x
Click to expand
Latest users (3): minibeep, Nutshell, schnizel, anonymous(23).
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#64754 - alimais (06/19/2014) [-]
How does this make you feel ?

@1:54 the most fun starts

YUROPOOR PRESENTS: AMERICANS CLAPPING V - THE RETURN OF THE CLAPBURGERS
User avatar #64756 to #64754 - schnizel ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
10/10
User avatar #64734 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
Man the average funnyjunker is retarded. They've watched so much porn that they honestly can't see why people have a problem with prostitutes around their children.

www.funnyjunk.com/Seem+that+the+parents+are+very/funny-pictures/5187370/9#9
User avatar #64767 to #64734 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
First of all she hasn't been in porn for years. And second if she's doing nothing remotely sexual why should you give a shit?
User avatar #64771 to #64767 - youregaylol (06/19/2014) [-]
Why don't you people read? I must have addressed the whole "omg the whore isn't whoring in front of the kids" crap a trillion times in the thread, I'm not gonna repeat it for you.
#64742 to #64734 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
You're just as bad as the muslims who want sharia for everyone.
User avatar #64743 to #64742 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
So not wanting prostitutes around children equates to being for sharia law?

If that's your position you're only encouraging people to embrace islamic law instead of rejecting it. Plus you're not doing libertarians any favors by encouraging whores in schools.

You goof'd.
User avatar #64744 to #64743 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
Whats morally wrong about sex?
User avatar #64755 to #64744 - schnizel ONLINE (06/19/2014) [-]
You have to keep the young ones from degeneracy and anime.
User avatar #64745 to #64744 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
We're not talking about sex, we're talking about whores around children.

If you want to jack off to porn, fine, but keep it away from the kids.
User avatar #64746 to #64745 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
Nobody is jacking off near kids. Nobody is having sex near kids.
A person is reading a book to kids and you have a problem with it for some reason.

She's not full of infectious diseases. She's not telling kids to be promiscuous. So what's the problem?
User avatar #64747 to #64746 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
Ridiculous argument. Would you have a problem with Jeffery Dahmer being invited to read books to your children? I mean he's just a person. He's not killing anybody near the kids. If all he did was read the three little pigs, daddy pebar would be okay with it.

No sensible parent would be okay with a prostitute around their kids, thats just how it is.
User avatar #64748 to #64747 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
Which brings us back to my other question: what's morally wrong about having sex?
How does sex make someone a bad person?
User avatar #64749 to #64748 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
Once again, we're not talking about sex. We're talking about whores around children. Children do not need to be exposed to whores. They're kids. You're twisting the issue into a statement about sexual liberation when really it's an issue about child welfare.

Likewise children should not be exposed to alcohol, even though as adults they might find it as stress reliever.
User avatar #64751 to #64749 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
Would you have a problem with a bartender reading to kids?
User avatar #64753 to #64751 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
I would, especially if he was famous for being a notorious booze peddler. That shouldn't be around kids. Why not just invite a fucking clown or something? Why would people even think of inviting known prostitutes to read to children, think about that.
User avatar #64750 to #64749 - pebar (06/18/2014) [-]
Fine, what's wrong with having multiple sex partners and filming it?
You object to porn? You sound like one of those sharia muslims to me.
#64759 to #64750 - byposted (06/19/2014) [-]
It's the peripheral culture. There is a strong correlation between a high number of sexual partners and an inability to remain loyally monogamous. Prostitution and filmed, legal, prostitution are embodiments of the lifestyle that parents naturally attempt to shield their children from.

You seem to focus your lens too strongly on the economical, rather than the parental, angle -- which seems natural enough for a libertarian. There may indeed be nothing "wrong" with a woman being drugged and abused by her pimp, or porn boss, so long as a healthy profit is produced, but what of the fact that the path of one's life very often is determined early-on?

That Sasha Grey claims to be bringing "art" into a "profession" littered with doped up unfortunates, who really didn't have any other choice in life, should be offensive. You did a good job of trapping youregaylol into a box, but I must turn the tables. How can allowing such a pretentious cunt into a schoolhouse be justified?

Schools attempt to expose children to positive characters and influences. This does not mean outlawing sexual education or teaching that the act makes one wicked. We are speaking of a porn-star after all; healthy sexual relationships are hardly depicted in pornography. The fact that many believe so is theorized to be an impediment to the building of healthy marriages, and, by confluence, a healthy society.
0
#64758 to #64750 - byposted has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64752 to #64750 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
I can't really object to porn in the united states. Well I guess I can but theres really no point. Everybody has already been raised in an overly sexual environment that there would no point in opposing it. But we're getting off track, I'm opposed to prostitutes around children. Anything else is irrelevant.

