Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (2): mahesuth, thumbfortrump, anonymous(4).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#103750 - enlightednatzie
Reply -1
(01/18/2016) [-]
#103749 - enlightednatzie
Reply -1
(01/18/2016) [-]
Reminder that breivik is a swedish hero that needs to be released imieatietly and sent to sweden to continue his campaign.
#103748 - enlightednatzie
Reply -1
(01/18/2016) [-]
Reminder that we must nuke norway and kill the few remaining norweigans. They didnt listen to breivik, they dont deserve to live.
#103747 - enlightednatzie
Reply -1
(01/18/2016) [-]
Should we nuke the netherlands and genocide all dutch people? I think their lftard mindset are soreading as a wildfire in europe. And yeah, nuke germany and genocide the germans while we're at it as a little buffert zone. And kill all danish people because quite frankly, they are all scum who doesnt deserve to live.
#103733 - thumbfortrump
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#103722 - lotengo
Reply +1
(01/18/2016) [-]
Geert Wilders: Male asylum seekers to be locked up in asylum centers

Completely on par with Trump.
BASED
A
S
E
D
#103734 to #103722 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Can't filter the Wilder
#103773 to #103734 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Man he's ugly and gay lloking as fuck.
#103725 to #103722 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Europe has an actual crisis to deal with, though. Trump's rhetoric on the matter is mostly fearmongering, i.e. whining about how Obama is making red states take them in or something when it's mostly private organizations dealing with them in the US.
#103718 - godisrippin
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
The Official Donald Trump Jam
#103721 to #103718 - lotengo
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
I'm not a fan of any of this, but its sorta growing on me. The fact that liberals attack this shows how desperate they are becoming
#103705 - theism
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Oil as a commodity is almost guaranteed to increase in price over time as supply is guaranteed to drop. Why then are oil futures not aggressively traded. You'd think once or twice you'd get a mass influx of purchases.
#103719 to #103705 - akkere
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Two problems in the equation; time, and the possibility of oil being rendered an obsolete source of energy. For oil to reach a desired selling point, it'll need to be be at such a limited quantity that the price is forced to continuously rise, unlike the current quantity now where the price can be arbitrarily lowered to ensure demand-by-price is preserved over alternate sources of energy.
With alternate sources of energy under constant research, it's a very big risk to sit on an oil future, wait, and hope that the rising price of oil doesn't further extend renewable energy research such that something comes up to easily convert oil-run machines and allow people to be effortlessly free of the necessity of oil.
#103717 to #103705 - whoozy
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Could go either way
Oil could be replaced as an energy source and become obsolete
#103712 to #103705 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Demand for oil is not as high as it has previously been in Western countries. Demand may increase in developing countries such as China or India, but it is probably not going to increase more in the West as we're becoming more self-sustaining and shifting to new energy sources.
#103713 to #103712 - theism
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Would that prevent you from selling oil futures at a later date? As long as the price goes up and you can sell it you make a profit.
#103714 to #103713 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Are you talking about storing it and selling it at an unknown date?
#103754 to #103714 - theism
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
No, purchasing oil futures on the commodities market. You never have to handle any oil you just own a portion of the hypothetical value of oil.
#103706 to #103705 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
or the stopping of illegal oil transport in syria and iraq really messed up the oil trade and price for oil processing company's. thus forcing them to go and lower the cost in order to sustain their benefits of buying and selling
#103703 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(01/18/2016) [-]
There isn't a demographic dumber than the anti police crowd.
#103704 to #103703 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
i give you the green light to go find and kill this idiot and i will be responsible for his killing.

Dear god, what kind of idiots swaeming this earth.
#103701 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
What did the western idiots expect from fleeing american/turkish supported terrorists?

peace and love?

