Upload
Login or register
Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Online User List [+] Online: (5): akkere, lotengo, marinepenguin, theism, whoozy, anonymous(8).
asd
#116999 - economicfreedom
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>If you don't agree with me, you're an anarchist
#117003 to #116999 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>implying there's anything wrong with that
#117017 to #117003 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
That's just bullshit, Trump obviously will play the game to get elected, say things he may not mean. But there are obviously his true beliefs that he espouses too.
#116998 - pebar
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
If there's anything that would make me vote Trump, it's leftists talking favorably about socialism
#117009 to #116998 - anon
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Socialism without niggers is the only socialism that works.
#117004 to #116998 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Cenk uger's smug ass face is what did it for me.
#117002 to #116998 - Shiny
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Trump would espouse Stalinism if it would make him popular.
#116995 - anon
Reply +2
(05/24/2016) [-]
>Donald Trump believes that Bill Clinton is a rapist
>Invites him to his wedding anyways.
#116967 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
One of my favorite YouTube channels Charisma on Command just made a video called "Why Trump will SMASH Hillary". He focuses on how people respond to other people's charisma, body language, etc. I'm dying to watch it but I'm at my job orientation.
#116991 to #116967 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
People don't, I hope, vote based solely on charisma though. It obviously helps if you can sell your ideas and charisma is part of that but policies are important.

Trump's policies on immigration will probably be a hard sell to most Democrats just as his views on trade will be to many Republicans, whether he's charismatic or not.
#116993 to #116991 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The content creator suggested that Hillary would be a much stronger opponent if instead of trying to prove she's a even more of a political outsider than Trump (Ha!), she'd just say that him being an outsider is dangerous and not a good quality for presidency. He then went on to bet $1,000 on Trump to win the nomination even though he won't vote for him.

It's Trump's game, Hillary's just dumb enough to play it.
#116994 to #116993 - theism
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
The whole "political oursider" argument is just stupid anyways.
#117005 to #116994 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah. People just assume all politicians are crooked.
#117006 to #117005 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Because it's easier to group everybody together
#116970 to #116967 - akkere ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
Most people have read the headline that goes something like "Statistical model predicts 97% chance of Trump winning" or something along those lines, but one thing people overlook was the actual set of factors the model runs on. The professor who made the model figured that success in a presidential campaign correlates directly to success in primaries (and, if I remember correctly, general debates). Though I'm rather curious how one would be able to quantify a success for cases where both candidates are considerably matched in charisma or lack thereof (2012 for example saw debates that didn't really go anywhere as far as I can recall), you wouldn't need to look into deep psychological aspects to see Trump would likely conquer under these circumstances.
#116968 to #116967 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
I was literally watching it in the background while I read this. Great minds think a like
#116964 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
www.rt.com/news/344020-far-right-austria-president/

Could this mark the beginning of the rising ring wing in Europe?
#116996 to #116964 - Shiny
Reply +1
(05/24/2016) [-]
Seeing as fascism is the least efficient form of government ever devised, I kind of hope there is no compromise so it burns out in a decade.
#117001 to #116996 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
I don't think it'll be a form of Fascism if the right starts gaining power.
#116975 to #116964 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
He didn't win though.
#117000 to #116975 - alimais ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
But there may be new election because a mayor rigged the election in his town and a town with +9000 people had +13 000 voters
#116965 to #116964 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Lmao no. Some votes will happen to be inlegit so a new election will be held and surprise surprise the left win again
#116963 - anon
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Alerta Alerta Antifascista Van Der Bellen is now President of Austria.
#116972 to #116963 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
*Hofer
#116978 to #116972 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Hofer lost though.
#116992 to #116978 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
rigged
#116955 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I really wish the US had been nicer to South America throughout history. That would be cool if we could get all them as states.
#117011 to #116955 - seniorawesomesauce
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Didn't we make a claim saying "If you fuck with south American countries, you have to fuck with us" even though we were a minor power across the ocean from the REAL superpowers? That seems pretty nice to me.

Also TFW no Knights of the Golden Circle, no successful "republic of lower california", no successful annexation of nicaragua
#117042 to #117011 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
Yeah, but the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary also allowed us to just fuck with them for not upholding our interests. I wish it was more "Keep Europe out," and less "Keep America in."