And these comparisons your drawing are flimsy. Hitler was an animal lover, if you have a pet does that make you a national socialist?
User avatar #64738 to #64734 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
That's FJ.
User avatar #64732 - jewishcommunazi (06/18/2014) [-]
What do you think of the death penalty?
User avatar #64760 to #64732 - fuckya (06/19/2014) [-]
Not effective/quick enough in the US.
User avatar #64739 to #64732 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Are you drop dead Syrius?
User avatar #64741 to #64739 - jewishcommunazi (06/18/2014) [-]
No, I'm alive and I'm portuguese.
User avatar #64735 to #64732 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
An effective means of deterring undesirables
#64733 to #64732 - anonymous (06/18/2014) [-]
There are scum of society who deserve to die but I don't want the government to have the power to administer death, so I stand against it.
#64727 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
I'll give you an answer that pretty much covers it all about the non-white immigration.

Naturally, people are loyal to those around them. In civilized societies, leaders tend to stay around a special class of people who guide them and advise them and help them carry out their political will. In the western world, these are (1) the journalists, (2) the bureaucrats, (3) the academia, (4) their own families and friends and (5) representatives of their foreign business partners or allies. In 1968, a rather sudden 'student revolution' toppled the existing order in academia and replaced it with a new order, one which subscribed to normative multiculturalism and critical theory, and which popularised the self-loathing we see all around us. In the decades that followed, these people spread their ideas to the journalists, the bureaucrats, the academia, the families and friends of politicians, and eventually to politicians themselves. Meanwhile, ordinary people - who have always been slow to embrace revolutionary ideas - became more and more disgruntled because their politicians suddenly switched to this self-loathing mode and started ruining their lives.

Still, politicians spend more time with people who agree with them than they do with ordinary people who don't. I'll give you an example: the European Commission, which is housed in the Berlaymont Building in Brussels. Even though people in Belgium are tired of normative multiculturalism, the people in the Berlaymont Building - who ultimately decide what happens - are staunchly set in their ways. They believe multiculturalism will work, they believe Islam isn't a threat and they believe we need more immigrants. If, within that bureaucracy or the social networks surrounding it, you speak out against them, they will ostracize you. It's a natural human mechanism for people who control others to want to keep the status quo.
User avatar #64736 to #64727 - youregaylol (06/18/2014) [-]
I kinda wanna post that pic as content just to see what happens.
User avatar #64737 to #64736 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Do it.
User avatar #64778 to #64740 - alimais (06/20/2014) [-]
Well, schnizel

I did too, maybe my choice of title is better

www.funnyjunk.com/channel/political/Multiculturalism+in+a+nutshell/sBYLLfO
User avatar #64728 to #64727 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
This is not about legal immigration. It's about Africans who try to get into Europe. Once they're in, it's very difficult to deport them and governments will typically choose to either give them a residence permit or to at least tolerate their presence in the nation's cities and towns. If you want to know how it works, it works like this. In African towns, there are people who will talk about their own success story or about the story of a few relatives of theirs who managed to get into Europe. They'll tell their extended family and their friends that Europe is where all Africans can live an easy life. Then, some others will decide to give it a go. They gather a significant amount of money and they leave their towns. They first move to North Africa. There, they are brought into contact with human traffickers, usually Muslims from Libya or the Middle East, who will give them a place on a boat. These boats are typically shabby - old fishing boats at best, rafts at worst. The boats are sent across the Meditteranean, but often they don't make it to Italy. They either break down or get intercepted by some poor European ship.

Here's the fun part. Once that ship spots them, it is required by law (and under close supervision of the European Union's external border agency Frontex) to 'rescue' all those on board and take them to the nearest European port, which is usually either Lampedusa or Malta if the boats come from Libya. Once these Africans step on board that European vessel, they know they're in the clear. That is the moment they receive all of their 'human rights' as guaranteed by the European Union, the Council of Europe and a few dozen international treaties, and they can't really be deported anymore unless they go about raping and murdering people.
User avatar #64729 to #64728 - schnizel ONLINE (06/18/2014) [-]
Another method they use is a bit simpler, but only available to those with a bit of a reputation (community leaders). They pretend to be tourists or foreign students, and they simply take a plane to Europe. Once they're in Europe, they get rid of their identity papers and claim to be refugees from some war-torn country. In that case - which is why this method works so well - the national government of the country they want to claim asylum in has to prove that they are lying or that they are war criminals. And lack of evidence that they are who they say they are isn't enough, so nine out of ten times that national government has to allow them to stay.