HA HA HA HA HA!
#103698 - anon
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
#103709 to #103698 - anon
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
does the butthurt libcuck whose been spamming the board for the past few months want to out themselves like they did at summer camp?
#103675 - canyou
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Has the Trump finally been stumped?
#103685 to #103675 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
Statically there's a greater chance of being hit by a lightning and a meteor at the same time than Trump being stumped.
Statically there's a greater chance of being hit by a lightning and a meteor at the same time than Trump being stumped.
#103686 to #103685 - canyou
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Oooo
#103649 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
People are praising Obama's Iran deal as a successful diplomatic exchange and furthering of relations, preventing conflict.

I'm reality all we've done is strengthened Iran's economy and resolve, and assured them that America will not stand in their way. If anything we've guaranteed future conflict in the middle east, and maybe even directly with America.
#103695 to #103649 - anon
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
>America will not stand in their way

You know, except for the whole international community telling them what they can and cannot do when it comes to uranium enrichment.
#103650 to #103649 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Exactly. This is appeasement policy 101. And it has never, ever worked.
The only right thing to do is continue sanctions. And if they continue developing nukes or threaten regional security, bomb them.
#103654 to #103650 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
He's doing exactly what Neville Chamberlain did in the days before WW2. History will see Obama as an appeaser, kneeling before Saudi kings as they kill homosexuals, and giving an extreme Islamic state access to nuclear weaponry.

Give it 10 years, the most peaceful era in human history will end.
#103684 to #103654 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
All US Presidents in the modern era have been friendly enough with the Saudis. Also, the relationship between the US and Iran is not remotely similar to that of the British and Germany before the second world war. Honestly, to compare Obama and Iran to Neville Chamberlain and Nazi Germany is just crazy.
#103708 to #103684 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
While the circumstances are different, the approach is the same, which "throw-a-bone" diplomacy, also known as appeasement.
It's about making the opponent give up his plan by giving him a treat, to avoid future conflict.
Chamberlain made a deal with Germany about Czechoslovakia promising peace in our time.
Obama made a deal with Iran about their nuclear program, promising future prosperity and stability.
#103688 to #103684 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Again, I'm not saying the circumstances are the same, but the policy is. The British were largely still paralyzed by WW1 to jump into a war, while the Germans were resentful against the allied powers for their policies against them after WW1. Iran also resents the US for the sanctions, history, and policy between the two.

And I don't like how we've tolerated Saudi Arabia for oil, I don't like how Obama bowed to their king, and Bush did the same thing. This particular thing is not an Obama issue. It's a US policy issue.
#103663 to #103654 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I wouldn't say it's exactly the same, since before WWII the rest of the West generally thought the Nazis were the coolest shit ever and should be emulated. Saudi Arabia is such an affront to contemporary sensibility that if they didn't have oil, they'd probably be a crater.
#103666 to #103663 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I'm talking more in terms of appeasement tolerance, and general shows of weakness. In the manner Obama has dealt with Russia, Iran, and the Islamic State, you can draw many idealistic parallels with Chamberlain.
#103668 to #103666 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
In effect, sure, appeasement is rarely not pathetic. But material and ideal motivations are substantially different: as awful as it is to think, the US economy would shit the bed if we didn't kiss Middle Eastern ass, at the very least because petroleum companies are huge pissants that are used to getting their way.
#103671 to #103668 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I don't entirely agree with the oil part, the US has had enough oil to sustain itself. Its one reason we became wealthy in the early 1900s. But we prefer to import oil, and save our reserves for emergencies, until recently anyways. It's one reason has is so cheap, OPEC is flooding the market in an effort to nudge out US oil.
#103677 to #103671 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
An economic crisis that could have been avoided is still just that. Mind you it's political suicide to be responsible for anything that negatively affects personal lives.
#103648 - canyou
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I'm listening to the 6th republican debate. I gotta say, Trump needs to stop focusing on Cruz being born in Canada. Altogether I think he did much more poorly than usual.

