Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds


Per page:
Order:
Latest users (4): cleomech, jewishcommunazi, pebar, whatley, anonymous(19).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#53631 - anonymous (12/11/2013) [-]
nothing better than seeing a bunch of kids pretending they know anything about politics
User avatar #53633 to #53631 - undeadwill (12/11/2013) [-]
Same fag.
User avatar #53637 to #53629 - Ruspanic (12/11/2013) [-]
This is pretty obviously satire. You need to login to view this link

0/10, not even rustled.
User avatar #53634 to #53629 - Shiny (12/11/2013) [-]
I cringed a lot harder at the fact that someone actually cared enough to make this board.
User avatar #53622 - EaTroFKITTENS (12/10/2013) [-]
the LGBT rights movement in my opinion is the most insulting thing to actual LGBT people
User avatar #53657 to #53622 - jewishcommunazi (12/11/2013) [-]
What do you think of gay pride parades? Personally, I think it's kind of stupid.
User avatar #53658 to #53657 - EaTroFKITTENS (12/11/2013) [-]
It's a big "Look at me, I'm different!" parade, and all it does is strengthen the hatred for gays while accomplishing nothing
User avatar #53660 to #53658 - jewishcommunazi (12/11/2013) [-]
Yeah, that's more or less the same way I feel about it.
User avatar #53628 to #53622 - lulzforhiroshima (12/10/2013) [-]
you can definitely put it that way
User avatar #53625 to #53624 - EaTroFKITTENS (12/10/2013) [-]
in my opinion at least

it kind of implies we aren't really people and had no rights to begin with and people are trying to make a big deal out of it and give us these so called rights
User avatar #53630 to #53620 - undeadwill (12/11/2013) [-]
Yeah we have Texas because we kicked Mexico's ass for it. That like saying the US belongs to Brian
User avatar #53610 - drastronomy (12/10/2013) [-]
why the fuck do people in poor countries(india, niggeria, middle east) mate like rabbits

for fucks sake, they are digging their own grave by having 10 kids instead of fucking trying to fix their overpopulation...
MUH WATURH!DAH WHATES NOT GIBING NOFF MONI!
User avatar #53655 to #53610 - pebar ONLINE (12/11/2013) [-]
because labor is valuable
User avatar #53636 to #53610 - Ruspanic (12/11/2013) [-]
All of what was said, and also many of these countries have historically had very high infant mortality rates, so people had lots of kids anticipating that some of those children would die before adulthood. Infant mortality rates have since gone down, but fertility trends have not yet adjusted to account for this.
#53623 to #53610 - valeriya (12/10/2013) [-]
What's below and It also depends on culture, like for example in China (Mostly pre-maoist revolution and somewhat before 1 child policy) was that when you grew old, aside your children would take care of you, and it's not uncommon in rural china to have 3 generations in one household because... Well it's just the way things are.
User avatar #53621 to #53610 - akkere (12/10/2013) [-]
The anon is right, lots of impoverished families might resort to producing children with the hopes of having them work their own jobs to in turn provide the family income. From what I've heard, a lot of illegal immigrant families, for example, will have several children that will eventually grow to be adolescents and work jobs, while the father of the family sits on some couch and watches TV all day.

Labor-based professions may also do this a lot, such as farmers. They'll have several children who'll work on the farm and help make it overall easier for the lead of the family (or boost production in general).

A major reason why more upper-class families might not have the same behavior (aside from hopefully not having questionable ethics) is because the price gap to having a child raised to an adolescent before they start producing income vs. the actual income they receive isn't worth it. These families will have to send their children to college as well as pay an extensive amount in aids for education before they sustain an income equivalent to the economic class bracket.

Families in impoverished countries/impoverished families in general aren't going to maintain a massive financial gap required to send their children to higher education and therefore higher class jobs, instead they just send them straight to the labor and get the income through quantity.
User avatar #53618 to #53610 - schnizel (12/10/2013) [-]
They are bored.
#53616 to #53610 - anonymous (12/10/2013) [-]
There's an old African proverb.

"A child doesn't just come with one mouth to feed, but two hands to work."