They say Africans are stupid, but they know how to work the system almost as well as professional lawyers.
#64725 - commission (06/18/2014) [-]
The Internationale ( In Russian )

I hope only victory for the Donetsk People's Republic
User avatar #64726 to #64725 - alimais (06/18/2014) [-]
I agree

Islamic State of Donbass and Lugant / قم ودع عنك الرقاد
#64703 - anonymous (06/17/2014) [-]
I have a malnourished crop and I need poop now!

CALL FAT BEN MADE POOP! 877-POOP-NOW!
User avatar #64687 - alimais (06/17/2014) [-]
US/Israel relationship

MONEY PIG!
User avatar #64957 to #64687 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
alekksandar this board is cool
#64970 to #64957 - alekksandar (06/28/2014) [-]
I hate funnyjunk boards.
User avatar #64971 to #64970 - alimais (06/28/2014) [-]
I did too at first
#64972 to #64971 - alekksandar (06/28/2014) [-]
Well, I'm not you.
User avatar #64714 to #64687 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Americans like to think that Israel is the pig.

Everyone else knows it's the other way around.
User avatar #64705 to #64687 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
When do we give them money?
User avatar #64708 to #64707 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Point taken.

But you might want to look at the amount of aid given to other nations.
User avatar #64709 to #64708 - alimais (06/17/2014) [-]
Well, they wouldn't had to give Iraq/Afghanistan any aid if they hadn't fucked it over in the first place.
User avatar #64710 to #64709 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Not really the only reason the US is doing nation building is because its planning for a long term occupation and to use the resources of those nations.
User avatar #64712 to #64710 - alimais (06/17/2014) [-]
"planning" aren't they already doing it ?
User avatar #64713 to #64712 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Not yet.
User avatar #64722 to #64701 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Isn't that that TLC show about people eating like retards? Sauce? Any episodes like that one about 'Muricans?
#64723 to #64722 - anonymous (06/17/2014) [-]
Freaky Eaters.

They're all a lot like that.
Usually somebody will only eat one thing.
#64686 - pebar (06/17/2014) [-]
www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2014/06/16/supreme-court-allows-challenge-law-banning-lies-elections/0ADC0E28dXt5EgKxbmF4VI/story.html

"The Supreme Court on Monday allowed a challenge to an Ohio law banning lies in political campaigns to move forward, ruling that two advocacy groups could challenge a law that makes it a crime to make knowingly or recklessly false statements about candidates that are intended to help elect or defeat them."

"Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser said the group would move quickly to try to have the law tossed out, saying the truth of political statements should be judged by voters.
Both liberal and conservative groups have criticized the Ohio law, saying it stifles the wide debate that is crucial during elections, including negative speech that may sometimes twist the facts."

aaaahh election season

User avatar #64715 to #64686 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
This is pretty infuriating, but it's not like it matters in an oiligarchy.
User avatar #64683 - feelythefeel (06/17/2014) [-]
Why does this board make neo-Nazism seem like delusions of personal grandeur the ideology?
User avatar #64706 to #64683 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Because it is.
#64704 to #64683 - anonymous (06/17/2014) [-]
Cause puberty.
User avatar #64685 to #64683 - schnizel ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
The name explains it.
User avatar #64675 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
So what are nationalist socialists view point on the minimum wage?
User avatar #64761 to #64675 - fuckya (06/19/2014) [-]
Minimum wage should at the minimum be enough to cover the cost of living.
User avatar #64773 to #64761 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
But its being determined by political forces in the ever changing market place.
User avatar #64774 to #64773 - fuckya (06/20/2014) [-]
I place cost of living as being able to afford transportation, food, shelter, and clothing. It fluctuates.
User avatar #64775 to #64774 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/20/2014) [-]
You know that some people need to work experience to be hired?
User avatar #64776 to #64775 - fuckya (06/20/2014) [-]
And then the age old paradox of "How can I get work experience if no one will hire me because I don't have work experience."
If you hold a job, you should be able to survive. You'd need work experience, education and good luck to thrive.
User avatar #64684 to #64675 - schnizel ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
I tend to leave that to the pros but I'm in favor of the wage that is going to improve peoples lives, no matter the cost.
User avatar #64691 to #64684 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
even if said wage isn't actually improving their lives.
User avatar #64692 to #64691 - schnizel ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
How so?
User avatar #64695 to #64692 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Wages are in effect unimportant to actual living conditions.
User avatar #64697 to #64695 - schnizel ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
That's not how reality said.
User avatar #64698 to #64697 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Okay there are two states that are the same expect for the pay of the job you get.
One job will pay you a dollar.
The other will pay you ten dollars.

