Click to expand
Latest users (2): schnizel, youregaylol, anonymous(16).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #90892 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
Why do racists always pretend to just be fighting for their 'rights'? People act like white supremacy is just defending white people, black nationalism is just defending black people, it's just nonsense.
#90935 to #90892 - byposted (07/26/2015) [-]
I don't know why some insert "rights" into the struggle, as though their racial assertion is dependent upon the state, or the, supposedly sacrosanct, offerings of YHWH.

Is the racial right, of Whites, to avoid "flight?" Common blood is justification enough to shed some. Either they use their might, to resist, or die.

Of course, I didn't answer your question, as it was intended, and that was because lulzforXYZ conferred, to me, that you're a faggot. He wishes you would!
#90934 to #90892 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90909 to #90892 - feelythefeel (07/26/2015) [-]
It doesn't have to matter to them if they get out of our country. Or at least a country. Don't whites deserve at least one country to ourselves compared to the dozens for every other race?
User avatar #90910 to #90909 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
What countries bar entry to everyone not of a certain race?
User avatar #90912 to #90910 - feelythefeel (07/26/2015) [-]
You're taking my point to a ridiculous extreme. I'm saying that Asians are allowed to make their country as Asian as they like. Negroes are allowed to make their countries as negro as they like.

But all of the "white" countries have to be multicultural and diverse. Gee, it's almost as if there's an ulterior motive in play.
User avatar #91070 to #90912 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
Asian countries have a very high population density. Their immigration policies are strict most likely because of this. Despite that, China, which constantly fights population growth, has a relatively progressive treatment for immigrants already inside the country. There are many non-citizen immigrants that don't face deportation. And if they have children with a chinese spouse, their children may get urban household registration. China may expatriate their own former chinese citizens aswell if they acquire a different nationality.

"According to the Nationality Law, a person can acquire a Chinese nationality if he or she meets one of the following requirements:
-Is born in China and at least one parent holding Chinese nationality.
-Is born outside China and at least one parent has Chinese nationality, so long as the Chinese-national parent(s) have not settled in a foreign country.
-Is born in China and both parents are settled in China with statelessness or uncertain nationality."

"Chinese nationality is automatically lost when a person has settled abroad and pursues one of the following acts (Article 9):
-naturalizes as a citizen of another country (regardless of whether the naturalization is involuntary), or voluntarily acquires the nationality (through naturalization or registration) of another country."
#91071 to #91070 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/27/2015) [-]
Yuexiu district, Guangzhou.
User avatar #90917 to #90912 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Bullshit. Someone has to only "want diversity in white nations" or else your argument is just blatant whining. I know there's a name for this kind of bad arguing.... something about a man made of hay? I forget.