So yeah, mostly labor.
User avatar #53617 to #53616 - drastronomy (12/10/2013) [-]
*extreme water and food and shelter shortages in country?*
*LETS FUCK SO MUCH OUR ARMY KIDS REPAIR IT FOR US, THAT CANT BACKFIRE*
User avatar #53611 to #53610 - jewishcommunazi (12/10/2013) [-]
Those generally aren't the kind of people that get to have an education.
User avatar #53613 to #53611 - drastronomy (12/10/2013) [-]
local overpopulation m8
its easy to see you are doing something wrong when you have to share water that people shit in
User avatar #53614 to #53613 - jewishcommunazi (12/10/2013) [-]
Many illiterate people probably don't even know the correlation between sex and pregnancy.
User avatar #53615 to #53614 - drastronomy (12/10/2013) [-]
hwut

srs
User avatar #53609 - schnizel (12/10/2013) [-]
We Are Afrikaners And We Are Sorry
Muh opression
User avatar #53603 - tredbear (12/10/2013) [-]
Do you think that the Ukraine should stick with Russia or go with the EU and why?
#53600 - jewishcommunazi (12/10/2013) [-]
"I said Berlin Ball, not Berlin Wall!"
User avatar #53672 to #53600 - jewishcommunazi (12/11/2013) [-]
I now learned english-speaking countries call them Berliners instead of Berlin Balls. Also, that ours are bigger.
User avatar #53608 to #53597 - schnizel (12/10/2013) [-]
>muh opression
>muh whites made SA and lets kick em out
>now the country is bad without whites
>its their fault
User avatar #53574 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Tumblrisms: Thin Privilege
Tumblrisms: Cis-Scum
Tumblrisms: Headmates
User avatar #53593 to #53574 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
The comments are shockingly well-reasoned. Pretty much everyone else who criticizes social justice warriors on Tumblr is just as bad.
User avatar #53575 to #53574 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
no, no more tumblr
User avatar #53577 to #53575 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Tumblr
User avatar #53579 to #53577 - pebar ONLINE (12/09/2013) [-]
I think it's cool how when you put your cursor over the first eye, the "tumblr" strobes
User avatar #53582 to #53579 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
I'm doing my part to fight epilepsy
User avatar #53564 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Tumblrisms: White Privilege
User avatar #53591 to #53564 - jewishcommunazi (12/09/2013) [-]
dumblr
Video related.
User avatar #53570 to #53564 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Tumblr: A breeding ground of momentous, un-measurable ignorance and stupidity of the highest form.
I can almost feeeeeeeel that autism when I enter the site every time.
User avatar #53571 to #53570 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Its shit like this that make me want to become a nationalist
User avatar #53573 to #53572 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Look at this shit.
User avatar #53565 to #53564 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Tumblr needs to be destroyed.
0
#53563 - undeadwill has deleted their comment [-]
#53557 - repostsrepost (12/09/2013) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necklacing