I just think that America could make all the South American exporting countries even better if they were states.
#116971 to #116955 - theplanetearth
Reply -3
(05/23/2016) [-]
Too many shitskins.
#116997 to #116971 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/24/2016) [-]
>go to brown people land
>why are there so many brown people
>fucking cultural marxism
#116959 to #116955 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
>when people say US involvement with foreign regimes is a conspiracy theory
#116957 to #116955 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
then we'd share a same currency and thus directly share a lot of economic problems

keep all their problems south of the border, thanks
#116958 to #116957 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Thay could only benefit. It's not like them have anything on us.
#116969 to #116958 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Wtf are you talking about. Did the Eurozone and the EU not teach you anything?
#116951 - anon
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
#116960 to #116951 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I'm sure they'd be happy to let it sink in.
#116954 to #116951 - whitechino
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Once the problems occur, they'll switch it back to two bathrooms.
#116941 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
www.bbc.co.uk/news/video_and_audio/headlines/36354520

I don't know how they'd do it but I hope if the UK does decide to leave the EU that they don't put the border controls in.
#116948 to #116941 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Why not?
#116979 to #116948 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Because in Ireland it'll be a nightmare. There are roads which cross the border several times along their length.
If they do it then I hope they have an exception for Ireland and keep the open border.
#116946 to #116941 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
There are good reasons to leave the EU, but if their choice is "or else the niggies will rape us" they probably have no real plan laid out.
#116980 to #116946 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Both campaigns have been focused on fear which they haven't really explained or statistics and claims which have been refuted to some extent by the press. Nobody I know think much of the campaigns and politicians involved regardless of their opinion on staying or going!
#116940 - mixednuts
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Insiders explains the concept of a dank meme So, has anyone else been keeping up with the Australian federal election?
#116973 to #116940 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/23/2016) [-]
Jesus christ...I want more.
#116933 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
oh shit
#116962 to #116933 - anon
Reply +2
(05/23/2016) [-]
Trump & Clinton.
#116949 to #116933 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara deshi deshi basara basara
#116942 to #116933 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
It begins.
#116943 to #116942 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
It's still months away. Any poll is meaningless this far out.
#116945 to #116943 - kanadetenshi
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
This sudden rise in the polls makes sense though, during the primaries he didn't focus on Hillary but after Cruz and Kasich dropped he went on the offensive and we've seen only his polls rising since then.
#116981 to #116945 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
It may do but it's still meaningless this far out.
#116952 to #116945 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
You're forgetting Bernie bros haven't committed to Hillary yet.
#116953 to #116952 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I don't think many will.
#116982 to #116953 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I think in the end they'll settle for Clinton as the lesser of two evils in terms of their beliefs.
#116983 to #116982 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
From my personal experiences, Bernie supporters at least consider Trump a political outsider and while they despise him, he's better than Clinton. At least that's what I've gauged from the couple dozen supporters I know personally. They seem to either concede to trump, or they'll write Bernie in as third party.
#116985 to #116983 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
I'm surprised by that, Clinton is closer to Bernie on most issues.
#116987 to #116985 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
It seems that they think she's only taking those positions because Bernie has gained such massive and loyal attention from his views. They think she's a fraud and very little could change that opinion of her.

I've even seen things like "right wing Hillary" on Facebook, which is pretty ridiculous. But shows just how much some people on the left dislike her.

But many devoted Cruz supporters are considering voting Hillary because they find Trump as such a danger to US politics.

This election is gonna be fucky.
#116988 to #116987 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
The Primaries have been crazy! There's probably lots more crazy to come
#116956 to #116953 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
That's what they said about Cruz supporters
#116935 to #116933 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
RIP shillary
#116918 - anon
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I would gladly be the Adolf Hitler of Sweden, I just don't know how to pull it off
#116966 to #116918 - enlightednatzie
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
Hell seger min vän! Dont listen to the thumbawumptrump supporter, he hasnt any ideah what he is speaking about. Like usual.
#116925 to #116918 - thumbfortrump
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Shoot yourself.
#116932 to #116925 - anon
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Not until my work is done.
#116915 - anon
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
#116924 to #116915 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
He's good lookin
#116914 - anon
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
SAY IT WITH ME NOW

HELLO, PRESIDENT TRUMP
#116950 to #116914 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/23/2016) [-]
HELLO, PRESIDENT TRUMP
#116931 to #116914 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
HELLO, PRESIDENT TRUMP
#116896 - economicfreedom
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
the anarchist in me is so tempting
IDK if I can keep rationalizing government
#116920 to #116896 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
anarchism is equally as retarded as communism, if not more.
#116923 to #116920 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
TBH I would argue communism is worse than anarchism
#116930 to #116923 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
Think of it this way, communism is a horribly flawed idea but at least its an attempt at structuring a system hell maybe in the far far future it is realistic, who knows . Anarchism doesn't even attempt to create a system. Or what it does is create a system and yet pretend like its not government but the "community". They are really retarded people.
#116912 to #116896 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
GIF
#116916 to #116912 - economicfreedom
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I thought the pic gave it away that I still acknowledge the rational reasons for government
#116855 - anon
Reply +1
(05/22/2016) [-]
#116936 to #116855 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
#116937 to #116936 - drastronomy
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
#116851 - lotengo
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
Milo and Ben are going one on one
Milo's Tweet: twitter.com/Nero/status/733700971226894340
Ben's Response: twitter.com/benshapiro/status/733703202462302209
Milo Accepts: twitter.com/Nero/status/733703381068468224
Rubin confirms: twitter.com/RubinReport/status/733776218592419840

