Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (4): marinepenguin, theism, thereasonableperso, youregaylol, anonymous(37).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#110497 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
How's the election, Ameribros?
#110501 to #110497 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
GIF
hell
#110499 to #110497 - Sunset
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
Trump is a weiner
#110498 to #110497 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
Trump and Clinton are both dominating. Kasich won Ohio. Nothing surprising.
#110494 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
I'm worried that Cruz will overtake Trump in Missouri. His lead is dwindling.
I'm worried that Cruz will overtake Trump in Missouri. His lead is dwindling.
#110495 to #110494 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
It opened back up a little. It always makes me nervous to see it work like that.
#110496 to #110495 - aceofshadows ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
That's good.
#110491 - Sunset
Reply +3
(03/16/2016) [-]
B T F O
T
F
O
#110489 - canyou
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
Fucking thank God Kasich won Ohio. I want this shit show to go to a convention even if they pick Trump. That means the vote needs to get split up as much as possible.

I just want to see some pants-shitting terror and hair pulling tbh fam
#110548 to #110489 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
Definitely, for the entertainment!
#110490 to #110489 - Sunset
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
you really don't like trump huh
#110521 to #110490 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
Not anymore I don't
#110485 - Sunset
Reply +3
(03/16/2016) [-]
PRESS F TO PAY RESPECTS

IT'S ANUDDA SHOAH
#110481 - Elk
Reply +6
(03/16/2016) [-]
Rubio dropped out.
#110545 to #110481 - asotil
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
Missile defense time
#110480 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
why didnt Bloomberg originally run

he wouldve been easily the best candidate out of both parties
#110486 to #110480 - Sunset
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
i'm not a yorker

who the fuck is bloomberg
#110487 to #110486 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
was the mayor of NYC for 12 years

was really popular for both parties
#110488 to #110487 - Sunset
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
o cool
#110483 to #110480 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
because he knew he would split the democrat vote and either Trump or Cruz would win and he didn't want either
#110484 to #110483 - PopcornViking
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
i mean to try to win the democratic nomination outright

not run as an independent
which is what he would never do now because of what you said
#110478 - pebar
Reply +2
(03/16/2016) [-]
>rubio
#110477 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
>press proclaims that free speech doesn't protect Trump
>press proclaims that free speech will protect them against Trump
#110479 to #110477 - anon
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
muh media boogeyman
#110473 - unforgivensoul
Reply +3
(03/15/2016) [-]
Just in

Kasich winning Ohio, no surprise there.
#110469 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
29% reporting in on CNN

TRUMP HAD 45% IN FLORIDA

CANT STUMP
A
N
T

S
T
U
M
P
#110493 to #110469 - eight
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
Such a fucking shame.
#110471 to #110469 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
This sucks. I was really hoping for a convention.
#110465 - pebar
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Ep 89  No You Wont Be Able To Control Donald Trump Audio next episode
#110470 to #110465 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
I prefer to listen to these while I'm at work. Listening to politics on my off time is stressful recently.
#110468 to #110465 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
You can actually get it straight from dailywire when it comes out.
www.dailywire.com/podcasts/4139/ep-39-no-you-wont-be-able-control-donald-trump-ben-shapiro
#110455 - Elk
Reply -3
(03/15/2016) [-]
>blocked by redangreen
>get on alternate account to roast him some more
>only friends can send him messages

Why is life so cruel?
#110459 to #110455 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Guys sop thumbing this man down, he is one of us.