Also how come it seems like Cruz and Rubio are always put against each other?
#103715 to #103648 - soundofwinter
Reply +1
(01/18/2016) [-]
They're the mainstream candidates that fox/republicans want to win. Trying to make them fight so one gets more appeal than the other.
#103716 to #103715 - canyou
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Do you think either could beat Hillary in the polls? I think Cruz might.
#103759 to #103716 - soundofwinter
Reply +1
(01/18/2016) [-]
Cruz might but Rubio is too god awful to come even close. Doesn't even show up to his job
#103646 - marinepenguin
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
This is great.
#103691 to #103646 - pebar
Reply +1
(01/18/2016) [-]
best line in the series
#103699 to #103691 - anon
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
The Rebel Alliance were literal terrorists lol.
#103700 to #103699 - pebar
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
#103665 to #103646 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I always ask people I know who like Bernie to take a step back, look at him and think of him as 'president'.

Usually makes them change their mind.
#103647 to #103646 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
So isn't this. Though they'd both probably be Sith lords.
#103687 to #103647 - akkere
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
In the context of Star Wars, they'd strike me more as rival Separatists (the ones that didn't have lightsabers), in that they both intend to resist the current political hold of government of the Two-party system with brash views (like how the Separatists wanted to resist against the Republic).
The molds of a Jedi, Sith or simply Dark Jedi, don't exactly fit a modern politician, even if you try to consider Palpatine.
#103653 to #103647 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Neither of them are that bad, it's their supporters that can be cringeworthy.
#103655 to #103653 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I said that mainly because they both rely on scapegoating and hatred to secure their base. Trump with illegals and Muslim extremists which I don't entirely disagree with , and Sanders with the 1% and Wall Street. Appeal to emotion, which the dark side panders to and encourages.

Sadly that's also how most candidates try to secure votes.
#103656 to #103655 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Well, ISIS and Wall Street are genuine threats to civilized society. It makes sense that people hate them.
#103661 to #103656 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Well sure. But they're still capitalizing on it. I agree more with Trump far more then I do Bernie, but Bernie has the Wall Street and banking dialed in pretty accurately, if he wasn't a straight up socialist ideologist I'd be more akin to voting for him if he got the nomination. I don't like how Bernie attacks the 1%, when it's a few dozen multibillionaire and their multiple companies. I also don't like how Bernie doesn't consider radical Islam a threat in any manner.
#103667 to #103661 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Good point, but Sanders has made anti-ISIS statements in the past: feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-isis/

Trump and him are similar on this issue, the difference is in how they think domestic Muslims factor in. Trump's positions would make a lot more sense in Europe with their stupid neoliberal Schengen crap.
#103670 to #103667 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Well every candidate is anti-ISIS. From what I've seen, he doesn't consider ISIS a representative of Islam though.
#103679 to #103670 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I don't have a problem with that since even other fundamentalist Muslims think they're apostates.
#103639 - anon
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
So, if a Republican becomes President, how long will it take for FJ to hate him and become a bunch of radical left-wingers?
#103711 to #103639 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Also obama has been president for years and FJ still defends him to the death 9 times of 10, your logic is flawed.
#103723 to #103711 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
People still defend him because like 98% of criticism leveraged against him is ass pulled nonsense. There are still people who believe that he's a Muslim communist or whatever the fuck. As such, people take genuine criticism of his policies with a grain of salt. Even when Bush was president, most of the awful shit attributed to him was autonomous decisions by his cabinet members and Congress.
#103724 to #103723 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
"People still defend him because like 98% of criticism leveraged against him is ass pulled nonsense."

Nah, liberals are over protective of their cool meme candidate. 90% of the criticism leveled against him is valid.

"There are still people who believe that he's a Muslim communist or whatever the fuck"

And there are people who believe hes the greatest president in history who has saved our country for all of time with the power of tolerance, whats your point.

"As such, people take genuine criticism of his policies with a grain of salt."

Not people, liberals, and they use the whole shaker.
#103726 to #103724 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
>liberals liberals liberals liberals

Sorry people who disagree with you exist. It must be painful.

