Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Highest Rated Top Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds

Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #52204 - pebar (11/22/2013) [-]
Sticker shock: Why are glasses so expensive? So, I found this video and I'm a little bummed. Shakespeare was wrong; names mean a shit ton.
User avatar #52224 to #52204 - Shiny ONLINE (11/22/2013) [-]
Such is the incredible influence that simple branding can have on a market.
User avatar #52218 to #52204 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
this video is not available in ur country...? wtf canada
User avatar #52203 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
"They feel pain. Animals have feelings, they feel pain. And some the people are killing them for meat, fins, leaving them to bleed to death. I am 15 and I am on my way towards being a vegetarian. Our intestines are designed as such that we are all vegetarians, these animals could be extinct anytime. And it wouldnt kill us to eat vegetables. Why waste a life of an animal just to have a meal or two for the day? I hope someday everyone realizes that it is wrong and stop being such selfish creatures ourselves."

Jimmy status: rustled
User avatar #52253 to #52203 - kanadetenshi ONLINE (11/22/2013) [-]
It's true though.
User avatar #52222 to #52203 - undeadwill (11/22/2013) [-]
User avatar #52221 to #52203 - teoberry (11/22/2013) [-]
If they left out everything after the 'I am 15' part it'd be a decent argument
User avatar #52263 to #52202 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/22/2013) [-]
Damn satan's minions giving front hugs...
Christian Side Hug[FULL SONG]
User avatar #52207 to #52202 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
saudi shitrabia, sharia law, islam at work.
#52200 - anon (11/21/2013) [-]
So for those of you that consider yourself pro-lie, how would you feel if a child had a condition like anencephaly?

User avatar #52208 to #52200 - pebar (11/22/2013) [-]
then the child is dying of natural causes, not someone deciding to end another's life

assuming you think a fetus is alive
User avatar #52219 to #52208 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
Your pro-life?

pls no
User avatar #52220 to #52219 - pebar (11/22/2013) [-]
Not really
The whole debate boils down to whether or not a fetus is a person. IMO a clump of cells is just a clump of cells. However the distinction is entirely arbitrary so different people have different opinions. You have to have an amendment that defines when life begins for the debate to go anywhere.
User avatar #52261 to #52220 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
In my opinion it doenst just boil to the fact if its a fetus or a person.
User avatar #52205 to #52200 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
Well the answer's a no-brainer

too funny
#52178 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
Opinion time!

I like Jimmy Carter. He was a great president, a great man. He took it upon himself to do so much and that's extremely commendable. He led negotiations with the Iranian Hostage Crisis and the official treaty was put off until Reagan was put into office, against Carter's will, to try glorify the new president so that he could sell arms to both sides of the Iraqi-Iranian conflict and assist Saddam Hussein while also aiding Ruhollah Khomeini in order for the US to have sway so that Bush Sr. could scout the area for his oil company. If we had kept Carter in office, the war in Afghanistan definitely would not have happened nor would the Gulf War. Discuss.
User avatar #52186 to #52178 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
11/10, would print onto laminated paper and hang onto vintage wooden frame over fire place to gaze upon while drinking hot cocoa on cold winter nights.

Assuming you are serious; how do you explain the fact that Operation Cyclone - the operation that was essentially the brunt of Reagan's supply to Afghani militants - was started under Carter's administration?
User avatar #52188 to #52186 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
Afghanistan isn't part of the picture. Operation Cyclone was to aid those Afghani militants to fight off Soviet Expansion. The Iran-Iraq War is separate.
User avatar #52189 to #52188 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Afghanistan is part of the picture, moreso because of the operation than the Iraq-War because the weapons eventually fell into the hands of Bin Laden and his little crew. And it's relevant because you're implying Carter's administration would've made a difference to the war in Afghanistan when it seems the operations were proceeding no matter who was in the white house.
User avatar #52190 to #52189 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
At the same time, you're forgetting that Carter was a superhero fed by peanuts. You're neglecting his ability to simply crush the competition.
User avatar #52191 to #52190 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Ah. I see where this is going.

