Upload
Login or register
Highest Rated Newest
auto-refresh every 1 2 3 5 seconds
Latest users (2): braus, PopcornViking, anonymous(2).
Anonymous comments allowed.
#111380 - alimais ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111377 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
>le Republicans are establishment stooges/authoritarians/etc meme
>both parties have a choice between a party establishment candidate and an anti-party establishment candidate
>Republicans are flocking to Trump because the establishment of both parties has been fucking them up the ass for years now
>Democrats flock to Hillary because they have no reason to betray the establishment that has allowed them to grow into spoiled, complacent children
>they even consider it a moral obligation to support Hillary (If you don't for Hillary, you're a racist, sexist cis-shet bigot, etc etc)

As long as we're raging against the boss man or whatever, if it walks like a stooge and talks like a stooge...
#111388 to #111377 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
The polls show the split between Sanders and Clinton is pretty heavy and most of Clinton's votes are coming through super delegates.
#111376 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
The Tay debacle seems to prove that, at least amoung the internet community, social marxism is far less popular than the establishment would have you believe. The Fash trend is growing so popular that it can transform an AI based on public digital information into an ultra-nationalist in a matter of hours.
#111375 - feelythefeel
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#111370 - joshlol
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
official Sweden twitter account (as run by a new swede every week)

twitter.com/search?q=%22I%27m%20the%20immigrant%22%20from%3Asweden&src=typd

I like this guy, he will cause a lot of butthurt
#111372 to #111370 - feelythefeel
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
The best part is the backlash. About a year ago this would've come and gone without a word.
#111365 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
This is considered brilliant satire in 2016.

I forgot a word.
#111386 to #111365 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
That's actually pretty good satire because it took me a solid 5 seconds of reading to understand its sarcastic.
#111367 to #111365 - anon
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
you can tell the satire is effective when it triggers a leftist to start a thread about how it made them butthurt

ie right now
#111369 to #111367 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Also that would be eg. Eg is for examples i.e is for explanation.
#111368 to #111367 - theism
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
"You responded so obviously I win"
#111373 to #111368 - anon
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
But you're not responding to anyone, you started your own thread because a satirical picture triggered you.
#111374 to #111373 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I started a thread because some retard put the time into making that and I find that amusing. You maintain that I'm butthurt but I could easily accuse you of being butthurt for responding to me.
#111378 to #111374 - anon
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Ya, you seem like you're having a laugh riot. Totally.
#111379 to #111378 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
k m8, you can think however you like.
#111364 - theism
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#111359 - alimais
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#111358 to #111353 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
No shit Sherlock.
#111352 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I come baring gifts from the East
#111360 to #111352 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I prefer the terrorist one since it's more comparable to the US mass shooting
neither of which happen that often

rapes happen all the time
#111366 to #111360 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
That's the joke
#111347 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
“If you want to be punk these days, you want to be cool and dissident and mischievous, you have to be conservative,” Yiannopoulos said.

I'm not sure I like the idea of reducing ideology down to a passing trend
#111355 to #111347 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
He's pointing out that leftist ideology, which prides itself on being a movement of populist counter culture, is actually mainstream and has been in power for several years.

It is no longer "rebellious" to walk around half naked in a gay parade, it's expected and even applauded in many cases.

Saying "fug da police" is as common and ordinary as dyed hair.

The individuals are all alike, and when the rebels become the establishment, they lose their revolutionary flare.

In that sense, red pill ideology is the true insurgency.
#111357 to #111355 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
ARE YOU LITERALLY KIDDING ME?????

AMERICA IS CENTER RIGHT YOU FASCIST !!111111
#111349 to #111347 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Milo shouldn't be taken to seriously. A lot of what he says is unfiltered id, kinda like Trump.
#111346 - youregaylol
Reply +2
(03/24/2016) [-]
le funny glasses man
#111336 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
i want to know about something lot of Syrians standing against such thing called Federalization of Syria

What is Federalization? is it bad? why?
#111344 to #111336 - valeriya
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Federalization is essentially decentralizing power and creating another level of government closer to a group or area.