Nelson Mandela, such a champion of human rights
User avatar #53534 - marymjc (12/09/2013) [-]
Can someone explain to me why American tax payers don't get to choose where their tax dollars go?
User avatar #53580 to #53534 - pebar ONLINE (12/09/2013) [-]
because federalism
User avatar #53581 to #53580 - pebar ONLINE (12/09/2013) [-]
top heavy federalism*
User avatar #53553 to #53534 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Because its the governments job and they aren't doing it right.
User avatar #53540 to #53534 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
Each American? Because it's an unholy bureaucratic nightmare.
Generally speaking? Because some chucklefuck decided that it would be a good idea to make budgets a suggestion instead of strict roadmaps.
User avatar #53541 to #53540 - marymjc (12/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, generally speaking. Thank you.
#53538 to #53534 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
Why don't we use our tax money to increase our per capita EBT income? Yes indeed, I choose 100% of my taxes, state and federal, to go into social-spending for poor youths.
Why don't we use our tax money to increase our per capita EBT income? Yes indeed, I choose 100% of my taxes, state and federal, to go into social-spending for poor youths.
User avatar #53547 to #53538 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
i lel'd
good one
User avatar #53544 to #53533 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
Reminds me of that South Park special about the homeless just constantly growing because of charity and the kids had to redirect all the homeless to California.
I had a thought that maybe a better idea would be to send the homeless to training academies and employment facilities - places where they can have a place to stay and have food, but also train for skills and be forced to maintain an obligation. It'd be expensive to build and start up, but probably more economical than maintaining the costs of social services we have now.
That was back in like, my junior year of high school, and I have no idea how feasible it would be now.
User avatar #53583 to #53544 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Problem is not many people want training they want handout.
User avatar #53592 to #53583 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
It would force them to take the training and maintain the obligation, instill a habitual work ethic into them and get them back on their feet with the intent to build something for themselves.
User avatar #53594 to #53592 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
Unions use to actually provide training and schooling. Now all they care about is money.
User avatar #53595 to #53594 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
True, they've become an overdemanding force that harms small business and other industries, but they're also a necessary evil in terms of providing a check 'n' balance for corporations and ensuring workers rights, like how in the show industry they prevent crew from needing to be worked 18 hours a day from a melodramatic producer.
Necessary evils are a bitch.
User avatar #53596 to #53595 - undeadwill (12/09/2013) [-]
They are necessary but not this necessary
User avatar #53542 to #53533 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
Ahahaha. I can get the reasoning behind it (not that it isn't a disastrous unintended consequence waiting to happen), but it just sounds so fucking mean. I love it.
User avatar #53519 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
German Jews would be the most superior and intelligent type of humans.
User avatar #53559 to #53519 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
>most intelligent
yes
>most superior
no
User avatar #53536 to #53519 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
wow i was only kidding...
User avatar #53528 to #53519 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
>implying race = intelligence
User avatar #53529 to #53528 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
>implying environment = intelligence
User avatar #53530 to #53529 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
What causes intelligence could be a wide variety of things. Race is not one of them.
User avatar #53589 to #53530 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
You make a smile.
#53531 to #53530 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
What "causes" a human's intelligence is a mixture of one's environment during development and one's genes, with the latter being more significant or having more correlation with IQ.
User avatar #53532 to #53531 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
There's no real evidence of that beyond statistics, and even those were taken by people who openly admitted that they have agendas--same goes for the strong environmentalists. The rapid changes in intelligence measurements over the last century make a predominantly genetic explanation very difficult to prove.
User avatar #53551 to #53532 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Not that i agree with byposted on the general scope of the matter, it is a fundamental fact that your gene's influence almost everything about you including intelligence of course. Weather that has direct or significant correlation with race, I don't know.
User avatar #53555 to #53551 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
Of course, but the genetic aspects of intelligence are probably so varied and widely dispersed that there's little, if any difference between groups. Obviously, average intelligence will differ between groups in general, but this is to be expected; it changes constantly.
User avatar #53535 to #53532 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
In anthropology you deal with statistics, especially when looking at intelligence. I know it is politically incorrect to say that Negroes are on average less intelligent than all other races, but it is a fact. And have you not observed their lower intelligences at least a few times in your life?

I understand it goes against the liberal concept of individuality to say that society exists in a racial social order of some sort, but it should be apparent that racial differences have developed as aggregated individual differences. That is to say that human development has grouped each precious "individual" into population clusters in regards to their locations on the globe and their respective lineages.

The rapid upward shift of human intelligence can be explained by the environmental factor in IQ. The hereditarian hypothesis does not claim that IQ is a measure solely dependent on one's race, but that there is a component of one's environment. And the shift does not disprove the basic Black-White-Asian theory.
User avatar #53539 to #53535 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
"I know it is politically incorrect to say that Negroes are on average less intelligent than all other races, but it is a fact."

It is not politically incorrect, it is just incorrect. There is a genetic aspect to intelligence, but we have yet to even single it out yet, all we know is that it exists. Trying to measure something empirical without statistics is inherently meaningless, and at most, speculative. Call me skeptical that several books with zero peer reviewing are "hard truths".

"I understand it goes against the liberal concept of individuality to say that society exists in a racial social order of some sort, but it should be apparent that racial differences have developed as aggregated individual differences."

This is because sociology is a bitch. The existence of nearly every racial stereotype has a historical and psychological explanation unrelated to genetics. You yourself have said that nobody is genetically predisposed to act a certain way as opposed to what they choose to do.
Even if there was some kind of racial barrier to intelligence, though, to treat them differently for it would still be inherently wrong. If anything, it would ethically make the welfare state a right. A strongly genetic explanation would also mean that many whites and Asians would also end up inferior, so by no means is a racial division defensible on a moral, ethical or logical level.

