Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (2): marinepenguin, youregaylol, anonymous(35).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#98552 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Byposted
#98548 - anon
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Tim Buckley earned enough money from ctrl+alt+del to quit his job

Why are you still a Capitalist?
#98546 - anon
Reply -1
(11/13/2015) [-]
lol Rand Paul is a manlet.
#98551 to #98546 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Pataki
#98545 - theism
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
There's no human right to be agreed with. On the flip side just being contrarian doesn't make your perspective valuable.
#98541 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
There certainly seems to be a weird fetich with the word "cuck" on this board, for some reason often aimed at those who believe in liberty.
But aren't the "cucked" in fact really those, who do not wish to take independent choices for themselves, but would rather have someone else control and tell them what to do with their lives?
I mean, if the word means to be sexually submissive, wouldn't it, used in a political context, in fact be authoritarians who are cucked, as they are submissive to their government?
#98564 to #98541 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/13/2015) [-]
No. A cuck is someone who yields something of extreme value (eg, your wife) to an opposing party (a bull) due to their own weakness, often by their own will as well.

The same applies to race and racemixing. You are handing your culture, your heritage, your race, and your history to the will of something as petty as love. Some things are worth more than relationships.
#98581 to #98564 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
something of extreme value..... like liberty
to an opposing party..... the government
by their own weakness..... they willfully surrendered
#98585 to #98581 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
If freedom entails the sacrifice of something valuable, as in this case, this freedom is by extention something negative.
#98616 to #98585 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
#98646 to #98616 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Regardless of the value of freedom as a concept, it still has a lower value when in practice. If limiting an individuals freedom increases their potential to do objectively good deeds, then limit their freedom.

And using your prison metaphor, taking away the freedom of prisoners yields good results. Thus, in some cases freedom is negative for society as a whole, underlinging my point. Killing ones genepool is inherently negative for our species as a whole, and thus freedom of racemixing is as silly of a freedom as the freedom to be an alcoholic, except being an alcoholic does not have long-term effects on a civilization as a whole.
#98617 to #98616 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
#98516 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
#98536 to #98516 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
>>#98522, a 10 foot wall requires an 11 foot ladder
#98538 to #98536 - anon
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Or better, take a boat.
#98537 to #98536 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/29/hold-hungarian-border-fence-so-effective-illegal-immigrants-are-now-at-pre-migrant-crisis-levels/
If Hungary can do it, we can do it.
Unless you of course think the reason for its effectiveness is the refugees' incapability to build ladders.
#98539 to #98537 - akkere ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1895418_1877436,00.html
In all seriousness, this would be the real problem with simply hinging everything on "build a wall". Tunnels, the one thing refugees alone can't build, but organized crime syndicates (i.e. the Mexican/Colombian Drug Cartels) can and have. I wouldn't be surprised if there were Eastern European crime syndicates (or even straight-up ISIS) looking to simply coax the refugees into something like this (though it's probably unnecessary for the former).
#98540 to #98539 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
I am not saying simply building a wall would be sufficient, but it would help a great deal. Also, you would need bigger tunnels to effectively smuggle immigrants, which would be more difficult to hide.
It is given that the construction of an American fence would be much, much more extensive than the Hungarian, but I believe that it nonetheless holds promise. Several measures has to be taken to stop illegal immigration, but an effective border fence is certainly one the key components.
#98542 to #98540 - akkere ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
The thing is, by simply chanting "build a wall", it doesn't give the fundamental idea of strengthening the infrastructure of the border as much credit as it desperately needs, for we'd also need to determine the necessity of setting technologies needed to detect and project the cavities these tunnels form, as well as figure out whether or not the Cartel will develop tunnels large enough to smuggle entire people. This also goes especially for Trump's "proposal", which is pivoted completely on having the Mexican government fund the construction objective, which there's no guarantee will occur without time-consuming escalation. There needs to be a secondary plan of funding to cover that time.
I agree we should defend against illegal immigration, but there needs to be a better form of both organization of construct and communication of the key fundamentals.
#98522 to #98516 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Spread the word, dear voter.
#98533 to #98522 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I imagine it'd be pretty disappointing if they actually built it but in my mind it could be good.
#98523 to #98522 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
okelidokeli
#98531 to #98523 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
That's disgusting and he looks like he has gum disease.
#98532 to #98531 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
If you want to see something disgusting you should take a deep look at this.

