Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (3): akkere, borderlineparanoid, pebar, anonymous(3).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#107799 - canyou
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#107792 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
The audience of the Ben Shapiro speech is literally being held hostage by leftists
they have all the exits blocked
#107797 to #107792 - anon
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
#107794 to #107792 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
Is this live?
#107788 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
#107816 to #107788 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
So what ended up happening? Shitty WiFi messed with my live feed
#107791 to #107788 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
The fuck? She wasn't even doing anything, just recording.
#107754 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
livestream.com/YAF/events/4870270
Ben Shapiro at CSULA

canyou
#107851 to #107754 - Zaxplab
Reply +1
(02/26/2016) [-]
Good god his voice is annoying.
#107790 to #107754 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Oh my god
#107786 to #107754 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Shit is about to erupt.
#107766 to #107755 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Stream keeps crashing on me
#107756 to #107755 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
protesters are violent
#107761 to #107756 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
He's getting in to it now
#107760 to #107756 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Is that the fire alarm?
#107763 to #107760 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
yes
#107759 to #107756 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
He seems to be talking about what is happening there. What was he invited to talk about before this controversy?
#107762 to #107759 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
"when diversity becomes a problem" i believe is the title of his speech
#107764 to #107762 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Sorry, I didn't see that but he started now.
#107752 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Do democrats even HAVE a choice in their primaries with the Superdelegates thing?
#107751 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
It's fascinating that people feel the head of a major real estate company will be inherently less corrupt than any other politician.
#107800 to #107751 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
What's fascinating is that you believe the head of a real estate company will have as much power as any given senator, governor, or representative.

Muh ebil corporations
#107801 to #107800 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
What implies that?
#107806 to #107801 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
You always seem to compare the two, as if they're somehow related. Neither positions are inherently corrupt, but any position of power will attract bad human beings. The more powerful the position, the greater likelihood of corruption.

The power of your average CEO or board of directors, is far far less than that of a corrupt group of politicians. Uber billionaires I would maybe agree with.
#107812 to #107806 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
Trump is a billionaire who wants to be President.... Does that make him appallingly corrupt in your eyes?
#107821 to #107812 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
Not necessarily. I'm not saying its a scale that you can just tack down as fact, it's just probability. Do I think a billionaire politician would be corrupt? Likely. Do I think Trump himself is corrupt? To a degree.
#107878 to #107821 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
I understand what you mean, I think I misread what you were saying before. I agree with you.
#107807 to #107806 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
So then putting anyone into the presidency is likely to lead to corruption?
#107809 to #107807 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
I believe so. Which is why power should be distributed in my opinion, not concentrated. A bunch of weak politicians are going to be less corrupt and do less overall damage compared to a few strong corrupt politicians.
#107810 to #107809 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
So then it's ridiculous to argue that trump would be significantly less corrupt than most other candidates?
#107819 to #107810 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
Not necessarily. The positions aren't inherently corrupt, they're just more likely to be.

Do I think Trump is corrupt? To a degree, yes. Do I think he has some of his own reasons for becoming president? Absolutely.
#107813 to #107810 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
On the scale suggested he'd be MORE corrupt if elected - a billionaire & President.
#107820 to #107813 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
It'd be more probable, it's not like every political individual or billionaire is unethical or corrupt. It's just that power and money attract unethical and corrupt individuals. But saying that Trump is inherently corrupt because he's a billionaire and a political figure wouldn't be accurate.
#107877 to #107820 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
Yes, I agree. I do think that Trump is corrupt though.
#107787 to #107751 - anon
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Why are you assuming successful business people are as corrupt as government officials?
#107789 to #107787 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Because they are. It's the same subset of people.
#107730 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
What do we do against the surge in avocado-farm related crimes?
#107750 to #107730 - thereasonableperso
Reply +5
(02/25/2016) [-]
Ban assault-avocados and create avocado-free zones.
#107749 to #107730 - drastronomy
Reply +3
(02/25/2016) [-]
This must be Jeb!'s fault.
#107748 to #107730 - anon
Reply +3
(02/25/2016) [-]
Ban Avacados, IT'S THE ONLY WAY
#107723 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
>leftists think pro gun people want to force them to own guns

/channel/libertarians/Shall+not+be+infringed/vGThLiT/135#135
#107757 to #107723 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
There are places in the US with mandatory gun ownership. So they're right to think that some pro gun people want that.
#107770 to #107757 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
None of them are enforced and they're in the slimmest minority. It's just a way for anti gun pussies to justify being pussies.
#107771 to #107770 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
"It's just a way for anti gun pussies to justify being pussies"

WTF? Are you insane?
#107772 to #107771 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
11/10 great rebuttal
#107773 to #107772 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
You seem to be suggesting these laws exist to give anti gun campaigners the chance to claim that pro gun campaigners want mandatory gun ownership.

