Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (2): PopcornViking, thereasonableperso, anonymous(27).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#109685 to #109634 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
These people won't even let you speak out against ISIS or in favor of "problematic" left thought either, they'd get triggered by RDW or Zizek if they spoke out (and often do in practice, too).

It's not ideologically motivated, it's the result of baby boomer parenting.
#109657 to #109634 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Dude writes like a major dickhole though.
#109664 to #109657 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
"I'm going to write meaningless, stupid shit just for the sake of playing devil's advocate"
#109666 to #109664 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
No, the guy actually seems like a massive tool. Based on this one article of course. So you can fuck right off.
#109667 to #109666 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
What did he write that was so horrible that you had to undermine the main point in search of a justification?
#109668 to #109667 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Why do you think I'm undermining the main point? Maybe I just think he's a dick.
#109669 to #109668 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I'm waiting for those horrible quotes.
#109670 to #109669 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I don't really give a shit what you're waiting for.
#109671 to #109670 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I guess my main point stands, saying stupid shit for the sake of playing devils' advocate. Congrats on your diversity points bud, you sure showed us.
#109672 to #109671 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Why do you feel the need to pick fights over stupid shit? Why are you such a tool?
#109655 to #109634 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
So does that mean he is legitimately fired? No articles except from breitbart about this.
#109635 to #109634 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Leftists only fight for the rights of extreme degenerates.
#109701 to #109635 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
The degenerates are right wingers.
#109633 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Why is the death penalty around in only half the states when the majority of people, Democrap or Republican, agree with it?
#109691 to #109633 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I'm sorry I meant the trials were the cause of the cost. But I'm not sure what degree of due process is required.
#109692 to #109691 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Yes, the system should definitely be changed. People given the death penalty should not have the write to appeal the motion unless new evidence is presented.
#109693 to #109692 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Don't they deserve due process?
#109694 to #109693 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Most of the huge cost comes from the fact that you can try to appeal the motion multiple times through a long period of time. People given the death penalty are given it so because they have committed horrible acts and there is enormous evidence for it, there should be no right to appeal against it unless new evidence is presented because its not neccesary at all. Post-civl rights of course
#109695 to #109694 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
So then every death penalty conviction is accurate?
#109704 to #109695 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
So then every conviction is accurate?

I know exactly where you are going and its such a horrible argument, think it through before you ask it.
#109705 to #109704 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
What I'm saying is appeals exist for a reason. Death penalty is a fairly permanent solution. I'd say it meets a higher burden of proof.
#109706 to #109705 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
Yes, and we already went through this before. Death penalty is given and SHOULD be given in the hypothetical scenario of the restructuring of the criminal justice system a high burden of proof. When we 100% fucking percent know they did it, like we can attain through multiple witnesses, camera, or DNA tests that prove what happened, then they should be killed and given no appeal because it literally is not neccesary. And for the horrible crimes we speak of like most first degree murder cases, its obvious.
#109707 to #109706 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
So until we can 100% prove these crimes should we deny the accused the same rights we give others?
#109708 to #109707 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
Explain.
#109709 to #109708 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
It's the accused's right to appeal their sentence yes?
#109710 to #109709 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
Yes, unless death penalty is given.
#109711 to #109710 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
Under the current system they can appeal right?
#109712 to #109711 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
Yes, and in the hypothetical perfect scenario I'm talking about when we reform the system to be much more capital punishment friendly, they wont. And I've explained why.
#109713 to #109712 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
With 100% perfect proof appeals won't be necessary. Absent that though do appeals serve no purpose?
#109721 to #109713 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
They kinda do.
#109722 to #109721 - theism
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
So then you feel there is sufficient certainty?
#109637 to #109633 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Voting booths are too hard for most conservatives to use apparently.
#109648 to #109637 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I can't tell if you're baiting now a days or not, because you clearly ignored what I wrote.
#109650 to #109648 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Do you read what you write?
#109651 to #109650 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
"majority of people, Democrap"
Pay attention
#109652 to #109651 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
That's not really provable from your picture.
#109653 to #109652 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Maybe you should learn how to read.
#109654 to #109653 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I don't know if the respondents were evenly divided along party lines. Could be 10 million republicans and 5 million democrats.
#109658 to #109654 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Nope, it was approximately 4 million for each with slightly more Democrats
#109659 to #109658 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
How does it look broken down by region?
#109674 to #109673 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
You'd think people would push this issue then.
#109675 to #109674 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
It's not politically correct for anyone to push it.