Thats right, those are my toes. I bet you can feel the smell over there.
#98534 to #98532 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
You're disgusting.
#98535 to #98534 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Oh, thanks! *blushes like an anime girl*
#98497 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
I like Americans. I don't agree with everything you do but damn I have to love you sometimes.
#98509 to #98497 - schnizel
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
>cuck.jpg
#98529 to #98509 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
No, I just like that they stand up against authoritarianism.
#98568 to #98529 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Wow, you are cuck 2.0
#98506 to #98497 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Thanks.
#98480 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
This goes against my better judgement, but I may actually end up supporting donald trump in the coming weeks.

Even though I doubt his plans are workable, theres a part of me that wants him in office just on the off chance it does work, that he does somehow start deporting the juans and their chitlens and start purging the liberal/rino guard.

None of the other candidates have given me any hope, with him there is.

However, theres an 80% chance I'm being fooled and hes just handing the election to the dems, idk.

schnizel, whats your take.
#98547 to #98480 - anon
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
>RINO guard

I think you're mistaken, the Teatards and Crypto-Facists are the insurgents.
#98525 to #98480 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
#98507 to #98480 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Muh libruls and wetbacks are both important issues, but it is our foreign policies that are the greatest risk to the future of the American people. We cannot allow nations like China and Russia to pursue superpower status.
#98508 to #98507 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Nice theme account kevin.
#98519 to #98508 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Kevin who?
#98483 to #98480 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
It's American politics, it's like picking the personality of a puppet.
#98485 to #98483 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Gotta have hope.
#98486 to #98485 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I don't, the system is rigged. You need to change the game.
#98487 to #98486 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I'm just one man, how can i save the republic ey.
#98488 to #98487 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
You don't save a rotten corpse, you let it die. But you can always add more fuel to the fire.
#98491 to #98488 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Can't, I'm a patriot. No matter how much it's been tainted I still love it, I can't stop.
#98492 to #98491 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Being a patriot is no excuse for you to be a cuck. Don't be a cuck m8, find a new waifu.
#98493 to #98492 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
America wasn't always like this. It was great once, the greatest empire on earth. Can't I still love that one.
#98495 to #98493 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Don't live in the past.
#98496 to #98495 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
On some level we're all seeking to bring back the golden age, aren't we? You yourself want to return to a world without all this jewing, right.
#98498 to #98496 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Yes, but jewing started America. Almost literally. It's still based on gommie : DDD principles similar to the ones that started the Frenchie revolution. If you timer back to zero, it will be the same in the future if you go with the same principles.
#98500 to #98498 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I disagree, there were always some contributing factors to the end result we have now, the mass importation of slaves, the unwillingness to deport the emancipated slaves back to africa, integration, ect.

But when you look at the USA as a whole there were some truly great points. The removal of the red man was particularly inspired, as well as the spanish american war. These were not the actions of a cuck my shit up shill nation, but a nation committed to a WASP americana.

The baby boomers set us over the edge, and from a historical perspective that was fairly recent.

Is it wrong to dream of a pure republic that can inherent Rome, like it was meant too.
#98502 to #98500 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
A republic could never work, even with perfect men.
#98504 to #98502 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I agree that the system far from perfect, but I would say that almost any system, especially a republic, can work with perfect men.

Some reforms will need to be made, and there would have to be a period of staunch military governance during the transition to eliminate the parasites and traitors, but I believe it could work.
#98510 to #98504 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Do it, just do it
#98511 to #98510 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Cant, i am a slave to impulse.
#98512 to #98511 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
But I'm not a fond to the republican way of rule. I'm already living in
>freedom and democrucy : DDD
>3 bresidents, liderally : DD
#98513 to #98512 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
eyy
#98515 to #98513 - schnizel
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Rib in beace Gaisar : (((
#98452 - enlightednatzie ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
台灣 台北捷運Taipei MRT Racist 標準種族歧視 妨礙名譽之公然侮辱 事件 - 清醒夢
#98571 to #98452 - anon
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
"Ching chong racial purity you dip!"
#98456 to #98452 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply +2
(11/12/2015) [-]
Good man. Standing up for his people.