And if you really want to be "fair" about it, North America "belongs" lol borderline scare quotes to the native tribes, not Caucasians. I don't want to move to Europe just to placate a circlejerk.
User avatar #90920 to #90917 - feelythefeel (07/26/2015) [-]
1.) Please, show me the widespread demand for Japan to be multicultural, or for Israel to be diverse. I'll gladly believe that they're expecting this of anyone else when you show me the expectance of this from anyone else.
2.) Have you missed the leftist crowd's bashing of white people? It's pretty common nowadays.
3.) We conquered the land from people who weren't doing anything with it. How about we just up and leave with everything we've ever done and built? Also known as everything?
User avatar #90923 to #90920 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
1.) If you think Japan isn't criticized for its xenophobia, or Israel for its apartheid treatment of Palestinians, you are either lying or insane.
2.) Left and right wing are general classifications based on one dimension of political preference, not tangible groups like political parties. I do not care what @polygenderqueen37 said last week. You can find any idiot online and scapegoat them by association as some group you dislike.
3.) Because races and ethnicities are not homogenous groups in some unspoken competition for supremacy. No race has ever done anything, people have, and you are not entitled to their achievements, nor are you responsible for their transgressions. People that take pride in their race lack any achievements of their own. Aside from mass murderers, anyway.
User avatar #90915 to #90912 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
Pretty sure if asian countries and african countries started declaring themselves solely asian and 'negro' countries the same people complaining about European xenophobia would be unhappy with them. What people have a problem with typically isn't white countries having their own cultural identity, it's when they start excluding other cultures and repressing cultural expression.
User avatar #90918 to #90915 - feelythefeel (07/26/2015) [-]
1.) Again, you're taking it to an extreme. Those other countries don't have to be multicultural or diverse. Nobody expects them to. It's why so many Japanese are redpilled as fuck, because the world lets them be. But suddenly with white countries, we're obligated to have open borders and all of that. Why?
2.) Plenty of countries do that every day. South Africans and Zimbabweans have practically committed minor acts of genocide against native white populations. Nobody cares. Not a one. North Korea is the most racially homogeneous nation on Earth. Never on the discussion agenda.
3.) If that's what people are angry about, where's the uproar over the Chinese repression of Muslim minorities? Or the Buddhist genocide of those same minorities? It's because they aren't held to the same misguided standard white people are.
User avatar #90924 to #90918 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
You know that Japan has a Communist Party, right? One with 32 total seats in the Diet? And is older than every other modern Japanese party?
User avatar #90919 to #90918 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
1. Japan isn't on the world stage as an immigration destination. People do complain about Japanese xenophobia, they're just in Japan.
2. Same situation, they're not in the spotlight so they don't get discussed. How many complaints do you here about xenophobia in fucking poland and belarus?
3. Same argument again. Add to that china is really good at covering that shit up.
User avatar #90921 to #90919 - feelythefeel (07/26/2015) [-]
I don't have time for a debate. I'd continue, but I have to go.
User avatar #90922 to #90921 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
You feel like picking it up just reply then.
User avatar #90901 to #90892 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Persecutory delusions exacerbated by projection bias, that is to say, they think everyone is as much of a wang as them.
User avatar #90902 to #90901 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
Fuckin stormfront thinks their doing anyone any good.
User avatar #90906 to #90902 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
I doubt their concept of "good" is universal. A narcissistic tyrant believes god is on his side because, well, he's just better than everyone else.

Having biases is part of being a flawed human being, but being an asshole is a choice.
#90897 to #90892 - anon (07/26/2015) [-]
Considering how much black people and feminists fight for their rights, they must be racist as fug.
User avatar #90903 to #90897 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
The best part of the comic on the left is the /pol/ edit replacing blacks with Jews in an attempt to refute the argument... even though Jews were also considered mentally inferior in IQ's infancy, same with the Irish.

User avatar #90945 to #90903 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
If they can handle money, they aren't stupid.
User avatar #90899 to #90897 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
That comics still bullshit though. It's accounting for a statistical difference in performance on iq tests, I wonder how russian iq scores compare to the scores of a country with a less oppressive history.
User avatar #90946 to #90899 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
> less oppressive history
> implying oppression is bad
User avatar #90947 to #90946 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
Generally it is yeah.
User avatar #90948 to #90947 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
Hard times breed hard men.
User avatar #90949 to #90948 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
That's bullshit and you know it.
User avatar #90951 to #90949 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
No, no it isn't. How would a Spartan, who has been treated like a piece of cannon fodder, training every day since the age of 4 do in a fight against a christian monk whos hardest task was milking a goat?
User avatar #90952 to #90951 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
>Because that's an intelligent measure of the quality of a society.

How would that same spartan do in a fight against a us marine, even one straight out of training?
User avatar #90953 to #90952 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
Natural selection, the strong will survive while the weak die of. And the harder the conditions the better the quality. After all, it takes a lot of pressure to make a diamond.
Also, Spartans were big guys, who crashed Persian lines without survivors. So yeah, go Supurdia.
User avatar #90954 to #90953 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
Obviously you live in a fantasy world. Natural selection hasn't applied to humans for millenia.
User avatar #90956 to #90954 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
Do you want to skype about this because I'm in the mood for some vidya.
User avatar #90955 to #90954 - schnizel ONLINE (07/26/2015) [-]
We will talk after breakfast.
#90900 to #90899 - anon (07/26/2015) [-]
> It's accounting for a statistical difference in performance on iq tests

Glad you agree with me, shitlord : DDDD
User avatar #90895 to #90892 - mixednuts (07/26/2015) [-]
Likely because of the stigma around the words "racist" and "separatist". It's difficult today to try and get someone to embrace outright racism. They try to convince themselves and others that their people are under attack and that what other people call "racism" is just fighting back.
User avatar #90904 to #90895 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Not necessarily, retards like Bob Whitaker also try to redefine words in an attempt to poison the well before anyone tries to bring someone quoting "The Mantra" or some whiny straw man copypasta to their senses.

