Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #20160 - colcrockett (01/02/2013) [-]
No, we really should not, It would be folly to do so.
#20156 - moser (01/02/2013) [-]
MFW gun nuts don't understand the difference between wanting more effective gun control laws and wanting to ban all guns.   
The only one who ever said they wanted a full ban on guns was magical fairy princess so calm your tits.
MFW gun nuts don't understand the difference between wanting more effective gun control laws and wanting to ban all guns.

The only one who ever said they wanted a full ban on guns was magical fairy princess so calm your tits.
User avatar #20147 - ungluedflyer (01/02/2013) [-]
Funnyjunk seems to be made up of more Democratic valued people. Am I wrong for thinking so?
User avatar #20145 - mrfourtysevenman (01/02/2013) [-]
guns are cool. its the only thing we have that japan doesnt
#20153 to #20145 - ravyen (01/02/2013) [-]
Besides average-sized meatswords.
User avatar #20184 to #20153 - mrfourtysevenman (01/02/2013) [-]
you sly sonovabich
User avatar #20144 - mrfourtysevenman (01/02/2013) [-]
if they ban guns im gonna own one anyway.
if a nigga tries to break into my house i will shoot him
if the cops ask why the nigga got a bullet in him
ill just say he shot him self by accident while i was beating the shit out of him
#20135 - brohio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20129 - creamNscream (01/02/2013) [-]
Guns are the reason why the world is evil, we need to ban every type of gun ever so we can stop violence! Come on people, it's simple logic!
User avatar #20157 to #20129 - JwBread (01/02/2013) [-]
Then people will just use different weapons, simple as.
Here in the UK, guns are pretty hard to get hold of, and gun crimes are almost unheard of, yet knife crimes are somewhat high. I'm sure that if we could get guns as easily over here, then there would be a lot of gun crime too.
User avatar #20161 to #20157 - creamNscream (01/02/2013) [-]
Ban them too! It's simple!
User avatar #20166 to #20161 - JwBread (01/02/2013) [-]
So you're somehow going to ban knives?
So everyone in the world is going to have to somehow use something other than a knife in and around the kitchen?
User avatar #20170 to #20166 - creamNscream (01/02/2013) [-]
God gave us finger nails for a reason
User avatar #20172 to #20170 - JwBread (01/02/2013) [-]
That is probably the worst...
just, wow...
#20190 to #20172 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
He's obviously joking, weirdo.
User avatar #20154 to #20129 - ungluedflyer (01/02/2013) [-]
I know it's simple logic, but if we're honest, the world doesn't work off of simple logic. How else should we protect ourselves? You can't remove every gun from existence. If you take away firearms from the ones who abide by the law and turn them in, do you really think criminals will do the same thing? Abolition just repeats itself. When alcohol was banned it didn't stop people, they made their own. What about the years of heritage and tradition behind gun owners? Self protection aside, what about the people that love guns for the sake of loving their past traditions? My family has grown up around hunting and sporting activities like target shooting. It really means a lot to us.
User avatar #20159 to #20154 - creamNscream (01/02/2013) [-]
Traditions are dumb, it's all just blind following of what your dumbass elders did.

And how dare people kill defensless animals, they don't deserve death, much less to a selfish gun owner.
User avatar #20132 to #20129 - cardanbar (01/02/2013) [-]
guns r bad and ppl whoo uuse guns shud fele bad
#20118 - arhinoinyourcar **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#20114 - zzonked (01/02/2013) [-]
If they banned porn I would get so much done and probably become really powerful and rich.   
Then I can use my money and influence to unban porn.
If they banned porn I would get so much done and probably become really powerful and rich.

Then I can use my money and influence to unban porn.
#20108 - megatrondecepticon (01/02/2013) [-]
Might move to Canada or Mexico incase America gets really fucked over.
User avatar #20095 - ffx (01/02/2013) [-]
Yes, let's ban guns because we're already doing a great job on the ban of cocaine and other drugs.
#20089 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
politics is boring!!!!!!!!1why is there a board abou8t is stupid
#20080 - banmeifyoucan **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20074 - zukowashere (01/02/2013) [-]
Yes, but give us all tanks in return.
User avatar #20072 - nitsuan (01/02/2013) [-]
I said it once and I shall say it again. Banning guns will be a disaster. If we could not pull prohibition off what makes you think we can get away with banning guns?
#20122 to #20072 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
Well, if you wanted a drink you could make your own wine prison style in the toilet. If you want a gun, it is much more difficult to make yourself. So it would technically be easier to limit the availability of guns than it was alcohol.
User avatar #20078 to #20072 - drastronomy ONLINE (01/02/2013) [-]
a lot of european countries have banned guns