However, the stand of living is 25 cents in the first state.
And in the state over the stand of living is 5 dollars.
Which is better?
User avatar #64699 to #64698 - schnizel ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
1 dorra
User avatar #64700 to #64699 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
exactly
User avatar #64678 to #64675 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
Hitler was in favor of a living wage as he believed that was an important step in achieving a pure socialism.

In the book Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant , by Otto Wagener, edited by Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Hitler told Wagener, “But if we realize our social economy exactly as we discussed more than once, we will come to liberate the individual from the domination of capital and all its institutions. To begin with, labor will seize possession of capital. But what is ethically mostsignificant is the following: when the
purchasing power of wages increases - when, as you say, it might even double - the initial effect will be that production will have to increase, since the demand will be greater. But next comes the great era of increasing personal gratification, with the result that the worker will still earn a sufficiency if, instead of working eight hours a day , he puts in only seven or even six.This moment signifies the rebirth of individuality, of the possibility of living for oneself outside the hours that serve material needs, and of devoting oneself to hobbies, cultural interests,art, science, life in general, and the family."

“To this extent, then, socialism - our socialism - leads back to individuality, and with it to the strongest impetus to a personal, racially defined, and altogether universal human evolution.”
User avatar #64679 to #64678 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Even thought it only raises the prices of goods? Causes workers to be fired?
User avatar #64680 to #64679 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
A living wage provides what is necessary for the worker to survive without exploitation. Cooperation between the classes, something that only fascism has truly achieved, eliminates usual market trends common among corporate oligarchies. The state comes before the individual, and before the business. By mobilizing labor, seizing capital, and enlisting industrialists you create a system in which exponential growth is possible and required. More pay=more goods=more jobs.
User avatar #64682 to #64680 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Since when did you become a marxist?

The problem is you only shift the burden of labor on the person taking all the risk, he has to pay more for the same cost of labor making goods more expensive for all groups meaning the purchasing power of the state decreases for those without a steady pay check.
And no you did not create cooperation you created a system of leaches. Market trends are the tools in which society receives what it needs and desires better than any government could hope to do.
Any land where the state is all reaching and whose people's rights are mere privileges till the state sees them too as problems, causing the people to search elsewhere for a society that respects them.
All of that works for war time but demand must meet supply and inflating supply and lowering demand are the conditions for economic collapse.
#64731 to #64682 - jewishcommunazi (06/18/2014) [-]
>Proudly promoting class cooperation;
>Marxist.
Not that saying marxism is when social democrats get a hold of socialism is anywhere less inaccurate.
0
#64730 to #64682 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64689 to #64682 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
National socialism =/= Marxism. Marxism is what happens when social democrats get a hold of socialism.

Also you're assuming that a fascist government would obey the trends of a supposed liberal capitalism. For instance, the capitalist concept of risk and reward did not exist for a private business man. Private business was intertwined with the interests of the state and the people. Any losses would be social losses, any profit would be private losses. Business men would be able to follow their chosen path if it meant that the people benefited from it. In addition, businesses were directed by the state to increase infrastructure, creating jobs while maintaining high wages with continued building projects. The regime more than doubled construction jobs when it came to power.
User avatar #64693 to #64689 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Not when the business man see better opportunities where not all of his wealth is stolen by the state, and not where his factory that was used to make cars is now a tank factory.

Again its lose lose from his perspective so why not take what he can and leave? Leaving only those who can't run a business but fell into it.

Also do you really believe any nation can spend like that and survive? We tried that the great depression and it didn't work.
User avatar #64694 to #64693 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
The Third Reich succeeded in providing vehicles to every german citizen with the Volkswagen, not to mention thousands of other technological advancements that increased the standard of living. And once again, you're confusing national socialism with marxism. The state did not "steal" from the business man, it provided an environment where he could succeed while aiding the german citizen. He wouldn't leave because he was thriving. Why would it matter if his factory was now making tanks? His people needed it and he would still profit from it. It's a win win situation.

The german miracle clearly demonstrates the superiority of an economic system that puts the nation first.
User avatar #64696 to #64694 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Only for four years. FOUR FUCKING YEARS.
Such as? What technology that improved the standard of living?

Maybe because he is not the master of his work? That he is merely the keeper of his factory? not the owner?