"The rapid upward shift of human intelligence can be explained by the environmental factor in IQ. The hereditarian hypothesis does not claim that IQ is a measure solely dependent on one's race, but that there is a component of one's environment. And the shift does not disprove the basic Black-White-Asian theory."

The Flynn effect has measured increases literally multiple times since IQ scores were recorded. You can't haplogroup your way into that. The IQ gap between blacks, Hispanics and whites has been decreasing for a while, so it seems silly to dwell on it now.
User avatar #53607 to #53539 - byposted (12/10/2013) [-]
>Even if there was some kind of racial barrier to intelligence, though, to treat them differently for it would still be inherently wrong. If anything, it would ethically make the welfare state a right.

Only within the framework of egalitarianism. On another note, we can say that ethically segregation was not so bad.

>The Flynn effect has measured increases literally multiple times since IQ scores were recorded.

Indeed, but never has the racial theory been debunked as a result of the Flynn effect. US Blacks have increased their average intelligence by multiple times, but they remain as they were eight decades ago: one standard deviation below US Whites in terms of IQ. Bear in mind that IQ tests have changed over the years, so this is a factor that must be controlled in the Flynn effect. Other than that, the Flynn Effect only proves that the expansion of education has benefited society as a whole. It does not, however, prove that race=/=intelligence.
User avatar #53606 to #53539 - byposted (12/10/2013) [-]
>It is not politically incorrect, it is just incorrect.

Are you dismissing the validity of IQ? Blacks have been shown time and time again to rank in the US one standard deviation below Whites on intelligence quotient tests. In Sub-Saharan Africa, Blacks score on average two standard deviations below Whites in the US. You know well of the adoption studies and those examining social-economic positions in society I presume, discrediting the environmental hypothesis, since we have established a genetic factor in intelligence. So it is not a question that Blacks have lower intelligences based on IQ, but whether or not IQ is an accurate system.

Schnitzel has posted a typical IQ bell-curve graph below. No anthropologist debates the results, they just dwell on reasons why it shows what is shows.

>You yourself have said that nobody is genetically predisposed to act a certain way as opposed to what they choose to do.

Nobody is genetically predisposed to "act" any certain way. Humans of all races are capable of abstract thought; Negroes are humans. In order to not believe so one would have to be an essentialist. Unfortunately, many project essentialist theory into racialism, and then proceed to destroy this, and, they believe, destroy racialism, by citing similarities between the races. This is called strawman tactics.

Negroes are stereotyped to be criminal. Lower intelligence makes one more likely to embrace criminality. If we take into account that the average US Black has an IQ of 85, what used to be considered as the threshold of mental retardation, Black crime is not a mystery. Intelligence has much more correlation with petty criminality than with social-economic position, that is for sure. IQ also correlates with those who are in car crashes; less intelligent people die from car crashes much more often.
#53562 to #53539 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit, we smart now.
User avatar #53578 to #53562 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
>implying you have any actual evidence that I have not mentioned
User avatar #53585 to #53578 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
Most blacks are dumb, and will be. There is nothing you can do to change that.
User avatar #53586 to #53585 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
Of course they're dumb. They're human.
User avatar #53584 to #53578 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
>implying you are nothing more than a desperate kid looking for excuses
User avatar #53587 to #53584 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
I've written a summary of the intelligence debate, and you've posted uncited, unsourced and untrustworthy pictures.
User avatar #53602 to #53587 - lulzforhiroshima (12/10/2013) [-]
his excuses are so god awful it made me laugh VVV
User avatar #53588 to #53587 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
Nigga I wiped my HDD a month ago or so and you talk like a woman.
BTW I gtg do homework
#53561 to #53539 - schnizel (12/09/2013) [-]
You are a good liar. Maybe one of the best on FJ.
#53527 to #53519 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
That's an oxymoron you know.
User avatar #53601 to #53527 - lulzforhiroshima (12/10/2013) [-]
Not really, we can both agree that Jews are on average very intelligent.
In my book intelligence = superiority.
User avatar #53502 - commission (12/08/2013) [-]
Invincible & Legendary, Soviet Military Music Concert - Несокрушимая и Легендарная Музыка Концерт

