I selected a random comment from a random person and acted like it's the overwhelming mentality driving a large group of people. Just like the OP.

#92393 to #92385 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
>everything that makes me mad is a shitpost
#92396 to #92393 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
>Unsourced comment from an unknown writer
>Taken as evidence of a wider mentality among racial and ethnic minority groups

Quality post, friend.
#92397 to #92396 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Do you know what an example is.

I could have easily just typed up something myself, this comment just came straight from a likely dindu and it summed it up pretty well.

Anything else you thought was in my comment is on you kiddo.
#92386 to #92385 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
implying this isnt true
implying minorities aren't stupid enough to understand this
implying immigrants and minorities dont hope for this

Ignoring basic sociology I see.
#92387 to #92386 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Implying reactionaries haven't been wrong about this before.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Italianism#Anti-Italianism_in_the_United_States
#92388 to #92387 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
>this country had immigrants come before that were treated poorly and everything worked out fine
>thus we should bring in as many as we want and not worry about it
#92389 to #92388 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
>In the past people believed that immigrant cultures would overshadow and dominant over Anglo-American culture.
>People actually believed that Italian could become a second language.
>There was a time when there were hundreds of German language newspapers in circulation in the United States.

So, how many people do you know that were born in America who speak Italian or German as their mother tongue?
#92394 to #92389 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Can you think of any difference between thousands of european immigrants crossing an ocean to enter a country they aren't familiar with while forced to integrate by society and millions of mexican immigrants crossing a fence to enter a country which they used to own massive parts to in a society that almost encourages them not to change?

Nah, me neither
#92395 to #92394 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
There were far more than thousands of European immigrants coming into the United States at the turn of the 20th century, it was the industrial revolution. Despite the discrimination they faced, they weren't forced to integrate. Many of them lived in homogeneous neighborhoods, where they continued to keep the cultural practices of their homeland and language alive, and married within their ethnic groups. They also set up media to cater to their communities. There was a time when Russian, Polish, Italian, and especially German language newspapers were commonplace in the United States.
#92398 to #92395 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Define "forced to integrate". Just because there wasn't a law that said "integrate or else" (potential integration was a prerequisite for entry though) doesn't mean that the citizenry around them didn't pressure them into integrating.

Also it's not that hard for a european to give up their past when they're an ocean away from home in a land they know nothing about, surrounded by white people with a different culture.

It's not the same as a hispanic mexican crossing a fence and walking into a state they used to own filled with people nothing like them (unless they're near the border, which is basically mexico in all but name) in a society that doesn't require them to change in any way.

Comparing the two is intellectually dishonest.
#92390 to #92389 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
You are really fucking dense if you think this time multiculturalism will do the same.

Well I really hope you are right, I really do.
#92364 to #92360 - theism
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
The mental gymnastics are hilarious.
#92361 to #92360 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
I wont have to show you anything, when it happens it will be all too clear, and you'll only have yourself to blame
#92357 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
#92383 to #92357 - pebar
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
better dead than red
#92404 to #92383 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
I'm calling the KFC secret police on you.
#92374 to #92357 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
thank mr. fellow jew
#92375 to #92374 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
That's not what you're supposed to say, you just ruined everything! No full communism for you, mister!
#92376 to #92375 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply +1
(08/24/2015) [-]
Listen up goyim. Karl is my nigga, he will have you sent to siberi if you don't shut up.
#92379 to #92376 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Nuh huh, he was my nigga before he was your nigga.
#92380 to #92379 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
>became your nigga decades after being born
>Was my nigga when conceived
#92381 to #92380 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
Oh yeah? Then how many communisms have you built?
#92382 to #92381 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
My parents and their parents before and their parents before lived in the USSR. I am inherently Jon, Builder of Communism. I get +50 communism points just for being Jewish too.

