Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
Latest users (5): dehumanizer, jewishcommunazi, klowserpok, levvy, schnizel, anonymous(18).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#47111 to #47110 - valeriya (09/07/2013) [-]
Hmm, good luck with that.
User avatar #47106 - nigalthornberry (09/07/2013) [-]
Shouldn't Gay marriage be left up to the churches for decision because its as much of a religious ceremony as a legal one
User avatar #47116 to #47106 - kyuubey (09/07/2013) [-]
The definition of marriage has been changed long ago and is no longer purely religious.

I think that homosexuals should be able to marry but churches may deny gay couple a church wedding ceremony if they choose so.
User avatar #47117 to #47116 - nigalthornberry (09/07/2013) [-]
Thats basically what i think
User avatar #47108 to #47106 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
There are a lot of legal benefits that go along with getting married; it's not just a religious thing.
If you want to demote marriage as a legal term to just civil union and leave "marriage" to the churches, that'd probably be a nice compromise.
#47113 to #47108 - cabbagemayhem (09/07/2013) [-]
My concern, that has gone largely unaddressed, is how legal gay marriage might allow them to adopt children.
User avatar #47114 to #47113 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
Is that a problem? Even though same sex couples may not be as good as heterosexual ones, it's probably still better than foster care.
User avatar #47118 to #47114 - nigalthornberry (09/07/2013) [-]
Just as long as the parents care about the kid should we really care
User avatar #47121 to #47118 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
Well in my view, marriage is a government subsidy that's used to help families and to encourage growth in the population. If hypothetically gay couples turn out to be horrible at raising children (which the evidence shows they do fine), then we should care and the government should not subsidize it.

But as far as two consenting adult men like to fuck each other in the ass, then no we shouldn't care.
#47084 - cabbagemayhem (09/07/2013) [-]
"If you are not a liberal at twenty, you have no heart and if you are not conservative at thirty, you have no brain."

- Wendell Willkie (adapted from Francois Guisot in the 1940 election according to a historical biography of FDR)
User avatar #47053 - djequalizee (09/07/2013) [-]
What is a politic
User avatar #47150 to #47053 - mykoira (09/08/2013) [-]
a politic is a small group of blood-sucking creatures called ticks. the name comes from greece word pollá (many) and tic (short for ticks)
#47058 to #47053 - cabbagemayhem (09/07/2013) [-]
It's the unit quantity of tears cried by those who disagree with you.
#47052 - djequalizee has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #47048 - chrisfloyd (09/06/2013) [-]
If you could change one thing about society what would it be and why?
User avatar #47071 to #47048 - akkere ONLINE (09/07/2013) [-]
Kill the cancer that is news sensationalism that is otherwise reducing moderate-minded political thought processes and promoting "sport" and inflammatory ones in place.
At the very center of all bias in the news and misinformation is this, and even though it serves its purpose in motivating people to approaching the issue, often times that motivation bears little actual fruit and is mostly a tool of manipulation for political parties.
Destroy it, and all you'd have left is more central news that's pure facts and information.
User avatar #47059 to #47048 - feelythefeel (09/07/2013) [-]
Human nature. Everything else comes after that as a matter of course.
#47055 to #47048 - cabbagemayhem (09/07/2013) [-]
Everyone accepts Jesus into their hearts. Then there will be no religious wars, everyone will be happy and nice to each other, and we can all move forward together at a rate never previously realized.
#47054 to #47048 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
That the government would respect the constitution.   
because our freedom has been slowly eroding away for a few decades now
That the government would respect the constitution.

because our freedom has been slowly eroding away for a few decades now
#47043 - valeriya (09/06/2013) [-]
You know, there's not much of a difference between modern day zionism and fascism, why aren't you fascists supporting Israel in their national struggle?
User avatar #47050 to #47043 - achimp (09/07/2013) [-]
Go back to /pol/
#47037 - EdwardNigma (09/06/2013) [-]
Election Day in Australia, where Tony Abbot will probably win!   
Election Day in Australia, where Tony Abbot will probably win!
User avatar #47045 to #47037 - jadewest (09/06/2013) [-]
#47046 to #47045 - EdwardNigma (09/06/2013) [-]
My sister and her boyfriend legit started playing this before they left to vote.   
It's accurate to say the least.
Douch and Turd 2012 Election song My sister and her boyfriend legit started playing this before they left to vote.