"I know we got a lot of problems on our plate, but I really think we should take another look at dem capital punishment laws and really re-up the killin again"
#109676 to #109675 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I'm talking about citizens. Why not try to get it on referendum?
#109677 to #109676 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I don't fuckin know niga.
#109678 to #109677 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
It makes me wonder if the poll might be skewed. Maybe not but it's odd it's not represented elsewhere.
#109679 to #109678 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I don't think its much of a surprise that most people believe in death penalty for the most horrendous of crimes.
#109686 to #109679 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I disagree due purely to the cost but that's just me.
#109688 to #109686 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
That's because we do it completely inefficiently. It should be done through inert gas asphyxiation or firing squad, and it shouldn't be delayed as much as it is now.
#109689 to #109688 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
No it's the necessary series of trials to ensure due process.
#109690 to #109689 - unforgivensoul
0
(03/10/2016) [-]
No, delaying it for 5 years is not neccesary.
#109619 to #109616 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
So that means they don't want people saving their money, right?
#109620 to #109619 - lotengo
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Economy is my weakest point when it comes to discussing politics. But it feels like they want people to spend money, possibly to delay an upcoming crisis.

I got the urge to buy canned food all of a sudden
#109624 to #109620 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
get one of those 50 pound buckets of rice from costco that has a shelf life of 30 years
#109626 to #109624 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Driving to the nearest costco and back (Paris) would take me 10 hours and over 60 liters of fuel.

#109681 to #109626 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Buy some from Libor down the road
#109682 to #109681 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
a what?
#109683 to #109682 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Crazy Libor down the road, with the limp and the fancy tractor. Trade him some liquor for crops
#109627 to #109626 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
that sucks, man
costco is life
#109621 to #109620 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Let's not forget that negative interest rates are a thing. So far all they've done is make it unprofitable to save money. Soon they could punish you for it.
#109623 to #109621 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
pebar

This actually implies you are getting a tad punished because money saved on the bank will now slowely lose value because of inflation
#109625 to #109623 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
real interest rate = nominal interest rate (face value) - inflation rate

this is always the case
#109617 to #109616 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
that would be the opposite of burning money
#109618 to #109617 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Keeping it in the bank would be like burning money
#109622 to #109618 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Banks keep their reserves in the central bank
the central bank sometimes pays interest on those reserves
by not paying interest on reserves, banks have less incentive to keep their reserves in the central bank
negative rates on excess reserves, what Japan and ECB are doing, effectively creates a penalty for banks that don't loan out money.
#109610 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
What do you think about Brigitte Gabriel en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigitte_Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel ber die Islamisierung des Libanon
#109614 to #109610 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>When i read Christians United for Israel
#109608 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Statement by Martin Schulz on the immediate exclusion of Eleftherios Synadinos GoldenDawn Greece

Golden Dawn was absolutely BTFO in the European Parliament yesterday.
#109600 - anon
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Zootopia was actually pretty redpilled.
#109602 to #109600 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Jew haters also confirmed furries, what a surprise.
#109808 to #109602 - undeadwill
Reply 0
(03/12/2016) [-]
I think its a telling of how treat narratives work, after all who would suspect a lamb of ill intent among the wolves?
#109632 to #109586 - pebar
Reply +2
(03/10/2016) [-]
#109595 to #109586 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35769634

Days without beating up journalists: 0
#109596 to #109595 - shekelnator
Reply +3
(03/10/2016) [-]
>BBC
#109598 to #109596 - thumbfortrump
Reply +6
(03/10/2016) [-]
>criticizes BBC
>links to RT
#109601 to #109599 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
The Taqiyya is strong in you :^)
#109603 to #109601 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>>>>KSA
#109604 to #109603 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Assad din du nuffin
he wus a gud boy
bout to get his land on track
need mo barrels fo them civilian bombings
#109605 to #109604 - shekelnator
Reply -1
(03/10/2016) [-]
living in your fantasy land arent you?
#109611 to #109606 - alimais
Reply -1
(03/10/2016) [-]
What I got from the links :

>The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights now claims
>The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights now claims
>The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights now claims

The source all of those news articles cite is a fat arab dude living in England who hates Assad and was 11-12 years ago in Syria
#109612 to #109611 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
You dismiss any proof thrown at you so I won't bother discussing it with you.
At least the US admits it when hitting civilians. According to Assad and Putin, not a single civilian has been killed by SAA or the Russian army. And you actually believe it lol. You're only succeding in fooling yourselves.
#109613 to #109612 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Why should I take the claims of a one-man run organisation or a organisation which gets its funds from George Soros as proof?