So in the example of Syria, instead of having an Alawite elite rule over all syrians you'd decentralize it probably religious and ethnic lines, So you'd give the kurds a degree of autonomy, you'd give the druze their autonomy, it's the easiest way to control a diverse and divided nation, an alternative to the country breaking apart into smaller states, problem with it is 99.9% of the time either the recently empowered local governments aren't satisfied, or the central government isn't happy giving up power.
#111345 to #111344 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
what. NO. this must not happen or we will end up being like Saudi Arabia. fuck no. if this is US plan B then they better keep dreaming about it and fuck off from syria. or we will make sure this is their last attempt in their life trying to fuck up a country.

do you know how many people will die because of this? do you know how many damage it will cause that will create a real ethnic genocides?
#111318 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Karadžić got his verdict today in Haag, thoughts?
#111348 to #111318 - schnizel
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Good night serv pride.
#111329 to #111318 - thumbfortrump
Reply +2
(03/24/2016) [-]
Genocide is never justifiable, so I agree with the ICC's ruling.
#111332 to #111329 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Me too. He should never be released.
#111320 to #111318 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
who?
#111322 to #111320 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
... Radovan Karadžić?
#111335 to #111322 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
pebar is especially American lol
#111339 to #111335 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111340 to #111339 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]


This is what cognosceteipsum is talking about

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35893804
#111342 to #111340 - pebar ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
yes, I googled the name as soon as he posted. My "who" post was my indifference to the suffering that goes on in the wasteland of Southeast Europe

a while back when schnizel was on the board, he commented a lot of how to make his country great, and I kept saying they way to have a great country is to not blow up your own infrastructure
#111343 to #111342 - redandgreen
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Oh, sorry.

I'm not indifferent to the suffering but yes they seem to have a lot of conflicts
#111337 to #111335 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Noted.
#111323 to #111322 - shekelnator
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
is this Finngol?
#111327 to #111323 - anon
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
what?
Btw you blocked me
#111310 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
There seems to have been a lot of information in other member states about the Brussels attackers which the Belgian police didn't have. Should there be European criminal law for major crimes and an equivalent version of the FBI and courts to try the accused?
#111324 to #111310 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
No. There should definitely be, as there already is, cooperation between European police forces, but never at EU level.

If EU-citizens feel like their civil rights are being violated, they can have it tried at the EU-court or ECHR.
#111333 to #111324 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
A lot of the stuff which is circulating suggests the cooperation really isn't working well enough though
#111319 to #111310 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +2
(03/24/2016) [-]
no
you're encouraging a larger federalized government. The EU should not fall into the same trap the US fell into
#111334 to #111319 - redandgreen
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Only in criminal law for things like terrorism, arms and people trafficking. Really major crimes. I'm not suggesting anything beyond that.
#111304 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
shekelnator's new post brings up an interesting question, what should be done with Saudi Arabia?

I think its safe to say that Saudi Arabia is literally the ISIS that made it, and its obviously known that they fund and support terrorism. Should the US just lay back and accept that because they get a lot of oil from them and that is vital to America's economy, or should something be done? Is it not incredibly immoral to not call out Saudi Arabia's mischief and support of terrorism?
#111338 to #111304 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
The biggest hurdle in dealing with Saudi Arabia and other oil monarchies is our own oil industry's investment in them. We need to be able to sustain ourselves without oil first, which is why we have companies like Exxon that spread anti-environmentalist propaganda and FUD about renewable energy. If they don't like it, tough shit.

What the US, UK and EU need to accept is that secular political movements that lead to long term stability will also probably lead to nationalization of industry, which is why we sparked the Iranian Revolution and made them theocratic to begin with.

Plus, they're all absolute monarchs. The only use for these people is as target practice.
#111351 to #111338 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Well so far environmental energy is too inefficient to see mainstream use in the US. We'll have to wait for nuclear to dominate completely, specifically nuclear fusion not nuclear fission.