But you fail to realize that Carter couldn't hope to stand a chance against Reagan and his pocket full of Krypton lobbyists, which served to his benefit because Carter attempted to run his campaign on pure Superman fuel, which failed ultimately.
After all, how could he crush competition that adhered to his greatest weakness?
User avatar #52193 to #52191 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
Reagan's pretty cool.
User avatar #52194 to #52193 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Eh, he's kind of a dick.
User avatar #52192 to #52191 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
Ah, Mondale would've surely intervened before any sort of damage was done to Carter.
User avatar #52195 to #52192 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Not if Reagan summoned ol' Georgie, in attack mode.
User avatar #52196 to #52195 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
That would've activated the George Wallace trap card.
User avatar #52197 to #52196 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
User avatar #52182 to #52178 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
I hope your fucking joking, i really do.
User avatar #52179 to #52178 - byposted (11/21/2013) [-]

Jimmy Carter Iranian Helicopter Crash Speech 1980 ElectionWallDotOrg.flv
User avatar #52181 to #52179 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
It's not like he could control what happened. He simply gave the orders. The pilot(s) are the ones who fucked up.
User avatar #52174 - roliga (11/21/2013) [-]
@WZ In other news, a wild chimpanzee has been shot two times after participating in a game called "knockout" with his fellow pavement apes. The young niglet is serving one year is jail.
#52175 to #52174 - byposted (11/21/2013) [-]
>the city's first reported victim   
"Knockout" is typical negroid behavior; the problem is not the "game." In a typical media report, this altercation would be vaguely named as an "assault." Certainly, the man was not the first victim of black on white violence.
>the city's first reported victim

"Knockout" is typical negroid behavior; the problem is not the "game." In a typical media report, this altercation would be vaguely named as an "assault." Certainly, the man was not the first victim of black on white violence.
User avatar #52185 to #52170 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
are you russian?

also that second link, for a second there i thought it was a video game
User avatar #52209 to #52185 - jadewest (11/22/2013) [-]
far from it
User avatar #52210 to #52209 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
is that an answer to my question or my statement?
User avatar #52211 to #52210 - jadewest (11/22/2013) [-]
User avatar #52212 to #52211 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
why was the second link in russian then?
User avatar #52213 to #52212 - jadewest (11/22/2013) [-]
it doesn't load in russian for me, maybe yours is fucked
User avatar #52214 to #52213 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
maybe ur mom is?
User avatar #52215 to #52214 - jadewest (11/22/2013) [-]
hard to fuck a dead woman
User avatar #52216 to #52215 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
PhD in necrophilia

your looking at it
User avatar #52171 to #52170 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Sooo, they're trying to kill two birds with one stone by pushing gun control but also pushing to ban violent video games?
Also, I don't this game is very accurate. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure Adam Lanza didn't have peg legs that leaked goop all over the place.
User avatar #52172 to #52171 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
I don't think*
User avatar #52173 to #52172 - roliga (11/21/2013) [-]
That's what da gubmint wants ya to tink...
User avatar #52169 - schnizel (11/21/2013) [-]
White Kid Targeted For Hate Crime by School Bus Full of Blacks
#52162 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
Can remove kebab refer to all Muslims in Europe and not only Turks?
#52161 - anon (11/21/2013) [-]
Is Ann Coulter serious, or is she just a mediawhore that says controversial things for attention?
I just have trouble taking her seriously, she fits practically every way Liberals try to caricature the Republican Party to a tee.
#52157 - anon (11/21/2013) [-]
User avatar #52163 to #52157 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]
He farts and these farts raise the alarm for the shit storm that awaits
#52147 - pebar (11/21/2013) [-]
What's something that we on this board actually disagree on?
User avatar #52155 to #52147 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]
Capitalist vs. communist
Or capitalist vs fascists
Or capitalist and other capitalist
Damn capitalists ! They ruined capitalism!
User avatar #52176 to #52155 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
You capitalists sure are a contentious people.
User avatar #52206 to #52176 - lulzforhiroshima (11/22/2013) [-]
shut up u dumb nazi, commie jew, no one likes yo' types around here.
User avatar #52177 to #52176 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]
User avatar #52146 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]