Anti-racist is code for anti-white. Anti-racist means racist. Hurrhurr.
User avatar #90896 to #90895 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
The end result is nobody will take actual racial advocacy seriously if all they know is racist propaganda disguised as advocacy.
#90893 to #90892 - anon (07/26/2015) [-]
nobody respond
#90894 to #90893 - theism (07/26/2015) [-]
kill urself
User avatar #90891 - mixednuts (07/25/2015) [-]

The Sweden Democrats are organizing a gay pride rally

Through Muslim majority neighborhoods.
#90940 to #90891 - byposted (07/26/2015) [-]
"The Islamic, immigrant community is, certainly, an alien entity, in its rather repugnant regard for womyn, who are compelled, if not forced, to produce children, and dress modestly, as well as aversion to other, non-traditional, cultural displays, such as homosexual relations. Today, we march for dick, and decadence - Swedish, national staples, which shall never, I declare, be deposed by religious morality, once rid by our grandfathers, or even one of the more troublesome, secular sort, which the previous century's heroic fighters of Fascism should have postponed, for posterity! Today, we say, to the Muslims, exit your Mosques, bond with our women, or men, as we might, with yours, extramaritally disrobed, or anally probed, and blanda upp!" - t. The Swedish Nationalist
#90939 to #90891 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90938 to #90891 - byposted (07/26/2015) [-]
also: nice source
User avatar #90961 to #90938 - mixednuts (07/26/2015) [-]
I looked for others, but there weren't really many others aside from the Daily Stormer.
#90937 to #90891 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#90936 to #90891 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
#90890 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
we've got some ass wrecked anons lurking
#90898 to #90890 - klowserpok (07/26/2015) [-]
Theres always at least a dozen anons lurking here.
I wonder why...
#90882 - anon (07/25/2015) [-]
muh ess jay dubyas
User avatar #90884 to #90882 - klowserpok (07/25/2015) [-]
muh oppressors
#90881 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]

The ride never ends.

Though I think I can predict where its going.
User avatar #90877 - Tyranitar (07/25/2015) [-]
Left Wing: Poor people blaming the rich for everybody's problems.

Right Wing: Rich people blaming the poor for everybody's problems.

Neither: Actually solving the fucking problems.

And people tell me "Well, you can't hate both of them" and "You have to pick a side eventually, there is no middle ground"
#90889 to #90877 - holyfool (07/25/2015) [-]
There is a middle ground and it's called radical centrism but what you are doing is just babbling like you don't know politics at all. Just sound what you know what you're talking about instead of memeing us friend. I like to consider myself a redical centrist but this is just making you and me look bad by stating populist opinions.
#90885 to #90877 - pebar (07/25/2015) [-]
that's just factually wrong

many rich people are democrats
many poor people are republicans
User avatar #90905 to #90885 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
But neither are left wing... or even cover the vast majority of ideologies that could be considered right wing.
User avatar #90960 to #90905 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
Democrats are centre-left and Republicans are centre-right
User avatar #90966 to #90960 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
...no, they aren't. Democrats are right-leaning and Republicans are center-right. You're insane if you think the former aren't just as capitalist as the latter.

Which is perfectly fine, but American liberals have their own beliefs, they aren't pinkos.
User avatar #90969 to #90966 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
At best you have the third way people like Bill Clinton but they are centrist, not right leaning. Not everything that isn't a marxist utopia is somehow a right-wing conspiracy.
User avatar #90967 to #90966 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
So you're so far left up your ass that Democrats that rely on strong regulations, harming the free market and promoting social democracy is right leaning? Dear god that's laughable. In fact if we're talking economics wise both the Republican and Democratic party are on the left, relying on regulations, protectionism and statist policies.
User avatar #90970 to #90967 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Psst: free market capitalism isn't most of the right side of the spectrum. It's the farthest right you can possibly get. Which, again, doesn't make it wrong, but regulated welfare capitalism is still right wing, just modestly so, a few careful steps over the line.