Communism is often criticized for its inability to create a sustainable economic system where people have incentive to perform efficiently and act ethically in their work. The abolishment of private property is often cited as a major cause for laziness and corruption. In non-communist societies, private property is often a “necessary motivation to work”, Giannis Starnatellos argues in his overview of computer ethics. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, the fathers of Communism, disagree and find that property actually stifles motivation to work in existing non-communist systems. In the Communist Manifesto, they argue:

It has been objected that upon the abolition of private property, all work will cease, and universal laziness will overtake us. According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those who acquire anything, do not work. The whole of this objection is but another expression of the tautology: There can no longer be any wage labour when there is no longer any capital.
User avatar #53503 to #53502 - commission (12/08/2013) [-]
Their argument makes the subtle assLiu Shaoqiumption that all resources in the world are evidently finite. Within non-communist societies, people compete ruthlessly to obtain the largest amount of resources and property for the end goal of wealth. Because property is scarce, once all capital is privatized, the incentive to work will be non-existent because all resources will be exhausted. Since all non-communist systems will eventually succeed to this condition, the only solution, Marx and Engels argue, is to ensure no privatization of property is allowed.
User avatar #53504 to #53503 - commission (12/08/2013) [-]
The introduction of computers and the computer industry into communism complicates finiteness of capital. Unlike the traditional sense of physical property such as land or factories, computers produce a new bountiful medium of ownership. Computers provide a means and way to create seemingly endless capital since the barriers of documenting ideas are significantly lifted through the use of applications and networking. The limited capital within the world, as described in the Communist Manifesto, has expanded to apparent infinity with the introduction of computing. Hence, the study of how computers have affected work motivation and ethics in Communism is needed.
User avatar #53509 to #53504 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
The problem is computing deals in infinite resources because data, information, and networking is infinite - certain solid physical resources, unless expressed through the subject of artificial synthesis, do not have the same advantage.
If resources were de-privatized, what would constitute an orderly consumption and distribution of these resources from the public without exhausting them?
User avatar #53506 to #53504 - Shiny (12/09/2013) [-]
Funny story: collectivism in technology is already a thing. And it already works. This website actually runs on a Russian web server that's maintained by a community of volunteers.
#53505 to #53504 - pebar ONLINE (12/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #53508 to #53507 - pebar ONLINE (12/09/2013) [-]
I was thinking more the thread in general
User avatar #53464 - lulzforhiroshima (12/08/2013) [-]
So... What's gonna go down with the whole Iran Nuclear shit?

The way I see it, they are gonna loose in all possible circumstances if countries start flexing nuts.

Most of western Europe is on Israel's side even France , America is our dog, Saudi Arabia is with us.
All Iran has is Russia.

They'd get taken down easily if Israel decided to launch an attack with or without Saudi Arabia on the nuclear sites and Iran decided to fight back.

The problem is that Iran has its nuclear facilities heavily guarded and like 50m underground.
#53526 to #53464 - byposted (12/09/2013) [-]
Absolutely nothing is going to happen unless the US decides to decrease relations with Iran and undo the progress made since the election of Rouhani. This is a very likely prospect, that Iran will be denounced for a breach in the deal sometime in the future by the IAEA under false pretenses so that jingoist sentiment against her can be reinstated at a vigor previously unseen. Indeed, it has happened once before and it very well may again.

Most of Western Europe is not at this point on Israel's side. The European states do not favor an end to diplomacy, Israel does. Netanyahu's plans for a global intervention in Iran is not particularly liked by Western statesmen. France is the most pro-Israeli in Europe by all means, having to do with the amount of Israeli influence in her political system, which is why "even France" in your post seems funny to me. Other than the French, European governments do not seem to take Netanyahu's cartoon bombs seriously.