The ""white"" guy is a racetraitor, although i am also happy he did not poison our genetic pool back home. Not like hes able to get any women if he needs to go all the way to china, though.
#98479 to #98456 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
They're probably just in love and see past the bullshit race issues you have.
#98481 to #98479 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Petty emotion does not validate the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution and generations of cultural doctrine.
#98482 to #98481 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
They're evolving further, they're not sacrificing.
#98484 to #98482 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Miscenegation is not evolution. Evolution entails the process of adapting to an environment. When two groups, both of which have adapted to radically different environments, reproduce, the end result is offspring which has none of the parents advantages in either environment. Thus, reducing survivability.
#98489 to #98484 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Bullshit.

www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

Article reporting on a university of Edinburgh study showing the benefits of having more genetically diverse parents.
#98503 to #98489 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Here is an opposing source as well, from OECD's PISA
#98528 to #98503 - redandgreen
Reply -2
(11/12/2015) [-]
Academic results do not equal intelligence.
#98560 to #98528 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Nor does higher levels of education, by that logic
#98573 to #98560 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(11/13/2015) [-]
They don't. Do you understand what intelligence is?
#98642 to #98573 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Your """"study"""" directly said that mixed race gives more intelligent offspring, and then referred to "years in education"....
#98655 to #98642 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Better cognitive skills as well as more years in higher education.....
#98659 to #98655 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
And how did they test cognitive skills, do you think?
#98798 to #98659 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(11/16/2015) [-]
Probably through cognitive testing. Look it up.
#98826 to #98798 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/16/2015) [-]
"cognetive testing"

Like what, iq tests? I thought they were skewed in the direction of whites. There is no other reason for the massive gap between blacks and whites at the same income level, right?
#98827 to #98826 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(11/16/2015) [-]
Cognitive testing, not "cognetive".

Google it.
#98874 to #98827 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/17/2015) [-]
List of cognitive tests:
Intelligence quotient
(IQ tests)
Which also, coincidentally, show (as mentioned) that whites, asians and jews are 30++ points more intelligent than blacks, abbos, and mexicans, yet you blindly believe one but not the other. Typical leftist rhetoric

Top kek
#98501 to #98489 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Not a whiff of socialist leftism here

Especially considering mentioned studies were not cited, only mentioned. Give me a peer revied paper mentioning this and i will gladly concede.
#98527 to #98501 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
The Daily Mail is probably the most right wing newspaper in Britain.....

Here's a link, you'll have to pay for the paper www.nature.com/nature/journal/v523/n7561/full/nature14618.html
#98561 to #98527 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Lel

The matter at hand here is not racemixing. It is homozygosity. The two are unrelated.

This study tackles the matter specifically.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

I have further treated the data, and, it shows mixed race babies consistantly have lower gpa scores, PVT scores, etc. than their best parent.
Eg, for white on black relationships:
Mix: 24.19
White:32.27
Black:15.45
Mean: 23.86
Note that the miniscule difference in mix (real results) vs mean (black+white/2) is most likely due to the uncertainty values, or factors left unaccounted for. Regardless, the offspring is significantly less likely to have a high GPA than their white parent.
The case is worse in black/asian relationships, in which:
mix: 18.79
Mean: 29.03
This means the child is significantly less likely to have a high gpa if he/she is mixed.

The largest difference in mean vs real result is for blacks on asians and asians on american indians, both yielding significantly lower GPAS (-10.735 and -7.245 respectivly). The least difference was white/asian relationships, with a reduction of 0.135 (considering the R^2 value, i assume this is statistical variance, and that the real value with centre around the mean)

To conclude, in simpler terms:
According to this article, mixed race children show no improvement in GPA, and if any it is most likely due to statistical invariance or owed to socio-economic conditions (eg, the large reduction in black/asian relationships).

However, they are significantly more likely to have behavioural problems, medical problems, bad family structure, etc.

When this paper is released, no media made any reports. However, when your text was released, concerning an entirely different subjects, the media jump to false conclusions. Just like under the "omg ice age 2030" bandwagon.
#98575 to #98561 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
The paper does not control for any cultural factors, such as discrimination (probably from asshats like you) skewing the results.

I'd also add that your claim doesn't even hold true for all cases in the study.
#98641 to #98575 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
My claims hold true for the vast majority. Some cases are of course exceptions.

And discrimination hardly exists in the west anymore. Your paper was even more flawed, if that is the case, as affirmative action means that it is far easier for minorities to get into education than others.
#98656 to #98641 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Discrimination hardly exists..... LOL

There is no affirmative action in the UK where the data was drawn from.

Any other dumb arguments?
#98658 to #98656 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Mention one case of systematic discrimination.

I stand corrected, affiramtive action is not a factor. Regardless, poverty and such still is. Not that it matters, considering your study is not even about mixed races, but homozygosity.