It's accurate to say the least.
User avatar #47027 - danke (09/06/2013) [-]
East Germany is best Germany
User avatar #47033 to #47027 - feelythefeel (09/06/2013) [-]
And here I was thinking that modern Germany is the best it's ever been. Huh.
#47031 to #47027 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
Population doesn't like you? Bring in the tanks. - Stalin
#47032 to #47031 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
Although they did keep the traditional German military culture. West Germany just became a satellite of America.

German Military Parade - NVA guards Berlin ´87.
#47029 to #47027 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
East Germany was the most productive country under Moscow's rule but that was all and it had everything to do with the already productive Germany society that they took over. The Second Reich was the best Germany.
User avatar #47030 to #47029 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
And I meant the Third Reich, although Bismark was quite the character.
#47034 to #47030 - valeriya (09/06/2013) [-]
"Hit the Poles so hard that they despair of their life; I have full sympathy with their condition, but if we want to survive, we can only exterminate them."

No one likes poles.
#47038 to #47034 - ubermench has deleted their comment [-]
#47025 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
All evidence is pointing to my prediction becoming true. The House will vote Nay but this will not sway Obongo.

#47028 to #47025 - byposted (09/06/2013) [-]
Russia warns over Syria atomic risk
Who wants to bet on Russia bombing one of these facilities when Obongo starts bombing Syria so as to make it seem like it was American bombs that did so?

Putin is WWIII casus belli pro.
#47021 - CapnInterwebz (09/06/2013) [-]
Maybe we should turn our attention from Syria to our own government when the men who should be debating the destiny of a large chunk of the world are actually playing online poker.
User avatar #47026 to #47021 - akkere ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
You've never lived life until you're up to debate a wartime decision and you've got double aces and kings.
User avatar #47020 - pebar (09/06/2013) [-]
In college, I learned that counter-culture liberals are uncivilized.
I love North Dakota.
User avatar #47049 to #47020 - undeadwill (09/07/2013) [-]
Counter culture liberals?
User avatar #47051 to #47049 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
"muh white privilege"
User avatar #47062 to #47051 - undeadwill (09/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #47064 to #47062 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
Civilization is built on people working together to survive in a sort of harmony that keeps everything together. While different cultures have different customs, as long as it works for them, they're fine. But if you go along with that definition, people who try to upset that balance of culture go against the harmony that keeps society together, and thus are uncivilized.
User avatar #47065 to #47064 - undeadwill (09/07/2013) [-]
White people are uncivil?
User avatar #47066 to #47065 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
no, the type of people who are upset with the customs of a specific culture and actively go against them are uncivil.
User avatar #47067 to #47066 - undeadwill (09/07/2013) [-]
sooo liberals?
User avatar #47068 to #47067 - pebar (09/07/2013) [-]
the ones that get in your face about it, yeah
User avatar #47069 to #47068 - undeadwill (09/07/2013) [-]
Murder them.
#47016 - maddboiy (09/05/2013) [-]
Um, what?
User avatar #47036 to #47016 - undeadwill (09/06/2013) [-]
1% capitalism.
User avatar #47035 to #47016 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (09/06/2013) [-]
"You are a Social Democrat totally not a social democrat. 10 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 6 percent are more extremist than you."

41% cosmopolitan;
90% secular;
64% visionary;
57% anarchistic;
60% communistic;
5% pacifist;
12% anthropocentric.
User avatar #47010 - roliga (09/05/2013) [-]
>live in Tolerance Zone #65
>be nu-trans fourth trimester transsensual Angst Profile ZETA-8 genderqueer pseudo-dyke reformed lesbiophilic heteromollusc
>see cis white male at the zoo
>ask "mommies, what's that?"
>they don't know
>Genderless Polyamorous Parental Unit #2 takes me into a Safe Zone and engages the Feelings Shield
>tells me that it is a monster from the beforetime
>tells me not to be scared, because the monsters' penisocracy was smashed by the forces of the LBJQGTA5 Coalition in the Patriarchy Wars
>start to cry
>s/he opens his and/or her rainbow mesh vest and retrieves an estrogen pill to cheer me up
>feel the calming femininity wash over me
>s/he tells me that the monsters aren't allowed to hurt anyone anymore, only to work, to support our glorious society
>go back out to gaze once more at the cis-gendered abomination
>throw Privilege Peanuts at him
>everyone laughs
>take some soma
>go home and read some consensus-approved feelings-safe literature
User avatar #47018 to #47010 - undeadwill (09/05/2013) [-]
Consensus approved.