they are not suffering
#20136 to #20078 - lordaurion (01/02/2013) [-]
No European country has 2 guns for every citizen. The US does and that's only wwhat we have on record. There's probably 100 million more the government knows noting about. It will be impossible to confiscate them all. Keep in mind that's nearly half a billion firearms.
User avatar #20094 to #20078 - ffx (01/02/2013) [-]
Not going to argue too much with that. Just going to say this: What works in one situation may not work in the other.
User avatar #20090 to #20078 - nitsuan (01/02/2013) [-]
Well, consider how America is obsessed with guns and then remember how we attempted to ban alcohol. We aren't really that crazy of alcohol but when we tried to ban it it only wasted billions of dollars and ended in failure so we just made it legal again. Now try it with gun. As an American, I can say we are a huge gun culture and if we aren't the biggest one out there we probably rival them. It would be like trying to take crack away from a drug addict, but on a massive scale. Europe does fine because they never had this massive gun culture like the USA does and until that addiction is broken the banning of guns will be nearby impossible not only because it will be difficult enough to get the guns from the people but because many Americans would fight back with force over an attempt to ban guns. You also have to consider what anon said about being right by a country who has an even worse problem and then are massive illegal gun market and what not.
User avatar #20069 - askafj ONLINE (01/02/2013) [-]

-41% of Americans
#20066 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
this bored is BORING!!!!!!!!!! who cars abot politics
User avatar #20051 - jbails (01/02/2013) [-]
You can't make porn illegal for the same reason you can't make cigarettes illegal. it would make millions (billions?) of people felons instantly.
#20055 to #20051 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
They amout of people who watch pron every day would make it impossible to make it illegal.
User avatar #20058 to #20055 - jbails (01/02/2013) [-]
That's my point, I love porn, the only difference would be that one day it's fine, the next day it's illegal.
User avatar #20050 - paranoidwzy (01/02/2013) [-]
Any one who want's to start a debate about the EU?
User avatar #20057 to #20050 - akg **User deleted account** (01/02/2013) [-]
Go on.

EU is a great organization that helps to develope democracy and trade partners internationally, it does however get overprotective sometimes and goes over nations heads, which is a bad thing.

A bit pissed that Norway isn't in EU.
#20077 to #20057 - drakthaal ONLINE (01/02/2013) [-]
the eu would not be good for the norwegian economy.
simple as that.
User avatar #20084 to #20077 - akg **User deleted account** (01/02/2013) [-]
It surely wouldn't destroy it or make it noticable worse for the citizen in Norway, and it would give us a chance to help build eastern Europe and invest in it to ultimately make money of it.

Plus, it's selfish not to. It's not healthy for Norway not to participate in the creation of the modern Europe.
User avatar #20093 to #20084 - paranoidwzy (01/02/2013) [-]
Norway is doing great not being in the EU. They bennefitt allot from not being governd in strazburg.
#20087 to #20084 - drakthaal ONLINE (01/02/2013) [-]
yes it would make Norway noticeably worse. Norway has the highest standard of living in the world it can not sustain it's level of social benefits and high paychecks if it had an increased amount of laborers. and Europe brought their crisis on them self with low taxes and high spending it is not Norway's job to help them. and no eastern Europe is not a beneficial market check the statistics the corruption rate is to high. Norway is one of the last socialist bastions in the world with a very high work morale required to make the system function. and norway is the country that gives the most aid per citizen in the world so claiming it's acting selfish is quite unfair. by your logic of selfishness why do not the EU invest heavily in africa?
User avatar #20098 to #20087 - akg **User deleted account** (01/02/2013) [-]
Anyone in the Schengen Area (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area) are free to travel in any other country that is also in the area, so that's not a problem.

It's not Norway's job, as it's not Germany's job to help out Greece. But Greece was and could be a great business partner in the future. It's also a nations "duty" to help out another nation in need, even if they're stubborn and borderline retarded as the greek protesters.

Norway is not a socialist country. It's a social democracy. There is an increasing privatization in the public sector, and it's practically a capitalistic country with some socialistic perks, such as free education and health care. Very high work morale? Heh, good one. I don't know if you're Norwegian or not, but there are other reasons why Norway do well.

Eastern Europe is not a beneficial market at the moment, but it could be if EU succeeded in increasing democracy in the countries with corruption problems. Then it could be an interresting marked for investments.

Norway gives a lot of aid because it can. The Good Samaritan wouldn't have been remebered if he didn't have any money. Besides, a lot of the aid to the 3rd world countries that comes from Norway is horribly misplaced and not efficient.

EU cannot invest heavily in Africa yet, as the cultures and leadership is so different. You can't give an african farmer a tractor and expect him to increase his production rate. First we have to make peace and get the dictators and corruption away, then we can invest.
#20052 to #20050 - anonymous (01/02/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)