#98457 to #98456 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
That may be the most beta thing anyone has ever posted on this board.
#98459 to #98457 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
You like gooks, dont you thumbfortrump?You racetraitor?
#98460 to #98459 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Really.
You think I, Donald Trump, like chinks.
#98461 to #98460 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Seems like you do, considering you are defending this faggot.
#98462 to #98461 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I am defending the white guy, you complete idiot.
Are you on drugs?
#98463 to #98462 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Yes, you are defending a race-traitor cuck.
#98464 to #98463 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
How the fuck does that make you think I like chinks when I am supporting the white guy. Holy fuck you are one retarded piece of shit, son.
#98466 to #98464 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Supporting someone directly advocating for anti-white sentiments (in this case yellow fever), even if that person is a perfect aryan (in this case he is gene trash), is still racial cuckoldry
#98469 to #98466 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
You still haven't answered my question you dumb shit. How am I liking chinks when I am supporting the white guy? Please elaborate instead of changing topic with your moronic /pol/ buzzwords.
#98470 to #98469 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
You are showing anti-white opinions, considering you are defending a white who is racemixing, and since racemixers are race traitors, you are thereby supporting a race traitor, and thereby supporting anti-white sentiments.
#98471 to #98470 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
>supports the white dude
>"hurr ur showing anti-white opinions"
Race mixing? Who the fuck cares? I simply have no issues with a white dude screwing a chink girl, if you do, you should probably get your beta ass virginity taken soon.
No one wants to because you're probably either a dirty muzzle or drunk slav, which means your women are already, of their own free will, choosing white men in Western countries. Perhaps you should consider suicide?
#98473 to #98471 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I am norwegian. Blond hair. Blue eyes.
If you have no issues with a white dude screwing a chink girl, then by the same logic you would be fine with a black dude fucking a white girl. Thats racial cuckoldry.
#98474 to #98473 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
>"racial cuckoldry"
It's called freedom son. I don't know if you've heard of it in your meaningless little socialist state of yours. Not that anyone cares of course, you and your fellow börks are irrelevant either way.
#98477 to #98474 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Freedom to destroy ones race and culture is the same type of freedom as the freedom one has to vandalize a national monument.

Both are heinous acts, in my eyes.
#98505 to #98477 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Why the fuck do you think you have any right to say what others are allowed to do with their own body?
#98517 to #98505 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Can i quickly twitch my arms freely while having another person in headlock then, and not be accused of murder? I am only manipulating my own body
#98518 to #98517 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Those two examples are not even remotely comparable.
#98647 to #98518 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/14/2015) [-]
Yes. The third party is our future. Humanity _ should only_ work for the future, and thus anything affecting the future negatively is by extension inherently malicious.

It is similar to climate change - manipulating the world around us, and thus destroying all notions of sustainability, is inherently negative. So is mixing races.
#98567 to #98518 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
It does affect a third party though - the future generations.
And assisted suicide is not legal in the US, is it? So the US does not have liberty after all?
#98569 to #98567 - thumbfortrump
0
(11/13/2015) [-]
The US does have liberty, but not to its full extend, which is reprehensible.
And I disagree that it affects third parties. The only "third party" affected is the offspring from procreation.
And to say the baby has to give its consent to be conceived is pretty much a paradox.
#98562 to #98518 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/13/2015) [-]
(reply limit hit)

But a murder with two consenting parties is still murder.

But regardless, race mixing still drastically deprecates ones biological prowess. See abovementioned studies.
#98565 to #98562 - thumbfortrump
0
(11/13/2015) [-]
Only in some countries. I Switzerland, for example, it is perfectly legal to receive help to die, if that is what you wish. In several other countries where it is illegal, there are specific provisions for murder with consent with much more mild punishments.
Also, you definitely see many people who actually believe that is should be legal for one to kill another, if clear consent is given. Mostly it is illegal because of the risk of a consent not being clear, and you risk people taking advantage of it, e.g. you kill someone, and then claim that he gave consent.
Whether or not race mixing is bad for our genes and mocks our evolutionary heritage is not something I am going to delve in.
People should have the right, to the fullest extend, to do whatever they want to themselves, or others (with consent), as long as it does not harm or affect third-parties in a negative way. Of course, there has to be limit to who can give consent (age limit and not being mentally ill), but other than that, it is for themselves only to decide what to do with their lives and bodies.
#98520 to #98518 - drastronomy ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Yes. Both actions are simply ones choices regarding ones own body. Both end negatively. Same applies to going around naked in some city. Its your body, but its still indescent exposure.
#98521 to #98520 - thumbfortrump
0
(11/12/2015) [-]
No. As someone who knows the law and has studied for a few years, let me tell you why.
In both your examples there is no consent from the other person(s). When two people procreate, however, there is consent from the people involved.
You are not involved in this procreation, hence you have no saying in what they do.
#98451 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/12/us-usa-college-protests-idUSKCN0T116W20151112