Also, America has quite few regulations that actually protect consumers. Most of them are for maximizing profit for the current corporate entities while fucking over both consumers and potential competitors.
User avatar #90974 to #90970 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
The centre-right btw is reserved for free market true liberalism. The far-right is used to describe fascism. Which is why the spectrum is flawed in the first place.
User avatar #90980 to #90974 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
The fascists were actually moderately right, since they were state capitalists, but privatized industry useful to the state, which wasn't a rare occurrence.

Left and right is only one dimension; there is also authoritarian and libertarian. If you're a laissez-faire capitalist but "socially liberal", you're very right wing, but still very distant from conservatives, both paleo and neo. Fascists, meanwhile, are as authoritarian as it gets, being a creepy cult-level ideology that condones micromanagement of every citizen's life for the sake of some metaphysical purpose.
User avatar #90986 to #90980 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
The issue of economics is how much our property and means of production is being regulated. When the Democratic party control our property, creates laws for it, promotes Keynesian economics and supports progressive taxation, it's not what you believe is centre-right not even under your flawed view.
User avatar #90989 to #90986 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
And capitalism, which is based around ownership, accumulation and management of property by individuals instead of the state, is inherently right wing. Regulation is merely an optional framework for it to operate within. So regulated capitalism is less right wing, but still right wing.
User avatar #90984 to #90980 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
You're using a left-right spectrum that's extremely flawed and not used by any professional political scientist.
User avatar #90990 to #90984 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
If everyone is a moron than me, so be it. A one dimensional political spectrum is inherently flawed.
User avatar #90995 to #90990 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
And that spectrum is build upon the one dimensional spectrum and is in fact also very flat and one dimensional in it's thinking.
User avatar #90994 to #90990 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
Yeah everyone that has actually studies political science and are experts on the subjects no less about it than a furry on an internet website. You're not fucking revolutionary for inventing a completely flawed spectrum that arbitrarily places everyone wherever you want them, you'd actually have to understand how socio-economic societies work first.
User avatar #91001 to #90994 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
I don't have a spectrum, I have a two-dimensional plane. So do a lot of others. If I'm wrong, I'd rather be "wrong" than "right".
User avatar #90972 to #90970 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
So yeah you're the one who's batshit insane or just wilfully ignorant.
User avatar #90971 to #90970 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
"welfare capitalism is still right-wing"

I'm giving you an F on political science.

"The main ideologies of the centre-left are social democracy, social liberalism, green politics, and sometimes democratic socialism Throughout the world, centre-left groups generally support:

A mixed economy consisting of both private enterprise and publicly owned or subsidised programmes of education, universal health care, child care and related social services for all citizens.
An useful system of social security, with the stated goal of counteracting the effects of poverty and insuring the general public against loss of income following illness, unemployment or retirement (National Insurance contributions)
Government bodies that regulate private enterprise in the interests of workers and consumers by ensuring labour rights (i.e. supporting worker access to trade unions), consumer protections, and fair market competition.
A progressive taxation that includes tax breaks and subsidies for those under poverty extended from Government.
A wealth tax and/or a value-added tax to fund government expenditures.
Public investments and Keynesianism"

Every single one of these are based on programs that the Democrats and even many Republicans have created via government law.
User avatar #90975 to #90971 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
And seeing as the Democrats don't care about social democracy, the environment or even civil rights much more than most Republicans, I don't see the difference. They might've been borderline-socialist before, but they've long since become neoliberal.

User avatar #90977 to #90975 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
All of these principles that i've mentioned can be found within the bills and laws that they have pushed. They're Keynesian, they create laws promoting mixed economics, healthcare and progressive taxation. Again just because you're a far-left retard with a socialist head up your ass doesn't mean anything is right-wing.

Also neoliberalism doesn't exist, that's a pejorative used by marxist propagandists and really just shows that you're a borderline socialist lunatic.
User avatar #90981 to #90977 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
I try to remain neutral and empathic toward other viewpoints, but I'm still a smelly butthead if I don't worship Mises while words with objective definitions don't real because narratives. I guess Lenin had a point after all, sad as that is.