I'm hella sure enough strikes hit civilians and just like in Israel there's a shit ton of Pallywood involved explains Pallywood youtu.be/tN1MkAGuVyY?t=3m15s since there are not only ISIS Jihadist but a shit ton of different Jihadist groups labeled as rebels even Al-Nusra was labeled as rebels in the media from time to time

#109590 to #109586 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
While these incidents are terrible, they haven't been increasing in occurance. The amount of school shootings every year has generally remained around the same these past 60-70 years.
#109591 to #109590 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
you guys need a solution for this. it is like 0 peace in USA and huge chance of 50% being killed.
#109594 to #109591 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Not really though. Only place you're really risking getting shot is in a bad inner city neighborhood and acting like a fool. The likelihood of getting shot in the streets in the US is like getting struck by lightning.
#109597 to #109594 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
you still wanna and must do something about it. it is like all jihadi states there where you kill someone you dont like
#109628 to #109597 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Yes, no one wants to see children killed in school shootings, but acting like they're becoming more prevalent over time, or that people are just getting shot everywhere in America, only makes the problem worse. It does nothing to address the actual issue.
#109629 to #109628 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
your country should give the adult people guns and only the people who dont have criminal history of psychological disease or mental illness.
#109630 to #109629 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
That's already a thing. Most places make you have to be 16 or older to own a weapon, and you have to be 18-21 to purchase your own.

There's also no such thing as a " gun show loophole" as they still do background checks there and people with mental issues or criminal history don't have access to firearms.
#109592 to #109591 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>syrians
>talking about peace

kek
#109593 to #109592 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
oh hello turkroach
#109588 to #109586 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
this is the price of freedom
#109568 to #109561 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Tag des Anschlusses verdammt wen?
#109563 to #109561 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Don't forget this shithole of a country is far closer to European politics than American.

Just imagine electing a white, even stupider Ed Milliband after 9 years of David Cameron.
#109567 to #109563 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
There's no way Labour could ever win the election with Corbyn.
#109569 to #109567 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Too bad, Corbyn is fucking based.

Labour needs to be a real alternative to the Tories and Lib Dems, not more "check your privilege"
#109574 to #109569 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Labour is going to remain in the opposition for a long time until they get their shit together. And if there wasn't First Past The Post voting i would bet that they would be wiped out in the future.

They can't get elected with moderate Blairites, they won't get elected by a full blown far leftist like Corbyn, and they couldn't get elected with a middle ground between the two like Ed Milliband. They're crushing themselves by infighting and they're being replaced by a bunch of pissed Scots.

Literally all Conservatives have to do is not fuck up as badly as them.
#109571 to #109569 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>implying this will ever happen
>imypling labour isnt SJW like all leftist parties
#109581 to #109571 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Not true, some leftist parties are Trotskyist groups that multiply like bacteria.
#109583 to #109581 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
All popular leftist parties in Western countries today are very SJW, I have no idea about very small commie parties.
#109552 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Political test: ultimate edition

Do the test, use the importance scale and expand all questions from each section. Post results like this, preferably with the other info.

They added other candidates, added more stances and questions since last time we took them several months ago, so its worthy of doing again.
www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential-quiz

www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2124925868 feel free to compare with me if you want
#109741 to #109740 - jewishcommunazi
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
I didn't use the importance scale or expand questions though.
#109656 to #109552 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I did post the rest ya dip. I literally went down and screenshotted all of it.
#109660 to #109656 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I know, its just that you could have put it all together and I also hadn't scrolled down enough to see the rest.
#109696 to #109660 - mvtjets ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
you are never allowed to use my meme again
#109703 to #109696 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
>im a bigger MDE fan than you
#109727 to #109703 - mvtjets ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
#109661 to #109660 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I'm on my phone and that would have been a lot of work.
#109663 to #109661 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
oh, gay
#109649 to #109636 - unforgivensoul
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#109638 to #109636 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Last time I had Trump as my number 1, and both dems were under 50%.
#109645 to #109644 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Overall this made me think a little bit. I may end up voting for Gary Johnson, but it's quickly becoming clear that I like Cruz more than Trump as time goes on. There are many things I like about Trump, but the things I really don't like bother me.
#109662 to #109645 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Voting for Johnson is throwing away your vote, please don't. Also you can use an image combiner like I did instead of posting this in separate images.
#109665 to #109662 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Maybe. It's better than blatantly voting against some of my interests. I'd like to support the rise of another party, but it's not worth it if that means that the democrats remain intact while the republicans fall apart even more than they already are.

