Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (6): asotil, braus, jewishcommunazi, lotengo, mahesuth, marinepenguin, anonymous(3).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#105916 - pebar
Reply -2
(02/07/2016) [-]
#105929 to #105916 - alimais ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Yeah, but isn't it a bit of a corrupt system if corporations bribe aka "lobbying" politicians to look away on certain things?

Shit like this doesn't appear in America because it's a nice system

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ag-gag
#105978 to #105915 - commiekirby
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
Americans have an obsession with statism now I reckon.

Naw I think its more that they're just obsessed with their memetastic prez-o-dents.
#105882 - feelythefeel
Reply -1
(02/07/2016) [-]
No war not heavily considered is worth declaring, no war not faught totally is worth fighting, and no war not faught for the conquest of peace is worth considering. Therefore, it should seem as a matter of course that my view on warfare is this; Dedicate conservatively, operate liberally, and make peace in a bi-partisan fashion.
#105899 to #105882 - pebar
Reply +2
(02/07/2016) [-]
#105868 - nigalthornberry
Reply +2
(02/07/2016) [-]
I have never met anyone who supports hillary
#105912 to #105868 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
The demographic stuff which pebar posted previously suggested Hillary supporters tend to be older, if I remember rightly.
#105944 to #105912 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
And richer.
#105902 to #105868 - commiekirby
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I've only met Jeb and Bernie supporters. No idea where all these supporters of other candidates are outside dank maymays.
#105872 to #105868 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
A Bernie supporter is far worse.

We need to remember this, Hillary will do MINIMAL damage compared to Bernie. Regardless of honesty or intentions, Bernie is far worse.
#105909 to #105872 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
"every terrorist is dedicated to Islam"

Funnily enough, I haven't heard anyone except the right wing say that.

#105947 to #105909 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I like how you purposefully missed the point of the picture, thus actually proving the image's point.
-lulz
#105910 to #105909 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I think that says more about the left than it does about the right
#105911 to #105910 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
That people on the left are aware of what terrorism is and the fact (yes fact) that it isn't only committed by Muslims? Probably.
#105913 to #105911 - pebar
Reply +1
(02/07/2016) [-]
that people like Obama won't acknowledge the link between ISIS and islam
#105955 to #105913 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
President Obama: 'ISIL is not Islamic'

I think he does this because he doesn't want ISIS to be able to assert that this is an Islam vs US or Islam vs Christianity war.
#105875 to #105872 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Funny because most of them are against Assad, and Assad is a member of a Socialist party.
#105891 to #105875 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I literally can't see your comments, I can't unblock you, its glitched.
#105876 to #105875 - theism
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Blindly following people because they share superficial views with you is retarded.
#105890 to #105876 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
...I don't see how that relates to what I said...?
#105892 to #105890 - theism
Reply -1
(02/07/2016) [-]
You say it's contradictory for them to oppose Assad and support Sanders. It's really not though.
#105870 to #105868 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(02/07/2016) [-]
Unfortunately, I have.
#105864 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Finally got around to reading "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu. Well listening actually because aint nobody got time for amazon.

THE ART OF WAR - FULL Audio Book by Sun Tzu - Business & Strategy Audiobook | Audiobooks It's pretty good, check it out.
#105873 to #105864 - akkere
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Better to read the book imo. A lot of audiobooks insist on connecting the contents to business, which is fine of itself, but it kind of detracts from the central meaning of everything else.
#105867 to #105864 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Nazis burned that book.

I'll pass.
#105854 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
hey pebar

ever met a communist libertarian

/Arabs+again/funny-pictures/5824000/58#58

kek
#105878 to #105854 - totallytito
Reply -4
(02/07/2016) [-]
Wow you're so salty that you talk about me behind my back.
Ah thank you for making my weekend.

As the ancient hawaiians used to say;
"There are two ways to lose;
The strong can end a fight and remain silent, the weak share their woes with the world"

Become strong yourgaylol , I believe in you!
#105965 to #105878 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
ahahahahahaha
#105924 to #105878 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Being this retarded warrants being laughed at.

>im a communist libertarian
lol, and i am a fascist anarachist
#105930 to #105925 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
communism =/= socialism, and in any case libertarian socialism is not really socialism since it is against a large government.
#105931 to #105930 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/07/2016) [-]
Communism is the highest stage of marxism. Provided it's stateless, I'd say it's much more libertarian than the socialist stage, which in most cases has a state.