"I'm going to protest because I made bad decision that only affect me"
#98530 to #98451 - spammin
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I have an idea. Let's only cancel the debt for people who got themselves worthwhile degrees and give a big middle finger to the "I WANTS MUH FREE STOOFS!" crowd.
I have an idea. Let's only cancel the debt for people who got themselves worthwhile degrees and give a big middle finger to the "I WANTS MUH FREE STOOFS!" crowd.
#98448 - dehumanizer ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
#98468 to #98448 - anon
Reply +3
(11/12/2015) [-]
>Crying for your fellow shitposters for help

Tsk. tsk. What kind of army were you a part of again?
#98472 to #98468 - dehumanizer ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
jun pls your 50 accounts wont save your yid ass
#98450 to #98448 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Show me a situation where muslims aren't the victims.
Pro tip: its fucking impossible yo
#98440 - anon
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Hey guys!

I was wondering what you guys thought of my nuclear sub-marine that launches nuclear torpedoes with nuclear warheads for a nuclear war!
Thought it make the warheads rainbow colored x DD nvm too gay

Stayed up all night drawing this x3

constructive criticism is ok but no hate pls
#98442 to #98440 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
nuclear weapons are frowned upon and you will lose lots of friends
#98441 to #98440 - thumbfortrump
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
1. You didn't make it.
2. That was "leaked" by Russian media.
3. Russia does not have the capabilities to launch torpedoes that can travel over thousands of miles, even though that is what they claim.

This is just Russia trying for the 100th time to scare Westerners with the only military asset they have that actually matters: their nuclear arsenal. Which is becoming increasingly obsolete.
#98439 to #98435 - thumbfortrump
Reply -2
(11/12/2015) [-]
"Judge Johansen cited research that children do better when they are raised by heterosexual couples."
I'm gonna need some source on that.
#98436 to #98433 - pebar
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
I forgot aol existed
#98424 - pebar
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
Rand Paul Corrects Donald Trump's Comments on China Being A Part of TPP Based Rand Paul
#98445 to #98424 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
He was totally prepared for this, he knew Trump was going to drop China in the argument.
#98438 to #98424 - thumbfortrump
Reply -1
(11/12/2015) [-]
I never suggested that China was a part of TPP, you humongous cocksucker.
#98430 to #98424 - akkere ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
theintercept.com/2015/11/11/trump-was-right-about-tpp-benefitting-china/?comments=1#comments
Ignore the article of the title; the context to how TPP benefits China isn't even close to what Trump was shoehorning with his beaten dead horse of "currency manipulation". There are benefits and advantages for China to take advantage of the agreement for, however, even if they aren't direct signatories to the agreement (which is probably why they didn't sign it in the first place). This is probably going to be the "I told you so" link in response to the video by his supporter base, as shown in the comments of the video.
I think what happened with the debate is Trump learned from his campaign correspondence (the same group that's responsible for the detailed policies on his website and the reason that has an active plan while his interview responses convey nothing of it) about a link between the TPP and China, but either missed the memo or simply didn't read it, and tried to shoehorn the same soundbyte he's been hammering for a good half of his campaign.
#98431 to #98430 - akkere ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/12/2015) [-]
Ignore the title of the article*
#98421 - studbeefpile
Reply +1
(11/11/2015) [-]
#98423 to #98422 - studbeefpile
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
I don't give a fuck about either of them. I just thought the picture was funny.
#98420 - anon
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
#98419 - anon
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
#98414 - atonial
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
I fucking hate Marxists.

Why the hell would people be socialists knowing this to be the outcome?
#98416 to #98414 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
That isn't Marxism or Socialism.
#98417 to #98416 - atonial
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
They promote legislated equality, if they aren't cultural marxists then what are they? They certainly fall on the socialist side of the scale, they sure as hell aren't anarchists, nor libertarians.
#98418 to #98417 - anon
Reply 0
(11/11/2015) [-]
>They promote legislated equality
>Socialism
#98425 to #98418 - pebar
Reply +1
(11/12/2015) [-]
#98415 to #98414 - redandgreen
0
has deleted their comment [-]