Are you aware of how insane that sounds?
#107774 to #107773 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
They don't exist because of that, but thats really the only purpose they serve.

Anything else?
#107775 to #107774 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
The fact is they DO exist - there clearly are pro gun activists who do want mandatory gun ownership.
#107776 to #107775 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
There are also leftists that openly want to eradicate the white race, it wouldn't be logical to assume they're numerous enough to be a problem. Well, it would actually since they are quite numerous, but you get the example. Or maybe you don't, I don't really give a shit one way or the other.

#107777 to #107776 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I love how you respond when you're presented with facts which contradict your position.
#107779 to #107777 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
"Leftists who want to cut off all mens dicks DO exist, therefor it's okay to be afraid of all leftists cutting off your dick."

Could you please kill yourself, for me. Thank you.
#107781 to #107779 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Nice strawman.

Minor difference - there are actually places with laws requiring mandatory gun ownership.

Please though, continue your shit show.
#107783 to #107781 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
A small, small percentage with unenforced laws that have no bearing on peoples lives.

You can cry about it all you'd like, the fact is anti gun pussies are just looking for ways to frighten themselves more.

Place the noose around your neck, just do it.
#107795 to #107783 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
The fact is that some places have laws in place requiring gun ownership.
#107798 to #107795 - marinepenguin
Reply +1
(02/26/2016) [-]
There are more places where guns are not allowed than where guns are "mandatory". The areas that have these mandatory gun laws are very rural and in places like Colorado, Georgia, and Utah.

But while I disagree with both, the notion of being told "you must have a gun in your home for self defense" seems much less alarming then the people who say "you shouldn't own a weapon at all". And far more people advocate for that, then the former .
#107803 to #107798 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
I agree with you. The point I was making was that it was wrong to claim that no pro gun activists want ownership to be mandatory and that there's undeniable evidence that some do.
#107753 to #107723 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
"AR-15's are overkill"

wat?
#107739 to #107723 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/25/2016) [-]
"Anyone who wants to take my rights away is a douchebag."
---you

oh god
oh god the irony
#107741 to #107739 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
What rights of yours do I want to take away.
#107743 to #107741 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/25/2016) [-]
you oppose free speech in the name of stability of the state
you oppose freedom of contract (trade)
#107744 to #107743 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
oh yea lol
#107765 to #107744 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(02/25/2016) [-]
/channel/libertarians/Shall+not+be+infringed/vGThLiT/248#248

Here's you strawmanning someone and claiming that they would restrict free speech because they're a 'leftist'. More irony....!

It's good you acknowledge you're full of shit.
#107768 to #107765 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
lol I remember when you first came here with your mickey mouse bullshit, how quickly that went out the door though once i made you cry a few times.
#107778 to #107768 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(02/25/2016) [-]
You probably made your parents cry when they realised you're retarded but that's about it.
#107780 to #107778 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'd take that to heart if it wasn't coming from an mongoloid with an obsession for a third rate childrens cartoon made by Tim Burton.

Please, place the pistol into your mouth, squeeze it gently.
#107782 to #107780 - redandgreen
Reply -1
(02/25/2016) [-]
Keep trying, your Ma is still crying.
#107784 to #107782 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Are you excited that I finally gave you the attention you crave from me. I know you love me, it's okay

But I think I need some space, you're getting a bit clingy.
#107796 to #107784 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
You're completely divorced from reality and can't seem to see that the things you're accusing 'leftists' of you're actually guilty of.

Don't flatter yourself, it's pathetic.
#107717 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
God the Guacocast was depressing. Poor Jeb. We're all going to be sad when you finally kill yourself :/
#107747 to #107717 - asotil
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
My bet is on Wednesday
#107708 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Will the fact that Microsoft endorses opening that iPhone, and Apple refusing to do so, have any influence on your choice between the two in the future?

I mean, if you buy products containing Microsoft, or even use them, you're financing the abolishment of the constitution.

So I expect you all to change to Mac, as it is clearly the superior choice for any moral individual.
#107793 to #107708 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
>and Trump doesn't like Apple
BTFO
#107869 to #107793 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
How? I never said that at all.
#107922 to #107869 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
You said you should clearly choose Mac, I just told you Trump doesn't like Apple (unless he flip flopped on that recently)
#107758 to #107708 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
A Trump supporter defending the Constitution is laughable. Do you even know what he supports? Watch the video that lotengo posted below, though no doubt you'll try and find a way to deny that too.
#107767 to #107758 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
>Not getting the irony of my post
#107769 to #107767 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm sorry, as you're a Trump supporter it's reasonable to assume irony is beyond you.
#107868 to #107769 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
You sure are the most arrogant user on this board.
#107879 to #107868 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(02/26/2016) [-]
You're entitled to your opinion. I think Trump supporters are generally either stupid or ill-informed.