Libertarian socialism =/= state socialism (big government) I mean, duh.
#105917 to #105878 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(02/07/2016) [-]
"The strong can end a fight and remain silent"

Isn't silent.

"the weak share their woes with the world"

Tries to get the last word while sharing your woes with the world.

You're truly wise mr theme account.
#105883 to #105878 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I summon you to the board and you don't even talk to me
what kind of bullshit is this?

Are you an anarchist or not?
#105918 to #105883 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
When you summon dummies this is what you get.
#105919 to #105918 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
#105920 to #105919 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Is that from crocodile dun dee
#105921 to #105920 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
#105922 to #105921 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
close enough
#105884 to #105883 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I am not an anarchist.
I believe in a slightly less controlling government that functions as less of a boss, and more as a leader that shares some of the burden. I find it distasteful that the government can afford the military and exempting taxes from churches, but can't afford its own space program. It's sickening.

Essentially, I want what was supposed to be 'democracy' before the US turned it into "gimme dats".

I'm not a full communist, but I believe in some of their ideals of shared workload to reduce the chances of widespread poverty and promote industrialization of the US.

It's okay to outsource some work, but as an animator I feel disgraced by the fact that most of my work is outsourced while the formerly empirical animation industry in the US has been almost completely wiped out and replaced by cheesy CGI. This isn't the "illegals" fault, this is the employer's fault for outsourcing so damn much.

The workforce needs to be democratized and sustainable within the community.
Unfortunately, the way that republicans and fake democrats have screwed the economy, I'd have to combine two completely unrelated government systems just to achieve the original goal of democracy.

I know it's almost impossible, but a madman can have a little faith, right?
#105886 to #105884 - pebar
Reply +1
(02/07/2016) [-]
I see.
>What you're talking about has nothing to do with libertarianism. Under libertarianism, government acts as a umpire that enforces the "rules of the game" and maybe a few essential services such as a police force and a court system.
>To tax churches would be to tax people twice incidentally, taxing corporations is also taxing people twice . The people who go to church already pay taxes. And churches are funded by the people who go to church. The pastor, and anyone else the church employs, pays income tax.
>To have a "shared work load" through a government is the same as using mob rule to control the minority that doesn't agree with the majority. Under the system we currently have, as well as under libertarianism, you can still set up your own system were workloads and benefits are shared. They're called cooperations. Credit unions are a popular example.
>As far as poverty is concerned, capitalism has done the most to reduce the poverty of the widest range of people the world has ever seen. The places with the most people in absolute poverty are the places that have either extensive government or a history of communism.
>One of the biggest flaws of communism is its lack of innovation. People have no incentive to create new inventions if they don't profit from it to cover the development costs. Industrialization was the product of free market capitalism.
>Hating outsourcing comes from a pure lack of understanding of economics. People benefit the most by specializing in a field because that increase the productivity the most. People then trade with other specialists for what they lack. This is the best way to maximize productivity.
#105895 to #105886 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
pebar I want you to help me balance my nationalistic views with my pro-capitalism views. I want to believe in more right-wing economic policies but some of them for me seem to go against nationalism. Specifically free trade, am I wrong on that one and why?
#105900 to #105895 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Milton Friedman - Imports, Exports & Exchange Rates you care completely wrong on that
free trade benefits all countries involved because they can further specialize and focus on their strengths
it is pure fallacy to think that one country benefits at the expense of another country
#105889 to #105886 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
>>#105884, correction
they're called cooperatives, not cooperations
#105896 to #105889 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
thanks
#105887 to #105886 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Hm, that was actually very well said.
Guess I'll just be a regular democrat then.

I just don't want to associate myself with the leftist extremists, which are basically the rainbow-laden equivalent of rightwing extremists. I just kinda wish people didn't treat things in a black and white manner, you know?
#105893 to #105887 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I know pebar is trying to convince you to go libertarian, but trust me reactionary is where its at.
#105894 to #105893 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
No thank you.
#105897 to #105894 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Why not? Also are you white?
#105898 to #105897 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I'm asian, and I dislike trump because he is an extremist and I would rather not associate myself with such an ill-mannered man.