Israel would never strike Iran by its own means. Iran is more than capable of defending her skies and Israel would need the support of American bases in the region to supplant this. In such a scenario, Washington, not Tel Aviv, has the ruling.
User avatar #53445 - undeadwill (12/08/2013) [-]
So was anyone surprised Obama is acting like Mendel was his idol after his death?
User avatar #53482 to #53445 - byposted (12/08/2013) [-]
Everybody saw it coming.
User avatar #53461 to #53445 - akkere (12/08/2013) [-]
Not a bad strategic move, but not a severely profitable one. It'll empower his momentum with a select group of people (e.g. Those that were against Apartheid, Communists or those of Communist thought, every African American ever), and the people he would be pissing off like those that dislike the violence that came under Mendela (especially his wife, oh my god his wife) most likely already disliked him intensely.
Maybe we'll find out his reasons in the obligatory "Shit I did in my terms and why" autobiography that every president nowadays comes out with.
User avatar #53510 to #53461 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Last i checked, Nelson Mendala was a bit commie himself. He actually praised some communist societies
User avatar #53548 to #53510 - oxan (12/09/2013) [-]
He worked with communists and was more than happy to accept their aid and support, but he was certainly not a communist himself. Granted, a lot of the nominally socialist world had collapsed by the time he became President, but there were nominally socialist states existing nevertheless. The lack of initiation of socialist construction in South Africa goes to show that Mandela wasn't a Commie.
User avatar #53552 to #53548 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Colin Freeman of The Telegraph has an excellent article detailing Mandela’s ties to the South African Communist Party. The article tells of a book by British historian Professor Stephen Ellis, who wrote about the Umkhonto we Sizwe receiving bomb making lessons from the Irish Republican Army and intelligence training from the East German Stasi, which they used to conduct brutal interrogations of suspected spies in the ANC.

After apartheid ended and Mandela was freed he wasted no time in lavishing praise on communists and thug dictators. In 1991 he and his wife Winnie went to Cuba, which they called their second home, to celebrate the communist revolution with Fidel Castro. While there he said, “Long live the Cuban Revolution. Long live comrade Fidel Castro… Cuban internationalists have done so much for African independence, freedom, and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban revolution. We too want to control our destiny… There can be no surrender. It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people.

Mandela also said of Cuba, “There’s one thing where that country stands out head and shoulders above the rest. That is its love for human rights and liberty.”

www.ldjackson.net/nelson-mandela-just-another-thug/
User avatar #53604 to #53552 - oxan (12/10/2013) [-]
Yes, Cuba trained ANC troops and one of the commanding officers of Umkhonto we Sizwe was a member of the Communist Party of South Africa. Today, the SACP is in a coalition with the ANC.

But just because Mandela was more than happy to accept the support of communists doesn't mean he was a communist.
User avatar #53511 to #53510 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
Yep, that's why I mentioned the appraisal of Mandela might've been intended to appeal to groups including those who prefer communist policies.
User avatar #53513 to #53511 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Ohhh sorry I read that wrong.
User avatar #53514 to #53513 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
No problemo, senior.
User avatar #53515 to #53514 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Ist un mexican?
I ist Juden
User avatar #53516 to #53515 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
Nope, though I'm half Puerto Rican, I'm whiter than white chocolate. I cut you with expensive knife
I don't really know a lot of Spanish though, and I sucked at it in high school.
Are you a member of the illuminati?
User avatar #53518 to #53517 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
gib sheckels pls
User avatar #53520 to #53518 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Fuck no, eat my shit you disgusting latin crap.
User avatar #53522 to #53521 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Puerto Inferior Recan

Superior Jew
#53543 to #53522 - recan (12/09/2013) [-]
I have been summoned!!!!
User avatar #53546 to #53543 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Holy crap, i fucking hate you idiots who join other people's conversations just because you have short names that get mentioned. Fuck off.
#53576 to #53546 - recan (12/09/2013) [-]
Lol, have a nice day too!
#53523 to #53522 - akkere (12/09/2013) [-]
but im whiter than white chocolate tho   
 I bet you can't even into matzah crackers
but im whiter than white chocolate tho
I bet you can't even into matzah crackers
User avatar #53524 to #53523 - lulzforhiroshima (12/09/2013) [-]
Bitch i eat mutzah scrambled eggs
User avatar #53459 to #53445 - lulzforhiroshima (12/08/2013) [-]
What did you expect?

At least Obama is trying to be a "peaceful" president. He hasn't really invaded anything if you find that good or not.
User avatar #53453 to #53445 - pebar ONLINE (12/08/2013) [-]
Obama does whatever he can to get attention..... he changed his stance on gay marriage right before his election just to score some extra points.
User avatar #53454 to #53453 - undeadwill (12/08/2013) [-]
And then.....Did nothing.

Seems to me he acts like that kid that knows famous people (Not really) But because of this makes him cooler.
 Friends (0)