The reason I say that is because Trump supporters, from what I have seen, are generally in favour of the US Constiution and Bill of Rights and Trump would wipe his arse with them.
#107715 to #107708 - lotengo
Reply +2
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm with Trump on this one
Donald Trump Calls For Apple Boycott
#107706 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
Ben Shapiro might get arrested today
#107716 to #107706 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm pretty sure the college caved. He uploaded two short vids of him speaking to his youtube channel.
#107737 to #107716 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm very certain those are separate things since his scheduled speech hasn't happened yet
#107738 to #107737 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Oh good! Hopefully a gigantic shit show goes down.
#107740 to #107738 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
his twitter feed is pretty lively
#107742 to #107740 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Guess it's time to dust off my old twitter account
#107707 to #107706 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
For what?
#107709 to #107707 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
He's been planning on speaking at a Cali university for weeks
protests happened
he confirmed that his speech would still happen TWICE
The dean stepped in and "postponed" his speech so that they could also have a leftist on a panel to debate him in order to promote a diversity of ideas
They don't don't require to also have a conservative whenever a leftist speaks so this is a blatant violation of free speech

Ben Shapiro has promised to go to the university anyway
if the door to the room is locked, he said he give his speech in the hallway
decent chance he'll be arrested for trespassing

he's live streaming it
starts at 2pm pacific time
#107718 to #107709 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
A given platform not giving time to a speaker is not a violation of free speech. Shapiro is only being blocked from this venue at this time. However the students protesting are being idiotic.
#107724 to #107718 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
it is if it's a government institution and different rules exist solely based on the content of the speech
#107725 to #107724 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Is it a government institution? Most schools are just government funded?

The double standard is why it's idiotic.
#107726 to #107725 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
it is a government institution, like most state universities

but even if it wasn't private universities that advertise that they support free speech, and students come to the college based on that promise, and then they violate that promise of free speech,
private colleges have been successfully sued under contract law
#107727 to #107726 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Well when they advertise free speech that's with respect to the conduct of students. When it comes to denying an invitee, that's not violating that policy.
#107728 to #107727 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
if it comes to restricting "the free exchange of ideas" which is how it's often phrased,
that can be enough to break the promise

especially if restrictions are based on content
#107729 to #107728 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Again, the policy refers to students. Schools tens to be a little harsher on guest speakers as they're seen as directly endorsing the content.
#107731 to #107729 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
well that's just not true
restricting guest speakers also restricts student access to ideas so it is still a violation
#107732 to #107731 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
A student could hear Shapiro speak at any other venue though.
#107733 to #107732 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
and students could speak at any other venue
that doesn't change the fact that speech is restricted AT THE COLLEGE
#107734 to #107733 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Again, not giving someone a platform isn't restricting their speech.
#107735 to #107734 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
it is if they give other people platforms
and the only reason to deny a platform is because of what they have to say

allowing someone to speak is not an endorsement and it never has been considered one
#107736 to #107735 - theism ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Giving someone a space and an audience is definitely viewed as an endorsement. As a venue they're allowed to decide who can and cannot speak there. They don't have an obligation to allow any guest speakers.
#107711 to #107709 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I would like a link aswell.
#107710 to #107709 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
lolololol do you have a link?
#107691 - anon
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Is "small loan of a million dollars" 2016's "binders full of women" or "you didn't build that"?
#107703 to #107691 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
The small loan of a million dollars part always cracks me up. He's a BILLIONAIRE, yes folks a million to him is small. Just like you'd pick up a ten dollar bill off the ground and Trump wouldn't even use it as paper to wipe his ass. Wow who knew.
#107692 to #107691 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
yes
#107699 to #107684 - anon
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Wow an armed society really is a polite society.
#107689 to #107684 - anon
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
Are you a virgin?
#107686 to #107684 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I live in Houston. I fucking hate this city. It's a puddle of liberals surrounded by conservatives. And I'm stuck in it.
#107687 to #107686 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
after the election of queen dyke i just sorta gave up on metropolitan cities in general
#107685 to #107684 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I just love it when Texas does something that makes the rest of the country nervous.
#107680 - canyou ONLINE
Reply +2
(02/25/2016) [-]
Tomorrow is the day Ben Shapiro is going to give a speech at a university despite sjws shutting the event down already. They said he couldn't speak unless it was alongside other speakers with opposing viewpoints to ensure diversity of opinions was respected. The students who prepared this event two months in advanced will be waiting for him outside of the designated speaking room, and if it's locked, he'll begin to give the speech in the hallway until it's either finished, or he is escorted off the campus by police. This event should be caught on camera by local news teams, and if things go down like I hope they do, it'll be the top story tomorrow on the news.