Nothing is black and white, and he does not see a grey line.
#105932 to #105898 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
asians being intelligent stereotype blow the fuck out
#105888 to #105887 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I understand
Just keep in mind that the economy is the interactions of literally billions of people. To have government intervene is to have government intrude on people's personal lives.
It's one thing to not want to waste money on a giant military, but to do all the things you say, you will have to have a larger government by necessity.
#105877 to #105854 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Monty Python- The Annoying Peasant
the only way to have both those at the same time is to be a full blown anarchist; there's no "communist values about it"

otherwise if you have a government, economic would have to be through that government. And as we all know, economic authoritarianism is still authoritarianism. This would be that antithesis of libertarianism

these types of leftists generally want to abolish government in order to abolish property right.
Keep in mind that anarchism is almost exclusively a leftwing idea. Anarcho-capitalism is a very small subset of it.

vid related - at 1:45 he says they're an "anarcho-syndicalist commune"
totallytito
#105903 to #105877 - commiekirby
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Interjecting here out of total curiosity since I find it difficult to find people that seem to enjoy Anarcho-Capitalist philosophy but also have an understanding of it beyond "MUH PROPERTY AYN RAND 4 LYFE"

Do you yourself consider Anarcho-Capitalism to truly be a version of Anarchism, despite its inherent hierarchy in the workplace and authoritarian mode of production? Or would you say that the term is merely nomenclature that's not gone away?
#105904 to #105903 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Anarcho-capitalists take the non-aggression principal waaaaayyyyy too seriously. They say that every single thing the government does is based on coercion and therefore immoral.

It has nothing to do with social classes, or anything like that so it's not leftwing, since those issues are what define the left.
But since it calls for the total abolition of government, I'd still call it a branch of anarchism
#105905 to #105904 - commiekirby
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
By that logic, they themselves would be coercive to their own degree.

Fair enough. I suppose nowadays ideas blend in all sorts of new ways, such as National-Anarchism on the subject of them to which that name too sounds like an oxymoron. I see the appeal of that more however.
#105874 to #105854 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I didn't know it was possible to be both of those things.
#105856 to #105854 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Totallytito is a whiny spastic autist who thinks he's profound because he posts a fat hawaiian from an outdated children's cartoon. Can't really expect much from that.
#105858 to #105856 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
you fool, you might've lead him here

now we might be flooded with mentally handicapped cartoon hawaiian marxism
#105859 to #105858 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
He blocked me so i don't think he'll get my notification.
#105860 to #105859 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
lol can you link the thread where he blocked you
#105861 to #105860 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I don't even know why he blocked me, i hardly recall even talking to him.
#105879 to #105861 - totallytito
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
I blocked you because you were streak-thumbing everything like a madman without even reading.
I'll unblock you in hopes that you'll act more mature from now on.

#105863 to #105861 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Aw that sucks, I love a good shitstorm.
#105855 to #105854 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
Oxymoron at its finest.
#105853 - drastronomy
Reply -2
(02/06/2016) [-]
Lets apply an allegory, before the topic is really introduced:
You and your family come from the working class. You have never had the money for your own house, and for the first time, after nearly starving to death, you miraculously manage to earn enough money to buy a descent house in the middle of a nice, high-class neighborhood after your boss dies and the son takes over, increasing wages and profit.
However, the people in your neighbourhood are not particularily friendly - they despise you because you came from the lower class, and some have even gone as far as to try to say you do not deserve your house.
This escalates, and soon everyone in the neighbourhood has denounced you. They try to burn down your house. You get revenge. however, by going to court and getting your neighbours garage in return for the property damage. You start hating everyone around you.
You ask your boss, a rich man living across town, for advice. You ask your boss for advice, yet he refuses to help and says you simply do not understand them, saying that he has met plenty of rich people and few have been bothersome, and that you must be doing something to anger them.
The conflicts keep going, and after a while your neighbours do not bother anymore due to the fact that they have started blaming each other for the criminal fines they have incurred. There are divorces and some of your neighbours move out, leaving their families in their homes, who are still attacking you
.
The next morning, your boss calls you and tells you they have become his neighbours, saying that they do are not bad people and that you are just envious of their richness. He soon finds they violate all neighbourhood rules and norms, but still keeps thinking they will adjust. Soon, they start burning his property too. He is still adamant that they are good people. His house is burnt down, and he defends them by saying there is no other place for them to live, despite the houses they came from still being there, inhabited by their families they left.
After a while, your boss starts blaming you, and threatens you with being fired. You try to be an example, and show how to manage them and tell them that they are indeed both their and your worst enemy. He replies, saying that you are lower-class scum, ignorant of the nature of higher-class living. The situation keeps worsening.
fin
Now: Do you benefit at all from some of them moving, despite all houses still being full, and that you are still attacked at the same rate?
Of course not, and you should feel pity for your friend who is so stubborn in his conviction that they are not all snobbish degenerates.

