Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (3): figatron, fukkentyranitar, whitechino, anonymous(5).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#111704 - shekelnator
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
twitter.com/USEmbassySyria/status/714876476504444928
This US embassy of sluts are out of their mind. it is like saying in cute lil underhanded way: FUCK YOU ASSAD AND PUTING. FUCK YOU!
#111702 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
My official stance on the lewendowsky thing is that he probably did grab her, but she strongly exaggerated her "injury" for a story.
#111802 to #111702 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/30/2016) [-]
He definitely grabbed her. She's overstated the 'injury' though.
#111708 to #111702 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
As I recall, she did not make a big deal out of it in the beginning
It was only when Breitbart called her a liar did things get out of hand
#111716 to #111708 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
GrabGate Debunked Conclusive Proof Michelle Fields Lying About Trump Campaign Lewandowski Assault "the worst experience of her life after her father dying"
#111709 to #111708 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Oh yeah, I'm still shocked Shapiro quit
#111701 - loomiss ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Speaks Volumes Anti Racism Activist  Educator Jane Elliot Speaks To White Citizens On Receiving

Truth
#111695 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
#111703 to #111695 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Which one is jewindowsky?
#111706 to #111703 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
He's thinner than I though he'd be.
#111705 to #111703 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
Jupiter police release video showing Corey Lewandowski grab Michelle Fields Lewandowski is the black suit in the circle
former breitbart report is in tan sweater
>>#111698
#111698 to #111695 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
what am I seeing here ?
#111717 to #111698 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
a slight nudge used millions of times a day in any metropolitan area
#111694 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/corey-lewandowski-arrested/475827/

youregaylol, remember when you said it was proven a hoax?
course you do /politics/110079#110079
#111715 to #111694 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
GrabGate Debunked Conclusive Proof Michelle Fields Lying About Trump Campaign Lewandowski Assault In other news, libertarians support the government arresting people for tiny nudges.
#111699 to #111694 - anon
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
So I'm trying to understand what happened. Michelle, a woman with probably the arms of a Holocaust victim had her arm grabbed firmly by Lewandoski as she walked into him causing him to push her slightly aside so he can continue walking behind Trump...and that's it?

Literally who cares...
#111700 to #111699 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
forgot2login
#111707 to #111700 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
The incident caused Ben Shapiro to resign from Breitbart since they were willing to deny reality to continue jerking off Trump
#111711 to #111707 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Yes I watch Ben Shapiro and everything else you do, I know. I just think he made too big of a deal out of it is all.
#111690 - asotil
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
#111691 to #111688 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Mister Metokur actually did a video on why this was a setup and the reporter is a cunt.
#111696 to #111691 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
I love mister metokur but I'm not sure about that vid
#111692 to #111691 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
I'm sure the police department will be convinced by a youtube vid.
#111681 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
www.sltrib.com/home/3714826-155/chicagos-rating-after-pension-overhaul-dashed

daily reminder that public sector unions quite literally bankrupt governments
#111684 to #111681 - anon
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Why should the government be the only employer who's workers can't organize?
#111686 to #111684 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
Andrew Klavan Behold Your Public Sector Unions at Work because governments fund the unions and unions use those funds to lobby for more funds

it's so much that I want to ban public unions outright, because I don't
I just think public sector management in general is so pussified that they will throw away tax dollars because they are not the ones who pay the cost. The biggest difference between public and private unions is that there is a trade off between the company and the union
there is no such trade off with public unions
#111673 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
www.rt.com/news/337510-hijacked-egyptian-plane-cyprus/

habbening underway

March may be the most peaceful month of all time
#111676 to #111673 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Habbening cancelled, apparently caused by lovestruck professor who wanted to see ex-wife.
The things you do for love
#111679 to #111676 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
My newspapers said he wanted to force asylum by hijacking a plane
#111680 to #111679 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
hahahahah fuckin retard
#111812 to #111680 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/30/2016) [-]
Someone had a selfie with that dude
#111685 to #111680 - lotengo
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
twas just a prank
#111687 to #111685 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Prank Nation: Hijack Prank (GONE SEXUAL)
#111670 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Free Trade supporters:
Pretty much the entire economic consensus.

Protectionist supporters:
Occupy protesters with anon masks and Trump supporters who didn't know what protectionism was before Trump talked about it.
#111672 to #111670 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
rood
#111675 to #111672 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
Srry bby i didn't mean it. <3
#111665 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
If the democrat vs republican parties were replaced with a nationalist vs libertarian parties
how stable do you think it would be?