redandgreen is a cancer to intellectual discussions and is thus a cancer to this board.
#110492 to #110459 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
who is that?
#110502 to #110492 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
Can't corner the dorner
#110503 to #110502 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
No, I mean redandgreen
#110504 to #110503 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
A really annoying Irish dyke.
#110472 to #110459 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
Just because someone shares some of your political views doesn't mean they're free of criticism. If anything I'd criticise them more.
#110474 to #110472 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Yeah but he's cool.
#110476 to #110474 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
I have no strong feelings about him one way or the other.
#110475 to #110474 - akkere
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
"This shitposter is better than the other shitposter just because"
I remember posting about how stuff like this was going to eventually lead to Facepunch-tier crock and you saying how it wasn't going to lead to this shit then, too.
#110464 to #110459 - pebar
Reply +4
(03/15/2016) [-]
elk is worse
#110467 to #110464 - Elk
Reply -3
(03/15/2016) [-]
You're just mad because I don't stroke your metaphorical wiener over your stupid opinions.
#110466 to #110464 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Than redandgreen? LOLNO
#110458 to #110455 - thereasonableperso
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#110461 to #110458 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
Pls stop.
#110462 to #110461 - thereasonableperso ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Sorry did I break some unspoken rule? Cause all I see are two users being stupid. Of course political discussions are fine they just seem like they have personal beef.
#110463 to #110462 - unforgivensoul
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
Yeah but we are on the right side though.
#110460 to #110458 - Elk
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Ooooh, that was why I blocked you. You're a big freakin' crybaby.
#110452 - Elk
Reply +3
(03/15/2016) [-]
It turns out that I won Ohio.
#110456 to #110452 - canyou
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
Kasich is that you??
#110448 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
We Must Fight  President Reagan Tyler Summers Version

Posted the wrong damn video earlier.
#110446 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35814215

Make all schools in the UK Academies!

Except the Chief Inspector of Schools found standards had fallen in Academy schools and found that they were wasting public money.
The Conservatives are going to do it anyway.... maybe because some of them have friends in the education business?
Why do English people vote for them? It's like Turkeys voting for Christmas!

It's also cheaper at the moment for the government to borrow money for things like building schools directly but instead it's going in to private finance initiative deals with banks who will get part of any return .... which costs tax payers more!
It's almost as if they have friends in the banks too!
#110449 to #110446 - anon
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
nobodies cares you cunt
#110407 - canyou
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
RUBIO!
RUBIO!
RU-BI-O!
will probably lose
#110408 to #110407 - canyou
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Actually I don't know. It's very possible Kasich and Rubio both win their home states tonight. That would make this election VERY interesting
#110410 to #110408 - Zaxplab
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
If they didn't win their respective home states, it would be very sad.
#110405 - alimais
Reply +2
(03/15/2016) [-]
The Great Debate
Why — and how — Russia won in Syria


Vladi is a master ruse man

blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/15/why-and-how-russia-won-in-syria/?utm_source=Facebook
#110423 to #110405 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Right. They pulled out because they're incapable of conducting multiple military operations, hence why East Ukraine is calmer and way fewer Russian planes doing shenanigans in the Baltic Sea.
#110425 to #110423 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
What would Russia get/gain from Ukraine? Is there anything useful left?

Also why'd Syrian operations influence old Soviet Bombers flying around in the Baltic Sea?
#110428 to #110425 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Because it's expensive. And they have cut down drastically down on fighter jet sorties for the past 8 months. Before the Syrian intervention there were practically incidence every week in the Baltic Sea since October.
We both know what they want in Ukraine, which is a weak Ukraine working as buffer zone to NATO, a Ukraine with weak economic ties to the EU.
#110430 to #110428 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
They take the money for the Syrian op from the training budget, Russia's military is pretty much focused on cost efficiency

www.ibtimes.com/amid-airstrikes-syria-us-officials-admire-russias-cost-effective-military-campaign-2241363

Ukraine has nothing of value left after Crimea got annexed/rejoined Russia and the presence of the separatists fighting or not keeps NATO away while the corruption and poorness keeps the EU away
#110432 to #110430 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
$ 3 billion is a lot for an already pressured Russian economy. As the source state, it's taken from the annual military budget, meaning that the campaign in Eastern Ukraine and sorties in the Baltic Sea both have been drained.

>Ukraine has nothing of value left after Crimea got annexed/rejoined Russia
That's not what the Russian government is saying, and it's certainly not how it's acting.
The EU is interested in strengthening ties with Ukraine, it's Russia who's keeping them away. May I remind you why the Ukrainian people revolted?
#110441 to #110432 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Well it depends on what period of time you are spending that money.