Now: replace your neighbours with "muslims", yourself with "Israel", and your friend with "Europe". Why the fuck would israel want to fuck over Europe? Why the fuck would they want to create a "slave race" of muslim interbred mutants that all despise them? Regardless of their lack of intelligence or whatever, hate conquers subservience.

If we are ever to get rid of the scourge that is plaguing Europe, we have to start with villifying the correct people: socialists and liberals. Jews have nothing to do with this, and in fact they suffer as well - tons of israelite lives have been lost to stabbings and terrorist attacks, and they now often live under fear and armed protection. Those jews who are zionists and yet also anti-white, are radicals, and are labeled as such by nearly all jews.

Inb4; le JIDF meme
#105862 to #105853 - anon
Reply -1
(02/07/2016) [-]
Nice mental illness you got there.
#105841 - alimais ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
People should try /pol/ sometimes, they got some good war threads

>pic related
#105840 - alimais
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#105849 to #105834 - anon
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Economists For Bernie Speak Up
#105847 to #105834 - anon
Reply -3
(02/06/2016) [-]
I hate to be THAT guy. But I think our generation may just be the worst one ever for politics or common sense. I can't wait to see what abominations of politicians we create in 30 years.
-lulz
#105838 to #105834 - Zaxplab
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
#105823 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
1000 feminist protesters VS 1000 BLM protesters. Who would win?
#105839 to #105823 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
The BLM protesters are armed and dangerous, so they could destroy their own city and occupy the feminist city.
#105832 to #105823 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
probably the feminists because the BLM protesters would eventually have to deal with the consequences of burning down their own city
#105828 to #105823 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Everyone
#105833 to #105828 - anon
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
/politics/105702#105702 Still waiting on this one.
#105835 to #105833 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
I already replied to you. If you made an account you'd get the notifications.
#105843 to #105835 - anon
Reply -2
(02/06/2016) [-]
I'm banned on sight for being a naughty boy. :"^ (
#105907 to #105843 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Well you only have yourself to blame for not getting notifications then.
#105820 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
/channel/funny/An+island+of+men+and+an+island+of+women/BatgLOn/

This is the reason why the majority of FJ will never have a qt gf.
#105880 to #105820 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Because they're so incompetent and petty that even if FJ dorks did somehow break out of their socio-sexual caste, there's a good chance that we'd be caught completely off-guard by it?
#105914 to #105880 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Because we live in a world where reality shows hardly reflect society. One could only seriously think so if they live in their mother's basement.
#105983 to #105914 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
It's the rare case where a thought experiment is carried out in a physical, literal sense. Thought experiments don't have to directly reflect a realistic situation in order to shed some light on the subject matter.
#105810 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
How do we effectively eradicate islam? I'm not talking about killing muslims, the stream of new ones is infinite.
How do we wipe the ideology of islam from the face of the Earth?
#105851 to #105810 - akkere
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Probably let it gradually deteriorate by having the more recent generation find its own rebellious movement (like, punk rock or something). Eventually each passing generation will be more and more detached from religion in general that they'll either be in the agnostic gray area, turn to some other belief, or simply not care and live on. That might've even been the direction places like Afghanistan would've gone had the Mujahideen not been given power to send everything spiraling back.
Wouldn't really "wipe it out" per se, but it'd severely reduce it. Given enough time, you'd have arabs shitposting other arabs on the internet about believing in a god in general and fedora tipping, or some equivalent.
#105821 to #105810 - mixednuts
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Well if the homeschool movement is to be believed, all we have to do is force Muslim children to go to public school.
#105818 to #105810 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
It's Impossible. Ideologies don't die. History shows that the only time they die is when they're replaced with new beliefs. For example: christianity and paganism. Even then it took a couple hundred years. And you can't tell people to renounce their gods, it only strengthens their resolve.
#105819 to #105818 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Let a man dream.
#105816 to #105810 - valeriya
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Well here's my personal solution to the issue of Again I have a huge bias against muslims especially sunni, Shia is fine, sufi is best muslim

Number one, if they are not going to integrate on a basic level, and are generally causing problems, they're out, I'm not talking culturally I'm talking on social and legal level.