User avatar #90983 to #90981 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
Also you've never been neutral, you've always been that mentally unstable left-winger that thinks anything else is too right-wing.
User avatar #90985 to #90983 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Uh, no, I just don't think extreme leftism is very common anymore. When was the last time Castro made headlines for a civil rights violation?

My point was that I was trying to emphasize that I don't look down on other viewpoints and you bitched about someone who thinks differently from you existing anyway.
User avatar #90992 to #90985 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
The extreme left is far more common than extreme right in our modern day. Venezuela, North Korea, Puerto Rico, Vietnam, Laos all suffer from poor human rights violations and a terrible economic landscape thanks to radical left socialism. And the reason is because while it is possible to have an authoritarian country with a free market, the economics of it are separate from the authority, while a socialist economy relies on authoritarianism, it reduces people to a collective and makes them incapable of voluntary cooperation.
User avatar #90982 to #90981 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
It doesn't take a proponent of liberalism to recognize how utterly fucked up your views on the political spectrum are. It's laughable, it's insisting that anyone that isn't a socialist nutcase is a "neoliberal" a pathetic black white way to see it.
User avatar #90987 to #90982 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
There is a wide plethora of different political views...objectively. In America, they're all very similar with petty issues to distract people from real problems.

User avatar #90993 to #90987 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
Likely calling everything right-wing is useful.
User avatar #90996 to #90993 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Oh, get fucked. You're spewing logical fallacies, i.e. soshulism is the cause of all problems, and accusing me of doing the same to poison the well. In this case, the old' straw man, because capitalism is not "everything".
User avatar #90997 to #90996 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
Well if you don't like me saying that socialism causes problem then socialist countries need to stop sucking for once.
User avatar #90998 to #90997 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
Socialist country sucks -> socialism is the problem
Capitalist country sucks -> socialism is the problem
User avatar #90999 to #90998 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
When did i ever say this? I'll be waiting. Otherwise yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman
User avatar #91000 to #90999 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
You're claiming socialism fails in socialist countries, which is fair, I have no reason to defend incompetence. But how is an American unincorporated territory or a neo-fascist dictatorship socialist?
User avatar #91002 to #91000 - kanadetenshi (07/26/2015) [-]
You were talking about there being no extreme leftism, i stated that there are more extreme leftists than there are extreme right-wing countries and gave you a list of said countries. If you know of any right-wing free market capitalist countries who's human rights records are as bad as theirs i'd be interested in seeing them.
User avatar #90873 to #90870 - newbtwo (07/25/2015) [-]
you kinda proved their point tho, you brought muh SJW hate into it when it was mostly about negativity and lack of humor, which is true

User avatar #90874 to #90873 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
>progressive circlejerk bitching about non existent /pol/ circlejerk
>i proved their point by posting one dissenting comment

nah, but thanks for proving my point tho
User avatar #90875 to #90874 - newbtwo (07/25/2015) [-]
but the OP isnt bitching primarily about the pol circlejerk

its about negativity and lack of humor
User avatar #90876 to #90875 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
actually his paragraph on his content was addressing political aspects of funnyjunk and how we're turning into /pol/ and some such bullshit

the comments were also whining about how we're all racist and blah blah blah

this is obvious, go read them again

if you still cant see it i cant help you
User avatar #90879 to #90876 - lulzforeverreborn (07/25/2015) [-]
Literally this, it has never been about humor. Its politically motivated because they dont like our type of humor.
User avatar #90880 to #90879 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
the reality is the comment and the content making it to front page in the first place completely destroys any notion of this place being a /pol/ circlejerk

this tactic for sjws has been used constantly, make unpopular opinions seem radical and unwelcome, then slowly start introducing more and more progressive content

it has happened to every single image sharing site that has gotten popular and it will happen to us

i even expect politics to get taken over sometime in the future when its discovered
#91081 to #90880 - anon (18 hours ago) [-]
except it's the other way around. there's been less and less 'progessive' opinions and more and more opinions that we are more likely to associate with.
User avatar #91082 to #91081 - youregaylol (18 hours ago) [-]
but thats wrong

also "we" implies you're not a progressive anon
User avatar #90872 to #90870 - lulzforeverreborn (07/25/2015) [-]
Shit they are starting to fight back, that post has a lot of thumbs. We need to push it to the ground.
User avatar #90878 to #90872 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
you cant fight the hoard that way im afraid
#90862 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
Why I Support Donald Trump
User avatar #90864 to #90862 - kanadetenshi (07/25/2015) [-]
Lol it's the "autism is a hoax" kid.
User avatar #90863 to #90862 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Donald Trump got kicked out of his house, what a cuck.
#90850 - kanadetenshi (07/24/2015) [-]
Republicans presidential candidate Bobby Jindal is suspending his race after the shooting in Lafayette, Louisiana which he is the governor of. Stating that "We are going to do whatever we can to support our community"