And yes, it is mostly bullshit criticism. www.snopes.com/politics/obama/obama.asp
#103727 to #103726 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
"Sorry people who disagree with you exist. It must be painful. "

Ya, its so unreasonable that I would think that liberals would be inclined to defend obama, this means that I'm upset that people disagree with me, somehow. You'd think that with age you'd get better at arguing, not worse.

If you expect a checklist from a website run by two Canadians living in California to change my views on the last 8 years you're dumber than I thought, and thats saying something.
#103728 to #103727 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Documented evidence of people lying doesn't change your opinion?
#103729 to #103728 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
The people providing the documents and the way they interpret the facts matter to me.
#103730 to #103729 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Otherwise known as ad hominem.
#103731 to #103730 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
What? No it isn't.

Wait a moment, do you really not know what an ad hom is? You've said it so many times I just assumed you knew what it was.

What the fuck lol
#103732 to #103731 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
You're criticizing them personally instead of what they say on their site. It's not hard to grasp.
#103735 to #103732 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Questioning the credibility of a source =/= insulting someones character in place of an argument, you idiot

#103736 to #103735 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
You literally said "a website run by two Canadians living in California".
#103737 to #103736 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Yes, I questioned their credibility by suggesting they might be biased.

Would it be an ad hom if you question the credibility of a reporter because he works for Fox News or is from a far right background?

Why are you so stupid?
#103738 to #103737 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
They're biased because they're Canadians from California. Brilliant.

They cite evidence in their articles, so if they are biased, that is an accusation that requires evidence on your part.
#103739 to #103738 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
If there was a website that made the claim that Bush was perfect, and the people behind the site were based in South Texas, you'd consider the same fucking thing. Stop playing smart, you're not good at it.

I'm sure Fox sources their articles as well, yet something tells me you don't take their word as gospel. You know exactly what I'm talking about, your argument is disingenuous.
#103740 to #103739 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
An opinion is not a fact. Political blogs can have as many insane views as they want because they are subjective. The Snopes dorks write about things that are objectively true or untrue.

Fox's news reporting is rarely biased since they get enough views with their entertainment programming. It's their pundits that are fucking retarded.
#103741 to #103740 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Okay. It's a fact that blacks have a lower IQ than whites.

One person from a right wing site uses this fact to make the case that blacks are genetically inferior to whites and should be separated.

Another person from a left wing site uses this fact to make the case that blacks are oppressed in education and they need more assistance.

One fact can be interpreted in two different ways to favor two different ideologies.

If you don't understand how bias can effect the way things are interpreted, you're retarded. Maybe Snopes decided not to cover the sources that say negative things about Obama. Maybe they went out of their way with a confirmation bias to find positive things for Obama. Maybe they ignored interpretations of facts that condemned Obama and searched for the ones that praised him. There are plenty of ways bias can effect their "studies."

Of course you know all this, like I said. You're just being disingenuous right now to enhance your argument.
#103742 to #103741 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
"Maybe Snopes decided not to cover the sources that say negative things about Obama."

And what evidence do you have to support this? That is what neither of the theoretical morons in your examples understand, that philosophical and scientific discourse are fundamentally distinct.
#103744 to #103742 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Saying that something is scientific doesn't make it scientific.

"And what evidence do you have to support this?"

What evidence do I have that people are purposely not reporting things? None, obviously. It's an impossible thing to prove. But maybe theres a reason you don't see Fox News articles about violent Republicans and Huffington Post articles about violent liberals. Food for thought.
#103710 to #103639 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
They already are when it comes to certain issues.
#103636 - godisrippin
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
You guys in a nutshell
#103743 to #103692 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Kill yourself.
#103642 to #103636 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
There's only a few openly racist individuals on this board.
#103643 to #103642 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Also this. This board is far from some right-wing hivemind.
#103689 to #103643 - theism
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I would say this board has more of a right-wing leaning but more in terms of economic and social conservatism but only a couple of nuts actually take it to that level.
#103779 to #103689 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Socially i would say most of the board is rightist, but that is because its fucking retarded to support the leftists who are actively censoring the media and even admit it to "curb right extremism"

Economically though, we are as diverse as can be.