1.1: Exceptions include areas which are already muslim in that case you can really just decentralize a little bit and 9/10 times it'll be ok, they might dick wave a bit but for the most part you can ignore each other. Easiest example I can think of is Tatarstan and Bashkortostan.

Number two: This applies to Sunni Islam more then Shia Islam, but if ther eis event a hint of wahhabism, or salafism, Crush it without so much as a second thought, or any sort of pan-sunni movement. Yes that includes Sauds and Turkey who everyone seems to be very close friends with

Number 2.1 is going to sound so very typical, but don't put your hands where they're not wanted, exception being above, for the most part things just get fucked up and don't make friends and create conditions with allow the scum to thrive. See Libya for details. again granted hindsight is 20:20

Number three: Remember that this is just a phase in some respects, for the most part you can sit back and watch and look and the funny places like lebanon with a million and one conventions.
#105817 to #105816 - anon
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
mmm you keeping that pussy warm for me baby, i wanna taste your revolutionary rump
#105813 to #105810 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
Reform the religion.
#105808 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
Here's how Flint's water crisis happened

Third world USA?
#105848 to #105808 - anon
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Corruption in the government is not evidence of the USA being a 3rd world. What a weird, provocative title you chose.
#105906 to #105848 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
You don't think living in a place where you don't have safe drinking water due to government corruption is not like the third world then? Whatever.
#105865 to #105848 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Capitalism for cucks.
#105799 - anon
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckservative

Why the fuck is this on Wikipedia and why did they get it so accurately.
#105803 to #105799 - anon
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Right wing people are cucks. Even Wiki is on point.
#105881 to #105803 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Did you even read the page? Cuckservative refers to conservatives who aren't right enough.
#105800 to #105799 - akkere
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
The (rational, non-partisan) consensus that held for two debates in regards to the page is that Wikipedia is a mess of neologisms and so long as pages like "Mansplaining" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mansplaining and "Manspreading" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manspreading exist, then there's no reason to suggest this shouldn't exist either. There was some suggestions to consolidate the neologism with others to a single page, which might've also been an interesting solution for neologisms in general, but it didn't get any traction in the debate talk page.

As for the "accuracy", that used to also be quite wonky. If you scroll through some previous versions, you'll find at one point ""Those in the conservative media targeted by the cuckservative slur along with various moderate and left leaning news sites defined cuckservative as an anti-Christian,[3] racist slur[5][6] and rallying cry for white supremacists and "neoreactionaries".[7] In addition, it's a wildly anti-Semitic[8] pseudo-butch insult[9] fueled by anti-gay[10] sexual debasement,[11] created in part by a renaissance of toxic white masculinity,[12] tribalism,[10][13] and immature obsessions of "men's rights" victimologists[14]"" was an actual statement that was cut under the grounds that it was utterly contradictory to the goal of Wikipedia articles being as NPOV as humanly possible.
#105827 to #105800 - anon
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
One could argue the definition is pretty biased but I never expected more. They basically label people who use the term as Nazis, which can be easily done when a narrative is hidden under "impartial" writings.
#105796 - anon
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
#105797 to #105796 - kanadetenshi
Reply +3
(02/06/2016) [-]
smacks lips profusely
SO HOL UP HOL UP
steals
SO U BE SAYIN
gets jiggy wit it
SO HOL UP U BE SAYIN
eats a skittle
AYYYOOOO SO U BE SAYIN
checks for nearest KFC
U BE SAYIN
collects welfare
HOL UP HOL UP
licks teeth then smacks lips
AYYOO U BE SAYIN
does the crip walk
SO U BE SAYIN
opens up a 40 and pours some for his homies trayvon and michael brown
HOL UP SO U BE SAYIN
tweets about dis and goes to check in with his parole officer
WE WUZ
dindu nuffins
FINNA WE WUZ
sucks air through teeth
AYYYOOO HOL UP WE WUZ
pulls up sagging pants
SO WE WUZ
instinctively looks around for the police
SO U SAYIN WE WUZ
faints and then gets up repeatedly
SOM FINNA
scopes dem titties
SO WE WUZ
shouts at movie theater screen
SOM FINNA
chucks spear
AYYOOO SOM FINNA
sets down cotton bale
HOL UP
strokes welfare check pensively
WE WUZ
throws up gang sign
SOM FINNA
sells crack
KIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINGZ N SHEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
evolves from primate
#105786 - anon
Reply +2
(02/05/2016) [-]
How China Humiliated a US President: Talking Heads
#105773 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(02/05/2016) [-]
A Plea To Hillary Voters . . . Please Don't!