And again, Karl was my nigga when conceived by default for being Jude regardless of how many communisms I built. Ashkenazis unite.
#92352 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
IF any goyim want me to see someone you know uses Ashley Madison or you doubt him/her using it. give me the e-mail address and will search if they exist in there or now.
#92342 - shekelnator
Reply +2
(08/23/2015) [-]
HEY byposted. gib the link about jew anon who stole a bank!
#92400 to #92370 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
some detective is about to be filled with money now

but thats cool m8!
#92369 to #92342 - byposted
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#92353 to #92342 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
I thought jews were supposed to own the banks, not steal them.
#92355 to #92353 - shekelnator
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
no goy! this time a JEW stole a bank!.
#92297 - victorytoaster
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
what if Trump wins?
#92336 to #92297 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
America will show China what a real great wall looks like.
#92293 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Bernie Sanders: the NSA is stealing our dank memes
#Sandman2016
#92294 to #92293 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Why are you still a commie?
#92296 to #92294 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
Richard Dawkins goes full communist
I believe in a workers' system because it has potential to progress without the need to subjugate other nations. And it can actually defy burgeois power as opposed to liberal democracy. I don't talk much about communism because it's not gonna happen in my lifetime and it's possible that it never happens since it requires that many enough nations are socialist and/or support communism so I just focus on socialism.
#92298 to #92296 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>I believe in a workers' system because it has potential to progress without the need to subjugate other nations.
But yet it doesn't and yet you do.
>And it can actually defy burgeois power as opposed to liberal democracy.
Switching their 1% with your 1%.
#92299 to #92298 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
"But yet it doesn't and yet you do."
It has the potential. Attempting to subjugate other nations brought no benefits and was a stupid move (Kruschev's external policy).

"Switching their 1% with your 1%."
Members of poliburos, central commitees, etc. in socialist states usually have unprivileged/working class backgrounds.
#92300 to #92299 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>It has the potential. Attempting to subjugate other nations brought no benefits and was a stupid move (Kruschev's external policy).
We will leave you alone goyim good comrades ;).
Signed- Zdaljin
>Members of poliburos, central commitees, etc. in socialist states usually have unprivileged/working class backgrounds.
So, what I just said.
#92301 to #92300 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
Stalin promoted autonomy to Soviet republics and aided the chinese revolution while at the same time not trying to enforce policies. Stalin told Mao to make a temporary alliance with the KMT instead of going all civil war. Mao refused this and did his thing. Stalin did nothing and after the whole thing he told Mao he should've let him just do his thing.

Okay, but you don't put term limits on the 1%, you can be part of the 1% just by having dead 1% parents and an inheritance and you can't have the 1% gulag'd for being corrupt.
#92302 to #92301 - schnizel
Reply -1
(08/23/2015) [-]
It's not like the man did the same thing in Russia, also
Intentions=/=Actions
Also, I believe the just and responsible handling of government duties have been proven to be the weakness of the communists. Just like running away from street fights.
#92303 to #92302 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
"It's not like the man did the same thing in Russia, also
Intentions=/=Actions"
So Russia would be autonomous from... Russia?
In this case, I believe they're connected.

"Also, I believe the just and responsible handling of government duties have been proven to be the weakness of the communists. Just like running away from street fights."
How so?
#92304 to #92303 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
So Russians could be safe from communists.
>How so?
The SSSR collapsed in on itself and the only thing holding it together was brutality.
#92306 to #92304 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
"The SSSR collapsed in on itself and the only thing holding it together was brutality."
As seen in The Black Book of Communismâ„¢.

The reason the USSR failed is because it was weakened by inefficient political and economic reforms. Gorbachov went even further and tried to replace Marxist-Leninist ideology with some sort of social democracy. China introduced political and economic reforms much more efficiently and remains a world power and is the second largest economy in the world.
#92308 to #92306 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
It would be laughably easy for a modern western military to defeat the chinese, the only outcome that could give them a Pyrrhic victory is to introduce a nuclear holocaust.

Notice I'm just saying a modern western military, if we're just talking about the US the chinese would be obliterated.

The US navy alone could completely neutralize the country in a year.
#92311 to #92308 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
The US could defeat them, but I doubt any other western nation could. The PLA is very modernized.
#92317 to #92311 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>The PLA is very modernized.
lel wwat
#92320 to #92317 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
It's not the greatest military there is, but it's pretty above average. And it's not like they have an aggressive foreign policy to justify focusing so much on their military.
www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/pla-v-us.htm
#92321 to #92320 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
It sucks ass.
#92307 to #92306 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Instead of proving the opposite you meme about it, bretty good gomrad. There is no point in denying the things Staljin and his goy friends did, the only matter that is to be settled is the size of the destruction they caused.

>Daily reminder that China has hardly any arable land and that it takes a lot more than it has to feed a billion hungry mouths.
Daily reminder that China imports a huge portion of its food.
Daily reminder that China can't break a naval blockade due to having a shitty navy and putting too much time and money into
>muh million man army that won't a year of warfare
Daily reminder that China relies heavily on the west to survive and thus stay relevant to any degree.
Daily reminder that China's entire economy floats on bubbles
#92309 to #92307 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
1- The burden of proof;
2- I did it some times in the past here.