#90849 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
We don't post these things in months.
#90888 to #90849 - holyfool (07/25/2015) [-]
Accurate for the most part, used to be more center.
I am a radical centrist but the red pill is too stronk.
#90871 to #90849 - theultimateuser has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90866 to #90861 - lulzforeverreborn (07/25/2015) [-]
Did I do good yourgaylol pebar ?
User avatar #90867 to #90866 - youregaylol (07/25/2015) [-]
you spelled my name wrong so no

#90868 to #90867 - lulzforeverreborn (07/25/2015) [-]
The transformation continues I see.
#90886 to #90868 - holyfool (07/25/2015) [-]
You have become enlightened to the truth!
You have become enlightened to the truth!
#90857 to #90849 - mixednuts (07/24/2015) [-]
I think it puts me more left than I actually am.
User avatar #90858 to #90857 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Socially liberal stances place you more to the left.
User avatar #90859 to #90858 - pebar (07/24/2015) [-]
there are certain questions that have economic repercussions that do not sound economic
for example
"The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders."

Glorious Milton Friedman wrote a famous article about this and he said that if companies have a responsibility to society, then society has a moral claim on the property which is the type of reasoning that could easily lead to socialism and the destruction of society.
It's a bit of a slippery slope but it's a good read.
User avatar #90860 to #90859 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Only 6 pages, good. I'll give it a try then.
#90852 to #90849 - pebar (07/24/2015) [-]
about the same as last time

as I recall, the last time we tried this, it was all glitched
User avatar #90854 to #90852 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
I remember now. I tried the other one with about 6 bars that would go either left or right before this, but it still wasn't working.
#90853 to #90852 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
#90851 to #90849 - klowserpok (07/24/2015) [-]
Weird, I've actually become less authoritarian since visiting here and /pol/
User avatar #90855 to #90851 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
This test is really flawed in determining how libertarian or authoritarian someone is. Maybe because certain stances weigh too much.
User avatar #90839 to #90837 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
all youre going to do is empower jamal to pimp out your homeless sister legally
User avatar #90841 to #90839 - pebar (07/24/2015) [-]
if my sister were homeless, then she would need every option she could get
User avatar #90844 to #90843 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
Would you be okay with your mother selling her body to support you as a kid, and since its legal everyone knows about it and you're known as the whores child.
User avatar #90845 to #90844 - pebar (07/24/2015) [-]
how is it different than flipping burgers for minimum wage?
User avatar #90846 to #90845 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
because flipping burgers in honest work, sucking dick makes you a whore

so you'd be okay with it?
User avatar #90847 to #90846 - pebar (07/24/2015) [-]
you can flip burgers; you can be a whore
I think people should be allowed to choose without getting arrested

I would imagine being the son of a criminal would be more embarrassing
User avatar #90869 to #90847 - lulzforeverreborn (07/25/2015) [-]
Nah I rather have my Mom be a convicted murder then a whore. Nothing beats the second one...nothing
User avatar #90848 to #90847 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
depends on the crime

and thats all well and good until you come home one day and see your mom getting porked by your coworkers or something
User avatar #90827 - feelythefeel (07/24/2015) [-]
How can I reach people about what I have to say, politically speaking? Haven't used Facebook in years, and I'm not even sure how Tumblr works, nevermind if it'll do anything.
User avatar #90908 to #90827 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
You don't, online. That only leads to jerks of the circular variety.
User avatar #90856 to #90827 - klowserpok (07/24/2015) [-]
What lulz said, start with your family/friends
But don't go full in their face "hitler did nothing wrong"/"holocaust never happened".
Its bound to just alienate people who are not prepared to accept things counter to their beliefs, yet..
Rather, start with modern things, like TPP, what gun control really means, and how democracy is flawed when the voice of ZOGs corporations matters more than that of the actual people.
And if you want to argue against immigration, good fucking luck you racist goy.
Aren't you from Hongcouver anyway?
User avatar #90840 to #90827 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
You mean any kind of people or people you personally know? If it's the first, Facebook may have groups that might interest you.
#90838 to #90827 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #90832 to #90827 - drastronomy ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Start with friends and family
Then opinion pieces in newspapers
User avatar #90830 to #90827 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Start with your family. Redpill them for real, not pussy footing around.