This is a video basically attacking Hillary and comparing her positions to Bernie Sanders over time
#105794 to #105773 - anon
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
TAA is a literal misogynist though.
#105807 to #105794 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
I haven't watched any of the other videos. He didn't seem to be attacking Hillary because of that though.
#105780 to #105773 - anon
Reply -2
(02/05/2016) [-]
Did you...did you just post an amazing atheist video? Jesus christ

Anyways I would much rather have Hillary than Bernie.
#105809 to #105780 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Whatever
#105830 to #105809 - anon
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
I mean look, no one is saying you can't be leftwing on this board. Go ahead, just don't post such ridicolous garbage. We have social norms here, we don't post sources that are so unbelievably stupid, TYT, the amazing atheist, ect.

And further more, I'd be willing to have a conversation with you about why Bernie is absolute garbage, but I would assume based on your history that it wouldn't gain any traction since you wouldn't reply. But I honestly think I can convince even people like you.
-lulz
#105837 to #105830 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(02/06/2016) [-]
Wow.... thanks so much for your permission.

I think some of the stuff others post is stupid. I don't try and get them to stop posting though.

If you want to try and convince me that Hillary is better than Bernie then go ahead but I will keep posting anything I find interesting whether you like it or not.
#105846 to #105837 - anon
Reply -1
(02/06/2016) [-]
The only thing I really want to do is make you a more smart leftist. You seem to be almost new to politics and a lot of the arguments you make are typical, basic things I've seen many times before and its frustrating to have to answer them here.

I don't want to convince you Hillary is better, I want to convince you why it is non-sense and I mean complete non-sense to vote for Bernie because of how much damage he would do. Even on just a simple basic economic level, Bernie does not pass the test. And I'm astonished so many people support him. It really depends on how our current conversation goes if I decide to bother arguing more because I need to understand if you are an honest debater. Which you don't seem to be now, you have a habit of completely ignoring my point and talking about things you clearly do not know about.
#105908 to #105846 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
The reason you say I don't know about things is simply because I disagree with you and that's what you seem to find frustrating.
#105950 to #105908 - anon
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Nope, I disagree with many people on this board. I've said this many times before its like you don't even listen. You are just too plebeian, you're too stupid is what I'm trying to say.
#105956 to #105950 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Whatever. I disagree with you and you can't justify what you say so you say I'm stupid. Go fuck yourself.
#105988 to #105956 - anon
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
No this is where you are wrong again, I can easily justified it. I did, the argument we had you haven't replied to yet and have made no effort to. You are the one ignoring my points, you seem to have this backwards.

I wouldn't call you stupid or plebeian if I couldn't respond to what you wrote.
#105997 to #105988 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
You haven't made any points here for me to respond you. Were you banned for trolling maybe?
#106012 to #105997 - anon
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
You haven't responded to my Trump posts from before. Stop pretending like you don't know what I'm talking about.
#106035 to #106012 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/08/2016) [-]
WTF are you talking about?

Again: The reason you say I don't know about things is simply because I disagree with you and that's what you seem to find frustrating.
#106055 to #106035 - anon
Reply 0
(02/09/2016) [-]
/politics/105844#105844 How short-minded are you...?
#105804 to #105780 - redandgreen
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#105775 to #105773 - pebar
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
#105805 to #105775 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Sincerity is a much underused virtue in our society.
#105776 to #105775 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
A sincere idiot, is still an idiot.
#105774 to #105773 - marinepenguin
Reply -1
(02/05/2016) [-]
Meh. Nothing anyone with a brain doesn't already know. I don't think anyone's saying that Bernie Sanders isn't passionate or a fraud, I think he believes his own message. But that doesn't change that his policies are absurd.