I fucking hate parties in the first place, but they're inevitable.
#109698 to #109665 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
voting for the 3rd party is voting for the leader, because its a vote the 2nd place doesnt get

youre just gonna have to decide which main candidate you dislike the least

#109730 to #109698 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
That's gonna end up being whoever the republican candidate is. Because honestly if you put a gun to my head and told me to vote for Hillary or Bernie, I'd probably just tell you to pull the trigger.
#109609 to #109552 - zlane
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
#109631 to #109609 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
>bernie
>4%
holy shit nice
#109585 to #109552 - PopcornViking ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
#109697 to #109585 - mvtjets ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
wew
#109566 to #109552 - Shiny
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Hah, I voted for her in 2012. Too bad her party is generally awful.

I'm also 99% sure that Clinton is paying lip service to most of the topics whether or not I "agreed" with her said stance
#109646 to #109566 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
91% Sanders, wow
#109684 to #109646 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
You sound shocked?
#109729 to #109684 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
I was expecting more agreement than myself obviously. But I didn't think you were quite that similar as Bernie in ideology .
#109732 to #109729 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
American politics, and most national politics to a lesser extent, tend to be very limited in scope compared to what could be discussed, i.e. the Overton window. Quizzes like this are relative, not absolute.
#109733 to #109732 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
I agree. I find that when I look at candidates, I have to settle, because none truly fit my world view. The republicans just fit less badly than the democrats. Many of my political views would fall outside of that window it seems.
#109734 to #109733 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/11/2016) [-]
I accept it. The candidates I would have voted for were rotting in jail anyway.
#109565 to #109552 - kanadetenshi
Reply +2
(03/10/2016) [-]
I agree with 72% of you. On economic, domestic policy, social, healthcare, education, electoral, and criminal issues
#109647 to #109565 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
We're very similar in our political beliefs it seems.
#109564 to #109552 - kanadetenshi
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#109560 to #109552 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
The "other responses" parts seem redundant. In the same sex marriage question, for example, one extra answer is "yes, but churches shouldn't be forced to marry" even though state marriage is wholly unrelated.
#109562 to #109560 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
The more choice, the better. Can't argue against that. Do the fucking test fagget
#109546 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
DARTH TRUMP  Auralnauts Shit's great
#109538 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Well how about that.
#109575 to #109538 - Elk
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
#109570 to #109538 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Gary Johnson is okay for a righty.
#109573 to #109570 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I thought you hated libertarian economics.
#109543 to #109538 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Why the fuck is Bernie 73% for you, that makes literally no fucking sense.
#109549 to #109543 - anon
Reply -1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Because his IQ is more than two digits :^)
#109548 to #109543 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Yeah that's what I don't get. He's basically tied with Trump.
#109550 to #109548 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Can you check what you agreed with him on? There's a whole section for that.
#109551 to #109550 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
**canyou checks**
#109553 to #109551 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Did you expand questions from the cateogires and use the importance scale? Because honestly I know this test is accurate and you just lost mad respect nigga.
#109554 to #109553 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Yes I did. I tried to be honest.
#109555 to #109554 - unforgivensoul
Reply -1
(03/10/2016) [-]
...mad respect lost... mad respect.
#109557 to #109555 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
What was it specifically that upset you? Healthcare?
#109558 to #109557 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>73%
enough said
#109559 to #109558 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
...

FUCK YOU
#109556 to #109555 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
oh
#109542 to #109538 - unforgivensoul
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#109544 to #109542 - unforgivensoul
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#109540 to #109538 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
#109534 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
So anyone here watch House of Cards?

If not I strongly recommend it since its the most political show on Earth and yet one of the most entertaining ones by far. Top 3.
#109539 to #109523 - valeriya
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Evolutionary psychology... Ha.
#109579 to #109539 - anon
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
you know you want to get fucked hard by a strong right wing bodybuilder, dont even lie
#109533 to #109523 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
It'll be interesting to see if this gets reproduced.
#109578 to #109533 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I've seen myself go through the same sort of shift, as I've lifted weights and gotten stronger and more disciplined in my personal life, I value things like personal responsibility and freedom of choice more, and I've become more conservative in a lot of ways.