Then just circlejerk here.
User avatar #90821 - feelythefeel (07/24/2015) [-]
If immigrants hate America so much, why don't they just leave? What's that? It's not so bad?

Then why the fuck are they complaining so much?
User avatar #90822 to #90821 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Well to be fair, an immigrant who is a citizen should act like one. That means critiquing the country for its betterment.

For example I am an immigrant but I am doing the right thing by scrutinizing the Canadian immigration system because that is what a true citizen should do.
User avatar #90823 to #90822 - feelythefeel (07/24/2015) [-]
I'm talking mostly about illegals, but immigrants who want their host country to be more like the country they just ran from are stupid in general.
User avatar #90824 to #90823 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Yeah well that makes sense. Illegals in general should be kicked out or executed. I prefer number two, it will scare those spics away from illegally invading a sovereign state.

User avatar #90825 to #90824 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Same with North Africa and Europe, shoot torpedoes on their boats.
#90826 to #90825 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
im glad to see you boys getting along again
User avatar #90828 to #90826 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
A backstabber is always a backstabber, I'm just talking about the topic at hand.
#90819 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Also what are your opinions on Augusto Pinochet and the Miracle of Chile (for which he is responsible partially for whether you hated him or not) ?
User avatar #90911 to #90819 - Shiny (07/26/2015) [-]
The Chicago school turnaround was great at banking on big promises of opportunity, but didn't take long to implode upon itself and require some baseline of regulation.

It's a prosperous country now, after being run by socialists for years, which I'm sure is just pure luck that the pinkos haven't disrupted Pinochet's perfect system.
#91052 to #90911 - lulzforeverreborn (07/27/2015) [-]
pebar kanadetenshi

Lets see this shit go down.
User avatar #90834 to #90819 - kanadetenshi (07/24/2015) [-]
The miracle of Chile is one of the greatest economic turn overs i've seen. Chile used to be a socialist country with massive chronic inflation and now it is the most thriving democratic society in Latin America period. Pretty much everyone in poor latin american countries always think of going to Chile because of how prosperous it is.

I have no love for Pinochet, sure he made the decision to implement these economic programs after the Chicago Boys recommended him but he was a fascist that controlled people and stifled freedom, ironically it was the economic policies he placed that eventually led to him stepping down.

So the miracle of chile? Great! Pinochet? Not so great.
#90820 to #90819 - holyfool (07/24/2015) [-]
A glorious leader and a pure example of the glory of fascism. He was a God amongst men who saved the economy from the collapse caused by wicked communists. He does not get enough recognition when referring to the fascist ideology and he should be more well known for his acts that saved his nation. He is crucified by the media as they over exaggerate his actions because of the socialists that still linger along with the few communists.
#90818 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
What is true freedom? Does absolute freedom corrupt absolutely?

Are we born to love freedom this much, can the sacrifice of some freedom for the betterment of humanity be a good thing?
User avatar #90833 to #90818 - drastronomy ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Depends on the state of the nation
In a rich nation, freedom allows degeneracy to fester
In a poor nation, freedom allows progress
#90815 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Will I get blocked if I say I sympathize greatly with fascism? Not the Hitler kind, the Augusto Pinochet/Mussolini kind.
User avatar #90816 to #90815 - youregaylol (07/24/2015) [-]
User avatar #90794 - AreyouSerious ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
Why do conservatives want to get rid of abortion clinic and planned parenthood? How does the right benefit form this?