The day nuclear fusion is mainstream is the day we don't need oil.
#111361 to #111351 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Nuclear would be a great alternative in general, but people still think it means scary explosions.
#111362 to #111361 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Yet we have so many nuclear reactors, nuclear fusion is very safe and environmental friendly and creates an incredibly amount of energy. Just put like 50 together in the desert of Arizona and wire it to most of the US (example) if people are scared of living next to one.
#111381 to #111362 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I know, but modern Western politics thrive on a culture of fear: for people to be less apprehensive to nuclear energy and other similar ideas, they have to be less easily controlled.
#111383 to #111381 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I know for immigration you think conservatives create a culture of fear against other groups, but I'm pretty sure its the opposite. Leftists have created a culture of fear (political correctness you could say) against speaking up about topics like these, why should we accept these people? Will this actually benefit us? How is multiculturalism good for a homogeneous European country with Western values?
#111321 to #111304 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Embargos. Nobody buy their oil and we'll see how well they will fare without us.
#111325 to #111321 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
That's not really how real life works, you don't just see who breaks first. America needs the oil more than Saudi needs the money.
#111326 to #111325 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
We should get more oil from say, Russia.
#111328 to #111326 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
That's... a very simple way of looking at the problem. I don't think that's how it works.
#111330 to #111328 - cognosceteipsum ONLINE
Reply -1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Who knows. They really only have one way to sustain themselves. Sometimes people overlook simple solutions because they think it just can't be that easy. This may or may not be one of those situations. I do not know.
#111312 to #111304 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I dont think US would lay down supporting KSA. because KSA is the reason why US has huge influence in here and giving US ability to do whatever they want. it is a mix of Israel and IS.

WE WANT THEIR END. but we tried doing that and US covered up the revolt and 109 people got beheaded. and in Bahrain people until now going to jail and being beaten. and in Kuwait and Qatar they took their nationality away and made them stateless. and UAE god knows. and in Oman you will be sent to UK Secret Agency. and in Jordan they will put you in jail and beat your ass up. and in Lebanon you will be abducted, watch your children being raped to death and then disappear.

Welcome to USA allies policy.
#111314 to #111312 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
i mean look. Cuck US president laying down his head for this thing.
#111315 to #111314 - shekelnator
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
yes Cameron bow to him for your fucking prize you scum of Europe. hope your people beat you to death.
#111279 - shekelnator
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
Saudi Arabia Uncovered ITV Guys. watch this and save it. Youtube might remove it in the name of Freedom of Speech or Harassment. I might be dead or Mossad will arrest me for sharing this.
#111274 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +6
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111296 to #111274 - unforgivensoul
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
I can not begin to describe how much I loved that game. Most enjoyable gaming experience I will ever have is MW2.
#111350 to #111296 - asotil
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
WaW was better

Half because I came from a household where my dad never stopped talking about ww2, and half because it was flat out better than MW2
#111356 to #111350 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
WaW was the first COD I played with friends, I owned the previous ones before but never got to play with anyone. The game was amazing when it came out, it honestly disturbed me at the time. And the zombies was great too, especially split screen with friends after school. So don't get me wrong, the game has a special place in my heart too. Campaign - amazing, Zombies - amazing, Multiplayer - eh. The multiplayer of WaW just doesn't compare to MW2. MW2 was amazing because it was so arcady, so chaotic. WaW didn't have that on nearly the same level, MW2 was just perfect when it came to environment and feel, the two cannot be compared on multiplayer. I can't see how anyone can honestly argue against that, WaW MP has claimed a reputation of not being the best lets just say.

I'll give you my personal opinion on the past ones
WaW: Campaign amazing, Zombies amazing, Multiplayer eh
MW2: Campaign amazing, Spec Ops great, Multiplayer amazing
Black ops: Campaign good, zombies amazing, multiplayer eh (not my thing)
MW3: Campaign amazing, spec ops eh, multiplayer - eh (unoriginal)
Black ops 2 : campaign BAD, zombies eh, multiplayer great (didn't have the MW2 feel though).
Haven't played a single one since because they're garbage, and I never got to play COD4 MP when it came out so I can't fairly judge.