When it comes to racism: only a small minority is racist, but most people are patriotic - meaning they value their own people in front of foreigners, which is not racist, as it is unrelated to race.
#103780 to #103779 - theism
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Leftists aren't the only ones censoring the media though. Look back at Nancy Reagan and her entire crusade to "protect the children".
#103873 to #103780 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(01/19/2016) [-]
Cannot seem to find anything about her and censorship. Care to explain?
#103897 to #103873 - theism
Reply 0
(01/19/2016) [-]
My bad I was thinking of Tipper Gore who's actually a democrat.

www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-politics-of-stifling-speech/2015/08/10/724d2a62-3f9c-11e5-9561-4b3dc93e3b9a_story.html

Not the best article but I'd say it's right about conservatives preferring to censor discourse that doesn't fit Christianity.
#104031 to #103897 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(01/20/2016) [-]
Kek

I agree to some extent that christian conservatives can censor at times, however that is mostly due to fundamentalism and not an ideological tenet of conservatrism
#104051 to #104031 - theism
Reply 0
(01/20/2016) [-]
Political correctness also isn't a fundamental tenet of liberalism.
#104289 to #104051 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(01/22/2016) [-]
You would be right if you referred to classical liberalism, which is basically pseudo-regulated libertarianism.

Modern liberalism, however, strives to censor any and all phrases that may offend an "opressed minority". That is because their entire ideology revolves around the notion that they are oppressed and that it is our duty to protect them to the fullest extent. Religious overzealoutry is not a product of conservatism (examples: Poland, Hungary, Russia), but political correctness is a product of liberalism (see: every fucking university now a days)
#103672 to #103643 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Although racism is usually associated with the right-wing you can be left-wing and racist.
#103673 to #103672 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
That's pretty rare.
#103690 to #103673 - pebar
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Have you ever seen a liberal react to a black republican?
They are unbelievably racist then

uncle tom
race traitor (they actually say it)
sell out
etc.
>>#103672
#103786 to #103690 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
I haven't, no.
#103676 to #103673 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
It's rare in the West but the communist parties in the USSR and China were/are quite racist.
#103678 to #103676 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Yes, but I'm referring to the picture and its 4chan stereotype.
#103680 to #103678 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
OK, I don't really know what that stereotype is.
#103682 to #103680 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Pretty much this. Obese retards talking about genetic superiority.
#103644 to #103643 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Especially while people like Shiny and redandgreen frequent here. Plus Pebar is a libertarian I wanna say. It's a pretty politically diverse board for the internet honestly.
#103694 to #103644 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
It doesn't matter, they'll claim the board is /pol/ no matter what. Leftists thrive on a persecution complex.
#103674 to #103644 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I think the board is skewed to the right overall but it's true there are at least some people who aren't right wing.
#103693 to #103674 - anon
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
name the far right wing posters
#103637 to #103636 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
>racists here post on accounts
>racists in picture posting as anons

Can you decide?
#103638 to #103637 - godisrippin
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
FJ accounts aren't much different to posting anonymously on 4chan

It's not as if this is facebook and we're associating out FJ accounts with our real life peers
#103640 to #103638 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
It is very much different. Sounds like you haven't been on half-chan.
#103660 to #103640 - anon
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
"half-chan"

So I guess that means you're one of these faggots that worships the cripple with a dead website?
#103664 to #103660 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Why don't you show yourself, faggot? I'm not the one hiding like a bitch anon.
#103641 to #103640 - godisrippin
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
This is a small site, and posting here if you're sensible enough to not post any personal information about yourself offers you the same level of anonymity as an anonymous imageboard

You can post all your opinions here without fear of anyone from your IRL social circle stumbling across your posts and associating them with you

the 'anonymous' was never the point of the picture anyway, however
#103619 - lotengo
Reply +6
(01/17/2016) [-]
Several 'people' from my country went to Syria to fight on the side if ISIS, like many muslims from Germany, Brittain, France etc did.