To be honest bush is pretty fucking cool.
User avatar #52164 to #52146 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
No shit Bush is fucking cool, he's from Texas and he's right.
User avatar #52166 to #52164 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]
Bush wasn't so bad compared to who we have now.
User avatar #52167 to #52166 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
I don't think Bush was bad to begin with, well at least compared to Obama.
#52156 to #52144 - CapnInterwebz (11/21/2013) [-]
Now just how the fuck is that even possible to do?
Now just how the fuck is that even possible to do?
User avatar #52165 to #52156 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
The 275 people in a town part.
#52143 - feelythefeel has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #52180 to #52137 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
While I agree that his views are much too extreme, I do say that flag burning should be legal. I mean, Texas v. Johnson in 1989 already determined that flag burning is an expression of speech. As it doesn't harm anyone, I see no issue with it. And as for vandalism of national monuments, that's apples to oranges. Monuments are owned by the federal government, your own personal flag isn't. Once something is your property, in your possession, you can do what you want with it as long as it doesn't present a danger to the public.
User avatar #52183 to #52180 - byposted (11/21/2013) [-]
I find the problem to be this expansion of what "speech" designates. The Supreme Court is due to define money as speech, further turning elections into corporate undertakings.

Can it be my "speech" to pull down my pants in the middle of the road and begin doing my business? It can be, but it goes against public decency and thus is not sanctioned under law. I cannot even do this on my front yard, even though it is my property, for this very reason. Public codes in general can be said to be a violation of speech, expanding this thought. What right is it for some state workers to tell me that I can't have an air conditioner in my window?

Jurisprudence has its basis in the linking of state and society, and the flag is the symbol of society. Flag desecration being sanctioned under the law is an irony, in my opinion, as such.
User avatar #52187 to #52183 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
As I said, the action of burning a flag doesn't harm anyone else. Jacking on a street corner or your front yard does. As ironic as it is, flag burning is protected as it should be. The United States has a duty it would seem to protect the accused instead of just laying down punishments. Though the speech may not be popular and offensive to some, those opinions are protected.
User avatar #52198 to #52187 - byposted (11/21/2013) [-]
I know we disagree but the way in which "harm" is being used here is silly.

I could argue that jacking off on a streetcorner doesn't "harm" anyone else either. Burning a flag and jacking off both have the same shocking effects to the public, but neither result in people dropping dead. Why, don't you remember when it was illegal for womyn to dress a certain way and for blacks to drink at certain water fountains by "bigoted" standards?

Billionaires being able to pool tons of money into campaigns doesn't "harm" anybody either. So why continue to regulate campaigns? That's a violation of "speech," etc.

Note that "speech" has gone beyond simply "opinions" by this slippery slope. I, of course, do not consider flag desecration to be an expounding of "opinions" as I have studied the foundations of law. It is dangerous to disregard fundamental truths; law does not exist to protect "speech" in all of its manifestations but to regulate the nation.
User avatar #52199 to #52198 - lightarcanine (11/21/2013) [-]
I know that you're rather deep-rooted in your opinions, as am I, so I feel it would be best to end this argument now. I have much more I could say, but I'm tired and I have a paper to write.

Take care of yourself.
User avatar #52184 to #52183 - byposted (11/21/2013) [-]
Rather, the flag would be a symbol of both.
User avatar #52158 to #52137 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
Yes, but the sentence should be something soft, just so it simply transmits a "shame on you".
User avatar #52145 to #52137 - undeadwill (11/21/2013) [-]
da fuk?
User avatar #52139 to #52137 - akkere ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
"Reagan fucks Satan in hell"
That's a porn I think we can all do without.
#52114 - anon (11/20/2013) [-]
Is there like a map or anything where you can see the territory in Syria?
Like if areas are under control by the army or occupied by the opposition?
#52117 to #52114 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
This is an old map from earlier this year. (red = SAA, yellow = Kurds, green = Israeli/Saudi Nomadic Goat Herders). Much progress has been made since this map was published: No longer is the situation around Damascus so precarious as is recently evidenced by the capture of Qara, the situation in the southwest near Daraa is very good, Homs's outlying territories are being cleansed, gains in Idlib have been seen these past months with concurrent advances on Aleppo's east and the Kurds have been doing well to put pressure on the ISIL in particular. Insha'Allah, Assad should cleanse them after the goat herders are taken care of!