You seem to think business men are like workers content to work and be paid off but they aren't.
0
#64688 to #64682 - youregaylol has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64672 - teoberry (06/17/2014) [-]
My beef with the transgender community... Gud watch
User avatar #64666 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/16/2014) [-]
Hey pebar and byposted.
User avatar #64669 to #64666 - byposted (06/17/2014) [-]
hello
User avatar #64670 to #64669 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Sup?
#64673 to #64670 - byposted (06/17/2014) [-]
Fighting the good fight
#64674 to #64673 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
Same.
Same.
User avatar #64668 to #64666 - pebar (06/17/2014) [-]
hey
#64671 to #64668 - undeadwill ONLINE (06/17/2014) [-]
You seen my two clones?
You seen my two clones?
User avatar #64681 to #64665 - youregaylol (06/17/2014) [-]
Of course there will be no punishment. Corporate police trained like soldiers interacting with the people and accountable to no one.

Purge them and install a volunteer militia loyal to their communities and brainwashed by no one.
User avatar #64657 - ribocoon (06/16/2014) [-]
**ribocoon rolled user takeaseat ** Write a letter to Mr. Mitt Romney asking for him to trickle some of his golden piss down on you
#64653 - alimais (06/16/2014) [-]
ARe you ready Achmed ?
User avatar #64664 to #64653 - schnizel ONLINE (06/16/2014) [-]
Damn.
User avatar #64659 to #64653 - gigamuffin (06/16/2014) [-]
Aye Aye, Haram!
User avatar #64662 to #64659 - alimais (06/16/2014) [-]
I like to call em Haramists
#64647 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
What do you guys think is the most stable form of goverment who doesnt push any social agenda like Nationalism or Cultural Marxism?
User avatar #64663 to #64647 - youregaylol (06/16/2014) [-]
There is no stability in a nation that lets social standards fall to the way side.
User avatar #64660 to #64647 - byposted (06/16/2014) [-]
What's the fault with social agendas? I notice the growth of economic-stressed ideologies and can only conclude that it comes as a result of society's decay.
#64650 to #64647 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
One with a well-define constitution and a court system that defends it.
One with a well-define constitution and a court system that defends it.
#64643 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
Can anyone tell me some of the more objectionable things about Monsanto?

Please try to keep out, the anti-gmo, fear mongering, pseudoscience.
User avatar #64654 to #64643 - akkere (06/16/2014) [-]
In terms of business practice, they've got some pretty dirty hands. They're major proponents to false advertising, primarily from claiming their glyphosbate-based herbicide Roundup was biodegradable and safe, when it actually isn't (glyphosbate is notoriously toxic to run-off, especially in the ocean). They're also a bit trust-y, even so much as being criticized for having control of the soybean market in China, and rapidly expanding to cotton and corn with their respective BT cotton and corn strains. Of course, that all depends on what your opinion is on trusts.

I suppose the consequence to the anti-GMO craze is that it applies a "Boy who cried Wolf" affect on legitimate problems that Monsanto causes.
User avatar #64644 to #64643 - economicfreedom (06/16/2014) [-]
They're pretty bitchy about patent violations.
For example, if a farmer buys their genetically altered seeds, plants the crops, harvests seeds from that crop, then plants those seeds again (what every farmer does), they could get sued because they just created a genetically altered seed without permission.
#64639 - songemot (06/16/2014) [-]
So, /politics/. Which pill have you taken?
User avatar #64762 to #64639 - fuckya (06/19/2014) [-]
Closest to brown. I mean, at times I am offended, but I never argue from a point of feelings or use "i'm offended".
#64702 to #64639 - anonymous (06/17/2014) [-]
I TOOK THE FAT BEN'S POOP PILL
User avatar #64649 to #64639 - jadewest (06/16/2014) [-]
Indigo
#64642 to #64639 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
Blue pill, if any.
#64646 to #64642 - songemot (06/16/2014) [-]
You poor, poor soul...
#64648 to #64646 - anonymous (06/16/2014) [-]
At last, I truly see.
#64638 - tredbear (06/16/2014) [-]
Pro-Russian militants shoot down Ukraine transport plane

I believe that Putin won't take any more shit from Ukraine and started to send troops into Ukraine under the title of "rebels'

either way, shit will hit the fan.

I hope Putin saves those in the East

and I hope people don't forget about the Odessa Massacre.
User avatar #64641 to #64638 - alimais (06/16/2014) [-]
If I weren't on my phone then I could post the info I have gathered
 Friends (0)