So if I had to rank 1) MW2 2) WaW 3) BO3
#111303 to #111296 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111307 to #111303 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I was in grade 7 when my parents finally bought me xbox live and MW2 came out, and after school my friends and I would spend hours and hours playing it. Every single day, hours and hours of MW2 Search and Destroy, or Quickscoping on Rust, or knife only matches, or trying to go for nukes with One Man Army Noobtube on demolition. Shit was so fun, and I was fucking amazing at that game. I was the best quickscopper out of anyone on my friends list, the best knifer, and I got so many nukes through noobtoobing. There was times when I'd get 3 nukes in a row in 3 matches in Demolition. God that game was fucking amazing, it was COD on steroids. Everything people hated about that game, I loved.

Quickscopping made it fun to snipe.
Commando and Tac Knife made it fun to do knife-only
Noob tube made it much easier to get nukes and piss people off.
Everything was said to be "unbalanced" yet it ended up balancing everything so perfectly. And God were the killstreaks fun, it actually made the game interesting unlike CODs after it. Everything about that game was perfect.

I have like min 50 hours on it since it came out. Probably more since I had many accounts.
#111308 to #111307 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
>noobtuber
#111309 to #111308 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Noobtubing was fucking great.
#111299 to #111296 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
That and C&C: Generals are also some of my favorite games.

People criticized MW2 for this particular scene, but I disagree. Conflict is ugly, and this game sure showed it.
#111300 to #111299 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
oh man you are poking the right nostalgia buttons for me. C&C Generals and the original MoH were the first games I ever played on the computer at the age of 6, when I still lived in Israel. Only two games I had on my computer and I loved them.

MW2 is unarguably the best COD for me.
#111302 to #111300 - thumbfortrump
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Same. Being able to nuke a sandnigger base and decimating a group of tanks with a red-white-and-blue airstrike is some of the most satisfaction I've had.

God, war is great.
#111277 to #111274 - pebar ONLINE
Reply +3
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111282 to #111277 - Shiny
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111298 to #111282 - unforgivensoul
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
How does this even relate with the comic, there was nothing to refute... it just shows how idiotic regressives react.
#111284 to #111282 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
#111259 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Progressives try almost as hard to keep radical Islam out of the conversation almost as hard as conservatives try to keep guns out of it.
#111261 to #111259 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
For most voters, guns aren't a major issue.
Terrorism is
#111263 to #111261 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
You're more likely to be shot by a toddler than killed by a terrorist, in America.
#111286 to #111263 - youregaylol
Reply +1
(03/24/2016) [-]
You're more likely to be killed by a car accident than a gun, in America.

Damn cuntservatives ignoring the real problem.
#111341 to #111286 - anon
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
So the order of danger is

cars > toddlers with guns > terrorists

theism bringing the logic as always
#111275 to #111263 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Lets keep it that way
#111306 to #111275 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Fix both bruh.
#111313 to #111306 - lotengo
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I mean as in. lets keep islamic terrorism in the west as small as possible
#111331 to #111313 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
Yeah. It would also be nice to keep the number of people shit by toddlers as small as possible.
#111264 to #111263 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
I know, but as a issue that may sway people's votes, terrorism is more significant
#111266 to #111264 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
People are also pretty big on guns. It shifts quite a bit as terrorism is in the news at the moment terrorism is in people's minds but when guns are in the news that's in people's minds.
#111270 to #111268 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
The poll puts terrorism at 6% and doesn't even count guns as an issue.
#111271 to #111270 - pebar ONLINE
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
scroll down
guns are at 1%
#111273 to #111271 - theism
Reply 0
(03/24/2016) [-]
My fault, I thought ctrl-f would find the text but it was an image. What I'm saying is that terrorism is in the news, and these polls are from late 2015-2016

www.gallup.com/poll/186248/quarter-voters-say-candidate-share-view-guns.aspx?g_source=gun%20violence%20important&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles
Guns are obviously important to a good chunk of people.

And the important issue is when there's a conversation on these things, people try to distract the conversation away from the thing they don't want to talk about.