Song for the Syrian Army - our victory is inevitable
#52116 to #52114 - pebar (11/20/2013) [-]
it's from march so it's probably outdated
User avatar #52125 to #52116 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
If it's simply portraying terrorist "activity," of course not. They are still capable of killing civilians in Damascus as they have. It's just that they are the ones fleeing in the Damascus provinces now. It is indeed outdated on plenty of the cities, though. Homs and Qusayr have long been liberated.
#52112 - anon (11/20/2013) [-]
A socialist is mad as fuck at me because I'm going to be inheriting a lot of money, and I asked him how I should invest in it

Is this a common trait in socialism?
User avatar #52136 to #52112 - lulzforhiroshima (11/21/2013) [-]
You should invest it into a market that will lead you to profit such as buying a property. This is what my Dad did multiple times in Florida and is leaving me for inheritance other then the house and cars.
#52371 to #52136 - anon (11/24/2013) [-]
Actually, I did say i was inheriting money.

But I'll be inheriting like...180 houses
User avatar #52377 to #52371 - lulzforhiroshima (11/24/2013) [-]
i know you said your inheriting money, thats why i said you should invest it somehow into the market so i dont really get what you were thinking when you wrote that

Also 180 houses? So your gonna be getting like in the 10's of millions?
User avatar #52131 to #52112 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
Generally, socialists aren't very fond of inheritance, most of us want it to be at least temporarily abolished as soon as the Dictatorship of the Proletariat is estabilished.
User avatar #52133 to #52131 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
But I understand your ideology. I just don't get the "temporary abolishment" part.
User avatar #52134 to #52133 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
I might've understood it wrong and not be as temporary as I assumed.
#52132 to #52131 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
Marxian socialists*    
Inheritance is private property. A "temporary" abolishment of inheritance would soon turn into the, theoretically at least, confiscation of all private property. Picture related.
Marxian socialists*

Inheritance is private property. A "temporary" abolishment of inheritance would soon turn into the, theoretically at least, confiscation of all private property. Picture related.
User avatar #52126 to #52112 - maddboiy (11/20/2013) [-]
tell him you're going to invest it in buying a factory in Malaysia and utilise it's cheap Labour to obtain maximum surplus value. Then stand back and watch his head explode with anger
User avatar #52115 to #52112 - pebar (11/20/2013) [-]
Milton Friedman - Redistribution of Wealth Yes, socialists blame the bourgeoisie for taking care of their own through things like inheritance.
#52122 to #52115 - anon (11/20/2013) [-]

he actually called me a bourgeoisie multiple times

what does it even mean?
User avatar #52135 to #52122 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
By socialist definition, it's the ruling class under capitalism.
User avatar #52159 to #52135 - jewishcommunazi ONLINE (11/21/2013) [-]
You probably just meant burgeois though, he might be mad at you, but not to the point where he calls you an entire social class.
User avatar #52124 to #52122 - pebar (11/20/2013) [-]
The owners of the means of production (like factory equipment), unlike the proletariat who sell their labor for a wage.

basically employers
User avatar #52123 to #52122 - azumeow (11/20/2013) [-]
Basically, rich snobby asshole.
#52127 to #52123 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
Not really. Socialists make it sound that way because they're all members of this class themselves. They're stuck well into the last century and assume they're working in coal mines as they read Marx.
User avatar #52128 to #52127 - azumeow (11/20/2013) [-]
I know that's not the actual definition, but I was just trying to explain it in context. I will sit here in my wrongness and be wrong, though.
User avatar #52129 to #52128 - byposted (11/20/2013) [-]
You may understand it but OP may not. Socialists are almost all well off and in college. In that sense, they're not very different from old Socialists except that they live in a much different world than their predecessors. They are championing around 15 dollar minimum wage in Chicago as if it has connection with the Pullman strikes. Quite silly.
User avatar #52148 to #52107 - marinepenguin (11/21/2013) [-]
"Assault weapons" isn't even a real term. The media fucked it up and made a new category of weaponry. Assault Rifle would be the correct term, but guns they describe have handguns and submachine guns involved and those are totally wrong.
User avatar #52109 to #52107 - pebar (11/20/2013) [-]
It makes slightly more sense than banning guns because of pistol grips and flash hiders, but banning a 9mm fmj because it has too much stopping power is laughable.
User avatar #52110 to #52109 - undeadwill (11/20/2013) [-]
Wait what? They said the 9mm is too much? The fuck?
User avatar #52102 - Shiny ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
You need to login to view this link

How long can you last, politics board?
 Friends (0)