Do you think the population would align more with that arrangement than with the current one?
Keep in mind congress has a 10% approval rating

this is not about what you personally believe
rather it is what your perception of what other people believe is
#111668 to #111665 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
...why did you break it down into "nationalist" vs "libertarian"? Are you literally saying libertarianism is inherently anti-nationalist? If that's the case I think most people will jump on the nationalist train as will I because fuck that.
#111669 to #111668 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/29/2016) [-]
socially controlling and backwards economics
they're pretty conflicting

there's a big difference between nationalism and patriotism
#111677 to #111669 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
I think I'll honestly take nationalism.
#111671 to #111669 - figatron
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Socially controlling and backwards economics you're confusing nationalism with fascism. Nationalism isn't an over arching political platform its more of a cultural dynamic. It can be good. Countries like Italy and Germany would be a cluster fuck of warring city states. Liberty and nationalism can co exist as nationalism does not require statism
#111674 to #111671 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
I think to avoid further semantics on this we need to define some terms, primarily there's two main forms of nationalism. Risorgimento nationalism and Integral nationalism.

Risorgimento or civic nationalism promotes national unity and pride on a cultural level while being politically individualist and classically liberal. The early United States is a good example of this.

Integral nationalism on the other hand relies on government force and authoritarianism to promote benefit and superiority of one nation on the expense of others. This form of nationalism often promotes isolationist/protectionist economics, collectivism, centralized government, and jingoism. This form of nationalism is more well known in European history with fascism being it's most extreme example.

So when we discuss nationalism it's probably important to distinguish these two.
#111666 to #111665 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Whether the population will align with it will purely depend on how much of an impact a president had on you. FDR created a revolution for progressives, Reagan did the same for conservatives. Neither where really that good but they had the charisma.
#111658 - anon
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
As far as policies are considered, which candid's is superior, and why is it Hillary's?
#111661 to #111658 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
for polices, they're all awful

but ted cruz is least awful
Gary Johnson is virtually ideal, but he doesn't count
#111643 - alimais
Reply +2
(03/28/2016) [-]
www.ibtimes.com/who-larry-dawson-capitol-shooter-washington-dc-tennessee-man-familiar-police-2344454
>The U.S. Capitol complex was placed under lockdown Monday after shots were fired at the entrance to the Capitol’s visitor’s center. Larry Dawson, of Tennessee, was believed to be the sole suspect involved in the incident.
>The shooter was taken to the Washington Hospital Center under police escort after he was shot by officials, the Washington Post reported. Dawson apparently interrupted a House session last fall yelling that he was the "prophet of God," the Daily Beast reported.
#111633 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
ITT: Does artificial intelligence get freedom of speech?
#111689 to #111633 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
As long as it agrees with me
#111667 to #111633 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
That's up for the person who created the A.I
#111662 to #111633 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
the speech of the machine is the speech of the creator
to silence the machine is to silence the creator

however the creator always has the option to silence himself, as that is his own choice
likewise it is the option of the creator to silence the machine
#111656 to #111633 - thereasonableperso
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Never. AI are products of man and thus disposable. No matter how advanced they become they will always be controlled.
#111649 to #111633 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
I think that eventually AIs and robots will become so sophisticated that they'll be nearly indistinguishable from human beings in terms of looks and especially behavior.

I think once this happens robots being treated as human beings with rights and desires of their own will be inevitable in time.
#111648 to #111633 - akkere
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Given property rights, the fundamental idea to most nations' constitutions referring to 'human' rights, and other legislative ideals that are to be taken into consideration before cutting into the moral aspect alone, probably not.
#111646 to #111633 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Is this a trick question?
#111657 to #111646 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/29/2016) [-]
Yes. Maybe. Idk
#111642 to #111633 - cognosceteipsum
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Of course.
#111641 to #111633 - jettom
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
No
#111639 to #111633 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/28/2016) [-]
No.

Man above machine. Forever and always.
#111640 to #111639 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/28/2016) [-]
You damn machinist.
#111635 to #111633 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
depends how smart it is.
#111620 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(03/28/2016) [-]
This site is becoming increasingly depressing.
#111621 to #111620 - cognosceteipsum
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Blog tastic!
#111618 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
It's easier to say you have the prettiest wife when you trade in the old one every ten years.
#111619 to #111618 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Doesn't change that you have the prettiest wife.
#111613 - joshlol
Reply +1
(03/28/2016) [-]
#111614 to #111613 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/28/2016) [-]
Please, only those who are worthy of being president may lift the hair of Trump.