When they come back they get a small army of social workers to get them back on track.

Former military Jitske Akse also went to Syria, only to fight AGAINST ISIS.
Tho he does not get a small army of social workers, he's being charged with murder.

Not a lot we can do about it at this point, but i hope you guys could take a few seconds to fill in this petition

www.petities24.com/steun_jitse_akse
_>voornaam = first name
>achternaam = last name
>plaats = name of the town you live in
>land = country
>email = email
>If you click 'nee' your vote is anonymous
>They will never publish your email
_
Article
www.elsevier.nl/Nederland/achtergrond/2016/1/Wordt-Nederlander-die-tegen-IS-vocht-vervolgd-voor-moord-2746677W/?masterpageid=158493
#103745 to #103619 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Holy shit, negerland pretty much is the laughing stock of the world. You guys are total cucks and should be nuked. LMAO.
#103627 to #103619 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Leftists have the power. Those with power write and control history.

I can think of no other option to save civilized society than to remove progressive influence from our power structure. For too long we've been frightened by media portrayal, scared of any number of opportunistic buzzwords. Scared into inaction. We're afraid of being called "racists", "nationalists", "nazis", "fascists", "white supremacists" as in the society that marxists have designed these are the worst things a person can be.

The only way to fix this, to save everything we ever loved for ourselves and for our children, is to be brave. Bold men must tarnish their public image to right the wrongs of history. There is no other way.

We can lay down of course. Let it all go. Spend the rest of our days getting fat, stupid, content, and weak as our history burns and we embrace the mantle of last men. That is an option. A valid option even.

The price for saving ourselves may be too steep a cost. We would have to do unspeakable things to our enemies, to our allies, and even to ourselves. Betray the entire notion of "right an wrong" that the media puts forward, and install our own morality. Many people would have to die, many people with good intentions, and many of your closest friends. Families will have to fight families, friends against friends.

We would have to give up everything, even our lives, and even then it may not be enough. Sacrifice is never easy, else it would not be a sacrifice. Nobody wants to make the hard choices for the greater good. I don't want to make them. But the men who have the courage and the resolve to make that choice will be heroes.
#103746 to #103627 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(01/18/2016) [-]
Nah its just dutch cucks in action.
#103669 to #103627 - anon
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
This is why people think you are retarded.
#103659 to #103627 - anon
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
How hard were you stroking your dick when you typed this?
#103623 to #103619 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I really hope things turn out better for him, but an online petition has never done anything in politics other than give PA reps smartass propositions to respond to. They're prosecuting him for killing marauders from a self-declared sovereign state, so they've probably given up on logic.
#103624 to #103623 - lotengo
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
In this fucked up hipster hippie country a petition might help a bit.
#103625 to #103624 - Shiny
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
I figured I'd sign but I can't find the US in the list (though the USSR comes up easily) since I don't speak romanticized squiggles.
#103707 to #103625 - stormklaw
Reply +2
(01/18/2016) [-]
* moon runes
#103626 to #103625 - lotengo
Reply +1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Just typ in Amsterdam and Nederland, they dont check anything.

Random name, could evn be your own name since Amterdam is multiculti as fuck
#103618 - anon
Reply +2
(01/17/2016) [-]
#103611 - asotil
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Still think we should help the "refugees"?
#103634 to #103611 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Fucking animals.
#103621 to #103611 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
source?
#103629 to #103621 - alimais
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Egypt as far as I know
#103614 to #103611 - anon
Reply -1
(01/17/2016) [-]
Stop invading their countries you cucks!
#103635 to #103614 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(01/17/2016) [-]
Log in, you piece of shit.