Who do you think will win this one?
Tho I agree with Milo's stance, Ben wil beat him in the debate
#116938 to #116851 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
Milo's strength seems to lie in defeating social justice liberalism/feminism, I love the guy, but I've never once seen Shapiro be in a debate that he lost. He's so unwavering and confident in his position that you can't fight him. I don't think Milos banter and the fact that he's a homosexual will lend him the same advantages as when fighting the PC crowd.
#116913 to #116851 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
Ben will sweep the floor with Milo.
#116934 to #116913 - lotengo
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I'm afraid he will.
But Milo must realise this, why would he ask for this? Does he have an angle to play?
#116863 to #116851 - Shiny
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
Shapiro is kind of a twerp, but he's an alright guy. Hope he stomps Yiannopolous.
#116921 to #116863 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
The thing about Shapiro is whether you agree with him on anything or not, you can at least respect the fact that he is unequivocally, unapologetically principled in his beliefs.
#116861 to #116851 - youregaylol
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
alright but what date tho
#116859 to #116851 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I'm kind hyped for this one actually
#116857 to #116851 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
from an ideological standpoint, Milo is more of a minarchist
the reason he supports Trump is that he like chaos and he thinks Trump will fuck up washington

Milo acknowledges that some of Trumps policies are bad, so I'm not sure this debate will focus too much on policy
#116922 to #116857 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
This debate will be Ben destroying Milo's points and Milo's attempt to keep shifting the goalpost to a point where its "just a matter of opinion". I like Milo, but this is the only strategy he really has against Ben.
#116854 to #116851 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
Ben may not be perfect, but he will UTTERLY ANNIHILATE ANYONE in a debate. He will systematically destroy every single premise of Milo's. Ben is like the Jewish Rocky of debating.
#116853 to #116851 - canyou
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
Ben is a better debater, but he has more to lose. Crowder is probably pissed though, cause he's bl been trying to get them on his show to debate for weeks.
#116860 to #116853 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
I think Crowder would be biased though since he agrees with Ben.
Rubin is a leftist but it seems like he's starting to see the light
#116847 - theplanetearth
Reply -1
(05/21/2016) [-]
Oy vey. They goyim are talking shit about us on the internet! Shut it down!
If anyone has a copy of that webm of the girl from Schindler's list I need it. Not the bullshit one in the red coat. The girl throwing shit at the Jews screaming "Goodbye Jews!"
#116849 to #116847 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
I'd rather be Holocausted because of massive anti-semetic uprisings caused by the internet then to censor free speech on it. Fuck off JIDF.
I'd rather be Holocausted because of massive anti-semetic uprisings caused by the internet then to censor free speech on it. Fuck off JIDF.
#116850 to #116849 - theplanetearth
Reply +1
(05/21/2016) [-]
Jesus man. If it wasn't for the fact I knew better I'd think you weren't actually a merchant.
#116845 - marinepenguin ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
NRA just endorsed Trump yesterday.
#116846 to #116845 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
relative to hillary, I'm not surprised
#116837 - thereasonableperso ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
Should we shred the Consitution and have a modern Consitutional convention made up of the 50 states write a new one?

I say this not because the Constitution is flawed, but because it has been manipulated. Over the years the government has put many laws in place that circumvent the amendments. So many officials defend keeping the constitution as is because they have loop-holed and manipulated it in their favor. If the constitution were to completely change, they would lose their loopholes.

Thoughts?
#116848 to #116837 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
repeal the commerce clause and you'll fix 99% of the problems
#116856 to #116848 - figatron
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
It was the Supreme Court who fucked up the Commerce clause, not the Framers. The Commerce clause is fine in its original context
#116858 to #116856 - pebar
Reply 0
(05/22/2016) [-]
if you grow your own wheat for your own consumption, then you don't demand other peoples wheat,
thus it affects interstate commerce and the government can ban you from growing your own garden
(according to the supreme court)

but they're right. I don't think the framers understood how interconnected the economy makes us. The field of modern economics was just barely getting started
#116841 to #116837 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
Are you looking for something that's more like a state constitution, which makes absolutely sure that each amendment can only be interpreted one way?
#116842 to #116841 - thereasonableperso ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
Not necessarily but yes.
#116843 to #116842 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
I think it works fine as it is now. The Federal one grants power while state ones limit power.
#116839 to #116837 - figatron
Reply 0
(05/21/2016) [-]
Problem is, it is still vastly superior to anything any modern political party or leader could come up with today.