He's been threatened with physical violence by the students and has been called a white supremicist despite being an orthodox Jew. How fucked is it that what is clearly a leftist university is keeping a conservative Jew from speaking because he isn't diverse enough? I hope he keeps his word and shows up.

I think this is at USCLA.
#107696 to #107680 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(02/25/2016) [-]
>They said he couldn't speak unless it was alongside other speakers with opposing viewpoints to ensure diversity of opinions was respected

muh diversity. But as soon as its a femishit or BLM they can speak all they want without opposition. If someone attacks Shapiro, people should grab that motherfucker and beat him half to death.
#107698 to #107696 - canyou ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
Well on tonight's show he had a camera crew with him. I hope that means he's prepared for some crazy shit tomorrow.

Also yeah, nobody cares about hearing both sides of the argument until the other sides tries to speak up first. Btw, they've made no attempts to actually reschedule his speech. They don't care to. They just want to shut up opposition. He even said it's part of his plan to prove that the left will use "men with guns", aka police, to shut out free speech.

I hope it works out.
#107683 to #107680 - anon
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
I see I'm not the only one who watches the Ben Shapiro podcast.
#107688 to #107683 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm gonna watch today's episode in a few minutes.
#107682 to #107680 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
*California State University Los Angeles
#107679 - anon
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
Guacocast In Memory Of Jeb Bush MISTER METOKUR CURRENTLY LIVESTREAMING
#107681 to #107679 - canyou ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
OH BOY HERE WE GO
#107678 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
SJW just struck my university

there was a complaint about our school song and the uni president has proposed to erase the whole thing except for the first stanza, which is the only bit that's sung at college games

the meaning of the verse is completely not offensive and is about people living in harmony but it calls natives "red man" and that's enough to trigger a hate-speech investigation
#107700 to #107678 - lotengo
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
more info, lyrics perhaps
#107697 to #107678 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
I'm afraid your university has caught sjw, and unfortunately there is no cure.
#107673 - anon
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
Bernie Sanders On The REAL Issues Bernie on the issues.
#107701 to #107673 - lotengo
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
**lotengo used "*roll 6, 0-99*"**
**lotengo rolls 92**
**lotengo rolls 68**
**lotengo rolls 50**
**lotengo rolls 83**
**lotengo rolls 75**
**lotengo rolls 96**
Economist state Bernie will need at least 2 dubs, one of em being 77 or higher, to pay for all his gibsemdats.
Will he have enough dubs?
#107705 to #107701 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
**thumbfortrump used "*roll 1, 1-99*"**
**thumbfortrump rolls 35**

Trump only needs one try.
#107712 to #107705 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
**youregaylol used "*roll 1, 1-1000000*"**
**youregaylol rolls 0,770,253** you are no true trumpman, you need to make your rolls great again
#107713 to #107712 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(02/25/2016) [-]
77, holy numbers, dubs, trump is confirmed
#107745 to #107713 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
**thumbfortrump used "*roll 1, 1-999*"**
**thumbfortrump rolls 880**

trips for jewish conspiracy against trump
#107746 to #107745 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(02/25/2016) [-]
something is definitely fishy
#107667 - xgreenmaidenx
Reply +1
(02/24/2016) [-]
What's going down in Ukraine right now? Haven't heard anything recently.
#107671 to #107667 - valeriya
Reply +2
(02/24/2016) [-]
Minsk agreement round 2 seems to be mostly out the window right now, since the separatists were meant to be reintegrated into Ukraine, which hasn't happened. Corruption was and still is a major problem and hasn't been tackled to no surprise, the president has too much of a vested interest as does the prime minister who was backed by the US much to the US's annoyance. Mikhail Saakashvili was made who you'll remember for being the idiot that got Georgia into a War with Russia was made governor of Odessa and given Ukrainian citizenship so he won't be extradited to face charges of corruption and abuse of power in Georgia... Economy still in the shitter last I heard, and still below soviet levels. Aside from that business as usual really. Enjoy the show.
#107668 to #107667 - anon
Reply +1
(02/24/2016) [-]
Russia won.