Whether that's a direct result of my lifestyle or just me maturing as an individual is debatable though.
#109580 to #109578 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I'm talking about the science. If every researcher that tries this comes up with a different result, the science probably isn't there.

But honestly if it's about conservative economics that's really not got anything to do with personal responsibility in this sense.
#109582 to #109580 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Well sure, I understand that.

And well things like personal responsibility was a cornerstone of classical conservatism, that's why I mentioned it. But yes it wouldn't be an inherently conservative trait.
#109584 to #109582 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
What I mean is in this sense, taking responsibility and for ones finances and ones health aren't ideologically linked. Since this paper is coming from an evo-psych perspective I would have to guess the authors are thinking in terms of survival strategies early man used. Stronger men felt more confident being more independent, weaker men felt more secure operating as a group and pooling resources.
#109589 to #109584 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
I can agree with that.
#109640 to #109589 - theism
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Evo psych has some major weaknesses but I wonder if these statistics can be demonstrated on a larger scale.
#109528 to #109523 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
And then they say it's the right that denies science...
#109541 to #109528 - valeriya
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
Evolutionary psychology is hardly a science, it's a science in the same way sociology is a science.
#109576 to #109541 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(03/10/2016) [-]
Physical strength is hardly a psychological thing...
#109615 to #109576 - valeriya
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
It isn't but that's what the paper is considering it as.
#109526 to #109523 - pebar
Reply +2
(03/09/2016) [-]
people with personal discipline are more likely to think personal discipline is a good trait to have
#109527 to #109526 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Yeah, that's kind of the point. And physically fit makes usually fall into a certain psychological niche that better identifies with individualism over collectivism anyways. So being more right leaning makes sense in that regard .
#109525 to #109523 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
HAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAHAHAH
#109520 - kanadetenshi
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Muh Bernie Bros.

#109530 to #109520 - anon
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Muh Bernie Bros.
#109522 to #109520 - anon
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
I always found that meme funny.

Apparently Clinton supporters forget the "PUMAs". The cunts who started the birther meme in the first place.
#109518 - anon
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Ideology military training cruelty ISIS uses Nazi methods to breed young fighters  report
#109572 to #109518 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/10/2016) [-]
>ISIS utilized children purely as military assets from the beginning
>all Germany did for the majority of the war was federally organize and invest in the upbringing of the German youth
>the German military didn't use children as anything more than voluntary trainees until the most desperate part of the war
Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's the evil Nazis. If this is really the better outcome we're living in, why do so many people have to lie to themselves to justify it?
#109467 - anon
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Is yourgaylol really a gay sailor?
#109519 to #109467 - anon
Reply -2
(03/09/2016) [-]
Judge for yourself.
#109464 - anon
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Trump 2016~
#109473 to #109464 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Someone doesn't seem to understand what a BUMPER sticker is.
#109469 to #109464 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
The "no whining" sticker just ties it together.
#109460 - mixednuts
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#109456 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
I'm listening to Hayek's Road to Serfdom on audible.
In it he talks about how the marxist communists were very easily converted to nazism, and the nazi proaganda industry knew it

feelythefeel, it made me think of you
#109535 to #109456 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Is that an insult, or an observation?
#109536 to #109535 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
an observation

since you were a leftists a while back
#109537 to #109536 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
It wasn't easy, and it didn't happen overnight either.
#109475 to #109456 - marinepenguin
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Good read. I want to go through it again.
#109470 to #109456 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
What does he contribute it to? In practice most Marxist recruits were only in it for the nationalism so it makes sense that they'd prefer an ideology obsessed with it instead of one that uses nations for convenience.
#109466 to #109456 - anon
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
So hes a sheep.
#109461 to #109456 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Pretty dope book.
#109450 - feelythefeel
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
/Bernie+2k16/funny-pictures/5851713/276#276
>tfw someone's so stupid that you can't convince them of anything
>tfw this somehow means they "win".
#109477 to #109450 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
theism thinks you're wrong, that probably means you're right
#109501 to #109477 - theism
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
You should consider replying to the comment at the start of the chain. It makes things more readable.
#109502 to #109501 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Why would you use your brain so early in the year?

You know you're only capable of doing that once every 12 months.
#109503 to #109502 - theism
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
You know it's normally fun to entertain mongoloids but today I'm not feeling it today so I'm going to leave you to shout at the wall.
#109504 to #109503 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Well, I'm at least glad you found a place amongst your own kind.