Feeling safe.

I would lose my fucking mind and start burning shit.
#47006 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
AIPAC Activism On Syria Disappears From New York Times

User avatar #47007 to #47006 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
This is the totality of the removed text:

"Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group Aipac was already at work pressing for military action against the government of Mr. Assad, fearing that if Syria escapes American retribution for its use of chemical weapons, Iran might be emboldened in the future to attack Israel. In the House, the majority leader, Eric Cantor of Virginia, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, has long worked to challenge Democrats’ traditional base among Jews.

One administration official, who, like others, declined to be identified discussing White House strategy, called Aipac “the 800-pound gorilla in the room,” and said its allies in Congress had to be saying, “If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line” against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, “we’re in trouble.”
User avatar #46986 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
princessren and damayo I have to ask why is Obama a good president?
User avatar #46992 to #46986 - damayo (09/04/2013) [-]
I agree with princessren. He's a meh president. He's done good things such as repealing DOMA, Passing The Dream Act., and Passing Universal Health Care. But there is more I believe he could do. However you have to take the Republicans trying their best make sure nothing gets done into account.
User avatar #46994 to #46992 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
"Universal heath care"
Top Hurr durr.
Didn't pass, isn't universal and only drives costs up.

And the generals wanted DOMA removed it nothing to do with Obama he was just the guy responding to the voting public.

And tell me what is "The Dream Act."
User avatar #47008 to #46997 - undeadwill (09/05/2013) [-]
Why is it when I make a good point you stop replying?
User avatar #47009 to #47008 - damayo (09/05/2013) [-]
Because I only pop in to visit FJ when other sites I browse are getting dull
User avatar #47004 to #46997 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
It drives up costs because it doesn't provide jack shit all it really does is force you to buy healthcare from a private business.

Obama-care also forces small business to add part time employees to the healthcare plan thus causing them to close shop.

Seems to be anything "Good" he really did is subjective to what side you are one or demographic you belong to while everything else he never did.

And in no way does the "good" outweigh the bad.

Fast and Furious, IRS, Liberia, trying to get North Korea to attack, NSA, Patriot act, and etc.

"Ended the war in Iraq" And started how many more wars in the process?
User avatar #47003 to #46997 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
Seems to me all of his economic programs lack bite or redistributing money to welfare.
User avatar #47002 to #46997 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
So wait.

The dream program doesn't seem to make sense. People who aren't paying into the system get to benefit from it. That doesn't seem like a good program.
User avatar #46998 to #46997 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
Addicting info.
You know that site thinks that the onion is actually factual?

First one: Nothing to do with him, democrats control the senate.

Second one: He basically just wrote: "All those workers we contracted out? Yeah We aren't paying you sucker." With the first sorce then wrote:
This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Meaning "YEAH I WROTE THIS. but it does nothing. "
User avatar #46999 to #46998 - damayo (09/04/2013) [-]
Have you considered actually googling these questions and reading up on him from non critical sources?
User avatar #47001 to #46999 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
Allot of the links in the links you gave me don't fucking work.
User avatar #47000 to #46999 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
No. I actually wrote all of this. I use to be a fan of addicting info like I was in a cult. Then I grew up and realized they were wrong and bullshit.
#46993 to #46992 - princessren has deleted their comment [-]
#46996 to #46993 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
Because you left the board. No one leave the political board
User avatar #46995 to #46993 - damayo (09/04/2013) [-]
yeah he went through my and replied to all the thread I replied to earlier.
User avatar #47005 to #46995 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
"My and" My what?
#46987 to #46986 - princessren has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #46991 to #46987 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
Could you name a policy of his you support or like that makes him "neutral?"
User avatar #46984 - pebar (09/04/2013) [-]
Contemporary moral issues went well again today. According to my teacher, if everyone were able to simply choose their own morality and society should just tolerate it, it wouldn't work. You would have to be able to call your mother and tell her that if she were raped, it would be ok as long as the rapist chose that it was morally right.
haha, liberals