When it comes to Ukraine I like the videos of this former US soldier
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-NzhHv6AAo
#110442 to #110441 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Right Sector has few members compared to Ukraine's total population and only received 1,8% votes nation-wide in the 2014 parliamentary elections. Them having any real influence is just a narrative of the pro-russian medias.
#110444 to #110442 - alimais
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
You don't need many people to terrorize a country and BBC is surely not a pro-russian media outlet

www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bbc+right+sector

Also Right Sector is not the only group like that there.
#110429 to #110428 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
*Before the Syrian intervention there were practically incidence every week in the Baltic Sea, since October there has been practically none.
#110433 to #110429 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Some[!] of those are only incidents because NATO has to scramble jets for security reasons if they fly military planes between Kaliningrad let's not forget about the position of good ol Kaliningrad and the rest of Russia through the Baltic Sea.
#110434 to #110433 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
If they are only flying between Russia and Kaliningrad, why have they invaded Scandinavian airspace multiple times with their transponders off? As long as they stay out of sovereign air space they can do all the flying they want to imo.
#110436 to #110434 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
I even added "[!]" after saying "Some of those" also it's not that hard to get into Scandinavian air space be it a accident or provocation.
#110440 to #110436 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Red dots mark some incursions I know of.
#110412 to #110405 - vladi
Reply -1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Also, nice read, thanks for posting.
#110414 to #110412 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Now thanks to the ceasefire and peacetalks the intervention of Russia made possible, ISIS is being attacked on many fronts and are practically helpless against those attacks

syria.liveuamap.com/en/time/14.03.2016

#110416 to #110414 - vladi
Reply -1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Even more so then now. Really it all started turning (slowly) for them since Kobane. Truly it was their Stalingrad.
#110420 to #110416 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
It's a geopolitical win, showcase of some of their arsenal and caused butthurt on the mainstream media which thought they had figured out the narrative with russia (i.e. russia aggressive, russia wants control over syria, russia will only hurt itself, etc.) then putin pulls out and media is dumbfounded. the narratives they have prepared have become inapplicable.
#110422 to #110420 - vladi
Reply -1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Yes, I too think that's one of the motives. And besides, it helps the ceasefire, which they helped achieve. Thus putting them in a positive light that way too.
#110431 to #110422 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
There are always those Syrian General threads if you take up interest in following conflicts which is somehow quite interesting like watching a tabletop game .

shekelnator is also present ther

You need to login to view this link
#110435 to #110431 - vladi
Reply -1
(03/15/2016) [-]
Thanks man, that seems like a really nice thread thing. But how do I keep up with it? Go on /pol/ every day and look for it?

So far I've only been looking at the live map, which is very informative by itself, and before that the (not so complete) timeline at wikipedia.
#110438 to #110435 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
How to keep up :
> You need to login to view this link
> Press "F3" or spot it right away
>enter "Syria" or "SG"

It's there everyday since I last year, traffic depends on how much is happening
#110439 to #110438 - vladi
Reply -1
(03/15/2016) [-]
YESH THAT THE FOOKING GOOD STUV MANG
#110451 to #110439 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
If there's a big and rapid offensive going on than it easily hits 300 posts a hour.

>pic related, it was the best time on /sg/ when the Aleppo offensive went off to connect two pockets
#110505 to #110451 - vladi
Reply 0
(03/16/2016) [-]
I remember that. It was epic seeing the change on the live map.
#110515 to #110505 - alimais
Reply +1
(03/16/2016) [-]
#110450 to #110439 - alimais
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#110409 to #110405 - vladi
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Yep, and by intervening in Syria, they didn't only make their ally stronger, they've put themselves on the international stage again, after being isolated somewhat over the Crimea annexation. Smart move, smart.
#110383 - pebar
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
should I buy a wall street journal subscription?
#110417 to #110383 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/15/2016) [-]
If you're interested in investing, sure.
#110415 to #110383 - akkere
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
I've subbed to them on and off over the years. The main perk is the discounts they offer for different books.
You'd probably be more interested in The Economist though, especially because they have an audio-version of their weekly editions (basing this interest on your previous inquiries regarding Amazon's Audible).
www.economist.com/audio-edition
Here's a sample of what you might expect to listen to; not terribly recent, but much of the information in this never gets to any other news source because it's only tangentially related at most to more mainstream events.
www.demonoid.pw/files/details/3331358/008007401664/
Most of these audio logs are very in-depth
#110385 to #110383 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/15/2016) [-]
Whatever floats your boat.