Even mongoloids need a jester.

#109505 to #109504 - theism
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
See, you have like 3 jokes. It's just not fun when you suck at this.
#109506 to #109505 - youregaylol
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Counting is hard for you I guess.

Still it's interesting that you admit it only takes three jokes to get you to keep replying.

You must be a very insecure person. I suggest a weight loss program.
#109507 to #109506 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Honestly you're really boring. It would be one thing if you went full retarded but you only half try. You're just not very interesting.
#109508 to #109507 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
I might take that more seriously if this wasn't your second reply after announcing you're going to leave. Obviously I'm the most interesting thing in your life at this moment, I wouldn't be surprised if you were in love with me.

I'll have to turn you down though, our relationship is strictly man with stick (me) poking retard (you).
#109509 to #109508 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109510 to #109509 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Ah, i guess I triggered you.

I'll put a warning next time.
#109511 to #109510 - theism
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109512 to #109511 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
4th reply.

You'd think you'd have some follow through with at least something in your life.

At this point you're not even saying anything, is it really that hard to stay away from me?

I guess the average will always hover towards their betters.
#109513 to #109512 - theism
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109514 to #109513 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
5th reply.

This is getting sad.

Replay again if you'd like me stop bullying you.
#109515 to #109514 - theism
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109516 to #109515 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
Understood. I'm sorry for upsetting you, I was just fooling, heh.

This will be my last reply, I'll let you have the last comment as I know its important to you.

GG buddy.
#109517 to #109516 - theism
Reply -1
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109531 to #109517 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
>spamming this board

Do it in /religion/, this is my sacred home.
#109532 to #109531 - theism
0
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109480 to #109477 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
#109481 to #109480 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
I know you may get the two mixed up at times, but that isn't being applied to an anus, thats a head.
#109482 to #109481 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
In your case you should get both.
#109483 to #109482 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Thanks for my insult, I almost forgot I said it 41 seconds ago.
#109484 to #109483 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
yfw
#109485 to #109484 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Is this your way of telling me you don't have a comeback?

I'd prefer it if you'd just apologize for challenging me and sulk away tbh fam.
#109486 to #109485 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
You should consider a head reduction.
#109487 to #109486 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
I'm not sure the tiny cranium society is for me, thanks for the offer though.
#109488 to #109487 - theism
Reply +1
(03/09/2016) [-]
You should really re-evaluate your self esteem. Most people underestimate themselves but you have a relatively strange condition.
#109489 to #109488 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
I greatly underestimate myself, thats why I waste energy mocking you on FJ.
#109490 to #109489 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Then go away.
#109491 to #109490 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Can't, I have a morbid obsession with out banting betas until they cry.

It's comparable to crack but less expensive.
#109492 to #109491 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
I bet that makes you very happy.
#109493 to #109492 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
More like casual amusement.

You're not an A list zoo animal like a lion, you're like a chimp peeing in its mouth.

It's fun in small bursts but after a bit you just feel disgusted.
#109494 to #109493 - theism
Reply +2
(03/09/2016) [-]
A nice glass of bleach will get that disgusting feeling out.
#109496 to #109494 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Good idea.

Mix it with the piss this time monkey, that will lighten things up.
#109497 to #109496 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Piss will dilute the cleansing power. You really want to take the hurt away don't you?
#109500 to #109497 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
It's nice that you researched the middle school schedule, once you get in there you'll be a big boy.
#109498 to #109497 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Honestly I am indifferent to your pain.

Now be a good BoBo and drink up.

Or at least do a flip or something.

Tell me about your childhood. What traumatic event created you.
#109499 to #109498 - theism
0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Shouldn't you be in class? Middle school starts around 8.
#109476 to #109450 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
you complain about memes and the thing that started that thread was you calling out a meme
#109478 to #109476 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
How do those two things contradict.

Calling out a meme is consistent with complaining about memes, yes?
#109479 to #109478 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Bernie bern down the economy Sanders saying it's 2016 and there's still poverty is saying that something should have been done long ago. It's common rhetoric for leftists.

Feely going "IT'S THE CURRENT YEAR" is a meme
it's a good meme but it's still a meme
#109495 to #109479 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Isn't "It's 2016" a meme on it's own? I mean even if it's common rhetoric it's still a meme right?
#109472 to #109450 - theism
Reply 0
(03/09/2016) [-]
Yeah I think you're wrong here.