on an unrelated topic
User avatar #46989 to #46984 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
McCoon is still stuck in Vietnam, I tell you. I hope he dies soon.
User avatar #46945 - thesoulless ONLINE (09/04/2013) [-]
How was anyone shocked/surprised about the whole anti-gay thing in Russia. I mean, seriously, we're talking about a country who's history, in a sentence, is being a hostile environment to anyone and everyone. Was it unexpected? Well, yeah, but it's certainly not something that's bizarre, especially with a guy like Putin at the reins
#46969 to #46945 - pebar (09/04/2013) [-]
I'm confused about why FJ seems to have a high view of Putin.
I'm confused about why FJ seems to have a high view of Putin.
User avatar #46968 to #46945 - aoeui (09/04/2013) [-]
Russia has an opinion? Fuck them, right? They're just bigoted homophobes.
User avatar #46983 to #46968 - CapnInterwebz (09/04/2013) [-]
Russia is not a single person with one set of opinions, it is a large group of people. Although many people might have zero tolerance for homosexuals (the vote to enact that law was unanimous, wasn't it?), they do not refelct the ideals of all Russians. Hence why there are gay Russians and other people that are not excited about watchinging others being beat down in the streets for the sake of "child safety".
User avatar #46988 to #46983 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
Nobody cares about fags in Russia except Westerners, funny that. They're kept in their place and a majority of Russians see it that way. The Communist Party even supports the law. It doesn't matter if there is a group of liberal dissenters; they can move to Sweden.

There's a huge cultural difference between America, Sweden and the rest of the world. Fags are still seen as deviant in areas where MTV doesn't shape values from childhood.
User avatar #46948 to #46945 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
The law reflects what Russians believe. I know its hard to accept this fact but fag-acceptance is really only seen here and in Northern Europe.
#46936 - pebar (09/04/2013) [-]
I hate it when political policies are made based on emotions when children are involved... Just like sandy hook, people are saying "oh what about the children in Syria, I would hate for that to happen to my children." It completely blinds clouds people's judgement when making a responsible decision.
I hate it when political policies are made based on emotions when children are involved... Just like sandy hook, people are saying "oh what about the children in Syria, I would hate for that to happen to my children." It completely blinds clouds people's judgement when making a responsible decision.
User avatar #46981 to #46936 - undeadwill (09/04/2013) [-]
No matter what we do or how hard we try and can not pick the peaceful winner its like storm cloak vs imperials in Skyrim.
Bad independence or good imperialism.
User avatar #46958 to #46936 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
Do you think the American public would be more eager to bomb Syria if John Kerry explained in detail his theory on Mid-East geopolitics and how Syria's destruction plays to its benefit?

Most people in the world use their emotions to conduct thinking. It's natural and politicians play on it as such. I find it interesting how libertarians come to view this as bad or unnatural in some way. Perhaps there is some truth to libertarianism being a codeword for autism. If it is the goal for a politician to gain the support of the commoner, reaching out via abstractions will do nothing.
User avatar #46959 to #46958 - pebar (09/04/2013) [-]
If the action really is to save children, then sure, and there's nothing wrong with acting based on emotion with that goal in mind. But children are more often used as mere propaganda tools to manipulate the population to support a decision, regardless of whether that decision would actually save children or not.
User avatar #46960 to #46959 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
I'm not disagreeing with you but am saying that human emotion is linked with decision making. Children are rightfully seen in such a protective way for the human mind has a natural tendency to safeguard children.

Is it so hard to understand why a large chunk of gun-control activists are soccer-mom types? A majority of the population has no objective interest in politics. Most have subjective interests such as the soccer-moms or hideous feminists.

The question is not trying to manipulate the human mind into thinking rationally but to play on its emotions. Most Americans don't even know where Syria is but they can be tricked into supporting a war with the right delivery.

Libertarians need to stop thinking about the individual when they're staring at a flock of sheep.
User avatar #46961 to #46960 - pebar (09/04/2013) [-]
>not trying to manipulate the human mind into thinking rationally but to play on its emotions

that's why I hate it
#46928 - byposted (09/04/2013) [-]
Did anybody watch the Senate discussion on Syria today? Rand Paul asked a simple question: Why should we intervene if it will make the Middle East less stable? Kerryberg responded by talking about Israel's security and began to project illogically. Kerry and a Democrat Senator entertained the thought of authorizing rebels to take control of chemical weapons! On CNN there was some Jewish dyke using the holocaust as casus belli.

The good news is that Rand Paul may filibuster the vote:

les liberators:
 Friends (0)