I mean prior to the whole video scandal Planned Parenthood is having right now
User avatar #90810 to #90794 - lulzforeverreborn (07/24/2015) [-]
Not all conservatives, usually the religious ones. Not all right-winger care about abortion, if anything I think we need far more of it.
#90887 to #90810 - anon (07/25/2015) [-]
Right-winger = hypocrisy
User avatar #90797 to #90794 - pebar (07/23/2015) [-]
because moral reasons
User avatar #90800 to #90797 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
It would reduce the number of poor and minority voters politically benefiting them.
#90801 to #90800 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
So, conservatives benefit from there being more poor and minority babies?

Wouldn't they actually benefit more by supporting abortion, considering thats going to reduce the amount of poor and minority voters who you believe dont vote for them?
User avatar #90802 to #90801 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
That's exactly what I'm saying.
#90803 to #90802 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
"conservatives benefit from there being more poor and minority babies"

you agree with this part?
User avatar #90804 to #90803 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
No, literally the exact opposite.

Did you read my first comment?
#90805 to #90804 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
>"Why do conservatives oppose abortion and why do they beenfit from opposing abortion?"-Q
>"Because of morals"-A
>"Because it would reduce the number of poor and minority voters"-You

Do you see the problem here?
User avatar #90806 to #90805 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
I didn't say because. I was offering a counterpoint. Are you retarded or just shitposting?
#90807 to #90806 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
Counterpoint to what? You said something that didn't make sense, shut the fuck up.
User avatar #90808 to #90807 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
You're putting actual effort into misinterpreting what I'm saying. That or you never finished third grade. You shut the fuck up.
#90809 to #90808 - anon (07/24/2015) [-]
Let me try to explain your stupidity again since you didn't understand it the first time.

He asked why conservatives OPPOSE abortion, and what they BENEFIT from OPPOSING abortion.

You said it would reduce the number of poor and minority voters.

Thats DOES NOT benefit conservatives. You said something that didn't make sense, and instead of admitting it you're acting like a cunt, so shut the fuck up, you fucking retard.
User avatar #90814 to #90809 - theism (07/24/2015) [-]
I didn't reply to him you fucking retard I replied to pebar.
User avatar #90795 to #90794 - kanadetenshi (07/23/2015) [-]
They don't want to get rid of them, they want them to be investigated and defunded if the stories are accurate.
User avatar #90786 - youregaylol (07/23/2015) [-]

watch this documentary by nat geo if you want a look at what north korea is really like
User avatar #90791 to #90786 - kanadetenshi (07/23/2015) [-]
Can't seem to watch this but i did see a difference one with a guy who went undercover. I could remember there being a restaurant that was completely empty, no customers at all. But the waitresses still put food on every table (or what you could describe as food) and eventually took the food. It was really weird.

Also the guy entered a souvenir shop with only one girl controlling it and she hadn't seen customers in moth. He stayed and played some ping pong with her. It was cute.
User avatar #90793 to #90791 - kanadetenshi (07/23/2015) [-]

Really brain?
#90789 to #90786 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
"There's no internet and cell phones have been banned"
There is internet but it's so limited it's almost as if there wasn't. The part about cell phones is a lie. Most have cell phones. They even have cell phone factories.
User avatar #90790 to #90789 - youregaylol (07/23/2015) [-]
take in the whole documentary first, it's pretty eye opening

they talk to real north korean citizens there
User avatar #90835 to #90790 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
>Eye opening
Took a long time before figuring this out.
User avatar #90836 to #90835 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/24/2015) [-]
Well memed.
User avatar #90792 to #90790 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
Fucking Nat Geo doesn't show it in my country and the same video posted by someone else in parts is blocked except for the first part out of five. I'll try to find a way.
User avatar #90796 to #90792 - byposted (07/23/2015) [-]
I'll help you...hold on.
User avatar #90798 to #90796 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
It's alright, I'm seeing it on Daily Motion.
User avatar #90787 to #90786 - youregaylol (07/23/2015) [-]
User avatar #90799 to #90787 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
The "propaganda village" was meant for intimidating american and south korean troops, not to attract defectors. They put loudspeakers in it and it was occupied by the KPA as far as I know.
User avatar #90788 to #90787 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (07/23/2015) [-]
Blocked in my country. Someone else posted though, so I'll take a look.
#90783 - pebar (07/23/2015) [-]
#90781 - kanadetenshi (07/23/2015) [-]
England, where even the politicians have banter.
 Friends (0)