>So, should they, like, kill half of their own population or something? Importing food sounds like the reasonable thing to do. They already have policies to decrease population. One child policy, strict immigration, easy emigration, chinese citizens who want to foreign citizenship have to renounce chinese citizenship, etc.
>I guess. Its mostly surrounded by land than by water though.
>I think the opposite is more true. Should they go full DPRK then? Not a good idea.
>China had a market crash recently. Well look at that. Look at how it affected the economy. Just look at it! Wow, it's fucking nothing!
#92313 to #92309 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
It's their problem, not mine. They wanted quantity over quality and this is what they got.
>>China had a market crash recently. Well look at that. Look at how it affected the economy. Just look at it!
www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/01/fears-for-chinese-economy-as-shares-fall
More bridges out of trash inbound.
#92314 to #92313 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>Comparing it to 1929
Totally not sensationalist. Either way, time will tell how it will go down.
#92310 to #92309 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
1- I meant to say I don't have the burden of proof.
#92312 to #92310 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
I know you don't, I did.
Buy it an read it:
www.amazon.com/The-Black-Book-Communism-Repression
#92315 to #92312 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
The authors ended up admitting how much of a bad job they did and were forced to print a retraction. They said they would release a new "version" but so far it hasn't come.
#92316 to #92315 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Damage control much, you don't care about prosperity or well being, only experimenting on a broken prototype and blaming muh humyn nature on it.
#92318 to #92316 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
I'm not the one complaining about the supposed "human nature", that's what you people use to discredit socialism (it doesn't work because something something human nature and that stuff).
I guess lifting poor and backwards countries into economic world powers and successfully fighting inflation isn't prosperity. Close to zero unemployment, controlling prices of food so that the poorest can afford it, building housing for the poorest, free healthcare, free education, etc. isn't well being.
#92324 to #92322 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +2
(08/23/2015) [-]
When farms were collectivized, most peasants accepted it and weren't harmed by it. The ones who didn't accept it were the kulaks, who most of the time, were given the land by the Tzar and ran them through wage labour from peasants who did the work. Harvest wasn't wasted, it was exported to pursuit rapid industrialization, which would later give the USSR a much better chance in WWII. Exportation decreased when famines striked. Jews Billionaires made deals with the USSR when it was of benefit to them. After all, that's the greed of human nature. It was very limited though and the only capitalist corporation I'm aware of making business with Stalinist USSR was Ford for some reason. Differences in wealth existed. Moscow was more prosperous as it has historically been. Many people even had dachas. That's a luxury by modern standards. Rural parts were poorer.

Not sure what the healthcare in the USSR achieved, aside from introducing abortion, but Cuba, that little third world country that just got out of an embargo, has achieved a lot (you hear people talking about the cuban healthcare, and it's not just because it's free).
www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-09/cuba-releases-worlds-first-lung-cancer-vaccine
Then again, it's not very surprising that the country of cigars is the one that tries to fix lung cancer. By the way, cool voice, my sand nigger illyrian friend.
#92351 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>>#92350
Mostly underground, but not entirely.
#92350 to #92324 - schnizel
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
ye that 1
I understand why they kept it underground
#92349 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>>#92348
It's the moscow metro.
#92348 to #92324 - schnizel
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Is that from the subway?
#92345 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
+1
(08/23/2015) [-]
>>#92335
During Stalinism it might've looked like shit, but they had different priorities then. From the 1950's onwards it looked pretty cool. Soviet architecture was not on par with orthodox, which was amazing, but it was pretty good.
#92335 to #92324 - schnizel
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Yes, Staljin had an orthodox fetish, but what have you done to turn the city of art into a slum? A lot, but what have you done to turn a city of slum into art, nothing?
#92334 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Fuck, I meant >>#92325.
#92333 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#92332 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>>#92319

Although the bolsheviks attacked what they perceived as burgeois culture at the beginning of the revolution, some of it was restored during Stalinism, especially after WWII. For example, orthodox churches destroyed after the war were rebuilt and Stalin praised a few Tzarist-era war generals or war heroes, I don't remember.