He diagnoses a lot of the correct issues, but his method of correcting it is just asinine and will make things worse.
#105806 to #105774 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
Such as what? He was absolutely right about Iraq which almost all the Republicans were in favour of. He's also right about the issue of money in politics.
#105812 to #105806 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/06/2016) [-]
In hindsight he absolutely was correct about the Iraq war, in that he wasn't in favor of it. My main issue with Iraq is that we just didn't finish the job, not that we went in there in the first place. And honestly whether or not a politician supported the Iraq war or not isn't a good reason to support or oppose them in my opinion.

And I don't have an issue with what Bernie Sanders says our problems are, I actually think he has a pretty good idea of what's wrong with the nation, it's just his solutions that bother me. Single payer government healthcare, higher minimum wage, government education, higher taxes, etc. He wants us to pursue European Socialism, which I'm against.
#105770 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
/Sweden+is+done/funny-pictures/5822743/

SWEDEN YES!
enlightenednatzie
#105781 to #105770 - anon
Reply +1
(02/05/2016) [-]
America fucked Sweden up, never trust Americans the zionist sheep.
#105761 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
I can have political conversations on Facebook anymore because everything thinks Fascism is an extreme form of Capitalism. And use the fact that the USSR and Hitler hated each other as proof.

Then they go and say that inflation and printing money is good and that'll pay for Bernie Sanders policies, and then I'm called an idiot for saying that FDR extended the depression with many of his policies and that the minimum wage being raised to $15 is a bad idea.

Granted, that's what I get for following Bernie on social media and interacting with his rabid followers circle jerking all over each other. How dare I interrupt their good time.

#105787 to #105761 - anon
Reply +1
(02/05/2016) [-]
Fascism doesn't work in reality.

It's degenerate as fuck.
#105788 to #105787 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(02/05/2016) [-]
No forms of Socialism are sustainable. Every Socialist nation is either a war-torn dystopia or is crippled with debt or has a birth rate of under 1.5 and pays 80% in taxes.
#105901 to #105788 - commiekirby
Reply 0
(02/07/2016) [-]
Hey now, Vietnam exists.
#105790 to #105788 - anon
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
>>#105786,
#105791 to #105790 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
I still can't see stuff from anons and its getting annoying.
#105789 to #105788 - anon
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
China willl have a bigger GDP then Cucktopia (america) in a few years.
#105777 to #105761 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
Fascism is a form of State Socialism that advocates for class collaboration as opposed to Marxist and anarchist forms of socialism that advocate abolishing classes altogether.

Hayek recognized that socialism would ultimately transition to fascism rather than communism (in the utopian meaning of the word) because socialism requires centralized decision making, which was more realistic under a hierarchal system like fascism than under a chaotic classless system like communism or anarchism.
#105778 to #105777 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
Yes I've read Hayek and understand that. I just don't understand how these people can think extreme capitalism = fascism. Is there even such a thing as "extreme capitalism"? That just seems like a very free unregulated market to me.
#105779 to #105778 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
Yeah extreme capitalism would essentially be anarcho-capitalism.
#105765 to #105761 - anon
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
No, but Fascism is right-wing. I could be wrong, but I almost feel like you trying to push the "NATIONAL SOCIALISMZ IS SOCIALISM CUZ NAME" meme, and misconstruing what they were saying in response to that.

The "Roosevelt rescission" is also a meme that's been debunked constantly. There was small recovery after Roosevelt implemented the first New Deal policies. Which he saw as a sign that he could begin to reverse some of them (against the advice of several economists), which turned out to be a mistake.

>Following the social media account of a candidate and expecting anything less than an echo chamber.

That's a bad idea, what were you expecting? Don't try and tell me that someone like Ben Carson or Ted Cruz's Facebook pages are spaces of for evenhanded nuanced debate.
#105767 to #105765 - pebar
Reply +2
(02/05/2016) [-]
economically, fascism and democratic socialism are indistinguishable
social issues are the only thing they disagree on
#105766 to #105765 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
Almost all the anons are hidden for me and it won't let me unhide them. I could only see your first paragraph. And calling the Nazis right-wing isn't incorrect, but it was a authoritarian extreme of Socialism.
#105762 to #105761 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/05/2016) [-]
I can't have*