About the wasted harvest I'll see what I can find.
#92328 to #92324 - jewishcommunazi
0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>>#92319
The dachas thing was like in the 1960's and 1970's or something, which I admit was at the peak of the USSR's prosperity. The stalinist era wasn't very prosperous. The country was still affected by the civil war when he came to power (the bolsheviks are in part responsible for it, but you can't make scrambled eggs without ruining an omelette). And the rule of Stalin focused on rapid industrialization and national defense. Although standards of living improved greatly under Stalin, it was certainly nothing to envy.
#92319 to #92318 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
In fact, well-being deteriorated after the fall of the eastern bloc in most cases.
#92287 - pebar
Reply +9
(08/23/2015) [-]
heh
#92286 - pebar
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
www.campusreform.org/?ID=6749

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

liberals aren't even hiding it any more
#92289 to #92286 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
We know pebsy, join us and remove judaism from the premises.
#92359 to #92289 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
You probably aren't too fond of free speech either.
#92403 to #92359 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/24/2015) [-]
I like free speech, that's why I rustle jewish jimmies daily.
#92282 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
/Bernie+not+playing+the+media+s+game/funny-pictures/5659244/

this meme just wont die

i feel as if arguing against the swarm of idiots doesn't matter, they either can't comprehend the truth or they just dont want to listen

a bit disheartening really, but meh, what can one person do
#92305 to #92295 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>The Nazis had the name but were a fascist regime.
#92285 to #92282 - pebar
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
the comments are worse than ever......
#92283 to #92282 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Your wrong, and to stupid to see it.
#92278 - anon
Reply -1
(08/23/2015) [-]
#92281 to #92278 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
This corporate kike sucks
#92276 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
>2015
>Not a Posadist

You people make me sick.
#92290 to #92276 - schnizel
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
The fuck is that?
#92291 to #92290 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
Socialism will emerge from the ashes of a world that was ridden with nuclear warfare. If aliens come visit our planet, they will help us build our society, provided they're very advanced and therefore they have already reached something similar to socialism or communism and will lead us to it.
Posadism explained
#92292 to #92291 - schnizel
Reply +1
(08/23/2015) [-]
ayy lmao
#92277 to #92276 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
I though you didn't like Trotskyism.
#92279 to #92277 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
But this kind of trotskyism is something out of this world.
#92275 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
So, the Greeks are going to the polls again.
#92280 to #92275 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
The entire fucking Greek thing has turned into a shitshow and none of the parties make sense whatsoever.

Snap elections won't help, because these are the parties you can choose from:

- Pro-bailout parties that want mine and other European countries to send more fucking money to them but are at least moderate and sensible in their economic policies.
- Anti-bailout parties that while at least don't want other countries to bail them out even more are incredibly radical and extremist. Neo-nazis and Communist? Seriously?
- Oh and of course that filthy little rat Tsipras who praised himself of being anti-bailout and then ended up supporting the third and biggest bailout deal.

New Democracy was the only sensible party with responsible budget cuts and opposing the first bailout. But since then they've become pro-bailout too. Where's the party that promotes fiscal responsibility dammit!

My fucking countries very own congress was being threatened by a no-confidence vote because the Prime Minister almost broke his promise of supporting this third bailout meaning this entire bailout deal nearly collapsed the government in my own country. FUCK GREECE!
#92274 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
If ur dick is cut ur a kike and trader to the white race
#92270 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
Only true kikes get cercumsized
#92269 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
If your dick is cut you are a kike
#92262 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
War is shit
#92256 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
Nationalism started ww1
#92259 to #92256 - cantstumpthetrump
Reply -1
(08/22/2015) [-]
evil started ww1
aggression started ww1
weapons started ww1
countries started ww1
people started ww1
reality started ww1

noice logic m80
#92273 to #92259 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
Kike please go
#92258 to #92256 - rabbithabbit
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
Explain pls?
#92260 to #92258 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
When ww1 started people chanted "war" in the streets. They wanted war with other countries.
#92271 to #92260 - rabbithabbit
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
The assassin who killed Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian empire, was a Bosnian Serb who was butthurt that Austria-Hungary took over Bosnia. I see why Nationalism would be a factor but it couldn't of start WW1 on it's own. So I guess you could say it was terrorism that started it.

I'm not exactly the best at European History but that's how I think it happened.
#92272 to #92271 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2015) [-]
The terrorist was a nationalist
#92288 to #92272 - rabbithabbit
Reply 0
(08/23/2015) [-]
Nah, all he wanted was for Bosnia to be free. That isn't nationalism.